Efficacy and Safety Profile of Rectus Sheath Block in Adult Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-analysis

Effect of Rectus Sheath Block on Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Transabdominal Midline Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction

Rectus sheath block is an emerging technique that provide effective perioperative analgesia and is related to lower perioperative opioid consumption and decrease opioid-related adverse effects. The present research is designed to explore the effect of rectus sheath block on recovery quality in patients following transabdominal midline gynecological surgery.

Methods

Ninety female patients following elective transabdominal midline gynecological surgery were enrolled. Patients were randomized to group R (n = 45) which receive preoperative ultrasound-guided RSB with 0.4% ropivacaine or group C which is control group (n = 45). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery on the first postoperative day. The quality of recovery was assessed by the 40-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-40). Secondary outcomes included the intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first flatus and time to first discharging from bed, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction.

Results

The patients in two groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Postoperative global QoR-40 scores were significantly better in group R than in group C (165.0[159.5-170.0] vs 155.0[150.0-157.0], respectively; median difference 12[95% confidence interval: 8-15, P<0.001]). Preoperative RSB reduced intraoperative opioid consumption, reduced the time to first flatus, time to first discharging from bed and the post anaesthesia care unit discharge time. Furthermore, group R showed greater patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

A single preoperative administration of RSB with ropivacaine improved the quality of recovery in patients following transabdominal midline gynecological surgery.

Preoperative versus postoperative ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block for acute postoperative pain relief after laparoscopy: A retrospective cohort study

Although rectus sheath block (RSB) is routinely used in laparoscopic surgeries to reduce mid-abdominal pain, whether RSB should be performed before or after surgery remains unclear. Herein, the optimal timing for RSB in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was investigated. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of patients who underwent RSB during laparoscopic procedures at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2018. The primary outcome was the time to rescue analgesia within 24 hours postanesthesia. The patients were divided into preoperative (pre-) and postoperative (post-) RSB groups. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the time to rescue analgesia in the unmatched and propensity score (PS)-matched patient populations. In total, 609/14,284 patients were included (pre-RSB group, 227 patients; post-RSB group, 382 patients). After PS matching, 97 patients were assigned to both groups. Although the time from extubation to the first analgesic request was not significantly different between the 2 groups (322 vs 294 minutes, P = .57), the patients in the pre-RSB group showed a lower risk of postoperative first analgesic administration after PS matching (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.95; P = .023). Among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, those in the pre-RSB group tended to have a longer time to the first analgesic request and had a lower risk of analgesic administration within the first 24 hours than those in the post-RSB group. Thus, performing RSB preoperatively may be preferable.

Investigation into the clinical performance of rectus sheath block in reducing postoperative pain following surgical intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background and Aims

Rectus sheath block (RSB) is an effective postoperative pain control technique in abdominal surgical procedures. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and outcome data of patients undergoing RSB compared to the standard of care in both laparoscopic and open surgical procedures.

Methods

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022372596). The search was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RSB effectiveness on postoperative pain to any standard general anaesthesia technique (control). We systematically explored PubMed, Medline, Central, Scopus and Web of Science for RCTs from inception to September 2023. The primary outcome was the evaluation of pain scores at rest 0-2, 10-12 and 12-24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the analysis of postoperative intravenous (IV) morphine equivalent consumption at 24-h. A risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (ROB 2.0, Cochrane, Copenhagen, Denmark) assessment and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE, Cochrane, Copenhagen, Denmark) analysis was conducted to evaluate the quality of the RCTs.

Results

Twenty RCTs involving 708 participants who received RSB intervention and 713 who received alternative analgesic care were included. RSB pain scores were significantly lower than control at 0-2 h (P < 0.001) and 10-12 h (P < 0.001) postoperatively. No significant effect was observed at 24 h (P = 0.11). RSB performance compared to control in 24-h IV morphine equivalency in milligrams was significantly lower (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

RSB implementation was associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and decreased opioid consumption in IV morphine equivalency up to 24 h following surgical intervention.

The Efficiency of Multipoint Rectus Sheath Block Based on Incision Location in Laparoscopic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery is an effective surgery to treat colorectal cancer. During the laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery, a midline incision and several trocar insertions are required during the surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To observe whether the rectus sheath block based on the locations of the surgical incision and trocars can significantly reduce the pain score on the first day after surgery.

DESIGN

This study was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (registration number: ChiCTR2100044684).

SETTINGS

All patients were recruited from 1 hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty-six patients aged 18 to 75 years undergoing elective laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery were successfully recruited, and 44 patients completed the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients in the experimental group received rectus sheath block, with 0.4% ropivacaine 40 to 50 mL, whereas the control group received an equal volume of normal saline.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was pain score on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes included patient-controlled analgesia use at 24 and 48 hours after surgery and pain score at 6, 12, and 48 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

Pain scores at rest and during activity at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery and patient-controlled analgesia consumption of patients on the first day after surgery were significantly lower in the experimental group than those in the control group (all p < 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

We did not separate pain into visceral and somatic pain because patients often had difficulty differentiating the source of pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research indicates that in the context of multimodal analgesia, the rectus sheath block according to the midline incision and the positions of the trocars can reduce the pain scores and consumption of analgesic drugs on the first day after surgery for patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery.

LA EFICIENCIA DEL BLOQUEO DE LA VAINA DEL RECTO DE VARIOS PUNTOS SEGN LA UBICACIN DE LA INCISIN EN LA CIRUGA COLORRECTAL ASISTIDA POR LAPAROSCOPIA UN ENSAYO CLNICO ALEATORIZADO

ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía colorrectal asistida por laparoscopia es una cirugía eficaz para tratar el cáncer colorrectal. Durante la cirugía colorrectal asistida por laparoscopia, se requiere una incisión en la línea media y varias inserciones de trócaresOBJETIVO:El propósito de nuestro estudio fue observar si el bloqueo de la vaina del recto basado en las ubicaciones de la incisión quirúrgica y los trocares puede reducir significativamente la puntuación del dolor en el primer día después de la cirugía.DISEÑO:Este estudio fue un ensayo controlado aleatorio prospectivo, doble ciego, aprobado por el Comité de Ética del Primer Hospital Afiliado de la Universidad Médica de Anhui (número de registro: ChiCTR2100044684).ESCENARIO:Todos los pacientes fueron reclutados en un hospital.PACIENTES:Cuarenta y seis pacientes de 18 a 75 años de edad que se sometieron a cirugía colorrectal electiva asistida por laparoscopía fueron reclutados con éxito y cuarenta y cuatro pacientes completaron el ensayo.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes del grupo experimental recibieron bloqueo de la vaina del recto con 40-50 ml de ropivacaína al 0.4%, mientras que el grupo de control recibió el mismo volumen de solución salina normal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la puntuación del dolor en el día 1 postoperatorio. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron el uso de analgesia controlada por el paciente a las 24 y 48 horas después de la cirugía y la puntuación del dolor a las 6, 12, y 48 horas después de la cirugía.RESULTADOS:Las puntuaciones de dolor en reposo y durante la actividad a las 6, 12, 24, y 48 horas después de la cirugía, y el consumo de PCA de los pacientes el primer día después de la cirugía fueron significativamente más bajos en el grupo experimental que en el grupo control (todos p < 0.05).LIMITACIONES:No separamos el dolor en dolor visceral y somático porque los pacientes a menudo tenían dificultades para diferenciar la fuente del dolor.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestra investigación indica que, en el contexto de la analgesia multimodal, el bloqueo de la vaina del recto de acuerdo con la incisión de la línea media y las posiciones de los trócares pueden reducir los puntajes de dolor y el consumo de analgésicos en el primer día después de la cirugía para pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

The Effect of Various Combinations of Peripheral Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Prospective Study

Objectives

Most patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) experience moderate to severe pain in the first 24 hours after surgery. The transversus abdominal plane (TAP) is currently used for post-LC analgesia. Posterior, subcostal, or rectus sheath TAP blocks are the conventional approaches used. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy of combinations of various peripheral blocks on pain intensity and the use of pain killers, shortly after LC.

Methods

This was a prospective, double-blind study, in which 200 patients who were about to undergo a LC procedure were recruited and randomized into 4 groups: patients receiving one of the following: TAP block alone, subcostal Tap block alone, subcostal TAP block with a TAP block, or subcostal TAP with a rectus sheath block. The intensity of pain (VAS score) and the use of painkillers were monitored in the recovery unit and in the department for up to 24 hours after surgery.

Results

Pain levels decreased with time from 3.6 ± 3.2 at 30 minutes to 0.9 ± 2.0 at 24 hours after the surgery. Nevertheless, no difference between the various block types groups was noted. The percentage of patients who consumed analgesic medications decreased over time, from 83% at 30 to 21% at 24 hours after surgery. The mean/median number of medications consumed by each of the patients was lower among the patients who received a combination of 2 blocks compared to those who received a single one (mean/median of 2.7/3 and 2.8/3 for the TAP or subcostal TAP blocks, respectively; 2.5/2 and 2.3/2 for the subcostal TAP + TAP or subcostal TAP + rectus sheath blocks, respectively).

Conclusion

A combination of peripheral nerve blocks reduced the use of analgesic consumption during the 24 hours after LC surgery, compared to standalone blocks.

Chest Wall and Abdominal Blocks for Thoracic and Abdominal Surgeries: A Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date description and overview of the rapidly growing literature pertaining to techniques and clinical applications of chest wall and abdominal fascial plane blocks in managing perioperative pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical evidence suggests that regional anesthesia blocks, including fascial plane blocks, such as pectoralis, serratus, erector spinae, transversus abdominis, and quadratus lumborum blocks, are effective in providing analgesia for various surgical procedures and have more desirable side effect profile when compared to traditional neuraxial techniques. They offer advantages such as reduced opioid consumption, improved pain control, and decreased opioid-related side effects. Further research is needed to establish optimal techniques and indications for these blocks. Presently, they are a vital instrument in a gamut of multimodal analgesia options, especially when there are contraindications to neuraxial or para-neuraxial procedures. Ultimately, clinical judgment and provider skill set determine which blocks-alone or in combination-should be offered to any patient.

Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and rectus sheath block in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled noninferiority trial

INTRODUCTION

In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program, abdominal wall blocks are strongly recommended as postoperative multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of single-shot rectus sheath block (RSB) with that of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) as a method of multimodal analgesia in patients receiving conventional laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A noninferiority comparison was performed. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric or colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: TEA and RSB. The primary endpoint was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score upon coughing as of 24 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive TEA (n = 42) or RSB (n = 38). Three patients were excluded from the TEA group after randomization. The NRS score on coughing as of 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group (least square mean: 3.59 vs 6.39; 95% confidence interval for the difference: 1.87 to 3.74, P < .001). The NRS scores upon coughing and at rest were significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group as of 4, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in the TEA group. Postoperative adverse events were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of comparing RSB with TEA in laparoscopic surgery. TEA may be recommended as a multimodal analgesia protocol for laparoscopic gastric and colorectal surgery.

The comparison of postoperative analgesic requirements between modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach versus wound infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective, exploratory study

INTRODUCTION

Recently, modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) has been introduced as a novel trunk block. To date, studies comparing its clinical advantages with those of existing local anesthetic techniques are scarce. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA to that of wound infiltration analgesia (WIA) in patients who underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgeries.

METHODS

We studied medical records from January 2020 to July 2021 at Hokkaido University Hospital. The primary outcome was the number of analgesic requirements in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the time until the first analgesic requirement and adverse events regarding local anesthetic techniques. To address confounding, a regression model was used.

RESULTS

Data from 90 of 231 patients were analyzed (M-TAPA group, n = 40; WIA group, n = 50). For the primary outcome, means and 95% confidence intervals for each group and between-group differences were as follows: 2.25 (1.74, 2.76), 2.28 (1.81, 2.75), and -0.03 (-0.72, 0.66), respectively. Adjusted mean difference was 0.39 (-0.32, 1.11). There were no significant differences in means between groups, with or without adjustment for covariates (p = 0.93, 0.28). Furthermore, no significant difference was detected in the time until the first analgesic requirement and adverse events related to local anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that M-TAPA did not reduce postoperative analgesic requirements compared to WIA. In a future clinical trial, sufficient visceral pain control may be required to evaluate the effectiveness of M-TAPA over WIA in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

Effect of rectus sheath anaesthesia versus thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative recovery quality after elective open abdominal surgery in a French regional hospital: the study protocol of a randomised controlled QoR-RECT-CATH trial

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols increase patient well-being while significantly reducing mortality, costs and length-of-stay after surgery. A key component is multimodal analgesia that prevents postoperative pain and facilitates early refeeding and mobilisation. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) was long the gold standard for locoregional anaesthesia in anterior abdominal wall surgery. However, newer wall-block techniques such as rectus-sheath block (RSB) may be preferable because they are less invasive and may provide equivalent analgesia with fewer side effects. Since the evidence base remains limited, the Quality Of Recovery enhanced by REctus sheat CATHeter (QoR-RECT-CATH) randomised controlled trial (RCT) was designed to assess whether RSB elicits better postoperative rehabilitation than TEA after laparotomy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This open-label parallel-arm 1:1-allocated RCT will determine whether RSB is superior to TEA in 110 patients undergoing scheduled midline laparotomy in terms of postoperative rehabilitation quality. The setting is a regional French hospital that provides opioid-free anaesthesia for all laparotomies within an ERAS programme. Recruited patients will be ≥18 years, scheduled to undergo laparotomy, have American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-4 and lack contraindications to ropivacaine/TEA. TEA-allocated patients will receive an epidural catheter before surgery while RSB-allocated patients will receive rectus sheath catheters after surgery. All other pre/peri/postoperative procedures will be identical, including multimodal postoperative analgesia provided according to our standard of care. Primary objective is a change in total Quality-of-Recovery-15 French-language (QoR-15F) score on postoperative day (POD) 2 relative to baseline. QoR-15F is a patient-reported outcome measure that is commonly used to measure ERAS outcomes. The 15 secondary objectives include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, functional recovery measures and adverse events.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The French Ethics Committee (Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer I Ethical Committee) gave approval. Subjects are recruited after providing written consent after receiving the information provided by the investigator. The results of this study will be made public through peer-reviewed publication and, if possible, conference publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04985695.

Opioid-Sparing Effect of Multi-Point Incision-Based Rectus Sheath Block in Laparoscopic-Assisted Radical Gastrectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Profound trauma from laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) requires medication with a large number of opioids. The purpose of our study was to observe whether an incision-based rectus sheath block (IBRSB) based on the locations of the surgical incision could significantly reduce the consumption of remifentanil during LAG.

METHODS

A total of 76 patients were included. The patients were prospectively randomized into two groups. Patients in group IBRSB (n = 38) received ultrasound-guided IBRSB, and the patients received 0.4% ropivacaine 40-50 mL. Patients in group C (n = 38) received the same IBRSB with 40-50 mL normal saline. The following were recorded: the consumption of remifentanil and sufentanil during surgery, pain scores at rest and during conscious activity in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery, and use of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) at 24 and 48 h after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 60 participants completed the trial. The consumption of remifentanil and sufentanil in group IBRSB were significantly lower than that in group C (p < 0.001). Pain scores at rest and during conscious activity in the PACU and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery and patients' PCA consumption within 48 h of surgery were significantly lower in group IBRSB than in group C (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

IBRSB based on incision multimodal anesthesia can effectively reduce the consumption of opioids during LAG, improving the postoperative analgesic effect and increasing patients' satisfaction.

Single-shot regional anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different regional anesthesia (RA) techniques have been used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), but there is no consensus on their comparative effectiveness. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of RA techniques on patients undergoing LC using a network meta-analysis approach.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index) using the following PICOS criteria: (P) adult patients undergoing LC; (I) any RA single-shot technique with injection of local anesthetics; (C) placebo or no intervention; (O) postoperative opioid consumption expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MME), rest pain at 12 h and 24 h post-operation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of stay; and (S) randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

A total of 84 studies were included. With the exception of the rectus sheath block (P = 0.301), the RA techniques were superior to placebo at reducing opioid consumption. Regarding postoperative pain, the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block (-1.80 on an 11-point pain scale) and erector spinae plane (ESP) block (-1.33 on an 11-point pain scale) were the most effective at 12 and 24 h. The TAP block was also associated with the greatest reduction in PONV.

CONCLUSIONS

RA techniques are effective at reducing intraoperative opioid use, postoperative pain, and PONV in patients undergoing LC. Patients benefit the most from the bilateral paravertebral, ESP, quadratus lumborum, and TAP blocks.

Complications and Technical Consideration of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Blocks: A Retrospective Analysis of 4033 Patients

BACKGROUND

Although the ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) is usually regarded as an easy and safe procedure in clinical settings, there is currently no report on complications incidence. Therefore, the present study investigated complications in a large cohort and described the technical considerations to minimize complications of real-time ultrasound-guided RSBs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guided RSBs for perioperative pain control in laparoscopic surgery with an umbilical port between February 1, 2017, and February 28, 2021, at the Asan Medical Center in South Korea. All RSBs were performed bilaterally using a 23-gauge Quincke needle, and a bilateral 2-block placement was regarded as 1 RSB. Patient data, including demographics, preoperative laboratory data, preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication with the duration of discontinuation, and type of surgery, were collected to show the study population characteristics and explore potential factors associated with adverse events such as hematoma. Ultrasound images of patients and adverse events of RSBs, including extrarectus sheath injections, vascular injuries, bowel injury, or local anesthetic systemic toxicity, were also analyzed accordingly.

RESULTS

A total of 4033 procedures were analyzed. The mean body mass index of the patients was 24.1 (21.8-26.5) kg/m2. The preoperative laboratory data were within normal range in 4028 (99.9%) patients. Preoperative antiplatelets or anticoagulants were administered in 17.3% of the patients. Overall, 96 complications (2.4%) were observed. Among them, extrarectus sheath injection occurred in 88 cases (2.2%), which included preperitoneal injection (0.9%) and intraperitoneal injection (1.3%). Vascular injuries constituted 8 cases (0.2%) and all vascular injuries resulted in hematoma: 7 cases of inferior epigastric artery injury with rectus sheath hematoma and 1 of inferior mesenteric artery injury with retroperitoneal hematoma. Bowel injury or local anesthetic systemic toxicity was not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of RSBs performed on 4033 patients using a 23-gauge Quincke needle in patients with low body mass index, there were 8 cases (0.2%) of vascular injury, all of which accompanied hematoma.

Can Postoperative Pain Be Prevented in Bariatric Surgery? Efficacy and Usability of Fascial Plane Blocks: a Retrospective Clinical Study

BACKGROUND

Providing analgesia after bariatric surgery might be challenging due to a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and the increased sensitivity to respiratory depression triggered by opioid overuse after surgery. Various combination methods with paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and other pain medications such as ketamine or gabapentin have been suggested for reduction of the opioid usage. Regional anesthetic techniques represent a valuable option as they improve patient comfort while reducing opioid-related side effects. In this study, we have evaluated the adjuvant benefits of these various techniques in reduction of the postoperative pain in bariatric surgery.

METHODS

After the approval of the IRB Ethics Committee, the records of the patients who had laparoscopic bariatric surgery between January 2019 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Records of 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery between January 2019 and December 2021 were reviewed. In total, 113 patients with full documentation were included in this study. Among these, 74 patients were administered regional analgesia. The main regional analgesia techniques were transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block. The pain scores of those receiving regional analgesia were statistically low. The opioid consumption after transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block was significantly lower than that of others. External oblique intercostal block alone provides a postoperative opioid consumption similar to those of transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block.

CONCLUSION

The use of fascial plane blocks in bariatric surgery significantly reduces opioid consumption. Transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block combination and external oblique intercostal block seem to be the most effective options.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

NCT05284695.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery at Primary and Secondary Hospitals in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC's): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendation

Background

This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline for primary and secondary hospitals in low–middle-income countries (LMIC’s) for elective abdominal and gynecologic care.

Methods

The ERAS LMIC Guidelines group was established by the ERAS® Society in collaboration with different representatives of perioperative care from LMIC’s. The group consisted of seven members from the ERAS® Society and eight members from LMIC’s. An updated systematic literature search and evaluation of evidence from previous ERAS® guidelines was performed by the leading authors of the Colorectal (2018) and Gynecologic (2019) surgery guidelines (Gustafsson et al in World J Surg 43:6592–695, Nelson et al in Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(4):651–668). Meta-analyses randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies from both HIC’s and LMIC’s were considered for each perioperative item. The members in the LMIC group then applied the current evidence and adapted the recommendations for each intervention as well as identifying possible new items relevant to LMIC’s. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (GRADE) methodology was used to determine the quality of the published evidence. The strength of the recommendations was based on importance of the problem, quality of evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable effects, acceptability to key stakeholders, cost of implementation and specifically the feasibility of implementing in LMIC’s and determined through discussions and consensus.

Results

In addition to previously described ERAS® Society interventions, the following items were included, revised or discussed: the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), preoperative routine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in countries with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS (CD4 and viral load for those patients that are HIV positive), delirium screening and prevention, COVID 19 screening, VTE prophylaxis, immuno-nutrition, prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and a standardized postoperative monitoring guideline.

Conclusions

These guidelines are seen as a starting point to address the urgent need to improve perioperative care and to effect data-driven, evidence-based care in LMIC’s.

Minimal effective dose of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block to reduce oral analgesic requirement after ambulatory laparoscopic tubal resection: a randomized controlled superiority trial

Background

The effective dose during ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (URSB) for reducing pain after laparoscopic tubal ligation is reported to be 100 mg of 0.25% bupivacaine. We examined the minimal effective dose of 0.25% bupivacaine for URSB on oral analgesic requirement after ambulatory single-port laparoscopic tubal resection.

Methods

A prospective, randomized controlled, superiority trial was conducted among patients who had been scheduled for ambulatory laparoscopic tubal resection between September 2015 and January 2019 at a tertiary care hospital in southern Thailand. Anesthesia was induced following protocol. The intervention group was allocated to receive a bilateral URSB using 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on either side after intubation (total 50 mg) while the control group did not receive the sham block. Patients and assessors were blinded to the study intervention. All patients received a multimodal analgesia regimen as follows: fentanyl and ketorolac intraoperatively and fentanyl and oral acetaminophen at the post-anesthetic care unit. Postoperative oral analgesic requirement (acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen) at home was the primary outcome. Postoperative time to first analgesic requirement, oral analgesia (acetaminophen/ibuprofen), and pain score at 6 and 24 h were accessed via telephone interviews. Percentage, effect size (ES), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were presented.

Results

A total of 66 out of 79 eligible patients were analyzed (32 intervention, 34 control). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the intervention group (ES [95% CI]: 0.58 [0.08, 1.07] mcg, p = 0.022). Time to first oral analgesia in the intervention group was significantly longer than that of the control group (ES [95% CI]: 0.66 [0.14, 1.16] h, p = 0.012). The proportion of oral analgesia requirement at 24 h after surgery in the control group was significantly higher than that in the intervention group (97% vs 75%, p = 0.012). Pain scores at 6 and 24 h were similar in both groups although slightly lower in the intervention group (ES [95% CI]: 0.22 [−0.26, 0.71], p = 0.368 and 0.33 [−0.16, 0.81], p = 0.184, respectively).

Conclusion

A dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 50 mg for URSB reduced the oral analgesic requirement at 24 h and prolonged the time to first analgesic requirement after ambulatory laparoscopic tubal resection.

Trial registration

Thaiclinicaltrials.orgTCTR20150921002. Registered on 18 September 2015

Description of an ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block injection technique and the spread of dye in calf cadavers

OBJECTIVES

To describe an ultrasound-guided rectus sheath (RS) block technique in calves with injections of methylene blue and assess the extent of injectate spread and nerve staining in calf cadavers.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, experimental, blinded cadaveric study.

ANIMALS

A total of 16 calf cadavers weighing 30.7 ± 7.1 kg.

METHODS

Using an ultrasound-guided, in-plane technique, each cadaver was injected with both a low (LV; 0.25 mL kg-1) and high (HV; 0.5 mL kg-1) volume of methylene blue dye. Volumes were randomly assigned to the left or right hemiabdomen. Ultrasound imaging was scored based on landmarks and needle visualization, and duration to perform injections were assessed. Dissections were performed immediately after injections. Staining of ventral branches of spinal nerves and the extent of dye spread were recorded by an anatomist unaware of treatment allocation.

RESULTS

The number of nerves stained in treatments LV and HV were 2.3 ± 1.7 and 4.4 ± 1.3, respectively (p = 0.0001). Branches of thoracic nerves T7-13 and lumbar nerves L1-2 were completely stained 6.3%, 6.3%, 31.3%, 62.5%, 56.3%, 37.5%, 31.3%, 6.3% and 0%, respectively, in treatment LV and 0%, 12.5%, 50%, 93.8%, 100%, 93.8%, 62.5%, 25% and 6.3%, respectively, in treatment HV. Ultrasound imaging was scored excellent in most cadavers and needle visualization deemed excellent in all injections. The mean duration to perform RS injections in both treatments was 2 (range, 1-6) minutes.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Nerve staining results from treatment HV suggest that this RS injection technique could be clinically useful in ventral midline surgical procedures, including umbilical procedures, in calves. This study supports future clinical trials in calves.

Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Pain Management for Laparoscopic Surgery: a Review of the Current Literature

Purpose of Review

The field of regional anesthesia has evolved tremendously in the last 15 years. New anesthesia protocols for ambulatory surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery have been developed as well. The focus of these techniques and protocols has centered on patient satisfaction and pain control while minimizing the use of opioids. The field of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia continues to evolve, and regional anesthesia and its plane techniques are at the center of these changes.

Recent Findings

Recent research has shown that regional techniques contribute to better pain control and patient experience and may decrease patient readmission rates. The safety of these techniques has been validated when performed by experienced practitioners. New techniques such as the erector spinae block (ESP) have been studied in the setting of laparoscopic surgery with promising results.

Summary

Regional anesthesia techniques for patients presenting for laparoscopic surgery are safe and seem to provide benefits. Those are related to patient experience, pain control, and readmission rates. Different techniques can be applied to a specific type of intervention. Application of these techniques depend on the clinical picture and patient. Future research may help us clarify how these techniques may improve patient satisfaction and operating room efficiency. New regional blocks may also develop based on what we know today.

The Use of Peripheral Nerve Blockade in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery: Is There a Benefit?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to synthesize recent literature investigating the use of regional anesthesia for minimally invasive surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies investigating the use of newer peripheral nerve blocks such as erector spinae plane (ESP) and quadratus lumborum (QL) block are very limited. Evidence supporting the use of peripheral nerve blockade in laparoscopic or robotic surgery is very limited and of low-moderate quality. While transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block may decrease opioid and pain scores after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bariatric surgery, and colorectal surgery, the benefit of the block in the presence of multimodal analgesia remains to be clarified. Unilateral paravertebral block may be beneficial for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. ESP and rectus sheath blockade may enhance analgesia in laparoscopic surgery, but the magnitude of this benefit may not be clinically relevant. Limited evidence supports the use of QL block in laparoscopic urologic surgery. There is insufficient recent evidence to support the use of TAP or QL block for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.