Graft loss: Review of a single burn center's experience and proposal of a graft loss grading scale

Initial Experience Combining Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Autologous Skin Cell Suspension and Meshed Autografts

The success of autologous split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) in the treatment of full-thickness burns is often dependent on the dressing used to secure it. Tie-over bolsters have been used traditionally; however, they can be uncomfortable for patients and preclude grafting large areas in one definitive operation. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used as an alternative to bolster dressings and may afford additional wound healing benefits. In our center, NPWT has become the dressing of choice for securing STSGs. While the RECELL® system is being used in conjunction with STSGs, it is currently unknown whether autologous skin cell suspensions (ASCS) can be used with NPWT. This report is a retrospective chart review of nine patients treated in this manner. All wounds were almost completely re-epithelialized within 14 days, and their healing was as expected. Wound healing trajectories are shown. There were no significant complications in these patients. This dressing technique can be considered as an option when using ASCS and widely meshed STSG.

A Pilot Study of Negative Pressure Therapy with Autologous Skin Cell Suspensions in a Porcine Model

BACKGROUND

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an option for securing meshed split thickness skin grafts (mSTSGs) after burn excision to optimize skin graft adherence. Recently, the use of autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) has been approved for use in the treatment of burn injuries in conjunction with mSTSGs.To date, limited data exists regarding the impact of NPWT on healing outcomes when the cellular suspension is utilized. It was hypothesized that NPWT would not negatively impact wound healing of ASCS+mSTSG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A burn, excision, mSTSG, ASCS ± NPWT model was used. Two Duroc pigs were utilized in this experiment, each with 2 sets of paired burns. Four wounds received mSTSG+ASCS+NPWT through post-operative day 3, and 4 wounds received mSTSG+ACSC+ traditional ASCS dressings. Cellular viability was characterized prior to spraying. Percent re-epithelialization, graft-adherence, pigmentation, elasticity, and blood perfusion and blood vessel density were assessed at multiple time points through 2 weeks.

RESULTS

All wounds healed within 14 days with minimal scar pathology and no significant differences in percent re-epithelialization between NPWT, and non-NPWT wounds were observed. Additionally, no differences were detected for pigmentation, perfusion, or blood vessel density. NPWT treated wounds had less graft loss and improved elasticity, with elasticity being statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest the positive attributes of the cellular suspension delivered are retained following the application of negative pressure. Re-epithelialization, revascularization, and repigmentation are not adversely impacted. The use of NPWT may be considered as an option when using ASCS with mSTSGs for the treatment of full-thickness burns.

Plasma protein C levels are directly associated with better outcomes in patients with severe burns

Protein C circulates in human plasma to regulate inflammation and coagulation. It has shown a crucial role in wound healing in animals, and low plasma levels predict the presence of a wound in diabetic patients. However, no detailed study has measured protein C levels in patients with severe burns over the course of a hospital admission. A severe burn is associated with dysfunction of inflammation and coagulation as well as a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. The current methods of burn assessment have shortcomings in reliability and have limited prognostic value. The discovery of a biomarker that estimates burn severity and predicts clinical events with greater accuracy than current methods may improve management, resource allocation and patient counseling. This is the first study to assess the potential role of protein C as a biomarker of burn severity. We measured the plasma protein C levels of 86 patients immediately following a severe burn, then every three days over the first three weeks of a hospital admission. We also analysed the relationships between burn characteristics, blood test results including plasma protein C levels and clinical events. We used a primary composite outcome of increased support utilisation defined as: a mean intravenous fluid administration volume of five litres or more per day over the first 72 h of admission, a length of stay in the intensive care unit of more than four days, or greater than four surgical procedures during admission. The hypothesis was that low protein C levels would be negatively associated with increased support utilisation. At presentation to hospital after a severe burn, the mean plasma protein C level was 76 ± 20% with a range of 34-130% compared to the normal range of 70-180%. The initial low can be plausibly explained by impaired synthesis, increased degradation and excessive consumption of protein C following a burn. Levels increased gradually over six days then remained at a steady-state until the end of the inpatient study period, day 21. A multivariable regression model (Nagelkerke's R² = 0.83) showed that the plasma protein C level on admission contributed the most to the ability of the model to predict increased support utilisation (OR = 0.825 (95% CI = 0.698-0.977), P = 0.025), followed by burn size (OR = 1.252 (95% CI = 1.025-1.530), P = 0.027), burn depth (partial thickness was used as the reference, full thickness OR = 80.499 (1.569-4129.248), P = 0.029), and neutrophil count on admission (OR = 1.532 (95% CI = 0.950-2.473), P = 0.08). Together, these four variables predicted increased support utilisation with 93.2% accuracy, 83.3% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity. However if protein C values were disregarded, only 49.5% of the variance was explained, with 82% accuracy, 63% sensitivity and 91.5% specificity. Thus, protein C may be a useful biomarker of burn severity and study replication will enable validation of these novel findings.