Outpatient versus inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes and complications

Racial and gender disparities in utilization of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Utilization in outpatient total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) has increased significantly in recent years. It remains largely unknown whether utilization of outpatient TSA differs across gender and racial groups. This study aimed to quantify racial and gender disparities both nationally and by geographic regions.

METHODS

168,504 TSAs were identified using Medicare fee-for-service inpatient and outpatient claims data and beneficiary enrollment data from 2020 to 2022Q4. The percentage of outpatient cases, defined as cases discharged on the same day of surgery, was evaluated by racial and gender groups and by different census divisions. A multivariate logistics regression model controlling for patient sociodemographic information (White vs. non-White race, age, gender, and dual eligibility for both Medicare and Medicaid), hierarchical condition category (HCC) score, hospital characteristics, year fixed effects, and patient residency state fixed effects was performed.

RESULTS

The TSA volume per 1000 beneficiaries was 2.3 for the White population compared with 0.8, 0.6, and 0.3 for the Black, Hispanic, and Asian population, respectively. A higher percentage of outpatient TSAs were in White patients (25.6%) compared with Black patients (20.4%) (P < .001). The Black TSA patients were also younger, more likely to be female, more likely to be dually eligible for Medicaid, and had higher HCC risk scores. After controlling for patient sociodemographic characteristics and hospital characteristics, the odds of receiving outpatient TSAs were 30% less for Black than the White group (odds ratio 0.70). Variations were observed across different census divisions, with South Atlantic (0.67, P < .01), East North Central (0.56, P < .001), and Middle Atlantic (0.36, P < .01) being the 4 regions observed with significant racial disparities. Statistically significant gender disparities were also found nationally and across regions, with an overall odds ratio of 0.75 (P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Statistically significant racial and gender disparities were found nationally in outpatient TSAs, with Black patients having 30% (P < .001) fewer odds of receiving outpatient TSAs than White patients, and female patients with 25% (P < .001) fewer odds than male patients. Racial and gender disparities continue to be an issue for shoulder arthroplasties after the adoption of outpatient TSAs.

Outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and adverse events

BACKGROUND

In recent years, orthopaedic procedures have increasingly shifted from inpatient to outpatient settings. This trend includes total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), which is being performed more frequently in outpatient facilities and ambulatory surgical centres. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and rates of adverse events between outpatient and inpatient TSA.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) databases were screened for articles comparing outpatient to inpatient TSA through June 2024, using relevant and holistic search terms. Non-comparative articles and those utilizing national databases were excluded from our study. Data on complications, myocardial infarction (MI), thromboembolic events, anaemia/transfusions, infections, readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, revision surgery, and patient reported outcome measures at one year (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 14 articles were included in our study, involving 1070 outpatient and 1330 inpatient TSA patients. Patients in the inpatient group were older and had a higher ASA compared to the patients in the outpatient group. The outpatient TSA group was found to have significantly lower rates of overall complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, p = 0.001), medical complications (OR = 0.43, p < 0.001), and readmissions (OR = 0.47, p = 0.008), as well as higher mean ASES scores (81.4 vs. 78.5, p = 0.01) when compared to the inpatient TSA group. There were no significant differences in rates of ED visits (p = 0.27), revisions (p = 0.06), and VAS scores (p = 0.15) between inpatient and outpatient TSA groups.

CONCLUSION

TSAs performed in the outpatient setting had a lower rate of overall adverse events, medical complications, readmissions, and a higher ASES score compared to inpatient TSAs. However, since patients in the inpatient group had higher ASA and were older, our results support the safety of the outpatient TSA based on the current selection criteria.

A Systematic Review of Patient Selection Criteria for Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

The utilization of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is increasing, driving associated annual health care costs higher. Opting for outpatient over inpatient TSA may provide a solution by reducing costs. However, there is no single set of accepted patient selection criteria for outpatient TSA. Here, the authors identify and systematically review 14 articles to propose evidence-based criteria that merit postoperative admission. Together, the studies suggest that patients with limited ability to abmluate independently or a history of congestive heart failure may benefit from postoperative at least one night of hospital based monitoring and treatment.

Outpatient versus inpatient shoulder arthroplasty outcomes using an updated patient-selection algorithm: minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), with the majority of studies focusing on 90-day outcomes and complications. Patient selection algorithms have helped appropriately choose patients for an outpatient TSA setting. This study aimed to determine the outcomes of TSA between outpatient and inpatient cohorts with at least a 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified patients older than 18 years who underwent a TSA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up in either an inpatient or outpatient setting. Using a previously published outpatient TSA patient-selection algorithm, patients were allocated into three groups: outpatient, inpatient due to insurance requirements, and inpatient due to not meeting algorithm criteria. Outcomes evaluated included visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, range of motion (ROM), strength, complications, readmissions, and reoperations. Analysis was performed between the outpatient and inpatient groups to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of outpatient TSA with midterm follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 779 TSA were included in this study, allocated into the outpatient (N = 108), inpatient due to insurance (N = 349), and inpatient due to algorithm (N = 322). The average age between these groups was significantly different (59.4 ± 7.4, 66.5 ± 7.5, and 72.5 ± 8.7, respectively; P < .0001). All patient groups demonstrated significant improvements in preoperative to final patient-outcomes scores, ROM, and strength. Analysis between cohorts showed similar final follow-up outcome scores, ROM, and strength, with few significant differences that are likely not clinically different, regardless of surgical location, insurance status, or meeting patient-selection algorithm. Complications, reoperations, and readmissions between all three groups were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

This study reaffirms prior short-term follow-up literature. Transitioning appropriate patients to outpatient TSA results in similar outcomes and complications compared to inpatient cohorts with midterm follow-up.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid: 90-day complication profile in the inpatient versus outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a nonspherical humeral head component and inlay glenoid is a successful bone-preserving treatment for glenohumeral arthritis. This study aimed to describe the 90-day complication profile of TSA with this prosthesis and compare major and minor complication and readmission rates between inpatient- and outpatient-procedure patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing TSA with a nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid in the inpatient and outpatient settings by a single surgeon between 2017 and 2022. Age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and 90-day complication and readmission rates were compared between inpatient and outpatient groups.

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen TSAs in 111 patients were identified. Mean age was 64.9 years (range, 39-90) and 65% of patients were male. Ninety-four (80%) and 24 (20%) patients underwent outpatient and inpatient procedures, respectively. Four complications (3.4%) were recorded: axillary nerve stretch injury, isolated ipsilateral arm deep venous thrombosis (DVT), ipsilateral arm DVT with pulmonary embolism requiring readmission, and gastrointestinal bleed requiring readmission. There were no reoperations or other complications. Outpatients were younger with lower ASA and CCI scores than inpatients; however, there was no difference in complications (1/24 vs. 3/94, P=1.00) or readmissions (1/24 vs. 1/94, P=0.37) between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TSA with a nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid can be performed safely in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Rates of early complications and readmissions were low with no difference according to surgical setting. Level of evidence: IV.

Prospective cohort study of same-day discharge shoulder arthroplasty in patients of 85 years and younger

Introduction

Shoulder arthroplasty is mostly performed as an inpatient procedure. Same-day discharge arthroplasty has shown positive results in hip and knee surgery. Primary objective of this study was to investigate whether a safe and satisfactory same-day discharge (SDD) can be predicted with a set of easy to use predefined criteria, without increasing complications and re-admissions.

Methods

This study was a prospective cohort study. Patient selection criteria were: <85 years old, ASA 1, 2, and mild ASA 3. Primary outcome variables were successful SDD, complications, re-admissions and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome scores. The results are compared with the inpatient cohort.

Results

In total, 163 patients were treated for elective shoulder arthroplasty. Of which 51 patients were selected for same-day discharge arthroplasty. 94% of pre-planned same-day discharge arthroplasty patients were discharged on the day of surgery. In the same-day discharge group, there were no complications related to the early discharge and a 2% readmission rate as opposed to a 3% readmission rate in the inpatient group. Surgery related as well as medical complications did not differ between the same-day discharge and inpatient cohort.

Discussion

Same-day discharge shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and satisfying treatment option in selected patient groups.

Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty in the ambulatory surgery center: a comparison of early complications in patients with and without glenoid bone loss

Background

The purpose of this study is to compare the 90-day complications and readmission rates between patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) with glenoid bone loss requiring an augmented glenoid component compared to patients without bone loss.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing outpatient TSA at an ASC (2018-2021). Readmission, direct transfer, and complications were recorded. Major and minor complications were compared. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, range of motion, and patient-reported outcome measures.

Results

There were 44 patients (45 shoulders) included in the study, 20 with augmented implants for glenoid bone loss and 25 nonaugmented with a concentric glenoid. There were no statistical differences in demographics. Two complications were seen in both the augmented and nonaugmented groups (10% vs. 8%). There were no readmissions or direct transfers. The augmented group had significantly increased preoperative glenoid retroversion (23° vs. 9°, P < .05), posterior humeral head subluxation (78% vs. 61%., P < .05), and longer operative time (124.4 min vs. 112.3 min., P < .05). Patient-specific instrumentation was used in 60% of augmented cases and 29% of nonaugmented cases.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in complications, direct transfers, or readmissions between patients with and without glenoid bone loss being treated in an outpatient ASC. The augmented group had significantly worse preoperative deformities, longer operative times, and increased utilization of patient-specific instrumentation. Outpatient TSA in the setting of glenoid bone loss requiring augmentation was found to be safe and effective at a stand-alone ASC.

Patient outcomes after revision total shoulder arthroplasty in an inpatient vs. outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is becoming an increasingly common surgical procedure for numerous shoulder conditions. The incidence of revision TSA is increasing because of the increase in primary TSA and the increased utilization of TSA in younger patients. Conducting revision TSA as an outpatient procedure would be beneficial in limiting expenditure and resource allocation but must show a similar complication profile compared to inpatient revision TSA in order to justify its clinical value. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of outpatient revision TSA to inpatient revision TSA and outpatient primary TSA.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried from 2010-2019 to identify all patients who underwent revision TSA (n = 1456) in either an inpatient or outpatient setting, as well as patients who underwent primary TSA in an outpatient setting (n = 2630). Relevant demographic characteristics were compared between the outpatient revision group and both the inpatient revision and outpatient primary groups. Postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperation rates were also compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing inpatient revision TSA exhibited increased rates of preoperative hypertension (P = .013) and had increased prevalence of severe American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P = .021) compared to patients undergoing outpatient revision TSA. Patients undergoing outpatient revision TSA were significantly more likely to experience complications (P < .001), have longer surgical times (P < .001), and undergo readmission (P = .006) and reoperation (P = .049) compared to patients undergoing outpatient primary TSA. There was no significant increase in rates of overall complication, readmission, or reoperation between patients undergoing revision TSA in an outpatient vs. an inpatient setting.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient revision TSA has higher complication rates, readmission, and reoperation rates compared to outpatient primary TSA, similar to previous findings when comparing revision and primary TSA done as an inpatient. However, there was no increased risk of complications, readmission, or reoperation for outpatient revision TSA compared to inpatient revision TSA. Outpatient revision TSA should be considered by orthopedic surgeons in patients who are medically healthy to undergo the procedure as an outpatient surgery.

Procedure Cost Comparison of Outpatient and Inpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty and Lower-Extremity Arthroplasty Within a Managed-Care Organization

Introduction The authors sought to evaluate cost differences between shoulder arthroplasties and lower-extremity joint replacements in the outpatient and inpatient setting within a large health-maintenance organization. Methods A cross-sectional study of 100 total hip arthroplasties (THA), 100 total knee arthroplasties (TKA), and 100 shoulder arthroplasties (50 anatomical total shoulder arthroplasties and 50 reverse shoulder arthroplasties [RTSA]) was performed at a single regional health care center within an integrated health care maintenance organization. A time-driven activity-based costing methodology was used to obtain total cost of each episode for outpatient (vs) inpatient surgery. Results are presented by procedure type. Results Compared to their respective inpatient procedure, outpatient surgery was less expensive by 20% for RTSA, 22% for total shoulder arthroplasties, 29% for THA, and 30% for TKA. The cost of implants was the highest proportion of cost for all joint procedures across inpatient and outpatient settings, ranging from 28% of the total cost for inpatient THA to 63% of the cost for outpatient RTSA. Discussion Although many factors influence the total cost for arthroplasty surgery, including rate of hospitalization, duration of stay, operative time, complexity of cases, patient factors, equipment, and resource utilization, the implant cost remains the most expensive factor, with hospital bed admission status being the second costliest contribution. Conclusion Outpatient total arthroplasty substantially reduced procedure expenses in a managed-care setting by 20%-30%, although savings for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty was lower than savings for THA or TKA. Implant costs remain the largest portion of shoulder arthroplasty procedure expenses.

Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty in the COVID-19 era: 90-day complications and risk factors

BACKGROUND

With the COVID-19 pandemic placing an increased burden on health care systems, shoulder arthroplasties are more commonly being performed as outpatient procedures. The purpose of this study was to characterize the 90-day episode-of-care complications of consecutive shoulder arthroplasties defaulted for outpatient surgery without using a prior algorithm for patient selection and to assess for their risk factors. We hypothesized that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty would be a safe procedure for all patients, regardless of patient demographics and comorbidities.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent planned outpatient anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty between March 2020 and January 2022 with 3-month follow-up was performed. All patients were scheduled for outpatient surgery regardless of medical comorbidities. Patient demographics; pre/postoperative patient-reported outcomes including visual analog scale, subjective shoulder value, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; pre/postoperative range of motion; and complications were collected from medical chart review. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of the following outcomes: 1. Unplanned overnight hospital stay, 2. 90-day unplanned emergency department (ED)/clinic visit, 3. 90-day hospital readmission, 4. 90-day complications requiring revision.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven patients (47% male, 17% tobacco users, 18% diabetics) with a mean age 69 ± 9 years were identified, of whom 92 underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and 35 underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. All patient-reported outcomes and range of motion were significantly improved at 3 months. There were 15 unplanned overnight hospital stays (11.8%) after the procedure. Within 90 days postoperatively, there were 17 unplanned ED/clinic visits (13.4%), 7 hospital readmissions (5.5%), and 4 complications requiring revision (3.1%). Factors predictive of unplanned overnight stay included age above 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 36.80 [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.20-615.49]; P = .012), tobacco use (OR, 12.90 [95% CI, 1.23-135.31]; P = .033), and American Society of Anesthesiologists status of 3 (OR, 13.84 [95% CI, 1.22-156.57]; P = .034). The only factor predictive of unplanned ED/clinic visit was age over 70 years old (OR, 7.52 [95% CI, 1.26-45.45]; P = .027). No factors were predictive of 90-day hospital readmission or revision.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is a safe procedure with excellent outcomes and low rates of readmissions and can be considered as the default plan for all patient undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Patients who are above 70 years of age, use tobacco, and have ASA score of 3, however, may be less suitable for outpatient arthroplasty and should be counseled regarding the higher risk of unplanned overnight hospitalization.

Perioperative pain control represents the primary concern for patients considering outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a survey-based study

BACKGROUND

Outpatient (OP) total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with same-day discharge can now be performed safely in appropriately selected patients. Patient knowledge and perspectives regarding OP TSA are yet unknown and such information may inform surgeon decision-making and provide a framework for addressing patient concerns. The goal of this study was to understand and quantify patient knowledge of and concerns for OP TSA, with a working hypothesis that majority of patients are unaware of OP TSA as a realistic option and that their primary concern would be postoperative pain control.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic medical center including patients who underwent anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty and completed an OP TSA expectations questionnaire/survey. This survey was provided preoperatively and included demographic factors, self-rated health evaluation, and perioperative expectations. Surveys evaluated whether patients undergoing TSA had any prior awareness of OP TSA and evaluated their primary concern with same-day discharge. Secondary questions included an assessment of patient expectations of outcomes of outpatient vs. inpatient surgery as well as their expected length of inpatient stay.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients who underwent anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty completed the questionnaire and comprised the study cohort. Fifty-two (42.6%) of the patients were unaware that OP TSA was an option, and 26 (50%) of these were comfortable with the idea of OP TSA. Comfort with OP TSA was significantly associated with higher subjective patient-reported health status. Fifty-eight patients (47.5%) expected that following TSA they would require <24 hours of in-hospital postoperative care. The primary concern for patients considering OP TSA was postoperative pain control, endorsed by 44.3% of patients, compared with 13.1% of patients stating this would be their primary concern if admitted as an inpatient postoperatively. Pain control being a primary concern was significantly different between those considering outpatient vs. inpatient TSA. Most patients anticipated that OP shoulder arthroplasty would lead to a better (36%) or comparable (53%) outcome, whereas only 11% had concerns that it would lead to a worse outcome.

CONCLUSION

Expanding OP TSA crucially depends on awareness and education. Perceived ability to control pain is an important concern. Patients may benefit from preoperative counseling, including emphasizing a comprehensive postoperative pain management strategy.

The transition to outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Transitioning shoulder arthroplasty (SA) from an inpatient to outpatient procedure is associated with increased patient satisfaction and potentially decreased costs; however, concerns exist about complications following same-day discharge. We hypothesized that outpatient SA would be associated with low rates of failed discharges, readmissions, and complications, rendering it a safe and effective option for SA.

METHODS

A systematic review of the outpatient SA literature identified 16 of 447 studies with level III and IV evidence that met the inclusion criteria with at least 90 days of follow-up. Data on patient demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative protocols, surgery characteristics, failed discharges, complications, and readmissions were collected and pooled for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 990 patients were included in our analysis. Many studies identified specific institutional protocols for determining eligibility for outpatient SA, including preoperative clearance from an anesthesiologist; identification of a perioperative caretaker; and exclusion of patients based on cardiac, pulmonary, or hematologic risk factors. Failed same-day discharge occurred in only 0.9% of patients (7 of 788), and 2.1% of patients (9 of 418) and 0.79% of patients (2 of 252) presented to an emergency department or urgent care facility for a perioperative concern. The readmission rate for periprosthetic fracture, arthrofibrosis, infection, subscapularis rupture, and anterior subluxation was 1.3% (7 of 529 patients). Complications occurred in 7.0% of patients (70 of 990), with 5.4% of patients (53 of 990) experiencing a surgical complication and 1.7% (17 of 990) having a medical complication. There were 28 total reoperations (2.9%, 28 of 955 patients).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Outpatient SA is associated with low rates of failed discharges, readmissions, and complications. Additionally, the medical and surgical complications that occur after outpatient SA are unlikely to be prevented by the short inpatient stay characteristic of traditional SA. With careful screening measures to identify appropriate candidates for same-day discharge, outpatient SA represents a safe approach to prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and to decrease costs associated with SA.

Trends in outpatient shoulder arthroplasty during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) era: increased proportion of outpatient cases with decrease in 90-day readmissions

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic has placed an increased burden on health care resources, with hospitals around the globe canceling or reducing most elective surgical cases during the initial period of the pandemic. Simultaneously, there has been an increased interest in performing outpatient total joint arthroplasty in an efficient manner while maintaining patient safety. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) during the COVID-19 era with respect to outpatient surgery and postoperative complications.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all primary anatomic and reverse TSAs performed at our health institution over a 3-year period (January 2018 to January 2021). All cases performed prior to March 2020 were considered the "pre-COVID-19 era" cohort. All cases performed in March 2020 or later comprised the "COVID-19 era" cohort. Patient demographic characteristics and medical comorbidities were also collected to appropriately match patients from the 2 cohorts. Outcomes measured included type of patient encounter (outpatient vs. inpatient), total length of stay, and 90-day complications.

RESULTS

A total of 567 TSAs met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 270 shoulder arthroplasty cases performed during the COVID-19 era and 297 cases performed during the pre-COVID-19 era. There were no significant differences in body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, smoking status, or distribution of pertinent medical comorbidities between the 2 examined cohorts. During the COVID-19 era, 31.8% of shoulder arthroplasties were performed in an outpatient setting. This was significantly higher than the percentage in the pre-COVID-19 era, with only 4.5% of cases performed in an outpatient setting (P < .0001). The average length of stay was significantly reduced in the COVID-19 era cohort (0.81 days vs. 1.45 days, P < .0001). There was a significant decrease in 90-day readmissions during the COVID-19 era. No significant difference in 90-day emergency department visits, 90-day venous thromboembolism events, or 90-day postoperative infections was observed between the 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant increase in the number of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty cases being performed at our health institution during the COVID-19 era, likely owing to a multitude of factors including improved perioperative patient management and increased hospital burden from the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase in outpatient cases was associated with a significant reduction in average hospital length of stay and a significant decrease in 90-day readmissions compared with the pre-COVID-19 era. The study data suggest that outpatient TSA can be performed in a safe and efficient manner in the appropriate patient cohort.

Trends in outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty over time

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to investigate changes over time.

Methods

Patients undergoing primary TSA during 2006-2019 as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified. Patients were divided into an early cohort (2006-2016, 12,401 patients) and a late cohort (2017-2019, 12,845 patients). Outpatient procedures were defined as those discharged on the day of surgery. Patient comorbidities and rate of adverse events within 30 days postoperatively were compared with adjustment for baseline characteristics using standard multivariate regression.

Results

There was a significant reduction in complications over time when considering all cases (5.69% in the early cohort vs. 3.67% in the late cohort, adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.73, P < .001). The rate of complications decreased over time among inpatients (5.80% vs. 3.90%, adjusted RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60-0.76, P < .001). However, there was no difference in the rate of complications among outpatients over time (1.98% vs. 1.38%, adjusted RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.28-1.47, P = .293). There were significantly more complications among inpatients vs. outpatients in both the early and late cohorts (early: 5.80% vs. 1.98%, adjusted RR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.24-5.34, P = .011, late: 3.90% vs. 1.38%, adjusted RR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.39-3.74, P = .001). TSA became more common in elderly patients over 70 years of age over time in both the inpatient and outpatient cohorts, whereas fewer young patients (aged 18-59 years) underwent TSA in the late cohorts than in the early cohorts for both the inpatient and outpatient samples (P < .001).

Conclusion

The overall complication rate of TSA has decreased over time as outpatient TSA has become increasingly common. When contemporary data are examined, the complication rate of outpatient procedures has remained constant over time while that of inpatient procedures decreased, despite the changing demographics of patients undergoing TSA. This indicates that outpatient TSA remains a safe procedure as patient selection criteria have evolved, while the safety of inpatient TSA continues to improve.