Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction

Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma Outcomes and Cost: Analysis of the Kids’ Inpatient Database

Objective:

To report trends in Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma (JNA) hospitalizations and identify key factors affecting treatment outcomes and cost of care in JNA patients.

Methods:

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids’ Inpatient Database was queried for all cases of JNA between the years of 1997 and 2016. Key factors extracted were patient demographics, geographic region, hospital size, teaching status, elective admissions, and number of diagnoses and procedures performed during the hospitalization. These elements were correlated to length of stay (LOS) and cost-per-day (CPD) using a multiple linear regression (MLR). Regional variation in JNA diagnosis and changes in LOS and CPD trends over time were also analyzed.

Results:

A total of 614 JNA patients were hospitalized in this time period, with a majority of patients identifying as male (98%) and Caucasian/White (55%). The average LOS has decreased by 0.14 day per year since 1997 ( P = .0034) whereas the CPD has steadily increased by $2 380 per year ( P < .001). MLR analysis revealed that while holding all other factors constant, patients who stayed at teaching hospitals had an increased LOS of 1.7 days ( P = .026), but paid $11 961 less per day ( P = .05). Regional variation in CPD was found in the Northeast region, where hospitalizations were more expensive by $9 801 per day compared to the South ( P = .017).

Conclusion:

These results indicate hospital characteristics, such as teaching status and geographic region, may predict differences in JNA outcomes and cost. Healthcare providers should be cognizant of these variations to ensure optimal patient outcomes and expenditures.

Complete Impact of Care Fragmentation on Readmissions Following Urgent Abdominal Operations

BACKGROUND

Urgent abdominal operations commonly occurred in low-volume hospitals with high failure-to-rescue rates. Recent studies have demonstrated a survival benefit associated with readmission to the original hospital after operation, presumably due to improved continuity of care. It is unclear if this survival benefit persists in low-volume hospitals. We seek to evaluate differences in mortality between readmission to the original hospital and a higher-volume hospital after urgent abdominal operations.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the National Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014 was performed. Propensity score-weighted multilevel regression analysis was used to examine the association between readmission destination and mortality after accounting for hospital volume.

RESULTS

A total of 71,551 adult patients who experienced 30-day readmission following urgent abdominal operations were identified, among whom 10,368 (14.5%) were readmitted to a different hospital. Patients with higher baseline comorbidity scores, lower income, less comprehensive insurance coverage, systemic complications, prolonged length of stay, or non-home disposition were more likely to experience readmission to a different hospital. Following stratification by readmission hospital volume and propensity score weighting to adjust for baseline mortality risk differences, readmission to a different hospital is still associated with higher mortality rates than the original hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The adverse outcomes associated with case fragmentation are present even after adjusting for readmission hospital volume. Patients who received urgent abdominal operations at low-volume hospitals should return to the original hospital for concern of care fragmentation.