An ad hoc three dimensionally printed tool facilitates intraesophageal suturing in experimental surgery

Transformative applications of additive manufacturing in biomedical engineering: bioprinting to surgical innovations

This paper delves into the diverse applications and transformative impact of additive manufacturing (AM) in biomedical engineering. A detailed analysis of various AM technologies showcases their distinct capabilities and specific applications within the medical field. Special emphasis is placed on bioprinting of organs and tissues, a revolutionary area where AM has the potential to revolutionize organ transplantation and regenerative medicine by fabricating functional tissues and organs. The review further explores the customization of implants and prosthetics, demonstrating how tailored medical devices enhance patient comfort and performance. Additionally, the utility of AM in surgical planning is examined, highlighting how printed models contribute to increased surgical precision, reduced operating times, and minimized complications. The discussion extends to the 3D printing of surgical instruments, showcasing how these bespoke tools can improve surgical outcomes. Moreover, the integration of AM in drug delivery systems, including the development of innovative drug-loaded implants, underscores its potential to enhance therapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects. It also addresses personalized prosthetic implants, regulatory frameworks, biocompatibility concerns, and the future potential of AM in global health and sustainable practices.

Future trends of additive manufacturing in medical applications: An overview

Additive Manufacturing (AM) has recently demonstrated significant medical progress. Due to advancements in materials and methodologies, various processes have been developed to cater to the medical sector's requirements, including bioprinting and 4D, 5D, and 6D printing. However, only a few studies have captured these emerging trends and their medical applications. Therefore, this overview presents an analysis of the advancements and achievements obtained in AM for the medical industry, focusing on the principal trends identified in the annual report of AM3DP.

Transanal endoscopic surgery with a 3D printed device

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of devices manufactured with 3D printing for performing transanal endoscopic procedures without pneumorectum.

METHODS

Functional devices were designed in the Polytechnic School of Engineering of Gijón from 2016 to 2018 using three-dimensional (3D) solid modelling software (Solid-Works®), that allows customization of the device (diameter and length). The devices were made in acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) by additive manufacturing using an HP Designjet 3D Printer, with fused deposition modelling (FDM) technology. Tests were carried out on mixed simulators (with viscera) and cadavers with a prototype in the form of an open cylindrical base ellipsoid spindle with two bars. In this paper, we present the information of the first series of patients in which this device has been used to perform a full-thikness endoscopic resection of the rectal wall without pneumorectum. The characteristics of the patients, size, and location of the lesion, the type of anesthesia used, the duration of the procedure, hospital stay, complications, and pathology were analyzed. An endoscopic follow-up was also carried out for at least 2 years.

RESULTS

Seven interventions were carried out in six patients. The lesions were located at a mean distance of 5 cm from the anal verge and an average area of 11.8 cm². Four of the procedures were performed with general anesthesia and 3 with spinal anesthesia. Histopathology examination identified 3 adenomas, 3 pT1 and 1 pT2 adenocarcinomas. All excisions were full thickness. En bloc excision was possible in all cases. In only one case of a benign polyp there was a positive lateral margin. As regards complications, there was one case of postoperative rectal bleeding without the need for transfusions. There were no readmissions and no postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

An innovative device made with a 3D printer can be used successfully in transanal endoscopic resections of the rectal wall, with spinal anaesthesia and avoiding the need for pneumorectum.

Surgical Performance Is Not Negatively Impacted by Wearing a Commercial Full-Face Mask with Ad Hoc 3D-Printed Filter Connection as a Substitute for Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial

(1) Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, shortages in the supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) have become apparent. The idea of using commonly available full-face diving (FFD) masks as a temporary solution was quickly spread across social media. However, it was unknown whether an FFD mask would considerably impair complex surgical tasks. Thus, we aimed to assess laparoscopic surgical performance while wearing an FFD mask as PPE. (2) Methods: In a randomized-controlled cross-over trial, 40 laparoscopically naive medical students performed laparoscopic procedures while wearing an FFD mask with ad hoc 3D-printed connections to heat and moisture exchange (HME) filters vs. wearing a common surgical face mask. The performance was evaluated using global and specific Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) checklists for suturing and cholecystectomy. (3) Results: For the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, both global OSATS scores and specific OSATS scores for the quality of procedure were similar (Group 1: 25 ± 4.3 and 45.7 ± 12.9, p = 0.485, vs. Group 2: 24.1 ± 3.7 and 43.3 ± 7.6, p = 0.485). For the laparoscopic suturing task, the FFD mask group needed similar times to the surgical mask group (3009 ± 1694 s vs. 2443 ± 949 s; p = 0.200). Some participants reported impaired verbal communication while wearing the FFD mask, as it muffled the sound of speech, as well as discomfort in breathing. (4) Conclusions: FFD masks do not affect the quality of laparoscopic surgical performance, despite being uncomfortable, and may therefore be used as a substitute for conventional PPE in times of shortage—i.e., the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Applications of PLA in modern medicine

Polylactic acid (PLA) is a versatile biopolymer. PLA is synthesized with ease from abundant renewable resources and is biodegradable. PLA has shown promise as a biomaterial in a plethora of healthcare applications such as tissue engineering or regenerative medicine, cardiovascular implants, dental niches, drug carriers, orthopedic interventions, cancer therapy, skin and tendon healing, and lastly medical tools / equipment. PLA has demonstrated instrumental importance as a three-dimensionally (3D) printable biopolymer, which has further been bolstered by its role during the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (Covid-19) global pandemic. As an abundant filament, PLA has created desperately needed personal protective equipment (PPE) and ventilator modifications. As polymer chemistry continues to advance, so too will the applications and continued efficacy of PLA-based modalities.

An overview on 3D printing for abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a disruptive technology that is quickly spreading to many fields, including healthcare. In this context, it allows the creation of graspable, patient-specific, anatomical models generated from medical images. The ability to hold and show a physical object speeds up and facilitates the understanding of anatomical details, eases patient counseling and contributes to the education and training of students and residents. Several medical specialties are currently exploring the potential of this technology, including general surgery.

METHODS

In this review, we provide an overview on the available 3D printing technologies, together with a systematic analysis of the medical literature dedicated to its application for abdominal surgery. Our experience with the first clinical laboratory for 3D printing in Italy is also reported.

RESULTS

There was a tenfold increase in the number of publications per year over the last decade. About 70% of these papers focused on kidney and liver models, produced primarily for pre-interventional planning, as well as for educational and training purposes. The most used printing technologies are material jetting and material extrusion. Seventy-three percent of publications reported on fewer than ten clinical cases.

CONCLUSION

The increasing application of 3D printing in abdominal surgery reflects the dawn of a new technology, although it is still in its infancy. The potential benefit of this technology is clear, however, and it may soon lead to the development of new hospital facilities to improve surgical training, research, and patient care.