Intravenous Thrombolysis After Idarucizumab Application in Acute Stroke Patients—A Potentially Increased Sensitivity of Thrombi to Lysis?

Idarucizumab in dabigatran-treated patients with acute stroke: a review and clinical update

Idarucizumab is an antibody fragment specific for the immediate reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation effects. The use of idarucizumab is approved for dabigatran-treated patients suffering from life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding and those in need of urgent surgery or invasive procedures. Data from randomized controlled clinical trials and real-world experience provide reassuring evidence about the efficacy and safety of idarucizmab use in patients with acute stroke. In this narrative review, we summarize the available real-world evidence and discuss the relevance and importance of idarucizumab treatment in acute stroke patients in everyday clinical practice. In addition, we also discuss special issues like prothrombin complex concentrate application as an alternative to idarucizumab, its application before endovascular therapy, sensitivity of thrombi to lysis, and necessary laboratory examinations.

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Recent Ingestion of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Importance

International guidelines recommend avoiding intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with ischemic stroke who have a recent intake of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC).

Objective

To determine the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) associated with use of IVT in patients with recent DOAC ingestion.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 64 primary and comprehensive stroke centers across Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Consecutive adult patients with ischemic stroke who received IVT (both with and without thrombectomy) were included. Patients whose last known DOAC ingestion was more than 48 hours before stroke onset were excluded. A total of 832 patients with recent DOAC use were compared with 32 375 controls without recent DOAC use. Data were collected from January 2008 to December 2021.

Exposures

Prior DOAC therapy (confirmed last ingestion within 48 hours prior to IVT) compared with no prior oral anticoagulation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was sICH within 36 hours after IVT, defined as worsening of at least 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and attributed to radiologically evident intracranial hemorrhage. Outcomes were compared according to different selection strategies (DOAC-level measurements, DOAC reversal treatment, IVT with neither DOAC-level measurement nor idarucizumab). The association of sICH with DOAC plasma levels and very recent ingestions was explored in sensitivity analyses.

Results

Of 33 207 included patients, 14 458 (43.5%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 73 (62-80) years. The median (IQR) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 9 (5-16). Of the 832 patients taking DOAC, 252 (30.3%) received DOAC reversal before IVT (all idarucizumab), 225 (27.0%) had DOAC-level measurements, and 355 (42.7%) received IVT without measuring DOAC plasma levels or reversal treatment. The unadjusted rate of sICH was 2.5% (95% CI, 1.6-3.8) in patients taking DOACs compared with 4.1% (95% CI, 3.9-4.4) in control patients using no anticoagulants. Recent DOAC ingestion was associated with lower odds of sICH after IVT compared with no anticoagulation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92). This finding was consistent among the different selection strategies and in sensitivity analyses of patients with detectable plasma levels or very recent ingestion.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, there was insufficient evidence of excess harm associated with off-label IVT in selected patients after ischemic stroke with recent DOAC ingestion.

Efficacy, Influencing Factors, and Safety of Alteplase Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Combined with Atrial Fibrillation

Ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke. Intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase is currently the most effective method to improve the prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke combined with atrial fibrillation and to analyze the related influencing factors. It turns out, alteplase intravenous thrombolysis is effective for patients with ICS combined with atrial fibrillation, and the incidence of sICH are lower than those without alteplase intravenous thrombolysis, but the efficacy is worse than that of patients without atrial fibrillation. At the same time, the baseline NHISS score and systolic pressure before the thrombolytic were independent risk factors affecting the efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in ICS patients with atrial fibrillation. This study has provided a scientific basis for making an active decision to perform ultraearly intravenous thrombolysis in our hospital to reduce the mortality and disability rate of stroke in the region.

Decision-Making Process for the Management of Acute Stroke in Patients on Oral Anticoagulant: From Guidelines to Clinical Routine

Background: The occurrence of both ischaemic (IS) and haemorrhagic stroke in patients on anticoagulation is a major issue due to the frequency of their prescriptions in westernised countries and the expected impact of anticoagulant activity on recanalization during an IS or on the outcomes associated with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). Several guidelines are available but sometimes differ in their conclusions or regarding specific issues, and their application in routine emergency settings may be limited by particular individual issues or heterogeneous local specificities. Methods: Based on the current guidelines and additional published data, the algorithms proposed in this paper aim to help the decision-making process regarding stroke management in the setting of concurrent anticoagulants by addressing specific clinical situations based on clinical variables commonly encountered in real-world practise. Results: For patients on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, reversion can be achieved with specific antidotes, but only idarucizumab, the specific dabigatran antidote, is indicated in both IS and ICH. Due to the low risk of a prothrombotic effect, idarucizumab can be immediately used in IS patients eligible for thrombolysis before the dabigatran concentration is known. To optimise ICH management, the time since symptom onset, with thresholds proposed at 6 and 9 hours based on the expected timing of haematoma expansion, could also to be taken into account. Conclusions: Anticoagulant reversal in patients presenting with a stroke remains a major issue, and algorithms based on a step-by-step approach may be useful for clinical practise. Real-life studies strongly support the benefits of idarucizumab availability in stroke units and emergency departments.

Ischaemic stroke in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation

Anticoagulation substantially reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, recent studies have shown that up to 22%-36% of patients on anticoagulation will suffer an ischaemic stroke (IS). In this narrative review, we provide an overview of risk factors, mechanisms, management of acute IS and strategies for secondary prevention for patients with AF with stroke despite oral anticoagulation. For this paper, we reviewed available literature from important studies (randomised clinical trials, meta-analyses, reviews and case series) on patients with IS despite anticoagulation. We focused on recent studies that examined safety and efficacy of acute stroke treatments and evaluation and management strategies for secondary prevention. The literature review suggests that patients with AF with IS despite anticoagulation are a heterogeneous group with several possible mechanisms, which may include reduced or non-adherence to anticoagulation, competing non-cardioembolic stroke aetiologies or cardioembolic mechanisms separate from AF. The identification of one or more possible mechanisms of stroke despite anticoagulation may allow for a more targeted and individualised approach for secondary prevention. There are limited data to guide management in such patients, and strategies to prevent recurrent strokes include strict risk factor control and therapies targeting the most likely stroke mechanism. In cases where AF is suspected to be the culprit, clinical trials are needed to test the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion plus anticoagulation versus continued anticoagulation alone.

Point-of-care detection and differentiation of anticoagulant therapy - development of thromboelastometry-guided decision-making support algorithms

Background

DOAC detection is challenging in emergency situations. Here, we demonstrated recently, that modified thromboelastometric tests can reliably detect and differentiate dabigatran and rivaroxaban. However, whether all DOACs can be detected and differentiated to other coagulopathies is unclear. Therefore, we now tested the hypothesis that a decision tree-based thromboelastometry algorithm enables detection and differentiation of all direct Xa-inhibitors (DXaIs), the direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) dabigatran, as well as vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and dilutional coagulopathy (DIL) with high accuracy.

Methods

Following ethics committee approval (No 17–525-4), and registration by the German clinical trials database we conducted a prospective observational trial including 50 anticoagulated patients (n = 10 of either DOAC/VKA) and 20 healthy volunteers. Blood was drawn independent of last intake of coagulation inhibitor. Healthy volunteers served as controls and their blood was diluted to simulate a 50% dilution in vitro. Standard (extrinsic coagulation assay, fibrinogen assay, etc.) and modified thromboelastometric tests (ecarin assay and extrinsic coagulation assay with low tissue factor) were performed. Statistical analyzes included a decision tree analyzes, with depiction of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, as well as receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve analysis including optimal cut-off values (Youden-Index).

Results

First, standard thromboelastometric tests allow a good differentiation between DOACs and VKA, DIL and controls, however they fail to differentiate DXaIs, DTIs and VKAs reliably resulting in an overall accuracy of 78%. Second, adding modified thromboelastometric tests, 9/10 DTI and 28/30 DXaI patients were detected, resulting in an overall accuracy of 94%. Complex decision trees even increased overall accuracy to 98%. ROC curve analyses confirm the decision-tree-based results showing high sensitivity and specificity for detection and differentiation of DTI, DXaIs, VKA, DIL, and controls.

Conclusions

Decision tree-based machine-learning algorithms using standard and modified thromboelastometric tests allow reliable detection of DTI and DXaIs, and differentiation to VKA, DIL and controls.

Trial registration

Clinical trial number: German clinical trials database ID: DRKS00015704.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-021-00313-7.

Intravenous Thrombolysis After Dabigatran Reversal by Idarucizumab: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background and Purpose: Idarucizumab achieves instant reversal of anticoagulation and enables intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in dabigatran-treated acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. AIS in dabigatran-treated patients is a rare event, therefore the experience is limited. A review of all published cases was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this therapeutic strategy. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus for all published cases of IVT after reversal with idarucizumab in dabigatran-treated AIS patients. The outcomes were safety assessed by hemorhagic transformation (HT), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and death, and efficacy assessed by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) reduction. Results: We identified 251 AIS patients (39,9% females) with an average age of 74 years. HT, SICH, and death were reported in 19 (7.6%), 9 (3.6%), and 21 (8.4%) patients, respectively. Patients experiencing HT presented with more severe strokes (median NIHSS on admission: 21 vs. 8, p < 0.001; OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20). After IVT there was a significant NIHSS reduction of 6 points (IQR:3-10, p < 0.001) post-stroke and linear regression revealed a correlation of admission NIHSS to NIHSS reduction (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this systematic review of all published cases of IVT in dabigatran-treated AIS patients after reversal with idarucizumab the rates of HT, SICH and mortality, as well as NIHSS reduction, were comparable with previous studies in non-anticoagulated patients. This provides reassuring evidence about the safety and efficacy of this therapeutic strategy.

Recanalisation therapies for acute ischaemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as primary therapeutic option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, patients may have ischaemic stroke despite DOAC therapy and there is uncertainty whether those patients can safely receive intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. In this review, we summarise and discuss current knowledge about different approaches to select patient. Time since last DOAC intake-as a surrogate for anticoagulant activity-is easy to use but limited by interindividual variability of drug pharmacokinetics and long cut-offs (>48 hours). Measuring anticoagulant activity using drug-specific coagulation assays showed promising safety results. Large proportion of patients at low anticoagulant activity seem to be potentially treatable but there remains uncertainty about exact safe cut-off values and limited assay availability. The use of specific reversal agents (ie, idarucizumab or andexanet alfa) prior to thrombolysis is a new emerging option with first data reporting safety but issues including health economics need to be elucidated. Mechanical thrombectomy appears to be safe without any specific selection criteria applied. In patients on DOAC therapy with large vessel occlusion, decision for intravenous thrombolysis should not delay thrombectomy (eg, direct thrombectomy or immediate transfer to a thrombectomy-capable centre recommended). Precision medicine using a tailored approach combining clinicoradiological information (ie, penumbra and vessel status), anticoagulant activity and use of specific reversal agents only if necessary seems a reasonable choice.

Idarucizumab Reversal of Dabigatran in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage: Comparison with Non-idarucizumab-Treated Patients

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant dabigatran; it is recommended during intravenous thrombolysis treatment of dabigatran-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and in dabigatran-treated patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

Outcomes of consecutive idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with intravenous thrombolysis-treated AIS (n = 22) were compared with consecutive similar intravenous thrombolysis-treated patients with AIS who were not anticoagulated (n = 182) [primary aim]; idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with ICH (n = 13) were compared with patients with ICH who received the anticoagulants rivaroxaban or apixaban (n = 24) [secondary aim]. Efficacy was estimated by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score changes between admission and discharge and by the modified Rankin score after 3 months; safety was assessed by symptomatic ICH and mortality.

RESULTS

Basal neurological impairment was similar in both idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated and control groups of patients with AIS and ICH. The idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with AIS with subsequent intravenous thrombolysis showed a mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement of 84% vs 68% in the control group (p < 0.05). A favorable outcome (modified Rankin score ≤ 2 after 3 months) was achieved significantly more frequently than in the control group (86% vs 57%; p < 0.05). The complication rate was similar in both groups. In patients with ICH, a positive functional outcome (modified Rankin score ≤ 3 after 3 months) was achieved more often in the idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated group than in the control group (70% vs 42%; p = 0.109). The complication rate was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Idarucizumab use in dabigatran-treated patients with AIS resulted in significantly more efficacious intravenous thrombolysis treatment and a non-significantly better outcome in dabigatran-treated patients with ICH compared with controls. There was no difference regarding complications.

Revascularization outcomes following acute ischemic stroke in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants: a single hospital cohort study

Successful revascularization therapy is of paramount importance in patients suffering acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, there is currently only limited evidence on revascularization outcomes for patients suffering AIS while treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical reperfusion (MeR) in AIS patients taking DOACs, and compare them to randomized clinical trials (RCTs), which included patients without DOAC treatment. In an observational cohort study, we analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes following AIS for all consecutive patients on DOAC therapy treated by IVT or MeR, between 2013 and 2019, at the University Medical Center Ljubljana. Patients in the IVT group were on dabigatran treatment and have received idarucizumab as a reversal agent prior to IVT. Patients in the MeR group had a large vessel occlusion. The primary outcome of the study was efficiency, defined as significant improvement after recanalization (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score improvement of ≥8 points after 24 h and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 after 3 months) and safety, defined as occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality. Fifty-one DOAC-treated patients with AIS were included. Nineteen dabigatran-treated patients received IVT after reversal by idarucizumab. Thirty-two patients with a large vessel occlusion (12 on dabigatran, 12 on rivaroxaban, and 8 on apixaban) received MeR. Median NIHSS at admission was 9 in the IVT group and 17 in the MeR group. A significant clinical improvement, 24 h after revascularization (median improvement of NIHSS ≥8), occurred in 84% of patients treated with IVT and 25% of patients treated with MeR. A favorable functional outcome after 3 months (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2) occurred in 84 % of patients treated with IVT and 44% of patients treated with MeR. SICH occurred in one patient (5%) in the IVT group, and in two patients (6%) in the MeR group. In summary, in our observational study of DOAC-treated AIS patients, the level of IVT efficiency was substantially better than in the RCTs. At the same time, the results of MeR treatment were on the same level as in non-DOAC AIS patients included in the RCTs. The observed safety of IVT and MeR treatment was similar to the RCTs. We propose that thrombi in patients on dabigatran may have increased susceptibility to IVT, thereby allowing for better clinical results.

Factors affecting in-hospital delay of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective cohort study

This study was designed to investigate the factors affecting the in-hospital delay of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).Two hundred and forty-eight consecutive AIS patients treated with intravenous administration of alteplase in Gansu Provincial Hospital from December 2014 to August 2018 were enrolled retrospectively in this study. According to door-to-needle (DTN) time, the patients were divided into either a delay group (DTN time > 60 minutes; n = 184) or a non-delay group (DTN time ≤60 minutes; n = 64). The baseline data, laboratory tests, onset-to-door (OTD) time, door-to-accepting time (DTA), door-to-imaging time (DTI), and decision-making time in both groups were recorded. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to analyze the data.There were significant differences in previous history of cerebral ischemic attack, emergency system admission, education degree of decision makers, annual income, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), OTD time, DTA time, decision-making time between the 2 groups (all P < .05). Other baseline data and clinical features showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P > .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of in-hospital delay was lower for the higher NIHSS score (OR = 0.775, 95% CI: 0.644-0.933, P = .007), the longer OTD time (OR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.937-0.991, P = .010), the shorter decision-making time (OR = 1.224, 95% CI: 1.004-1.492, P = .045).This study suggested that NIHSS score, OTD time and decision-making time are the independent factors affecting the in-hospital delay of IVT for AIS.