Construct validity of DSM-5 cannabis use disorder diagnosis and severity levels in adults with problematic substance use

Cannabis use disorder and substance use treatment among U.S. adults

INTRODUCTION

Recent expansion of cannabis legalization in multiple states calls for reexamination of the prevalence of cannabis use, cannabis use disorder (CUD), and the associations between CUD severity and substance use treatment. We used Andersen's behavioral model of healthcare use as the conceptual/analytic framework for examining treatment use.

METHODS

We used data from the 2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; N = 47,100, age 18+) to describe the prevalence of past-year cannabis use, CUD and CUD severity, other substance use disorders, and substance use treatment. We compared sociodemographic, mental health, healthcare use, and cannabis and other substance use characteristics by CUD severity. Finally, we used logistic regression models to examine the associations between CUD severity and substance use treatment.

RESULTS

Of the U.S. adult population, 23.0 % used cannabis in the past year; 7.0 % had a CUD (3.9 % mild, 1.9 % moderate, and 1.2 % severe CUD); and 4.7 % received substance use treatment. Of past-year cannabis users, 30.3 % had CUD (16.9 % mild, 8.4 % moderate, and 5.0 % severe CUD), and 9.6 % received substance use treatment. Cannabis users had 3-4 times higher rates of other substance use disorders than nonusers. Of those with CUD, 38.4 % had moderate/severe mental illness, 52.4 % had other substance use disorders, and 16.5 % received substance use treatment. Among all cannabis users, moderate (aOR [adjusted odds ratios] = 1.48, 95 % CI = 1.03-2.13) and severe (aOR = 2.57, 95 % CI = 1.60-4.11) CUDs were associated with greater odds of substance use treatment. Among cannabis users without nicotine dependence and alcohol, opioid, tranquilizer/sedative, and stimulant use disorders, only severe CUD (aOR = 6.03, 95 % CI = 3.37-10.78) was associated with greater odds of substance use treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows increased prevalence of cannabis use and CUD among U.S. adults, and with or without other substance use disorders, CUD was associated with greater odds of substance use treatment. However, the overall low rate of treatment use among those with CUD is concerning. Healthcare providers need to provide education for both medical and recreational users on the development of tolerance and dependence. Harm reduction strategies to minimize the negative consequences of CUD are also needed.

Treatment demand for cannabis use problems: analyses of routine data from 30 European countries

Cannabis use and treatment demand has risen in the past decade. Previous analyses of treatment demand are limited by methodological constraints or are outdated. Cross-country differences and trends in cannabis treatment demand are described using data from the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Two novel indicators are employed: firstly, the cannabis-attributable treatment fraction (CATF) is obtained by dividing the number of treatment entrants for cannabis use problems by the number of treatment entrants for any substance use problem, accounting for possible changes in the reporting system. Secondly, comparing the number of treatment entrants for cannabis use problems to the number of people who use cannabis (near) daily yields the treated-user-ratio (TUR), which considers a proxy for treatment need (frequent use). Across 30 countries with available data, the importance of cannabis in European treatment facilities varies greatly (CATF: min = 3%; max = 65%), with lower estimates in Eastern European countries. Across 20 countries with complete data, the CATF has risen from 29.4% in 2013 to 37.1% in 2020. The TUR calculated on 26 countries suggests that about 3 in 100 frequent users have sought treatment for their cannabis use problems. Over time, treatment demand has increased at a slower pace than treatment need in most countries. One in three treatment entrants for substance use problems in Europe are due to cannabis, with large variations between countries. There are indications for a widening treatment gap for cannabis use problems. In countries liberalising cannabis laws, monitoring changes in treatment access and demand is warranted.

Unhealthy behaviors associated with mental health disorders: a systematic comparative review of diet quality, sedentary behavior, and cannabis and tobacco use

Background

There are well-established literatures documenting the associations between mental disorders and unhealthy behaviors such as poor diet quality, sedentary behavior, and cannabis and tobacco use. Few studies have attempted to understand the respective findings in light of each other, however.

Objective

The purpose of this review was to assemble comparable data for each behavior-disorder association and assess the associations in terms of their overall strength. The review aimed to include a representative, but not exhaustive, range of studies that would allow for explorative comparisons.

Methods

Eligible studies were identified via Pubmed searches and citation searching, restricted to publications no older than 2015 written in English. To obtain comparable data, only studies that reported findings as odds ratios were included, and risk of bias related to study samples, behavioral measurement disparities, and control variables was assessed via sensitivity analyses. Findings for each disorder were compared on the basis of different measures of central tendency.

Results

From 3,682 records, 294 studies were included. The review found evidence of associations between each of the four unhealthy behaviors and psychosis, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while personality disorder was only investigated in relation to cannabis and tobacco use. In overall comparison, the associations were generally of similar strength, and only the association between cannabis use and personality disorder was exceptional in terms of being significantly stronger than its counterparts across disorders and across behaviors. Analyses of bias risk identified some influence from behavioral measurement disparities and lack of adequate statistical control, but findings were generally robust across a range of sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

This explorative and comparative review found that poor diet quality, sedentary behavior, and cannabis and tobacco use are about equally strongly associated with a range of different mental disorders. Given the general nature of these associations, we should probably understand them to reflect a general and shared etiology. However, the findings in this review should be regarded as tentative until confirmed by more comprehensive investigations.

Neurophysiological error processing and addiction self-awareness correlates of reduced insight in cannabis use disorder

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) prevalence has increased, while perceived risks of cannabis use and CUD treatment need have decreased. Chronic cannabis use may also impair the neural and behavioral mechanisms of insight, further hampering treatment-seeking. This study aimed to measure whether CUD is characterized by reduced self-monitoring in drug-related contexts (objectively-assessed insight), subserved by functional neural abnormalities in error-processing and manifested clinically as decreased awareness of the need to change.

DESIGN

Case-control laboratory study was used.

SETTING

University setting was in Alabama, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

There were 42 CUD participants and 47 age-, sex-, and nicotine use-matched controls.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants completed a probabilistic choice task, adapted for the first time for CUD, in which they selected pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and cannabis-related images according to their preference. Reduced versus accurate insight was operationalized as the correspondence between self-reported and actual most chosen image type. Neurophysiological error-processing during an inhibitory control task was recorded using electroencephalography. Participants with CUD completed measures of cannabis problem recognition and motivation to change.

FINDINGS

Compared with controls, the CUD group made significantly more cannabis selections on the choice task (mean difference [MD] = 8.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] [4.88 11.35], p < 0.001) and had significantly reduced insight into cannabis choice (odds ratio [OR] = 9.69, 95% CI [1.06 88.65], p = 0.04). CUD participants with reduced insight on the choice task had significantly decreased neurophysiological reactivity to errors on the inhibitory control task (error-related negativity) compared with CUD participants with accurate insight (MD = 2.64 μV, 95% CI [0.74 μV 4.54 μV], p = 0.008) and controls (MD = 4.05 μV, 95% CI [1.29 μV 6.80 μV], p = 0.005). Compared with CUD participants with accurate insight on the choice task, CUD participants with reduced insight reported significantly less agreement that they had a cannabis problem (MD = -5.06, 95% CI [-8.49-1.62], p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

People with CUD who show reduced insight on a drug-related choice task may also have decreased early neural error-processing and less cannabis problem recognition.