1
|
Han ES, Hong SK, Hong K, Hong SY, Lee JM, Choi Y, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS. Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy in patients over 50 years old: Why age should not be a barrier. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15117. [PMID: 37658832 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given the global aging population, the average age of liver donors is increasing. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of grafts from pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) in liver donors aged > 50 years. METHODS The medical records of liver donors were retrospectively reviewed. The donors underwent conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) from January 2011 to May 2019 or PLDRH from March 2016 to May 2019. We divided the donors into three groups: PLDRH donors aged ≥50 (n = 26; Group 1) and aged < 50 (n = 257; Group 2), and CDRH donors aged ≥50 years (n = 66; Group 3). RESULTS Operation time (p < .01) and hospital stay (p < .01) were significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 3. Other postoperative outcomes of donors including graft anatomical variation, graft weight, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and hepatic steatosis were similar among the three groups. Although no postoperative complications occurred in Groups 1 and 3, they were detected in 17 cases (6.6%) in Group 2. No postoperative complications were detected among the recipients. CONCLUSIONS PLDRH was feasible and safe in donors aged over 50 years, with outcomes similar to those for donors aged <50 years. PLDRH should not be avoided solely based on the donor's age ≥50 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eui Soo Han
- Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu ST. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu-si, South Korea
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwangpyo Hong
- Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu-si, South Korea
| | - Su Young Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kanneganti M, Olthoff KM, Bittermann T. Impact of Older Donor Age on Recipient and Graft Survival After LDLT: The US Experience. Transplantation 2023; 107:162-171. [PMID: 36042545 PMCID: PMC9771867 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of selecting older donors for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States is incompletely studied, particularly in light of the recent expansion of LDLT nationally. METHODS Adult LDLTs from January 01, 2005 to December 31, 2019 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Multivariable Cox models evaluated living donor (LD) age as a predictor of LDLT recipient and graft survival. The impact of increasing donor age on recipient outcomes was compared between LD and deceased donor recipients. Donor postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS There were 3539 LDLTs at 65 transplant centers during the study period. Despite the recent expansion of LDLT, the proportion of LDs aged ≥50 y was stable. There were no clinically significant differences in recipient or donor characteristics by LD age group. LD age ≥50 y was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.49 ( P = 0.012) for recipient survival and 1.61 ( P < 0.001) for graft survival (vs LDs aged 18-29 y). The negative impact of increasing donor age on graft survival was more profound after LDLT than deceased donor liver transplantation (interaction P = 0.019). There was a possible increased rate of early donor biliary complications for donors >55 y (7.1% versus 3.1% for age <40 y; P = 0.156). CONCLUSIONS Increasing LD age is associated with decreased recipient and graft survival, although older donors still largely yield acceptable outcomes. Donor outcomes were not clearly impacted by increasing age, though this warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mounika Kanneganti
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Kim M. Olthoff
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Therese Bittermann
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ling S, Jiang G, Que Q, Xu S, Chen J, Xu X. Liver transplantation in patients with liver failure: Twenty years of experience from China. Liver Int 2022; 42:2110-2116. [PMID: 35532977 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is the only effective method of treating end-stage liver disease, such as various types of liver failure. China has the largest number of patients with hepatitis B virus-related disease, which is also the main cause of liver failure. From the first LT performed in 1977, and especially over the past two decades, LT has experienced rapid development as a result of continuous research and innovation in China. China performs the second-highest number of LTs every year worldwide, and the quality of LT continues to improve. Starting January 1, 2015, all donor's livers have been from deceased donors and familial donors. Thus, China entered into a new era of LT. However, LT is still a challenging procedure in China. In this review, we introduced the brief history of LT in China, the epidemiology, aetiology and clinical outcomes of LT for liver failure in China and summarized the experience of LT from Chinese LT surgeons and scholars. The future perspectives of LT were also discussed, and it is expected that China's LT research could be further integrated elsewhere in the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunbin Ling
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Center for Integrated Oncology and Precision Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guangjiang Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Center for Integrated Oncology and Precision Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qingyang Que
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Center for Integrated Oncology and Precision Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shengjun Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Center for Integrated Oncology and Precision Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China
| | - Junli Chen
- National Center for Healthcare Quality Management of Liver Transplant, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Center for Integrated Oncology and Precision Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China.,National Center for Healthcare Quality Management of Liver Transplant, Hangzhou, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li M, Chu Z, Tan Z, Jin Y, Xu M, Ji Q. Impact of donor age on liver regeneration and function following adult living donor liver transplantation. Exp Ther Med 2019; 17:3965-3970. [PMID: 31007739 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.7454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of donor age on liver function and regeneration following living donor liver transplantation. Donors were divided into an elderly donor group (age >50 years old; n=8) and a young donor group (age <30 years old; n=35). The recipients were also divided into an elderly group (age >50 years old; n=5) and a young group (age <30 years old; n=25). Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin (TB) and prothrombin time were recorded 1-5 days postoperatively. The liver regeneration ratio (LRR) was recorded 7 and 15 days postoperatively in donors and at 0.5, 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively in recipients by contrast-enhanced multi-slice spiral computed tomography. Notably, the LRR in the young donor group was significantly increased compared with that in the elderly donor group at 7 days postoperatively (P<0.05). Among recipients, TB in the elderly group was significantly increased compared with that in the young group at 1-5 days postoperatively (P<0.05). The residual liver regeneration rate was decreased and the time of jaundice was prolonged in recipients in the elderly group 7 days postoperatively, but donor age had little impact on the short-term outcome of the residual liver and graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyang Li
- First Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Zhiqiang Chu
- Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Zhijun Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Yanyu Jin
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Min Xu
- First Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Qian Ji
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dar FS, Khan NY, Ali R, Khokhar HK, Zia HH, Bhatti ABH, Shah NH. Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Cureus 2019; 11:e4174. [PMID: 31093473 PMCID: PMC6502282 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The impact of donor age on liver transplantation is well known. Data on an appropriate donor age cut-off for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with a background of hepatitis C (HCV) is generally limited. The objective of this study was to determine whether limiting donor age to less than 35 years improved outcomes in patients with HCV-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Methods This was a retrospective review of 169 patients who underwent LDLT for HCV-related ESLD. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received grafts from donors ≤ 35 (Group 1) or > 35 (Group 2) years of age. Kaplan Meier curves were used to determine survival. Uni and multivariate analysis were performed to determine independent predictors of mortality. Results Mean donor age was 25.1 ± 5.2 and 40.1 ± 3.4 years (P < 0.0001). Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was seen in 11.7% patients in Group 1 versus 29.6% in Group 2 (P = 0.02). A significant difference in mortality was present between the two groups, i.e., 33.3% versus 15.8% (P = 0.04). The estimated four-year overall survival (OS) was 78% and 64% (P = 0.03). Upon doing univariate analysis, the donor age (P = 0.04) and EAD (P = 0.006) were found to be significant variables for mortality. On multivariate analysis, EAD was the only independent predictor of mortality (Hazard ratio: 2.6; confidence interval: 1.1 - 5.8; P = 0.01). Conclusion Opting for younger donors (≤ 35 years) for HCV-related ESLD patients lowers the risk of EAD and improves overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal S Dar
- Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, PAK
| | - Nusrat Y Khan
- Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, PAK
| | - Rubab Ali
- Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, PAK
| | | | - Haseeb H Zia
- Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, PAK
| | | | - Najmul H Shah
- Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lan X, Zhang H, Li HY, Chen KF, Liu F, Wei YG, Li B. Feasibility of using marginal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:2441-2456. [PMID: 29930466 PMCID: PMC6010938 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i23.2441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most effective treatments for end-stage liver disease caused by related risk factors when liver resection is contraindicated. Additionally, despite the decrease in the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) over the past two decades, the absolute number of HBsAg-positive people has increased, leading to an increase in HBV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Consequently, a large demand exists for LT. While the wait time for patients on the donor list is, to some degree, shorter due to the development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there is still a shortage of liver grafts. Furthermore, recipients often suffer from emergent conditions, such as liver dysfunction or even hepatic encephalopathy, which can lead to a limited choice in grafts. To expand the pool of available liver grafts, one option is the use of organs that were previously considered “unusable” by many, which are often labeled “marginal” organs. Many previous studies have reported on the possibilities of using marginal grafts in orthotopic LT; however, there is still a lack of discussion on this topic, especially regarding the feasibility of using marginal grafts in LDLT. Therefore, the present review aimed to summarize the feasibility of using marginal liver grafts for LDLT and discuss the possibility of expanding the application of these grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Lan
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hua Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hong-Yu Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ke-Fei Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yong-Gang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A Donor Age-Based and Graft Volume-Based Analysis for Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Elderly Recipients. Transplant Direct 2017; 3:e168. [PMID: 28706971 PMCID: PMC5498009 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Given the expected increase in the number of elderly recipients, details regarding how clinical factors influence the outcome in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for the elderly remain unclear. We examined the survival outcomes according to the results of donor age-based and graft volume–based analyses and assessed the impact of prognostic factors on the survival after LDLT for elderly recipients. Methods The 198 adult recipients were classified into 2 groups: an elderly group (n = 70, E group; ≥ 60 years of age) and a younger group (n = 128, Y group; <60 years of age). We analyzed the prognostic factors for the survival in the E group and the survival rate for both groups at several follow-up points and conducted subgroup analyses in the E group by combining the donor age (≥50 vs <50 years) and graft weight (GW)/standard liver volume (SLV) (≥40% vs <40%). Results Donor age (hazard ratio [HR], 2.17; P = 0.062) and GW/SLV (HR, 1.80; P = 0.23) tended to have a high HR in the E group. The overall patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 78.3%, 73.0%, and 61.0% in the E group, and 82.0%, 75.1%, and 69.2% in the Y group, respectively (P = 0.459). However, the outcomes tended to be worse in recipients of grafts from donors ≥50 years of age than in those with grafts from younger donors with GW/SLV < 40% (P = 0.048). Conclusions A worse outcome might be associated with aging of the donor, which leads to impairment of the graft function and liver regeneration. Both the graft volume and donor age should be considered when choosing grafts for LDLT in elderly patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lué A, Solanas E, Baptista P, Lorente S, Araiz JJ, Garcia-Gil A, Serrano MT. How important is donor age in liver transplantation? World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:4966-4976. [PMID: 27275089 PMCID: PMC4886372 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i21.4966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2016] [Revised: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The age of liver donors has been increasing in the past several years because of a donor shortage. In the United States, 33% of donors are age 50 years or older, as are more than 50% in some European countries. The impact of donor age on liver transplantation (LT) has been analyzed in several studies with contradictory conclusions. Nevertheless, recent analyses of the largest databases demonstrate that having an older donor is a risk factor for graft failure. Donor age is included as a risk factor in the more relevant graft survival scores, such as the Donor Risk Index, donor age and Model for End-stage Liver Disease, Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation, and the Balance of Risk. The use of old donors is related to an increased rate of biliary complications and hepatitis C virus-related graft failure. Although liver function does not seem to be significantly affected by age, the incidence of several liver diseases increases with age, and the capacity of the liver to manage or overcome liver diseases or external injuries decreases. In this paper, the importance of age in LT outcomes, the role of donor age as a risk factor, and the influence of aging on liver regeneration are reviewed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tokodai K, Kawagishi N, Miyagi S, Nakanishi C, Hara Y, Fujio A, Kashiwadate T, Maida K, Goto H, Kamei T, Ohuchi N. Poor Long-Term Outcomes of Adult Liver Transplantation Involving Elderly Living Donors. Transplant Proc 2016; 48:1130-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Revised: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
10
|
Wen T, Li C, Li L. Assessment of the Patient Before Liver Resection. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN LIVER RESECTION 2016:13-19. [DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-7411-6_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
11
|
Sutherland AI, IJzermans JNM, Forsythe JLR, Dor FJMF. Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly. Br J Surg 2015; 103:e62-72. [PMID: 26662845 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transplant surgery is facing a shortage of deceased donor organs. In response, the criteria for organ donation have been extended, and an increasing number of organs from older donors are being used. For recipients, the benefits of transplantation are great, and the growing ageing population has led to increasing numbers of elderly patients being accepted for transplantation. METHODS The literature was reviewed to investigate the impact of age of donors and recipients in abdominal organ transplantation, and to highlight aspects of the fine balance in donor and recipient selection and screening, as well as allocation policies fair to young and old alike. RESULTS Overall, kidney and liver transplantation from older deceased donors have good outcomes, but are not as good as those from younger donors. Careful donor selection based on risk indices, and potentially biomarkers, special allocation schemes to match elderly donors with elderly recipients, and vigorous recipient selection, allows good outcomes with increasing age of both donors and recipients. The results of live kidney donation have been excellent for donor and recipient, and there is a trend towards inclusion of older donors. Future strategies, including personalized immunosuppression for older recipients as well as machine preservation and reconditioning of donor organs, are promising ways to improve the outcome of transplantation between older donors and older recipients. CONCLUSION Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly is a clinical reality. Outcomes are good, but can be optimized by using strategies that modify donor risk factors and recipient co-morbidities, and personalized approaches to organ allocation and immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A I Sutherland
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J N M IJzermans
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J L R Forsythe
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - F J M F Dor
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dai Y, Li C, Wen TF, Yan LN. Comparison of liver resection and transplantation for Child-pugh A cirrhotic patient with very early hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension. Pak J Med Sci 2014; 30:996-1000. [PMID: 25225514 PMCID: PMC4163220 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.305.5038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2014] [Revised: 05/26/2014] [Accepted: 05/30/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of liver transplantation and resection for very early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, ≤ 2 cm) patients with Child-pugh A liver function and portal hypertension. Methods: From 2008 to 2013, 38 patients with Child-pugh class A liver function and portal hypertension were diagnosed as very early HCC, of whom 13 patients who received liver transplantation and 25 patients underwent liver resection. We compared the preoperative characteristics, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of two group. Results: The baseline characteristics of two groups were similar. No perioperative mortality and liver failure were observed in both groups. The 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates of patients received liver resection and liver transplantation were 92.3%, 92.3% 92.3% and 92.0%, 71.7% and 64.5% respectively (P=0.140). The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of two groups were also similar (100%, 91.7% and 91.7% for group T versus 100%, 93.3% and 93.3% for group R, P=0.695). Conclusion: Liver resection can offer satisfactory outcomes for very early HCC patients with well liver function and portal hypertension and should be considered as the first line choice for selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Dai
- Yan Dai, Department of Day Surgery Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu (610041), China
| | - Chuan Li
- Chuan Li, Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu (610041), China
| | - Tian-Fu Wen
- Tian-Fu Wen, Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu (610041), China
| | - Lu-Nan Yan
- Lu-Nan Yan, Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu (610041), China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Han JH, You YK, Na GH, Kim EY, Lee SH, Hong TH, Kim DG. Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation using elderly donors. Ann Surg Treat Res 2014; 86:184-91. [PMID: 24783177 PMCID: PMC3996718 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.4.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2013] [Revised: 11/05/2013] [Accepted: 11/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using elderly donors is increasing in frequency in response to organ shortage. However, elderly donor graft has been reported to negatively affect graft patency and patient survival. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 604 patients who underwent LDLT at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea between May 1999 and September 2012. Elderly donors were defined as those ≥55 years of age. Here, we evaluate the survival differences and causes of death of recipients of elderly donor grafts. Results The overall mortality rate of the recipients was significantly higher in the elderly donor group (group A) than in the younger donor group (group B: 46.2% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.004). The survival length of group A was significantly shorter than that of group B (31.2 ± 31.3 and 51.4 ± 40.8 months, P = 0.014). The significantly common causes of death in group A were biliary (41.7%) and arterial complication (16.7%), and it was higher than those in group B (P = 0.000 and P = 0.043, respectively). Conclusion LDLT using elderly donors could induce more serious complications and higher mortality rates than those at using younger donors. As such, careful donor selection is needed, especially with regard to assessing the condition of potential elderly donor livers. Furthermore, a large-volume and multicenter study of complications and outcomes of LDLT using elderly donor liver is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hyun Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Kyoung You
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gun Hyung Na
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Young Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Ho Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Ho Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Goo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|