1
|
Fitzgerald CA, Kernell C, Mejia-Martinez V, Peng G, Zakaria H, Zhu M, Butler D, Bruns B. The contemporary management of perforated appendicitis in adults: To operate or wait? Surg Open Sci 2024; 20:242-246. [PMID: 39156487 PMCID: PMC11327589 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives The optimal management of perforated appendicitis remains controversial. Many studies advocate for antibiotics and an interval appendectomy whereas others suggest that performing an appendectomy at the time of presentation decreases post-operative morbidity. Confounding this argument further are the patients who fail non-operative management and end up requiring surgery during their initial hospitalization. This study aims to determine if early operative intervention should be considered for perforated appendicitis. Methods This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent an appendectomy (both laparoscopic or open) for perforated appendicitis between 2015 and 2020 at our institution. Results A total of 271 patients met inclusion criteria for this study. Of this group, 250 patients underwent an immediate appendectomy whereas the remaining 21 patients underwent a trial of non-operative management and eventually required an appendectomy during their initial admission. When comparing the immediate versus delayed operative groups, there were no differences in demographic data including age and gender, and no differences in various imaging findings including AAST Grade IV or V appendicitis. Operatively, patients in the delayed group had a longer operative time (83.1 ± 32.9 vs. 64.1 ± 26.2, p = 0.01), were more likely to require an open operation (23.8 % vs. 2.8 %, p < 0.0001), and were more likely to have a drain placed intra-operatively (42.9 % vs 14.4 %, p = 0.004). While there were no differences in 30-day readmission rates, patients in the delayed group had a significantly longer hospital length of stay than patients in the immediate group (9.4 ± 7.4 vs. 3.1 ± 3.3, p = 0.008). Conclusions Patients undergoing an immediate appendectomy for perforated appendicitis can discharge from the hospital sooner and demonstrate no increase in post-operative morbidity suggesting that surgeons can initially manage this disease process in an operative fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A. Fitzgerald
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Caroline Kernell
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Giselle Peng
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Heba Zakaria
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michelle Zhu
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Dale Butler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Burns, Trauma, Acute and Critical Care Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brandon Bruns
- Department of Surgery, Division of Burns, Trauma, Acute and Critical Care Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu C, Fields AC, Zhao B, Castillo-Angeles M, Havens JM, Salim A, Askari R, Nitzschke SL. Early surgery for perforated appendicitis: Are we moving the needle on postoperative abscess? Am J Surg 2023; 226:256-260. [PMID: 37210329 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perforated appendicitis is often managed nonoperatively though upfront surgery is becoming more common. We describe postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing surgery at their index hospitalization for perforated appendicitis. METHODS We used the 2016-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients with appendicitis who underwent appendectomy or partial colectomy. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI). RESULTS 132,443 patients with appendicitis underwent immediate surgery. Of 14.1% patients with perforated appendicitis, 84.3% underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Intra-abdominal abscess rates were lowest after laparoscopic appendectomy (9.4%). Open appendectomy (OR 5.14, 95% CI 4.06-6.51) and laparoscopic partial colectomy (OR 4.60, 95% CI 2.38-8.89) were associated with higher likelihoods of SSIs. CONCLUSIONS Upfront surgical management of perforated appendicitis is now predominantly approached by laparoscopy, often without bowel resection. Postoperative complications occurred less frequently with laparoscopic appendectomy compared to other approaches. Laparoscopic appendectomy during the index hospitalization is an effective approach to perforated appendicitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Wu
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Adam C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Bixiao Zhao
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Manuel Castillo-Angeles
- Division of Trauma, Burn, Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Joaquim M Havens
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Division of Trauma, Burn, Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ali Salim
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Division of Trauma, Burn, Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Reza Askari
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Division of Trauma, Burn, Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Stephanie L Nitzschke
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Division of Trauma, Burn, Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dibekoğlu C. Does the length matter in acute appendicitis for the perforation risk?: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e32001. [PMID: 36482564 PMCID: PMC9726347 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
It has been hypothesized that short appendices increase intraluminal pressure more rapidly and perforate more frequently than long appendices. Two hundred seventy-seven adult patients were retrospectively analyzed and underwent an appendectomy between January 2015 and August 2021. Data extracted from patient records included sex, age, time from admission to operation (hospital interval), weekday or weekend operation time, and operative and pathological findings. Operation was performed on 273 patients, of whom 178 (65.2%) were male and 95 (34.8%) female. The mean age of the male patients was 31.7 ± 08 (range 18-67), and that of the female patients was 38.9 ± 1.4 (range 18-78). Perforation was observed in 57 (20.9%) patients. Sex was not a factor in the development of perforation (P = .95). The mean age of the patients with and without perforation was 40.1 ± 2.2 and 32.7 ± 0.7, respectively. The perforation rate increased with age (P = .003). Appendix lengths were similar in both groups, and length was not a factor in the development of perforation (P = .83). This study found that the development of perforated appendicitis is not related to the length of the appendix. The risk of perforation increased with age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cengiz Dibekoğlu
- Department of General Surgery, Demiroglu Bilim University, İstanbul, Turkey
- * Correspondence: Cengiz Dibekoğlu, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hastanesi, Abidei Hurriyet cad No. 156 Sisli Istanbul 34381, Turkey (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oba T, Yamada T, Matsuda A, Otani M, Matsuda S, Ohta R, Yoshida H, Sato N, Hirata K. Patient backgrounds and short‐term outcomes of complicated appendicitis differ from those of uncomplicated appendicitis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 6:273-281. [PMID: 35261953 PMCID: PMC8889856 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Appendicitis is classified as either complicated (CA) or uncomplicated (UA). Some authors have shown that the epidemiologic trends of CA and UA may differ. The aim of this study was to clarify differences in backgrounds and surgical outcomes between CA and UA patients. Methods This study was a cohort study. We extracted case data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database from January 2014 to December 2017. Patients were classified into three groups, depending on whether they underwent emergency appendectomy for CA (CA group), emergency appendectomy for UA (UA group), or elective appendectomy (EA group). We evaluated patient characteristics and surgical outcomes for each group. Results We included 89,355 adult patients in the study, comprising 29,331 CA, 48,691 UA, and 11,333 EA patients. Old age, larger body mass index, smoking, and medication with antidiabetic drugs, oral corticosteroids, oral antiplatelet drugs, and oral anticoagulant drugs were independent risk factors for CA. The percentage of CA increased with age. In‐hospital mortality (0.15%, 0.02%, and 0.00%) and 30‐d mortality (0.09%, 0.01%, and 0.00%), respectively, of CA patients were significantly higher than those of the UA and EA groups. The duration of postoperative antibiotic administration, duration of fasting, and time before removal of a prophylactic drain were significantly longer in the CA group than in the UA and EA groups. Conclusion Backgrounds and treatment outcomes of CA and UA patients after emergency surgery are entirely different. Thus, the treatment strategy of CA and UA patients should differ accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Oba
- Department of Surgery 1 School of Medicine University of Occupational and Environmental Health Fukuoka Japan
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
| | - Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
| | - Makoto Otani
- Occupational Health Data Science Centre University of Occupational and Environmental Health Fukuoka Japan
| | - Shinya Matsuda
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health School of Medicine University of Occupational and Environmental Health Fukuoka Japan
| | - Ryo Ohta
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
| | - Norihiro Sato
- Department of Surgery 1 School of Medicine University of Occupational and Environmental Health Fukuoka Japan
| | - Keiji Hirata
- Department of Surgery 1 School of Medicine University of Occupational and Environmental Health Fukuoka Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yamada T, Endo H, Hasegawa H, Kimura T, Kakeji Y, Koda K, Ishida H, Sakamoto K, Hirata K, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, Matsuda A, Yoshida H, Kitagawa Y. Risk of emergency surgery for complicated appendicitis: Japanese nationwide study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:236-242. [PMID: 33860144 PMCID: PMC8034695 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Appendicitis is divided into two categories: complicated appendicitis (CA) and uncomplicated appendicitis (UA). In pediatric patients with CA, the use of interval appendectomy (IA), which is non-operative management followed by elective surgery, has decreased the number of postoperative complications. Before discussing the merit of IA for adult patients, we need to clarify whether the frequency and seriousness of the complication rate after emergency surgery is higher for CA than for UA. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent appendectomy and who were registered in the National Clinical Database (NCD) from 2014 to 2016. Patients with CA who underwent emergency appendectomy comprised the CA group. Patients with UA comprised the UA group. Patients with chronic or recurrent appendicitis who underwent elective appendectomy comprised the elective appendectomy (EA) group. Primary outcomes were all morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality within 30 days after appendectomy. RESULTS We included 109 256 patients in the study: 14 798 CA, 86 876 UA, and 7582 EA patients. Compared with the UA group, the rates of all morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality were significantly higher in the CA group. All morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality rates were significantly lower in the EA group than in the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed that emergency surgery for CA places the patient at relatively higher risk. We also showed that the risk associated with EA is significantly lower than that for the other methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Hideki Endo
- Department of Healthcare Quality AssessmentGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Hasegawa
- Project Management SubcommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Toshimoto Kimura
- Project Management SubcommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Database CommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Keiji Koda
- Department of SurgeryTeikyo University Chiba Comprehensive Medical CenterChibaJapan
| | - Hideyuki Ishida
- Department of Digestive Tract and General SurgerySaitama Medical UniversitySaitamaJapan
| | - Kazuhiro Sakamoto
- Department of Coloproctological SurgeryJuntendo University Faculty of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Keiji Hirata
- Department of Surgery 1University of Occupational and Environmental HealthKitakyushuJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Quality AssessmentGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality AssessmentGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|