Preventing brachial plexus injury during shoulder surgery: a real-time cadaveric study

Upper limb peripheral nerve injuries in patients with ARDS requiring prone positioning: A systematic review with proportion meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) undergoing prone positioning.

METHODS

This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. Four electronic databases including PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), The Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to January 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted to examine the combined prevalence of upper limb PNI among patients requiring prone positioning.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies (511 patients) were pooled in the quantitative analysis. All studies had a low or moderate risk of bias in methodological quality. The overall proportion of patients with upper limb PNI was 13% (95%CI: 5% to 29%), with large between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 84.6%, P<0.001). Both ulnar neuropathy and brachial plexopathy were described in 4 studies.

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, prone positioning has been used extensively. Different approaches among ICU teams and selective reporting by untrained staff may be a factor in interpreting the large variability between studies and the 13% proportion of patients with upper limb PNI found in the present meta-analysis. Therefore, it is paramount to stress the importance of patient assessment both after discharge from the ICU and during subsequent follow-up evaluations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Specialized training is essential to ensure safe prone positioning, with careful consideration given to arms and head placement to mitigate potential nerve injuries. Therefore, healthcare protocols should incorporate preventive strategies, with patient assessments conducted by expert multidisciplinary teams.

Growth of the brachial nerve plexus with reference to topographical relation of the medianus nerve ansa with the thoracic wall and shoulder: a histologic study using human embryos and fetuses

BACKGROUND

There is currently no information on positional changes in the brachial nerve plexus during prenatal growth. The subclavian-axillary artery passing through the medianus nerve ansa is considered a good landmark for evaluating the height of the plexus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used histologic sections from 9 embryos and 17 fetuses (approximately 6-15 weeks of gestational age) to identify the height of the ansa by referring to the level of the rib and the glenohumeral joint.

RESULTS

The nerve ansa was usually (23 plexuses) observed at the level of the first and/or second ribs. However, it was sometimes observed above the first rib, at a distance equal to or more than an intercostal width (7 plexuses). In the latter group, the ansa was usually located below the glenohumeral joint. Thus, the joint was located higher than the first rib, although the upper extremities were in the anatomic position for all specimens. The left-right difference in the height of the plexus corresponded to or was less than the width of the first intercostal space. Despite the synchronized growth between the thorax and shoulder girdle, the brachial plexus showed a considerable variation in comparative height; the range corresponded to twice of an intercostal width. Whether the nerve plexus is located high or low is determined at an early developmental stage and is maintained during the later growth stages.

CONCLUSION

The high-positioned plexus might cause nerve injury at delivery, followed by a glenohumeral joint deformity because of the fragility without fixation in the thorax.

Evaluation of the Painful Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Despite the overall success of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (aTSA and rTSA), some patients continue to have or develop pain postoperatively. As the number of shoulder arthroplasties continues to increase in the United States, it is important that surgeons are able to recognize, diagnose, and treat the various pathologies. Some painful etiologies are specific to either aTSA or rTSA, and others can occur with both implant types. Infections, stiffness, neurologic syndromes, polyethylene wear, aseptic implant loosening, and metal allergies occur, regardless of implant choice. However, after an aTSA, subscapularis repair failure, superior rotator cuff tear, and joint overstuffing can result in shoulder pain. After a rTSA, specific causes of postoperative pain include instability, scapular notching, acromial or scapular spine fractures, subcoracoid pain, and neurologic injury. Regardless of the diagnosis, the surgeon must be methodical in the evaluation and, when appropriate, use blood work, advanced imaging studies, joint aspirations, shoulder arthroscopy, and nerve studies. Once diagnosed, appropriate treatment should be undertaken to resolve the cause of the pain or at least minimize the effect of the pain on the patient's outcome.

Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A current concepts review

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a common procedure performed for a variety of shoulder pathologies.

Aims and objectives

This current concept review evaluates the intraoperative and early postoperative complications, with a specific focus given to neurological and vascular injury, fracture, dislocation and venous thromboembolism.

Conclusion

A detailed knowledge of potential complications will allow surgeons to mitigate risk and maximise outcomes.

Elongation of the brachial plexus after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an anatomical study

INTRODUCTION

The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming more extended and its clinical results are good or excellent according to the literature. The main biomechanical characteristic of RSA is that it lowers and medializes the centre of rotation of the shoulder causing an arm lengthening. Although the number of neurological complications is low (5%), there are more neurophysiological changes in the brachial plexus with RSA than with the anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. The main goal of this study was to quantify the lengthening of the terminal branches of the brachial plexus suffered after RSA implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

20 Embalmed cadavers were analysed. Four distances using bone references were employed to measure the lengthening of the arm and subacromial space. The brachial plexus and its terminal branches (radial, axillary, ulnar, musculocutaneous and median nerves) and the axillary artery, were identified and marked. Measurements were made to determine the change of position of the neurovascular structures, the arm lengthening and the lengthening of each nerve before and after the implantation of RSA. Two models of RSA were used: SMR^®(Lima) and Delta Xtend^®(DePuy-Synthes).

RESULTS

The mean arm elongation was 10.5 mm. The subacromial space suffers an elongation of 20.5-29.8%. All the neurovascular structures suffered elongation: median nerve 23.1%, musculocutaneous nerve 22.1%, ulnar nerve 19%, radial nerve 17%, axillary nerve 12-14.5%, axillary artery 24.8%. There were no differences in the results between the types of prosthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its design, the RSA causes an arm lengthening which is reflected by the elongation of the neurovascular structures of the arm.

Risk Factors, Management, and Prognosis of Brachial Plexopathy Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Brachial plexus injuries can have a significant impact on patient outcomes following RTSA by slowing the overall recovery and return of function. Risk factors for brachial plexopathy include traction injury related to arm positioning and exposure during the procedure, direct nerve injury from surgical dissection, and compression injury from retractor placement. Risk of nerve injury can be minimized by limiting the time spent with the arm extended and externally rotated and avoiding excessive traction on the arm during humeral preparation and implant insertion. Prompt identification of postoperative brachial plexopathy is important to optimize the recovery of function.

Incidence, Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management of Peripheral Nerve Injuries Following Shoulder Arthroplasty

In this article, the authors review the incidence and causes of iatrogenic peripheral nerve injuries following shoulder arthroplasty and provide preventative measures to decrease nerve injury rate and management options. They describe common direct and indirect causes of injury such as laceration and retractor use versus arm positioning and lengthening, respectively. Preventative measures include an understanding of anatomy and high-risk locations in the shoulder, minimizing extreme ranges of arm motion and utilization of intraoperative nerve monitoring. Lastly, the authors review diagnosis and management of neurologic symptoms including how and when to use electrodiagnostic studies, nerve grafts, transfers, or muscle/tendon transfers.

Neurologic complications in primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A review

Neurologic injury during shoulder replacement is one of the less common complications of the procedure, however the clinical implications can be significant. The purpose of this paper is to review the current literature on neurologic complications in various types of shoulder replacement and provide recommendations regarding avoidance, evaluation, and management of these complications.

Reducing the Risk and Impact of Brachial Plexus Injury Sustained From Prone Positioning-A Clinical Commentary

INTRODUCTION

Prone positioning is deployed as a critical treatment for improving oxygenation in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. This regimen is currently highly prevalent in the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has brought about increased concern about how best to safely avoid brachial plexus injuries when caring for unconscious proned patients.

METHODS

A review of the published literature on brachial plexus injuries secondary to proning ventilated patients was performed. This was combined with a review of available international critical care guidelines in order to produce a succinct set of guidelines to aid critical care departments in reducing brachial plexus injuries during these challenging times.

DISCUSSION

There is no one manner in which prone positioning an unconscious patient can be made universally safe. This paper provides 6 key steps to reducing the incidence of brachial plexus injuries while proning and suggests a safe and sensible management and referral pathway for the conscious patient in which a brachial plexus injury is identified.

CONCLUSION

There is in truth no completely safe position for every patient and certainly there will be anomalies in anatomy that will predispose certain individuals to nerve injury. Thus the injury rate cannot be reduced to zero but an understanding of the principles of protection will inform those undertaking positioning.

Anterior shoulder anatomy and subcoracoid impingement: An anatomical study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to describe the anatomy of the anterior shoulder, specifically structures potentially involved in subscapularis tears pathophysiology and also to identify structures at risk during surgical approaches of this area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed an observational, experimental study based on cadaveric models. Dissection was performed and several structures of the anterior shoulder were characterized including the subscapularis, coracoid morphology, the coracoacromial ligament, coraco-humeral distance, and the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves.

RESULTS

Our sample included 16 shoulders. The coracoacromial ligament presented two bands in 37.5%, and these variants were significantly wider and thinner, and were associated with inferior coraco-humeral distance in internal rotation. The subscapularis footprint was longer and the coracoid process was bigger in male specimens, and the median coracoid angle was 122°, corresponding to a Leite-Torres type I. The Subscapularis showed a median thickness of 0.7cm, while the coraco-humeral distance in our sample ranged from 0.30cm in internal rotation to 0.85cm in external rotation. Neurologic relevant structures were at least more than 2.55cm from the coracoid tip.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first paper to explore the eventual relationship between the presence of a double band coracoacromial ligament variant and subcoracoid impingement. Also, to our knowledge, this is the first cadaveric model study to postulate a possible anatomic base for subcoracoid impingement, as the SS myotendinous junction thickness was found to be greater than the coraco-humeral distance in neutral position and in IR.

Complete Bilateral Brachial Plexus Injury from Rhabdomyolysis and Compartment Syndrome: Surgical Case Report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Acute bilateral brachial plexus injury is rare and usually a result of traction injury. Immediate operative intervention is reserved for rare cases of ongoing compression of the plexus; the role for acute decompression of the brachial plexus secondary to compartment syndrome has not been previously described. In this report, we describe the technique and role for urgent brachial plexus decompression.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 32-yr-old man presented with acute complete bilateral brachial plexus palsy due to focal rhabdomyolysis and brachial plexus compression after a night of excess alcohol and methadone ingestion. He had complete loss of motor and sensory function from C5 to T1, with the exception of partial sensory sparing of the C5 dermatome. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated diffuse muscular edema of the supraclavicular and infraclavicular fossae in addition to the pectoralis muscles and the deltoids bilaterally. He underwent urgent surgical decompression of his supraclavicular and infraclavicular fossae with fasciotomies of the pectoral muscles and the anterior deltoids, allowing direct visualization and decompression of the entire brachial plexus resulting in a near-complete functional recovery.

CONCLUSION

Neurosurgeons should include brachial plexus compression due to compartment syndrome in the differential diagnosis of patients with acute upper extremity weakness, particularly when associated with prolonged immobilization and/or substance abuse. Prompt surgical decompression should be performed in these patients if imaging and laboratory data suggest compartment syndrome and resultant neurological deficit.