Mechanical thrombectomy in stroke in nonagenarians: useful or futile?

Predictors of futile recanalization in nonagenarians treated with mechanical thrombectomy: a multi-center observational study

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data regarding patients aged 90 years or older undergoing mechanical thrombectomy and their predictors of futile recanalization.

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the predictors of futile recanalization in patients ≥ 90 years with large vessel occlusion undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS

This multi-center observational retrospective study included patients ≥ 90 years consecutively treated with mechanical thrombectomy in four thrombectomy capable centers between January 1st, 2016 and 30th March 2023. Futile recanalization was defined as large vessel occlusion patients experiencing a 90-day poor outcome (mRS 3-6) despite successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b) after mechanical thrombectomy.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 139 patients ≥ 90 years with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy. One hundred seventeen of one hundred thirty-nine patients ≥ 90 years who achieved successful recanalization were included in the analysis (seventy-six female (64.9%)), of whom thirty-one (26.49%) experienced effective recanalization and eighty-six (73.51%) experienced futile recanalization. Patients with futile recanalization had higher NIHSS on admission (p < 0.001); they were less frequently treated with intravenous thrombolysis (p = 0.048), had more often general anesthesia (p = 0.011), and longer door to groin puncture delay (p = 0.002). Univariable regression analysis showed that use of intravenous thrombolysis (0.29, 95% CI 0.02-0.79, p = 0.034) and site of occlusion distal vs proximal (0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.97, p = 0.044) were associated with reduced probability of futile recanalization while NIHSS on admission (1.29, 95% CI 1.16-1.45, p < 0.001), NIHSS at 24 h (1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.25, p = 0.002), type of anesthesia used (4.18, 95% CI 1.57-11.08, p = 0.004), and door to groin puncture time (1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05, p = 0.005) were associated with increased probability of futile recanalization. Multivariable regression analysis showed that use of intravenous thrombolysis (0.44, 95% CI 0.09-0.88, p = 0.039) was associated with reduced probability of futile recanalization.

CONCLUSION

Our study seems to suggest that mechanical thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis is associated with reduced probability of futile recanalization in a multi-center cohort of patients aged 90 years or older.

Efficacy and Safety of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Elderly and Non-Elderly Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is recommended for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. However, most of the studies that investigated the superiority of MT over best medical management (BMM) alone included preponderantly non-elderly patients. Thus, there is uncertainty in relation to the efficacy of MT in the elderly. We aim to compare the effect of BMM to BMM plus MT among elderly and non-elderly patients with LVO.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of medical databases from inception to April 2023 to identify randomized studies that reported the functional outcome at 90 days by age for patients with LVO treated with MT versus BMM. Patients were divided into elderly (>70 or >80 years, depending on the cutoff used in each study) and non-elderly. Outcomes were defined as excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≤1), good (mRS ≤3), poor (mRS ≥5), or death. Effect sizes were calculated by using random effects meta-analyses. Results were represented by odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 2,195 patients were included in the analysis (≥70 years, 7 trials, n = 696; ≥80 years, 2 trials, n = 139). Non-elderly patients treated with MT had higher odds of excellent outcome (OR: 3.05; 95% CI: 2.23-4.18) and good outcome (OR: 2.70; 95% CI: 1.94-3.74), and lower odds of poor outcome (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.40-0.72) and death (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.41-0.96). Similarly, elderly patients treated with MT had higher odds of excellent (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.05-5.45) and good outcomes (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.43-3.33) and lower odds of poor outcome (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33-0.70) and mortality (OR: 0.50; 0.26-0.95). When outcomes were analyzed by age subgroups, MT was associated with higher odds of good outcome in patients ≥70 years (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.26-3.03) and ≥80 years (OR: 4.43, 95% CI: 1.02-19.23).

CONCLUSION

MT increases the likelihood of achieving a good outcome in elderly and non-elderly patients without increasing the risk of severe disability or death. MT, when otherwise clinically indicated, should be considered over BMM alone in both age groups.

Current advances in endovascular treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the most beneficial reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Currently, much effort is done to promote trials examining EVT efficacy and safety in various conditions not included in the main randomized controlled trials established the superiority of EVT. This review summarizes the current advances of EVT patients' selection and periprocedural management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence points to beneficial effect of EVT among patients with relatively large ischemic core, premorbid independent nonagenarians and basilar artery occlusion, and suggest that intravenous thrombolysis bridging treatment is associated with better reperfusion rates. Ongoing trials currently examine EVT efficacy and safety in distal vessel occlusions and in large vessel occlusion with low NIHSS. Current evidence also support use of general anaesthesia and avoid postprocedural extremely low or high blood pressure as well as haemodynamic instability.

SUMMARY

The field of EVT is rapidly evolving. The results of recent trials have dramatically increased the indications for EVT, with many ongoing trials examining further indications.

Endovascular thrombectomy is beneficial for functional nonagenarians - a multicenter cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has dramatically increased in recent years. However, most existing studies used an upper age limit of 80 and data regarding the safety and efficacy of EVT among nonagenarians is still lacking.

METHODS

767 consecutive patients undergoing EVT for large vessel occlusion (LVO) in three participating centers were recruited into a prospective ongoing database. Demographic, clinical and imaging characteristics were documented. Statistical analysis was done to evaluate EVT outcome among nonagenarians compared to younger patients.

RESULTS

The current analysis included 41 (5.4%) patients older than 90 years. Compared to younger patients, nonagenarians were more often female (78% versus 50.3%, p ≤ 0.001), had worse baseline mRS scores (2 [0-3] versus 0 [0-2], p < 0.001), higher rates of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and a higher admission NIHSS (20 [14-23] versus 16 [11-20], p < 0.001). No differences were found between groups regarding the involved vessel, stroke etiology, time from symptoms to door or symptoms to EVT, successful recanalization rates and hemorrhagic transformation rates. Nonagenarians had worse mRS at 90 days (5 [3-6] versus 3 [2-5], p = 0.001), similar discharge NIHSS (5 [1-11] versus 4 [1-11], p = 0.78) and higher mortality rates (36.6% versus 15.8%, p < 0.001). All nonagenarians with baseline mRS 4 have died within 90 days. 36.4% of nonagenarian patients with baseline MRS of 3 or less had favorable outcome.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that nonagenarian stroke patients with baseline mRS of 3 or less benefit from EVT with no significant difference in the rate of favorable outcome compared to octogenarians.

Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in Nonagenarians: A 10-Year Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Nonagenarians have been underrepresented in stroke trials that established endovascular treatment as the standard for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Evidence remains inconclusive regarding the efficacy of thrombectomy in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To report our experience with thrombectomy in nonagenarians with stroke, and to identify predictors of mortality. We further investigated the effects of first-pass reperfusion and the addition of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on achieving better outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was collected for consecutively treated patients at three affiliated comprehensive stroke centers from 2010 to 2021. We included patients ≥90 years-old with AIS secondary to large vessel occlusion. Bivariate analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and χ² and Fisher's exact tests, respectively, for nominal and ordinal variables.

RESULTS

Thirty-two nonagenarians underwent thrombectomy, of whom 25 (81%) had prestroke mRS ≤2. Thrombectomies were performed using stents (2, 6.7%), aspiration (8, 26.7%), or a combination of both (20, 66.7%). Successful recanalization was achieved in 97%. Procedural complications occurred in 2 (6.3%) and intracranial hemorrhage in 3 (9.4%). Sixteen patients (50%) were discharged home or to rehabilitation, 9 (28.2%) to nursing home or hospice, and 7 (21.9%) died during hospitalization. Only 2 (6%) patients had mRS ≤2 at discharge. No independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were identified, and neither first-pass reperfusion nor the addition of IVT correlated with improvement in clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Although thrombectomy is safe for nonagenarian stroke and can achieve excellent recanalization, high mortality and poor functional status remain high given the advanced age and frailty of this population.

Thrombectomy in special populations: report of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Standards and Guidelines Committee

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this guideline is to summarize the data available for performing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) stroke in special populations not typically included in large randomized controlled clinical trials, including children, the elderly, pregnant women, patients who have recently undergone surgery, and patients with thrombocytopenia, collagen vascular disorders, and endocarditis.

METHODS

We performed a literature review for studies examining the indications, efficacy, and outcomes for patients undergoing MT for ischemic stroke aged <18 years and >80 years, pregnant patients, patients who have recently undergone surgery, and those with thrombocytopenia, collagen vascular diseases, or endocarditis. We graded the quality of the evidence.

RESULTS

MT can be effective for the treatment of ELVO in ischemic stroke for patients over age 80 years and under age 18 years, thrombocytopenic patients, pregnant patients, and patients with endocarditis. While outcomes are worse compared to younger patients and those with normal platelet counts (respectively), there is still a benefit in the elderly (in both mRS and mortality). Data are very limited for patients with collagen vascular diseases; although diagnostic cerebral angiography carries increased risks, MT may be appropriate in carefully selected patients in whom untreated ELVO would likely result in disabling or fatal outcome.

Feasibility of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Aged 90 Years or Older Compared to Younger Patients

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a proven treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the efficacy of this treatment is uncertain for very elderly patients. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of MT in 90 years or older patients compared with younger patients. We retrospectively reviewed AIS patients treated with MT between October 2018 and June 2020 in our institution. Patients were divided into two groups: aged ≥90 and <90 years. We compared the following factors: functional outcome at discharge, in-hospital death, successful recanalization, and complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the good functional outcome was performed. In consideration of pre-stroke basic activities of very elderly patients, we defined the good functional outcome as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–3. In all, 66 patients were included, and 19 patients (28%) were ≥90 years old. Pre-stoke mRS was higher in ≥90-year-old patients (p = 0.01). In ≥90-year-old patients, we achieved successful recanalization in 17 patients (90%), and only one patient experienced hemorrhagic complication related with the procedure. The good functional outcome (mRS: 0–3) at discharge were six patients (32%) in ≥90 years old versus 19 patients (40%) in <90 years old (p = 0.6). Three patients died in hospital in each group (16% versus 6%) (p = 0.3). Only the stroke severity was negatively related with the good functional outcome in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, for ≥90-year-old patients compared with younger patients, MT is an equally feasible therapy. Patients should not be excluded from MT based on age alone.