Delayed family reunification of pediatric disaster survivors increases mortality and inpatient hospital costs: a simulation study

Review of the requirements for effective mass casualty preparedness for trauma systems. A disaster waiting to happen?

Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) are diverse, unpredictable, and increasing in frequency, but preparation is possible and necessary. The nature of MCIs requires a trauma response but also requires effective and tested disaster preparedness planning. From an international perspective, the aims of this narrative review are to describe the key components necessary for optimisation of trauma system preparedness for MCIs, whether trauma systems and centres meet these components and areas for improvement of trauma system response. Many of the principles necessary for response to MCIs are embedded in trauma system design and trauma centre function. These include robust communication networks, established triage systems, and capacity to secure centres from threats to safety and quality of care. However, evidence from the current literature indicates the need to strengthen trauma system preparedness for MCIs through greater trauma leader representation at all levels of disaster preparedness planning, enhanced training of staff and simulated disaster training, expanded surge capacity planning, improved staff management and support during the MCI and in the post-disaster recovery phase, clear provision for the treatment of paediatric patients in disaster plans, and diversified and pre-agreed systems for essential supplies and services continuity. Mass casualty preparedness is a complex, iterative process that requires an integrated, multidisciplinary, and tiered approach. Through effective preparedness planning, trauma systems should be well-placed to deliver an optimal response when faced with MCIs.

US Hospital Preparedness to Manage Unidentified Individuals and Reunite Unaccompanied Minors with Family Members During Disasters: Results from a Nationwide Survey

Unaccompanied minors and other unidentified individuals may present to hospitals during disasters and require reunification with family. Hospital preparedness for family reunification during disasters has never been assessed. We sent members of the Association of Healthcare Emergency Preparedness Professionals an anonymous online survey in July and August 2019 to assess their hospital's reunification readiness during a disaster. Scores on preparedness to manage unidentified patients were calculated based on 21 indicators, each with a score of 0 or 1. A multivariate linear regression was conducted to delineate factors associated with higher preparedness scores. In total, 88 individuals participated (response rate = 33.4%). All agreed that reunification preparedness is important, but far fewer (χ² = 33.8, P < .001) believed their hospital was prepared to reunify unidentified individuals during a disaster (n = 58, 65.9%). Most (n = 56, 63.6%) had at least some written reunification plan. Preparedness scores ranged from 0 to 21 (mean = 8.0, standard deviation = 7.3). Predictors of preparedness included having a pediatrician on the hospital disaster planning committee, conducting a disaster exercise that simulated an unaccompanied minor scenario, and implementing the 2018 American Academy of Pediatrics Reunification Planning Tool. Findings from this study indicate that many US hospitals are not prepared to reunify unaccompanied minors or other separated family members during a disaster. The planning tool is a free resource that hospitals can use to improve their hospital reunification plans. Hospitals should prioritize development of reunification plans to ensure rapid response during a future event. Use of the planning tool can aid in development and improvement of these plans.