Influence of Platelet Aggregate Formation in Blood Samples on Light Transmission Aggregometry Results

Prolonged platelet hyperactivity after COVID-19 infection

Platelet hyperactivity often occurs in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, it remains unclear how long platelet hyperactivity lasts after the acute phase, owing to a lack of follow-up studies. To elucidate the course of platelet hyperactivity, we serially measured platelet activity in patients with COVID-19 up to 40 days after hospital admission using an easily assessable haematology analyser that semi-quantitates platelet clumps on a scattergram. Our results showed that platelet hyperactivity persisted for at least 40 days even after acute inflammation subsided in most patients with COVID-19, regardless of disease severity. Persistent platelet hyperactivity may contribute to thromboembolic complications in post-COVID-19 patients.

Antiplatelet Loading Effects Prior to Endovascular Treatment: Carotid Artery Stenosis versus Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms

Objective

Carotid artery stenosis and cerebral aneurism may have different platelet functions and antiplatelet responses because these diseases have different etiologies. In this study, we compared the antiplatelet loading effects prior to endovascular treatment between carotid artery stenosis and unruptured cerebral aneurysm (UCA) patients.

Methods

Nine patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACS), 14 with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (SCS), and 20 with unruptured cerebral aneurysms were enrolled in this study. Antiplatelet (aspirin + clopidogrel) loading effects prior to endovascular treatment were evaluated using light transmission aggregometry and platelet aggregate detection methods.

Results

Although there are differences in the prevalence of atherosclerosis risk factors, maximum aggregation rates in light transmission aggregometry and platelet aggregation-prone properties were not different in the three disease groups.

Conclusion

Preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel may be appropriate for both carotid artery stenosis and cerebral aneurism patients even though their conditions and background factors differ.

Inhibitory Effects of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist on PAR1- and PAR4-AP-Induced Platelet Aggregation in Patients with Stroke or TIA

OBJECTIVES

The inhibitory effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonist on PAR1- and PAR4-activating peptide (AP)-induced platelet aggregation have not been fully elucidated. The present study aimed to investigate the inhibitory effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonist on PAR1- and PAR4-AP-induced platelet aggregation using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from individuals including patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PRP was given to 10 healthy individuals pretreated in vitro with cangrelor, then stimulated with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), PAR4-AP, or PAR1-AP. Moreover, 20 patients were enrolled from 148 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA admitted to our institute between December 2017 and April 2019. PRP obtained from each patient before and >7 days after initiation of clopidogrel was similarly stimulated with these agonists. Platelet aggregation was measured using an automatic coagulation analyzer in all participants.

RESULTS

In healthy individuals, ADP- and PAR4-AP-induced platelet aggregations were significantly inhibited depending on the cangrelor concentration in vitro, while PAR1-AP-induced platelet aggregation was slightly inhibited. In patients with stroke or TIA, clopidogrel inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation at all concentrations, and significantly inhibited PAR4-AP-induced platelet aggregation at 50 µmol/L of PAR4-AP (p<0.05), especially in 5 patients who showed high reactivity to PAR4-AP. PAR1-AP-induced platelet aggregation was also slightly inhibited.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed significant inhibitory effects on PAR4-AP-induced platelet aggregation by clopidogrel in patients with stroke or TIA who had high reactivity to PAR4-AP.

Point-of-care platelet function tests: relevance to arterial thrombosis and opportunities for improvement

Studies using whole blood platelet aggregometry as a laboratory research tool, provided important insights into the mechanism and modulators of platelet aggregation. Subsequently, a number of point-of-care (POC) platelet function tests (PFTs) were developed for clinical use, based on the concept that an individual’s thrombotic profile could be assessed in vitro by assessing the response to stimulation of platelet aggregation by specific, usually solo agonists such as adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen and thrombin. However, adjusting antiplatelet medication in order to improve the results of such POC PFTs has not translated into a meaningful reduction in cardiovascular events, which may be attributable to important differences between the POC PFT techniques and in vivo conditions, including patient-to-patient variability. Important limitations of most tests include the use of citrate-anticoagulated blood. Citrate directly and irreversibly diminishes platelet function and even after recalcification, it may result in altered platelet aggregation in response to ADP, epinephrine or collagen, and interfere with thrombin generation from activated platelets. Furthermore, most tests do not employ flowing blood and therefore do not assess the effect of high shear forces on platelets that initiate, propagate and stabilize arterial thrombi. Finally, the effect of endogenous thrombolysis, due to fibrinolysis and dislodgement, which ultimately determines the outcome of a thrombotic stimulus, is mostly not assessed. In order to accurately reflect an individual’s predisposition to arterial thrombosis, future tests of thrombotic status which overcome these limitations should be used, to improve cardiovascular risk prediction and to guide pharmacotherapy.