Minimally Invasive Surgery for Resectable Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Nationwide Analysis

Clinicopathological characteristics of adrenocortical carcinoma in the Kyushu-Okinawa area of Japan

OBJECTIVE

Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare condition, with limited comprehensive reports from Japan. This study aimed to review Japan's data on adrenocortical carcinoma by assessing information from 46 patients-with adrenocortical carcinoma across 10 Japanese university hospitals.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional analysis of the clinical characteristics of adrenocortical carcinoma in Japan. We evaluated data from 46 patients across 10 university hospitals over 10 years and analyzed the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival.

RESULTS

Five- and 10-year overall survival rates were 59% and 53%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly different among the tumor-node-metastasis system for adrenocortical carcinoma of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer, with the worst prognosis in stage IV (p = 0.0044). In our cohort, neither the Weiss score nor the Ki-67 proliferation index correlated with overall survival. Adjuvant treatment did not yield improved overall survival, whereas resection of the primary tumor in stage IV disease was significantly associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.0262). Out of the cases evaluated for plasma hormones, plasma cortisol, aldosterone, testosterone, and DHEA-S levels were measured at 23%, 42%, 29%, and 62%, respectively, demonstrating higher levels than the upper normal limits.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage IV adrenocortical carcinoma had a poor prognosis; however, resection of the primary tumor in stage IV disease was associated with prolonged survival. The results of this study are expected to contribute to future treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma in Japan.

Laparoscopic surgery for adrenocortical carcinoma: Estimating the risk of margin-positive resection

BACKGROUND

Over recent years, there has been increasing adoption of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). However, MIS has been associated with noncurative resection and locoregional recurrence. We aimed to identify risk factors for margin-positivity among patients who undergo MIS resection for ACC. We hypothesized that a simple nomogram can accurately identify patients most suitable for curative MIS resection.

METHODS

Curative-intent resections for ACC were identified through the National Cancer Database spanning 2010-2018. Trends in MIS utilization were reported using Pearson correlation coefficients. Factors associated with margin-positive resection were identified among preoperatively available variables using multivariable logistic regression, then incorporated into a predictive model. Model quality was cross validated using an 80% training data set and 20% test data set.

RESULTS

Among 1260 ACC cases, 38.6% (486) underwent MIS resection. MIS utilization increased over time at nonacademic centers (R = 0.818, p = 0.007), but not at academic centers (R = 0.009, p = 0.982). Factors associated with margin-positive MIS resection were increasing age, nonacademic center (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, p = 0.006), cT3 (OR: 4.7, p < 0.001) or cT4 tumors (OR: 14.6, p < 0.001), and right-sided tumors (OR: 2.0, p = 0.006). A predictive model incorporating these four factors produced favorable c-statistics of 0.75 in the training data set and 0.72 in the test data set. A pragmatic nomogram was created to enable bedside risk stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

An increasing proportion of ACC are resected via minimally invasive operations, particularly at nonacademic centers. Patient selection based on a few key factors can minimize the risk of noncurative surgery.

Defining Optimal Management of Non-metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an aggressive, deadly malignancy. Resection remains the primary treatment; however, there is conflicting evidence regarding the optimal approach to and extent of surgery and the role of adjuvant therapy. We evaluated the impact of surgical technique and adjuvant therapies on survival in non-metastatic ACC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of subjects who underwent surgery for non-metastatic ACC between 2010 and 2019 utilizing the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival. Cox proportional hazards models were developed to identify associations between clinical and treatment characteristics and survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 1175 subjects were included. Their mean age was 54 ± 15 years, and 62% of patients were female. 67% of procedures were performed via the open approach, 22% involved multi-organ resection, and 26% included lymphadenectomy. Median survival was 77.1 months. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.019; p < 0.001), advanced stage (stage III HR 2.421; p < 0.001), laparoscopic approach (HR 1.329; p = 0.010), and positive margins (HR 1.587; p < 0.001) were negatively associated with survival, while extent of resection (HR 1.189; p = 0.140) and lymphadenectomy (HR 1.039; p = 0.759) had no association. Stratified by stage, laparoscopic resection was only associated with worse survival in stage III disease (HR 1.548; p = 0.007). Chemoradiation was only associated with improved survival in patients with positive resection margins (HR 0.475; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Tumor biology and surgical margins are the primary determinants of survival in non-metastatic ACC. Surgical extent and lymphadenectomy are not associated with overall survival. In advanced disease, the open approach is associated with improved survival.