The utility of routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal in children and adolescents following ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Radiographic Evaluation of Ileal Pouch Disorders: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Radiographic imaging of the abdomen and pelvis plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of ileal pouch disorders with modalities including CT, MRI, contrasted pouchography, and defecography.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review of the literature and describe applications of cross-sectional imaging, pouchography, defecography, and ultrasonography.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant articles on endoscopy in ileal pouches published between January 2003 and June 2023 in English were included on the basis of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

INTERVENTION

Main abdominal and pelvic imaging modalities and their applications in the diagnosis of ileal pouch disorders were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Accuracy in characterization of ileal pouch disorders.

RESULTS

CT is the test of choice for the evaluation of acute anastomotic leaks, perforation, and abscess(es). MRI of the pelvis is suitable for the assessment of chronic anastomotic leaks and their associated fistulas and sinus tracts, as well as for the penetrating phenotype of Crohn's disease of the pouch. CT enterography and magnetic resonance enterography are useful in assessing intraluminal, intramural, and extraluminal disease processes of the pouch and prepouch ileum. Water-soluble contrast pouchography is particularly useful for evaluating acute or chronic anastomotic leaks and outlines the shape and configuration of the pouch. Defecography is the key modality to evaluate structural and functional pouch inlet and outlet obstructions. Ultrasonography can be performed to assess the pouch in experienced IBD centers.

LIMITATIONS

This is a qualitative, not quantitative, review of mainly case series and case reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominopelvic imaging, along with clinical and endoscopic evaluation, is imperative for accurately assessing structural, inflammatory, functional, and neoplastic disorders. See video from symposium .

Complications following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in pediatric ulcerative colitis

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice for reconstruction after total proctocolectomy in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis. 30-60 % of patients undergoing IPAA will experience a postoperative complication. The primary objective of this article is to address the most common complications specific to IPAA in the pediatric population and provide an up-to-date review of their presentation, risk factors, workup, and management. We also share our preferred approaches to management and prevention of complications, where relevant. We intend to provide a concise review on the topic aimed at pediatric surgeons and healthcare providers involved in the care of this population with the goal of contributing to improved outcomes and patient quality of life.

Management of Anastomotic Leaks in Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis

Anastomotic leaks remain a dreaded complication after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). Their impacts can be devastating, ranging from an acute leak leading to postoperative sepsis to chronic leaks and sinus tracts resulting in long-term pouch dysfunction and subsequent pouch failure. The management of acute leaks is intricate. Initial management is important to resolve acute sepsis, but the type of acute intervention impacts long-term pouch function. Aggressive management in the postoperative period, including the use of IV fluids, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and operative interventions may be necessary to preserve pouch structure and function. Early identification and knowledge of the most common areas of leak, such as at the IPAA anastomosis, are important for guiding management. Long-term complications, such as pouch sinuses, pouch-vaginal fistulas, and diminished IPAA function complicate the overall survival and functionality of the pouch. Knowledge and awareness of the identification and management of leaks is crucial for optimizing IPAA success.

Postoperative complications of colectomy and J-pouch with ileostomy versus without ileostomy in children with inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy of performing a restorative proctocolectomy and J-pouch ileoanal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy in children with inflammatory bowel disease has been a longstanding debate. A systematic review and meta-analysis is presented comparing the occurrence of postoperative complications in children who underwent either the pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with ileostomy (diverted) versus the undiverted procedure.

Methods

Records were sourced from CINAHL, CENTRAL, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. Studies followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and compared postoperative complications in pediatric patients diagnosed with inflammatory diseases aged less than 18 years who underwent J-pouch with ileostomy versus without ileostomy. The primary outcome was the occurrence of postoperative leaks, and the secondary outcomes were presence of postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO), pouchitis, stricture and fistula complications. A random-effects meta-analysis was used.

Results

Twenty-three observational studies in the systematic review were included with 658 patients (83% diverted, 17% undiverted). Pooled estimates showed no difference in occurrence of leaks in children who underwent J-pouch/IPAA with ileostomy versus without (odds ratio (OR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 1.64, I2=16%). There was no difference in the occurrence of SBO, pouchitis or strictures in children who underwent J-pouch/IPAA with ileostomy versus without (SBO: OR 2.27, 95% CI 0.52 to 9.92, I2=0%, pouchitis: OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.24, I2=0%, strictures: OR 2.72, 95% CI 0.44 to 16.69, I2=66%).

Conclusion

The meta-analysis did not find differences in the occurrence of complications in pediatric patients who underwent the IPAA with ileostomy procedure versus without ileostomy.

Pouchogram Prior to Ileostomy Reversal after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: Is it Useful in the Setting of Routine EUA?

PURPOSE

To determine if there is a role for routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal after IPAA in pediatric patients.

METHODS

The medical records of pediatric patients who underwent pouchogram between 2007 and 2017 prior to ileostomy reversal after IPAA at two affiliated hospitals were reviewed for concordance between exam under anesthesia (EUA) and pouchogram findings, management of abnormal pouchogram findings, and short and long-term outcomes after ileostomy reversal. Clinical notes were used to find patient-reported symptoms at the time of pouchogram.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (57% female) underwent pouchogram before planned ileostomy reversal. The median time from IPAA formation to pouchogram was 60.5 days (IQR: 46-77) and median follow-up was 4 years (IQR: 1-6). Fifty-seven patients (95%) were asymptomatic prior to reversal. Of the 40 asymptomatic patients with a normal EUA, pouchogram detected one stricture (3%), but reversal proceeded as planned. In the 16 patients with strictures on EUA, pouchogram only detected six (40%). One of 50 (2%) asymptomatic patients with normal pouchogram had anastomotic dehiscence found on EUA. Despite normal pouchogram and EUA, four asymptomatic patients required subsequent diversion for pouch-related complications between 13 and 60 months after ileostomy reversal. Three patients had pelvic pain prior to pouchogram; associated symptoms included perineal pain (n = 1) hematochezia (n = 1), and tenesmus (n = 1). EUA and pouchogram were concordant in two patients (n = 1 anastomotic complication, n = 1 pouch septum) and ileostomy reversal was delayed. In the remaining symptomatic patient, pouchogram detected an anastomotic leak where EUA detected only a stricture, and this prompted a delay in reversal. Long term, none of these patients required diversion or excision of their pouch.

CONCLUSION

Routine pouchogram in asymptomatic pediatric patients does not change management and can be omitted, thereby sparing patients discomfort and unnecessary radiation exposure. Pouchogram may have diagnostic value in symptomatic patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

TYPE OF STUDY

Study of Diagnostic Test.

Are radiologic pouchogram and pouchoscopy useful before ileostomy closure in asymptomatic patients operated for ulcerative colitis?

OBJECTIVES

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the "gold standard" procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring surgical intervention. A de-functioning ileostomy is usually performed, as a step for the IPAA procedure. The aim of this study is to present the methodology and results of the routine double assessment of IPAA integrity in asymptomatic patients prior to the ileostomy reversal and evaluate its necessity.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 61 UC patients, who underwent IPAA construction, in 2010-2016. A diverting ileostomy was created after IPAA construction, which was reversed at least 3 months later. A double assessment, with pouchogram and pouchoscopy, of IPAA integrity was performed, before stoma closure. Post-operative symptoms and signs of complications, imaging studies, and endoscopic findings were recorded during follow-up.

RESULTS

Prior to the ileostomy reversal, both pouchoscopy and pouchogram identified no patient with evidence of anastomotic leakage. During a mean follow-up of 3.67 years after ileostomy reversal, 11 patients developed complications but only one had signs of leakage, which presented as a pouch-vaginal fistula. The specificity of both the pouchogram and pouchoscopy reached 100% and the negative predictive value ranged between 98.4 and 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The specificity of pouchoscopy and pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure, in asymptomatic patients with IPAA for UC, is very high in recognizing an intact anastomosis, but their combination did not alter the diagnostic accuracy or had any effect in further management. At least, pouchogram could be selectively performed only in patients with high-risk clinical indicators.

KEY POINTS

• The double assessment of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with pouchogram and pouchoscopy, prior to ileostomy closure, specifically in patients with ulcerative colitis has not been evaluated before. • The specificity of pouchoscopy and pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure, in asymptomatic patients with IPAA for UC, is very high in recognizing an intact anastomosis. • However, their combination did not alter the diagnostic accuracy or had any effect in further management, in asymptomatic patients.

Clinical value of pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

In patients who undergo restorative proctocoletomy (RPC) a pouchogram is often used to assess the integrity of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) before closing the covering ileostomy. There are no good data to support this practice. The aim of the study was to investigate whether contrast pouchography was clinically useful after RPC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who had undergone RPC with a covering ileostomy between September 2013 and September 2015.

RESULTS

61 patients were included. 7 (11%) presented with anastomotic leak and 2 (3%) with pelvic collection, detected on cross-sectional imaging for early postoperative symptoms. In the remaining 52 patients, without immediate postoperative complications, pouchography was performed at a median of 14 weeks (range 7-71 weeks) after RPC. Each patient also underwent examination under anaesthesia (EUA) to assess the integrity of the IPAA on the day of the ileostomy closure. One asymptomatic patient (2%) had an anastomotic leak demonstrated on pouchogram which was subsequently confirmed at EUA. Two patients (3%) with a normal pouchogram, 1 symptomatic and 1 asymptomatic, subsequently had an anastomotic leak demonstrated at EUA.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouchogram has a low sensitivity in identifying anastomotic leak before ileostomy reversal in patients after RPC and only rarely changes management. In our series it identified the diagnosis of anastomotic leak in only 1 patient and gave false reassurance in two others. Complications are more frequently detected by clinical history and formal EUA before ileostomy closure.

Complications in children with ulcerative colitis undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is considered the standard procedure for the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. Despite the widespread utility of the procedure, as many as 75% of patients who undergo IPAA, experience at least 1 complication. This review highlights difficult intraoperative scenarios and complications of pouch surgery in children, including intraoperative, postoperative, and functional complications. Intraoperative scenarios include insufficient mesenteric length and positive leak tests. Postoperative complications include surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, stricture, fistula, pouchitis, small bowel obstruction, and pouch failure. Less common complications include afferent limb syndrome, pouch prolapse, and superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Functional complications include incontinence, impaired quality of life, infertility, and sexual dysfunction. Despite complications, most patients are satisfied with their outcomes and report an improvement in their lifestyle.

Routine contrast enema is not required for all infants prior to ostomy reversal: A 10-year single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of intestinal stricture is low for most conditions requiring a primary small bowel stoma in infants. Routine performance of contrast enemas (CE) prior to stoma closure adds cost and radiation exposure. We hypothesized that routine CE prior to ostomy reversal is not necessary in all infants, and sought to identify a subset of patients who may benefit from preoperative CE.

METHODS

Medical records of infants under age 1 (N=161) undergoing small bowel stoma reversal at a single institution between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Student's T-test was used to compare groups.

RESULTS

Contrast enemas were performed on 80% of all infants undergoing small bowel ostomy reversal during the study period. Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were more likely to have a CE than those with intestinal atresia (p=0.03) or those with all other diagnoses combined (p=0.03). Nine strictures were identified on CE. Of those, 8 (89%) were in patients with NEC, and only 4 were clinically significant and required operative resection. The overall relevant stricture rate was 2.5%. No patient that underwent ostomy takedown without CE had a stricture diagnosed intraoperatively or an unrecognized stricture that presented clinically after stoma takedown.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine CE is not required prior to small bowel ostomy reversal in infants. We recommend judicious use of enema studies in patients with NEC and high likelihood of stricture.

A think tank of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) on the surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease using the Delphi method: ulcerative colitis

The majority of patients suffering from ulcerative colitis (UC) are managed successfully with medical treatment, but a relevant number of them will still need surgery at some point in their life. Medical treatments and surgical techniques have changed dramatically in recent years, and available guidelines from relevant societies are rapidly evolving, providing UC experts with updated and valid practical recommendations. However, some aspects of the management of UC patients are still debated, and the application of guidelines in clinical practice may be suboptimal. The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) sponsored the think tank in order to identify critical aspects of the surgical management of UC in Italy. The present paper reports the results of a think tank of Italian colorectal surgeons concerning surgery for UC and was not developed as an alternative to authoritative guidelines currently available. Members of the SICCR voted on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence from the literature. The results are presented, focusing on points to be implemented. UC management relies on evaluations that need to be individualized, but points of major disagreement reported in this paper should be considered in order to develop strategies to improve the quality of the evidence and the application of guidelines in a clinical setting.