1
|
Wang TN, Woelfel IA, Huang E, Pieper H, Meara MP, Chen X(P. Behind the pattern: General surgery residsent autonomy in robotic surgery. Heliyon 2024; 10:e31691. [PMID: 38841510 PMCID: PMC11152925 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized and common in general surgery training programs. This study sought to better understand the factors that influence resident operative autonomy in robotic surgery. We hypothesized that resident seniority, surgeon work experience, surgeon robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) case volume, and procedure type influence general surgery residents' opportunities for autonomy in RAS as measured by percentage of resident individual console time (ICT). Methods General surgery resident ICT data for robotic cholecystectomy (RC), inguinal hernia (RIH), and ventral hernia (RVH) operations performed on the dual-console Da Vinci surgical robotic system between July 2019 and June 2021 were extracted. Cases with postgraduate year (PGY) 2-5 residents participating as a console surgeon were included. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was undertaken to explore the ICT results and we conducted secondary qualitative interviews with surgeons. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were applied. Results Resident ICT data from 420 robotic cases (IH 200, RC 121, and VH 99) performed by 20 junior residents (PGY2-3), 18 senior residents (PGY4-5), and 9 attending surgeons were extracted. The average ICT per case was 26.8 % for junior residents and 42.4 % for senior residents. Compared to early-career surgeons, surgeons with over 10 years' work experience gave less ICT to junior (18.2 % vs. 32.0 %) and senior residents (33.9 % vs. 56.6 %) respectively. Surgeons' RAS case volume had no correlation with resident ICT (r = 0.003, p = 0.0003). On average, residents had the most ICT in RC (45.8 %), followed by RIH (36.7 %) and RVH (28.6 %). Interviews with surgeons revealed two potential reasons for these resident ICT patterns: 1) Surgeon assessment of resident training year/experience influenced decisions to grant ICT; 2) Surgeons' perceived operative time pressure inversely affected resident ICT. Conclusions This study suggests resident ICT/autonomy in RC, RIH, and RVH are influenced by resident seniority level, surgeon work experience, and procedure type, but not related to surgeon RAS case volume. Design and implementation of an effective robotic training program must consider the external pressures at conflict with increased resident operative autonomy and seek to mitigate them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa N. Wang
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ingrid A. Woelfel
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Emily Huang
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Heidi Pieper
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Michael P. Meara
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tran E, Sun J, Gundara J. Systematic review of robotic ventral hernia repair with meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:37-46. [PMID: 38087977 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite being one of the most common operations performed by general surgeons, there is a lack of consensus regarding the recommended approach for ventral hernia repair (VHR). Recent times have seen the rapid development of new techniques, such as robotic ventral hernia repair (RVHR). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the currently available evidence relating to RVHR, in comparison to open VHR (OVHR) and laparoscopic VHR (LVHR). METHODS A systematic search of the following databases was conducted: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. A meta-analysis was performed for the outcomes of length of stay (LOS), recurrence, operative time, intraoperative complications, wound complications, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, mortality and costs. RESULTS A total of 39 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, RVHR reduced LOS, intra-operative complications, wound complications and readmission compared to OVHR. Compared to LVHR, RVHR was associated with increased operative time and costs, with comparable clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION There is currently a lack of robust evidence to support the robotic approach in VHR. It does not demonstrate major benefits in comparison to LVHR, which is more affordable and accessible. Strong quality, long-term data is required to help with establishing a gold standard approach in VHR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Tran
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jing Sun
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Justin Gundara
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
- Department of General Surgery, Logan Hospital, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia
- Department of General Surgery, Redland Hospital, Cleveland, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haywood N, Scott J, Zhang A, Hallowell P, Schirmer B. Characterization of the robotic surgery experience in minimally invasive surgery fellowships from 2010 to 2021. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9393-9398. [PMID: 37658200 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10402-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery has experienced exponential growth in the past decade. Few studies have evaluated the impact of robotics within minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship training programs. The purpose of our study was to examine and characterize recent trends in robotic surgery within MIS fellowship training programs. METHODS De-identified case log data from the Fellowship Council from 2010 to 2021 were evaluated. Percentage of operations performed with robot assistance over time was assessed and compared to the laparoscopic and open experience. Case logs were further stratified by operative category (e.g., bariatric, hernia, foregut), and robotic experience over time was evaluated for each category. Programs were stratified by percent robot use and the experience over time within each quartile was evaluated. RESULTS MIS fellowship training programs with a robotic platform increased from 45.1% (51/113) to 90.4% (123/136) over the study period. The percentage of robotic cases increased from 2.0% (1127/56,033) to 23.2% (16,139/69,496) while laparoscopic cases decreased from 80.2% (44,954/56,033) to 65.3% (45,356/69,496). Hernia and colorectal case categories had the largest increase in robot usage [hernia: 0.7% (62/8614) to 38.4% (4661/12,135); colorectal 4.2% (116/2747) to 31.8% (666/2094)]. When stratified by percentage of robot utilization, current (2020-2021) programs in the > 95th percentile performed 21.8% (3523/16,139) of robotic operations and programs in the > 50th percentile performed 90.0% (14,533/16,139) of all robotic cases. The median number of robotic cases performed per MIS fellow significantly increased from 2010 to 2021 [0 (0-6) to 72.5 (17.8-171.5), p < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS Robotic use in MIS fellowship training programs has grown substantially in the past decade, but the laparoscopic and open experience remains robust. There remains an imbalance with the top 50% of busiest robotic programs performing over 90% of robot trainee cases. The experience in MIS programs varies widely and trainees should examine program case logs closely to confirm parallel interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Haywood
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health, 1215 Lee St., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
| | - Joshua Scott
- Department of General Surgery, Sheridan Memorial Hospital, Sheridan, WY, USA
| | - Aimee Zhang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health, 1215 Lee St., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA
| | - Peter Hallowell
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health, 1215 Lee St., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA
| | - Bruce Schirmer
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health, 1215 Lee St., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roll S, Dias ERM. Education in Robotic Hernia Surgery-Current Situation. JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY : JAWS 2023; 2:12418. [PMID: 38312412 PMCID: PMC10831677 DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2023.12418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Roll
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Center of Abdominal Wall Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Santa Casa of São Paulo Hospital, School of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- The German Hospital Oswaldo Cruz Hernia Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meara M, Pieper H, Shields M, Woelfel I, Wang T, Renton D, Chen X. What influences general surgery residents' prospective entrustment and operative time in robotic inguinal hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7908-7913. [PMID: 37430122 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10242-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Teaching residents robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) is an increasingly common extension of contemporary surgical training. This study sought to investigate what variables would influence operative time (OT) and resident prospective entrustment in RIHR cases. METHODS We prospectively collected 68 resident RIHR operative performance evaluations with a validated instrument. Outpatient RIHR cases performed by 11 general surgery residents during 2020-2022 were included. The overall OT of matched cases was extracted from hospital billing; matched procedural step-specific OT was obtained from Intuitive Data Recorder (IDR). Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson correlation and one-way ANOVA. RESULTS The evaluation instrument reliably assessed residents' RIHR performance (Cronbach's α = 0.93); residents' prospective entrustment strongly correlated with overall guidance provided by attending surgeon (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001) and operative plan and judgment (r = 0.85, p < 0.0001). The overall OT was significantly associated with resident's team management (r = - 0.35, p = 0.011). Procedural step-specific OT was significantly associated with residents' step-specific skill (r = - 0.32, p = 0.014). On average, RIHR cases with the highest level of prospective entrustment (Resident can teach junior) showed the shortest step-specific OT. Entrustment level 3 (Reactive guidance needed) was the turning point of all four RIHR procedural step-specific OT. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that in RIHR, attending guidance, resident operative plan and judgment, and resident technical skill contribute to resident prospective entrustment; resident team management, technical skill, and attending guidance influence operative time, which in turn impacts attendings' determination of resident prospective entrustment. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed to further validate the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Meara
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Heidi Pieper
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Mallory Shields
- Research Division, Intuitive Surgical Inc, Norcross, GA, 30092, USA
| | - Ingrid Woelfel
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Theresa Wang
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - David Renton
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Xiaodong Chen
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clanahan JM, Yee A, Awad MM. Active control time: an objective performance metric for trainee participation in robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2117-2123. [PMID: 37237112 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01628-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Trainee participation and progression in robotic general surgery remain poorly defined. Computer-assisted technology offers the potential to provide and track objective performance metrics. In this study, we aimed to validate the use of a novel metric-active control time (ACT)-for assessing trainee participation in robotic-assisted cases. Performance data from da Vinci Surgical Systems was retrospectively analyzed for all robotic cases involving trainees with a single minimally invasive surgeon over 10 months. The primary outcome metric was percent ACT-the amount of trainee console time spent in active system manipulations over total active time from both consoles. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U statistical tests were applied in analyses. A total of 123 robotic cases with 18 general surgery residents and 1 fellow were included. Of these, 56 were categorized as complex. Median %ACT was statistically different between trainee levels for all case types taken in aggregate (PGY1s 3.0% [IQR 2-14%], PGY3s 32% [IQR 27-66%], PGY4s 42% [IQR 26-52%], PGY5s 50% [IQR 28-70%], and fellow 61% [IQR 41-85%], p = < 0.0001). When stratified by complexity, median %ACT was higher in standard versus complex cases for PGY5 (60% vs. 36%, p = 0.0002) and fellow groups (74% vs. 47%, p = 0.0045). In this study, we demonstrated an increase in %ACT with trainee level and with standard versus complex robotic cases. These findings are consistent with hypotheses, providing validity evidence for ACT as an objective measurement of trainee participation in robotic-assisted cases. Future studies will aim to define task-specific ACT to guide further robotic training and performance assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Clanahan
- Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Mailstop 8109-22-9905, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO, 63110-1093, USA.
| | - Andrew Yee
- Data and Analytics, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Peachtree Corners, GA, 30092, USA
| | - Michael M Awad
- Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Mailstop 8109-22-9905, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO, 63110-1093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yam C, DiMatteo A, Alnouri G, Sataloff RT. Otolaryngology resident familiarity with surgical instruments and preoperative setup: A pilot study. Am J Otolaryngol 2023; 44:103930. [PMID: 37229908 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was designed to determine otolaryngology (ORL) residents' ability to prepare the operating room independently for ORL surgical cases and their familiarity with ORL surgical instruments and related equipment. METHODS A 24-question, one-time, anonymous survey was distributed to otolaryngology-head and neck surgery program directors for distribution among their residents in the United States in November 2022. Residents in every post-graduate year were surveyed. Spearman's ranked correlation and Mann-Whitney U test were used. RESULTS The response rate among program directors was 9.5 % (11/116 programs), while the response rate among residents was 51.5 % (88/171 residents). A total of 88 survey responses were completed. 61 % of ORL residents who responded were able to name most instruments used in surgical cases. The most recognized surgical instruments by ORL residents were microdebrider (99 %) and alligator forceps (98 %); the least recognized were bellucci micro scissors (72 %) and pituitary forceps (52 %); and all instruments except the microdebrider showed significantly increased recognition with increasing post graduate training year (PGY), p ≤ 0.05. ORL residents were most able to set up independently the electrocautery (77 %) and laryngoscope suspension (73 %), while they were least able to set up the robot laser (6.8 %) and coblator (26 %) independently. All instruments showed significant positive correlations with increasing PGY; the strongest correlation was found in laryngoscope suspension, r = 0.74. 48 % of ORL residents reported that there were times when surgical techs and nurses were not available. Only 54 % of ORL residents reported being able to set up instruments when alone in the operating room, including 77.8 % of PGY-5 residents. Only 8 % of residents reported receiving education related to surgical instruments from their residency program, while 85 % thought that ORL residencies should have courses or educational materials about surgical instruments. CONCLUSION ORL residents' familiarity with surgical instruments and preoperative setup improved throughout their training. However, specific instruments had much lower recognition than others and a lower ability for independent setup. Nearly half of ORL residents reported being unable to set up surgical instruments in the absence of surgical staff. Implementation of surgical instrument education may improve these deficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Yam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Andrew DiMatteo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.
| | - Ghiath Alnouri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Robert T Sataloff
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Academic Specialties, Drexel University College of Medicine, United States of America; Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences Research, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yim NH, McCarter J, Haykal T, Aral AM, Yu JZ, Reece E, Winocour S. Robotic Surgery and Hospital Reimbursement. Semin Plast Surg 2023; 37:223-228. [PMID: 38444958 PMCID: PMC10911894 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
The field of plastic surgery remains at the forefront of technological and surgical innovation. However, the promising applications of robotics in plastic surgery must be thoughtfully balanced with hospital finances and reimbursements. Robotic systems have been studied extensively across multiple surgical disciplines and across diverse health care systems. The results show that there may be equal or better patient outcomes than alternatives. In an era where fiscal responsibility in health care is a top priority, thoughtful budgeting and spending must be considered and revisited frequently to attain sustainable organizational models that ensure appropriate use of robotic technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas H. Yim
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Jacob McCarter
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Tareck Haykal
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Ali M. Aral
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Jessie Z. Yu
- Department of Plastic Surgery at The University of Texas, MD Anderson, Houston, Texas
| | - Edward Reece
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sebastian Winocour
- Department of Plastic Surgery at The University of Texas, MD Anderson, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Singh A, Panse NS, Prasath V, Arjani S, Chokshi RJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic cholecystectomy in the treatment of benign gallbladder disease. Surgery 2023; 173:1323-1328. [PMID: 36914510 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard of care treatment for benign gallbladder disease. Robotic cholecystectomy is another approach for performing cholecystectomy that offers a surgeon better dexterity and visualization. However, robotic cholecystectomy may increase cost without sufficient evidence to suggest an improvement in clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to construct a decision tree model to compare cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and robotic cholecystectomy. METHODS Complication rates and effectiveness associated with robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy over a 1-year time frame were compared using a decision tree model populated with data from the published literature. Cost was calculated using Medicare data. Effectiveness was represented by quality-adjusted life-years. The primary outcome of the study was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which compares the cost per quality-adjusted life-year of the 2 interventions. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. Results were confirmed with 1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses varying branch-point probabilities. RESULTS The studies used in our analysis included 3,498 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 1,833 patients who underwent robotic cholecystectomy, and 392 patients who required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy produced 0.9722 quality-adjusted life-years, costing $9,370.06. Robotic cholecystectomy produced an additional 0.0017 quality-adjusted life-years at an additional $3,013.64. These results equate to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,795,735.21/quality-adjusted life-year. This exceeds the willingness-to-pay threshold, making laparoscopic cholecystectomy the more cost-effective strategy. Sensitivity analyses did not alter results. CONCLUSION Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the more cost-effective treatment modality for benign gallbladder disease. At present, robotic cholecystectomy is not able to improve clinical outcomes enough to justify its added cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adityabikram Singh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ. https://twitter.com/ad_singh09
| | - Neal S Panse
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ. https://twitter.com/NealPanse
| | - Vishnu Prasath
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ. https://twitter.com/Vishnu__Prasath
| | - Simran Arjani
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ. https://twitter.com/SimranArjani
| | - Ravi J Chokshi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Imai T, Amersi F, Tillou A, Chau V, Soukiasian H, Lin M. A Multi-Institutional Needs Assessment in the Development of a Robotic Surgery Curriculum: Perceptions From Resident and Faculty Surgeons. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2023; 80:93-101. [PMID: 36075804 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The growing adoption of robotic-assisted surgery mandates residents must acquire robotic skills. No standardized curriculum for robotic surgery exists. Therefore, programs have developed their own curricula, which are often unstructured and based on resource availability. With this strategy programs may not adhere to scholarly approaches in curriculum development. We aimed to obtain a multi-institutional needs assessment to address training needs and identify integral components of a formalized robotic surgery curriculum. METHODS A 10-question survey was distributed to general surgery residents. A separate 7-question survey was sent to robotic faculty surgeons at 3 institutions. Survey questions queried demographics, opinions regarding robotic training, proficiency definitions, and identification of procedures and instructional strategies for a curriculum. Mann- Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test were performed to compare responses amongst residents and faculty. Spearman's correlation was used to identify relationships between experience or post-graduate year (PGY) with response selection. RESULTS Both residents and faculty believed robotic training should start in the PGY1 (55.1% vs 52%; p = 0.58). Faculty recognized robotic training to be more important compared to residents (84% vs 58.1%; p < 0.05). Both groups considered a minimum of 21 to 40 robotic cases to be sufficient exposure during training (p = 0.30). Cholecystectomy (82.4% vs 72%; p = 0.261), ventral hernia repair (89.2% vs 88%; p = 1.0), inguinal hernia repair (91.9% vs 92%; p = 1.0), and right colectomy (83.8% vs 80%; p = 0.7) were considered to be the most appropriate robotic procedures during training. Both groups concurred that bedside (91.9% vs 100%; p = 0.33) and console skills training (97.3% vs 100%; p = 1.0), small group simulation (94.6% vs 72% p = 0.005), and independent practice (87.8% vs 92% p = 0.73), were instructional strategies vital to a curriculum. Faculty considered online didactic modules (96% vs 59.5%; p < 0.05) to be more important, whereas residents favored small group experiences for fundamental skills (94.6% vs. 72%; p < 0.05) and procedure-based simulation (96% vs 64%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our targeted needs assessment identified requisite components of a robotics curriculum, which are feasible and accepted by both residents and faculty. Medical educators can use this as a resource to develop a formal robotics training curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taryne Imai
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Health Care System, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Farin Amersi
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Health Care System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Areti Tillou
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Van Chau
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Health Care System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Harmik Soukiasian
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Health Care System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew Lin
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hansen DL, Christophersen C, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J. Implementation of robot-assisted groin hernia repair diminishes the prospects of young surgeons' training: a nationwide register-based cohort study. Hernia 2022; 26:1653-1658. [PMID: 36201067 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02691-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is becoming more popular in recent years but may remove operations from surgical trainees. We aimed to investigate the educational level of the surgeons who performed robot-assisted groin hernia repair and the rate of supervision and compare this to open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair. METHODS This register-based study was reported according to the RECORD statement and used linked data from the Danish Hernia Database and the Danish Patient Safety Authority's Online Register. We included surgeons that performed robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and/or open groin hernia repairs performed between January 1, 2015, and June 15, 2021 in Denmark. RESULTS A total of 916 surgeons performing 43,856 groin hernia repairs were included in this study. Surgical specialists performed 98% of the robot-assisted groin hernia repairs, 89% of the laparoscopic repairs (p < 0.0001), and 54% of the Lichtenstein repairs (p < 0.0001). Only 5% of the robot-assisted groin hernia repairs were supervised compared with 11% of the laparoscopic repairs (p < 0.0001) and 28% of the open repairs (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Almost all groin hernia repairs performed with the robot-assisted technique were performed by surgeons specialized in general surgery. The proportions of surgeons specialized in surgery were higher for robot-assisted operations compared with laparoscopic or open groin hernia surgery. Thus, our data suggest a lack of involvement of surgeons in training, and this diminishes the educational potential in the pool of groin hernia operations by the use of robot-assisted repairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Hansen
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - C Christophersen
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - S Fonnes
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - J Rosenberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nwaelugo NS, Goldblatt MI, Gould JC, Higgins RM. The evolution of the general surgery resident operative case experience in the era of robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6679-6687. [PMID: 34981239 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08940-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted general surgery procedures are becoming commonplace, requiring more residency programs to establish training curricula for residents. Concerns exist regarding the impact this will have on surgical residents' operative case distribution in laparoscopic and open surgery. This study aimed to analyze the impact of a growing robotic operative case volume and established robotic surgery training curriculum on the general surgery resident operative experience. METHODS The robotic surgery training curriculum at the Medical College of Wisconsin was established in 2017. ACGME operative case logs of residents from 2014 to 2020 were analyzed to determine resident participation in open, laparoscopic, and robotic cases. Case categories included alimentary tract, abdomen, endocrine, thoracic, pediatric, and trauma. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze overall cases, as well as participation by case type, post-graduate year (PGY) level, resident role, and institution type. Statistical significance was defined as a p value < 0.05. RESULTS Operative case logs from 77 residents were analyzed with a total of 34,757 cases: 59.3% open, 39.6% laparoscopic, and 1.1% robotic. There was no significant change in open or laparoscopic case volumes. However, there was a 3.4% increase in robotic cases, from 2014 to 2020 (p = 0.01), specifically in foregut (4.0%, p = 0.01), intestinal (1.6%, p = 0.03), and hernia (8.3%, p = 0.003) procedures. Academic (2.8%, p = 0.01) and veterans' hospital (2.0%, p = 0.01) institutions saw a significant increase in their residents' robotic cases. The only resident role with a significant increase in robotic cases was first assistant (8.0%, p = 0.004). There was no significant difference across PGY levels by surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights that the growth of robotic cases has not had a detrimental effect on the resident experience with open and laparoscopic cases. As robotic cases continually increase, the impact on laparoscopic and open case volumes must be monitored to ensure a well-balanced training experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nnenna S Nwaelugo
- Division of Minimally Invasive and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Matthew I Goldblatt
- Division of Minimally Invasive and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Jon C Gould
- Division of Minimally Invasive and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Rana M Higgins
- Division of Minimally Invasive and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Munshower E, Ren E, Bauerle WB, Ruland J, Stoltzfus J, McDonald M, Baillie DR, Chaar ME. Cost analysis of robotic assisted general surgery cases in a single academic institution. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:557-564. [PMID: 35939166 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01434-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopy is currently the standard approach for minimally invasive general surgery procedures. However, robotic surgery is now increasingly being used in general surgery. Robotic surgery provides several advantages such as 3D-visualization, articulated instruments, improved ergonomics, and increased dexterity, but is also associated with an increased overall cost which limits its widespread use. In our institution, the robotic assisted approach is frequently used for the performance of general surgery cases including inguinal hernias, cholecystectomies and paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in cost between a robotic and laparoscopic approach for the above-mentioned cases. With IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective cost analysis of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs, cholecystectomies and PEH repairs between June 2018 and November 2020. Patients who had a concomitant procedure, a revisional surgery, or bilateral inguinal hernia repair were excluded from the study. Cost analysis was performed using a micro-costing approach. Statistical significance was denoted by p < 0.05. There were no differences among the different groups in relation to age, gender, ethnicity, and BMI. The overall cost of the robotic (R-) approach compared to a laparoscopic (L-) approach was significantly lower for cholecystectomy ($3,199.96 vs $4019.89, p < 0.05). For inguinal hernia repairs and PEH repairs without mesh, we found no significant difference in overall costs between the R- and L- approach (R- $3835.06 vs L- $3783.50, p = 0.69) and (R- $6852.41 vs L- $6819.69, p = 0.97), respectively. However, the overall cost of PEH with mesh was significantly higher for the R- group compared to the L- group (R- $7,511.09 vs L- $6,443.32, p < 0.05). Based on our institutional cost data, use of a robotic approach when performing certain general surgery cases does not seem to be cost prohibitive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Munshower
- Temple/St. Luke's School of Medicine, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Emily Ren
- Temple/St. Luke's School of Medicine, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Wayne B Bauerle
- Department of Research and Innovation, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Janice Ruland
- Cost Accounting Department, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Jill Stoltzfus
- Department of Research and Innovation, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Marian McDonald
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, St. Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - Daniel R Baillie
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, St. Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - Maher El Chaar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Bariatric Surgery, St. Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hansen DL, Gram-Hanssen A, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J. Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:291-301. [PMID: 35788971 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01440-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Surgical residents routinely participate in open and laparoscopic groin hernia repairs. The increasing popularity of robot-assisted groin hernia repair could lead to an educational loss for residents. We aimed to explore the involvement of surgical specialists and surgical residents, i.e., non-specialists, in robot-assisted groin hernia repair. The scoping review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guideline. A protocol was uploaded at Open Science Framework, and a systematic search was conducted in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Included studies had to report on robot-assisted groin hernia repairs. Data charting was conducted in duplicate. Of the 67 included studies, 85% of the studies described that the robot-assisted groin hernia repair was performed by a surgical specialist. The rest of the studies had no description of the primary operating surgeon. Only 13% of the included studies reported that a resident attended the robot-assisted groin hernia repair. Thus, robot-assisted groin hernia repair was mainly performed by surgical specialists, and robot-assisted groin hernia repair therefore seems to be underutilized to educate surgical residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danni Lip Hansen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Anders Gram-Hanssen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Siv Fonnes
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kokko MA, Van Citters DW, Seigne JD, Halter RJ. A particle filter approach to dynamic kidney pose estimation in robotic surgical exposure. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2022; 17:1079-1089. [PMID: 35511394 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02638-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Traditional soft tissue registration methods require direct intraoperative visualization of a significant portion of the target anatomy in order to produce acceptable surface alignment. Image guidance is therefore generally not available during the robotic exposure of structures like the kidneys which are not immediately visualized upon entry into the abdomen. This paper proposes guiding surgical exposure with an iterative state estimator that assimilates small visual cues into an a priori anatomical model as exposure progresses, thereby evolving pose estimates for the occluded structures of interest. METHODS Intraoperative surface observations of a right kidney are simulated using endoscope tracking and preoperative tomography from a representative robotic partial nephrectomy case. Clinically relevant random perturbations of the true kidney pose are corrected using this sequence of observations in a particle filter framework to estimate an optimal similarity transform for fitting a patient-specific kidney model at each step. The temporal response of registration error is compared against that of serial rigid coherent point drift (CPD) in both static and simulated dynamic surgical fields, and for varying levels of observation persistence. RESULTS In the static case, both particle filtering and persistent CPD achieved sub-5 mm accuracy, with CPD processing observations 75% faster. Particle filtering outperformed CPD in the dynamic case under equivalent computation times due to the former requiring only minimal persistence. CONCLUSION This proof-of-concept simulation study suggests that Bayesian state estimation may provide a viable pathway to image guidance for surgical exposure in the abdomen, especially in the presence of dynamic intraoperative tissue displacement and deformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Kokko
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, 15 Thayer Drive, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
| | - Douglas W Van Citters
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, 15 Thayer Drive, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - John D Seigne
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Section of Urology, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.,Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Ryan J Halter
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, 15 Thayer Drive, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.,Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Learning curve of robotic inguinal hernia repair in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon: a comparative study. J Robot Surg 2022; 16:1307-1312. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01362-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
17
|
Hansen DL, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J. Spin is present in the majority of articles evaluating robot-assisted groin hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:2271-2278. [PMID: 35024934 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08990-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of scientific articles published each year is increasing, resulting in greater competition to get work published. Spin is defined as specific reporting strategies used to distort the readers' interpretation of results so that they are viewed more favorable. However, prevalence of spin in studies comparing robot-assisted groin hernia repair with traditional methods is unknown. OBJECTIVES/AIM To determine the frequency and extent of spin in studies assessing robot-assisted groin hernia repair. METHODS This systematic review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines, and a protocol was registered at PROSPERO before data extraction. Database search included PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. RESULTS Of 35 included studies, spin was present in 57%. Within these, 95% had spin present in the abstract and 80% in the conclusion of the article. There was no association between study size and spin (p > 0.05). However, presence of spin in studies positively minded towards robot-assisted hernia repair was higher (p < 0.001) compared with those against or being neutral in their view of the procedure. Furthermore, being funded by or receiving grants from Intuitive Surgical were associated with a higher prevalence of spin (p < 0.05) compared with those who were not. CONCLUSION Spin was found to be common in articles reporting on robot-assisted groin hernia repair, and presence of spin was higher in studies funded by or receiving grants from the robot company. This suggests that readers should be cautious when reading similar literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danni Lip Hansen
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Siv Fonnes
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pennington Z, Judy BF, Zakaria HM, Lakomkin N, Mikula AL, Elder BD, Theodore N. Learning curves in robot-assisted spine surgery: a systematic review and proposal of application to residency curricula. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52:E3. [PMID: 34973673 DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.focus21496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Spine robots have seen increased utilization over the past half decade with the introduction of multiple new systems. Market research expects this expansion to continue over the next half decade at an annual rate of 20%. However, because of the novelty of these devices, there is limited literature on their learning curves and how they should be integrated into residency curricula. With the present review, the authors aimed to address these two points. METHODS A systematic review of the published English-language literature on PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies describing the learning curve in spine robotics. Included articles described clinical results in patients using one of the following endpoints: operative time, screw placement time, fluoroscopy usage, and instrumentation accuracy. Systems examined included the Mazor series, the ExcelsiusGPS, and the TiRobot. Learning curves were reported in a qualitative synthesis, given as the mean improvement in the endpoint per case performed or screw placed where possible. All studies were level IV case series with a high risk of reporting bias. RESULTS Of 1579 unique articles, 97 underwent full-text review and 21 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria; 62 articles were excluded for not presenting primary data for one of the above-described endpoints. Of the 21 articles, 18 noted the presence of a learning curve in spine robots, which ranged from 3 to 30 cases or 15 to 62 screws. Only 12 articles performed regressions of one of the endpoints (most commonly operative time) as a function of screws placed or cases performed. Among these, increasing experience was associated with a 0.24- to 4.6-minute decrease in operative time per case performed. All but one series described the experience of attending surgeons, not residents. CONCLUSIONS Most studies of learning curves with spine robots have found them to be present, with the most common threshold being 20 to 30 cases performed. Unfortunately, all available evidence is level IV data, limited to case series. Given the ability of residency to allow trainees to safely perform these cases under the supervision of experienced senior surgeons, it is argued that a curriculum should be developed for senior-level residents specializing in spine comprising a minimum of 30 performed cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Brendan F Judy
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| | - Hesham M Zakaria
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, California
| | - Nikita Lakomkin
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Nicholas Theodore
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
S Schmiederer I, Torices-Dardon A, M Ferrari-Light D, Charbel Abboud E, Villani V, N Lau J, M Foglia C. Developing a Robotic General Surgery Training Curriculum: Identifying Key Elements Through a Delphi Process. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2021; 78:e129-e136. [PMID: 34456170 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A national robotic surgery curriculum is still developing for general surgery residents as robotic surgery becomes increasingly accessible. One general surgery residency program utilized a Delphi process to optimize a robotic surgery curriculum and to determine key factors that might affect robotic proficiency and intraoperative independence. DESIGN Delphi methodology was used to gain consensus amongst robotic surgery faculty and trainees. Consensus was defined as agreement of 66.7% or above in factors that would allow a resident to independently operate in a robotic case. A panel of diverse representatives proposed factors that might affect resident robotic learning and operative experience. In a subsequent round, questions were sent through an anonymous online survey for respondents to identify factors that affect resident robotic independence. Respondents were also given the ability to write in pertinent factors. SETTING This study was conducted from July 2020 to September 2020 via anonymous web-based questionnaires for education researchers, faculty members, and residents of a university-affiliated independent general surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS The initial panel consisted of a robotic surgeon, a 2020 graduate, a 2019 graduate and/or robotic fellow, a research resident, and a current resident. The subsequent survey was completed by 8 faculty members, 6 recent graduates, and 15 current residents within the general surgery residency program. RESULTS Proposed items fell into 3 categories: institutional resources, individual qualities, and curricular elements. Consensus within groups was achieved in the following items: dual robotic console models, robotic-focused faculty, resident interest, PGY level, and resident time spent on a simulator. CONCLUSIONS This Delphi exercise has informed this general surgery residency program in the development of a robotic surgery curriculum, through contribution from multiple stakeholders. While curricular elements for baseline robotic knowledge are necessary, institutional resources, deliberate practice, resident entrustment and faculty teaching proficiency warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid S Schmiederer
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
| | | | | | - Elia Charbel Abboud
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Vincenzo Villani
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James N Lau
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hague CM, Merrill SB. Integration of Robotics in Urology Residency Programs: an Unchecked Technological Revolution. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:47. [PMID: 34532784 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01062-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the integration of robotics in urology residency programs and evaluate how it has impacted a graduates' level of surgical competence. RECENT FINDINGS Surgical technique training has shown a dramatic shift towards robotics with the most profound occurring in oncology. However, integration of robotics is not uniform across programs nor even among residents themselves. Robotics require graduates to garner a broader skill set within the same prescribed training time. Unfortunately, in this modern era, graduates are feeling more ill-equipped to start independent practice and show an increased need to pursue fellowship training to achieve technical proficiency. The dissemination of robotics in residency programs has gone unchecked. Modulating existing training structures through (1) development of procedure- and surgical technique-specific target metrics for graduation and (2) integration of a formalized robotic curriculum may improve the overall quality and outcome of the educational experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian M Hague
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Suzanne B Merrill
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cadieux DC, Mishra A, Goldszmidt MA. Before the scalpel: Exploring surgical residents' preoperative preparatory strategies. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 55:733-740. [PMID: 33423328 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to increase understanding of preoperative preparatory strategies utilised by senior surgical residents and identify how social and material forces come together to shape practice. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND DATA Preoperative preparation can play a powerful role in operative learning. Residents rarely receive guidance, feedback, or explicit expectations on how to prepare for the OR. Understanding current practice and how to support preoperative preparation represents an important gap in our efforts to improve surgical training. METHODS Constructivist grounded theory with sensitizing concepts from sociomateriality guided data collection and analysis. Fifteen senior surgical residents from a range of surgical disciplines were purposefully sampled and participated in an in-depth individual interview. Two return-of-finding focus groups followed with seven residents. Rigor was enhanced through constant comparison, theoretical sampling, pursuit of discrepant data, and investigator triangulation. RESULTS Residents utilised a range of strategies addressing four areas of focus: develop technical skills, improve procedural knowledge, enhance patient-specificity, and know surgical preferences. However, residents also described receiving limited guidance on what it means to 'be prepared' and experience significant challenges in achieving preparedness. A mix of social and material things that enabled or constrained preparatory efforts influenced individual strategies. These included rotation structure, relationships, the OR list, and time. CONCLUSIONS Our findings offer possible solutions by elaborating on preparatory variability and considerations for residents, faculty, and programs to improve practice. As a first step, we suggest programs begin to engage in explicit dialogue and reflection with their residents, faculty, and residency program committees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle C Cadieux
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Centre for Education Research and Innovation, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Anuradha Mishra
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Mark A Goldszmidt
- Centre for Education Research and Innovation, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gressel GM, George K, Woodland MB, Banks E. Residents' Confidence in Performing Robotic Hysterectomy in Obstetrics and Gynecologic Training Programs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28:1882-1888.e5. [PMID: 33962023 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare residents' perceptions of readiness to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the perceptions of residency program directors in obstetrics and gynecology programs throughout the United States. DESIGN A survey was administered to all residents taking the 2019 Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology Exam and concurrently to program directors in all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs. SETTING The survey was designed to assess resident confidence to perform robotic hysterectomies by the time of graduation. PATIENTS No patients were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS The only intervention was administration of the survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS De-identified survey data were analyzed using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. A total of 5473 resident respondents and 241 residency program directors were included in the study. Fifty-two percent of graduating residents reported that they felt they were given surgical autonomy to perform robotic hysterectomies, and 53.7% reported that they could perform one independently (if it was an "emergency" and they had to). By the time of graduation, only 59% of residents reported confidence performing a robotic hysterectomy, and only 56% reported they felt that it would be an important procedure for their future career. Program directors were significantly more likely to report that their residents were given autonomy to perform robotic hysterectomy by graduation (61.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 54.3-67.3]), could perform a robotic hysterectomy independently (60.9% [95% CI, 53.9-67.6]), or could perform a robotic hysterectomy by graduation (70.2% [95% CI, 63.5-76.3]) than residents themselves (38.6% [95% CI, 37.2-40.0], 22.8% [95% CI, 21.6-24.0], 62.6% [95% CI, 61.2-64.0], respectively). CONCLUSION At the time of graduation, residents' confidence in performing robotic hysterectomy independently is lower than their confidence in performing all other approaches to hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory M Gressel
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Drs. Gressel and Banks)
| | - Karen George
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia (Dr. George)
| | - Mark B Woodland
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Reading Hospital/Tower Health, Drexel University College of Medicine, Reading, Pennsylvania (Dr. Woodland)
| | - Erika Banks
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Drs. Gressel and Banks).
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Khalafallah YM, Bernaiche T, Ranson S, Liu C, Collins DT, Dort J, Hafner G. Residents' Views on the Impact of Robotic Surgery on General Surgery Education. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2021; 78:1007-1012. [PMID: 33093001 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of the da Vinci Robot has been fast growing in general surgery in the United States over the past decade. While the financial cost of robot-assisted procedures has been studied, there has been limited research on the educational cost of the robotic approach on general surgery trainees, and their surgical skills. DESIGN Analysis of anonymous educational survey responses collected from residents, in addition to case logs which were used as a retrospective review for the 5 years preceding the survey. SETTING One thousand bed, tertiary care hospital general surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-four enrolled general surgery residents in 2018. RESULTS There has been a rapid expansion in the use of robotics in general surgery. In 2017 the total number of general surgery cases using the da Vinci robot increased 6 fold over that in 2013 (23 cases in 2013, 136 in 2017), while both open and laparoscopic procedures have witnessed about a 33% drop in the case volume during those years. Almost all residents would prefer a residency program which offers the da Vinci robot for care and training (95%), however, 38% of general surgery residents reported that the presence of robotic-assisted surgery had a "detrimental" effect on their surgical training. Senior residents were more likely to report a "detrimental" effect (56% vs 27%). A third of the residents believe that robotic surgery is impeding their ability to learn open and laparoscopic surgical techniques, and only 25% denied a negative impact. Senior residents are more likely to report this negative impact (67% vs 13%). CONCLUSIONS Reforms in residency curricula need to be in place to accommodate the expansion of the use of the robotic platform in general surgery. A subjective survey of the residents suggests that robotic surgery can potentially impede the development of residents' open and laparoscopic surgical skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef M Khalafallah
- Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Tyler Bernaiche
- Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Stacy Ranson
- Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Chang Liu
- Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Devon T Collins
- George Mason University, Department of Global and Community Health, Fairfax, Virginia; Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Jonathan Dort
- Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Gordon Hafner
- Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Falls Church, Virginia; Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Falls Church, Viriginia.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Learning Curve in Robotic Primary Ventral Hernia Repair Using Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh: A Cumulative Sum Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 31:346-355. [PMID: 33229931 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curves (LCs) are useful to analyze individual performance and to evaluate the acquisition of new skills and the evolution of those skills as experience is accumulated. The purpose of this study is to present a CUSUM LC based on the operative times of robotic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (rIPOM) ventral hernia repair (VHR) and identify differences observed throughout its phases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent rIPOM repair for elective, midline, and primary hernias were included. All procedures were performed exclusively by one surgeon within a 5-year period. CUSUM and risk-adjusted CUSUM were used to visualize the LC of rIPOM-VHR, based on operative times and complications. Once groups were obtained, univariate comparisons were performed. RESULTS Of the 90 rIPOM repairs, 25, 40, and 25 patients were allocated using a CUSUM analysis to the early, middle, and late phases, respectively. In terms of skin-to-skin times, the middle phase has a mean duration of 23 minutes shorter than the early phase (P<0.001), and the late phase has a mean duration 34 minutes shorter than the early phase (P<0.001). A steep decrease in off-console time was observed, with a 10-minute difference from early to middle phases. A consistent and gradual decrease in operative times was observed after completion of 36 cases, and a risk-adjusted CUSUM revealed improving outcomes after 55 cases. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates and elucidates interval improvement in operative efficiency in rIPOM-VHR. Consistently decreasing operative times and simultaneous accumulated complication rates were observed after the completion of 55 cases.
Collapse
|
25
|
Eid JJ, Jyot A, Macedo FI, Sabir M, Mittal VK. Robotic Cholecystectomy Is a Safe Educational Alternative to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy During General Surgical Training: A Pilot Study. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2020; 77:1266-1270. [PMID: 32217123 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Revised: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of robotic surgery in general surgery (GS) continues to expand. Several programs have integrated robotic-based simulators and models into surgical education; however, residents' robotic experience in the operating room is currently limited. We sought to assess the safety and feasibility of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) when independently performed by GS chief residents. METHODS From June 2016 to October 2018, RC and laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) performed independently by chief residents on a resident staff surgical service were prospectively included. Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative complications were analyzed and compared between both cohorts. RESULTS A total of 20 RC and 70 LC were included. Patient characteristics, indications for surgery, and comorbidities were similar in both groups. RC was more likely to be performed electively (95% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.001). No difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative bile duct injury, or conversion to open was observed. Patients undergoing LC had an overall longer mean length of hospital stay (2.7 days ± 2.1 vs. 0.8 days ± 0.4, p < 0.001); however, length of hospital stay was similar between RC and LC performed electively (p = 0.946). No difference in postoperative complications and 30-day readmission was observed. CONCLUSIONS RC can be safely and independently performed by GS residents with similar outcomes as LC. Efforts should be directed toward creating a platform to bridge competent simulator skills into safe performance in the operating suite. The integration of robotic training into the core GS curriculum should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Eid
- Department of Surgery, Ascension Providence Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine-Southeast Campus, Southfield, Michigan.
| | - Apram Jyot
- Department of Surgery, Ascension Providence Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine-Southeast Campus, Southfield, Michigan
| | - Francisco Igor Macedo
- Department of Surgery, Ascension Providence Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine-Southeast Campus, Southfield, Michigan
| | - Mubashir Sabir
- Department of Surgery, Ascension Providence Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine-Southeast Campus, Southfield, Michigan
| | - Vijay K Mittal
- Department of Surgery, Ascension Providence Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine-Southeast Campus, Southfield, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhao B, Lam J, Hollandsworth HM, Lee AM, Lopez NE, Abbadessa B, Eisenstein S, Cosman BC, Ramamoorthy SL, Parry LA. General surgery training in the era of robotic surgery: a qualitative analysis of perceptions from resident and attending surgeons. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:1712-1721. [PMID: 31286248 PMCID: PMC6946889 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06954-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of the surgical robot has increased annually since its introduction, especially in general surgery. Despite the tremendous increase in utilization, there are currently no validated curricula to train residents in robotic surgery, and the effects of robotic surgery on general surgery residency training are not well defined. In this study, we aim to explore the perceptions of resident and attending surgeons toward robotic surgery education in general surgery residency training. METHODS We performed a qualitative thematic analysis of in-person, one-on-one, semi-structured interviews with general surgery residents and attending surgeons at a large academic health system. Convenient and purposeful sampling was performed in order to ensure diverse demographics, experiences, and opinions were represented. Data were analyzed continuously, and interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached, which occurred after 20 residents and seven attendings. RESULTS All interviewees agreed that dual consoles are necessary to maximize the teaching potential of the robotic platform, and the importance of simulation and simulators in robotic surgery education is paramount. However, further work to ensure proper access to simulation resources for residents is necessary. While most recognize that bedside-assist skills are essential, most think its educational value plateaus quickly. Lastly, residents believe that earlier exposure to robotic surgery is necessary and that almost every case has a portion that is level-appropriate for residents to perform on the robot. CONCLUSIONS As robotic surgery transitions from novelty to ubiquity, the importance of effective general surgery robotic surgery training during residency is paramount. Through in-depth interviews, this study provides examples of effective educational tools and techniques, highlights the importance of simulation, and explores opinions regarding the role of the resident in robotic surgery education. We hope the insights gained from this study can be used to develop and/or refine robotic surgery curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beiqun Zhao
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
| | - Jenny Lam
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Hannah M Hollandsworth
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Arielle M Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Nicole E Lopez
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Benjamin Abbadessa
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Samuel Eisenstein
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Bard C Cosman
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Sonia L Ramamoorthy
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Lisa A Parry
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, Mail Code 7220, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhao B, Hollandsworth HM, Lee AM, Lam J, Lopez NE, Abbadessa B, Eisenstein S, Cosman BC, Ramamoorthy SL, Parry LA. Making the Jump: A Qualitative Analysis on the Transition From Bedside Assistant to Console Surgeon in Robotic Surgery Training. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2020; 77:461-471. [PMID: 31558428 PMCID: PMC7036000 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2019] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine barriers associated with the transition from bedside assistant to console surgeon for general surgery residents in the era of robotic surgery in general surgery training. DESIGN Qualitative thematic analysis using one-on-one interviews of general surgery residents and attendings conducted between June 2018 and February 2019. SETTING An urban, academic, multihospital general surgery residency program with a robust robotic surgery program. PARTICIPANTS Convenient and purposeful sampling was performed to ensure a variety of resident graduate-years and attending subspecialties were represented. Sample size was determined by data saturation, which occurred after 20 resident and 7 attending interviews. RESULTS Residents identified the low volume of general surgery robotic cases, the infrequency of exposure to robotic surgery, and attending comfort with robotic surgery (and with teaching on the robot) as potential barriers in the transition from bedside assistant to console surgeon. Residents had to find a replacement bedside assistant in order to be the console surgeon, which was challenging. In addition, residents felt that the current culture surrounding robotic surgery is very hierarchal, limiting their exposure. Attendings' trust in the residents' console skills was a major determining factor in allowing residents on the console. CONCLUSIONS Most robotic surgery education curricula are sequential, requiring the resident to progress from bedside assistant to console surgeon. Unfortunately, there are many potential barriers for residents in the transition from bedside assistant to console surgeon. Some barriers apply to general surgery training overall, but are amplified in robotic surgery, while others are unique to robotic surgery education. Recognition of, and rectifying, these barriers may increase resident participation as the console surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beiqun Zhao
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| | | | - Arielle M Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Jenny Lam
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Nicole E Lopez
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Benjamin Abbadessa
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Samuel Eisenstein
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Bard C Cosman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Surgery, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, California
| | - Sonia L Ramamoorthy
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Lisa A Parry
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Surgery, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Resident training experience with robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 2020; 219:278-282. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
29
|
Teaching in the robotic environment: Use of alternative approaches to guide operative instruction. Am J Surg 2020; 219:191-196. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
30
|
Green CA, Mahuron KM, Harris HW, O'Sullivan PS. Integrating Robotic Technology Into Resident Training: Challenges and Recommendations From the Front Lines. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2019; 94:1532-1538. [PMID: 30998574 PMCID: PMC6768698 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop recommendations for improving the integration of robotic technology into today's apprentice-based resident training. METHOD During a national meeting in 2017, 24 robotic surgeons were interviewed about their experiences integrating robotic technology into resident training. Qualitative thematic analysis of interview notes and recordings revealed themes related to challenges and recommendations. RESULTS Four themes emerged, each corresponding to a general recommendation for integrating robotic technology into training. The first, surgical techniques versus tools, contrasts faculty's sequential mastery-surgical techniques first, then the robotic tool-with residents' simultaneous learning. The recommendation is to create separate learning opportunities for focused skill acquisition. The second theme, timing of exposure to the robotic tool, describes trainees' initial focus on tool use for basic surgical steps. The recommendation is to increase access to basic robotic cases. The third theme covers the relationship of laparoscopic and robotic surgery. The recommendation is to emphasize similar and dissimilar features during all minimally invasive surgical cases. The fourth theme, use of the dual console (which enables two consoles to operate the robot, the primary determines the secondary's functionality), highlights the unique teaching opportunities this console creates. The recommendation is for surgeons to give verbal guidance so residents completely understand surgical techniques. CONCLUSIONS Surgical educators should consider technique versus tool, timing of exposure to the tool, overlapping and varying features of robotic and laparoscopic surgery, and use of the dual console as they develop curricula to ensure thorough acquisition and synthesis of all elements of robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney A Green
- C.A. Green is a general surgery resident, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. K.M. Mahuron is a general surgery resident, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. H.W. Harris is professor and chief, Division of General Surgery, J. Engelbert Dunphy Endowed Chair in Surgery, and program director, National Institutes of Health T32 Training Program in Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. P.S. O'Sullivan is professor, Departments of Medicine and Surgery, and director of research and development in medical education, Center for Faculty Educators, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine. She is also endowed chair of surgical education, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Microanalysis of video from a robotic surgical procedure: implications for observational learning in the robotic environment. J Robot Surg 2018; 13:449-454. [PMID: 30173348 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0866-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/25/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Without haptic feedback, robotic surgeons rely on visual processing to interpret the operative field. To provide guidance for teaching in this environment, we analyzed intracorporeal actions and behaviors of a robotic surgeon. Six hours of video were captured by the intracorporeal camera during a robot-assisted lower anterior resection. After complete review, authors reduced the video to a consecutive 35 min of highly focused robotic activity and finally, a 2-min clip was subjected to microanalysis. The clip was replayed multiple times (capturing 1, 2, 10, 60 and 120 s intervals) and activities were identified, such as right and left hand motion, tissue handling and camera adjustments recorded using a software program. Activity patterns were categorized into two main themes: change in operative focus occurs when there is an inability to obtain adequate tension, and observation of robot-assisted surgery is based on an incomplete visual framework. The surgeon manipulated tissue predominantly using blunt adjustments and rarely grasped it, likely as a way to avoid tissue trauma. A magnified operative field required precise dissection, which occurs robotically with movement of a single instrument against a static field (motionless second robotic arm). This meticulous technique is unlike the bimodal manipulation often used for laparoscopic dissection. Since residents have limited active participation in robotic cases, and therefore, rely heavily on the captured image for skill acquisition, we recommend surgeons to use focus shifts as an opportunity to describe their operative decision-making and highlight instrument manipulations specific to operating with robotic technology.
Collapse
|
33
|
Low confidence levels with the robotic platform among senior surgical residents: simulation training is needed. J Robot Surg 2018; 13:155-158. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0853-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
34
|
Tam V, Borrebach J, Dunn SA, Bellon J, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME. Proficiency-based training and credentialing can improve patient outcomes and decrease cost to a hospital system. Am J Surg 2018; 217:591-596. [PMID: 30098709 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 07/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While proficiency-based robotic training has been shown to enhance skill acquisition, no studies have shown that training leads to improved outcomes or quality measures. METHODS Board-certified general surgeons participated in an optional proficiency-based robotic training curriculum and outcomes from robotic hernia cases were analyzed. Multivariable analysis was performed for operative times to adjust for patient and surgical variables. RESULTS Six out of 16 (38%) surgeons completed training and 210 robotic hernia cases were analyzed. Longer operative times were associated with bilateral repairs (observed-to-expected operative time ratio [OTR] = 1.41, p < 0.001) and incarceration (OTR = 1.24, p = 0.006), while female patients (OTR = 0.87, p = 0.001) and increasing chronologic case order (OTR = 0.94, p < 0.001) were associated with shorter operative times. Surgeons who completed robotic training achieved shorter OTRs than those who did not (p = 0.03). Comparing non-risk adjusted hospital costs, trainees had an average of $1207 in savings (20% reduction) per robotic hernia case. CONCLUSIONS A structured proficiency-based robotics training curriculum is an effective way to reduce operative times and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vernissia Tam
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Jeffrey Borrebach
- Wolff Center at UPMC, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | | | - Johanna Bellon
- Wolff Center at UPMC, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mark Knab L, Zenati MS, Khodakov A, Rice M, Al-Abbas A, Bartlett DL, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME. Evolution of a Novel Robotic Training Curriculum in a Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3445-3452. [PMID: 30073601 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6686-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery is increasingly being used for complex oncologic operations, although currently there is no standardized curriculum in place for surgical oncologists. We describe the evolution of a proficiency-based robotic training program implemented for surgical oncology fellows, and demonstrate the outcomes of the program. METHODS A 5-step robotic curriculum began integration in July 2013. Fellows from July 2013 to August 2017 were included. An education portfolio was created for each fellow, including pre-fellowship experience, fellowship experience with data from robotic curriculum and operative experience, and post-fellowship practice information. RESULTS Of 30 fellows, 20% completed a prior fellowship, 97% trained at an academic residency, 57% had prior robotic training (median 5 h), and 43% had performed robotic surgery (median 0 cases). In fellowship, on average, fellows spent 5 h on the virtual reality curriculum and performed 19 biotissue anastomoses. For total surgeries, fellows operating from the console increased over time (p = 0.005). For pancreas, the average percentage of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) steps completed increased (p < 0.011), as did the number of PDs in which the fellow completed the entire resection (p = 0.013). Fellows were 10 times more likely to complete the entire distal than PD from the console (p < 0.01). Post-fellowship, 83% of fellows obtained an academic position, 88% utilized robotics, and 91% performed pancreatic surgery. CONCLUSIONS With dedicated training, fellows can safely primarily perform complex gastrointestinal robotic surgeries and, after graduation, take jobs incorporating this skill set. In this era of scrutiny on cost and outcomes, specialized training programs offer a safe integration option for complex technical skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Mark Knab
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mazen S Zenati
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anton Khodakov
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Maryjoe Rice
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amr Al-Abbas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Surgical simulation avoids practicing skills in patients, allowing trainees to learn in a safe, controlled, and standardized environment. Current robotic surgical simulators available include virtual reality simulators, human cadavers, and live animals. The use of cadavers has the highest possible fidelity available to practice entire operations. Nevertheless, their cost, availability, tissue compliance, and infection risk outweigh the advantages of cadaver models. Drawbacks of using live animals include anatomical differences with humans, high costs due to their housing and handling requirements, and ethical concerns. We designed a novel robotic surgical simulator based on porcine perfused tissue blocks that allows the simulation of entire surgical procedures. Our simulation allows trainees to increase familiarity with the robotic console and its controls, as well as with the docking process. It provides an opportunity to learn not only universal skills needed in robotic surgery, such as camera and instrument targeting, but also to perform complete surgical procedures such as an antireflux procedure. The adoption of robotic simulation curricula with realistic models will decrease overall operative time while increasing resident participation.
Collapse
|