Comparative study of the efficacy and safety between blonanserin and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia in Chinese patients: A double-blind, parallel-group multicenter randomized trial

Who can benefit more from its twelve-week treatment: A prospective cohort study of blonanserin for patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Blonanserin (BNS) is a well-tolerated and effective drug for treating schizophrenia.

AIM

To investigate which types of patients would obtain the most benefit from BNS treatment.

METHODS

A total of 3306 participants were evaluated in a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, open-label post-marketing surveillance study of BNS. Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) scores were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of BNS, and its safety was assessed with the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Linear regression was used to screen the influencing factors for the reduction of BPRS total score, and logistic regression was used to identify patients with a better response to BNS.

RESULTS

The baseline BPRS total score (48.8 ± 15.03) decreased to 27.7 ± 10.08 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001). Extrapyramidal symptoms (14.6%) were found to be the most frequent adverse drug reactions. The acute phase, baseline BPRS total score, current episode duration, number of previous episodes, dose of concomitant antipsychotics, and number of types of sedative-hypnotic agents were found to be independent factors affecting the reduction of BPRS total score after treatment initiation. Specifically, patients in the acute phase with baseline BPRS total score ≥ 45, current episode duration < 3 months, and ≤ 3 previous episodes derived greater benefit from 12-week treatment with BNS.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the acute phase with more severe symptoms, shorter current episode duration, fewer previous episodes, and a lower psychotropic drug load derived the greatest benefit from treatment with BNS.

Efficacy and tolerability of blonanserin in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Blonanserin is approved for treating schizophrenia in Japan, South Korea, India, and China. We aimed to synthesize the efficacy and tolerability of blonanserin compared to other antipsychotics.

METHODS

A systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis were conducted using the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's study-based trial register until January 24, 2024. We included open and blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving schizophrenia patients, with studies lasting at least 3 weeks. Primary outcomes focused on overall schizophrenia symptoms using rating scales and relapse rates. Secondary outcomes included symptom subtypes, treatment response, dropout rates, quality of life, and side effects, analyzed using standardized mean difference (SMD), mean difference (MD), and risk ratio (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). The review protocol was published in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/e7jfa/).

RESULTS

Fourteen acute-phase studies with 2697 participants compared blonanserin to olanzapine, haloperidol, risperidone, paliperidone, aripiprazole, amisulpride, and placebo. Blonanserin showed greater efficacy than placebo (SMD = -0.47, 95 % CI: -0.66 to -0.27) and similar efficacy to other antipsychotics in reducing schizophrenia overall symptoms. No data on the number of participants who experienced relapse with blonanserin was available in the single maintenance-phase study. There were also no clear differences between antipsychotics in most secondary efficacy outcomes, but blonanserin produced less prolactin and weight increase but more akathisia and tremor than risperidone, and less prolactin increase, anticholinergic and extrapyramidal side-effects than haloperidol.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that differences in efficacy between blonanserin and other antipsychotics are small and that blonanserin has a different tolerability profile than haloperidol and risperidone.

Improvement of social functioning in patients with first-episode schizophrenia using blonanserin treatment: a prospective, multi-centre, single-arm clinical trial

Objectives

This clinical trial primarily aimed to investigate the effects of blonanserin on social functioning in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.

Methods

In this prospective, multi-centre, single-arm clinical trial study, blonanserin (flexible oral dose ranging from 8mg to 24mg per day) was given 26 weeks. Outcome measures included the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale for evaluating social functioning, the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) for measuring neurocognitive performance, and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for assessing symptom severity. The primary endpoint was social function improvement evaluated by PSP scale at the end of blonanserin treatment. And the secondary endpoint was to validate the efficacy and neurocognitive effects of blonanserin. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were also recorded and analysed.

Results

A total of 96 patients with first-episode schizophrenia were recruited and proceeded to analysis. Fifty-one participants (53.1%) completed the PSP scale measurements at baseline and week 26. Following 26 weeks of blonanserin treatment, all outcome measurements demonstrated significant improvement during the follow-up period. Notably, PSP scores exhibited a continuous increase up to 68.1% ± 103.7% at the end of the treatment (46.6 ± 14.6 at baseline, 69.4 ± 17.4 at week 26, p<0.001), indicating positive effects on social functioning that were already noticeable by week 8.

Conclusion

Blonanserin treatment exhibited favourable effects on social functioning in individuals with first-episode schizophrenia. The results suggest that blonanserin was effective treatment options for patients with schizophrenia encountering functional impairments.

Gene Polymorphisms and Drug-Drug Interactions Determine the Metabolic Profile of Blonanserin

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) gene polymorphism and drug interaction on the metabolism of blonanserin. Human recombinant CYP3A4 was prepared using the Bac-to-Bac baculovirus expression system. A microsomal enzyme reaction system was established, and drug-drug interactions were evaluated using Sprague-Dawley rats. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to detect the concentrations of blonanserin and its metabolite. Compared with wild type CYP34A, the relative clearance of blonanserin by CYP3A4.29 significantly increased to 251.3%, while it decreased notably with CYP3A4.4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 23, 24, 28, 31, 33, and 34, ranging from 6.09% to 63.34%. Among 153 tested drugs, nimodipine, felodipine, and amlodipine were found to potently inhibit the metabolism of blonanserin. Moreover, the inhibitory potency of nimodipine, felodipine, and amlodipine varied with different CYP3A4 variants. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration and enzymatic kinetics assay demonstrated that the metabolism of blonanserin was noncompetitively inhibited by nimodipine in rat liver microsomes and was inhibited in a mixed manner by felodipine and amlodipine in both rat liver microsomes and human liver microsomes. When nimodipine and felodipine were coadministered with blonanserin, the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC)(0-t), AUC(0-∞), and C max of blonanserin increased. When amlodipine and blonanserin were combined, the C max of blonanserin C increased remarkably. The vast majority of CYP3A4 variants have a low ability to catalyze blonanserin. With combined administration of nimodipine, felodipine, and amlodipine, the elimination of blonanserin was inhibited. This study provides the basis for individualized clinical use of blonanserin. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The enzyme kinetics of novel CYP3A4 enzymes for metabolizing blonanserin were investigated. Clearance of blonanserin by CYP3A4.4, 5, 7-10, 12-14, 16-18, 23-24, 28, 31, 33, and 34 decreased notably, but increased with CYP3A4.29. Additionally, we established a drug interaction spectrum for blonanserin, in which nimodipine, felodipine, and amlodipine kinetics exhibited mixed inhibition. Moreover, their inhibitory potencies decreased with CYP3A4.4 and 5 compared to CYP3A4.1. This study provides essential data for personalized clinical use of blonanserin.

Efficacy and safety of blonanserin versus risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of blonanserin and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia and to provide reliable pharmacotherapeutic evidence for in the clinical treatment of schizophrenia.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases for head-to-head randomized controlled trials that compared blonanserin with risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia. We extracted the following data: author, year, country, diagnostic criteria, sample size, course of treatment, dosage and outcomes. Our main endpoint was the changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores. Meta-analysis of the included data was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. We used the GRADE criteria to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 411 studies were initially; 8 trials were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 1386 participants). Regarding efficacy, there was no difference in changes in the PANSS total scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). In terms of safety, compared to risperidone, the incidence of serum prolactin increases and weight gain in the blonanserin group was lower (P<0.05), but the incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) was higher (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of blonanserin is similar to that of risperidone, but it is unclear whether blonanserin is more effective than risperidone at improving cognitive and social function. More high-quality studies are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in the future.

Safety and effectiveness of oral medium to high dose blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia: subgroup analysis from a prospective, multicenter, post-marketing surveillance study in mainland China

BACKGROUND

Blonanserin (BNS) had been undergoing post-market surveillance (PMS) since September 2018. Using the surveillance data, we did this analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of different doses of BNS to explore a sufficient dose range of BNS in Chinese patients with schizophrenia (SZ).

METHODS

A 12-week, prospective, observational, single-arm, multicenter, open-label PMS was conducted. In this analysis, we divided the patients from PMS into low, medium to high, and high dose groups based on the dose of BNS they received, with medium to high dose group being the focus. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores at week 2 or 4, 6 or 8, and 12 were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of BNS in improving psychiatric symptoms. The safety of BNS was reported as the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

364 patients were included in the medium to high dose group, of which 321 completed the surveillance, with a dropout rate of 11.8%. The mean daily dose was 15.1 ± 1.92 mg. The BPRS total score was 50.1 ± 11.95 at baseline and decreased to 26.6 ± 7.43 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001). When compared with other groups, the median to high dose group achieved significantly more reduction in BPRS score at week 12 (P = 0.004 versus low dose and P = 0.033 versus higher dose). Extrapyramidal symptoms [EPS (46.4%)] were the most common adverse reactions in the medium to high group. The average weight gain during the surveillance was 0.5 ± 2.56 kg and prolactin elevation occurred in 2.2% patients. Most adverse reactions were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

BNS at medium to high doses (mean 15.1 mg/d) significantly improved symptoms of SZ and was well-tolerated. Most ADRs were mild, and the likelihood of causing metabolic side effects and prolactin elevations was low. Medium to high dose of BNS is a more potent treatment choice for SZ.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100048734. Date of registration: 2021/07/15 (retrospectively registered).

Adverse effects of antipsychotics on sleep in patients with schizophrenia. Systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse effects on sleep in patients with schizophrenia receiving antipsychotic treatment.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, Toxline, Ebsco, Virtual Health Library, Web of Science, SpringerLink, and in Database of abstracts of Reviews of Effects of Randomized Clinical Trials to identify eligible studies published from January 1990 to October 2021. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the CONSORT list, and the Cochrane bias tool. Network meta-analysis was performed using the Bayesian random-effects model, with multivariate meta-regression to assess the association of interest.

Results

87 randomized clinical trials were identified that met the inclusion criteria, and 70 articles were included in the network meta-analysis. Regarding the methodological quality of the studies, 47 had a low or moderate bias risk. The most common adverse effects on sleep reported in the studies were insomnia, somnolence, and sedation. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that ziprasidone was associated with an increased risk of insomnia (OR, 1.56; 95% credible interval CrI, 1.18-2.06). Several of the included antipsychotics were associated with a significantly increased risk of somnolence; haloperidol (OR, 1.90; 95% CrI, 1.12-3.22), lurasidone (OR, 2.25; 95% CrI, 1.28-3.97) and ziprasidone (OR, 1.79; 95% CrI, 1.06-3.02) had the narrowest confidence intervals. In addition, perphenazine (OR, 5.33; 95% CrI, 1.92-14.83), haloperidol (OR, 2.61; 95% CrI, 1.14-5.99), and risperidone (OR, 2.41; 95% CrI, 1.21-4.80) were associated with an increased risk of sedation compared with placebo, and other antipsychotics did not differ. According to the SUCRAs for insomnia, chlorpromazine was ranked as the lowest risk of insomnia (57%), followed by clozapine (20%), while flupentixol (26 %) and perospirone (22.5%) were associated with a lower risk of somnolence. On the other hand, amisulpride (89.9%) was the safest option to reduce the risk of sedation.

Discussion

Insomnia, sedation, and somnolence were the most frequent adverse effects on sleep among the different antipsychotics administered. The evidence shows that chlorpromazine, clozapine, flupentixol, perospirone, and amisulpride had favorable safety profiles. In contrast, ziprasidone, perphenazine, haloperidol, and risperidone were the least safe for sleep.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017078052, identifier: PROSPERO 2017 CRD42017078052.

Effectiveness and safety of blonanserin in young and middle-aged female patients with schizophrenia: data from a post-marketing surveillance

BACKGROUND

A post-marketing surveillance of blonanserin has been ongoing since September 2018. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral blonanserin in Chinese young and middle-aged female patients with schizophrenia in real clinical settings, using the data from the post-marketing surveillance.

METHODS

A 12-week, prospective, multi-center, open-label, post-marketing surveillance was conducted. Female patients aged 18-40 years were included in this analysis. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of blonanserin in improving psychiatric symptoms. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), prolactin elevation and the weight gain were used to evaluate the safety profile of blonanserin.

RESULTS

A total of 392 patients were included both in the safety and full analysis sets, 311 patients completed the surveillance protocol. The BPRS total score was 48.8 ± 14.11 at the baseline, decreasing to 25.5 ± 7.56 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001, compared with baseline). EPS (20.2%) including akathisia, tremor, dystonia, and parkinsonism were found as the most frequent ADRs. The mean weight gain was 0.27 ± 2.5 kg at 12 weeks from the baseline. Four cases (1%) of prolactin elevation were observed during the period of surveillance.

CONCLUSION

Blonanserin significantly improved the symptoms of schizophrenia in female patients aged 18-40 years; the drug was well tolerated and had a low tendency to cause metabolic side effects, including prolactin elevation in these patients. Blonanserin might be a reasonable drug for the treatment of schizophrenia in young and middle-aged female patients.

Switching from blonanserin oral tablets/powders to transdermal patches alleviates extrapyramidal symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: A 52-week open-label study

Blonanserin is a second-generation antipsychotic for the treatment of schizophrenia. Blonanserin has two different routes of administration: oral tablets/powder and transdermal patches. The aim of this study was to investigate as a post-hoc analysis of an original study whether switching from blonanserin tablets/powders to transdermal patches would reduce extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and/or the dose of antiparkinsonian drugs for the stabilization of blood pharmacokinetics in patients with schizophrenia. Patients with schizophrenia (n = 155) were enrolled in either cohort 1 or 2. In cohort 1 (n = 97), patients received 40-80 mg/day blonanserin transdermal patches for one year after taking 8-16 mg/day blonanserin tablets for 6 weeks, and the dose of patches was determined based on the dose of the tablets. In cohort 2 (n = 58), all patients started with 40 mg/day blonanserin patches and then received 40-80 mg/day for a year after taking blonanserin tablets/powders. Changes from the start of transdermal patch treatment in EPS and the dose of antiparkinsonian drugs at 3, 6, and 12 months were assessed using the Drug-Induced EPS Scale (DIEPSS) and biperiden equivalents of total antiparkinsonian drugs (BPD-eq), respectively. Among 155 patients, only four patients in cohort 1 discontinued owing to EPS during a patch period. Significant improvements from the start of patch treatment in the DIEPSS total score at any point were observed (mean change±SD): -0.44 ± 1.50 (p = 0.013), -0.07 ± 1.78 (p = 0.73), and - 0.14 ± 1.37 (p = 0.44) in cohort 1 and - 0.16 ± 1.32 (p = 0.40), -0.74 ± 1.92 (p = 0.020), and - 0.81 ± 2.22 (p = 0.047) in cohort 2 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. In contrast, there were no significant changes from the start of patch treatment in BPD-eq at any month (p > 0.05). Transdermal patches of blonanserin are a more effective route of administration to diminish EPS than oral tablets/powder.

Prediction of Corresponding Dose of Transdermal Blonanserin to Oral Dose Based on Dopamine D2 Receptor Occupancy: Unique Characteristics of Blonanserin Transdermal Patch

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Blonanserin is an atypical antipsychotic, a potent selective antagonist of dopamine D2 receptor (D2), prescribed as oral formulations in patients with schizophrenia. Blonanserin transdermal patch was developed to provide a new treatment option, but the corresponding dose to oral blonanserin was not clear. The aims of this study were to clarify the pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic characteristics of blonanserin after transdermal patch application and to evaluate the corresponding dose to oral formulation based on striatal D2 occupancy.

METHODS

The relationship between D2 occupancy and plasma blonanserin concentration was analyzed using an Emax model based on data from positron emission tomography study with oral and transdermal blonanserin. D2 occupancy was simulated using Emax models based on the observed plasma concentrations and the simulated plasma concentrations obtained from population PK model.

RESULTS

Plasma blonanserin concentration levels after repeated patch applications were nearly stable throughout the day and no effect of sex, advanced age, or application site was detected. The concentration at half maximal D2 occupancy during transdermal patch applications, 0.857 ng/mL, was higher than that after oral doses, 0.112 ng/mL, suggesting metabolite contribution after oral doses. The median predicted D2 occupancy during blonanserin patch applications at doses of 40 and 80 mg/d was 48.7% and 62.5%, respectively, and the distribution of D2 occupancy at these doses could cover most of that at oral doses of 8 to 24 mg/d.

CONCLUSIONS

Predicted D2 occupancy suggested that a 40- to 80-mg/d blonanserin transdermal patch dose corresponds to an 8- to 24-mg/d oral dose for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Safety and Effectiveness of Blonanserin in Chinese Patients with Schizophrenia: An Interim Analysis of a 12-Week Open-Label Prospective Multi-Center Post-marketing Surveillance

Schizophrenia is an unexplained, complex and serious mental illness. Blonanserin (BNS) is a new antipsychotic drug widely used in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, large-scale clinical studies have not been conducted in China. A multi-center, prospective, open-label, 12-week surveillance was carried out to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BNS in patients with schizophrenia in China. Safety assessments included adverse drug reactions (ADRs), extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), akathisia, concomitant medications for EPS by the end of treatment, and the changes in body weight from baseline by the end of treatment. The effectiveness was evaluated by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). From September 2018 to May 2020, of the 1,060 patients enrolled, 1,018 were included in the full analysis set (FAS) and safety set (SS), respectively. ADRs were developed in 205 patients among the included, the incidence being 20.1%. ADRs of EPS occurred in 169 patients, the incidence being 16.6%, ADRs of akathisia occurred in 90 patients, the incidence being 8.8%; concomitant therapeutic and prophylactic agents for EPS accounts for 19.2%; 4.0% of patients had a ≥7% increase in body weight from baseline at 12 weeks after initiating treatment. Using the last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) method, the changes in total BPRS scores were -11.2 ± 10.17 (N = 1,018), -16.8 ± 12.69 (N = 1,018) and -20.6 ± 13.99 (N = 1,018) after 2/4, 6/8, or 12 weeks, respectively. 53.5% (545/1,018) patients showed response to blonanserin treatment in week 12. The post-marketing surveillance results of BNS demonstrates safety profile and effectiveness of the drug.

Comparative Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Olanzapine and Blonanserin in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Parallel Group Study

Background

The antipsychotic olanzapine is a first-line drug in the treatment of schizophrenia while blonanserin is indicated in resistant cases of schizophrenia when the first line antipsychotics have failed. There are very limited studies available world-wide as well as in India that compare blonanserin with other antipsychotics in the setting of schizophrenia.

Aims

To study the efficacy, safety and tolerability of olanzapine and blonanserin in Schizophrenia. Settings and Design: The study was a prospective, observational, parallel group study done on schizophrenia patients aged between 18-50 years of both sexes at an outpatient Department of Psychiatry, in a tertiary medical college. The study was conducted from February 2015 to October 2016, with follow ups at weeks 4, 8 and 12.

Materials and Methods

The efficacy parameters were measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating. The safety parameters included the vital signs, haematological profile, lipid profile, blood sugar monitoring. Adverse drug reactions and compliance to therapy was observed through-out the study period. Appropriate statistical tests were applied to detect any significant within and between group differences using Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS version 17.

Results

There was significant decrease in the mean total score on the BPRS and CGI-S in the blonanserin arm at the 2nd and last follow up visit (p value < 0.001). Compliance was good in both groups (≤ 20% missed pills). Overall, 77 treatment-emergent adverse events were present from 56 patients. Twenty three subjects of the blonanserin arm and 33 subjects in the olanzapine arm at least experienced one adverse event (p = 0.006), metabolic adverse effects were more common with olanzapine, whereas insomnia, headache and somnolence were more often seen with blonanserin.

Conclusions

In the present study, blonanserin provided significantly better outcomes than olanzapine with respect to BPRS, CGI-S scores.

Striatal Dopamine D2 Receptor Occupancy Induced by Daily Application of Blonanserin Transdermal Patches: Phase II Study in Japanese Patients With Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Transdermal antipsychotic patch formulations offer potential benefits, including improved adherence. This study investigated the striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy with daily blonanserin transdermal patch application.

METHODS

This open-label, phase II study enrolled 18 Japanese outpatients (20 to <65 years) with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR criteria; total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score <120 at screening) treated with blonanserin 8-mg or 16-mg tablets. Patients continued tablets for 2-4 weeks at their current dose and were then assigned to once-daily blonanserin patches (10/20/40/60/80 mg daily) for 2-4 weeks based on the oral dose. [11C]raclopride positron emission tomography scanning determined blonanserin striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included assessment of receptor occupancy by dose, changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness-Severity scores, patient attitudes towards adherence, and patch adhesiveness.

RESULTS

Of 18 patients who started the blonanserin tablet treatment period, 14 patients completed treatment. Mean D2 receptor occupancy for blonanserin tablets 8 mg/d (59.2%, n = 5) and 16 mg/d (66.3%, n = 9) was within the values for blonanserin patches: 10 mg/d (33.3%, n = 3), 20 mg/d (29.9%, n = 2), 40 mg/d (61.2%, n = 3), 60 mg/d (59.0%, n = 3), and 80 mg/d (69.9%, n = 3). Occupancy generally increased with increasing blonanserin dose for both formulations with the half maximal receptor occupancy for tablets and patches associated with doses of 6.9 mg/d and 31.9 mg/d, respectively. Diurnal variability in occupancy was lower during transdermal patch treatment than during tablet treatment. Blonanserin transdermal patches were well tolerated with no major safety concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Blonanserin patches (40/80 mg/d) have lower diurnal variability in occupancy than blonanserin tablets (8/16 mg/d), and patches at doses of 40 mg/d and 80 mg/d appear to be a suitable alternative for blonanserin tablets at doses of 8 mg/d and 16 mg/d, respectively. Blonanserin patches represent a potential new treatment option for patients with schizophrenia.

TRIAL REGISTRY

JAPIC Clinical Trials Information registry (www.clinicaltrials.jp; JapicCTI-No: JapicCTI-121914).

Randomized, double-blind, 6-week non-inferiority study of lurasidone and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia

AIM

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone for the treatment of Chinese schizophrenic patients.

METHODS

Hospitalized schizophrenia patients aged 18-65 were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind, double-dummy, flexible-dose treatment with lurasidone (40 or 80 mg/day) or risperidone (2, 4 or 6 mg/day). Efficacy was evaluated using a non-inferiority comparison of lurasidone relative to risperidone based on week 6 change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Safety assessments included adverse events, clinical laboratory measures, and electrocardiograms.

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-four patients were screened to obtain an intent-to-treat sample of 384 patients, of whom 54 patients discontinued treatment prior to 6 weeks. Lurasidone met the criteria for non-inferiority versus risperidone on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean (SE) change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -31.2 (1.0) and -34.9 (1.0) in the lurasidone and risperidone group, respectively. The mean difference score was 3.7, and the upper boundary of the 95%-confidence interval (1.0-6.3) was less than the prespecified margin of 7.0. No clinically meaningful between-treatment group differences were evident on secondary efficacy measures, including PANSS positive, PANSS negative, Clinical Global Impression scale - Severity, and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia scales. The incidence of adverse events was lower for lurasidone vs risperidone for extrapyramidal symptoms (17.0% vs 38.2%), akathisia (7.2% vs 13.6%), prolactin increase (3.1% vs 14.1%), and weight increase (0.5% vs 5.2%).

CONCLUSION

Lurasidone was found to be non-inferior to risperidone on the primary endpoint with minimal effects on weight, metabolic parameters, or prolactin levels.

Efficacy and safety of blonanserin transdermal patch in patients with schizophrenia: A 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Blonanserin is a second-generation antipsychotic used for the treatment of schizophrenia. This study determined the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a blonanserin transdermal patch in patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia.

METHODS

This double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study consisted of a 1-week observation period during which patients were treated with two patches of placebo, followed by a 6-week double-blind period where patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive once-daily blonanserin 40 mg, blonanserin 80 mg, or placebo patches. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the total Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) score. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

Between December 2014 and October 2018, patients were recruited and randomly assigned to blonanserin 40 mg (n = 196), blonanserin 80 mg (n = 194), or placebo (n = 190); of these, 77.2% completed the study. Compared with placebo, blonanserin significantly improved PANSS total scores at 6 weeks (least square mean [LSM] difference vs placebo: -5.6 with blonanserin 40 mg; 95% confidence interval [CI] -9.6, -1.6; adjusted p = 0.007, and - 10.4 with blonanserin 80 mg; 95% CI -14.4, -6.4; adjusted p < 0.001). Blonanserin was well tolerated; the most common TEAEs reported were application-site erythema and pruritus, akathisia, tremor, and insomnia.

CONCLUSIONS

Blonanserin transdermal patch improved the symptoms of acute schizophrenia with acceptable tolerability.

Model-based analysis of therapeutic efficacy of blonanserin and risperidone in schizophrenia patients and effects on prolactin: A randomized double-blind study

This study examined randomized controlled trial data for blonanserin and risperidone in Chinese schizophrenia patients (N = 264). Data related to historical changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were used to successfully construct a longitudinal E_max model. Results: (a) The efficacy of the two drugs was similar after week 8, showing a small difference in PANSS reduction. (b) Using the model, we predicted that each 5-point increase in the baseline FPOS (positive score in PANSS five-factor subscales) leads to a decrease in the PANSS total scores at week 8 for 2 points in patients administered blonanserin. (c) The effect of blonanserin on prolactin (PRL) elevation was less. The model was used to predict that prolactin elevations in patients administered risperidone were 2.41-fold of those in patients administered blonanserin. (d) Model quantitation showed that gender is a risk factor for prolactin elevation. Prolactin elevations in female patients were 2.95-fold of the value in male patients administered the same drug. The model demonstrated Blonanserin has similar antischizophrenic efficacy and less serum prolactin rising compared to risperidone in Chinese patients.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Blonanserin Transdermal Patches in Japanese Patients with Schizophrenia: A 52-Week Open-Label, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Blonanserin transdermal patch therapy is now available in Japan for the treatment of schizophrenia and may provide several advantages over the tablet formulation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of blonanserin transdermal patches in Japanese patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

An open-label study was conducted in adults with schizophrenia at 37 sites in Japan. Patients were enrolled in either cohort 1 or 2. Patients in cohort 1 received 8-16 mg/day blonanserin tablets for 6 weeks and then 40-80 mg/day blonanserin patches for 52 weeks. The dose of blonanserin patches was determined according to the dose of the tablets. In cohort 2, every patient started from 40 mg/day and then 40-80 mg/day blonanserin transdermal patches for 52 weeks. Both cohorts had 1-2 weeks of follow-up. Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs, extrapyramidal AEs [also assessed using the change in Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) score], the use of any concomitant antiparkinsonian drugs, and skin-related AEs, including skin irritation. Patients also underwent assessment of laboratory values including for serum prolactin concentration, vital signs, body weight, electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, and the corrected QT (QTc) interval. Suicidal ideation was assessed via the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) score. Efficacy was assessed via duration of blonanserin transdermal patch treatment, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale scores, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores. Other endpoints included total Drug Attitude Inventory 10 (DAI-10) scores, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) effect values, and a patient questionnaire about the dosage form.

RESULTS

A total of 223 patients with consents, 117 in cohort 1 and 106 in cohort 2 were included in the study. Of the 117 patients in cohort 1, 108 were treated with blonanserin tablets, and 97 received blonanserin patches and were included in the safety analysis set. In cohort 2, 103 of the 106 patients were treated with blonanserin transdermal patches and were included in the safety analysis set. In total, 91 patients were male (45.5%). The mean age was 43.8 years. Discontinuation occurred in 40 patients (41.2%) in cohort 1 and 44 patients (42.7%) in cohort 2. Discontinuation resulted from AEs in 18.6% (cohort 1) and 11.7% (cohort 2) and from withdrawal of consent in 13.4% (cohort 1) and 20.4% (cohort 2), and seven patients overall discontinued due to skin reactions. AEs were reported in 174 patients (87.0%), and 13 serious AEs occurred in 12 patients (6.0%), of which six patients were in cohort 1 and six patients were in cohort 2. Serious AEs were six schizophrenia (n = 6) and seven other AEs (n = 6), which included impulse-control disorder, fracture, epistaxis, asthma, pneumonia aspiration, pneumonia hemophilus, and pneumonia. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis (n = 62, 31.0%), application site erythema (n = 45, 22.5%), application site pruritus (n = 23, 11.5%), and akathisia (n = 20, 10.0%). AE incidence was similar in cohort 1 (84.5%) and cohort 2 (89.3%). Extrapyramidal and skin-related AEs were reported in 51 patients (25.5%) and 83 patients (41.5%), respectively. None of these AEs were serious. The mean change from baseline in total DIEPSS score at Week 52 {last observation carried forward [LOCF] (standard deviation [SD])} was -0.1 (1.55), indicating no marked effect. In terms of concomitant medications used in cohort 1 and cohort 2, 33.0% (32/97) and 22.3% (23/103) used antiparkinsonian drugs, respectively. The majority of skin-related AEs occurred early in treatment and were appropriately managed with topical therapies. Of the patients who answered "No" to all C-SSRS categories at baseline (n = 129), 13 patients (10.1%) were evaluated as having emergence of suicidal ideation. Among patients who answered "No" to all C-SSRS suicidal behavior categories at baseline (n = 172), one (0.6%) was evaluated as having suicidal behavior during blonanserin transdermal patch treatment. There were no clinically significant changes in laboratory tests or examinations, including prolactin level, vital signs, body weight, ECG, metabolism-related parameters, and QTc interval. The mean (SD) change in body weight was - 0.04 (4.561) kg and - 0.67 (6.841) kg in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively. The mean changes from baseline in PANSS total score at Week 52 (LOCF [SD]) were - 0.1 [11.6] and - 3.4 [15.3] in cohort 1 and 2, respectively. PANSS scores did not change after switching from tablet to patch formulation in cohort 1 and decreased over the 52 weeks of treatment with the blonanserin patches. The mean change from baseline in CGI-S score at Week 52 (LOCF [SD]) was - 0.2 [1.03] in both cohorts combined. After 52 weeks of blonanserin patch treatment, the total DAI-10 score increased or remained unchanged compared with baseline in 82 of the 129 patients (63.6%) for whom these data were available. In the intention-to-treat population of the combined cohorts (n = 200), the mean (SD) change from baseline in EQ-5D score at the last assessment was - 0.0365 (0.17603). Patients' attitudes to the blonanserin transdermal patches were generally positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Blonanserin transdermal patches are safe and effective in the long-term treatment of schizophrenia. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT02335658.

Puerarin suppresses cell growth and migration in HPV-positive cervical cancer cells by inhibiting the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway

Puerarin is an effective component that is present in high concentrations in the Pueraria lobata plant and is extensively distributed throughout nature. Puerarin possesses a number of pharmacological effects and has strong pharmacological activity with few side effects and extensive clinical applications. The aim of the present study was to explore the effects of Puerarin on the apoptosis of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive cervical cancer cells and the underlying molecular mechanisms. MTT assay, lactate dehydrogenase activity and Annexin V/fluorescein isothiocyanate/propidium iodide analysis were used to analyze cell growth of HPV-positive HeLa cervical cancer cells treated with Puerarin. Western blotting was performed to measure protein expression in the treated cells. Puerarin significantly reduced cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in HeLa cells. In addition, it was observed that Puerarin significantly enhanced caspase-3/9 activities and significantly increased B-cell lymphoma 2-asscoiate X protein expression in HeLa cells. Puerarin suppressed phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), phosphorylated (p)-protein kinase B (Akt) and p-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) protein expression in HeLa cells. These results indicate that Puerarin induces apoptosis in HPV-positive HeLa cervical cancer cells via inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling.

Risperidone ameliorates cognitive deficits, promotes hippocampal proliferation, and enhances Notch signaling in a murine model of schizophrenia

Antipsychotic agents have been reported to promote hippocampal neurogenesis and improve cognitive deficits; yet, the molecular mechanisms underlying these actions remain unclear. In the present study, we used a murine model of schizophrenia induced by 5-day intraperitoneal injection with the non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist MK801 (0.3mg/kg/day) to assess cognitive behavioral deficits, changes in Notch signaling, and cellular proliferation in the hippocampus of adult male C57BL/6 mice after 2-week administration of risperidone (Rip, 0.2mg/kg/day) or vehicle. We then utilized in vivo stereotaxic injections of a lentivirus expressing a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) for Notch1 into the dentate gyrus to examine the role of Notch1 in the observed actions of Rip. We found that Rip ameliorated cognitive deficits and restored cell proliferation in MK801-treated mice in a manner associated with the up-regulation of Notch signaling molecules, including Notch1, Hes1, and Hes5. Moreover, these effects were abolished by pretreatment with Notch1 shRNA. Our results suggest that the ability of Rip to improve cognitive function in schizophrenia is mediated in part by Notch signaling.

Risperidone-Induced Adverse Drug Reactions and Role of DRD2 (-141 C Ins/Del) and 5HTR2C (-759 C>T) Genetic Polymorphisms in Patients with Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile of risperidone and their association with dopamine (DRD2 - 141 C Ins/Del/rs1799732) and serotonin receptor (5HTR2C -759 C>T/rs3813929) gene polymorphisms in patients with schizophrenia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted among 289 patients who were diagnosed with schizophrenia and were on treatment with risperidone (4-8 mg/day)-based therapy for a minimum of 4 weeks. Genotyping was carried by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. All the patients were observed for the occurrences of ADRs during the study. Changes in prolactin levels and body weight were analyzed for a subgroup of 102 and 97 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Risperidone-induced extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs) were seen in 36.7% of patients. Among them, tremors were the most common symptom 31.8%. Risperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia and weight gain were seen in 87.2% and 53.6% in subgroup patients. Adverse effects such as sedation, gastrointestinal effects, and amenorrhea were seen in 9.7% (28/289), 5.1% (15/289), and 6.1% (7/114), respectively. Occurrence of DRD2 - 141 Ins/Del and Del/Del polymorphisms were significantly associated with increased prolactin levels in response to risperidone (odds ratio [OR] = 10.45; 95% confidence interval = 1.29-84.89, P = 0.004). No such association was observed with 5HTR2C (-759 C>T) polymorphism. Weight gain and EPS were not associated with the above genetic polymorphisms.

CONCLUSION

Hyperprolactinemia, weight gain, and EPSs (>36.7%) were common adverse effects of risperidone. DRD2 - 141C Ins/Del and Del/Del polymorphisms were significantly associated with increased prolactin levels (OR = 10.45) in response to risperidone.

A randomized trial of aripiprazole vs blonanserin for the treatment of acute schizophrenia and related disorders

OBJECTIVE

There has been no direct comparison of aripiprazole and blonanserin for schizophrenia treatment. We conducted a 24-week, rater-masked, randomized trial of aripiprazole (6-30 mg/d) vs blonanserin (4-24 mg/d) in schizophrenia patients who were not taking any antipsychotic medication for more than 2 weeks before enrollment (UMIN000011194).

METHODS

The primary outcome measure for efficacy was improvement of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at week 24. Secondary outcomes were PANSS subscale scores, 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-21) score, response rate, discontinuation rate, and individual adverse events.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were recruited. The discontinuation rate was 86.4% in the aripiprazole group and 68.2% in the blonanserin treatment group. There was no significant difference in mean time to discontinuation between the groups. Although both treatment groups showed significant reductions in the PANSS total score, PANSS subscale scores, and HAMD-21 scores at week 24, the magnitudes of the changes did not differ between the groups. There were no significant differences in the incidences of adverse events including somnolence, extrapyramidal symptoms, prolactin-related adverse events, and weight change between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest similar efficacy and safety profiles of aripiprazole and blonanserin in the patients with schizophrenia. Double-blind controlled studies are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole and blonanserin in schizophrenia.