Leukocyte esterase in the diagnosis of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection

Serum and Synovial Markers in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip, Knee, and Shoulder: An Algorithmic Approach

➤ No single test has demonstrated absolute accuracy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).➤ Physicians rely on a combination of serological tests, synovial markers, and clinical findings plus clinical judgment to help to guide preoperative decision-making.➤ Several organizations have proposed criteria for the diagnosis of hip or knee PJI on which we now rely.➤ Given that shoulder arthroplasty has only recently become popular, it is possible that a shoulder-specific definition of PJI will be introduced in the coming years.➤ Although a number of serum and synovial markers have demonstrated high accuracy for the diagnosis of PJI of the hip and knee, further research is needed in order to identify markers that may be more suitable for the diagnosis of shoulder PJI and for the potential development and identification of specific serological tests as screening tools for PJI.

Diagnosing a periprosthetic shoulder infection: A systematic review

Introduction

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding accurate shoulder prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis.

Methods

Using PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed 25 studies reporting on 5535 patients and 646 infections.

Results

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) cultures were positive in 60% of patients. Serum markers WBC, CRP, ESR, and IL-6 appear to lack diagnostic reliability. Synovial IL-6 and alpha-defensin may be more accurate in detecting infections.

Conclusion

Synovial IL-6 and alpha-defensin appear to have greater utility than serum markers. These may be incorporated into new criteria to accurately diagnose shoulder PJI.

Level of evidence

IV.

Serum and Synovial Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Implant-Associated Infection After Orthopedic Surgery

Implant-associated infection is one of the most devastating complications following orthopedic surgery. Early identification is crucial for treatment. Currently, however, a reliable diagnostic tool is lacking, partly due to disparate bacteria colonies (virulent vs non-virulent), difficulty in distinguishing infection from inflammatory disease, and highly diverse diagnostic thresholds and testing methods. Given the importance of biomarkers in the initial screening for the infection, an extensive effort has been made to develop serum and synovial biomarkers. In this review, the authors summarize the results from the most relevant studies to provide comprehensive information on biomarkers for the diagnosis of implant-associated infection. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e158-e166.].

Pre- and peroperative diagnosis of Cutibacterium acnes infections in shoulder surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cutibacterium acnes is the most commonly detected pathogen during shoulder surgery. Lack of typical infection signs make Cutibacterium acnes infections difficult to diagnose. This systematic review aims to determine which pre- and peroperative diagnostic tools are most reliable to identify Cutibacterium acnes infections after shoulder surgery.

METHODS

PubMed/Embase were searched for diagnostic studies. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. Forest plots summarized results (sensitivity and specificity) for each pre- and peroperative diagnostic tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included, of which 8 described preoperative, 10 peroperative, and 4 both pre- and peroperative diagnostic tools. Quality of the studies varied widely. For preoperative tools, synovial calprotectin, interleukin-6, and combined interleukin-6/interleukin-2/tumor necrosis factor-α had the best efficacy measures. Pre-revision biopsies and arthroscopic tissue cultures were the best peroperative tools.

CONCLUSION

Despite a lack of evidence and the use of different Cutibacterium acnes infection criteria and reference standards, the use of combined interleukin-6/interleukin-2/tumor necrosis factor-α as preoperative and arthroscopic tissue cultures as peroperative diagnostic tool is for now recommended based on results and validity. More research should be performed to provide valid evidence on these tools. In order to do so, an internationally accepted definition of Cutibacterium acnes infections is essential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review.

The management of infected shoulder arthroplasty by two-stage revision

BACKGROUND

There remains no gold standard management for deep shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This case series aims to present our experience of two-stage revision arthroplasty, including eradication of infection and reoperation rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing revision arthroplasty for shoulder PJI between 2006 and 2015. Cases were confirmed using Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines. TSA removal, debridement and irrigation preceded antibiotic-loaded cement spacer insertion and a minimum of six weeks intravenous antibiotics. Reimplantation was performed as a second stage following a negative aspirate.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients underwent a first stage procedure (mean age 69 years; 16 male, 12 female). Propionibacterium acnes, Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the commonest microorganisms cultured. Five cases had mixed growths and six cases provided no growth. Three patients did not proceed to a second stage. Twenty-five patients underwent reimplantation (mean interval 6.7 months), with 80% remaining infection-free (mean follow-up 38.3 months).

DISCUSSION

Managing complex and late presentation shoulder PJI with two-stage revision is associated with high rates of infection eradication (80%). In the absence of a management consensus, our experience supports two-stage revision arthroplasty for eradicating infection in this complex patient group.

Preoperative Skin Cultures Predict Periprosthetic Infections in Revised Shoulder Arthroplasties: A Preliminary Report

Current approaches do not provide a practical method for the accurate prediction of a Cutibacterium periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in failed arthroplasties. Thus, surgeons revising failed arthroplasties must decide whether to exchange the implants and to institute antibiotic treatment without knowing the results of cultures of deep specimens obtained at the revision procedure. This study tests the hypothesis that the results of preoperative culture specimens of the skin surface obtained in the clinic can predict the presence of culture-positive Cutibacterium PJIs.

METHODS

Revision shoulder arthroplasties performed between October 3, 2017, and February 4, 2020, that had both preoperative clinic culture specimens and surgical culture specimens were included in this analysis. Culture results were assigned a value from 0 to 4. The percentage of the total skin bacterial load contributed by Cutibacterium (Cutibacterium percentage) was determined. To reduce concern about contamination, a robust criterion for culture-positive Cutibacterium PJI was applied: ≥2 surgical specimens with a Cutibacterium value of ≥1. The predictive values for a culture-positive Cutibacterium PJI were determined for a clinic skin culture Cutibacterium value of >1 and a clinic skin percentage of Cutibacterium of ≥75%.

RESULTS

Eighteen cases met the inclusion criteria; of these, 7 (6 male patients) met our criterion for a culture-positive Cutibacterium PJI. For all patients, a preoperative clinic skin Cutibacterium value of >1 predicted the presence of a culture-positive Cutibacterium PJI with an accuracy of 89%, and a clinic skin Cutibacterium percentage of ≥75% predicted the presence of a culture-positive Cutibacterium PJI with an accuracy of 94%. For male patients, a preoperative clinic skin Cutibacterium value of >1 predicted the presence of a culture-positive Cutibacterium PJI with an accuracy of 91%, and a clinic skin Cutibacterium percentage of ≥75% predicted the presence of a culture-positive Cutibacterium PJI with an accuracy of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple culture specimen of the unprepared skin surface obtained in a clinic prior to revision shoulder arthroplasty may provide valuable assistance to surgeons planning a revision arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Meta-analysis of serum and/or plasma D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value of D-dimer in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

A systematic search and screening of relevant studies was performed in the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) or keywords: "arthroplasty or joint prosthesis or joint replacement or periprosthetic joint or prosthetic joint", "infection or infectious or infected", and "D-dimer or serum D-dimer or plasma D-dimer or fibrin degradation products". Data were subsequently analysed and processed using Meta-Disc.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 1285 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.79), 0.69 (95% CI 0.66-0.72), 3.01 (95% CI 1.84-4.93), 0.32 (95% CI 0.19-0.53), and 10.20 (95% CI 3.63-28.64), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the use of serum D-dimer had better sensitivity and specificity than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum D-dimer was shown to have a better diagnostic value than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI. Further research is required for clarification.

Sonication in shoulder surgery: is it necessary?

PURPOSE

The objective of the present study was to determine whether sonication yields greater sensitivity when compared with the traditional tissue culture in detecting peri-implant infections in shoulder surgery.

METHODS

It is a retrospective study that includes 99 shoulder surgeries with implants explanted. The inclusion criteria required at least four tissue cultures, sonication of the material explanted, and a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients were classified according to the definition of periprosthetic shoulder infection of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections. The classifications are definitive infection, probable infection, possible infection, and unlikely infection.

RESULTS

Among the 99 surgical procedures, 31 were considered definitive infections, 11 possible/probable infections, and 57 unlikely infections. Considering the cases with a definitive infection, the sensitivity of the tissue culture was 87.09% and the sensitivity of sonication stood at 80.64% (p = 0.406). Analyzing the cases with a definitive infection and those having a possible/probable infection together and comparing them with those with unlikely infection, the sensitivity of sonication was 80.4% and the sensitivity of the tissue culture came to 91.4%. The specificity of the sonication was 98.1% and the specificity of the tissue culture was 99.6%.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of sonication in shoulder surgery (80.64%) is not superior to the sensitivity of the tissue culture (87.09%). Specificity remains high with both methods, being 98.1% in the sonication group and 99.6% in the tissue culture. Sonication brings no benefit to the detection of shoulder per-implant infections.

[Two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of proximal humeral fracture]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the effectiveness of two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture.

METHODS

Between June 2014 and January 2018, 17 patients with deep infection and humeral head necrosis or bone nonunion after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures were treated. There were 8 males and 9 females, aged from 52 to 78 years (mean, 63.8 years). The infection occurred at 19-66 months after the initial internal fixation (mean, 34.8 months). Microbial culture of joint fluid was positive in 14 cases and negative in 3 cases. The preoperative Constant score, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were 36.41±8.65, 31.06±7.43, and 7.29±0.99, respectively. The preoperative ranges of forward flexion, abduction, external rotation were (45.88±12.46), (42.18±12.31), and (16.76±4.92)°, respectively. The preoperative range of internal rotation was buttock in 9 cases, lumbosacral joint in 3 cases, L 3 in 5 cases. At the first-stage surgery, the thorough debridement was done and the antibiotic-impregnated bone cement spacer was placed after the removal of internal fixation. After the infections disappeared, the two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed. The mean interval between the two procedures was 4.2 months (range, 3.0-6.5 months).

RESULTS

All the incisions healed primarily and no complications such as recurrent infection or vascular nerve injury occurred. All patients were followed up 15-32 months (mean, 22.0 months). At last follow-up, the ranges of forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were (109.00±23.66), (98.53±16.92), (41.41±6.82)°, respectively; and the range of internal rotation was lumbosacral joint in 5 cases, L 3 in 8 cases, T 12 in 4 cases. The range of motion of shoulder joints at last follow-up was significant improved when compared with the preoperative range of motion ( P<0.05). The Constant score (64.88±8.70), ASES score (65.18±8.10), and VAS score (2.94±1.25) were significantly superior to the preoperative scores ( P<0.05). X-ray films showed that no prosthesis loosening occurred.

CONCLUSION

Two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for the postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture, which has advantages of low risk of infection recurrence, good shoulder function, and satisfactory short-term effectiveness.

What Is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Alpha-Defensin and Leukocyte Esterase Test in Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection?

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is challenging, especially in patients with Cutibacterium (formerly Propionibacterium) acnes infection. Despite the increasing number of patients with PJI of the shoulder, there are still no robust data regarding diagnostic tests in detecting shoulder PJI.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What are the sensitivity, specificity, and negative- and positive-predictive values for the alpha-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test in detecting PJI after TSA? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies in detecting shoulder PJI for synovial alpha-defensin, leukocyte esterase Test, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP)?

METHODS

All patients with painful TSA, who underwent joint aspiration to validate or exclude a PJI, between July 2015 and February 2018 were enrolled in this single-center study. Further indications for aspiration were as follows: planned revision arthroplasty, early loosening and clinical signs of infections, especially serum CRP elevation. A total of 121 patients were aspirated to exclude or verify a PJI, and 16 patients were excluded. In all, 105 patients with a mean age of 68 years (± 12 years) were included for analysis. Patients who underwent TSA were considered aseptic or septic according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Twenty-four patients had a PJI, and the remaining 81 patients were in the aseptic group. The microbiologic evaluation including polymicrobial infection showed C. (formerly P.) acnes in 15 patients (63%). Synovial fluid was then analyzed using microbiology cultures, alpha-defensin immunoassay, and leukocyte esterase. The specificity, sensitivity, and positive-predictive and negative-predictive values were calculated for each test.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy for alpha-defensin was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.4-96); sensitivity was 75% (95% CI, 53-90), specificity was 96% (95% CI, 90-99), negative predictive value was 93% (95% CI, 85-97), and positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI, 64-97). In contrast, the overall accuracy for leukocyte esterase was 76% (95% CI, 61-88), sensitivity was 50% (95% CI, 21-79), specificity was 87% (95% CI, 69-96), positive predictive value 60% (95% CI, 26-88) and negative predictive value was 81% (95% CI, 64-93).

CONCLUSIONS

Summarizing the study results, the alpha-defensin ELISA and leukocyte esterase tests had less sensitivity in detecting shoulder PJI than previously reported TKA or THA results. The quality and low amount of joint fluid is the difficult part of the diagnostic. C. (formerly P.) acnes was the most common cause of PJI. Focusing on low-grade infections, alpha-defensin has shown its advantages in diagnosing PJI regardless pathogen virulence. Since the diagnostic of a PJI is always a synopsis of findings, the alpha-defensin and leukocyte esterase test can be used as adjunct diagnostic tool in patients with painful TSA. We propose further prospective studies to improve the diagnostic and confirm the results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Proceedings from the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections: evaluation of periprosthetic shoulder infection

The Second International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in July 2018. More than 800 experts from all 9 subspecialties of orthopedic surgery and allied fields of infectious disease, microbiology, and epidemiology were assembled to form the International Consensus Group. The shoulder workgroup reached consensus on 27 questions related to culture techniques, inflammatory markers, and diagnostic criteria used to evaluate patients for periprosthetic shoulder infection. This document contains the group's recommendations and rationale for each question related to evaluating periprosthetic shoulder infection.

Scoping review: Diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this scoping review is to assess the current evidence regarding periprosthetic shoulder infection to inform development of evidence and consensus-based guidelines.

METHODS

A search of Medline, Embase and PubMed was performed; two authors screened the results independently for inclusion.

RESULTS

Totally 88 studies were included. Incidence of periprosthetic shoulder infection ranged from 0.7% to 7%. The most common organisms to cause periprosthetic shoulder infection were Propionibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Male gender and younger age are the most reported risk factors. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein and serum/synovial biomarkers had limited diagnostic accuracy. Thirty-nine studies reported the outcome of surgical management of periprosthetic shoulder infection. Eradication rates vary from 54% to 100% for debridement procedures; 66-100% for permanent spacers; 50-100% following single-stage revision; 60-100% following two-stage revision; and 66-100% following resection arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

There is wide heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes of studies are often contradictory and due to issues with methodology and small sample sizes the optimal pathways for diagnosis and management cannot be determined from this review. Future research should be based on larger cohorts and randomised trials where feasible to provide more valid research for guiding future treatment of periprosthetic shoulder infection.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum, Synovial, and Tissue Testing for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that can occur following total joint replacement. Patients with chronic PJI report a substantially lower quality of life and face a higher risk of short-term mortality. Establishing a diagnosis of chronic PJI is challenging because of conflicting guidelines, numerous tests, and limited evidence. Delays in diagnosing PJI are associated with poorer outcomes and morbid revision surgery. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of serum, synovial, and tissue-based tests for chronic PJI.

METHODS

This review adheres to the Cochrane Collaboration's diagnostic test accuracy methods for evidence searching and syntheses. A detailed search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the grey literature was performed to identify studies involving the diagnosis of chronic PJI in patients with hip or knee replacement. Eligible studies were assessed for quality and bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed on tests with sufficient data points. Summary estimates and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were obtained using a bivariate model.

RESULTS

A total of 12,616 citations were identified, and 203 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these 203 studies, 170 had a high risk of bias. Eighty-three unique PJI diagnostic tests were identified, and 17 underwent meta-analyses. Laboratory-based synovial alpha-defensin tests and leukocyte esterase reagent (LER) strips (2+) had the best performance, followed by white blood-cell (WBC) count, measurement of synovial C-reactive protein (CRP) level, measurement of the polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%), and the alpha-defensin lateral flow test kit (Youden index ranging from 0.78 to 0.94). Tissue-based tests and 3 serum tests (measurement of interleukin-6 [IL-6] level, CRP level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) had a Youden index between 0.61 to 0.75 but exhibited poorer performance compared with the synovial tests mentioned above.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the literature pertaining to chronic PJI diagnostic tests is heterogeneous, and the studies are at a high risk for bias. We believe that greater transparency and more complete reporting in studies of diagnostic test results should be mandated by peer-reviewed journals. The available literature suggests that several synovial fluid-based tests perform well for diagnosing chronic PJI and their use is recommended in the work-up of any suspected case of chronic PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparative study of cultures and next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of shoulder prosthetic joint infections

BACKGROUND

Serum and synovial markers used to diagnose lower extremity prosthetic joint infection (PJI) have performed poorly for shoulder PJI. As a result, diagnosis is commonly reliant on the accuracy of positive or negative cultures. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can sequence an entire bacterial genome. This study was conducted to determine the correlation between NGS and routine cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

All patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled. In a standardized manner, tissue samples were transferred immediately into sterile specimen containers and transported for culture and NGS (MicroGen Dx, Lubbock, TX, USA). Infection definitions using culture and NGS were analyzed for concordance.

RESULTS

There were 44 total revision arthroplasty cases included. There were no cases of polymicrobial culture results. Cutibacterium (formerly Propionibacterium) acnes was the most common bacterial species cultured (8 of 13 [61.5%]) and identified by NGS (12 of 17 [70.1%]) in cases of definite and probable infection. The concordance (κ) between the 2 diagnostic criteria for defining infection that included culture or NGS was 0.333 (fair). There were significantly more cases of probable contaminants when cultures (10 of 44 [22.7%]) were used in the definition of infection compared with NGS (0 of 44 [0%]; P = .001).

DISCUSSION

Culture data from revision shoulder arthroplasty cases commonly yields monomicrobial results; whereas, NGS data suggests that bacterial loads in revision arthroplasty are most commonly polymicrobial. In addition, a definition of infection that uses cultures is more prone to "probable contaminants" than NGS. Significant uncertainty remains about our current methods of diagnosing shoulder PJI.

A meta-analysis of synovial biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infection: Synovasure™ is less effective than the ELISA-based alpha-defensin test

PURPOSE

(1) To determine the overall accuracy of synovial alpha-defensin, synovial C-reactive protein (sCRP), interleukin-6 (sIL-6), and leukocyte esterase (sLE) as diagnostic markers for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and (2) to independantly evaluate the accuracy of both the laboratory-based ELISA alpha-defensin test and the Synovasure™ alpha-defensin test kit.

METHODS

An EMBASE and MEDLINE (PubMed) database search was performed using a set of professionally set search terms. Two independent reviewers rated eligible articles. Sensitivity and specificity were meta-analysed using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

Accuracy values were extracted from 42 articles. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of the represented biomarkers were: alpha-defensin ELISA 0.97 (95% CI 0.91-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.98), respectively; Synovasure™ test kit assay 0.80 (95% CI 0.65-0.89) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.76-0.96), respectively; sLE 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.87) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.92), respectively; sIL-6 0.76 (95% CI 0.65-0.84) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94), respectively; sCRP 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.91) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.93), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The labararory-based alpha-defensin ELISA test showed the highest ever reported accuracy for PJI diagnosis. However, this did not apply for the Synovasure™ alpha-defensin test, which was comparable in its overall diagnostic accuracy to sCRP, sIL-6 and sLE. The later biomarkers also did not yield an overall diagnostic accuracy higher than that previously reported for synovial white cell count (sWBC) or culture bacteriology. Based on current evidence, no synovial biomarker should be applied as a standalone diagnostic tool. Furthermore, the use of the laboratory-based alpha-defensin ELISA test should be encouraged, still, the Synovasure™ alpha-defensin test kit should be critically appreciated.

LEVER OF EVIDENCE

III.

Preoperative skin cultures are predictive of Propionibacterium load in deep cultures obtained at revision shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Propionibacterium-specific cultures are commonly positive in revised shoulders without obvious signs of infection. To help identify patients at risk for these "stealth" presentations of positive Propionibacterium cultures, we assessed the value of a preoperative skin culture in predicting the results of deep cultures obtained at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty in patients without clinical evidence of infection.

METHODS

The study enrolled 60 patients undergoing revision for a prior shoulder arthroplasty without clinical evidence of infection. A preoperative culture of the skin surface was taken before skin preparation. At surgery, multiple (mean 5.9 ± standard deviation 1.6) deep tissue and explant cultures were harvested from the shoulder. Each culture was semiquantitatively reported as the specimen Propionibacterium value (SpPV). All SpPVs from the deep specimens from each patient were summed as the total shoulder Propionibacterium score (ShPS). The averaged ShPS was the total ShPS divided by the number of deep specimens harvested.

RESULTS

A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the preoperative skin SpPV was predictive of the Propionibacterium load in the revised shoulders as indicated by the total ShPS (P = .004) and averaged ShPS (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of patients, a preoperative culture of the unprepared skin was strongly predictive of the Propionibacterium load in revised shoulder arthroplasties without clinical evidence of infection. This result suggests that the results of skin cultures taken before revision surgery may help inform operative management with respect to the need for prosthesis exchange and extended postoperative antibiotic treatment.

Do Elevated Inflammatory Markers Associate With Infection in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Background

Serologic erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements, which have been successfully utilized in the lower extremity, are thought to lack adequate sensitivity in the diagnosis of infection after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic performance of preoperative white blood cell (WBC) count, ESR, and CRP in the diagnosis of infection in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty with the gold standard of infection being defined as a later diagnosis of infection.

Patients and methods

A national insurance database between the years of 2007 and 2015 (PearlDiver, Warsaw, IN) was queried for those patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty using a combination of procedural (common procedural terminology codes 23472 and 23474) and diagnostic codes (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9 code 81.97 and equivalent ICD-10 codes). This database contains demographics, laboratory data, and complication data to allow identification of patients with an infection within 1 year postoperatively.

Results

The database contained 1392 patients who met criteria. Among these, the best diagnostic performance was with a combined test which was positive if CRP, ESR, or WBC was positive with a sensitivity of 7% to 42%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 8% to 45%, a negative predictive value of 91%, and an accuracy of 84% to 85%. On multivariate analyses, predictors included an abnormal ESR (odds ratio 2.4, P = .05) and male gender (3.8, <.001).

Conclusions

Those patients with an abnormal preoperative ESR have significantly increased odds of a subsequent infection following revision shoulder arthroplasty. ESR, CRP, and WBC in combination are specific but insensitive. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic, Level III

Synovial Fluid Leukocyte Esterase in the Diagnosis of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious and frequent complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Recently, synovial fluid leukocyte esterase (LE), measurement of which is convenient and fast, has been examined as a marker of PJI. We summarized the articles describing synovial fluid LE as a biomarker for the diagnosis of PJI and assessed its diagnostic value in patients suspected of having PJI.

METHODS

We searched with appropriate key words in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane database, and Science Direct. Eligible studies providing sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables were chosen on the basis of several criteria, and the quality of the chosen studies was assessed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated for those studies. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and the area under the SROC (AUSROC) were used to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance of LE.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were found suitable for this systematic review. Among them, eight articles with a total of 1,011 participants qualified for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.96), 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), and 310.76 (95% CI 103.86-929.88), respectively. The SROC was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99). Sub-group analysis indicated that the sample inclusion criteria might be the main source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was suggested by an asymmetrical funnel plot (p = 0.144).

CONCLUSION

Although the result of synovial fluid LE assay can be influenced by sample-related factors, it is more specific as a means to exclude PJI.

The Leukocyte Esterase Strip Test has Practical Value for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Leukocyte esterase (LE) was recently reported to be an accurate marker for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) as defined by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. However, the diagnostic value of the LE test for PJI after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the reliability of the subjective visual interpretation of the LE test, and the correlation between the LE test results and the current MSIS criteria remain unclear.

METHODS

This study prospectively enrolled 60 patients undergoing revision TKA for either PJI or aseptic failure. Serological marker, synovial fluid, and histological analyses were performed in all cases. The PJI group comprised 38 cases that met the MSIS criteria and the other 22 cases formed the aseptic group. All the LE tests were interpreted using both visual judgment and automated colorimetric reader.

RESULTS

When "++" results were considered to indicate a positive PJI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 84, 100, 100, 79, and 90%, respectively. The visual interpretation agreed with the automated colorimetric reader in 90% of cases (Cronbach α = 0.894). The grade of the LE test was strongly correlated with the synovial white blood cell count (ρ = 0.695) and polymorphonuclear leukocyte percentage (ρ = 0.638) and moderately correlated with the serum C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

CONCLUSION

The LE test has high diagnostic value for diagnosing PJI after TKA. Subjective visual interpretation of the LE test was reliable and valid for the current battery of PJI diagnostic tests according to the MSIS criteria.

Effect of Depth of Centrifuged Synovial Fluid on Leukocyte Esterase Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Centrifugation of aspirated synovial fluid before leukocytes esterase (LE) testing for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) may make blood tinged specimens interpretable. We aimed to establish the proper sampling depth of centrifuged specimens for LE testing as one diagnostic criterion and also AS-D chloroacetate esterase (CAE) staining testing as an adjunctive tool. A definite PJI knee joint group and an aseptic primary total knee arthroplasty control group were studied quasi-experimentally (N = 46). At 2,000 g for 15 min, 3 ml of synovial fluid was centrifuged. LE strip testing and median synovial WBC count were performed at 2, 4, and 6 mm depths. CAE staining test characterized LE particles. ROC curve, area under the curve, and significant differences were determined. The proper predictive depth to diagnose PJI was sought by forward stepwise logistic regression. All fresh blood-tinged specimens had uncertain interpretations. Centrifugation increased interpretability (55-100%). ROC curve and area under the curve at 2, 4, and 6 mm depths were 0.822, 0.804, and 0.786, respectively. The cut point of ++ to diagnose PJI was statistically significant (p < 0.05) at all depths. p-values of forward stepwise logistic regression at 2, 4, and 6 mm were 0.001, 0.752, and 0.756, respectively. CAE staining confirmed extracellular LE release by polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN). A specimen at <2 mm from the surface of centrifuged synovial fluid at a grading of ++ or more for PJI diagnosis is proper for LE testing. CAE staining testing adjunctively characterizes LE particles and cell morphology. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2545-2550, 2017.

Leukocyte Esterase as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Background

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been one of the most rewarding interventions for treating patients suffering from joint disorders. However, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication that frequently accompanies TJA. Our study aimed to investigate the application of the leukocyte esterase (LE) strip in the diagnosis of PJI.

Material/Methods

From October 2014 to July 2015, 72 patients who had undergone joint puncture after arthroplasty in our hospital were enrolled in this trial. One drop of synovial fluid from each available patient was applied to the LE strip, and the results were observed after 1–3 min. If the color turned to dark purple, we recognized this as a positive result, while other colors were regarded as negative results. Centrifugation was used when the synovial fluid was mixed with blood. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) definition was used as the standard reference to identify whether PJI was found in patients or not. The results of diagnosis and LE strips test were compared, and indicators reflecting diagnostic value were calculated. Correlation of the LE data with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), synovial white blood cell (WBC) counts, and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) percentage was calculated.

Results

By MSIS criteria, 38 patients were diagnosed with PJI and 34 patients were not infected. Two types of LE strip presented the same results with sensitivity of 84.21% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.75~93.98%), specificity of 97.06% (95% CI: 84.67~99.93%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.97% (95% CI: 84.24~99.92%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.62% (95% CI: 69.47~94.14%). There were one false-positive case and six false-negative cases in this trial. There is a strong correlation between LE strip and synovial fluid PMN percentage.

Conclusions

The sensitivity and specificity of the LE strip in the diagnosis of PJI are quite high, which means the LE strip might be used as an alternative to diagnose PJI in clinical practice.

The challenge of Propionibacterium acnes and revision shoulder arthroplasty: a review of current diagnostic options

BACKGROUND

Propionibacterium acnes is the most common cause of infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Whereas there are several methods that can aid in the diagnosis of P. acnes infection, there is not a single "gold standard" because of the difficulties inherent in identifying this bacterium. We present an evidence-based discussion of the demographic, clinical, and radiographic predictors of P. acnes infection and review the current options for diagnosis.

METHODS

This review was written after a comprehensive analysis of the current literature related to shoulder periprosthetic joint infection and P. acnes identification.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Of the techniques reviewed, α-defensin had the highest sensitivity in detecting P. acnes infection (63%). C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were often normal in cases of infection. Whereas P. acnes can be challenging to successfully diagnose, there are several options that are considered preferable because of their higher sensitivities and specificities. The current gold standard is intraoperative culture, but major advances in molecular techniques may provide future improvements in diagnostic accuracy.