Inborn Versus Outborn Delivery in Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Place of birth and postnatal transfers in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia in England and Wales: a descriptive observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To describe clinical pathways for infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and short-term outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study using the UK National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD).

PATIENTS

Babies with a diagnosis of CDH admitted to a neonatal unit in England and Wales between 2012 and 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical pathways defined by place of birth (with or without colocated neonatal and surgical facilities), transfers, clinical interventions, length of hospital stay and discharge outcome.

RESULTS

There were 1319 babies with a diagnosis of CDH cared for in four clinical pathways: born in maternity units with (1) colocated tertiary neonatal and surgical units ('neonatal surgical units'), 50% (660/1319); (2) designated tertiary neonatal unit and transfer to stand-alone surgical centre ('tertiary designated'), 25% (337/1319); (3) non-designated tertiary neonatal unit ('tertiary non-designated'), 7% (89/1319); or (4) non-tertiary unit ('non-tertiary'), 18% (233/1319)-the latter three needing postnatal transfers. Infant characteristics were similar for infants born in neonatal surgical and tertiary designated units. Excluding 149 infants with minimal data due to early transfer (median (IQR) 2.2 (0.4-4.5) days) to other settings, survival to neonatal discharge was 73% (851/1170), with a median (IQR) stay of 26 (16-44) days.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that half of the babies with CDH were born in hospitals that did not have on-site surgical services and required postnatal transfer. Similar characteristics between infants born in neonatal surgical units and tertiary designated units suggest that organisation rather than infant factors influence place of birth. Future work linking the NNRD to other datasets will enable comparisons between care pathways.

Predictors of Mortality in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists regarding the mortality of very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). This study aims to quantify and determine predictors of mortality in VLBW neonates with CDH.

METHODS

This analysis of 829 U.S. NICUs included VLBW [birth weight ≤1500g] neonates, born 2011-2021 with and without CDH. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A generalized estimating equation regression model determined the adjusted risk ratio (ARR) of mortality.

RESULTS

Of 426,140 VLBW neonates, 535 had CDH. In neonates with CDH, 48.4% had an additional congenital anomaly vs 5.5% without. In-hospital mortality for neonates with CDH was 70.4% vs 12.6% without. Of those with CDH, 73.3% died by day of life 3. Of VLBW neonates with CDH, 38% were repaired. A subgroup analysis was performed on 60% of VLBW neonates who underwent delivery room intubation or mechanical ventilation, as an indicator of active treatment. Mortality in this group was 62.7% for neonates with CDH vs 16.4% without. Higher Apgars at 1 min and repair of CDH were associated with lower mortality (ARR 0.91; 95%CI 0.87,0.96 and ARR 0.28; 0.21,0.39). The presence of additional congenital anomalies was associated with higher mortality (ARR 1.14; 1.01,1.30).

CONCLUSION

These benchmark data reveal that VLBW neonates with CDH have an extremely high mortality. Almost half of the cohort have an additional congenital anomaly which significantly increases the risk of death. This study may be utilized by providers and families to better understand the guarded prognosis of VLBW neonates with CDH.

TYPE OF STUDY

Level II.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Sex-Specific Differences in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Mortality

OBJECTIVE

To compare disease severity and mortality differences between female and male patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

STUDY DESIGN

We queried the CDH Study Group (CDHSG) database for CDH neonates managed between 2007 and 2018. Female and males were compared in statistical analyses using t tests, χ² tests, and Cox regression, as appropriate (P ≤ .05).

RESULTS

There were 7288 CDH patients, of which 3048 (41.8%) were female. Females weighed less on average at birth than males (2.84 kg vs 2.97 kg, P < .001) despite comparable gestational age. Females had similar rates of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) utilization (27.8% vs 27.3%, P = .65). Although both cohorts had equivalent defect size and rates of patch repair, female patients had increased rates of intrathoracic liver herniation (49.2% vs 45.9%, P = .01) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) (86.6% vs 81.1%, P < .001). Females had lower survival rates at 30-days (77.3% vs 80.1%, P = .003) and overall lower survival to discharge (70.2% vs 74.2%, P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that increased mortality was significant among those who underwent repair but were never supported on ECLS (P = .005). On Cox regression analysis, female sex was independently associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

After controlling for the established prenatal and postnatal predictors of mortality, female sex remains independently associated with a higher risk of mortality in CDH. Further study into the underlying causes for sex-specific disparities in CDH outcomes is warranted.

Association between birth location and short-term outcomes for babies with gastroschisis, congenital diaphragmatic hernia and oesophageal fistula: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neonatal care is commonly regionalised, meaning specialist services are only available at certain units. Consequently, infants with surgical conditions needing specialist care who are born in non-surgical centres require postnatal transfer. Best practice models advocate for colocated maternity and surgical services as the place of birth for infants with antenatally diagnosed congenital conditions to avoid postnatal transfers. We conducted a systematic review to explore the association between location of birth and short-term outcomes of babies with gastroschisis, congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and oesophageal atresia with or without tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF/OA).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases for studies from high income countries comparing outcomes for infants with gastroschisis, CDH or TOF/OA based on their place of delivery. Outcomes of interest included mortality, length of stay, age at first feed, comorbidities and duration of parenteral nutrition. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We present a narrative synthesis of our findings.

RESULTS

Nineteen cohort studies compared outcomes of babies with one of gastroschisis, CDH or TOF/OA. Heterogeneity across the studies precluded meta-analysis. Eight studies carried out case-mix adjustments. Overall, we found conflicting evidence. There is limited evidence to suggest that birth in a maternity unit with a colocated surgical centre was associated with a reduction in mortality for CDH and decreased length of stay for gastroschisis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence to suggest that delivery in colocated maternity-surgical services may be associated with shortened length of stay and reduced mortality. Our findings are limited by significant heterogeneity, potential for bias and paucity of strong evidence. This supports the need for further research to investigate the impact of birth location on outcomes for babies with congenital surgical conditions and inform future design of neonatal care systems.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022329090.

Management of the CDH patient on ECLS

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is the most common indication for respiratory extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in neonates. The survival rate of CDH neonates treated with ECLS is 50%, and this figure has remained relatively stable over the last few decades. This is likely because the current population of CDH neonates who require ECLS have a higher risk profile [1]. The management of neonates with CDH has evolved over time to emphasize postnatal stabilization, gentle ventilation, and multi-modal treatment of pulmonary hypertension. In order to minimize practice variation, many centers have adopted CDH-specific clinical practice guidelines, however care is not standardized between different centers and outcomes vary [3]. The purpose of this review is to summarize our current understanding of issues central to the care of neonates with CDH treated with ECLS and specifically highlight how the use of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) data have added to our understanding of CDH.