Radiation safety knowledge and practices among urology residents and fellows: results of a nationwide survey

Do urologists actually comply with the ALARA principle in pediatric urolithiasis management?

The purpose of the study was to determine the urologists' knowledge of ionizing radiation and the frequency of CT scan utilization for pediatric patients with urolithiasis. The second aim is to examine the factors that affect the choice of the CT imaging method in these patients. We sent a quantitative online questionnaire to urologists and pediatric urologists in various regions and practice settings of Turkey via a web survey database in June 2022. The survey consisted of 22 items in a multiple-choice or yes/no format and was divided into three sections: participant characteristics, knowledge, and current practice. One hundred and fifty-four participants fully completed this questionnaire. Forty-two participants (27.3%) correctly stated the radiation dose of an abdominal CT scan. Thirty of the participants (19.5%) thought that there was no relationship between exposure to radiation and cancer development. In addition, 76 participants (49.4%) were aware of any scientific literature about this relationship. Ninety-eight participants (63.6%) think that they did not receive adequate training on imaging methods for pediatric patients during their residency program. The choice of CT scans as the first imaging method was increased with age. Even if the choice of imaging method is mostly decided according to the guidelines, various factors such as medicolegal causes, long ultrasound appointment dates, poor quality of assessment, and clinical experiences are inevitable facts that guide the choice of computed tomography. Urologists are responsible for knowing the effects of ionizing radiation and the ALARA principle. Our findings emphasize the lack of knowledge about ionizing radiation. Encouragement of the literature, provision of the mandatory curriculum, and supervision of the use of ionizing radiation will contribute to the elimination of the deficiency in this area.

Ocular radiation exposure is negligible in normal volume endourological practice

INTRODUCTION

The annual dose limit for radiation exposure to the eye has been reduced recently; the eye is widely recognised as one of the most radiosensitive tissues in the body. There is minimal good quality research as to the radiation dose that the eye receives during endourological surgery and this study aimed to address this.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed over an 8-month period at a single large teaching hospital in the UK. Three index procedures were included: ureteric stent insertion, ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Surgeons wore a dosimeter on the glabella with fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP) recorded for each case.

RESULTS

A total of 404 procedures were included (247 URSs, 150 ureteric stent insertions and 7 PCNLs). Dosimeters were worn by ten surgeons. Mean FTs (URS 20.56s; ureteric stent 18.96s; PCNL 360.67s) and mean DAP (URS 100.82cGy/m2, ureteric stent 119.82cGy/m2 and PCNL 1121.62cGy/m2) were identified with significant intersurgeon variability. No surgeon had a total dosimeter dose >0.00mSv.

CONCLUSIONS

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recently reduced the yearly eye dose limit from 150 to 20mSv. Cataractogenesis is no longer considered a typical deterministic effect, with a threshold level below which no effect occurs. Even in higher volume centres, these annual limits are unlikely to be reached. Lead glasses may be considered for surgeons and radiologists with the highest exposure but, for the majority, ocular radiation exposure is negligible.

Operating room radiation safety measures: Awareness, compliance, and perceived risks among nurses and other healthcare workers

AIM

This study evaluates and compares nurses' and other healthcare workers' awareness of and compliance with radiation protection measures in operating rooms and their perceived susceptibility to occupational illness due to radiation exposure.

BACKGROUND

Compliance with radiation safety measures minimises occupational radiation exposure risks. Understanding the role of perceived susceptibility to occupational illness in motivating compliance and awareness can enhance safety interventions.

METHODS

Using a questionnaire-based cross-sectional observational design, this study targeted nurses, physicians, and radiologic technologists working in Saudi Arabian operating rooms. The survey measured awareness of and compliance with radiation protection measures and perceived susceptibility to occupational illness. The STROBE checklist was followed to ensure methodological rigour.

RESULTS

Nurses demonstrated the lowest awareness and compliance, and the highest perceived susceptibility to occupational illnesses compared to other healthcare professionals. There was a moderate positive correlation between increased awareness of safety measures and compliance, but a weaker correlation between adherence and perceived risk.

DISCUSSION

Nurses' compliance and awareness did not align with their risk perceptions, suggesting a cognitive-behavioural gap in which stronger risk perceptions among nurses do not lead to proactive protective behaviours. This discrepancy may be attributed to the demanding nature of nursing duties, which often overshadow strict adherence to safety protocols.

CONCLUSION

The study identified significant disparities in radiation safety practices, with nurses demonstrating less awareness and compliance but higher risk perceptions than other healthcare professionals. Interventions are needed to bridge the gap between perceived risk and actual safety behaviours.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY

Role-specific training programmes and continuous education are needed to enhance radiation safety practices among nurses. Policies must support these educational efforts, ensuring that nurses can balance patient care responsibilities with radiation protection measures.

Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review

This review aims to identify and analyze the instruments employed for assessing the overall performance of workers exposed to fluoroscopy during surgical procedures and/or interventional procedures, using the PRISMA methodology. The studies were located through searches conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Lilacs, ScienceDirect, B-ON, EBSCOhost, and EBSCO Discovery Service on March 27, 2023. Additional studies were identified using backward and forward citation techniques. The PEO strategic model was followed. The search spanned studies published between 2012 and 2022. The quality of the studies underwent assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Out of the 23 studies identified, encompassing 3604 individuals, 12 (52%) addressed the reliability and/or validity of the instruments, while 3 (13%) focused on the development and psychometric testing of the instruments. Only 5 instruments (23%), validated and reliable, exclusively evaluated occupational radiological protection. The predominant dimension covered was knowledge (82%, n = 19). The population was assessed in 18 studies, pre- and post-intervention in 2 studies, and 21 studies provided recommendations or tools for improvement. Individuals in the studies utilized passive dosimeters (ranging from 5% to 98%), thyroid shields (15% to 98%), and aprons or lead skirts/coats (28% to 99%). The evidence quality was moderate (6/8). This study underscores the imperative to enhance compliance with protective and monitoring equipment. Furthermore, additional information is warranted concerning the validity and reliability of the instruments used, as well as the development of instruments that are both valid and reliable.

Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures

BACKGROUND

Fluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures. Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers. Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided spinal interventions.

DESIGN

Single-center, observational study.

SETTING

Outpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Resident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Machine-indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]).

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs. For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime  = 24.5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.4-28.7; meandose  = 3.53 mGy, CI = 2.57-4.49) compared to when they observed (meantime  = 9.9 s, CI = 8.1-11.7; meandose  = 1.28 mGy, CI = 0.98-1.59) (mean difference: time = 14.63 s, CI = 9.31-19.94; dose = 2.25 mGy, CI = 1.17-3.33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime  = 12.9 s, CI = 11.1-14.6; meandose  = 1.65 mGy, CI = 1.40-1.89) (mean difference: time = 11.67 s, CI = 7.35-15.98; dose = 1.88 mGy, CI = 1.01-2.76). In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime  = 39.1 s, CI = 30.7-47.6; meandose  = 6.73 mGy, CI = 3.39-10.07) compared to when they were absent (meantime  = 27.1 s, CI = 22.4-31.8; meandose  = 4.41 mGy, CI = 3.06-5.76 (mean difference: time = 11.99 s, CI = 1.37-22.61; dose = 2.32 mGy, CI = -1.20-5.84). Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime  = .032, pdose  = .74) and cervical FBs (ptime  = .64, pdose  = .68).

CONCLUSION

Resident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.

A standardised communication tool reduces radiation exposure associated with intraoperative fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND

The widespread use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in orthopaedic procedures has revolutionised surgical practice. However, there are risks associated with using ionising radiation. Efforts to reduce radiation exposure include low-dose imaging protocols and lead protective equipment. Current communication during fluoroscopic procedures can be inefficient and lead to excessive radiation exposure for patients and staff.

AIMS

This study aims to implement a communication tool with standardised commands to reduce radiation exposure in an Irish orthopaedic department.

METHODS

Radiation exposure was evaluated using dose-area product (DAP) measured in uGy/m2. A control group was recorded before implementing the communication tool. Training sessions were conducted and posters of the standardised commands were displayed. Feedback was collected from surgeons and radiographers via surveys. Statistical analysis was performed to compare pre- and post-intervention groups.

RESULTS

A total of 673 surgical cases were included over 6 months. The post-intervention group showed a mean reduction in radiation exposure from 59.8 to 36.4 uGy/m2 (p < 0.011). Subset analyses revealed reduced radiation exposure for ORIF of the distal radius, ankle, humerus, and phalanges. Surgeons and radiographers recognised the need for improved communication and expressed willingness to learn the new tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a standardised communication tool effectively reduced patient and staff radiation exposure. It was also believed to have a positive effect on theatre staff morale. Incorporating a universal language tool into training programmes could be beneficial. Surgeons and radiographers provided several suggestions to improve the effectiveness and implementation of this tool into other units.

Training ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy technique with porcine model

PURPOSE

There is increasing interest in the use of ultrasound for endoscopic and percutaneous procedures. Access can be achieved without radiation exposure under ultrasound guidance. Our aim was to develop a porcine-based training model for ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal access that could also be personalized to a specific patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Severance Hospital approved the study protocol. An anesthetized pig was placed in the dorsal lithotomy position. For the nephrostomy puncture, a Chiba biopsy needle with an echo tip was used under ultrasound guidance. Eight residents and three consultants in urology participated. Puncture time was defined as the nephrostomy time to confirm the flow of irrigation via the needle. After training, satisfaction survey results for clinical usability and procedural difficulty were evaluated.

RESULTS

The 5-point Likert scale satisfaction survey for clinical usability and procedural difficulty found mean results of 4.64 and 4.09 points, respectively. There were no differences between residents and consultants for either variable. For all participants combined, there was a significant difference for nephrostomy time between the first and second trials (278.8±70.6 s vs. 244.5±47.0 s; p=0.007). The between-trial difference was greater for residents (291.5±71.2 s vs. 259.1±41.9 s; p=0.039). The difference for the consultant was not significant (245.0±69.4 s vs. 205.7±42.5 s; p=0.250).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a porcine-based ultrasound-guided nephrostomy puncture training model. Satisfaction survey results indicated high clinical usability and procedural difficulty. For nephrostomy time, the model was more effective for urology residents than for consultants.

Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator

Objectives

To review radiation exposure during emergency ureteric stent insertion to identify differences based on operator experience, specialty operator and stone characteristics.

Patients and methods

A retrospective audit over 10 years was performed for patients who underwent emergency stent insertion for urolithiasis with intraoperative fluoroscopy. Outcomes measured included operator experience, radiation exposure (mGy), dose area product (Gy/cm2), fluoroscopy time, stone characteristics and patient BMI. Analysis was performed in IBM SPSS Version 28. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Four hundred ten patients were identified, with a median age of 57 years, 64.6% male and a median BMI of 30. Urolithiasis was left-sided in 50.8%, with a median size of 7 mm and predominantly proximal (49%) followed by mid (34.5%) and distal (12.1%) location. Median radiation exposure was 12.6 mGy, 2.94 Gy/cm2 and fluoroscopy time 44.5 s, with no significant difference between consultants and registrars. No significant association between radiation exposure for subgroups of stone location, gender, size, laterality or specialty registrar (general surgery vs. urology).

Conclusion

No significant difference in radiation exposure was identified between registrars and consultants or between subspecialty registrars. We suggest formal radiation safety education for all health professionals involved with intra-operative fluoroscopy and personal dosimeters.

The Development and Validation of a Psychometric Tool to Assess Behavioral Factors Impacting Personal Dosimeter Use among Medical Radiation Workers

ABSTRACT

Personal dosimeters are used by medical radiation workers (MRWs) to monitor their radiation dose from external sources and comply with radiation safety guidelines. Nevertheless, there is evidence of inconsistent use of the devices among MRWs. Behavioral factors influencing the use of personal dosimeters have never been explored. Using established behavioral models, we aimed to develop a psychometric tool to measure the behavioral factors influencing dosimeter use and establish its feasibility, reliability, and validity. A 37-item tool was developed based on a qualitative study and review of the literature. The content relevancy was assessed by six field experts before it was piloted and re-tested on MRWs. The construct validity of the tool was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis to confirm its psychometric properties. Face validation was performed by academicians, field experts, and MRWs to enhance the tool's readability. The 37 items in the tool belonged to five constructs in the early phase. However, the validation study revealed a reliable 27 item tool with seven constructs, namely: "Attitude," "Social factors," "Ability to perform if facilitated," "Ability to overcome shortcomings," "Self-efficacy," "Complexity," and "Perceived usefulness." The item-construct validity index of accepted items was >0.83, and Cronbach's alpha for each construct ranged between 0.70 to 0.96, while factor loading for each item was between 0.723 to 0.963. All results were considered "good" and "excellent." The new tool appears to be valid, reliable, and feasible to measure behavioral factors influencing personal dosimeter use among MRWs, which is helpful to facilitate the planning of interventions to improve behaviors in occupational radiation monitoring.

Optimization of emission chimney heights for uranium enrichment facility based on individual dose

The individual dose caused by airborne effluents varies with the height of the chimney. In order to reduce the individual dose caused by uranium enrichment facilities, the height of the chimney is optimized, and considering the impact of radioactive effluents within 5 km of the site, the Cairdos program is used to simulate and predict the long-term atmospheric diffusion factors and individual dose distribution.The results showed that 234U had a greater impact on individual dose contribution, and the long-term dispersion factor and the maximum individualdose appeared in the southeast-east (ESE) direction. The individual dose caused by 10 m, 30 m and 60 m chimneys was 6.78, 3.41 and 1.60 times that of the 80 m chimney, respectively. Therefore, increasing the height of the chimney can effectively reduce the individual dose. The peak value of the individual dose caused by the 150 m and 200 m chimneys was 0.39 and 0.32 times that of the 80 m chimney, respectively. Therefore, When the chimney height is higher than 80m, the extra high chimney can reduce the individual dose, but the decrease of the individual dose is significantly less than the increase of chimney height.

ALARA in Urology: Steps to Minimise Radiation Exposure During All Parts of the Endourological Journey

Purpose of the Review

The global burden of kidney stone disease (KSD) and its management relies on ionising radiation. This includes the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of KSD patients. The concept ‘As Low As Reasonably Achievable’ (ALARA) developed in response to the radiation risks and the key principles include optimisation, justification and limitation of radiation. This article provides an overview of the topic including background to the risks and steps that can be taken during all stages of endourological management.

Recent Findings

Our review suggests that ionising radiation is an invaluable tool in delineating the anatomy, localising disease, guiding manoeuvres and monitoring treatment in patients with KSD. It therefore plays an integral role in many stages of patient care; preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively.

The reduction of radiation pre- and post-surgical intervention relies on the use of low-radiation CT scan and ultrasound scan. It can also be achieved through various intraoperative techniques or fluoroless techniques in selected patients/procedures, customised to the patients and procedural complexity.

Summary

There are many parts of the patient journey where exposure to radiation can take place. Urologists must be diligent to minimise and mitigate this wherever possible as they too face exposure risks. Implementation of strategies such as teaching programmes, fluoroscopy checklists and judicious use of CT imaging among other things is a step towards improving practice in this area.

Occupational doses in interventional angiography after radiological protection training and use of a real-time direct display dosimeter

Vascular x-ray guided interventions are complex and may result in high occupational doses to ionising radiation if staff do not take appropriate actions to minimise their exposure. In this prospective intervention study, ten staff members wore an extra personal dosimeter on the upper body above their regular protective clothing during four consecutive periods. Between each period either additional practical radiological protection training was given or a real-time direct display dosimeter were provided to the staff. Each staff's personal dose equivalent, Hp(10) normalised to the total air kerma-area product for the procedures where each staff were involved, KAPt, was used as the dependent variable. A focus-group interview with the staff were performed about the usefulness of the training and real-time dose rate display system. Our aim was to investigate if the interventions (practical training or real-time dose rate display) did affect the staff doses in the short and long term (five months later). Significant (p < 0.05) reductions of staff doses Hp(10)/KAPt were found after practical radiological protection training, but not after using real-time dose rate displays. Significant reductions were maintained after five months without additional interventions. The results from the focus-group interview indicated that making radiation 'visible', during practical training and usage of real-time direct display dosimeter, made it easier to understand how to act to lower occupational doses.

DOES RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION TRAINING OR A REAL-TIME STAFF DOSEMETER DISPLAY REDUCE STAFF DOSES DURING X-RAY-GUIDED PULMONARY BRONCHOSCOPY?

X-ray-guided interventions have increased in number and complexity. Mandatory radiological protection training includes both theoretical and practical training sessions. A recent additional training tool is real-time display dosemeters that give direct feedback to staff on their individual dose rates. Ten staff members who regularly perform pulmonary bronchoscopy wore an extra dosemeter during four 2-month periods. We controlled for the patient air kerma area product and the number of procedures in each period. Between periods 1 and 2, radiological training sessions were held and during period 3 the staff used the real-time display system. Focus-group interviews with the staff were held to obtain their opinion about learning radiological protection. We hypothesised that neither training nor the additional real-time dose rate display alters the personal dose equivalent, Hp(d); d = 0.07 and 10 mm. Useful experiences from radiological protection training were obtained, and median staff doses did decrease, however not significantly.

Effect of Structured Educational Program on Practices of Radiation Safety Measures Among Health Care Providers in Urology Operation Theater

Introduction Endourologists are at increased risk of exposure to radiations. Many studies are available that have studied awareness in doctors in general, but very few studies available regarding any intervention to improve the knowledge of radiation safety measures. We have made an attempt to study the role of an educational intervention to improve the knowledge of our Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) urology operation theater health care providers (HCPs). Materials and methods Our study was an Interventional study (prospective clinical trial), conducted in the Department of Urology, JIPMER from January 2017 to March 2018. All, that is, 40 operation theater HCPs were given a questionnaire as baseline. The baseline response was compared to the response after the Structured Education Program (SEP) by using the same questionnaire. The knowledge of participants before SEP was compared with the knowledge after SEP using the chi-square test. All statistical analysis was carried out at a 5% level of significance and p-value < 0.05 was considered as significant. Result In our study after SEP, participants use of lead apron has increased from 72.5% to 92.5%, indicating improvement. There is an increase in the use of thyroid shield from 22.5% to 95%. In our study after SEP, knowledge about background radiations improved in participants from 25% to 87.5%. Knowledge about Radiation dose of chest X-ray improved from 22.5% to 52.5%. Knowledge about ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) improved from 47.5% to 95% after SEP. Knowledge that MRI and USG do not have ionizing radiation improved from 62.5% to 97.5%, and from 75% to 92.5% for MRI and USG, respectively, after SEP. Regarding organ sensitivity, 100% HCPs had given correct answers after SEP as compared to 80 before SEP. Conclusion Our study shows that SEP at regular intervals has made significant improvements in daily practice in operation theater HCPs. SEP has increased the use of radiation protective gears among HCP. Hence we recommend SEP at regular intervals for urology operation theater HCPs for a healthy and safe working environment.

Beliefs, Facilitating Factors, and Barriers in Using Personal Dosimeter among Medical Radiation Workers in a Middle-Income Asian Setting

This qualitative study explores the medical radiation workers' (MRWs) beliefs with the support of the theory of planned behaviour's constructs regarding the use of personal dosimeters in order to identify the facilitating factors and barriers to practising good personal dose monitoring. The exploration was conducted through semi-structured face-to-face interviews with 63 MRWs from the public, private, and university hospitals. Belief statements from the informants were organized under the behavioural, normative, and control belief, as guided by the theory. A thematic analysis found that a majority of informants acknowledged the benefits of using dosimeters. However, several factors influenced the actual usage. The informants were hesitant to use the dosimeter as the loss of the device involved an expensive penalty. They also mentioned that delayed dosimeter supplies due to late budget approval in the hospitals and some other reasons had got them disconnected from the monitoring system. The workers' attitudes and social norms highly induced their dosimeter usage as well; some perceived themselves to be at low risk for high exposure to radiation, and forgetfulness was also mentioned as a reason for lack of adherence. Device physical factor influenced low dosimeter use too. This study highlighted some unique findings in Asian settings. A better understanding of the underlying reasons for the lack of dosimeter use will be useful in developing strategies to increase good practices in personal radiation monitoring.

A survey analysis of knowledge levels of urologists about radiation safety and fluoroscopy use

AIMS

To evaluate the awareness of the use of fluoroscopy in endourological procedures, as well as the theoretical and practical applications of preventive measures.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Between May 2018 and April 2019, a 26-question survey prepared using Google Docs was sent to urologists via email. Personal information, radiation training and behaviours related to radiation and fluoroscopy usage, and the use of protective equipment were queried.

RESULTS

A total of 226 participants fully completed and returned the email survey. Of the 226 participants, 78 (34.5%) were academics, 44 (19.4%) were residents while 104 (46.1%) were experts. More than 60% of the participants stated that they participated in the operation requiring less than five fluoroscopy use per week. The majority of operations requiring fluoroscopy consisted of endourological procedures. The lead apron was used by 93% of the participants, but the use of protective glasses and gloves was very low (3.5%). The majority of academicians, experts and residents did not use dosimeters (76.9%, 82.7% and 81.8%, respectively). More than 50% of the participants did not have literature information about the harmful effects of radiation with the use of fluoroscopy. The most common complaints on the day of fluoroscopy were fatigue and headache.

CONCLUSION

The lack of information regarding the radiation protection measures and harmful effects of radiation is common among urologists in Turkey. Therefore, systematic training programs on fluoroscopy use and radiation exposure should be provided during urology residency.

Use of Biological Dosimetry for Monitoring Medical Workers Occupationally Exposed to Ionizing Radiation

Medical workers are the largest group exposed to man-made sources of ionizing radiation. The annual doses received by medical workers have decreased over the last several decades, however for some applications, like fluoroscopically guided procedures, the occupational doses still remain relatively high. Studies show that for some procedures the operator and staff still use insufficient protective and dosimetric equipment, which might cause an underestimation of medical exposures. Physical dosimetry methods are a staple for estimating occupational exposures, although due to the inconsistent use of protection measures, an alternative method such as biological dosimetry might complement the physical methods to achieve a more complete picture. Such methods were used to detect exposures to doses as low as 0.1 mSv/year, and could be useful for a more accurate assessment of genotoxic effects of ionizing radiation in medical workers. Biological dosimetry is usually based on the measurement of the effects present in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Although some methods, such as chromosome aberration scoring or micronucleus assay, show promising results, currently there is no one method recognized as most suitable for dosimetric application in the case of chronic, low-dose exposures. In this review we decided to evaluate different methods used for biological dosimetry in assessment of occupational exposures of medical workers.

Radiation Safety Knowledge and Practice in Urology Theaters: A Collaborative Multicenter Survey

Objective: To evaluate the knowledge and current radiation safety practice among health care professionals undertaking fluoroscopic procedures in urology. Materials and Methods: A 14-question survey was disseminated to multidisciplinary urology theater staff. Questions included demographic data, usual radiation safety practice, and knowledge. The questions were selected based on guidelines from the International Commission of Radiological Protection and Health and Safety Executive. The survey was disseminated through regional collaborators and social media. Results: The survey received a total of 309 completed responses, including 272 from the United Kingdom. Responses from the United Kingdom multidisciplinary team included 164 (60.3%) urologic surgeons, 68 (25.0%) theater nurses, 27 (9.9%) from the anesthetic team, and 13 (4.7%) radiographers. Results from the United Kingdom demonstrated use of lead aprons and thyroid shields as 99.3% and 52.2%, respectively. Lead glasses and lead glove use were 7.4% and 0.7%, respectively. Lack of availability was cited as a reason for noncompliance with shielding guidelines in 208 (76.5%) of the respondents. No form of training in radiation safety was reported by 120 (44.1%) respondents. However, there was no association between answering knowledge questions correctly and having completed some form of radiation safety training (p = 0.41). There was an association between dosimeter use and those who had received radiation safety training (p = 0.02). Consultant urologists were also more likely to use a dosimeter than training grade urologists (p = 0.035). Conclusion: Suboptimal compliance with radiation safety guidelines is prevalent in contemporary urologic practice, and presents a significant occupational health concern. Availability of protective equipment needs to be urgently addressed.

Radiation safety and knowledge: an international survey of 708 interventional pain physicians

INTRODUCTION

Interventional pain procedures have increased in complexity, often requiring longer radiation exposure times and subsequently higher doses. The practicing physician requires an in-depth knowledge and evidence-based knowledge of radiation safety to limit the health risks to themselves, patients and healthcare staff. The objective of this study was to examine current radiation safety practices and knowledge among interventional pain physicians and compare them to evidence-based recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 49-question survey was developed based on an extensive review of national and international guidelines on radiation safety. The survey was web-based and distributed through the following professional organizations: Association of Pain Program Directors, American Academy of Pain Medicine, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, European Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy, International Neuromodulation Society, and North American Neuromodulation Society. Responses to radiation safety practices and knowledge questions were evaluated and compared with evidence-based recommendations. An exploratory data analysis examined associations with radiation safety training/education, geographical location, practice type, self-perceived understanding, and fellowship experience.

RESULTS

Of 708 responding physicians, 93% reported concern over the health effects of radiation, while only 63% had ever received radiation safety training/education. Overall, ≥80% physician compliance with evidence-based radiation safety practice recommendations was demonstrated for only 2/15 survey questions. Physician knowledge of radiation safety principles was low, with 0/10 survey questions having correct response rates ≥80%.

CONCLUSION

We have identified deficiencies in the implementation of evidence-based practices and knowledge gaps in radiation safety. Further education and training are warranted for both fellowship training and postgraduate medical practice. The substantial gaps identified should be addressed to better protect physicians, staff and patients from unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation during interventional pain procedures.

An Anatolian study on the current knowledge and attitudes of urology operating room staff on ionizing radiation

Background

To evaluate current approaches to ionizing radiation by personnel working in urology operating room at all levels of health service in Anatolia, Turkey.

Methods

A questionnaire was e-mailed to urology operating room personnel including MDs at different academic levels, between August and September 2020 in Anatolia, Turkey. The questionnaire included demographic questions and questions about ionizing radiation, exposure and protection.

Results

Of the 173 (11.9%) respondents, 44.5% were doctors, 24.9% were nurses, 20.8% were radiology technicians, and 9.8% were other operating room personnel. While most participants (73.4%) had some knowledge of radiation, only 42.2% stated they had received radiation-specific training. The two most commonly used personal protective equipments (PPEs) among respondents (79.8%) were lead aprons and thyroid protectors. Interestingly, both types of PPE were preferred among those who had not received radiation safety training. Conversely, besides lead aprons and thyroid protectors; gonadal protection, goggles and gloves were the preferred PPEs among respondents who had received radiation training (p < 0.001). Radiology technicians exhibited the highest compliance rate for dosimeter usage (100%), followed by faculty members (37.5%), urology specialists (36.7%) nurses (27.9%), operating room staff (17.6%) and assistants (15%). While differences in compliance were statistically significant (p < 0.001), no significant relationship was found between radiation protection measures and years of experience, daily fluoroscopy exposure or education level.

Conclusions

Despite advances in medical science, our findings suggest that many hospital personnel are still insensitive to the dangers of fluoroscopy, which is of great importance in urology operating rooms.

Radiation Exposure of Surgical Team During Endourological Procedures: International Atomic Energy Agency-South-Eastern European Group for Urolithiasis Research Study

Introduction: Fluoroscopy-guided endourology procedures require proper radiation protection to minimize radiation risk. This multicenter study aimed at investigating radiation protection practice and related radiation exposure of operating team members. Materials and Methods: Six endourology centers from the South-Eastern European Group for Urolithiasis Research answered questionnaires and collected data of 315 procedures performed within a 3-months period, with simultaneous measurement of dose to staff and dose area product (DAP) to patient. A pair of calibrated personal dosimeters, one for body and one for eye-lens dose, was worn by all key staff members. Dosimeters were centrally calibrated, measured, and analyzed. Results: The annual workload ranged from 173 to 865 procedures per center. Practice of personal dose monitoring and use of radiation protection shielding was found to be inconsistent. Lead aprons and thyroid collars were used by all, whereas protective eyewear was used in only half of centers. Due to the regular use of protective aprons, the whole-body dose of all 44 monitored staff members was safely below the regulatory dose limits. Eye-lens dose of 17 (14 urologists and 3 assisting staff) was above the dosimeter detection level, and dose per procedure varied from <10 to 63 μSv. The highest annual eye-lens dose of 13.5 mSv was found for the surgeon in the busiest department by using an over-the-couch X-ray tube without a ceiling suspended screen. Working closer to patient body with no protection resulted in a six-time higher eye-lens dose per DAP for a surgeon compared with others in the same center. Lower eye-dose per procedure was associated with lower DAP to patient and with the use of an under-the-couch tube, lower fluoroscopy pulse rate, collimation, fluoroscopy time, and acquired images. Conclusions: The study results call for the need to establish standard protocols about use of fluoroscopy during endourology procedures and to increase radiation protection knowledge and awareness of surgical staff.

Impact of Surgical Experience on Radiation Exposure during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of surgical experience on radiation exposure (RE) during endourological procedures has been poorly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of surgical experience on fluoroscopy time (FT) and RE during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The study included 140 patients who underwent RIRS performed either by a senior surgeon (expertise of >100 RIRSs) (group A) or by two junior residents (expertise of <15 RIRSs) (group B) between January 2016 and May 2018.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We tested the hypothesis that surgical experience had a limited impact on RE during RIRS. To adjust for potential baseline confounders, propensity-score matching was performed. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models tested the association between clinical variables and FT and patients' effective doses.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

There was no significant difference between the two groups for baseline, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics. Overall FT (p=0.97) and effective dose (p=0.79) did not differ between groups. A statistically significant association was found between male sex (all p<0.03), stone burden (all p<0.001), operative time (all p<0.003), and postoperative double-J placement (all p<0.02) with both FT and effective dose. Linear multivariable analysis revealed that body mass index was significantly associated with effective dose (p=0.002). Similarly, longer operative time (all p<0.03) and double-J placement (all p<0.04) were significantly associated with increased FT and effective dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical experience has a limited impact on FT and RE during RIRS. Longer operative time and double-J placement were associated with increased FT and effective dose.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we assessed whether surgical experience affects fluoroscopy time and patient's effective dose during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). We found that radiation exposure (RE) was not affected by surgeon's experience and that the standardisation of the surgical technique at the beginning of the learning curve of young surgeons may represent the key factor in reducing RE during RIRS.

Immersive Radiation Experience for Interventional Radiology with Virtual Reality Radiation Dose Visualization Using Fast Monte Carlo Dose Estimation

For interventional radiology (IR), understanding the precise dose distribution is crucial to reduce the risks of radiation dermatitis to patients and staff. Visualization of dose distribution is expected to support radiation safety efforts immensely. This report presents techniques for perceiving the dose distribution using virtual reality (VR) technology and for estimating the air dose distribution accurately using Monte Carlo simulation for VR dose visualization. We adopted an earlier reported Monte-Carlo-based estimation system for IR and simulated the dose in a geometrical area resembling an IR room with fluoroscopic conditions. Users of our VR system experienced a simulated air dose distribution in the IR room while the irradiation angle, irradiation timing, and lead shielding were controlled. The estimated air dose was evaluated through comparison with measurements taken using a radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter. Our dose estimation results were consistent with dosimeter readings, showing a 13.5% average mutual difference. The estimated air dose was visualized in VR: users could view a virtual IR room and walk around in it. Using our VR system, users experienced dose distribution changes dynamically with C-arm rotation. Qualitative tests were conducted to evaluate the workload and usability of our VR system. The perceived overall workload score (18.00) was lower than the scores reported in the literature for medical tasks (50.60) and computer activities (54.00). This VR visualization is expected to open new horizons for understanding dose distributions intuitively, thereby aiding the avoidance of radiation injury.

Radiation exposure to the eyes and thyroid during C-arm fluoroscopy-guided cervical epidural injections is far below the safety limit

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate radiation exposure to the eye and thyroid in pain physicians during the fluoroscopy-guided cervical epidural block (CEB).

Methods

Two pain physicians (a fellow and a professor) who regularly performed C-arm fluoroscopy-guided CEBs were included. Seven dosimeters were used to measure radiation exposure, five of which were placed on the physician (forehead, inside and outside of the thyroid protector, and inside and outside of the lead apron) and two were used as controls. Patient age, sex, height, and weight were noted, as were radiation exposure time, absorbed radiation dose, and distance from the X-ray field center to the physician.

Results

One hundred CEB procedures using C-arm fluoroscopy were performed on comparable patients. Only the distance from the X-ray field center to the physician was significantly different between the two physicians (fellow: 37.5 ± 2.1 cm, professor: 41.2 ± 3.6 cm, P = 0.03). The use of lead-based protection effectively decreased the absorbed radiation dose by up to 35%.

Conclusions

Although there was no difference in radiation exposure between the professor and the fellow, there was a difference in the distance from the X-ray field during the CEBs. Further, radiation exposure can be minimized if proper protection (thyroid protector, leaded apron, and eyewear) is used, even if the distance between the X-ray beam and the pain physician is small. Damage from frequent, low-dose radiation exposure is not yet fully understood. Therefore, safety measures, including lead-based protection, should always be enforced.

Parenthood During Graduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

To conduct a scoping review of the literature on parenthood during graduate medical education (GME) and to develop a conceptual framework to inform policy and guide research.

METHOD

The authors searched PubMed and Embase for articles published from January 1993 through August 7, 2017, using a query framework that combined the concepts of "person" (e.g., "trainee") and "parenthood" (e.g., "breastfeeding"). They included studies describing parenthood or pregnancy of trainees in U.S. GME training programs. Two authors independently screened citations and abstracts and performed kappa coefficient tests to evaluate interreviewer reliability. Two authors performed a full-text review of and extracted data from each included article, and 4 authors coded data for all articles. The authors used descriptive statistics and qualitative synthesis to analyze data.

RESULTS

Ninety articles met inclusion criteria, and nearly half (43/90; 48%) were published between 2010 and 2017. The authors developed 6 themes that surround resident parenthood: well-being, maternal health, others' perceptions, relationships, program preparation, and policy. They mapped these themes by relationship of stakeholders (e.g., infant and family, institutions) to the resident-parent to create a conceptual framework describing parenthood during GME.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this scoping review have implications for policy and research. Those authoring parental leave policies could collaborate with national board leaders to develop consistent standards and include nontraditional families. Gaps in the literature include the effect of resident parenthood on patient care, postpartum health, and policy execution. Research in these areas would advance the literature on parenthood during residency.

Perceptions on radioprotective garment usage and underlying reasons for non-adherence among medical radiation workers from public hospitals in a middle-income Asian setting: A qualitative exploration

Background

Radioprotective garments protect medical radiation workers from exposure to radiation at workplace. However, previous studies have found poor adherence to the use of radioprotective garments.

Objectives

We explored the perceptions and practices related to the use of radioprotective garments among medical radiation workers in public hospitals, and sought to understand the reasons for non-adherence.

Design and setting

A qualitative approach was applied by conducting face-to-face in-depth interviews with 18 medical radiation workers from three university hospitals using a semi-structured interview guide.

Results

Five themes emerged with respect to perceptions on the use of radioprotective garments: (i) the dilemmas in practising radiation protection, (ii) indication of workers' credibility, (iii) physical appearance of radioprotective garments, (iv) practicality of radioprotective garment use, and (v) impact on workflow. Actual lack of radioprotective garment use was attributed to inadequate number of thyroid shield and other garments, radioprotective garments' unsightly appearance including being dirty and defective, impracticality of using radioprotective garments for some nuclear medicine procedures, disruption of workflow because of workers’ limited movements, attitudes of workers, and organisational influences.

Conclusion

Medical radiation workers demonstrated a definitive practice of using radioprotective aprons, but often neglected to use thyroid shields and other garments. Availability and hygiene are reported as the core issues, while unclear guidelines on practical use of radioprotective garments appear to lead to confusion among medical radiation workers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study of its kind from a middle-income Asian setting.

Personal Protective Equipment Availability and Utilization Among Interventionalists

OBJECTIVE

This study explored personal protective equipment (PPE) availability and PPE utilization among interventionalists in the catheterization laboratory, which is a highly contextualized workplace.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study using mixed methods. Participants (108) completed a survey. A hyperlink was sent to the participants, or they were asked to complete a paper-based survey. Purposively selected participants (54) were selected for individual (30) or group (six) interviews. The interviews were conducted at conferences, or appointments were made to see the participants. Logistic regression analysis was performed. The qualitative data were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Lead glasses were consistently used 10.2% and never used 61.1% of the time. All forms of PPE were inconsistently used by 92.6% of participants. Women were 4.3 times more likely to report that PPE was not available. PPE compliance was related to fit and availability.

CONCLUSIONS

PPE use was inconsistent and not always available. Improving the culture of radiation protection in catheterization laboratories is essential to improve PPE compliance with the aim of protecting patients and operators. This culture of radiation protection must include all those involved including the users of PPE and the administrators and managers who are responsible for supplying sufficient, appropriate, fitting PPE for all workers requiring such protection.

Simple preoperative radiation safety interventions significantly lower radiation doses during central venous line placement in children

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to reduce radiation exposure during pediatric central venous line (CVL) placement by implementing a radiation safety process including a radiation safety briefing and a job-instruction model with a preradiation time-out.

METHODS

We reviewed records of all patients under 21 who underwent CVL placement in the operating room covering 22 months before the intervention through 10 months after 2013-2016. The intervention consisted of a radiation safety briefing by the surgeon to the intraoperative staff before each case and a radiation safety time-out. We measured and analyzed the dose area product (DAP), total radiation time pre- and postintervention, and the use of postprocedural chest radiograph.

RESULTS

100 patients with valid DAP measurements were identified for analysis (59 preintervention, 41 postintervention). Following implementation of the radiation safety process, there was a 79% decrease in median DAP (61.4 vs 13.1 rad*cm², P < 0.001) and a 73% decrease in the median radiation time (28 vs 7.6 s, P < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant reduction in use of confirmatory CXR (95% vs 15%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A preoperative radiation safety briefing and a radiation safety time-out supported by a job-instruction model were effective in significantly lowering the absorbed doses of radiation in children undergoing CVL insertion.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case-control study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Interventionalists' perceptions on a culture of radiation protection

BACKGROUND

Occupational exposure to ionising radiation poses potential health risks to radiation workers unless adequate protection is in place. The catheterisation laboratory is a highly contextualised workplace with a distinctive organisational and workplace culture.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to understand the culture of radiation protection (CRP).

METHODS

This study was a qualitative study and data were collected through 30 in-depth and 6 group interviews with 54 purposively selected South African interventionalists (interventional radiologists and cardiologists). The participants included a diversity of interventionalists who varied in sex, geographic location and years of experience with fluoroscopy. The transcribed data were analysed thematically using a deductive and inductive approach.

RESULTS

'Culture of radiation protection' emerged as a complex theme that intersected with other themes: 'knowledge and awareness of radiation', 'radiation safety practice', 'personal protective equipment (PPE) utilisation' and 'education and training'.

CONCLUSION

Establishing and sustaining a CRP provides an opportunity to mitigate the potentially detrimental health effects of occupational radiation exposure. Education and training are pivotal to establishing a CRP. The time to establish a culture of radiation in the catheterisation laboratory is now.

The pregnant urologist

Female urologists represent an ever-increasing percentage of the work force; more and more of our colleagues will be working through pregnancy. There is a lack of clear and concise advice for pregnant urologists about occupational risks during pregnancy. Urology exposes expectant mothers to potential risks from radiation, teratogenic and cytotoxic drugs, iodine hand scrub, infections, and long working hours. We aim to provide a review of the current evidence and guidance to aid expectant mothers in their decision making. Relevant research articles and up-to-date guidance were reviewed. The millisevert (the average accumulated background radiation dose to an individual for 1 year, exclusive of radon) was used as the main unit of radiation dose. There is no published evidence to date in pregnant clinicians that shows a received radiation dose of more than the recommended dose for a pregnant lady, and no data showing an increased risk of foetal abnormalities in clinicians who continue to screen during pregnancy; however, the data are from small studies. There is strong advice suggesting avoidance of contact with crushed or broken 5α-reductase inhibitor tablets (finasteride and dutasteride), mitomycin and other cytotoxic drugs during pregnancy. Pregnant surgeons should avoid frequent use of iodine hand wash. Good hygiene precautions will protect from many infections along with up-to-date immunisations and use of personal protective equipment for certain cases.

Occupational Radiation Exposure of Anesthesia Providers: A Summary of Key Learning Points and Resident-Led Radiation Safety Projects

Anesthesia providers are frequently exposed to radiation during routine patient care in the operating room and remote anesthetizing locations. Eighty-two percent of anesthesiology residents (n = 57 responders) at our institution had a "high" or "very high" concern about the level of ionizing radiation exposure, and 94% indicated interest in educational materials about radiation safety. This article highlights key learning points related to basic physical principles, effects of ionizing radiation, radiation exposure measurement, occupational dose limits, considerations during pregnancy, sources of exposure, factors affecting occupational exposure such as positioning and shielding, and monitoring. The principle source of exposure is through scattered radiation as opposed to direct exposure from the X-ray beam, with the patient serving as the primary source of scatter. As a result, maximizing the distance between the provider and the patient is of great importance to minimize occupational exposure. Our dosimeter monitoring project found that anesthesiology residents (n = 41) had low overall mean measured occupational radiation exposure. The highest deep dose equivalent value for a resident was 0.50 mSv over a 3-month period, less than 10% of the International Commission on Radiological Protection occupational limit, with the eye dose equivalent being 0.52 mSv, approximately 4% of the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommended limit. Continued education and awareness of the risks of ionizing radiation and protective strategies will reduce exposure and potential for associated sequelae.

Predictors of radiation exposure to providers during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Background:

Limited studies have reported on radiation risks of increased ionizing radiation exposure to medical personnel in the urologic community. Fluoroscopy is readily used in many urologic surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to determine radiation exposure to all operating room personnel during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), commonly performed for large renal or complex stones.

Materials and Methods:

We prospectively collected personnel exposure data for all PNL cases at two academic institutions. This was collected using the Instadose™ dosimeter and reported both continuously and categorically as high and low dose using a 10 mrem dose threshold, the approximate amount of radiation received from one single chest X-ray. Predictors of increased radiation exposure were determined using multivariate analysis.

Results:

A total of 91 PNL cases in 66 patients were reviewed. Median surgery duration and fluoroscopy time were 142 (38–368) min and 263 (19–1809) sec, respectively. Median attending urologist, urology resident, anesthesia, and nurse radiation exposure per case was 4 (0–111), 4 (0–21), 0 (0–5), and 0 (0–5) mrem, respectively. On univariate analysis, stone area, partial or staghorn calculi, surgery duration, and fluoroscopy time were associated with high attending urologist and resident radiation exposure. Preexisting access that was utilized was negatively associated with resident radiation exposure. However, on multivariate analysis, only fluoroscopy duration remained significant for attending urologist radiation exposure.

Conclusion:

Increased stone burden, partial or staghorn calculi, surgery and fluoroscopy duration, and absence of preexisting access were associated with high provider radiation exposure. Radiation safety awareness is essential to minimize exposure and to protect the patient and all providers from potential radiation injury.

Characteristics of Independent Academic Medical Center Faculty

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the characteristics of teaching faculty in US surgical residencies based at Independent Academic Medical Centers (IAMCs). The purpose of this study was to survey teaching faculty at IAMCs to better define their common characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN

An online, anonymous survey was distributed through program officials at 96 IAMCs to their faculty and graduates. Respondents were asked about their demographic information, training history, board certification, clinical practice, and exposure to medical students. Student t-tests and chi-square tests were calculated to evaluate associations between faculty characteristics.

SETTING

Independent Academic Medical Center general surgery training programs PARTICIPANTS: A total of 128 faculty at 14 IAMCs participated in the study.

RESULTS

In total, 128 faculty from 14 programs responded to the survey. The mean age of faculty respondents was 52 years and 81% were men. 58% were employed by a nonuniversity hospital, and 28% by a multispecialty practice. 79% of respondents were core faculty. The mean length of time since graduation from surgery residency was 19 years. 86% were currently board certified. 55% of those who were currently board certified had an additional certification. 45% had trained in an IAMC, 50% in an university program, and 5% in a military program. 73% were actively practicing general surgeons, with the majority (70%) performing between 101 and 400 cases annually. The vast majority of faculty (90%) performed <200 endoscopies annually, with 44% performing none. 84% and 35% provided ER and trauma coverage, respectively. 81% listed mentorship as their primary motivation for teaching residents. 23% received a stipend for this teaching. 95% were involved in medical student teaching. Faculty who completed training at university programs had more additional certifications compared with those with IAMC training (67% vs. 43%, p = 0.007). Certification differences by program type were consistent across age and time since residency completion. Age was not associated with residency program type (p = 0.87) nor additional certifications (p = 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

IAMC faculty and graduates are overwhelmingly involved in general surgery, and most faculty have additional certifications. 90% of faculty have clinical exposure to medical students. Faculty at IAMCs were as likely to have been trained at an university program as an IAMC. In a time of increasing surgeon subspecialization and anxiety about the ability of 5-year training programs to train well-rounded surgeons, IAMCs appear to be a repository of consistent general surgical training.

Image intensifier X-ray beam collimation and its effect on radiation dose during ureteroscopy

Objective:

This study aims to assess the use of primary X-ray beam collimation during ureteroscopy and its effect on patient radiation dose.

Methods:

A retrospective review of images and radiation doses of patients undergoing ureteroscopy.

Results:

The use of primary X-ray beam collimation during ureteroscopy is associated with lower radiation doses to the patient. Only 3% of images had evidence of collimation.

Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?

Purpose:

We assessed and evaluated attitudes and knowledge regarding ionizing radiation of urology surgery room staff.

Materials and Methods:

A questionnaire was sent by e-mail to urology surgery room personnel in Turkey, between June and August 2013. The questionnaire included demographic questions and questions regarding radiation exposure and protection.

Results:

In total, 127 questionnaires were answered. Of them, 62 (48.8%) were nurses, 51 (40.2%) were other personnel, and 14 (11%) were radiological technicians. In total, 113 (89%) participants had some knowledge of radiation, but only 56 (44.1%) had received specific education or training regarding the harmful effects of radiation. In total, 92 (72.4%) participants indicated that they used a lead apron and a thyroid shield. In the subgroup that had received education about the harmful effects of radiation, the use ratio for all protective procedures was 21.4% (n=12); this ratio was only 2.8% (n=2) for those with no specific training; the difference was statistically significant (p=0.004). Regarding dosimeters, the use rates were 100% for radiology technicians, 46.8% for nurses, and 31.4% for other hospital personnel; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). No significant relationship between working period in the surgery room, number of daily fluoroscopy procedures, education, task, and use of radiation protection measures was found.

Conclusions:

It is clear that operating room-allied health personnel exposed to radiation do not have sufficient knowledge of ionizing radiation and they do not take sufficient protective measures.

Radiation exposure of patient and surgeon in minimally invasive kidney stone surgery

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are the standard treatments used in the endoscopic treatment of kidney stones depending on the location and the size of the stone. The purpose of the study was to show the radiation exposure difference between the minimally invasive techniques by synchronously measuring the amount of radiation the patients and the surgeon received in each session, which makes our study unique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study which included 20 patients who underwent PNL, and 45 patients who underwent RIRS in our clinic between June 2014 and October 2014. The surgeries were assessed by dividing them into three steps: step 1: the access sheath or ureter catheter placement, step 2: lithotripsy and collection of fragments, and step 3: DJ catheter or re-entry tube insertion.

RESULTS

For the PNL and RIRS groups, mean stone sizes were 30mm (range 16-60), and 12mm (range 7-35); mean fluoroscopy times were 337s (range 200-679), and 37s (range 7-351); and total radiation exposures were 142mBq (44.7 to 221), and 4.4mBq (0.2 to 30) respectively. Fluoroscopy times and radiation exposures at each step were found to be higher in the PNL group compared to the RIRS group. When assessed in itself, the fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure were stable in RIRS, and the radiation exposure was the highest in step 1 and the lowest in step 3 in PNL. When assessed for the 19 PNL patients and the 12 RIRS patients who had stone sizes≥2cm, the fluoroscopy time in step 1, and the radiation exposure in steps 1 and 2 were found to be higher in the PNL group than the RIRS group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although there is need for more prospective randomized studies, RIRS appears to be a viable alternate for PNL because it has short fluoroscopy time and the radiation exposure is low in every step.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Staff lens doses in interventional urology. A comparison with interventional radiology, cardiology and vascular surgery values

The purpose of this work is to evaluate radiation doses to the lens of urologists during interventional procedures and to compare them with values measured during interventional radiology, cardiology and vascular surgery. The measurements were carried out in a surgical theatre using a mobile C-arm system and electronic occupational dosimeters (worn over the lead apron). Patient and staff dose measurements were collected in a sample of 34 urology interventions (nephrolithotomies). The same dosimetry system was used in other medical specialties for comparison purposes. Median and 3rd quartile values for urology procedures were: patient doses 30 and 40 Gy cm(2); personal dose equivalent Hp(10) over the apron (μSv/procedure): 393 and 848 (for urologists); 21 and 39 (for nurses). Median values of over apron dose per procedure for urologists resulted 18.7 times higher than those measured for radiologists and cardiologists working with proper protection (using ceiling suspended screens) in catheterisation laboratories, and 4.2 times higher than the values measured for vascular surgeons at the same hospital. Comparison with passive dosimeters worn near the eyes suggests that dosimeters worn over the apron could be a reasonable conservative estimate for ocular doses for interventional urology. Authors recommend that at least the main surgeon uses protective eyewear during interventional urology procedures.

The Knowledge of Radiation and the Attitude Towards Radio-Protection among Urology Residents in India

INTRODUCTION

Exposure to radiation is a hazard and precautions are necessary to limit it. This study was done to assess the knowledge of radiation and the attitude towards radio-protection among urology residents in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was administered to assess the knowledge and attitude of urology residents who came from all over the country to attend a clinical meeting at Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, India.

RESULTS

All the respondents agreed to being exposed to radiation, with 78.2% using radiation in more than five cases a week. Only 65.2% always took some steps for radio-protection. Lead aprons and thyroid shields were the most common radiation protection devices used. None of the residents ever used lead gloves or protective eye glasses or dosimeters. An 82.6% felt that they did not have adequate knowledge, 85.4% of residents did not receive any formal classes regarding the risk of radiation, 21.7% either rarely or never moved out of the operating room when the radiation was being used, 42.4% did not know that the SI unit of the equivalent absorbed dose of radiation & 52.1% did not know about the amount of radiation delivered to an adult during a contrast enhanced CT scan of the abdomen.

CONCLUSION

Results of the present study reveal that the urology residents of India lack knowledge about the risks of radiation exposure. Majority of them did not take necessary precautions to limit their exposure to radiation.

A novel perineal shield for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

Purpose

To study the impact on radiation exposure to staff through the use of an original perineal shield during low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Material and methods

We designed a 1 mm thick stainless steel shield that duplicates and is able to slide directly over a standard commercialized prostate brachytherapy grid. We then analyzed the post-procedure exposure in 15 consecutive patients who underwent Iodine-125 seed placement. Measurements were performed with and without the shield in place at fixed locations relative to the grid template. Endpoints were analyzed using the paired two-sample t-test, with statistical significance defined as a p-value < 0.05.

Results

The exposure at the midline grid template ranged from 0.144-0.768 mSv/hr without the shield, and 0.038-0.144 mSv/hr with the shield (p < 0.0001). The exposure 10 cm left of the grid template was 0.134-0.576 mSv/hr without the shield, and 0.001-0.012 mSv/hr with the shield (p < 0.0001). The exposure 10 cm right of the grid template was 0.125-0.576 mSv/hr without the shield, and 0.001-0.012 mSv/hr with the shield (p < 0.0001). The median reduction of exposure at the grid was 76% midline, 98.5% left, and 99% right. Similarly, each individual dose rate was recorded at 25 cm from the perineum, both with and without shield. The median reduction of exposure 25 cm from the perineum was 73.7% midline, 77.7% left and 81.6% right (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Our novel shield took seconds to install and was non-restrictive during the procedure, and provided at least a four-fold reduction in radiation exposure to the brachytherapist.