Attitudes and awareness of suture anchor cost: a survey of shoulder surgeons performing rotator cuff repairs

Comparison of cost, surgical time, and clinical results between arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair with lateral cortical augmentation and arthroscopic transosseous equivalent suture bridge: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

To reduce the healthcare burden, the clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and the cost of the implants used have recently been focused upon. This study compared implant cost, surgical time, short-term clinical results, and cuff repair integrity 2 years postoperatively between arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair using lateral cortical augmentation (TOA) and arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture bridge (TOE).

METHODS

This study included 220 patients with rotator cuff repairs performed by a single surgeon between December 2013 and December 2018. Overall, 70 TOA and 68 TOE cases met the inclusion criteria. The same surgeon performed the procedures at two different hospitals, and the techniques differed between the facilities. A total of 42 TOA patients were matched with 42 TOE patients. The patients were matched using a propensity score analysis by gender, age, and cuff tear size. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. Implant cost and surgical time were compared between the two methods. The range of motion, clinical outcomes, and visual analog scale were evaluated. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to examine cuff repair integrity 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The follow-up rate was 81% (112/138 patients). Implant cost was significantly lower with TOA ($1,396 vs. $2,165; p < 0.001) than with TOE. The average surgical time in the TOA method was significantly shorter than that in the TOE method (82 vs. 109 min; p = 0.001). At a minimum 2-year follow-up, the mean active elevation, abduction, and clinical outcomes improved with both methods, although no improvements in external and internal rotations were observed with either method. There were no significant differences in the postoperative variables and retear rate (TOA, 12%; TOE, 19%; p = 0.548) between the two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

TOA and TOE achieved comparable clinical results; however, TOA was more cost-effective and had a shorter surgical time than TOE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅲ, retrospective matched control study.

Orthopaedic surgery residents report little subjective or objective familiarity with healthcare costs

PURPOSE

Residents have limited education regarding the cost of orthopaedic interventions. Orthopaedic residents' knowledge was surveyed in three scenarios involving an intertrochanteric femur fracture: 1) uncomplicated course with 2-day hospital stay; 2) complicated course necessitating ICU admission; and 3) readmission for pulmonary embolism management.

METHODS

From 2018 to 2020, 69 orthopaedic surgery residents were surveyed. Respondents estimated hospital charges and collections; professional charges and collections; implant cost; and level of knowledge depending on the scenario.

RESULTS

Most residents (83.6%) reported feeling "not knowledgeable". Respondents reporting "somewhat knowledgeable" did not perform better than those who reported "not knowledgeable". In the uncomplicated scenario, residents underestimated hospital charges and collections (p < 0.01; p = 0.87), and overestimated hospital charges and collections and professional collections (all p < 0.01) with an average percent error of 57.2%. Most residents (88.4%) were aware the sliding hip screw construct costs less than a cephalomedullary nail. In the complex scenario, while residents underestimated the hospital charges (p < 0.01), the estimated collections were closer to the actual figure (p = 0.16). In the third scenario, residents overestimated the charges and collections (p = 0.04; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopaedic surgery residents receive little education regarding healthcare economics and feel unknowledgeable therefore a role for formal economic education during orthopaedic residency may exist.

Arthroscopic transosseous anchorless rotator cuff repair reduces bone defects related to peri-implant cyst formation: a comparison with conventional suture anchors using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

The transosseous anchorless repair (ToR) technique was recently introduced to avoid suture anchor-related problems. While favorable outcomes of the ToR technique have been reported, no previous studies on peri-implant cyst formation with the ToR technique exist. Therefore, this study compared the clinical outcomes and prevalence of peri-implant cyst formation between the ToR technique and the conventional transosseous equivalent technique using suture anchors (SA).

METHODS

Cases with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) between 2016 and 2018 treated with the double-row suture bridge technique were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into ToR and SA groups. To compare clinical outcomes, 19 ToR and 57 SA cases without intraoperative implant failure were selected using propensity score matching (PSM). While intraoperative implant failure rate was analyzed before PSM, retear rate, peri-implant cyst formation rate, and functional outcomes were compared after PSM.

RESULTS

The intraoperative implant failure rate (ToR, 8% vs. SA, 15.3%) and retear rate (ToR, 5.3% vs. SA, 19.3%) did not differ between the two groups (all P>0.05). However, peri-implant cysts were not observed in the ToR group, while they were observed in 16.7% of the SA group (P=0.008). Postoperative functional outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The ToR technique produced comparable clinical outcomes to conventional techniques. Considering the prospect of potential additional surgeries, the absence of peri-implant cyst formation might be an advantage of ToR. Furthermore, ToR might reduce the medical costs related to suture anchors and, thereby, could be a useful option for ARCR. Level of evidence: III.

'But what if you miss something …?': factors that influence medical student consideration of cost in decision making

CONTEXT

Cost-conscious care is critical for healthcare sustainability but evidence suggests that most doctors do not consider cost in their clinical decision making. A critical step in changing this is understanding the barriers to encouraging behaviours and attitudes related to cost-conscious care. We therefore conducted a qualitative study to address the research question: what factors influence consideration of cost in emergency medicine (ED) clinical decision making?

METHODS

This was a qualitative focus group study using patient vignettes to explore attitudes towards cost-conscious clinical decision making. Participants were Year 4 and Year 5 medical students from Singapore, a country with a fee-for-service healthcare system. After a data-driven initial data analysis, and to make sense of a multitude of factors impacting on cost conscious care, we selected Fishbein's integrative model of behavioural prediction to underpin secondary data analysis.

RESULTS

Via four focus groups with 21 participants, we identified five main themes relevant to the integrative model of behavioural prediction. These were: attitudes towards considering cost when managing a patient (e.g., "better safe than sorry"); normative beliefs (e.g., doing what others do, perceptions of patient wishes); efficacy beliefs (e.g., no authority to take decisions or challenge); skills and knowledge (e.g., little knowledge of costs), and environmental constraints (e.g., the nature of the healthcare system).

DISCUSSION

Medical students do not consider cost in their clinical decision making due to numerous factors, of which lack of knowledge of costs is but one. While some of the factors identified reflect those found in previous studies with residents and fully-trained staff, and in other contexts, theory driven analysis added value in that it facilitated a richer exploration of why students do not consider cost in clinical decision making. Our findings provide insight to inform how best to engage and empower educators and learners in teaching and learning about cost-conscious care.

Teaching of Cost-Effective Care in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Training: A Survey of Residency Programs in the US

Costs of healthcare in the US continue to rise at rates that are unsustainable. Prior studies, most of which come from non-surgical specialties, indicate that a variety of strategies to teach this material are utilized but without consensus on best practices. No studies exist regarding the teaching of cost-effective care in orthopaedic residency training programs. The goal of this study was to assess the landscape in this area from the perspective of program leadership.

Methods

A survey was developed that was sent to orthopaedic residency program leadership via email through their interaction with the COERG. Additional programs were included to enhance diversity of responding programs. The survey, based on those published from other areas of medicine, included questions about the experiences of the respondents in learning about cost-effective care, as well as how faculty and residents learned about this topic.

Results

Seventy one percent (30) of respondents noted that their faculty did not receive formal training in cost-effective care, and education in this area was likely to come from the department, especially review of practice data (12, 44%). Only 19% (8) of respondents agreed with the statement that "the majority of teaching faculty in our program consistently model cost-effective healthcare to residents". Few of the programs (10, 24%) had formal curricula for residents regarding cost-effective care, and the primary mode of education in cost-effective care was through informal discussions with faculty (17, 43%). Few residents (3, 13%) were able to easily find the costs of tests or procedures.

Discussion

There is not consistent education in cost-effective care for orthopaedic surgery program leadership, faculty, or trainees. The results of this survey demonstrate a need for discussion of best practices, including increasing access to cost data at a local level, and engaging with the AOA, CORD, and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons more broadly in the development of standard education modules for faculty and residents, to improve the current and future delivery of cost-effective musculoskeletal care.

SPSS Analysis of Pain Factors in Rotator Cuff Repair

In this study, the matched case-control study was used. Nineteen cases of severe pain in the early postoperative period among 55 patients were set as the observation group, and 57 cases of simultaneous rotator cuff repair without severe pain were matched in a 1 : 3 ratio as the control group. Patients’ general information, disease characteristics, anesthesia and analgesia scheme, and operation information were collected. Frequency statistics, Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, regulatory effect analysis, and Poisson regression analysis were performed on these data. Some findings are included in the analysis. (1) There was a markable difference of 0.01 between the preoperative 48 h maximum pain value and the postoperative 48 h maximum pain value in the observation group. (2) There was a markable difference of 0.01 between the size and shape of the wound tear and the maximum pain value at 48 h after operation in the observation group. (3) When the number of opioid use affected the maximum pain value at 48 h after operation, the regulatory variables (type, quantity, and number of days of postoperative analgesics) were at different levels, and the impact amplitude had markable differences. (4) Age has a markable negative impact on the postoperative hospital stay. (5) The operation duration has a markable positive relationship with the postoperative hospital stay. (6) The analgesic pump had a markable positive impact on the postoperative hospital stay. (7) The location of injury did not affect the postoperative hospital stay.

Outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Two major techniques are used to repair complete quadriceps tendon ruptures, transosseous tunnel (TT) and the suture anchor (SA). There are multiple studies comparing the biomechanical outcomes of repairs performed with TT or SA. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using SA and TT fixation techniques.

METHODS

Three major search engines were used with predetermined keyword searches to perform a systematic review of literature. These studies were independently scanned by two reviewers using PRISMA criterion. All included studies had to include at least one of the following outcome measures: range of motion (ROM), Lysholm score, complications, and/or re-ruptures.

RESULTS

Using three major search engines, 1039 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and screening for inclusion, 49 articles were reviewed. Two independent reviewers searched the studies to meet the inclusion criteria, and eight studies were selected. These eight studies included 156 knees in the TT group and 54 knees in the SA group. The TT group had a significantly better ROM after QT repair (132.5° versus 127.0°, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between the TT group (92.6) and SA group (91.0, p = 0.11). There were significantly more complications in SA groups (9.3% versus 1.3%, p = 0.013), but not a significant difference in re-rupture rate between those undergoing SA vs. TT repair (3.7% versus 0%, p = 0.065). The SA group had a significantly higher age at time of surgery (63.62 vs. 54.32) CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that, following quadriceps tendon rupture, there are no significant differences in functional outcome between TT and SA techniques. Those undergoing TT repair attained a statistically significantly greater final ROM but this difference may not be clinically relevant. There was a statistically significantly higher rate of post-operative complications using SA technique.