Adjunctive ondansetron for schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Pharmacological Treatments of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia-An Update

Schizophrenia is a chronic psychotic disorder comprising positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive deficits. Negative symptoms are associated with stigma, worse functional outcomes, and a significant deterioration in quality of life. Clinical diagnosis is challenging despite its significance, and current treatments offer little improvement in the burden of negative symptoms. This article reviews current pharmacological strategies for treating negative symptoms. Dopaminergic, glutamatergic, serotonergic, noradrenergic, cholinergic, anti-inflammatory compounds, hormones, and psychostimulants are explored. Finally, we review pharmacological global treatment guidelines for negative symptoms. In general, switching to a second-generation antipsychotic seems to be most often recommended for patients with schizophrenia on first-generation antipsychotics, and an add-on antidepressant is considered when depression is also present. However, the treatment of negative symptoms remains an unmet need. Future, larger clinical studies and meta-analyses are needed to establish effective pharmacological agents for the effective treatment of negative symptoms.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cognitive-behavioral intervention techniques are increasingly demonstrating their efficacy in preventing relapses and managing problems in patients with schizophrenia. There is still variation in its effectiveness for negative symptoms, such as mood-related symptoms and motivation to engage socially.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science for English literature on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions in patients with schizophrenia. The search included randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled trials. The search period extended from the inception of the databases to September 30, 2022. Two researchers independently performed quality assessment and data extraction based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Discrepancies were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third researcher. Initially, 169 articles were retrieved through database searches and other means. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 randomized controlled studies were included in the final analysis. The intervention group comprised a total of 680 patients with schizophrenia, while the control group included 686 patients with schizophrenia. Meta-analysis results demonstrated a statistically significant difference in negative symptom reduction between the CBT intervention group (WMD = -1.19, 95% CI [-1.73, -0.66], P < .0001) and the control group.

CONCLUSION

We have analyzed the effectiveness of CBT based on our previous research, CBT was found to effectively improve negative symptoms in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.

Pharmacological management of neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment are among the core features of schizophrenia, experienced by up to 75% of patients. Available treatment options for schizophrenia including dopamine antagonists and traditional antipsychotic medications have not been shown to confer significant benefits on cognitive deficits. Contrary to the focus on management of positive symptoms in schizophrenia, cognitive abilities are main predictor of independent living skills, functional abilities, employment, engagement in relapse prevention, and patients' subjective sense of well-being and quality of life. This review aims to provide a summary of recent literature on pharmacological options for the treatment of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search of studies from 2011 to 2021 across four electronic databases including PubMed, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and Embase. Human studies using a pharmacological treatment for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia were included.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight eligible publications, representing 11 pharmacological classes, were included in this review. Major limitations involved small sample size, methodological limitations as well as heterogeneity of participants and outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall evidence remains inconclusive for any pharmacological classes studied for the treatment of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Methodological limitations in a majority of the studies rendered their findings preliminary. We further discuss possible explanations for these findings that could guide future research.

Pharmacological Treatment of Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia (CIAS) represents one of the core dimensions of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (SSD), with an important negative impact on real-world functional outcomes of people living with SSD. Treatment of CIAS represents a therapeutic goal of considerable importance, and while cognition-oriented evidence-based psychosocial interventions are available, effective pharmacological treatment could represent a game-changer in the lives of people with SSD. The present critical review reports and discusses the evidence regarding the effects of several pharmacological agents that are available in clinical practice or are under study, commenting on both current and future perspectives of CIAS treatment. In particular, the effects on CIAS of antipsychotic medications, anticholinergic medications, benzodiazepines, which are currently commonly used in the treatment of SSD, and of iclepertin, d-serine, luvadaxistat, xanomeline-trospium, ulotaront, anti-inflammatory molecules, and oxytocin, which are undergoing regulatory trials or can be considered as experimental agents, will be reported and discussed. Currently, available pharmacological agents do not appear to provide substantial benefits on CIAS, but accurate management of antipsychotic medications and avoiding treatments that can further exacerbate CIAS represent important strategies. Some molecules that are currently being investigated in Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials have provided very promising preliminary results, but more information is currently required to assess their effectiveness in real-world contexts and to provide clear recommendations regarding their use in clinical practice. The results of ongoing and future studies will reveal whether any of these molecules represents the awaited pharmacological game-changer in the treatment of CIAS.

The Less Things Change, the More They Remain the Same: Impaired Neural Plasticity as a Critical Target for Drug Development in Neuropsychiatry

Neuropsychiatric disability is related to reduced ability to change in response to clinical interventions, e.g., plasticity. Study of biomarkers and interventional strategies for plasticity, however, are sparse. In this chapter, we focus on the serial frequency discrimination task (SFDT), which is sensitive to impairments in early auditory processing (EAP) and auditory learning and has been most thoroughly studied in dyslexia and schizophrenia. In the SFDT, participants are presented with repeated paired tones ("reference" and "test") and indicate which tone is higher in pitch. Plasticity during the SFDT is critically dependent upon interactions between prefrontal "cognitive control" regions, and lower-level perceptual and motor regions that may be detected using both fMRI and time-frequency event-related potential (TF-ERP) approaches. Additionally, interactions between the cortex and striatum give insights into glutamate/dopamine interaction mechanisms. The SFDT task has been utilized in the development of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) targeted medications, which significantly modulate sensory and premotor neurophysiological activity. Deficits in pitch processing play a critical role in impaired neuro- and social cognitive function in schizophrenia and may contribute to similar impairments in dyslexia. Thus, the SFDT may be ideal for development of treatments aimed at amelioration of neuro- and social cognitive deficits across neuropsychiatric disorders.

Mismatch Negativity (MMN) as a Pharmacodynamic/Response Biomarker for NMDA Receptor and Excitatory/Inhibitory Imbalance-Targeted Treatments in Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a major mental disorder that affects approximately 0.5% of the population worldwide. Persistent negative symptoms and cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) are key features of the disorder and primary predictors of long-term disability. At the neurochemical level, both CIAS and negative symptoms are potentially attributable to dysfunction or dysregulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-mediated neurotransmission within cortical and subcortical brain regions. At present, there are no approved treatments for either CIAS or persistent negative symptoms. Development of novel treatments, moreover, is limited by the lack of biomarkers that can be used translationally across preclinical and early-stage clinical investigation. The present chapter describes the use of mismatch negativity (MMN) as a pharmacodynamic/response (PD/R) biomarker for early-stage clinical investigation of NMDAR targeted therapies for schizophrenia. MMN indexes dysfunction of early auditory processing (EAP) in schizophrenia. In humans, deficits in MMN generation contribute hierarchically to impaired cognition and functional outcome. Across humans, rodents, and primates, MMN has been linked to impaired NMDAR function and resultant disturbances in excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) balance involving interactions between glutamatergic (excitatory) pyramidal and GABAeric (inhibitory) local circuit neurons. In early-stage clinical trials, MMN has shown sensitivity to the acute effects of novel pharmacological treatments. These findings support use of MMN as a pharmacodynamic/response biomarker to support preclinical drug discovery and early-stage proof-of-mechanisms studies in schizophrenia and other related neuropsychiatric disorders.

Augmentation Therapies as Treatments for Coexisting Somatic Problems in Schizophrenia-A Systematic Review

The aim of this review is to appraise the data from available randomized clinical trials (RCT) regarding the possible combinations of neuroleptic and non-antipsychotic treatment which could enhance antipsychotic therapy efficacy whilst simultaneously addressing somatic symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia. A systematic search of the PubMed database up to February 2022 was conducted. Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials using augmentation therapy in chronic schizophrenia in adults, written in English, and only studies with psychometric assessments of schizophrenia were incorporated. Exclusion criteria: non-clinical, first episode of schizophrenia, patients on medication other than antipsychotics augmented, and not adjunctive therapy. Overall, 37 studies of 1931 patients with schizophrenia who received a combination of antipsychotic medication with other drugs were selected. A statistically significant reduction of negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia, measured with the PANSS scale, when using a combination of antipsychotic treatment along with aspirin, simvastatin, N-acetylcysteine, or pioglitazone was found. A combination of antipsychotic medication with aspirin, simvastatin, N-acetylcysteine, or pioglitazone seems to be effective in the reduction of symptoms of schizophrenia in adults, but long-term studies are required to confirm this effect.

Safety and Efficacy of Ondansetron and Simvastatin as Potential Adjunctive Treatment for Patients With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

In a generation where advancements in research and understanding have led to remarkable achievements in medicine, it is still unfathomable that, after more than a century, the cause of schizophrenia is still a mystery. While antipsychotics, without a doubt, have brought on an exemplary revolution in the way psychiatric disorders are now treated, there are still imperative deficits that need to be addressed to ultimately enable individuals with schizophrenia to function normally in society. However, without a definite cause of schizophrenia, even though speculation has been made on its inflammatory and neurodegenerative nature, it has provided an unnecessary hindrance to finding further potential treatment modalities for these patients. Nevertheless, some trials are investigating potential adjunctive treatment regimens to antipsychotics, which can help achieve complete remission. Exploring these drugs will have significant implications for managing schizophrenia in future clinical practices. This systematic review was conducted between January 2012 to July 2022 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ondansetron and simvastatin as adjunctive treatment to antipsychotics in adult patients with schizophrenia. This review included nine randomized controlled trials. Overall, both simvastatin and ondansetron, when used as adjunctive treatment in schizophrenia, appear to be safe. Ondansetron showed promising results, with all studies on this drug showing positive overall results on schizophrenia symptoms. On the other hand, simvastatin demonstrated mixed results, which can be attributed to the limited participants in the studies and the shorter duration of the trials. However, more extensive trials with uniform assessment tools are needed to demonstrate concrete evidence of the effectiveness of these drugs, whether alone or in combination with each other or perhaps another drug such as aspirin in schizophrenia.

Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia: From Pathophysiology to Treatment

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia and a major contributor to poor functional outcomes. Methods for assessment of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia are now well established. In addition, there has been increasing appreciation in recent years of the additional role of social cognitive impairment in driving functional outcomes and of the contributions of sensory-level dysfunction to higher-order impairments. At the neurochemical level, acute administration of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists reproduces the pattern of neurocognitive dysfunction associated with schizophrenia, encouraging the development of treatments targeted at both NMDAR and its interactome. At the local-circuit level, an auditory neurophysiological measure, mismatch negativity, has emerged both as a veridical index of NMDAR dysfunction and excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in schizophrenia and as a critical biomarker for early-stage translational drug development. Although no compounds have yet been approved for treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia, several candidates are showing promise in early-phase testing.

Management of cognitive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia

Currently available antipsychotics provide only modest benefit in managing the cognitive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia even though these symptoms are often the most impairing in patients' daily lives. Certain antipsychotics may have slight benefits over others, and several nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic adjunctive treatments have been evaluated in recent clinical trials. Recently published meta-analyses and clinical studies of such treatments are reviewed. Potential strategies to manage cognitive and negative symptoms, including deprescribing of medications that may exacerbate these symptoms, are described using theoretical case examples.

Mirtazapine in schizophrenia - an undeservedly overlooked option?

Mirtazapine has often been prescribed as add-on treatment for schizophrenia in patients with suboptimal response to conventional treatments. In this review, we evaluate the existing evidence for efficacy and effectiveness of add-on mirtazapine in schizophrenia and reappraise the practical and theoretical aspects of mirtazapine-antipsychotic combinations. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), mirtazapine demonstrated favourable effects on negative and cognitive (although plausibly not depressive) symptoms, with no risk of psychotic exacerbation. Mirtazapine also may have a desirable effect on antipsychotic-induced sexual dysfunction, but seems not to alleviate extrapyramidal symptoms, at least if combined with second-generation antipsychotics. It is noteworthy that all published RCTs have been underpowered and relatively short in duration. In the only large pragmatic effectiveness study that provided analyses by add-on antidepressant, only mirtazapine was associated with both decreased rate of hospital admissions and number of in-patient days. Mirtazapine hardly affects the pharmacokinetics of antipsychotics. However, possible pharmacodynamic interactions (sedation and metabolic offence) should be borne in mind. The observed desired clinical effects of mirtazapine may be due to its specific receptor-blocking properties. Alternative theoretical explanations include its possible neuroprotective effect. Further well-designed RCTs and real-world effectiveness studies are needed to determine whether add-on mirtazapine should be recommended for difficult-to-treat schizophrenia.

The Pharmacological Treatment of Pediatric Vertigo

Vertigo in children is a challenging topic. The lack of dedicated trials, guidelines and papers causes inhomogeneity in the treatment of vertigo in children. Meniere’s disease, migraine equivalents, vestibular neuritis, paroxysmal positional benign vertigo (BPPV), persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) and motion sickness may affect children with various degrees of incidence and clinical severity compared to adults. Several drugs are proposed for the management of these conditions, even if their use is subordinated to the child’s age. In this review, we summarize the existing evidence related to the use of drugs for this clinical condition in children as a start point for new trials, stating the urgent need for international guidelines.

Selective 5HT3 antagonists and sensory processing: a systematic review

Ondansetron is a selective serotonin (5HT3) receptor antagonist that is under evaluation as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia, and a novel treatment for hallucinations in Parkinson's disease. Ondansetron reverses sensory gating deficits and improves visuoperceptual processing in animal models of psychosis, but it is unclear to what extent preclinical findings have been replicated in humans. We systematically reviewed human studies that evaluated the effects of ondansetron and other 5HT3 receptor antagonists on sensory gating deficits or sensory processing. Of 11 eligible studies, eight included patients with schizophrenia who were chronically stable on antipsychotic medication; five measured sensory gating using the P50 suppression response to a repeated auditory stimulus; others included tests of visuoperceptual function. Three studies in healthy participants included tests of visuoperceptual and sensorimotor function. A consistent and robust finding (five studies) was that ondansetron and tropisetron (5HT3 antagonist and α7-nicotinic receptor partial agonist) improved sensory gating in patients with schizophrenia. Tropisetron also improved sustained visual attention in non-smoking patients. There was inconsistent evidence of the effects of 5HT3 antagonists on other measures of sensory processing, but interpretation was limited by the small number of studies, methodological heterogeneity and the potential confounding effects of concomitant medication in patients. Despite these limitations, we found strong evidence that selective 5HT3 antagonists (with or without direct α7-nicotinic partial agonist effects) improved sensory gating. Future studies should investigate how this relates to potential improvement in neurocognitive symptoms in antipsychotic naive patients with prodromal or milder symptoms, in order to understand the clinical implications.

Mismatch negativity as an index of target engagement for excitation/inhibition-based treatment development: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-dose cross-over study of the serotonin type-3 receptor antagonist CVN058

Serotonin type-3 receptor (5-HT₃R) antagonists show potential as a treatment for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. CVN058, a brain-penetrant, potent and selective 5-HT₃R antagonist, shows efficacy in rodent models of cognition and was well-tolerated in Phase-1 studies. We evaluated the target engagement of CVN058 using mismatch negativity (MMN) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Subjects were stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder treated with antipsychotics. Subjects were not permitted to use other 5-HT₃R modulators or serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Each subject received a high (150 mg) and low (15 mg or 75 mg) oral dose of CVN058 and placebo in a randomized order across 3 single-day treatment visits separated by at least 1 week. The primary pre-registered outcome was amplitude of duration MMN. Amplitude of other MMN deviants (frequency, intensity, frequency modulation, and location), P50, P300 and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) were exploratory endpoints. 19 of 22 randomized subjects (86.4%) completed the study. Baseline PANSS scores indicated moderate impairment. CVN058 150 mg led to significant improvement vs. placebo on the primary outcome of duration MMN (p = 0.02, Cohen's d = 0.48). A significant treatment effect was also seen in a combined analysis across all MMN deviants (p < 0.001, d = 0.57). Effects on location MMN were independently significant (p < 0.007, d = 0.46). No other significant effects were seen for other deviants, doses or EEG measures. There were no clinically significant treatment related adverse effects. These results show MMN to be a sensitive target engagement biomarker for 5-HT₃R, and support the potential utility of CVN058 in correcting the excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in schizophrenia.

Tapping into 5-HT3 Receptors to Modify Metabolic and Immune Responses

5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT₃) receptors are ligand gated ion channels, which clearly distinguish their mode of action from the other G-protein coupled 5-HT or serotonin receptors. 5-HT₃ receptors are well established targets for emesis and gastrointestinal mobility and are used as adjunct targets in treating schizophrenia. However, the distribution of these receptors is wider than the nervous system and there is potential that these additional sites can be targeted to modulate inflammatory and/or metabolic conditions. Recent progress in structural biology and pharmacology of 5-HT₃ receptors have provided profound insights into mechanisms of their action. These advances, combined with insights into clinical relevance of mutations in genes encoding 5-HT₃ subunits and increasing understanding of their implications in patient's predisposition to diseases and response to the treatment, open new avenues for personalized precision medicine. In this review, we recap on the current status of 5-HT₃ receptor-based therapies using a biochemical and physiological perspective. We assess the potential for targeting 5-HT₃ receptors in conditions involving metabolic or inflammatory disorders based on recent findings, underscoring the challenges and limitations of this approach.

Toward Predicting Impact of Common Genetic Variants on Schizophrenia Clinical Responses With Antipsychotics: A Quantitative System Pharmacology Study

CNS disorders are lagging behind other indications in implementing genotype-dependent treatment algorithms for personalized medicine. This report uses a biophysically realistic computer model of an associative and dorsal motor cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical loop and a working memory cortical model to investigate the pharmacodynamic effects of COMTVal158Met rs4680, 5-HTTLPR rs 25531 s/L and D2DRTaq1A1 genotypes on the clinical response of 7 antipsychotics. The effect of the genotypes on dopamine and serotonin dynamics and the level of target exposure for the drugs was calibrated from PET displacement studies. The simulations suggest strong gene-gene pharmacodynamic interactions unique to each antipsychotic. For PANSS Total, the D2DRTaq1 allele has the biggest impact, followed by the 5-HTTLPR rs25531. The A2A2 genotype improved efficacy for all drugs, with a more complex outcome for the 5-HTTLPR rs25531 genotype. Maximal range in PANSS Total for all 27 individual combinations is 3 (aripiprazole) to 5 points (clozapine). The 5-HTTLPR L/L with aripiprazole and risperidone and the D2DRTaq1A2A2 allele with haloperidol, clozapine and quetiapine reduce the motor side-effects with opposite effects for the s/s genotype. The COMT genotype has a limited effect on antipsychotic effect and EPS. For cognition, the COMT MM 5-HTTLPR L/L genotype combination has the best performance for all antipsychotics, except clozapine. Maximal difference is 25% of the total dynamic range in a 2-back working memory task. Aripiprazole is the medication that is best suited for the largest number of genotype combinations (10) followed by Clozapine and risperidone (6), haloperidol and olanzapine (3) and quetiapine and paliperidone for one genotype. In principle, the platform could identify the best antipsychotic treatment balancing efficacy and side-effects for a specific individual genotype. Once the predictions of this platform are validated in a clinical setting the platform has potential to support rational personalized treatment guidance in clinical practice.

Cognitive Deficit in Schizophrenia: From Etiology to Novel Treatments

Schizophrenia is a major mental illness characterized by positive and negative symptoms, and by cognitive deficit. Although cognitive impairment is disabling for patients, it has been largely neglected in the treatment of schizophrenia. There are several reasons for this lack of treatments for cognitive deficit, but the complexity of its etiology-in which neuroanatomic, biochemical and genetic factors concur-has contributed to the lack of effective treatments. In the last few years, there have been several attempts to develop novel drugs for the treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Despite these efforts, little progress has been made. The latest findings point to the importance of developing personalized treatments for schizophrenia which enhance neuroplasticity, and of combining pharmacological treatments with non-pharmacological measures.

Contrasting Typical and Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs

The beliefs that antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are 1) effective only to treat delusions and hallucinations (positive symptoms), 2) that typical and atypical APDs differ only in ability to cause extrapyramidal side effects, and 3) that their efficacy as antipsychotics is due solely to their dopamine D₂ receptor blockade are outmoded concepts that prevent clinicians from achieving optimal clinical results when prescribing an APD. Atypical APDs are often more effective than typical APDs in treating negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, and mood symptoms as well as reducing the risk for suicide and decreasing aggression. This applies not only to those diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder but also to bipolar disorder, major depression, and other psychiatric diagnoses. The greater advantage of an atypical APD is not evident in all patients for every atypical APD due, in part, to individual differences in genetic and epigenetic endowment and differences in the pharmacology of the atypical APDs, their mode of action being far more complex than that of the typical APDs. A common misconception is that among the atypical APDs, only clozapine is effective for reducing psychosis in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Aripiprazole, lurasidone, olanzapine, and risperidone also can be more effective than typical APDs for treatment-resistant schizophrenia; clozapine is uniquely indicated for reducing the risk for suicide. The ability of the atypical APDs to improve cognition and negative symptoms in some patients together with lower propensity to cause tardive dyskinesia (an underappreciated advantage) leads to better overall outcomes. These advantages of the atypical APDs in efficacy and safety are due, in part, to initiation of synaptic plasticity via direct and indirect effects of the atypical APDs on a variety of proteins, especially G proteins, and release of neurotrophins (e.g., brain-derived neurotrophic factor). The typical APDs beneficial effects on psychosis are mainly the result of D₂ receptor blockade, which can be associated with serious side effects and lack of tolerability.

Serotonin/dopamine interaction: Electrophysiological and neurochemical evidence

The interaction between serotonin (5-HT) and dopamine (DA) in the central nervous system (CNS) plays an important role in the adaptive properties of living animals to their environment. These are two modulatory, divergent systems shaping and regulating in a widespread manner the activity of neurobiological networks and their interaction. The concept of one interaction linking these two systems is rather elusive when looking at the mechanisms triggered by these two systems across the CNS. The great variety of their interacting mechanisms is in part due to the diversity of their neuronal origin, the density of their fibers in a given CNS region, the distinct expression of their numerous receptors in the CNS, the heterogeneity of their intracellular signaling pathway that depend on the cellular type expressing their receptors, and the state of activity of neurobiological networks, conditioning the outcome of their mutual influences. Thus, originally conceptualized as inhibition of 5-HT on DA neuron activity and DA neurotransmission, this interaction is nowadays considered as a multifaceted, mutual influence of these two systems in the regulation of CNS functions. These new ways of understanding this interaction are of utmost importance to envision the consequences of their dysfunctions underlined in several CNS diseases. It is also essential to conceive the mechanism of action of psychotropic drugs directly acting on their function including antipsychotic, antidepressant, antiparkinsonian, and drug of abuse together with the development of therapeutic strategies of Alzheimer's diseases, epilepsy, obsessional compulsive disorders. The 5-HT/DA interaction has a long history from the serendipitous discovery of antidepressants and antipsychotics to the future, rationalized treatments of CNS disorders.

Serotonin modulation of hippocampal functions: From anatomy to neurotherapeutics

The hippocampal region receives a dense serotoninergic innervation originating from both medial and dorsal raphe nuclei. This innervation regulates hippocampal activity through the activation of distinct receptor families that are expressed in excitatory and inhibitory neurons, terminals of several afferent neurotransmitter systems, and glial cells. Preclinical and clinical studies indicate that hippocampal dysfunctions are involved in learning and memory deficits, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy and mood disorders such as anxiety, depression and post-traumatic syndrome disorder, whereas the hippocampus participates also in the therapeutic mechanisms of numerous medicines. Not surprisingly, several drugs acting via 5-HT mechanisms are efficacious to some extent in some diseases and the link between 5-HT and the hippocampus although clear remains difficult to untangle. For this reason, we review reported data concerning the distribution and the functional roles of the 5-HT receptors in the hippocampal region in health and disease. The impact of the 5-HT systems on the hippocampal function is such that the research of new 5-HT mechanisms and drugs is still very active. It concerns notably drugs acting at the 5-HT_1A,_2A,_2C,_4,6 receptor subtypes, in addition to the already existing drugs including the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Emerging 5-HT receptor antagonists for the treatment of Schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION

While antipsychotics have been generally successful in treating psychosis in schizophrenia, there is a major treatment gap for negative symptoms and cognitive deficits. Given that these aspects of the disease contribute to poor functional outcomes independently of positive symptoms, treatments would have profound implications for quality of life. The 5-HT_2A- receptor has been considered a potential target for interventions aimed at negative and cognitive symptoms and multiple antagonists and inverse agonists of this receptor have been tested.

AREAS COVERED

Ritanserin and volinanserin, are historically important compounds in this area, while pimavanserin, roluperidone, and lumateperone are either newly approved, in late stages of development, or currently being tested for efficacy in schizophrenia-related features. The focus will be on their efficacy in the treatment of negative symptoms, with a limited secondary discussion of cognition.

EXPERT OPINION

In addition to their efficacy in treating negative symptoms and cognition, these compounds may also have a role in modulating antipsychotic-induced dopamine super-sensitivity and preventing relapse. They may also show efficacy in treating patients with milder symptoms such as patients with schizotypal personality disorder and attenuated psychosis syndrome. Their utility may also expand outside the spectrum of schizophrenia to encompass Parkinson's Disease psychosis, major depression, bipolar depression, and dementia-associated apathy.