2011 ACGME Duty Hour Limits had No Association With Breast Reconstruction Complications

Impact of sleep deficiency on surgical performance: a prospective assessment

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Sleep deficiency can adversely affect the performance of resident physicians, resulting in greater medical errors. However, the impact of sleep deficiency on surgical outcomes, particularly among attending surgeons, is less clear.

METHODS

Sixty attending surgeons from academic and community departments of surgery or obstetrics and gynecology were studied prospectively using direct observation and self-report to explore the effect of sleep deprivation on patient safety, operating room communication, medical errors, and adverse events while operating under 2 conditions, post-call (defined as > 2 hours of nighttime clinical duties) and non-post-call.

RESULTS

Each surgeon contributed up to 5 surgical procedures post-call and non-post-call, yielding 362 cases total (150 post-call and 210 non-post-call). Most common were caesarian section and herniorrhaphy. Hours of sleep on the night before the operative procedure were significantly less post-call (4.98 ± 1.41) vs non-post-call (6.68 ± 0.88, P < .01). Errors were infrequent and not related to hours of sleep or post-call status. However, Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons ratings demonstrated poorer performance while post-call for situational awareness, decision-making, and communication/teamwork. Fewer hours of sleep also were related to lower ratings for situational awareness and decision-making. Decreased self-reported alertness was observed to be associated with increased procedure time.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep deficiency in attending surgeons was not associated with greater errors during procedures performed during the next day. However, procedure time was increased, suggesting that surgeons were able to compensate for sleep loss by working more slowly. Ratings on nontechnical surgical skills were adversely affected by sleep deficiency.

CITATION

Quan SF, Landrigan CP, Barger LK, et al. Impact of sleep deficiency on surgical performance: a prospective assessment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(4):673-683.

Evaluating the Impact of ACGME Resident Duty Hour Restrictions on Patient Outcomes for Bilateral Breast Reductions

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented duty-hour restrictions limiting residents to 80 hours per week in 2003 and further extended restrictions in 2011 to improve resident and patient well-being. Numerous studies have examined the effects of these restrictions on patient outcomes with inconclusive results. Few efforts have been made to examine the impact of this reform on the safety of common plastic surgery procedures. This study seeks to assess the influence of ACGME duty-hour restrictions on patient outcomes, using bilateral breast reduction mammoplasty as a marker for resident involvement and operative autonomy.

Methods

Bilateral breast reductions performed in the 3 years before and after each reform were collected from the National Inpatient Sample database: pre-duty hours (2000-2002), duty hours (2006-2008), and extended duty hours (2012-2014). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to investigate the association between ACGME duty hour restrictions on medical and surgical complications.

Results

Overall, 19,423 bilateral breast reductions were identified. Medical and surgical complication rates in these patients increased with each successive iteration of duty hour restrictions (P < 0.001). The 2003 duty-hour restriction independently associated with increased surgical (OR = 1.51, P < 0.001) and medical complications (OR = 1.85, P < 0.001). The 2011 extended duty-hour restriction was independently associated with increased surgical complications (OR = 1.39, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

ACGME duty-hour restrictions do not seem associated with better patient outcomes for bilateral breast reduction although there are multiple factors involved. These considerations and consequences should be considered in decisions that affect resident quality of life, education, and patient safety.

ACGME 2011 Duty Hours Restrictions and Their Effects on Surgical Residency Training and Patients Outcomes: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The ACGME instituted the 2011 residency duty-hour restrictions (DHR) to increase resident well-being and patient safety. However, its eventual remodeling came after patient care was deemed unaffected. We aimed to identify the effects of the ACGME 2011-DHR on (1) patient outcomes, (2) surgical resident case volume, and (3) surgical resident quality of life.

DESIGN

Literature search using Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase for publications between 2010 and 2020, on the 2011-DHR effects on resident and patient outcomes. Studies containing the number of cases performed during training, quality of life, and surgical patients' outcomes were included.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria. There was no difference in complication rates for surgical patients post 2011-DHR (p = 0.561). 2011-DHR caused surgical caseload shifts from interns to senior residents reflected by decreased operative cases for interns (p = 0.005) with significantly more total cases performed by chief residents (p = 0.0006). Pre-2011-DHR had more work flexibility that led to higher resident well-being (p = 0.01). Only 25% of residents approved of the 2011-DHR while 87% felt these restrictions would have adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Current literature supports that the 2011-DHR did not improve patient outcomes, decreased surgical experience for junior residents and shifted clinical responsibilities to senior residents. System wide regulations such as the 2011-DHR may unintentionally create professional and personal life imbalance and introduce stress over resident inability to perform clinical responsibilities. Future systemic interventions to address resident well-being should be made with caution and not solely limited to the number of hours they work in a single week or in a single shift.