Status of Simulation-Based Training in Departments of Surgery in the United States

Role of simulation-based training and assessment to improve brachytherapy competency among radiation oncology residents

Simulation is a technique used in healthcare to replicate clinical scenarios and improve patient safety, efficacy, and efficiency. Simulation-based medical education facilitates training and assessment in healthcare without increasing risk to patients, supported by ample evidence from surgical/procedural specialties. Simulation in radiation oncology has been leveraged to an extent, with successful examples of both screen-based and hands-on simulators that have improved confidence and performance in trainees. In the current era, evidence substantiates a significant deficit in brachytherapy procedure education, with radiation oncology residents reporting low confidence in this procedural skill, largely attributable to insufficient caseloads at some centers. Simulation-based medical education can facilitate structured training and competency-based assessment in brachytherapy skills. This review discusses existing advances and future directions in brachytherapy simulation, using examples from simulation in surgical specialties.

Integrating simulation into surgical training: a qualitative case study of a national programme

BACKGROUND

Applying simulation-based education (SBE) into surgical curricula is challenging and exacerbated by the absence of guidance on implementation processes. Empirical studies evaluating implementation of SBE interventions focus primarily on outcomes. However, understanding the processes involved in organising, planning, and delivering SBE adds knowledge on how best to develop, implement, and sustain surgical SBE. This study used a reform of early years surgical training to explore the implementation of a new SBE programme in Scotland. It aimed to understand the processes that are involved in the relative success (or failure) when implementing surgical SBE interventions.

METHODS

This qualitative case study, underpinned by social constructionism, used publicly available documents and the relevant surgical SBE literature to inform the research focus and contextualise data obtained from semi-structured interviews with core surgical trainees (n = 46), consultant surgeons (n = 25), and key leaders with roles in surgical training governance in Scotland (n = 7). Initial data coding and analysis were inductive. Secondary data analysis was then undertaken using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). NPTs' four constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, reflexive monitoring) provided an explanatory framework for scrutinising how interventions are implemented, embedded, and integrated into practice, i.e. the "normalisation" process.

RESULTS

Distributed leadership (individual SBE initiatives assigned to faculty but overall programme overseen by a single leader) and the quality improvement practise of iterative refinement were identified as key novel processes promoting successful normalisation of the new SBE programme. Other processes widely described in the literature were also identified: stakeholder collaboration, personal contacts/relational processes, effective communication, faculty development, effective leadership, and tight programme management. The study also identified that learners valued SBE activities in group- or team-based social environments over isolated deliberate practice.

CONCLUSIONS

SBE is most effective when designed as a comprehensive programme aligned to the curriculum. Programmes incorporating both group-based and isolated SBE activities promote deliberate practice. Distributed leadership amongst faculty attracts wide engagement integral to SBE programme implementation, while iterative programme refinement through regular evaluation and action on feedback encourages integration into practice. The knowledge contributed by critically analysing SBE programme implementation processes can support development of much needed guidance in this area.

The Development and Application of a Cost-Effective Cervical Spine Phantom for Use in Fluoroscopically Guided Lateral C1-C2 Spinal Puncture Training

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lateral C1-C2 spinal punctures are uncommon procedures performed by radiologists for access to CSF and contrast injection when a lumbar approach is contraindicated and an alternate method of access becomes necessary. There are limited opportunities to learn and practice the technique. We aimed to develop and assess the efficacy of a low-cost, reusable cervical spine phantom for training in fluoroscopically guided lateral C1-C2 spinal puncture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The phantom was constructed with a cervical spine model, an outer tube representing the thecal sac, an inner balloon representing the spinal cord, and polyalginate to replicate soft tissue. The total cost of materials was approximately US $70. Workshops were led by neuroradiology faculty experienced in the procedure using the model under fluoroscopy. Survey questions were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants were given pre- and postsurveys assessing comfort, confidence, and knowledge of steps.

RESULTS

Twenty-one trainees underwent training sessions. There was significant improvement in comfort level (Δ: 2.00, SD: 1.00, P value < .001); confidence (Δ: 1.52 points, SD: 0.87, P value < .001); and knowledge (Δ: 2.19, SD: 0.93, P value < .001). Eighty-one percent of participants found the model "very helpful" (5/5 on Likert scale), and all participants were "very likely" to recommend this workshop to others.

CONCLUSIONS

This cervical phantom model is affordable and replicable and demonstrates training utility to prepare residents for performing lateral C1-C2 spinal puncture. This is a rare procedure, so the use of a phantom model before patient encounters is invaluable to resident education and training.

Simulation-Based Outreach Program Improves Rural Hospitals’ Team Confidence in Neonatal Resuscitation

Introduction: Neonatal resuscitation is a high acuity, low occurrence event (HALO), and in rural community hospitals, low birth rates prevent providers from regular opportunities to maintain essential resuscitation skills. Simulation is an effective training modality for medical education, although resources for simulation are often limited in rural hospitals. Our primary objective was to test the hypothesis that in situ neonatal resuscitation simulation training improves rural hospitals' delivery room team confidence in performing key Neonatal Resuscitation Program^® (NRP^®) skills. Our secondary objective was to compare confidence to performance as measured by adherence to NRP® guidelines.

Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental pre-training survey and post-training survey of delivery room team confidence in NRP^® skills at five level one delivery hospitals before and after an in situ simulation training program. Participants included rural hospitals’ usual delivery room team members. Participants rated their confidence on a five-point Likert scale. Simulations were analyzed using an adapted version of a validated scoring tool for NRP^® adherence and presented as overall percentage scores.

Results: Our data demonstrate a significant improvement in self-assessed confidence levels pre- and post-simulation training in key areas of neonatal resuscitation. Participants reported higher confidence in airway management (4 vs. 3, p=0.003), emergency intravenous access (3 vs. 2, p=0.007), and the ability to manage a code in the delivery room (4 vs. 3, p=0.013) and the operating room (4 vs. 3, p=0.028). Improvements were also noted in their team member’s knowledge and skills to perform neonatal resuscitation. While improvements were appreciated in confidence, the performance of skills (NRP^® adherence scores) was often in the sub-optimal performance range.

Conclusions: An in situ-based neonatal resuscitation outreach simulation program improves self-confidence among rural delivery room teams. Additional research is needed to understand how to translate improved confidence into actual improved performance. 

Simulation for Foregut and Bariatric Surgery: Current Status and Future Directions

Simulation offers the opportunity to practice in a safe, controlled, and standardized environment. Surgical simulation, in particular, is very attractive because it avoids learning and practicing surgical skills in the operating room. Many simulators are currently available such as box-lap trainers, virtual-reality platforms, cadavers, live animals, animal-based tissue blocks, and synthetic/artificial models. Endoscopic interventions can be practiced with high-fidelity virtual simulators. Box-lap trainers help practicing basic laparoscopic skills. Cadavers and live animals offer realism to train entire foregut and bariatric procedures. However, limited availability and high expenses often restrict their use. Ex vivo simulators with animal tissue blocks have been recently developed and appear to be a realistic and cost-effective alternative. Three-dimensional printing and real-time navigation systems have also emerged as promising training tools. Overall, further efforts are needed to develop a formal simulation curriculum with validated simulators for foregut and bariatric surgery.