Moderators and predictors of response to deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Clinical efficacy of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) in psychiatric and cognitive disorders: A systematic review

Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) has gained attention as an enhanced form of traditional TMS, targeting broader and deeper regions of the brain. However, a fulsome synthesis of dTMS efficacy across psychiatric and cognitive disorders using sham-controlled trials is lacking. We systematically reviewed 28 clinical trials comparing active dTMS to a sham/controlled condition to characterize dTMS efficacy across diverse psychiatric and cognitive disorders. A comprehensive search of APA PsycINFO, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PubMed databases was conducted. Predominant evidence supports dTMS efficacy in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD; n = 2), substance use disorders (SUDs; n = 8), and in those experiencing depressive episodes with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD; n = 6). However, the clinical efficacy of dTMS in psychiatric disorders characterized by hyperactivity or hyperarousal (i.e., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and schizophrenia) was heterogeneous. Common side effects included headaches and pain/discomfort, with rare but serious adverse events such as seizures and suicidal ideation/attempts. Risk of bias ratings indicated a collectively low risk according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations checklist (Meader et al., 2014). Literature suggests promise for dTMS as a beneficial alternative or add-on treatment for patients who do not respond well to traditional treatment, particularly for depressive episodes, OCD, and SUDs. Mixed evidence and limited clinical trials for other psychiatric and cognitive disorders suggest more extensive research is warranted. Future research should examine the durability of dTMS interventions and identify moderators of clinical efficacy.

A meta-analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation in Tourette syndrome

There is growing enthusiasm for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders using neuromodulation. While some reports claim that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to treat Tourette Syndrome (TS), little research exists to support this assertion. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of TMS to reduce tic severity in patients with TS. Additionally, it explored the effect of TMS to reduce premonitory urge severity-the primary mechanism implicated in the frontline evidence-based treatment of TS. Five treatment comparisons were selected using PRISMA guidelines. All studies included were required to be (1) a randomized controlled trial, (2) compare TMS to a sham condition, and (3) have all participants meet diagnostic criteria for a persistent tic disorder and/or TS. A random effects model meta-analysis examined the efficacy of using TMS to reduce tic severity and explored the effect of TMS to reduce premonitory urge severity. TMS did not significantly reduce tic severity (g = 0.44; 95% CI = -0.17, 1.05; z = 1.40; p = 0.16), but a moderate reduction in premonitory urge severity was found (g = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.9, 1.17; z = 2.27; p < 0.02). Trials with larger sample sizes and a preponderance of women were found to have greater therapeutic effects of TMS for tic severity. There is limited support for the use of TMS to reduce tic severity, though reductions in premonitory urge severity were observed. Major limitations of the existing literature are examined, with a call for research investigating newer TMS protocols and their use as a treatment augmentation strategy.

Depressive symptoms during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation or sham treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that depressive symptoms tend to improve concurrently with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms during cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), despite depression not being the primary target of intervention. Studies examining the temporal or mediational relationships of OCD and depressive symptoms have indicated a bidirectional relationship, as prior levels of OCD symptoms influenced subsequent levels of depression, and vice versa. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) has recently emerged as a treatment option for OCD. Whether dTMS affects depression symptoms similarly to CBT remains to be examined.

METHODS

The current study employed a random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) to examine the relationship of OCD and depression symptoms in 94 treatment refractory patients, undergoing dTMS or sham treatment.

RESULTS

Both OCD and depression symptoms improved significantly. However, a stable, cross-lagged relationship between the variables was not supported. Changes in one symptom domain could not be used to predict the other.

LIMITATIONS

The present study was conducted in a treatment refractory population, meaning the present findings may not generalize to treatment naïve patients or those with less severe OCD symptoms. It is unclear whether the study was sufficiently powered to detect the effects of interest, and this concern also meant that examining the dTMS and sham groups independently was not feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

When treating OCD with dTMS, depression symptoms appear likely to diminish but should be monitored throughout, and additional interventions applied if needed.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients need novel therapeutic interventions since most experience residual symptoms despite treatment. Converging evidence suggest that OCD involves dysfunction of limbic cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loops, including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), that tends to normalize with successful treatment. Recently, three repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) coils were FDA-cleared for treatment-refractory OCD. This review presents on-label and off-label clinical evidence and relevant physical characteristics of the three coils. The Deep TMS™ H7 Coil studies' point to efficacy of mPFC-dACC stimulation, while no clear target stems from the small heterogenous D-B80 and figure-8 coils studies.

Static and temporal dynamic changes of intrinsic brain activity in pediatric and adults OCD

Epidemiological and clinical age differences in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been reported in clinical symptoms and morphometry changes; however, age differences in amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation and the relationship between ALFF imaging and clinical symptoms has not been thoroughly studied in OCD. Age may be an important feature associated with distinct subtypes of OCD. To examine the effect of age on OCD, the current study enrolled 92 OCD patients (32 pediatrics and 60 adults) and matched HCs (33 pediatrics and 84 adults), undergoing resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. The spontaneous brain activity was measured by static and dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) followed by two-way ANOVA. In pediatric OCD patients versus adult patients, we observed a significantly higher ALFF in the default mode network (DMN), including posterior cingulate, precuneus and superior frontal gyrus, and extending to cuneus, lingual gyrus. Additionally, the increased ALFF and dynamic ALFF in the precentral gyrus were found in pediatric patients. In OCD patients compared with controls, we found a significantly increased ALFF in hippocampal gyrus, cerebellum network (CN), and the dALFF in middle and inferior occipital gyrus, bilateral paracentral lobule and sensorimotor network. The findings emphasized the different patterns of static and dynamic intrinsic brain activity alterations associated with pediatric and adult OCD patients. These results provide unique insights into constructing evidenced-based distinct OCD subtypes based on brain activity and point the need of specified management for pediatric and adult OCD patients in clinical setting.

The prefrontal cortex and OCD

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a highly prevalent and severe neuropsychiatric disorder, with an incidence of 1.5-3% worldwide. However, despite the clear public health burden of OCD and relatively well-defined symptom criteria, effective treatments are still limited, spotlighting the need for investigation of the neural substrates of the disorder. Human neuroimaging studies have consistently highlighted abnormal activity patterns in prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions and connected circuits in OCD during both symptom provocation and performance of neurocognitive tasks. Because of recent technical advances, these findings can now be leveraged to develop novel targeted interventions. Here we will highlight current theories regarding the role of the prefrontal cortex in the generation of OCD symptoms, discuss ways in which this knowledge can be used to improve treatments for this often disabling illness, and lay out challenges in the field for future study.

Deep TMS H7 Coil: Features, Applications & Future

INTRODUCTION

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) uses magnetic pulses to induce electrical current in the underlying neuronal tissue. A variety of TMS coils exist on the market, differing primarily in configuration, orientation, and flexibility of the wire windings of the coil. Deep TMS^TM utilizes H-Coils, flexible coils with different configurations for stimulating different brain regions implicated in different neuropsychiatric disorders. The H7 Coil, designed to target primarily the medial prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex, is FDA-cleared for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It was chosen as the focus of this review since it recently showed promise in various neuropsychiatric populations in addition to growing understanding of its mechanism of action (MOA).

AREAS COVERED

Here we assembled all peer-reviewed publications on the H7 Coil to showcase its efficacy in: (a) various OCD patient populations (e.g., different degrees of symptom severity, treatment resistance, comorbidities) (b) other neuropsychiatric populations (e.g., addiction, major depressive disorder and autism spectrum disorder).

EXPERT OPINION

While substantial evidence pertaining to the H7 Coil's efficacy as well as its MOA has accumulated, much work remains. In the final section of this review, we highlight areas of ongoing and future research that will further elucidate the coil's MOA as well as its full efficacy potential.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Potential Treatment for Obesity in Patients with Schizophrenia

Obesity is highly prevalent in patients with schizophrenia and, in association with metabolic syndrome, contributes to premature deaths of patients due to cardiovascular disease complications. Moreover, pharmacologic, and behavioral interventions have not stemmed the tide of obesity in schizophrenia. Therefore, novel effective interventions are urgently needed. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown efficacy for inducing weight loss in obese non-psychiatric samples but this promising intervention has not been evaluated as a weight loss intervention in patients with schizophrenia. In this narrative review, we describe three brain mechanisms (hypothalamic inflammation, dysregulated mesocorticolimbic reward system, and impaired prefrontal cortex function) implicated in the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of obesity and emphasize how the three mechanisms have also been implicated in the neurobiology of schizophrenia. We then argue that, based on the three overlapping brain mechanisms in obesity and schizophrenia, rTMS would be effective as a weight loss intervention in patients with schizophrenia and comorbid obesity. We end this review by describing how deep TMS, relative to conventional TMS, could potentially result in larger effect size for weight loss. While this review is mainly conceptual and based on an extrapolation of findings from non-schizophrenia samples, our aim is to stimulate research in the use of rTMS for weight loss in patients with schizophrenia.