Expanding crystallization tools for nucleic acid complexes using U1A protein variants

Molecular Complementarity of Proteomimetic Materials for Target-Specific Recognition and Recognition-Mediated Complex Functions

As biomolecules essential for sustaining life, proteins are generated from long chains of 20 different α-amino acids that are folded into unique 3D structures. In particular, many proteins have molecular recognition functions owing to their binding pockets, which have complementary shapes, charges, and polarities for specific targets, making these biopolymers unique and highly valuable for biomedical and biocatalytic applications. Based on the understanding of protein structures and microenvironments, molecular complementarity can be exhibited by synthesizable and modifiable materials. This has prompted researchers to explore the proteomimetic potentials of a diverse range of materials, including biologically available peptides and oligonucleotides, synthetic supramolecules, inorganic molecules, and related coordination networks. To fully resemble a protein, proteomimetic materials perform the molecular recognition to mediate complex molecular functions, such as allosteric regulation, signal transduction, enzymatic reactions, and stimuli-responsive motions; this can also expand the landscape of their potential bio-applications. This review focuses on the recognitive aspects of proteomimetic designs derived for individual materials and their conformations. Recent progress provides insights to help guide the development of advanced protein mimicry with material heterogeneity, design modularity, and tailored functionality. The perspectives and challenges of current proteomimetic designs and tools are also discussed in relation to future applications.

Structural studies of protein-nucleic acid complexes: A brief overview of the selected techniques

Protein-nucleic acid complexes are involved in all vital processes, including replication, transcription, translation, regulation of gene expression and cell metabolism. Knowledge of the biological functions and molecular mechanisms beyond the activity of the macromolecular complexes can be determined from their tertiary structures. Undoubtably, performing structural studies of protein-nucleic acid complexes is challenging, mainly because these types of complexes are often unstable. In addition, their individual components may display extremely different surface charges, causing the complexes to precipitate at higher concentrations used in many structural studies. Due to the variety of protein-nucleic acid complexes and their different biophysical properties, no simple and universal guideline exists that helps scientists chose a method to successfully determine the structure of a specific protein-nucleic acid complex. In this review, we provide a summary of the following experimental methods, which can be applied to study the structures of protein-nucleic acid complexes: X-ray and neutron crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), small angle scattering (SAS) methods, circular dichroism (CD) and infrared (IR) spectroscopy. Each method is discussed regarding its historical context, advancements over the past decades and recent years, and weaknesses and strengths. When a single method does not provide satisfactory data on the selected protein-nucleic acid complex, a combination of several methods should be considered as a hybrid approach; thus, specific structural problems can be solved when studying protein-nucleic acid complexes.

Obtaining Crystals of Nucleic Acids in Complex with the Protein U1A Using the Soaking Method

X-ray crystallography is one of the most prominent techniques for determining high-resolution structures of nucleic acids. The major challenges are to obtain well-diffracting single crystals and to solve the phase problem. The absence of structural information impedes the elucidation of the molecular details of biological processes. A particularly intriguing example is the RNA-cleavage catalyzed by the 10-23 deoxyribozyme (DNAzyme). This DNAzyme consists of a catalytic core that is flanked by two substrate binding arms, which can be designed to bind any RNA of interest. Structure elucidation of the 10-23 DNAzyme in a biologically relevant conformation faces three major challenges: (1) stabilization of the RNA substrate to capture the DNA:RNA complex in the pre-catalytic conformation, (2) prevention of the formation of an artificial duplex conformation due to a self-complementary sequence in the catalytic core of the DNAzyme, and (3) the crystallization of nucleic acids with their uniform surfaces. Here, we provide a protocol for an innovative strategy facilitating the crystallization of protein:nucleic acid complexes using a soaking approach and discuss on how to apply this protocol for the structure elucidation of the 10-23 DNAzyme. For this purpose, we describe the purification procedure of an optimized variant of the RNA-binding protein U1A, the crystallization of this specific U1A variant, the soaking process with its specific RNA hairpin loop, and finally suggest a strategy for applying this procedure on the 10-23 DNAzyme in complex with its specific RNA target.

Affinity and Structural Analysis of the U1A RNA Recognition Motif with Engineered Methionines to Improve Experimental Phasing

RNA plays a central role in all organisms and can fold into complex structures to orchestrate function. Visualization of such structures often requires crystallization, which can be a bottleneck in the structure-determination process. To promote crystallization, an RNA-recognition motif (RRM) of the U1A spliceosomal protein has been co-opted as a crystallization module. Specifically, the U1-snRNA hairpin II (hpII) single-stranded loop recognized by U1A can be transplanted into an RNA target to promote crystal contacts and to attain phase information via molecular replacement or anomalous diffraction methods using selenomethionine. Herein, we produced the F37M/F77M mutant of U1A to augment the phasing capability of this powerful crystallization module. Selenomethionine-substituted U1A(F37M/F77M) retains high affinity for hpII (K _D of 59.7 ± 11.4 nM). The 2.20 Å resolution crystal structure reveals that the mutated sidechains make new S-π interactions in the hydrophobic core and are useful for single-wavelength anomalous diffraction. Crystals were also attained of U1A(F37M/F77M) in complex with a bacterial preQ₁-II riboswitch. The F34M/F37M/F77M mutant was introduced similarly into a lab-evolved U1A variant (TBP6.9) that recognizes the internal bulged loop of HIV-1 TAR RNA. We envision that this short RNA sequence can be placed into non-essential duplex regions to promote crystallization and phasing of target RNAs. We show that selenomethionine-substituted TBP6.9(F34M/F37M/F77M) binds a TAR variant wherein the apical loop was replaced with a GNRA tetraloop (K _D of 69.8 ± 2.9 nM), laying the groundwork for use of TBP6.9(F34M/F37M/F77M) as a crystallization module. These new tools are available to the research community.

Molecular Features and Metal Ions That Influence 10-23 DNAzyme Activity

Deoxyribozymes (DNAzymes) with RNA hydrolysis activity have a tremendous potential as gene suppression agents for therapeutic applications. The most extensively studied representative is the 10-23 DNAzyme consisting of a catalytic loop and two substrate binding arms that can be designed to bind and cleave the RNA sequence of interest. The RNA substrate is cleaved between central purine and pyrimidine nucleotides. The activity of this DNAzyme in vitro is considerably higher than in vivo, which was suggested to be related to its divalent cation dependency. Understanding the mechanism of DNAzyme catalysis is hindered by the absence of structural information. Numerous biological studies, however, provide comprehensive insights into the role of particular deoxynucleotides and functional groups in DNAzymes. Here we provide an overview of the thermodynamic properties, the impact of nucleobase modifications within the catalytic loop, and the role of different metal ions in catalysis. We point out features that will be helpful in developing novel strategies for structure determination and to understand the mechanism of the 10-23 DNAzyme. Consideration of these features will enable to develop improved strategies for structure determination and to understand the mechanism of the 10-23 DNAzyme. These insights provide the basis for improving activity in cells and pave the way for developing DNAzyme applications.