Functional and radiologic results of the crimson duvet procedure in rotator cuff treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Similar Healing Rates of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With and Without Bone Marrow Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) techniques such as microfracture, nanofracture, and the crimson duvet procedure expose the bone marrow of the proximal humerus to the rotator cuff tendon footprint. The effect of performing BMS on tendon healing is a subject of interest.

PURPOSE

To compare studies on arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with BMS versus without BMS for rotator cuff tears according to healing rates and clinical and radiological outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

The 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed in conducting a search. Studies that compared arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without BMS were included if they provided postoperative patient-reported outcomes and healing rates. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MDs), while continuous outcomes were expressed as odds ratio.

RESULTS

Included were 5 studies (N = 499 shoulders); 4 studies had level 1 evidence, and 1 study had level 2 evidence. The healing rate of rotator cuff repair was similar between the 2 groups (ie, with and without BMS) (odds ratio, 1.58 [95% CI, 0.63 to 4.00]; P = .33). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the postoperative Constant score (MD, 1.41 [95% CI, -0.58 to 3.39]; P = .16), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (MD, 0.77 [95% CI, -1.43 to 2.96]; P = .49), or range of motion for forward flexion (MD, 2.45 [95% CI, -0.66 to 5.57]; P = .12) and external rotation (MD, 0.81 [95% CI, -2.35 to 3.97]; P = .62) at the final follow-up between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The healing rate of rotator cuff repair was similar, regardless of whether BMS was performed or not. Additionally, there was no significant difference in postoperative patient-reported outcome scores, range of motion, and complications.

REGISTRATION

CRD42023388427 (PROSPERO).

Bone Marrow Stimulation Does Not Lead to Lower Retear Rates, Better Functional Outcomes, or Higher Complication Rates at Short-Term Follow-Up for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of bone marrow stimulation (BMS) on retear rates, functional outcomes, and complication rates in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched on March 25, 2023. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodologic quality of the enrolled studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software, version 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 7 randomized controlled trials with 638 patients were included. The evaluation of rotator cuff tendon integrity was conducted using distinct imaging modalities. Specifically, 259 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging whereas 208 patients underwent ultrasound. Additionally, a subset of 95 patients underwent either of these modalities; however, the precise distribution between these 2 modalities was not explicitly delineated. Compared with RCR alone, RCR combined with BMS provided similar retear rates (P = .51, I2 = 46%), Constant-Murley scores (P = .14, I2 = 0%), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (standardized shoulder assessment form) scores (P = .56, I2 = 0%), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index scores (P = .20, I2 = 0%), visual analog scale scores (P = .19, I2 = 0%), forward flexion (P = .18, I2 = 0%), external rotation (P = .62, I2 = 0%), severe complication rates (P = .56, I2 = 0%), and mild complication rates (P = .10, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the outcomes observed after isolated arthroscopic RCR, arthroscopic RCR with BMS showed comparable results in terms of retear rate, functional outcomes, and incidence of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.

Editorial Commentary: Bone Marrow Stimulation or Microfracture May Not Enhance the Success of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Bone Marrow Stimulation (BMS) is intended to provide a very low-cost, local source of marrow elements to improve healing and outcomes following rotator cuff repair. However, meta-analysis does not show that this results in improvement in rotator cuff tear outcomes or healing (as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound). That said, some studies do show lower retear rates with BMS; thus, when faced with challenged biology, this low-cost and low-risk solution may still have merit.

Bone Marrow Stimulation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been proposed to augment healing at the time of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) by creating several bone marrow vents in the footprint of the rotator cuff, allowing mesenchymal stem cells, platelets, and growth factors to cover the area as a "crimson duvet."

PURPOSE

To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the outcomes after BMS and a control for those undergoing ARCR.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RCTs comparing BMS and a control for ARCR were included. Clinical outcomes were compared, and a P value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 7 RCTs with 576 patients were included. Overall, 18.8% of patients treated with BMS and 21.0% of patients treated with a control had a retear (I2 = 43%; P = .61). With BMS, the mean Constant score was 88.2, and with the control, the mean Constant score was 86.7 (P = .12). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (94.3 vs 93.2, respectively; P = .31) or visual analog scale score (0.9 vs 0.9, respectively; P = .89).

CONCLUSION

The level 1 evidence in the literature did not support BMS as a modality to improve retear rates or clinical outcomes after ARCR.

Effect of Bone Marrow Stimulation on Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a common orthopaedic procedure, but it has a high rate of retears that can negatively affect the functional outcomes. Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been suggested as an additional treatment to improve the outcomes of RCR.

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness of the BMS procedure during RCR with conventional RCR.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, on March 1, 2023, for studies comparing postoperative retear rates and functional outcomes between patients who underwent primary arthroscopic RCR with and without the BMS procedure. Only level 1 and 2 randomized controlled trials with a minimum 12-month follow-up were included. The primary outcomes were retear rates and functional outcomes as measured by the Constant; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES); and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores and by postoperative range of motion. Subgroup analyses were performed based on repair technique (single-row repair vs double-row or suture-bridge repair). The standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) were utilized to synthesize continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Homogeneity was evaluated using the chi-square test and I2 statistic.

Results

The literature search yielded 661 articles, of which 6 studies (522 patients; 261 with BMS, 261 without BMS) met the eligibility criteria. The combined analysis showed no significant decrease in retear rates with the utilization of the BMS procedure during RCR (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.03; P = .07; I2 = 24%). There was no significant intergroup difference in functional outcomes (Constant score: SMD, 0.13; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.31; P = .13; I2 = 0%; ASES score: SMD, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.28; P = .73; I2 = 0%; UCLA score: SMD, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.50 to 0.23; P = .47; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in postoperative retear risk or total Constant score according to the repair technique.

Conclusion

Based on the available evidence, this systematic review did not find a significant benefit of the BMS procedure at the footprint during arthroscopic RCR compared with conventional RCR in terms of retear rates and functional outcomes at short-term follow-up.

Bone channeling in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I studies

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing controversy regarding the effect of bone channeling in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Since the most recent systematic reviews in 2019, several large high-level trials have been completed. This study assessed all available level I randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without bone marrow channeling.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted through mid January 2023. Two reviewers performed screening of studies meeting the eligibility criteria: English-language RCTs in patients aged ≥18 years comparing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of full-thickness tears with and without bone marrow channeling (channeling group and control group, respectively). Functional scores, pain, healing rates, and reoperations were reviewed using pooled analysis where appropriate. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

A total of 6 randomized studies (N = 593) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis of all 6 studies showed no significant mean difference in function (1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.63 to 3.26), as measured by the Constant-Murley score. Retear rates were also not statistically different between groups (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.71), with pooled retear rates of 19.6% (48 of 245) with channeling and 19.8% (51 of 257) without. The other outcomes of interest were only available for analysis in a subset of studies. There were no standardized mean differences in pain (0.09; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.36), and there were similar reoperation rates (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.43 to 3.34) in the channeling and control groups. For the included studies, the overall quality of evidence by outcome was judged to be moderate (function, pain, and reoperations) or low (retear rates), mainly owing to risk of bias (all outcomes) and inconsistency (retear rates).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study refute the findings of prior systematic reviews that showed that channeling reduces the retear rate when combined with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This meta-analysis of level I evidence, including recent larger RCTs, demonstrates that bone marrow stimulation in the setting of primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has no significant effect on functional outcomes, healing, pain, or reoperation rates.

Indications and Technique: Rotator Cuff Repair Augmentation

Rotator cuff repair (RCR) augmentation is often considered for patients with large-to-massive rotator cuff tears or chronic tears with poor tissue quality. Augmentation can provide mechanical stability and improved biology to improve the likelihood of a successful repair. This article discusses the indications, diagnosis, surgical techniques, and outcomes for RCR augmentation using an acellular dermal allograft, partially demineralized cancellous allograft, dermal xenograft, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and platelet-rich plasma.

Microfracture Lateral to the Greater Tuberosity of the Humerus Enhances Tendon-to-Bone Healing in a Rat Rotator Cuff Model

BACKGROUND

Microfracture at the rotator cuff insertion is an established surgical marrow-stimulation technique for enhancing rotator cuff healing. However, the effect of lateralized or medialized microfracture on the insertion is unknown.

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical and histologic effects of microfracture at 3 different regions for rotator cuff repair in a rat model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 72 Sprague-Dawley rats with bilateral supraspinatus tendon insertion detachment were allocated into 4 groups with 4 different interventions: no microfracture at the humeral head as a control group (Con), traditional microfracture at the footprint area (MFA), and medialized microfracture to the footprint area (MMFA) on the articular surface of the humerus or lateralized microfracture to the footprint area at the greater tuberosity (LMFA). All underwent immediate repair. Tendon-to-bone healing was assessed by biomechanical and histologic tests 4 and 8 weeks postoperation.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, the LMFA group showed a significantly superior failure load compared with the other groups (all P < .05). The LMFA and MFA groups showed significantly superior stiffness compared with the Con and MMFA groups (all P < .01). At 8 weeks, superior failure load and stiffness were observed in the LMFA group compared with the control group (all P < .05). Histologic examination revealed that the LMFA group had superior collagen composition and tendon-to-bone maturation at the interface at 4 and 8 weeks compared with the Con group (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Lateralized microfracture at the greater tuberosity improved the histologic quality of repair tissue and biomechanical strength at the tendon-to-bone insertion after rotator cuff repair in a rat model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Microfracture lateral to the footprint area might be a better way to enhance rotator cuff healing clinically.

Interpositional scaffold anchor rotator cuff footprint tear repair: excellent survival, healing, and early outcomes

PURPOSE

Shoulder function limitation duration after a full-thickness rotator cuff tendon (RCT) tear may influence post-repair healing and outcomes. A suture anchor was developed to improve footprint repair fixation and healing through biological fluid delivery and scaffold augmentation. The primary multicenter study objective was to evaluate RCT repair failure rate based on 6-month MRI examination, and device survival at 1-year follow-up. The secondary objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of subjects with shorter- and longer-term shoulder function limitation duration.

METHODS

Seventy-one subjects (46 men) with moderate-to-large RCT tears (1.5-4 cm), at a median 61 years of age (range = 40-76), participated in this study. Pre-repair RCT tear location/size and 6-month healing status were confirmed by an independent radiologist. Subjects with shorter- (Group 1: 17.8 ± 21 days, n = 37) and longer-term (Group 2: 185.4 ± 89 days, n = 34) shoulder function limitation durations were also compared over 1 year for active mobility, strength, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's Shoulder Score (ASES score), Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain and instability scores.

RESULTS

Three of the 52 subjects [5.8%] who underwent 6-month MRI experienced a re-tear at the original RCT footprint repair site. By the 1-year follow-up, overall anchor survival was 97%. Although Group 2 displayed lower ASES and VR-12 scores pre-repair (ASES = 40.1 ± 17 vs. 47.9 ± 17; VR-12 physical health (PH) = 37.2 ± 9 vs. 41.4 ± 8) (p ≤ 0.048), at 3-month post-RCT repair (ASES = 61.3 ± 19 vs. 71.3 ± 20; VR-12 PH = 40.8 ± 8 vs. 46.8 ± 9) (p ≤ 0.038), and at 6-month post-RCT repair (ASES = 77.4 ± 18 vs. 87.8 ± 13; VR-12 PH = 48.9 ± 11 vs. 54.0 ± 9) (p ≤ 0.045), by 1-year post-RCT repair, groups did not differ (n.s.). Between-groups VR-12 mental health score differences were not evident at any time period (n.s.). Shoulder pain and instability VAS scores also did not differ (n.s.), displaying comparable improvement between groups from pre-RCT repair to 1-year post-RCT repair. Groups had comparable active shoulder mobility and strength recovery at each follow-up (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

At 6-month post-RCT repair, only 3/52 of patients [5.8%] had a footprint re-tear, and at 1-year follow-up, overall anchor survival was 97%. Use of this scaffold anchor was associated with excellent early clinical outcomes regardless of shoulder function impairment duration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

The role of bone marrow stimulation in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate whether RCR (rotator cuff repair) with BMS (bone marrow stimulation) can provide a lower retear rate and better shoulder function than arthroscopic RCR alone in rotator cuff tear (RCT) patients.

METHOD

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched until Feb 2022. Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials was evaluated by two independent reviewers with Cochrane collaboration risk bias of tool, and that for cohort studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The primary outcome was the retear rate. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Scale (UCLA) score, Constant-Murley score (CMS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the effect of suture method and tear size on BMS procedure.

RESULT

Five randomized controlled trials and four cohort studies with a total of 827 patients were included. The pooled retear rate between the RCR with BMS group and the RCR alone group was significantly different (17.5% vs. 28.9%; P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the ASES score, UCLA score and VAS score. The CMS was significantly higher in RCR with BMS group than the RCR alone groups (P = 0.02), while the difference was well below the MCID. RCR with BMS resulted in a significantly lower retear rate than RCR alone for large and massive RCTs (19.7% vs. 32.5%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared with RCR alone, RCR with BMS can significantly reduce the retear rate in arthroscopic RCT patients while not clinically relevant differences were found. BMS may further reduce the retear rate of large and massive RCTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Local Intraoperative Marrow-Derived Augmentation for Primary Rotator Cuff Repair: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies From 2010 to 2022

Background

Recurrent tears of the rotator cuff pose a substantial problem despite advances in repair technique. Biologic augmentation via marrow stimulation or vented anchors may strengthen the suture-tendon junction and improve healing rates of native tissue, thereby enhancing outcomes of primary surgical repair.

Purpose

To provide a focused systematic review and meta-analysis of local, intraoperative marrow-derived augmentation techniques in clinical primary rotator cuff repair.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 2131 studies from 2010 to 2022, focused on either marrow stimulation or vented anchors, were isolated and classified as either preclinical or clinical. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative marrow stimulation and vented anchor studies. Heterogeneity was tested through calculation of I ².

Results

A total of 13 clinical studies were included in the review. All 9 comparative studies included in the meta-analysis demonstrated high methodologic quality or a low risk of bias. The pooled retear rate across all 9 clinical studies for patients undergoing marrow stimulation was 11%. For the 5 studies in the meta-analysis, the pooled retear rates were 15% for marrow stimulation and 30% for controls. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant difference in the overall retear rate that favored marrow stimulation (odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.25-0.66; P = .0003; I ² = 0%). Similarly, meta-analysis of the Constant score at final follow-up demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups that favored a higher Constant score in the marrow stimulation group (mean difference, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.02-4.66; P = .002; I ² = 29%). Vented anchors demonstrated improved ossification and bone density at the anchor site, but no difference in outcomes or retear. Pooled retear rates were 22.5% for vented anchors and 27.8% for controls.

Conclusion

Current evidence demonstrates that marrow-stimulation techniques may have a positive impact on healing and retear rate, while vented anchors have a muted impact relative to nonvented anchors. Although available evidence is limited and more research is needed, findings to date suggest that marrow stimulation techniques may be an inexpensive, straightforward technique to consider in qualifying patients to prevent rotator cuff retears.

Intraoperative Channeling in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the retear rate remains high. New methods to optimize healing rates must be sought. Bone channeling may create a quicker and more vigorous healing response by attracting autologous mesenchymal stem cells, cytokines, and growth factors to the repair site.

HYPOTHESIS

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bone channeling would result in a higher healing rate compared with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without adjuvant channeling.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Our primary objective was to compare healing rates in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for degenerative tears, with and without bone channeling. Secondary objectives included comparisons of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, Constant strength subscore, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score between groups. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were recruited at 3 sites and were randomized to receive either bone channeling augmentation or standard repair. Healing was determined via ultrasound at 24 months postoperatively. WORC, ASES, and Constant scores were compared between groups at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2018. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no statistical differences in healing rates between the 2 interventions at 24 months postoperatively. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from preoperatively to all time points for the WORC, the ASES score, the Constant score or Constant strength subscore, and the VAS for pain (P < .0001). No differences were observed between the bone channeling and control groups in WORC, ASES, Constant, and VAS pain scores at any time point.

CONCLUSION

This trial did not demonstrate the superiority of intraoperative bone channeling in rotator cuff repair over standard rotator cuff repair at 24 months postoperatively. Healing rates, patient-reported function, and quality-of-life outcomes were similar between groups.

REGISTRATION

NCT01877772 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered a well-established method for treating knee and ankle osteochondral lesions. Some studies have also shown that BMS can promote healing of the repaired tendon and enhance biomechanical properties during rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair rotator cuff (ARCR) with and without BMS.

Methods

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 20, 2022. Data on retear rates, shoulder functional outcomes, visual analog score and range of motion were pooled and analyzed. Dichotomous variables were presented as odds ratios (OR), and continuous variables were presented as mean differences (MD). Meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3.

Results

Eight studies involving 674 patients were included, with mean follow-up period ranging from 12 to 36.8 months. Compared to ARCR alone, the intraoperative combination of the BMS resulted in lower retear rates (P < 0.0001), but showed similar results in Constant score (P = 0.10), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score (P = 0.57), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P = 0.23), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (P = 0.31), VAS (visual analog score) score (P = 0.34), and range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion, P = 0.42; external rotation, P = 0.21). After sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses, no significant changes in statistical results were observed.

Conclusion

Compared to ARCR alone, the combination of intraoperative BMS can significantly reduce the retear rates, but showed similar short-term results in functional outcomes, ROM and pain. Better clinical outcomes are anticipated in the BMS group by improving structural integrity during long-term follow-up. Currently, BMS may be a viable option in ARCR based on its straightforward and cost-effective advantages.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022323379.

A Review of Abductor Tendon Tears: The Hidden Lesion of the Hip

»

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome consists of a group of associated conditions involving the lateral hip that can be debilitating to patients, mostly women between ages 40 and 60 years.

»

Abductor tendon tears are becoming a more recognized cause of lateral hip pain in patients without hip osteoarthritis.

»

Diagnosis of this condition is critical to patient care because misdiagnosis often leads to unnecessary prolonged pain and even unnecessary procedures that address different pathologies.

»

Treatment strategies consists of nonoperative modalities such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, corticosteroid injections, and physical therapy, but for refractory cases, surgical techniques including repair, augmentation, and reconstruction have been well-described in the literature providing patients with acceptable outcomes.