Thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window: Real-life experience in a high-volume center

Safety and clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy versus medical management in late presentation of large ischemic stroke

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) among stroke patients with large ischemic core (ASPECTS 0-5) in the extended time window outside of trial settings remains unclear. We analyzed the effect of EVT among these stroke patients in real-world settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion (CLEAR) study recruited patients from 66 centers in 10 countries between 01/2014 and 05/2022. The extended time-window was defined as 6-24 h from last-seen-well to treatment. The primary outcome was shift of the 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Outcomes were analyzed with ordinal and logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Among 5098 screened patients, 2451 were included in the analysis (median age 73, 55% women). Of patients with ASPECTS 0-5 (n = 310), receiving EVT (n = 209/310) was associated with lower 3-month mRS when compared to medical management (median 4 IQR 3-6 vs 6 IQR 4-6; aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7). Patients undergoing EVT had higher sICH (11.2% vs 4.0%; aOR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-18.8) and lower mortality (31.6% vs 58.4%, aOR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.9) compared to medically managed patients. The relative benefit of EVT was comparable between patients with ASPECTS 0 and 5 and 6-10 in the extended time window (interaction aOR 0.9; 95% CI 0.5-1.7).

CONCLUSION

In the extended time window, patients with ASPECTS 0-5 may have preserved relative treatment benefit of EVT compared to patients with ASPECTS 6-10. These findings are in line with recent trials showing benefit of EVT among real-world patients with large ischemic core in the extended time window.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04096248.

Endovascular thrombectomy for DAWN- and DEFUSE-3 ineligible acute ischemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been proven beneficial for treating acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Recent trials of DAWN and DEFUSE-3 have extended the treatment window to 6-24 h, sparking investigations into EVT outcomes for patients not eligible for DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria.

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for late-window anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke patients, comparing DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and ineligible (NDND) groups.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined EVT outcomes for patients with late-window anterior circulation LVO beyond 6 h. We categorized patients as DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and ineligible (NDND). Our search covered PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. A total of 464 records were initially identified. After duplicate removal, 298 studies were screened. Nine studies were included and analyzed. Our analysis focused on study characteristics, baseline comparisons, risk of bias, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics showed comparable age, gender, most comorbidities, NIHSS score, and ASPECTS between DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and ineligible (NDND) patients. NDND patients' history showed a higher rate of atrial fibrillation and larger infarct volumes on baseline imaging. Successful reperfusion rates (TICI 2b-3) were similar between DD and NDND with 354 out of 469 in the DD group and 364 out of 459 in the NDND group (OR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.40, 1.84; p = 0.689), though with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 73%; P = 0.002). The proportion of patients with distal occlusions was significantly higher in the NDND group as compared to the DD group (137 (39.4%) of 347 patients versus 47 (11%) of 428 patients, respectively), with significant heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 85%, p = 0.023). Functional independence at 90 days (mRS 0-2) showed no significant difference between groups with 259 out of 802 in the DD group and 197 out of 668 in the NDND group (OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.77, 1.63; p = 0.552) but also exhibited notable heterogeneity (I2 = 46%, p = 0.063). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates were lower in DD with 14 out of 309 in the DD group and 47 out of 400 in NDND group (OR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.25, 0.93; p = 0.029) as compared to the NDND patients, showing no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.552). 90-day mortality was lower in DD with 43 out of 304 in the DD group and 107 out of 399 in the NDND group (OR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.37, 0.82; p = 0.004) as compared to NDND patients, with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.536).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates equivalent rates of functional independence between DD and NDND patients. However, the high proportion of distal occlusions and higher rates of sICH and mortality in NDND patients suggest caution in offering mechanical thrombectomy to DAWN/DEFUSE-3 ineligible patients. A more flexible approach to EVT eligibility criteria could benefit select patients in real-world practice. Nonetheless, further research is needed to identify which patients would benefit from expanded EVT eligibility criteria.

Hemiplegia in acute ischemic stroke: A comprehensive review of case studies and the role of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy

Acute ischemic stroke is a significant health concern worldwide, often leading to long-term disability and decreased quality of life. Rapid and appropriate treatment is crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in these patients. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are two commonly used interventions for acute ischemic stroke, but their effectiveness in improving neurological symptoms and functional outcomes in patients with hemiplegia remains uncertain. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of IVT and MT within a 4.5-h time frame on patients with acute ischemic stroke and hemiplegia. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies that assessed the impact of IVT and MT within 4.5-h on hemiplegia in patients with an acute ischemic stroke were included. Data were extracted and analyzed to determine the overall effects of these interventions. Most included case reports indicate positive outcomes in terms of neurological symptom improvement and functional recovery in patients with hemiplegia after receiving IVT and MT within the specified time frame. However, the heterogeneity among the patients and the limited use of IVT due to contraindications posed challenges in determining the most effective treatment option. The findings from the included studies demonstrate that both interventions led to a decrease in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, indicating an improvement in neurological symptoms. The results highlight the beneficial effects of early thrombolytic interventions and MT on the neurological status and functional outcomes of patients with an acute ischemic stroke.

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: An Evolution of Trials

The last decade's progress in demonstrating the clinical benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke has transformed the paradigm of care for these patients. This review presents the milestones in implementing EVT as standard of care, demonstrates the current state of evidence, provides guidance for identifying the candidate patient for EVT, and highlights unsolved and controversial issues. Ongoing trials investigate broadening of EVT indications for patients who present with large core infarction, adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis, medium vessel occlusion, low NIHSS, and tandem occlusion.

Improving the Prognosis of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated in the Late Time Window After the Introduction of Advanced Imaging Software: Benefits From Thrombectomy in the Extended Time Window

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of ischemic stroke was recommended as a clinical guideline in 2015, and the indication for time was expanded in 2018 based on two clinical studies. We aimed to compare and analyze the prognosis of patients treated under the extended time indication before and after the introduction of advanced software.

METHODS

We obtained data from medical records between 2016 to 2020. From 2016 to 2017, patients who did not receive MT who visited the hospital within 24 hours from the last normal time (LNT) were classified as standard medical treatment (SMT) group. Among patients who underwent MT between 2019 and 2020, patients who visited the hospital between 6-24 hours from the LNT were classified into the extended MT (EMT) group. Good outcome was defined as 3-months modified rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 2, and a poor outcome as mRS ≥ 4.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2017, 1,058 patients were hospitalized for ischemic stroke, of which 60 (5.7%) received MT, and 27 patients were classified into the SMT group. Among 1,019 patients between 2019 and 2020, 85 (8.3%) received MT, and 24 patients were in the EMT group. Among the SMT group, only 3 had a good prognosis, and 24 (88.9%) had a poor prognosis. However, in the EMT group, 10 (41.7%) had a good prognosis, and 9 (37.5%) had a poor prognosis. The SMT group had a 49.1 times higher risk of poor prognosis compared to the EMT group (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

The number of patients with ischemic stroke who receive MT has increased by using advanced imaging software. It was confirmed that patients treated based on the extended time indication also had a good prognosis.