Dobutamine Versus Vasopressin After Mesenteric Ischemia

The Effects of Dobutamine in Septic Shock: An Updated Narrative Review of Clinical and Experimental Studies

The key objective in the hemodynamic treatment of septic shock is the optimization of tissue perfusion and oxygenation. This is usually achieved by the utilization of fluids, vasopressors, and inotropes. Dobutamine is the inotrope most commonly recommended and used for this purpose. Despite the fact that dobutamine was introduced almost half a century ago in the treatment of septic shock, and there is widespread use of the drug, several aspects of its pharmacodynamics remain poorly understood. In normal subjects, dobutamine increases contractility and lacks a direct effect on vascular tone. This results in augmented cardiac output and blood pressure, with reflex reduction in systemic vascular resistance. In septic shock, some experimental and clinical research suggest beneficial effects on systemic and regional perfusion. Nevertheless, other studies found heterogeneous and unpredictable effects with frequent side effects. In this narrative review, we discuss the pharmacodynamic characteristics of dobutamine and its physiologic actions in different settings, with special reference to septic shock. We discuss studies showing that dobutamine frequently induces tachycardia and vasodilation, without positive actions on contractility. Since untoward effects are often found and therapeutic benefits are occasional, its profile of efficacy and safety seems low. Therefore, we recommend that the use of dobutamine in septic shock should be cautious. Before a final decision about its prescription, efficacy, and tolerance should be evaluated throughout a short period with narrow monitoring of its wanted and side effects.

Microcirculation and Mitochondria: The Critical Unit

Critical illness is often accompanied by a hemodynamic imbalance between macrocirculation and microcirculation, as well as mitochondrial dysfunction. Microcirculatory disorders lead to abnormalities in the supply of oxygen to tissue cells, while mitochondrial dysfunction leads to abnormal energy metabolism and impaired tissue oxygen utilization, making these conditions important pathogenic factors of critical illness. At the same time, there is a close relationship between the microcirculation and mitochondria. We introduce here the concept of a "critical unit", with two core components: microcirculation, which mainly comprises the microvascular network and endothelial cells, especially the endothelial glycocalyx; and mitochondria, which are mainly involved in energy metabolism but perform other non-negligible functions. This review also introduces several techniques and devices that can be utilized for the real-time synchronous monitoring of the microcirculation and mitochondria, and thus critical unit monitoring. Finally, we put forward the concepts and strategies of critical unit-guided treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Vasopressin and Terlipressin in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The use of arginine vasopressin (AVP) and terlipressin to treat hypotension in preterm neonates is increasing. Our aim was to review the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of AVP and terlipressin for use in preterm neonates.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to September 2021 were searched for studies of AVP and terlipressin in the treatment of hypotension of any cause in preterm neonates. Primary outcomes were improvement in end-organ perfusion and mortality. The risk of bias assessment and certainty of the evidence were performed using appropriate tools.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies describing the use of AVP (n = 12) or terlipressin (n = 3) among 148 preterm neonates were included. Certainly, the available evidence for the primary outcome of end-organ perfusion rated as very low. AVP or terlipressin were used to treat 144 and 4 neonates, respectively. Improvement in markers of end-organ perfusion was reported in 143 (99%) neonates treated with AVP and 3 (75%) treated with terlipressin. The mortality rate was 41% (n = 59) and 50% (n = 2) for neonates who received AVP and terlipressin, respectively. Hyponatremia was the most frequently reported adverse event (n = 37, 25%).

CONCLUSION

AVP and terlipressin may improve measured blood pressure values and possibly end-organ perfusion among neonates with refractory hypotension. However, the efficacy-safety balance of these drugs should be assessed on an individual basis and as per the underlying cause. Studies on the optimal dosing, efficacy, and safety of AVP and terlipressin in preterm neonates with variable underlying conditions are critically needed.

Vasopressors and Risk of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: A Worldwide Pharmacovigilance Analysis and Comprehensive Literature Review

Vasodilatory shock, such as septic shock, requires personalized management which include adequate fluid therapy and vasopressor treatments. While these potent drugs are numerous, they all aim to counterbalance the vasodilatory effects of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Their specific receptors include α- and β-adrenergic receptors, arginine-vasopressin receptors, angiotensin II receptors and dopamine receptors. Consequently, these may be associated with severe adverse effects, including acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). As the risk of AMI depends on drug class, we aimed to review the evidence of plausible associations by performing a worldwide pharmacovigilance analysis based on the World Health Organization database, VigiBase®. Among 24 million reports, 104 AMI events were reported, and disproportionality analyses yielded significant association with all vasopressors, to the exception of selepressin. Furthermore, in a comprehensive literature review, we detailed mechanistic phenomena which may enhance vasopressor selection, in the course of treating vasodilatory shock.

Sub-therapeutic vasopressin but not therapeutic vasopressin improves gastrointestinal microcirculation in septic rats: A randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded trial

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis impairs gastrointestinal microcirculation and it is hypothesized that this might increase patient's mortality. Sub-therapeutic vasopressin improves gastric microcirculation under physiologic conditions whereas a therapeutic dosing regimen seems to be rather detrimental. However, the effects of sub-therapeutic vasopressin on gastrointestinal microcirculation in sepsis are largely unknown. Therefore, we conducted this trial to investigate the effect of sub-therapeutic as well as therapeutic vasopressin on gastrointestinal microcirculation in sepsis.

METHODS

40 male Wistar rats were randomized into 4 groups. Colon ascendens stent peritonitis (CASP)-surgery was performed to establish mild or moderate sepsis. 24 hours after surgery, animals received either vasopressin with increasing dosages every 30 min (6.75, 13.5 (sub-therapeutic), 27 mU · kg-1 · h-1 (therapeutic)) or vehicle. Microcirculatory oxygenation (μHBO2) of the colon was recorded for 90 min using tissue reflectance spectrophotometry. Intestinal microcirculatory perfusion (total vessel density (TVD; mm/mm2) and perfused vessel density (PVD; mm/mm2)) were measured using incident dark field-Imaging at baseline and after 60 min.

RESULTS

In mild as well as in moderate septic animals with vehicle-infusion intestinal μHbO2, TVD and PVD remained constant. In contrast, in moderate sepsis, sub-therapeutic vasopressin with 13.5 mU · kg-1 · h-1 elevated intestinal μHBO2 (+ 6.1 ± 5.3%; p < 0.05 vs. baseline) and TVD (+ 5.2 ± 3.0 mm/mm2; p < 0.05 vs. baseline). μHBO2, TVD and PVD were significantly increased compared to moderate sepsis alone. However, therapeutic vasopressin did not change intestinal microcirculation. In mild septic animals sub-therapeutic as well as therapeutic vasopressin had no relevant effect on gastrointestinal microcirculation. Systemic blood pressure remained constant in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Sub-therapeutic vasopressin improves gastrointestinal microcirculatory oxygenation in moderate sepsis without altering systemic blood pressure. This protective effect seems to be mediated by an enhanced microcirculatory perfusion and thereby increased oxygen supply. In contrast, therapeutic vasopressin did not show this beneficial effect.

Vasoactive agents in acute mesenteric ischaemia in critical care. A systematic review

Background: Acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) is a surgical emergency which has an associated high mortality.  The mainstay of active treatment includes early surgical intervention, with resection of non-viable bowel, and revascularisation of the ischaemic bowel where possible. Due to the physiological insult of AMI however, perioperative care often involves critical care and the use of vasoactive agents to optimise end organ perfusion. A number of these vasoactive agents are currently available with varied mechanism of action and effects on splanchnic blood flow. However, specific guidance on which is the optimal vasoactive drug to use in these settings is limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence comparing vasoactive drugs in AMI. Methods: A systematic search of Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review was performed on the 5th of November 2020 to identify randomised clinical trials comparing different vasoactive agents in AMI on outcomes including mortality. The search was performed through the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) search support library. Results were analysed using the Rayyan platform, and independently screened by four investigators. Results: 614 distinct papers were identified. After screening, there were no randomised clinical trials meeting the inclusion criteria. Conclusions: This review identifies a gap in literature, and therefore recommends an investigation into current practice and clinician preference in relation to vasoactive agents in AMI. Multicentre randomised controlled trials comparing these medications on clinical outcomes will therefore be required to address this question.

Vasoactive agents in acute mesenteric ischaemia in critical care. A systematic review

Background: Acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) is a surgical emergency which has an associated high mortality.  The mainstay of active treatment includes early surgical intervention, with resection of non-viable bowel, and revascularisation of the ischaemic bowel where possible. Due to the physiological insult of AMI however, perioperative care often involves critical care and the use of vasoactive agents to optimise end organ perfusion. A number of these vasoactive agents are currently available with varied mechanism of action and effects on splanchnic blood flow. However, specific guidance on which is the optimal vasoactive drug to use in these settings is limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence comparing vasoactive drugs in AMI. Methods: A systematic search of Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review was performed on the 5th of November 2020 to identify randomised clinical trials comparing different vasoactive agents in AMI on outcomes including mortality. The search was performed through the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) search support library. Results were analysed using the Rayyan platform, and independently screened by four investigators. Results: 614 distinct papers were identified. After screening, there were no randomised clinical trials meeting the inclusion criteria. Conclusions: This review identifies a gap in literature, and therefore recommends an investigation into current practice and clinician preference in relation to vasoactive agents in AMI. Multicentre randomised controlled trials comparing these medications on clinical outcomes will therefore be required to address this question.

Hemodynamic Influences on Mesenteric Blood Flow in Shock Conditions

The gastrointestinal (GI) system, is most vulnerable to hypoperfusion among the splanchnic organs. Disturbed perfusion of the mesenteric area may lead to GI dysfunction, cause further injury to the patients and even vital outcomes. However, due to the limitation of detection methods, the hemodynamic influences on mesenteric blood flow in clinical practice are not fully understood. By elucidating the underlying mechanisms, we may be able to recognize disturbed GI perfusion and eventually GI dysfunction at an early phase. Thus, in this review, we will focus on situations where mesenteric blood flow is disturbed due to hemodynamic causes in shock conditions, and the present research status will be discussed. English language articles published before 2020 were identified through a computerized PubMed search using the terms "mesenteric, gastrointestinal, intestinal, splanchnic, blood flow, perfusion" and the cofactors. Relevant publications were retrieved and scanned for additional sources. There were few clinical trials focusing on mesenteric blood flow in shock patients. Most were animal experiments. Based on the best current evidence from these sources, we described the major influences on mesenteric blood flow in the context of physiologic accommodation, disease-related effects and the consequences of medical interventions related to shock conditions. During circulatory shock, sepsis, and medical interventions related to shock treatment, mesenteric blood flow changes and shows different features. We need to carefully consider these issues when making medical decisions, and more work needs to be done on early detection of GI hypoperfusion and its accurate correlation with GI dysfunction.

A clinical approach to acute mesenteric ischemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize current evidence on acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) in critically ill patients, addressing pathophysiology, definition, diagnosis and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

A few recent studies showed that a multidiscipliary approach in specialized centers can improve the outcome of AMI. Such approach incorporates current knowledge in pathophysiology, early diagnosis with triphasic computed tomography (CT)-angiography, immediate endovascular or surgical restoration of mesenteric perfusion, and damage control surgery if transmural bowel infarction is present. No specific biomarkers are available to detect early mucosal injury in clinical setting. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia presents particular challenges, as the diagnosis based on CT-findings as well as vascular management is more difficult; some recent evidence suggests a possible role of potentially treatable stenosis of superior mesenteric artery and beneficial effect of vasodilator therapy (intravenous or local intra-arterial). Medical management of AMI is supportive, including aiming of euvolemia and balanced systemic oxygen demand/delivery. Enteral nutrition should be withheld during ongoing ischemia-reperfusion injury and be started at low rate after revascularization of the (remaining) bowel is convincingly achieved.

SUMMARY

Clinical suspicion leading to tri-phasic CT-angiography is a mainstay for diagnosis. Diagnosis of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia and early intestinal injury remains challenging. Multidisciplinary team effort may improve the outcome of AMI.

Cardioprotective shock management: monitoring and supportive therapies

Cardiogenic shock is a highly lethal syndrome, leading to rapid death or secondary multiorgan damage, but current shock therapies, including mechanical support devices, also have a significant side effect profile. The overarching goal of shock therapy is ensuring long-term survival with good quality of life. This implies averting death, modifying the disease course by promoting heart recovery and avoiding additional cardiac damage, protecting other organs, and circumventing complications. Monitoring and supportive therapies are subordinate to these goals. Rather than merely following preconceived notions, the rapid evolution in mechanical support technology requires iterative and critical review of the benefits of current procedures, protocols and drugs in view of their overall contribution to the therapeutic goals. This article discusses various monitoring and supportive pharmaceutical modalities typically used in patients with cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical support.

[Perioperative pharmacological circulatory support in daily clinical routine]

Perioperative phases of hypotension are associated with an increase in postoperative complications and organ damage. Whereas some years ago hemodynamic stabilization was primarily carried out by volume supplementation, in recent years the use and dosing of cardiovascular-active substances has significantly increased. But like intravascular volume therapy, also substances with a cardiovascular effect have therapeutic margins, and thus, potential side effects. This review article discusses indications for each cardiovascular-active agent, weighing up advantages and disadvantages. Special attention is paid to the question how to administrate them: central venous catheter vs. peripheral indwelling venous cannula. The authors come to the conclusion that it is not a question of whether it is principally allowed to apply cardiovascular-active drugs via peripheral veins but more importantly, what should be taken into consideration if a peripheral venous access is used. This article provides concise recommendations.