Special Report from the CDC Antidepressant subclass use and fall risk in community-dwelling older Americans

Comparative analysis of psychiatric medications and their association with falls and fractures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

An association between psychiatric medications and falls and fractures in people taking them has been demonstrated, but which class or medication leads to the greatest risk of falls or fractures should be further investigated. The aim of this study was to compare and rank the magnitude of risk of falls and fractures due to different psychiatric medications. Eight databases were searched for this meta-analysis and evaluated using a frequency-based network meta-analysis. The results included a total of 28 papers with 14 medications from 5 major classes, involving 3,467,314 patients. The results showed that atypical antipsychotics were the class of medications with the highest risk of falls, and typical antipsychotics were the class of medications with the highest risk of resulting in fractures. Quetiapine ranked first in the category of 13 medications associated with risk of falls, and class Z drugs ranked first in the category of 6 medications associated with risk of fractures. The available evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotics and typical antipsychotics may be the drugs with the highest risk of falls and fractures, respectively. Quetiapine may be the medication with the highest risk of falls, and class Z drugs may be the medication with the highest risk of fractures.

Association between tricyclic antidepressants and health outcomes among older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tricyclic antidepressants are effective for managing depression and other disorders. However, they can cause adverse reactions due to their anticholinergic properties, with the risk of such events increasing with age. This study identifies and describes clinical studies that evaluate associations between the use of tricyclic antidepressants and adverse health outcomes (falls, fractures, and mortality) among older people. A systematic search of the literature in English, Spanish, and French was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane. The systematic review included a total of 18 studies. The meta-analysis examined the 14 studies that investigated the association between the use of tricyclic antidepressants and the risk of falls and fractures (4 of the 18 studies focused on mortality and so were excluded from the meta-analysis). The odds ratio (OR) was 1.40 (95 % CI = 1.27-1.53, p < 0.001). The Cochran Q test was significant (X2 = 79.72, p < 0.001), indicating high heterogeneity (I2 = 84.9 %). An additional meta-analysis was conducted on studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs), yielding an HR of 1.21 (95 % CI = 0.93-1.58, p = 0.16). Meta-regression analysis indicated that the years of follow-up could have a significant effect on the association studied (p = 0.008). In conclusion, enhancing our understanding of the use of antidepressants and the associated risk of adverse events in older adults will enable the identification of the most appropriate type of antidepressant for each clinical situation.

Impact of medication intensification on 30-day hospital readmissions in a geriatric trauma population: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Fall-related injuries are a significant health issue that occur in 25% of older adults and account for a significant number of trauma-related hospitalizations. Although medication intensification may increase the risk of hospital readmissions in non-trauma patients, data on a geriatric trauma population are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of medication intensification on 30-day hospital readmissions in geriatric patients hospitalized for fall-related injuries.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with geriatric who presented to one of three trauma centers within a large, health-system between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. Patients at least 65 years old admitted with a fall-related injury were eligible for inclusion. Patients were grouped according to medication changes at discharge, which included intensified and non-intensified groups. Medication intensification included increased dose(s) or initiation of new agents. The primary outcome was the 30-day hospital readmission rate.

RESULTS

Of the 870 patients included (median [interquartile range, IQR] age, 82 [74-89] years, 522 (60%) female, and 220 (25%) with a previous fall), there were 471 (54%) and 399 (46%) patients in the intensified and non-intensified groups, respectively. The intensified group had a higher 30-day hospital readmission rate (21% intensified vs. 16% non-intensified, p = 0.043; number needed to harm 20) based on an unweighted analysis. According to a weighted propensity score logistic regression, medication intensification was associated with higher 30-day hospital readmissions (24% [95% confidence interval [CI] 19-31%] intensified vs. 15% [95% CI 11-20%] non-intensified, p = 0.018). These results were consistent within competing risk models accounting for death (cause-specific model: hazard ratio [HR] 1.63 [95% CI 1.07-2.49], p = 0.023; Fine-Gray model: HR 1.64 [95% CI 1.07-2.50], p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

In a geriatric trauma population hospitalized after a fall, intensification of medications may pose an increased risk of 30-day hospital readmission.

Risk of Falls Associated with Long-Acting Benzodiazepines or Tricyclic Antidepressants Use in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Nationwide Population-Based Case–Crossover Study

Background: Falls are common in older adults and increase in recent years. This study aimed to examine the risk of falls associated with long-acting benzodiazepines (BZDs) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) use in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: A nationwide population-based case–crossover design was used. We screened information on 6,370,275 fall or fall fracture cases among community-dwelling elderly patients from the database of the national health insurance data warehouse in South Korea. We extracted the data of elderly patients who visited the hospital for a fall and were diagnosed with the first fall or fall fracture after prescription of long-acting BZDs (n = 1805) or TCAs (n = 554). The study used conditional logistic regression analysis to analyze the associations and stratified analysis by gender and age group to control for their confounding effects. Results: Risk of falls or fall fractures increased by more than two times after taking long-acting BZDs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.85–2.52) or TCAs (OR = 2.13; 95% CI = 1.62–2.83). The longer the prescription period of both, the higher the risk of falls or fall fractures was (≥49 days for long-acting BZDs vs. ≥ 56 days for TCAs). Conclusions: Long-acting BZDs or TCAs should be avoided or prescribed for a shorter duration based on these adverse effects. Health care providers should focus on fall prevention practices in older adults who take such drugs.

A comparative analysis of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and fall risk in older adults

BACKGROUND

One in five older adults (age 65+) uses an antidepressant medication. However, little is known about how fall risk differs between commonly prescribed medications. We examine the comparative association between individual selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and self-reported falls in older adults.

METHODS

We used data from 2010-2017 Medicare Current Beneficiary Surveys, a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries. We included participants from three different panels surveyed over two successive years. Participants were limited to community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries 65+, enrolled in Medicare Part D, and taking an SSRI (n = 1023) during baseline years. Participants were asked about demographic and health characteristics, medication use (including dose, frequency, duration of use) and self-reported falls as any fall or recurrent falls in the past year. We compared individual SSRI (citalopram or escitalopram vs sertraline) use by the average monthly total standardized daily dose (TSDD) and self-reported falling, controlling for potential confounders. Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted using SAS-callable SUDAAN.

RESULTS

Citalopram/escitalopram (n = 460 users; 45.0% of all SSRI users) and sertraline (n = 294 users; 28.7% of all SSRI users) were the most commonly prescribed SSRIs. Overall, 36.3% of citalopram/escitalopram users and 39.4% of sertraline users reported a fall in the year following medication use. There were no statistically significant differences between sertraline and citalopram/escitalopram users of either low or medium TSDD levels in the risk of self-reported any or recurrent falls. However, users of high TSDD of sertraline (>75 mg) had a lower risk of recurrent falls compared to high TSDD citalopram (>30 mg) or escitalopram (>15 mg) daily for 30 days.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest a potential comparative safety benefit of sertraline compared to citalopram/escitalopram at high doses related to recurrent falls. Additional comparative studies of individual antidepressants may better inform fall risk management and prescribing for older adults.