Transfer of acute care surgery patients in a rural state: a concerning trend

Disparities in outpatient rural cholecystectomy outcomes

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed comparable outcomes for common in-patient general surgery operations, but it is unknown if this extends to outpatient operations. Our aim was to compare outpatient cholecystectomy outcomes between rural and urban hospitals.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was done using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample for patients 20-years-and-older undergoing cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 ​at rural and urban hospitals. Survey-weighted multivariable regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes including use-of-laparoscopy, complications, and patient discharge disposition.

RESULTS

The most common indication for operation was cholecystitis in both hospital settings. On multivariable analysis, rural hospitals were associated with higher transfers to short-term hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.40, 95%CI 1.61-3.58, p ​< ​0.01) and complications (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.11-1.75, p ​< ​0.01). No difference was detected with laparoscopy (aOR 1.93, 95%CI 0.73-5.13, p ​= ​0.19), routine discharge (aOR 1.50, 95%C I0.91-2.45, p ​= ​0.11), or mortality (aOR 3.23, 95%CI 0.10-100.0, p ​= ​0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients cared for at rural hospitals were more likely to be transferred to short-term hospitals and have higher complications. No differences were detected in laparoscopy, routine discharge or mortality.

The Impact of the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit on Quaternary Care Accessibility for Rural Patients: A Comparative Analysis

Background

Previous research suggests that patients from rural areas who are critically ill with complex medical needs or require time-sensitive subspecialty interventions face worse healthcare outcomes and delays in care when compared to those from urban areas. The critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) at our quaternary care center was established to expedite the transfer of critically ill patients or those who need time-sensitive intervention. This study investigates if disparities exist in treatments and outcomes among patients transferred to the CCRU from rural versus urban hospitals.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of adult, nontrauma patients admitted to the CCRU via interhospital transfer from outside facilities from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Patients transferred from within our institution or with missing clinical data were excluded. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to measure the association between patients' demographic and clinical factors with in-hospital mortality.

Results

We analyzed 1381 nontrauma patients, and 484 (35%) were from rural areas. Median age was 59 [47-69], and 629 (46%) were female. Median sequential organ failure assessment was 3 ([1-6], p=0.062) for both patients transferred from urban and rural hospitals. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to most demographic and clinical factors, as well as types of interventions after CCRU arrival, including emergent surgical interventions within 12 hours of arrival at the CCRU. Rural patients were more likely to be transferred for care by the acute care emergency surgery service than were patients from urban areas and were transferred over a significantly greater distance (difference of 53 kilometers (km), 95% CI: -58.9-51.7 km, P < 0.001). Transfer from rural areas was not associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.60, 1.36; P=0.63).

Conclusion

Thirty-five percent of patients transferred to the CCRU came from rural areas, which house 25% of the state population of Maryland. Patients transferred from rural counties to the CCRU faced greater transport distances, but they received the same level of care upon arrival at the CCRU and had the same odds of in-hospital mortality as patients transferred from urban hospitals.

Perforated peptic ulcer disease in transferred patients is associated with significant increase in length of stay

BACKGROUND

Perforated peptic ulcer disease (PPUD) has a prevalence of 0.004-0.014% with mortality of 23.5% (Tarasconi et al. in World J Emerg Surg 15(PG-3):3, 2020). In this single center study, we examined the impact associated with patient transfer from outside facilities to our center for definitive surgical intervention (exploratory laparotomy).

METHODS

Using EPIC report workbench, we identified 27 patients between 2018 and 2021 undergoing exploratory laparotomy with a concurrent diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease, nine of which were transferred to our institution for care. We queried this population for markers of disease severity including mortality, length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and readmission rates. Manual chart reviews were performed to examine these outcomes in more detail and identify patients who had been transferred to our facility for surgery from an outside hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients were identified undergoing exploratory laparotomy for definitive treatment of PPUD. The majority of patients queried underwent level A operations, the most urgent level of activation. In our institution, a Level A operation needs to go to the operating room within one hour of arrival to the hospital. Average mortality for this patient population was 14.8%. The readmission rate was 40.1%, and average length of ICU stay post-operatively was 16 days, with 83% of non-transfer patients requiring ICU admission and 100% of transfer patients requiring ICU admission, although this was not found to be statistically significant. Average length of hospital stay was 27 days overall. For non-transfer patients and transfer patients, LOS was 20 days and 41 days, respectively, which was statistically significant by one-sided t-test (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients transferred for definitive care of PPUD in a population otherwise notable for high mortality and high readmission rates: their average length of stay compared to non-transfer patients was over twice the length, which was statistically significant. Transferred patients also had higher rates of ICU care requirement although this was not statistically significant. Further inquiry to identify modifiable variables to facilitate the care of transferred patients is warranted, especially in the context of improving quality metrics known to enhance patient outcomes, satisfaction, and value.

Operation of national coordinating service for interhospital transfer from emergency departments: experience and implications from Korea

BACKGROUND

Since 2014, Korea has been operating the National Emergency Medical Situation Room (NEMSR) to provide regional emergency departments (EDs) with coordination services for the interhospital transfer of critically ill patients. The present study aimed to describe the NEMSR's experience and interhospital transfer pattern from EDs nationwide, and investigate the factors related to delayed transfers or transfers that could not be arranged by the NEMSR.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the NEMSR's coordination registry from 2017 to 2019. The demographic and hospital characteristics related to emergency transfers were analyzed with hierarchical logistic models.

RESULTS

The NEMSR received a total of 14,003 requests for the arrangement of the interhospital transfers of critically ill patients from 2017 to 2019. Of 10,222 requests included in the analysis, 8297 (81.17%) successful transfers were coordinated by the NEMSR. Transfers were requested mainly due to a shortage of medical staff (59.79%) and ICU beds (30.80%). Delayed transfers were significantly associated with insufficient hospital resources. The larger the bed capacity of the sending hospital, the more difficult it was to coordinate the transfer (odds ratio [OR] for transfer not arranged = 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-2.82, ≥ 1000 beds vs. < 300 beds) and the longer the transfer was delayed (OR for delays of more than 44 minutes = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.57-2.76, ≥ 1000 beds vs. < 300 beds).

CONCLUSIONS

The operation of the NEMSR has clinical importance in that it could efficiently coordinate interhospital transfers through a protocolized process and resource information system. The coordination role is significant as information technology in emergency care develops while regional gaps in the distribution of medical resources widen.

Documenting surgical triage in rural surgical networks: Formalising existing structures

OBJECTIVE

It is essential that the embedded process of rural case selection be highlighted and documented to provide reassurance of rigour across rural surgical services supported by generalist surgeons, general practitioners with enhanced surgical skills and general practitioner anaesthetists. This enables feedback and improves the triage and case selection process to ensure the highest quality outcomes. Therefore, this research aims to explore participants' rational criteria for decision making around rural case selection.

DESIGN

Participants participated in a series of semi-structured in-depth interviews which were coded and underwent thematic analysis.

SETTING

Six community hospitals in British Columbia, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

General practitioners with enhanced surgical skills, general practitioner anaesthetists, local maternity care providers, and specialists.

RESULTS

Based on participant accounts, rural surgical and obstetrical decision-making processes for local patient selection or regional referral had five major components: (1) Clinical Factors, (2) Physician Factors, (3) Patient Factors, (4) Consensus Between Providers and (5) the Availability of Local Resources.

CONCLUSION

Decision-making processes around rural surgical and obstetrical patient selection are complex and require comprehensive understanding of local capacity and resources. Current policies and guidelines fail to consider the varying capacities of each rural site and should be hospital specific.

Emergency General Surgery Quality Improvement: A Review of Recommended Structure and Key Issues

Emergency general surgery (EGS) accounts for 11% of hospital admissions, with more than 3 million admissions per year and more than 50% of operative mortality in the US. Recent research into EGS has ignited multiple quality improvement initiatives, and the process of developing national standards and verification in EGS has been initiated. Such programs for quality improvement in EGS include registry formation, protocol and standards creation, evidenced-based protocols, disease-specific protocol implementation, regional collaboratives, targeting of high-risk procedures such as exploratory laparotomy, focus on special populations like geriatrics, and targeting improvements in high opportunity outcomes such as failure to rescue. The authors present a collective narrative review of advances in quality improvement structure in EGS in recent years and summarize plans for a national EGS registry and American College of Surgeons verification for this under-resourced area of surgery.

Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Despite three million adults in the United States (US) being admitted annually for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, we lack an understanding of the barriers to round-the-clock EGS care. Our objective was to measure gaps in round-the-clock EGS care.

METHODS

From August 2015 to December 2015, we surveyed all US-based, adult acute care general hospitals that have an emergency room and ≥1 operating room and provide EGS care, utilizing paper and electronic methods. Surgeons or chief medical officers were queried regarding EGS practices.

RESULTS

Of 2,811 hospitals, 1,634 (58.1%) responded; 279 (17.1%) were unable to always provide round-the-clock EGS care. Rural location, smaller bed size, and non-teaching status were associated with lack of round-the-clock care. Inconsistent surgeon coverage was the primary reason for lacking round-the-clock EGS care (n=162; 58.1%). However, lack of a tiered system for booking emergency cases, no anesthesia availability overnight, and no stipend for EGS call were also associated with the inability to provide round-the-clock EGS care.

DISCUSSION

We found significant gaps in access to EGS care, often attributable to workforce deficiencies.

Optimizing Safety for Surgical Patients Undergoing Interhospital Transfer

Interhospital transfers play a key role in ensuring that patients receive necessary care. However, patients who are transferred between hospitals are a vulnerable population, and outcomes of transferred patients are suboptimal. Despite the critical nature of interhospital transfers, only limited effort has been dedicated to standardization and improvement of the transfer process. Studying and adapting quality improvement efforts directed at other transitions of care, particularly those that cross between different facilities and care teams "such as the transition from hospital to home or extended care facilities" may improve the care of surgical patients transferred between acute care institutions.

Impact of interhospital transfer on patient outcomes in emergency general surgery

BACKGROUND

Emergency general surgery patients are at an increased risk for morbidity and mortality compared to their elective surgery counterparts. The complex nature of emergency general surgery conditions can challenge community hospitals, which may lack appropriate systems and personnel. Outcomes related to transfer have not been well-established. We aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of patients who were transferred from another hospital to a center with dedicated acute care surgery services with patients admitted directly to the acute care surgery centers.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of a national, multicenter review of emergency general surgery patients undergoing complex emergency general surgery at 5 centers across Canada. The primary outcome was the development of any complication. The adjusted odds of postoperative complication was assessed using logistic regression, controlling for age, comorbidities, duration of stay before transfer, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and booking priority.

RESULTS

A total of 1,846 patients were included in the study, and 176 (9.5%) were transferred. Of these 21% (n = 37) underwent an operative procedure, and 15% (n = 27) underwent an operation at the transferring center. Transferred patients were more likely to have at least 1 comorbidity (68% vs 57%; P = .004), were classified as greater urgency on arrival (<2 hours booking priority, 43% vs 17%; P < .001), had a greater American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3 = 81% vs 65%; P < .001), a greater duration of operation (119 vs 110 minutes; P = .004), and were more likely to undergo a second operation (28% vs 14%; P < .001) compared to patients directly admitted to an acute care surgery center. On univariate analysis, transferred patients had greater rates of complications (48% vs 31%; P < .001), mortality (14% vs 7%; P = .005), and admission to the intensive care unit (22% vs 12%; P < .001). Transfer status remained an independent predictor of complication (odds ratio 1.9 [95% confidence interval 1.3-2.7]; P < .001) and intensive care unit admission (odds ratio 1.9 [95% confidence interval 1.2-3.0]; P = .007), but not mortality (odds ratio 1.1 [95% confidence interval 0.6-1.9]; P = .79) on regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Complex emergency general surgery patients transferred to acute care surgery centers may have worse outcomes and greater use of resources compared to those admitted directly. This finding has clinically and financially important implications for the design and regionalization of acute care surgery services as well as resource allocation at acute care surgery centers.

An evaluation of emergency general surgery transfers and a call for standardization of practices

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing trend toward regionalization of emergency general surgery, which burdens patients. The absence of a standardized, emergency general surgery transfer algorithm creates the potential for unnecessary transfers. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical reasoning prompting emergency general surgery transfers and to initiate a discussion for optimal emergency general surgery use.

METHODS

Consecutive emergency general surgery transfers (December 2018 to May 2019) to 2 tertiary centers were prospectively enrolled in an institutional review board-approved protocol. Clinical reasoning prompting transfer was obtained prospectively from the accepting/consulting surgeon. Patient outcomes were used to create an algorithm for emergency general surgery transfer.

RESULTS

Two hundred emergency general surgery transfers (49% admissions, 51% consults) occurred with a median age of 59 (18 to 100) and body mass index of 30 (15 to 75). Insurance status was 25% private, 45% Medicare, 21% Medicaid, and 9% uninsured. Weekend transfers (Friday to Sunday) occurred in 45%, and 57% occurred overnight (6:00 pm to 6:00 am). Surgeon-to-surgeon communication occurred with 22% of admissions. Pretransfer notification occurred with 10% of consults. Common transfer reasons included no surgical coverage (20%), surgeon discomfort (24%), or hospital limitations (36%). A minority (36%) underwent surgery within 24 hours; 54% did not require surgery during the admission. Median length of stay was 6 (1 to 44) days.

CONCLUSION

Conditions prompting emergency general surgery transfers are heterogeneous in this rural state review. There remains an unmet need to standardize emergency general surgery transfer criteria, incorporating patient and hospital factors and surgeon availability. Well-defined requirements for communication with the accepting surgeon may prevent unnecessary transfers and maximize resource allocation.

Rural Surgical Quality: Policy and Practice

Several national studies have demonstrated that rural hospitals successfully deliver high-quality care. Data at the national, regional, institutional, and individual practitioner levels all contribute to understanding of surgical outcomes in the rural setting. Quality metrics should be interpreted within the context of the rural community and outcomes analyzed with relevant risk adjustment for patient factors.

Dealing with the Sick Rural Surgery Patient in Need of Transfer

Care for rural and urban surgical patients is increasingly more complex due to advancing knowledge and technology. Interhospital transfers occur in approximately 10% of index encounters at rural hospitals secondary to mismatch of patient needs and local resources. Due to the recent expansion of air transport to rural areas, distance and geography are less of a barrier. The interhospital transfer process is understudied and far from standardized. Interhospital transfer status is associated with increase in mortality, complications, length of stay, and costs. The cost, price to patients, and safety of air ambulance transports cannot be ignored.

The Surgical and Anesthesia Workforce and Provision of Surgical Services in Rural Communities: A Mixed-Methods Examination

PURPOSE

Rural-urban disparities in the surgical and anesthesia workforce exist. This mixed-methods study describes the distribution of the surgical and anesthesia workforce and qualitatively explores how such workforce and other factors influence rural hospitals' provision of surgical services.

METHODS

We calculated provider counts by county from the Area Health Resource File. Using American Hospital Association survey data, we sampled rural hospitals, stratified by critical access status and state policies. We conducted qualitative semistructured interviews with administrators at 16 hospitals and performed directed content analysis of factors influencing surgical services provision at rural hospitals.

FINDINGS

Within rural counties, 55.1% of counties had no surgeon, 81.2% had no anesthesiologist, and 58.1% had no Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA). Administrators reported that rural hospitals struggled to provide many surgical services given lack of subspecialty surgeons and adequate postsurgical care. Rural hospitals likely struggle to generate volumes necessary to support safe and profitable subspecialty surgery programs. Anesthesia services were not reported as a current limitation given that CRNAs in particular had strong, diverse skills sets and many hospitals allowed high CRNA autonomy. However, meeting anesthesia needs for emergency surgeries and 24-hour obstetrics posed significant challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

While rural hospitals reported meeting community needs for elective and noncomplex surgeries, rural hospitals continued to face significant challenges providing subspecialty surgeries, emergency surgeries, and 24-hour obstetrical services.

Comparison of Urologic Transfers to Academic Medical Centers: A Multi-institutional Perspective

OBJECTIVE

To examine urologic transfers and rate of tertiary center interventions from 4 geographically distinct academic medical centers.

METHODS

Four academic medical centers were selected for this study including Baylor College of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of Kentucky, and University of Pennsylvania Hospital (Penn). Baylor College of Medicine and Penn primarily service large metropolitan city centers and University of Kentucky and University of Alabama at Birmingham primarily service large rural populations. Transfer logs were pulled for each institution over a 2-year period, and a retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate transfer diagnosis and need for procedural management upon admission. Date of transfer, transfer diagnosis, and interventions performed during tertiary center admission were extracted from the transfer log data sets. The transfer diagnosis was categorized into 1 of 11 mutually exclusive categories.

RESULTS

Overall, 984 urologic transfers were included. Sixty-nine percent (682/984) of patients were transferred to the 2 rural centers, and 30.7% (302/984) were transferred to the 2 metropolitan centers. The most common reason for transfer was nephrolithiasis at 26% (256 of 984 transfers). The overall surgical intervention rate for all urologic transfers in this study was 44.4% (437 of 984 total transfers). Rural center transfers had a lower rate of surgical intervention than metropolitan centers (42.7% vs 48.3%) as well as a markedly higher number of total transfers during the study period (682 vs 302).

CONCLUSION

Given that a majority of patients did not require surgical intervention, methods for avoiding unnecessary urologic transfers are warranted.

Pro-con debate on regionalization of emergency general surgery: controversy or common sense?

More than three million patients every year develop emergency general surgical (EGS) conditions and this number is rising. EGS diseases range from straightforward to potentially life-threatening, and if severe or complex may require extensive resources. Given the looming surgeon shortage and concerns about access to care, regionalization of EGS care, in a manner similar to trauma care, has been proposed. We present a unique pro-con debate highlighting the salient arguments for and against regionalization of EGS care in the USA.

Variations in the Delivery of Emergency General Surgery Care in the Era of Acute Care Surgery

BACKGROUND

Acute care surgery (ACS) was proposed to improve emergency general surgery (EGS) care; however, the extent of ACS model adoption in the United States is unknown. A national survey was conducted to ascertain factors associated with variations in EGS models of care, with particular focus on ACS use.

METHODS

A hybrid mail/electronic survey was sent in 2015 to 2,811 acute care hospitals with an emergency room and an operating room. If a respondent indicated that the approach to EGS was a dedicated clinical team whose scope encompasses EGS (± trauma, ± elective general surgery, ± burns), the hospital was considered an ACS hospital.

RESULTS

Survey response was 60.1% (n = 1,690); 272 (16.1%) of these hospitals reported having used an ACS model of care for EGS patients. Teaching status and general hospital practices (for example, interventional radiology available within one hour) were associated with ACS use. In bivariate analyses, ACS use was associated with many EGS-specific practices (40.1% of ACS hospitals freed their surgeons of daytime clinical responsibilities after operating overnight vs. 4.7% of general surgeon on call (GSOC) hospitals; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There are wide variations in EGS practices in the United States, with use of an ACS model of care being relatively low despite reported benefits of ACS models of care on EGS access, quality, and costs. Hospital factors associated with using ACS models are overall size and higher level of existing resources. These findings could be applied to the development of centers of excellence for EGS care.

Disparities in access to emergency general surgery care in the United States

BACKGROUND

As fewer surgeons take emergency general surgery call and hospitals decrease emergency services, a crisis in access looms in the United States. We examined national emergency general surgery capacity and county-level determinants of access to emergency general surgery care with special attention to disparities.

METHODS

To identify potential emergency general surgery hospitals, we queried the database of the American Hospital Association for "acute care general hospital," with "surgical services," and "emergency department," and ≥1 "operating room." Internet search and direct contact confirmed emergency general surgery services that covered the emergency room 7 days a week, 24 hours a day. Geographic and population-level emergency general surgery access was derived from Geographic Information Systems and US Census.

RESULTS

Of the 6,356 hospitals in the 2013 American Hospital Association database, only 2,811 were emergency general surgery hospitals. Counties with greater percentages of black, Hispanic, uninsured, and low-education individuals and rural counties disproportionately lacked access to emergency general surgery care. For example, counties above the 75th percentile of African American population (10.2%) had >80% odds of not having an emergency general surgery hospital compared with counties below the 25th percentile of African American population (0.6%).

CONCLUSION

Gaps in access to emergency general surgery services exist across the United States, disproportionately affecting underserved, rural communities. Policy initiatives need to increase emergency general surgery capacity nationwide.

Geographic Diffusion and Implementation of Acute Care Surgery: An Uneven Solution to the National Emergency General Surgery Crisis

Importance

Owing to lack of adequate emergency care infrastructure and decline in general surgery workforce, the United States faces a crisis in access to emergency general surgery (EGS) care. Acute care surgery (ACS), an organized system of trauma, general surgery, and critical care, is a proposed solution; however, ACS diffusion remains poorly understood.

Objective

To investigate geographic diffusion of ACS models of care and characterize the communities in which ACS implementation is lagging.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A national survey on EGS practices was developed, tested, and administered at all 2811 US acute care hospitals providing EGS to adults between August 2015 and October 2015. Surgeons responsible for EGS coverage at these hospitals were approached. If these surgeons failed to respond to the initial survey implementation, secondary surgeons or chief medical officers at hospitals with only 1 general surgeon were approached.

Interventions

Survey responses on ACS implementation were linked with geocoded hospital data and national census data to determine geographic diffusion of and access to ACS.

Main Outcomes and Measures

We measured the distribution of hospitals with ACS models of care vs those without over time (diffusion) and by US counties characterized by sociodemographic characteristics of county residents (access).

Results

Survey response rate was 60% (n = 1690); 272 responding hospitals had implemented ACS by 2015, steadily increasing from 34 in 2001 to 125 in 2010. Acute care surgery implementation has not been uniform. Rural regions have limited ACS access, with hospitals in counties with greater than the 75th percentile population having 5.4 times higher odds (95% CI, 1.66-7.35) of implementing ACS than hospitals in counties with less than 25th percentile population. Communities with greater percentages of adults without a college degree also have limited ACS access (OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.81-6.48). However, incorporating EGS into ACS models may be a potential equalizer for poor, black, and Hispanic communities.

Conclusions and Relevance

Understanding and addressing gaps in ACS implementation across communities will be crucial to ensuring health equity for US residents experiencing general surgery emergencies.