Evaluation of Urology Residency Training and Perceived Resident Abilities in the United States

Urology Resident Autonomy in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

PURPOSE

Surgical resident autonomy in procedures has been eroding over time, due to multiple factors that include duty hour restrictions, focus on operating time, complication rate, and trust among supervising physicians. This study examines whether urology residents at the Veterans Affairs hospitals (VA) have experienced decreased surgical autonomy and contributing factors.

METHODS

The national VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) was queried for the most common urologic procedures between 2004 to 2019 with resident involvement. The most frequent surgeries were transurethral resection of prostate (TURP); transurethral resection of small, medium, or large tumor (TURBT); photo vaporization of prostate, scrotal surgery, and ureteral stent placement. The cases were stratified by resident involvement: attending as primary (AP), attending and resident (AR), resident as primary (RP).

RESULTS

93,756 urology cases were selected from 2004 to 2019. The above procedures accounted for 76.5% of all urologic cases. The percentage of RP cases decreased from 44.4% of cases in 2004 to 25.1% in 2019. Reduction in RP cases was seen in all of the 7 examined urology cases. Cases with resident involvement had patients with more medical comorbidities. Mean operative times were not significantly different. The 30-day composite complications and 30-day return to operating room were greatest for AR. Postoperative morbidity and all-cause mortality were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Urology resident autonomy has decreased within the VA healthcare system over the past 15 years. Mean operative times and postoperative complications are not significantly different in cases with residents as primary surgeon.

The development of surgical ability during pediatric urology fellowship and its evolution in the early years of practice

BACKGROUND

North American Pediatric Urology fellowship programs underwent a structural change in 2021 that allows more flexibility in training. Given this opportunity as well as widespread concern about the development of contemporary surgical trainees, it is prudent to understand in detail the current state of preparedness of pediatric urology fellowship graduates for independent practice.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to determine recent pediatric urology graduates' reported levels of comfort both at graduation and following the start of clinical practice in performing select index procedures. We also queried the aspects of training and clinical practice perceived to be the most valuable for the development of surgical confidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Graduates of ACGME approved pediatric urology fellowships from 2016 to 2021 were surveyed. Index procedures were described via brief case vignettes. Respondents were asked to indicate their comfort level with each index procedure following fellowship graduation and at the current time point. Comfort levels were defined by the degree of support that respondents would seek from senior colleagues in preparation for case booking. Respondents were also asked about the most helpful operative settings during training and factors contributing to high and low comfort.

RESULTS

Fifty-three pediatric urologists (49%) completed the survey out of 109 invited. Most respondents practiced at an academic center. Perceived comfort was very high for low complexity procedures. The responses varied more widely for procedures of moderate and significant complexity (Figure). Across the cohort, there was a substantial increase in comfort between graduation and the current time point for all procedures queried. The most highly valued operative settings in fellowship were those offering real or simulated independence. Respondents most often attributed high comfort to robust case volumes and overall surgical skill gained in fellowship.

DISCUSSION

New pediatric urology faculty differ widely in surgical confidence, particularly for more complex procedures. There is meaningful growth in the confidence and self-perceived independence of pediatric urologists during their initial years of practice. The early years are a critical time of continuing maturation and development that should be supported with structured systems of mentorship. Future challenges include low case volumes for rare conditions and the centralization of complex care.

CONCLUSION

These findings will provide valuable context for pediatric urology fellowship directors as they evaluate and redesign their programs under the new, more flexible structure. There are opportunities to formalize early practice mentorship to support the growth of new faculty.

The Film Room: Using Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate Video Review for Urology Trainees

Video-based educational programs offer a promising avenue to augment surgical preparation, allow for targeted feedback delivery, and facilitate surgical coaching. Recently, developments in surgical intelligence and computer vision have allowed for automated video annotation and organization, drastically decreasing the manual workload required to implement video-based educational programs. In this article, we outline the development of a novel AI-assisted video forum and describe the early use in surgical education at our institution.

Gender Differences in the Adoption and Utilization of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Among Practicing Urologists: A Study of American Board of Urology Case Logs From 2012-2022

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the differential activity in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) by urologic surgeon gender.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of American Board of Urology surgical case logs from 2012-2022. The CPT-coded laparoscopic procedures included were Partial Nephrectomy (50543), Radical Nephrectomy (50545, 50546, 50548), Pyeloplasty (50544), and Sacrocolpopexy (57425). Robotic-assisted cases were co-coded with CPT S2900. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analyzed the roles of physician gender and other factors on RALS utilization. A separate analysis was performed for Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) (55866).

RESULTS

Women performed 10.8% of all procedures and 9.02% of robotic cases. General Urology and Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) had higher concentrations in women. Of the CPT procedures analyzed, women performed the highest percentage of sacrocolpopexies (39.2% of total), 8.09% of which were robotic. In multivariate regression, women surgeons had significantly lower odds of performing a robotic case compared to men (OR 0.803, P <.001). Endourology, Oncology, Pediatric Urology, and URPS subspecialties were associated with RALS. Upward trends were depicted across all physicians (0.012, [0.007, 0.018], P <.001) and for men (0.019, [0.010, 0.029], P = .001). Women showed no significant increase in robotic usage over time (P = .463).

CONCLUSION

Women have lower odds of participating in robotics, primarily specialize in URPS and their involvement in RALS is skewed toward sacrocolpopexy. As robotics continues to dominate surgical urology, ensuring equitable training opportunities is essential. Research into the roles of mentorship in residency, same-gender patient-physician concordance, practice setting, and recent graduates' referral patterns is warranted.

The impact of single-port robotic surgery: a survey among urology residents and fellows in the United States

Our aim was to investigate the perception and future expectations of Single-Port (SP) surgery among urology trainees in the United States. A 34-item online survey was distributed to urological residency and fellowship programs across the US, covering demographic profiles, SP training opportunities, perceived educational impact, and future perspectives. Descriptive analysis and multivariable linear regression were used to assess predictors of SP adoption. 201 surveys were completed (28.6% completion rate). Among institutions with an SP platform, about 50% have used it regularly for over 2 years, though often in less than 50% of procedures. While robotic simulators are commonly available, only 17% offer both multi-port and SP simulators, and structured pre-clinical SP training is limited. Approximately 30% of respondents expressed concerns over limited hands-on experience and a steeper learning curve with SP. Around 40% felt that their robotic surgery exposure was negatively impacted by SP's introduction. SP surgery's benefits are seen mostly in the immediate post-operative period and a significant number of respondents foresee a major role for SP in urology. However, proficiency in SP surgery is not seen as crucial for career advancement or job opportunities. Academic job aspirations, SP platform availability, and SP surgery workload are predictors of future SP implementation. Trainees increasingly recognize the clinical benefits of SP procedures but express concerns about the potential negative impact on hands-on experience. Training programs should more systematically integrate SP technology into curricula. There is a correlation between training in high-volume SP centers and future SP adoption.

Urologic oncology case volume among early career urologists: An analysis of certification data from the American board of urology between 2003 and 2019

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of urologic cancer is expected to increase as the U.S. population ages, but the size of the urologic workforce is not expected to increase at a commensurate rate. To understand this growing imbalance, we explored the extent to which early career urologists performed oncology cases, particularly open surgical cases, between 2003 and 2019.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined case logs submitted by early career urologists applying for their oral American Board of Urology Certifying Examination (Part 2) between 2003 and 2019. We included case logs spanning at least 120 days between the first and last record. We used CPT® codes to identify urologists who performed an open radical cystectomy, nephrectomy, or prostatectomy, as well as those who performed a minimally invasive (MIS) radical nephrectomy or prostatectomy. We calculated the annual percentage of urologists who performed each procedure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis analyzed the association between performing each procedure and specialization or fellowship training in oncology, adjusting for gender, practice type, and year of case log submission.

RESULTS

We identified 4,166 unique urologists submitting case logs between 2003 and 2019. Their average age was 34.9 years, 81.3% were male, 14.2% specialized in oncology, and 8.2% reported oncology fellowship training. From 2003 to 2019, the percentage of urologists who performed open oncologic procedures decreased, while the percentage who performed MIS oncologic procedures increased. Fellowship training in oncology significantly increased the odds of performing the following procedures: open radical cystectomy (72.5% with fellowship training vs. 30.0% without fellowship training, OR 2.51, 95% CI 0.63-0.92, P < 0.001), open radical nephrectomy (74.3% with fellowship training vs 42.4% without fellowship training, OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.48-2.78, P < 0.001), open radical prostatectomy (42.1% with fellowship training vs. 26.9% without fellowship training, OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.34-2.58, P < 0.001) and MIS radical prostatectomy (80.4% with fellowship training vs. 45.0% without fellowship training, OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.16-2.48, P = 0.006). When comparing those with solely oncology specialization to those with both oncology specialization and fellowship training, we found that those with oncology fellowship training had over 2 times higher odds of performing open radical cystectomy (OR 2.58, CI 1.78-3.74, P < 0.001), open radical nephrectomy (OR 2.06, CI 1.42-2.99, P < 0.001) and open radical prostatectomy (OR 2.12, CI 1.44-3.12, P < 0.001). Female urologists had significantly lower odds of performing each oncologic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis of early career urologist case logs, the proportion of urologists performing a radical cystectomy, radical nephrectomy, and open prostatectomy declined between 2003 and 2019. Oncology specialization or fellowship training, however, significantly increased the odds of performing the procedures. Specifically, oncology fellowship alone was associated with over 2 times the odds of performing major open oncologic procedures. These findings reflect ongoing specialization among early career urologists, such that an oncology fellowship or practice focus has likely become necessary for access to open urologic procedures and to become a high-volume urologic oncology surgeon.

Lessons learned from the Sexual Medicine Society of North America fellowship bootcamp

BACKGROUND

Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) fellowships offer variable experience in sexual health domains: erectile dysfunction, Peyronie's disease, male infertility, male hypogonadism (low testosterone), reconstruction (including male incontinence), benign prostatic hyperplasia, gender affirmation surgery, sexual mental health, and female sexual dysfunction.

AIM

To evaluate baseline and postbootcamp understanding and trust in these domains.

METHODS

In 2023, 28 of 31 urologists currently enrolled in SMSNA-endorsed fellowships participated in a 3.5-day training bootcamp in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Participants were asked to complete pre- and postbootcamp surveys. The bootcamp curriculum offered American Urological Association guidelines and case-based lectures, hands-on clinical training with cadavers (penile surgery) and models (collagenase training), and interaction with industry.

OUTCOMES

Changes in knowledge, independence, and trust in performing the procedures, as well as billing issues and feedback for future bootcamps.

RESULTS

Prebootcamp surveys revealed vastly varied residency experience. Reported time with an expert faculty member was greatest for benign prostatic hyperplasia and least for female sexual dysfunction, gender affirmation surgery, and low testosterone. The lowest prebootcamp confidence in performing surgery independently was for penile grafting procedures and elevating the neurovascular bundle. Postbootcamp results revealed several areas of significant improvement in confidence (P ≤ .03): intralesional injections for Peyronie's disease, manual modeling, penile plication, penile grafting procedures, and elevating the neurovascular bundle. There was a trend for improved confidence with the insertion of inflatable (P = .05) and semirigid (P = .08) penile prostheses. Nonsignificant improvement occurred in artificial urinary sphincter surgery (P = .12). Participants graded the bootcamp very highly and requested that next year's bootcamp have more content on female sexual dysfunction, male incontinence, and low testosterone, as well as more hands-on skills sessions and case-based lecture formats.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Offering a bootcamp with hands-on instruction could significantly improve urologists' knowledge and confidence.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

As the main strength, this study was the first specialized bootcamp for urologists in the subject of men's health, taking into account hands-on and cadaver laboratories, as well as highlighting industrial and pharmaceutical products. The small sample size was the major limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Current SMSNA fellows present with varied levels of experience and confidence across sexual health domains. Notable confidence improvements were seen with topics that combined didactic lectures with hands-on trainings.

Investigation of Disparity of Urologic Fellowship Match Rates by Gender and US Versus International Medical Graduates Over the Past Decade

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of postgraduate medical education (US vs international) and gender on applicant matching for postgraduate training across different urologic sub-specialties.

METHODS

Match statistics of 5 societies that participated in the AUA fellowship match between 2010 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Societies included: Endourology Society (EUS), Society for Urological Oncology (SUO), American Society of Andrology (ASA), Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (GURS), and Society of Pediatric Urology (SPU). Candidates were classified based on gender (male/female) and their postgraduate medical education: local graduates from the United States or Canada (US/Ca) and international medical graduates (IMGs). The match odds were analyzed using the Chi-square test, while trends were assessed through the Mann-Kendall test.

RESULTS

Overall, 2439 applicants applied for 1627 programs from 2010 to 2024, comprising 1998 males (81.8%), 399 females (16.4%), and 42 undisclosed (1.7%). There were 1486 US/Ca graduates (60.8%) and 953 IMGs (39.2%). Around 1471 (60.6%) applicants were matched with a program, compared to 958 (39.4%) unmatched. The likelihood of US/Ca graduates matching (83.8%) was significantly higher than IMGs (23.3%), OR= 17.5, 95% CI: (14.3, 21.5), P <.001. IMGs had the highest match rate with GURS (33.8%, 47/118) and the lowest with SPU (7%, 1/14). Female applicants had a significantly higher chance of matching 324/399 (81.2%) than male applicants 1139/1998 (57%), OR= 3.26, 95% CI: (2.5, 4.3), P <.001. US/Ca-to-IMGs ratios and the male-to-female ratios were stable throughout the match years.

CONCLUSION

Compared to IMGs, U.S./Ca graduates had remarkably higher matching rates. Matching outcomes were also significantly better for female applicants. Further assessment of international involvement and diversity in urological subspecialty roles is warranted.

Specialty-Specific Trends in Surgery for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Post Vaginal Mesh

IMPORTANCE

Since transvaginal mesh (VM) kits for apical pelvic organ prolapse (APOP) were labeled "high-risk" in 2016 and subsequently banned in 2019 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the most common remaining surgical options include abdominal mesh-augmented sacrocolpopexy (AS) and transvaginal native tissue suspension (VN).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine temporal trends in APOP procedures for urologists and gynecologists.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 2011 and 2020, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for AS, VM, and VN.

RESULTS

There were 26,477 cases of APOP repair (32% AS, 6% VM, 62% VN) included, 9% by urologists. Urologists operated on older (65 vs 61 years) patients with more medical comorbidities. Urologists performed significantly higher proportion of AS (65% vs 29%) and VM (8% vs 6%) relative to VN (27% vs 65%) than gynecologists ( P < 0.0001). Transvaginal mesh utilization has decreased over time for both specialties ( P < 0.05); nonsignificant trends toward increasing AS ( P = 0.1646) in urologists and VN ( P = 0.0913) in gynecologists concurrently occurred. Significant independent predictors of the operating surgeon being a urologist were surgery being performed in the latter half of the cohort (2016-2020; odds ratio [OR], 1.22), non-White patient race (OR < 1 for all), a concomitant sling being placed (OR = 0.89), the surgery being VM (OR = 2.95) or AS (OR = 4.36), the patient being older (OR > 1 for each age range), and having a higher frailty index score (OR = 1.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in APOP repair choices exist between specialties. Urologists operate on older, more medically complex patients while demonstrating a strong preference for mesh-augmented compared with transvaginal native tissue repairs.

Current status of robotic training during the urology residency: results from a national survey in Spain

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The increasing number of robotic urological procedures observed in recent years highlights the need to expand training opportunities in robotic surgery. Our objective is to investigate the state of robotic training during urology residency in Spain in order to identify significant deficiencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 20-item online survey was conducted among urology residents in Spain who were registered in the database of the Residents and Young Urologists Group of the Spanish Association of Urology. The survey assessed subjective opinions, institutional aspects, training resources, and experience regarding robotic surgery. A total of 455 email invitations were sent throughout the year 2021. Descriptive analysis of the responses was performed.

RESULTS

The participation rate reached 30%, with a total of 135 residents. 52% of respondents lacked access to a robotic system in their institution, of which only 48% could compensate for this deficiency through external rotations. Among those with access to a robotic system, 25% and 23% reported having access to theoretical and practical training, respectively. The existence of a formal training program was low (13%). 85% of the respondents considered robotic surgery training in Spain to be deficient.

CONCLUSIONS

Training for Spanish residents in robotic urological surgery is perceived as inadequate, emphasizing the crucial need for improvement in training programs in this field.

Putting the coach in the game: Current and future state of surgical coaching in pediatric urology

BACKGROUND

Surgical coaching has been proposed as a mechanism to fill gaps in proficiency and encourage continued growth following formal surgical training. Coaching benefits have been demonstrated in other surgical fields; however, have not been evaluated within pediatric urology. The aims of this study were to survey members of The Societies for Pediatric Urology (SPU) to assess the current understanding and utilization of surgical coaching while gauging interest, potential barriers and personal goals for participation in a coaching program.

METHODS

Following IRB approval, members of the SPU were invited to electronically complete an anonymous survey which assessed 4 domains: 1) understanding of surgical coaching principles, 2) current utilization, 3) interest and potential barriers to participation, and 4) personal surgical goals. To evaluate understanding, questions with predefined correct answers on the key principles of coaching were posed either in multiple choice or True/False format to the SPU membership.

RESULTS

Of the 674 pediatric urologists invited, 146 completed the survey (22%). Of those, 46% correctly responded the definition of surgical coaching. Coaching utilization was reported in 27% of respondents currently or having previously participated in a surgical coaching program. Despite current participation rates, only 6 surgeons (4%) have completed training in surgical coaching, despite 79% expressing interest to participate in a surgical coaching program. The most influential barrier to participating in a coaching program was time commitment. Respondents largely prioritized technical and cognitive skill improvement as their primary goals for coaching (see figure below).

CONCLUSIONS

While interest in surgical coaching is high among pediatric urologists, the principles of surgical coaching were not universally understood. Furthermore, formal coach training is markedly deficient, representing a gap in our profession and an opportunity for significant avenues for improvement, especially for technical and cognitive skills. Development of a coaching model based on these results would best suit the needs of pediatric urologists providing that the time commitment barrier for these endeavors can be mitigated and/or reconciled.

Young urologists and kidney transplantation training: A survey designed by the French Transplantation Committee of the French Association of Urology (CTAFU) and the French Association of Urologists in training (AFUF)

OBJECTIVE

In France, kidney transplantations (KT) are mainly performed by urologist. Young urologists and residents are involved in this activity mostly performed in emergency. How do they feel about KT training? Is KT an attractive part of the urologist activity?

METHODS

This survey has been designed in the form of a questionnaire by the French Committee of Kidney Transplantation (CTAFU) and the French Association of Urologists in training (AFUF). It has been sent by e-mail to all the AFUF members. Interest in KT and performance of the training were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 126 members filed the form. Among the residents, 51.5% feel secure to perform KT at the end of their residency. KT is considered as an interesting surgery for 92.1% of the participants: 76.5% are willing to get involved in KT during their residency/fellowship. Among the participants, 44% are willing to continue a long-term involvement. Among the residents, 65.9% consider their practical training insufficient: 56.8% have been supervised for a KT performance during their residency and 86% declare a lack of practical training and had a patient-based learning. Among the residents, 92.1% declare an insufficient theorical training. Among the residents, 33.3% say the schedules of transplantation limit their interest in KT. Among the participants, 34.4% receive a transplant bonus in addition to the usual on-call salary.

CONCLUSION

Young urologists wish to continue their involvement in KT activity, but improved theoretical and practical training are essential. In addition, the conditions under which this activity is performed and remunerated are a matter of concern.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Gap analysis between trainees' subjective competencies and the competencies expected by instructors in urology: A need assessment survey in Japan

OBJECTIVE

According to the rapid progress in surgical techniques, a growing number of procedures should be learned during postgraduate training periods. This study aimed to clarify the current situation regarding urological surgical training and identify the perception gap between trainees' competency and the competency expected by instructors in Japan.

METHODS

Regarding the 40 urological surgical procedures selected via the Delphi method, we collected data on previous caseloads, current subjective autonomy, and confidence for future skill acquisition from trainees (<15 post-graduate years [PGY]), and the competencies when trainees became attending doctors expected by instructors (>15 PGY), according to a 5-point Likert scale. In total, 174 urologists in Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

The response rate was 96% (165/174). In a large proportion of the procedures, caseloads grew with accumulation of years of clinical practice. However, trainees had limited caseloads of robotic and reconstructive surgeries even after 15 PGY. Trainees showed low subjective competencies at present and low confidence for future skill acquisition in several procedures, such as open cystectomy, ureteroureterostomy, and ureterocystostomy, while instructors expected trainees to be able to perform these procedures independently when they became attending doctors.

CONCLUSION

Trainees showed low subjective competencies and low confidence for future skill acquisition in several open and reconstructive procedures, while instructors considered that these procedures should be independently performable by attending doctors. We believe that knowledge of these perception gaps is helpful to develop a practical training program.

Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on Training

Background

Surgical education lacks a standardized, proficiency-based approach to evaluation and feedback.

Objective

To assess the implementation and reception (ie, feasibility) of an automated, standardized, longitudinal surgical skill assessment and feedback system, and identify baseline trainee (resident and fellow) characteristics associated with achieving proficiency in robotic surgery while learning robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Design setting and participants

A quality improvement study assessing a pilot of a surgical experience tracking program was conducted over 1 yr. Participants were six fellows, eight residents, and nine attending surgeons at a tertiary cancer center.

Intervention

Trainees underwent baseline self-assessment. After each surgery, an evaluation was completed independently by the trainee and attending surgeons. Performance was rated on a five-point anchored Likert scale (trainees were considered "proficient" when attending surgeons' rating was ≥4). Technical skills were assessed using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) and Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation (PACE).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Program success and utility were assessed by evaluating completion rates, evaluation completion times, and concordance rates between attending and trainee surgeons, and exit surveys. Baseline characteristics were assessed to determine associations with achieving proficiency.

Results and limitations

Completion rates for trainees and attending surgeons were 72% and 77%, respectively. Fellows performed more steps/cases than residents (median [interquartile range]: 5 [3-7] and 3 [2-4], respectively; p < 0.01). Prior completion of robotics or laparoscopic skill courses and surgical experience measures were associated with achieving proficiency in multiple surgical steps and GEARS domains. Interclass correlation coefficients on individual components were 0.27-0.47 on GEARS domains.

Conclusions

An automated surgical experience tracker with structured, longitudinal evaluation and feedback can be implemented with good participation and minimal participant time commitment, and can guide curricular development in a proficiency-based education program by identifying modifiable factors associated with proficiency, individualizing education, and identifying improvement areas within the education program.

Patient summary

An automated, standardized, longitudinal surgical skill assessment and feedback system can be implemented successfully in surgical education settings and used to inform education plans and predict trainee proficiency.

The interplay between mentalization, personality traits and burnout in psychiatry training: Results from a large multicenter controlled study

BACKGROUND

A better characterization of educational processes during psychiatry training is needed, both to foster personal resilience and occupational proficiency.

METHODS

An adequate coverage of medical residents at the national level was reached (41.86% of the total reference population, 29 out of 36 training centers-80.55%). Controls were recruited among residents in other medical specialties. All participants were assessed by questionnaires to evaluate early life experiences, attachment style, personality traits, coping strategies, emotional competencies. A Structural Equation Model (SEM) framework was employed to investigate the interplay between individual factors.

RESULTS

A total sample of 936 people was recruited (87.9% response-rate; 645 residents in psychiatry, 291 other medical residents). Psychiatry trainees reported a higher prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (emotional abuse, emotional neglect, physical neglect), greater attachment insecurity (anxious or avoidant) in comparison to other medical trainees. Psychiatry residents also reported higher social support-seeking as a coping strategy, lower problem-orientation, and lower transcendence. Lower neuroticism, higher openness to experience, and higher emotional awareness were also observed in psychiatry trainees. Psychiatry training was associated with a redefinition of conflict management skills as a function of seniority. The SEM model provided support for an interplay between early traumatic experiences, mentalization skills (coping strategies, emotion regulation), interpersonal competencies and occupational distress.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study supported a theoretical model based on mentalization theory for the interactions between personal and relational competencies in psychiatry training, thus providing potential target of remodulation and redefinition of this specific process of education.

Robotic surgery education in Australia and New Zealand: primetime for a curriculum

BACKGROUND

Globally, robotic surgery (RS) has witnessed remarkable growth, yet Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) lack dedicated RS training programs, creating a workforce gap. This narrative review synthesises international research to explore trends and challenges in robotic education.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE using keywords like 'robotic surgery', 'surgical education', 'robotic surgery training', and 'robotic surgery curriculum'. We selected studies contributing to understanding current curricula, training tools, and issues in robotic education, utilising the international experience and how it might apply to the ANZ context.

RESULTS

RS in ANZ has grown significantly over two decades, but formal curricula for trainees are absent. North America and Europe employ diverse training tools and curricula. Barriers include cost, access, time constraints, equipment complexity, changing training environments, and competition from emerging robotic surgical systems. Balancing the curriculum's demands with trainees' existing requirements is essential.

CONCLUSION

Developing a tailored RS curriculum within ANZ's surgical training is crucial for RS to become the primary surgical approach in the future. By working towards a national curriculum we can prepare skilled trainees in robotics to meet the rising demand. The most significant barrier is the lack of robotics in public hospital where trainees are based. This curriculum should encompass online teaching modules, bedside assistance, surgical simulation, dual console mentoring, and primary operator experience.

The State of Urotrauma Education Among Residency Programs in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of urotrauma is a crucial part of a urologist's knowledge and training. We therefore sought to understand the state of urotrauma education in the United States.

RECENT FINDINGS

Using themes of "Urotrauma" and "Education," we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching for studies in MEDLINE, all Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Scopus, and Web of Science through May 2023. The primary outcome was the pooled rate of urology trainee and program director attitudes toward urotrauma education. Secondary outcomes involved a descriptive summary of existing urotrauma curricula and an assessment of factors affecting urotrauma exposure. Of 12,230 unique records, 11 studies met the final eligibility criteria, and we included 2 in the meta-analysis. The majority of trainees and program directors reported having level 1 trauma center rotations (range 88-89%) and considered urotrauma exposure as an important aspect of residency education (83%, 95% CI 76-88%). Despite possible increases in trainee exposure to Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (GURS) faculty over the preceding decade, nearly a third of trainees and program directors currently felt there remained inadequate exposure to urotrauma during training (32%, 95% CI 19-46%). Factors affecting urotrauma education include the limited exposure to GURS-trained faculty and clinical factors such as case infrequency and non-operative trauma management. Urology resident exposure to urotrauma is inadequate in many training programs, underscoring the potential value of developing a standardized curriculum to improve urotrauma education for trainees. Further investigation is needed to characterize this issue and to understand how it impacts trainee practice readiness.

Longitudinal Changes in the Operative Experience for Junior Urology Residents

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate longitudinal trends in surgical case volume among junior urology residents. There is growing perception that urology residents are not prepared for independent practice, which may be linked to decreased exposure to major cases early in residency.

METHODS

Retrospective review of deidentified case logs from urology residency graduates from 12 academic medical centers in the United States from 2010 to 2017. The primary outcome was the change in major case volume for first-year urology (URO1) residents (after surgery internship), measured using negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

A total of 391,399 total cases were logged by 244 residency graduates. Residents performed a median of 509 major cases, 487 minor cases, and 503 endoscopic cases. From 2010 to 2017, the median number of major cases performed by URO1 residents decreased from 64 to 49 (annual incidence rate ratio 0.90, P < .001). This trend was limited to oncology cases, with no change in reconstructive or pediatric cases. The number of major cases decreased more for URO1 residents than for residents at other levels (P-values for interaction <.05). The median number of endoscopic cases performed by URO1 residents increased from 85 to 194 (annual incidence rate ratio 1.09, P < .001), which was also disproportionate to other levels of residency (P-values for interaction <.05).

CONCLUSION

There has been a shift in case distribution among URO1 residents, with progressively less exposure to major cases and an increased focus on endoscopic surgery. Further investigation is needed to determine if this trend has implications on the surgical proficiency of residency graduates.

Current exposure to Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery faculty during urology residency

INTRODUCTION

Contemporary US resident exposure to Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) faculty during urology residency is unknown.

METHODS

Accredited US urology residencies were identified through the American Urological Association (AUA). Accredited, urology-based FPMRS fellowships were identified through the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction. The number of faculty and residency positions were obtained from program AUA profiles if they were last modified within the current application cycle; this information was obtained from program websites if AUA profiles were outdated. Data on faculty fellowship training was manually extracted from program websites. A quality control cross-check of program and faculty training characteristics was performed through direct communication with 5% of programs.

RESULTS

Of 139 accredited residency programs assessed, 10.8% were affiliated with an accredited, urology-based FPMRS fellowship. In total, 29.5% of residency programs, representing 25% of US urology residents, had neither a FPMRS fellowship nor any FPMRS certified faculty. The national FPMRS faculty-to-resident ratio was 1:10.8, and 7.4% of faculty at all residency programs were FPMRS certified. In comparison, faculty-to-resident ratios for other subspecialties were: 1:4.7 for pediatrics, 1:3.6 for oncology, 1:5.9 for minimally invasive surgery/endourology, 1:14.2 for trauma/reconstruction, and 1:11.8 for andrology or male sexual/reproductive health. The FPMRS faculty-to-resident ratio was 1:5.1 in programs with a urology-based FPMRS fellowship compared with 1:13.4 in programs without a FPMRS fellowship.

CONCLUSIONS

30% of US urology residency programs lack FPMRS trained faculty. Even when FPMRS faculty are on staff, the field is often underrepresented relative to other urologic subspecialties. Further studies are required to ascertain if inadequate exposure to FPMRS cases and mentors during training contribute to the shortage of urology residents who choose to specialize in FPMRS. This link has important implications for the current shortage of FPMRS providers.

Development and Application of a Novel and Efficient Skills Assessment Tool: A Pilot Initiative to Measure Vasectomy Competency on a Smartphone

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate a mobile phone-based skills assessment tool that measures procedural competency of urology residents learning to perform a common, non-robotic urology procedure as a means of tracking current skillset and improvement over time.

METHODS

The assessment tool was a Qualtrics survey accessed via a smartphone link that breaks down a vasectomy into 6 critical steps. Level of competency was measured on a scale of '1-novice' to '5-expert.' Nine residents from Post graduate year (PGY)-1 to PGY-5 were evaluated by one instructor after completing a vasectomy (86 single-side cases recorded over a 6-month period). We compared individual trainees to each other, analyzed performance (improvement) over time, and evaluated competency against cohort and program averages.

RESULTS

As an example, a single resident ('Resident 2,' N = 11 cases) was compared to cohort (PGY, M = 7.5/resident) and program (all residents, M = 7.4/resident). Results indicate similar skillfulness across Step 1 (puncturing and isolation of vas and hand positioning; P > 0.1), but marginally lower competency on Step 2 (opening of vasal sheath to expose/isolate vas; vs. cohort: P = 0.076, vs. residents: P = 0.082). Significantly lower competency on Steps 3-6 (all P < 0.04) suggests targeted teaching could improve cautery technique, fascial interposition, hemostasis, and positioning of stumps.

CONCLUSION

Our mobile-based skills assessment is a low cost, novel, and efficient assessment that would support current Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) goals to increase competency-based residency training. This tool is easily created and accessed, provides real-time feedback to learners, and can be used for individual and group assessment at a single timepoint or longitudinally.

Advancing Urology Resident Surgical Autonomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper aims to survey current literature on urologic graduate medical education focusing on surgical autonomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Affording appropriate levels of surgical autonomy has a key role in the education of urologic trainees and perceived preparedness for independent practice. Recent studies in surgical resident autonomy have demonstrated a reduction in autonomy for trainees in recent years. Efforts to advance the state of modern surgical training include creation of targeted curricula, enhanced with use of surgical simulation, and structured feedback. Decline in surgical autonomy for urology residents may influence confidence after completion of their residency. Further study is needed into the declining levels of urology resident autonomy, how it affects urologists entering independent practice, and what interventions can advance autonomy in modern urologic training.

Advancements in Surgical Performance Evaluation and Feedback

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

How today's urology trainees acquire surgical skills has changed dramatically due to multiple forces placing strain on the graduate medical education mission. The development of workplace-based assessments that deliver feedback while capturing performance data has led to a paradigm shift toward individualized learning.

RECENT FINDINGS

Delivering feedback that drives surgical skill development requires the educator to provide a meaningful assessment of the learner after an operative experience. Workplace-based assessment involves direct observation of routine clinical practice and has become a central component of competency-based medical education. Urology has the chance to fully embrace competency-based medical education, employing robust feedback mechanisms and workplace-based assessments. We must first define what it means to be a proficient urologist and design an assessment system that captures this collective sentiment. This can only be done through effective engagement and collaboration with stakeholders across our specialty.

Impact of COVID-19 on Society of Urologic Oncology fellowship operative volumes

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted all aspects of healthcare including surgical training. Our objective was to assess the impact of the pandemic on surgical case volumes of graduating Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) fellows during the academic years 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Deidentified case logs for graduating SUO fellows from 2017 to 2021 were obtained from the SUO Education Committee. Cases are stratified by category and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open approach. Graduates of 2017, 2018, and 2019 were combined into a pre-COVID cohort and compared to COVID-affected 2020 and 2021 cohorts. Total case volumes, case category volumes, and surgical approach type were compared with Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

A total of 173 graduating SUO fellow case logs were analyzed with 100, 38, and 35 in the pre-COVID and COVID-affected 2020 and 2021 cohorts, respectively. All fellow logs were obtained for 2017 to 2020 graduates while 5 of 40 were missing for the 2021 cohort. There was no statistical difference in median total cases across cohorts (P = 0.52). For the first COVID-affected cohort of 2020, they reported significantly fewer total MIS cases in 2020 compared to pre-COVID fellows (median 92.5 vs. 135 pre-COVID, P = 0.002). However, there were no significant differences among the tracked oncologic MIS categories except a statistically significant increase in MIS retroperitoneal lymph node dissection between 2020 and 2021 COVID-affected cohorts (0 vs. 2, P = 0.033) CONCLUSIONS: The oncologic case volumes of the initial SUO fellows graduating during COVID pandemic were minimally affected. This national deidentified data is reassuring that oncologic training has not been impacted by widespread decreases in case volume. However, impacts on individuals, programs or geographic regions may have varied.

Effect of COVID-19 on Graduating Urology Resident Case Logs: Analysis of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education National Data Reports

OBJECTIVE

To assess the national case logs of the first graduating urologic resident cohorts to have trained during the COVID-19 pandemic for effects on surgical volumes.

METHODS

The nationally aggregated Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education urology resident case logs were obtained for graduates of academic years (AYs) 2015-2016 through 2020-2021. Case volume differences for tracked index categories were compared between AYs with a 1-way analysis of variance. Data were then combined into pre-COVID and COVID-affected resident cohorts and differences in average cases logged were analyzed with 2-tailed student's t-tests.

RESULTS

Graduating urology residents logged an average of 1322 (SD 24.8) cases over their residency during the examined period. Total cases had multiple statistical differences between AYs but the only index category with a statistically significant decrease for a COVID-affected AY compared to pre-COVID AY was pediatric majors: AY 2020-2021 logged fewer cases than AY 2015-2016 (53.9 vs 63.0, P = .004) and AY 2018-2019 (53.9 vs 61.2, P = .04). When aggregated into pre- and COVID-affected cohorts, both pediatric minor (123.4 vs 117.5, P = .049) and pediatric major (61.4 vs 56.8, P = .003) case averages decreased for the COVID-affected cohort of residents, but no adult index category decreased.

CONCLUSION

National graduating urology resident surgical volume for adult index categories was maintained through the pandemic. Pediatric cases saw a statistical decrease in volume of questionable clinical significance. This does not eliminate concern that individuals may have experienced a detrimental impact on their resident education.

The Association of Trainee Involvement in Radical Cystectomy With Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of trainee involvement in surgery on perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients undergoing RC for urothelial carcinoma between 2000 and 2015 at our institution. Trainee level was categorized as fellow, chief, senior and junior residents. Demographic, perioperative and oncological outcomes were recorded and compared between the groups. Specifically, operative time, 30-day complications, severe complications (Clavien III-V) and oncological outcomes (overall, cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 895 patients were included for study. On multivariable analysis, operative times were 30-40 minutes longer in procedures assisted by junior residents as compared to more senior trainees. Notably, trainee level was not associated with overall or severe complications on multivariable analyses. Similarly, trainee level was not associated with oncologic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

While cases assisted by junior residents had longer operative times, complication rates and oncological outcomes were comparable across trainee groups. Trainee level does not appear to have an impact on perioperative and oncological outcomes of RC for urothelial carcinoma.

Current status of urological training and differences between institutions

OBJECTIVES

Appropriate training of urology residents is important to secure not only high-quality patient care, but also the bright future of our specialty. We aimed to investigate residency training from the perspective of qualification and standardization and to evaluate surgical education, publication output, working conditions, future plans, and overall satisfaction, in a comprehensive way.

METHODS

We conducted a survey of urology chief residents/recent graduates in Turkey to identify differences between institutions and deficiencies in urology resident training. A total of 155 chief residents/recently graduated specialists were contacted by phone and a survey was completed.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 96.1%. Respondents had high proficiency in endourology (97.3%), similar to Canada and European countries. However, they reported a lack of proficiency in laparoscopy (28.9%) and functional urology (26.2%). Also, no one had completed a robotic procedure as first surgeon. A total of 75.2% respondents had no first author publication, and 10.1% had no first author abstract presentation. There was no significant difference between institution types with or without certification. There was a satisfaction rate of 87.2% among participants.

CONCLUSIONS

It was observed that qualified and standardized training could has not been achieved and the positive effects of certification have not been seen yet. There is a lack of modernization in all aspects of education, and there is no standardized curriculum addressing academic research. Therefore, there is a risk that future urologists will have insufficient skills. We hope this study serves as a guide for modernization and standardization in urology training.

Attitudes and access of Irish general surgery trainees to robotic surgical training

Background

Although the use of robotic-assisted surgery is now mainstream for procedures such as robotic prostatectomy and hysterectomy, its role in general surgery is less well established. Access to training in robotics for general surgery trainees in the Republic of Ireland is variable. Further, there are no data on specific attitudes of Irish trainees toward the role of robotics. We aimed to establish attitudes of Irish general surgery trainees toward the perceived utility of robotic surgery as well as access and satisfaction with training.

Methods

A survey was disseminated to trainees in the Republic of Ireland enrolled in a General Surgery training scheme via email and social media. Data collected included stage of training, intended subspecialty, interest in developing robotic skills, previous exposure to robotic surgery, satisfaction with current access to robotic training, and opinion on formally incorporating training in robotics into the general surgery curriculum.

Results

The response rate was 53.8%. Of these, 83% reported interest in training in robotics and 66% anticipated using the technology regularly in consultant practice. Previous exposure to robotic-assisted surgery was significantly predictive of interest in developing the skillset (P = .014). More than 71% of trainees reported that they were not satisfied with access to robotic training. Of those satisfied with access, 40% felt there was a role for incorporating robotic training into the curriculum compared to 68% of those dissatisfied.

Conclusion

Irish general surgery trainees perceive robotic-assisted surgery to be highly relevant to their future practice. There is an unmet need to provide additional training in the skillset.

•

Irish general surgery trainees perceive robotic surgery (RS) to be highly relevant to their future practice.

•

Access to training in RS is limited, and the majority of trainees desire more access to RS training.

•

Most trainees feel that there is a role for incorporating RS training into the curriculum.

Current practice in robotic surgery among pediatric urologists: A survey study

INTRODUCTION

Since its introduction, robotic surgery has gained most traction among urologists. Pediatric urologists have been slower to adopt the technology compared to their adult counterparts. Our objectives were to understand current practice patterns for robotic surgery among pediatric urologists, to identify perceived barriers, and to identify factors associated with the use of robotic surgery.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey was administered using REDCap to members of the Societies for Pediatric Urology (SPU) including questions about provider demographics and personal practice patterns. Comparisons were made using Pearson's Chi-Squared analysis.

RESULTS

Of 351 SPU members surveyed, 95 completed the survey (27%). Fifty-five (58%) reported performing robotic surgery, 40 (42%) reported not performing robotic surgery. Twenty-seven (28%) reported receiving robotic training in residency, 26 (27%) in fellowship, 34 (36%) in a robotics course, and 30 (32%) with proctored surgery. Cited reasons for not performing robotic surgery were lack of training, referring to practice partners, and lack of benefit. Of those performing robotic surgery, most reported performing 0-1 or 2-4 per month. Thirty-one (56%) reported having selection criteria for use of the robot: 26 (47%) cited an age cut-off, 12 (22%) a weight cut-off, and 14 (26%) an abdominal size cut-off. Eighteen (33%) reported using hidden incisions endoscopic surgery (HIdES) approach, and 40 (42%) reported using an assistant port. Factors associated with using the robot included surgeon age, years in practice, practice setting, having robotic training, and having practice partners who perform robotic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Practice variation exists in the use and application of robotic surgery among pediatric urologists. The main self-reported barriers to performing robotic surgery are lack of training, referring to practice partners, and no perceived benefit to robotic surgery. Factors associated with performing robotic surgery were surgeon age, years in practice, practice setting, and having practice partners perform robotic surgery.

Robotic surgery training during general surgery residency: a survey comparing attitudes towards a robotic training curriculum within general surgery, urology, and OBGYN residents and attendings

General surgery residents are increasingly exposed to robotic surgery during their training. However, there is no standardized robotic educational curriculum across United States residency programs. Prior to implementing a robotic surgery curriculum, we surveyed our residents and attendings to ascertain their attitude towards robotic surgery training in residency. An anonymous survey was distributed to all general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN), and urology residents, and their respective attending staff at our institution. Responses were compared between residents, attendings, and specialty. Twenty-six (72% response rate) general surgery residents and 18 (47%) subspecialty residents (OBGYN and urology) responded to the survey. Among attendings, 21 general surgery (32%) and 18 subspecialty staff (27%) responded. The majority of general surgery residents and attendings agreed that a robotic surgery curriculum should be implemented in the general surgery residency program (100 vs 86%, p = 0.04). Subspecialty residents also believed a formal curriculum should be implemented within their respective programs (100%). There was no statistically significant difference between general surgery and subspecialty resident responses. The majority of general surgery and subspecialty attendings responded that they would want a robotic surgery curriculum if they were currently residents (76 vs 94%, p = 0.12). The majority of general surgery residents and attendings at our institution believe a robotic surgery curriculum should be offered during residency. This attitude is similar to those of the subspecialty residents and attendings. A surgical education initiative should be developed to create a standardized training program to assure teaching of basic technical skills in robotic surgery before trainees enter clinical practice.

Evaluation of the urology residency training program in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the satisfaction of urology residents with the Saudi Board of Urology (SBU) Training Program and identifies areas of weakness and strength to improve the educational environment, surgical competency, and overall satisfaction of urology residents with the program.

METHODS

We administered an electronic self-made questionnaire that included two sections. One comprised demographic data (age, gender, weight, height, marital status, level of training, city of training, and center of training), while the other concerned SBU evaluation (satisfaction with different aspects of training, such as ways of assessment, mentors' feedback, surgical competency, research, and strengths and weaknesses of SBU).

RESULTS

The overall satisfaction of urology residency program was 28.8% while 44.2% of residents had a neutral response. The highest level of satisfaction with clinical and surgical practice was among graduates (56.9%) and Riyadh residents (45.1%). Furthermore, good work/life balance received the lowest level of satisfaction (5.2%) among senior residents, while good clinical experience received the highest level (62.7%) among the graduates. Residents reported a high exposure in endourology and pediatric urology, while transplant, reconstructive, and neurourology had the lowest exposure. Forty-two percent of respondents undertook research during their residency training, but most respondents (54%) did not publish any research papers during their training. Sixty-two percent of graduates felt that their training program did not prepare them adequately to perform well on the board examinations.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirmed that satisfaction of residents with the urology program process is variable according to the city of training. Having high satisfaction level in some cities reflects the improvement of urology training program after restructuring. We identified new areas in need of improvement, namely lack of mentorship, clear and formal assessment process, and variation of training process between central and peripheral programs.

Integration of Robotics in Urology Residency Programs: an Unchecked Technological Revolution

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the integration of robotics in urology residency programs and evaluate how it has impacted a graduates' level of surgical competence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgical technique training has shown a dramatic shift towards robotics with the most profound occurring in oncology. However, integration of robotics is not uniform across programs nor even among residents themselves. Robotics require graduates to garner a broader skill set within the same prescribed training time. Unfortunately, in this modern era, graduates are feeling more ill-equipped to start independent practice and show an increased need to pursue fellowship training to achieve technical proficiency. The dissemination of robotics in residency programs has gone unchecked. Modulating existing training structures through (1) development of procedure- and surgical technique-specific target metrics for graduation and (2) integration of a formalized robotic curriculum may improve the overall quality and outcome of the educational experience.

Contemporary considerations in the management and treatment of lower pole stones

The presence of lower pole stones poses a unique challenge due to the anatomical considerations involved in their management and treatment. Considerable research has been performed to determine the optimal strategy when faced with this highly relevant clinical scenario. Standard options for management include observation, shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Indeed, each approach confers a distinct set of risks and benefits, which must be placed into the context of patient preference and expected outcomes. The current state of practice reflects a combination of lessons learned from managing calculi not only in the lower pole, but also from other locations within the kidney as well.

Evaluation of Peri-operative Outcomes Associated With Resident Involvement on Tumor Resection and Renorrhaphy During Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perioperative outcomes of resident trainee involvement in tumor resection and renorrhaphy during robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 500 consecutive RAPN in a single surgeon prospectively maintained database. Cases with resident performed tumor resection and renorrhaphy (N = 71) were case matched on R.E.N.A.L. score and RAPN year using a greedy matching algorithm. Perioperative variables were compared to attending cases.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in high grade postoperative complications (resident: 3% vs attending: 6%, P = .68), positive margins (resident: 1% vs attending: 3%, P = .31), length of stay (resident: 2.0 vs attending: 2.0 days, P = .73), and 30 day readmission (resident: 7% vs attending: 11%, P = .56). However, residents had a statistically significant longer warm ischemia time (median 21 vs 15 minutes, P <.001), thus less likely to achieve trifecta (66% vs 85%, P = .02). Resident involvement had longer median operative time (197 vs 184 minutes, P = .03). No statistically significant difference in functional volume loss (P = .12) or surface intermediate base margin score (P = .66) between residents and attending was found. No difference in post-operative creatinine change was found at 1 day and 1 month (resident: 0.2 vs attending: 0.1 mg/dL, P = .4 and resident: 0.1 vs attending: 0.1 mg/dL, P = .6, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Supervised resident console involvement in tumor resection and renorrhaphy during RAPN is safe and does not increase rates of complications. Residents have longer median warm ischemia time compared to attending only cases, but this does not appear to impact post-operative renal function.

Feasibility and Utility of Mobile Applications for the Evaluation of Urology Residents' Surgical Competence

OBJECTIVE

To provide real-time assessment and feedback on the competency of urology residents' surgical skill via mobile applications and examine their feasibility and utility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two mobile application-based systems (SIMPL and myTIPreport) were sequentially implemented for the case-by-case assessment of residents' performance of surgical skills at a single institution. Data was collected regarding residents' perception of their feedback pre- and post-implementation of the applications. Faculty were surveyed after their implementation to determine their feasibility and utility.

RESULTS

297 individual evaluations were completed with SIMPL and 822 with myTIPreport over four and eleven months respectively. Post-implementation, residents showed significantly improved perceptions regarding the quantity and personalization of surgical skill feedback (P = .043 and .005 respectively). A majority (75%) of the faculty found the mobile applications feasible to use, an improvement compared to prior methods of resident evaluation, and would recommend continued use.

CONCLUSION

This study represents the first documented use of real-time surgical competency assessment in urology. The use of mobile applications to evaluate urology residents' surgical competency in clinical practice is both feasible and useful. Their use may allow for more individualized surgical skill teaching during training and for the verification of the surgical skills necessary to practice autonomously.

Educational program in onco-urology for young urologists: What are their needs?

PURPOSE

The emergence of new communication media such as digital contents are progressively replacing more traditional medias in the field of educational programs. Our purpose was to assess urologist in training aspirations regarding urological education.

METHODS

Members of a national urologist in training association were sent an anonymous online questionnaire regarding their medical formation in the field of urology. Responders interest for urological sub-specialty or education support (new tools and traditional support) were evaluated through a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Overall, 109 young urologists (26%) responded to the survey. Most of the respondents worked during their training in an academic hospital (n=89, 82%). The three favorite tools for training chosen by the responders were: videos, workshop or masterclass, and podcasts (responders very interested were respectively n=64 (58.7%), n=50 (45.9%), and n=49 (45%)). E-mail newsletters were reported as the less useful educational tool by participants (n=38, 34.9%). Participants were very interested in improving their surgical skills and their radiological knowledge. Responders who were the most attracted by PCa were much more looking to improve their systemic treatment and radiological knowledges.

CONCLUSIONS

Urologic-oncology was a priority regarding education for urologists in training. A majority of participants expressed a lack in their surgical education, revealing a reduced OR access and underlining utilization of new tools such as simulation. New digital contents such as social media or podcast achieved high interest for the participants, instead of more traditional media. There is a need that educational content evolve and uses new digital media.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Aligning Urology Residency Training With Real-World Workforce Needs

OBJECTIVE

Research suggests recently graduated urology residents do not feel ready for independent practice. We conducted a study to determine if Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) minimum case requirements, resident case logs, and graduating resident perceived readiness for practice are aligned with the procedural demand and needs of the current urology workforce.

DESIGN

Correlative study comparing the association between (1) workforce demand and ACGME case requirements, and (2) workforce demand and perceived resident competency. Three distinct datasets were used; (1) the 2017 Medicare Part B National Summary Data File; (2) the 2017 National Data Report published by the ACGME; and (3) a graduating resident survey from Okhunov et al. SETTING: N/A.

PARTICIPANTS

N/A.

RESULTS

In 2017, there were a total of 6,784,696 urologic cases performed through Medicare. We found nonsignificant positive associations between resident case logs (rho = 0.16, p = 0.5784), ACGME minimum procedure requirements (rho = 0.42, p = 0.1255), and Medicare procedural demand. Our 15 index procedures accounted for 21.1% (n = 1,431,775) of all Medicare cases, with a median number of 7706 procedures. Endopyelotomy was the least common procedure (n = 98), while cystoscopy was the most common (n = 980,623). Medicare case volume was positively correlated with graduating residents' procedural confidence (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001). We identified four categories with varied alignment of training and demand: (1) high volume and high confidence, (2) high volume and low confidence, (3) low volume and high confidence, and (4) low volume and low confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimizing urology residency training is time-sensitive and important. Using national Medicare data coupled with recently graduated urology resident survey results, we provide a guiding framework for improving the alignment of training with workforce demand. Informed by these results, we recommend altering training requirements to reflect these needs.

Innovations in Urologic Surgical Training

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize innovations in urologic surgical training in the past 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many assessment tools have been developed to objectively evaluate surgical skills and provide structured feedback to urologic trainees. A variety of simulation modalities (i.e., virtual/augmented reality, dry-lab, animal, and cadaver) have been utilized to facilitate the acquisition of surgical skills outside the high-stakes operating room environment. Three-dimensional printing has been used to create high-fidelity, immersive dry-lab models at a reasonable cost. Non-technical skills such as teamwork and decision-making have gained more attention. Structured surgical video review has been shown to improve surgical skills not only for trainees but also for qualified surgeons. Research and development in urologic surgical training has been active in the past 5 years. Despite these advances, there is still an unfulfilled need for a standardized surgical training program covering both technical and non-technical skills.

Ex Vivo Porcine Model for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Simulation at a High-Volume Tertiary Center: Resident Perception and Validation Assessment Using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills Tool

Introduction: With increased demands on surgeon productivity and outcomes, residency robotics training increasingly relies on simulations. The objective of this study is to assess the validity and effectiveness of an ex vivo porcine training model as a useful tool to improve surgical skill and confidence with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) among urology residents. Methods: A 2.5 cm circular area of ex vivo porcine kidneys was marked as the area of the tumor. Tumor excision and renorrhaphy was performed by trainees using a da Vinci Si robot. All residents ranging from postgraduate year (PGY) 2 to 5 participated in four training sessions during the 2017 to 2018 academic year. Each session was videorecorded and scored using the global evaluative assessment of robotic skills (GEARS) by faculty members. Results: Twelve residents completed the program. Initial mean GEARS score was 16.7 and improved by +1.4 with each subsequent session (p = 0.008). Initial mean excision, renorrhaphy, and total times were 8.2, 13.9, and 22.1 minutes, which improved by 1.6, 2.0, and 3.6 minutes, respectively (all p < 0.001). Residents' confidence at performing RAPN and robotic surgery increased after completing the courses (p = 0.012 and p < 0.001, respectively). Overall, residents rated that this program has greatly contributed to their skill (4/5) and confidence (4.1/5) in robotic surgery. Conclusions: An ex vivo porcine simulation model for RAPN and robotic surgery provides measurable improvement in GEARS score and reduction in procedural time, although significant differences for all PGY levels need to be confirmed with larger study participation. Adoption of this simulation in a urology residency curriculum may improve residents' skill and confidence in robotic surgery.

Robotic Surgery Training: Current Trends and Future Directions

The use of robotic surgery in urology has grown exponentially in the past 2 decades, but robotic surgery training has lagged behind. Most graduating residents report a lack of comfort independently performing common robotic urologic surgeries, despite an abundance of available resources. There is a general consensus on the key components of a comprehensive robotics curriculum, and well-validated tools have been developed to assess trainee competency. However, no single curriculum has emerged as the gold standard on which individual programs can build their own robotics curricula.

Cadaveric Penile Prosthesis Workshop training improves surgical confidence levels of urologists: South Asian Society for Sexual Medicine course survey

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the impact of South Asia's first cadaveric hands-on workshop on urologists' training in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.

METHODS

A total of 72 urologists/andrologists participated in the 2019 South Asian Society for Sexual Medicine Pre-congress Penile Prosthesis hands-on workshop. The workshop included 4 h of lectures and 2 h of hands-on cadaveric laboratory experience using three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used on self-rated procedural confidence levels, which proved the normality. A non-parametric McNemar test was used to examine the change in the number of correct answers.

RESULTS

Of those who attended the cadaver laboratory, just 45 who answered the survey both before and after the workshop were included for analysis. Significant objective improvements were noted in procedural knowledge test scores (44.30 ± 0.027 vs 72.44 ± 0.024, P < 0.05) and median surgical confidence levels (4 vs 3 and 2, P < 0.001) of the urologists after the completion of the workshop.

CONCLUSIONS

Cadaveric hands-on workshop training improves urologists' procedural knowledge and surgical confidence levels in carrying out three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. The feasibility of such workshops should be considered in increasing the surgical expertise of general urologists in prosthetic urology.

Exposure of Urology Residents to the Management of Urethral Strictures in Saudi Arabia: Should the Program for Postgraduates Be Customized?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the exposure and knowledge of urology residents in the management of urethral stricture (US) and to determine if they would be able to perform urethroplasty after graduation and whether urethroplasty should be included as a competency in the training program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An online survey was sent to all residents enrolled in any urology training program in Saudi Arabia. Fifty-eight (approximately 50%) of the 114 residents who were sent the survey provided responses.

RESULTS

Most of the residents (45 residents, 77.6%) who responded were exposed to fewer than ten cases of US during their last year of training. Fifty-six residents (96.6%) attended five or fewer urethroplasty procedures in their last year of training. Twenty-three (40%) residents did not attend any urethroplasty procedure in the last year. The most common procedures attended by the residents were minimally invasive treatments (89% cystoscopy with dilatation and 79% direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU)). Most residents responded that they would manage newly diagnosed 1 cm US with either cystoscopy and dilatation or with DVIU 53 (91%). For the first recurrence of US, 46 (79%) residents responded that they would still prefer dilatation or DVIU. For the second, third, and chronic recurrences of US, 20 (34.5%), 6 (10.3%), and 5 (8.6%) residents, respectively, responded that they would perform dilatation or DVIU. Residents had low expectations for the success rate of urethroplasty; only 32 (55.2%) residents thought it had a high success rate.

CONCLUSION

Urethroplasty is a specialized urological procedure, one that residents have variable exposure to. Privilege to perform such a procedure after graduating should be modified to ensure the best outcome for patients.

The Hidden Curriculum: Strategies for Preparing Residents for Practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this paper was to identify areas of importance in modern urology education that are not currently emphasized in current urological curricula.

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified curricular deficits in robotic surgical simulation, transgender health, leadership, business management, and social media training. Few practicing urologists feel comfortable managing transgender-specific needs, and most training programs do not adequately address transgender health. Urology programs also do not sufficiently emphasize topics in leadership, business management, or appropriate social media usage. With respect to simulation, while it is currently included in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) program requirements, it is currently under-utilized for training in robotic surgery. It is important for urologists to receive adequate training for the modern practice landscape. Where knowledge gaps among early practicing urologists arise, programs should adapt their curricula to address them.

Inter-Resident Variability in Urologic Operative Case Volumes Over Time: A Review of the ACGME Case Logs From 2009 to 2016

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of the changing landscape of urologic residency education and training on resident operative exposure and inter-resident variability.

METHODS

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for graduating urology chief residents were reviewed from Academic Year (AY) 2009-2010 to 2016-2017. Cases were stratified into the 4 ACGME categories - general urology, endourology, oncology, and reconstruction. Linear regression models analyzed the association between training year, volume, and type of cases performed. Inter-resident variability in case exposure was calculated by the difference between the ACGME reported 10th and 90th percentiles.

RESULTS

During the study period, the mean number of cases performed per resident was 1092 (standard deviation 32.7). Although there was no significant change in total case volume, there were changes within case categories. Endoscopic, retroperitoneal oncology, and male reconstruction case volume all increased significantly (Δ20.1%, Δ 5.1%, Δ 8.2%, respectively, all P < .05). This was balanced with a concomitant decrease in pelvic oncology and female reconstruction cases (Δ 10.0% and Δ 14.5%, respectively, both P < .05). There was a 27.8% increase in laparoscopic/robotic cases (P < .001). The ratio difference between the 10th percentile and 90th percentile ranged from a low of 2.5 for retroperitoneal oncology cases to a high of 5.2 for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

CONCLUSION

From AY2009-2010 to 2016-2017, residency case volume has remained constant, but there has been a change in types of cases performed and proliferation of minimally invasive techniques. Significant variability of inter-resident operative experience was noted.

Heterogeneity in urology teaching curricula among Canadian urology residency programs

INTRODUCTION

Postgraduate education is transitioning to a competency-based curriculum in an effort to standardize the quality of graduating trainees. The learning experiences and opportunities in each institution are likely variable, as no standard exists regarding the teaching curriculum offered through residency. The objective of this study is to examine the various teaching curricula among different Canadian urology residency programs and to identify which teaching modalities are prioritized by program directors.

METHODS

A 10-question anonymous survey was sent electronically to program directors at all 12 urology residency programs across Canada. Questions were designed to quantify the time allotted for teaching and to assess the various teaching session types prioritized by programs to ensure the successful training of their graduates. We assessed each program's perceived value of written exams, oral exams, didactic teaching session, and simulation sessions. Responses were assessed using a Likert-scale and a ranking format. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

Overall survey response rate from residency program directors was 75% (9/12). Sixty-seven percent of programs designated one day of teaching per week, whereas 33% split resident teaching over two days. Review of chapters directly from Campbell-Walsh Urology textbook were deemed the most valuable teaching session. Practice oral exams were also prioritized, whereas most programs felt that simulation labs contributed the least to residency education. All programs included review of the core urology textbook in their weekly teaching, while only 67% of programs included faculty-led didactic sessions and case presentations. Forty-four percent of programs included resident-led didactic sessions. Practice oral exams and simulation labs were the least commonly included teaching modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most program directors prioritize the review of chapters in the core urology textbook, we found significant heterogeneity in the teaching sessions prioritized and offered in current urology residency curricula. As we move to standardize the quality of graduating trainees, understanding the impact of variable educational opportunities on residency training may become increasingly important.

Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) performance among Quebec urology residents: A retrospective study from 2008-2019

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) performance of residents from four Canadian urology programs, based on resident and station characteristics. We also aimed to evaluate OSCE contents by station type and subspecialty.

METHODS

Scores of 109 postgraduate year (PGY)-3 to PGY-5 residents were retrospectively reviewed from 19 OSCEs from May 2008 to February 2019. Scores were grouped by station type/subspecialty, PGY level, medical graduate type (Canadian medical graduate [CMG], international medical graduate [IMG]), sex, and choice of fellowship/practice. Linear mixed modelling was performed to obtain least square means to account for repeated measures.

RESULTS

Score increases from PGY-3 to PGY-5 were significant for all station types and subspecialties (p≤0.001). Scores were similar between male and female residents, and between CMGs and IMGs, except in visual recognition examinations (VREs) (males: 44.3±1.0, females: 39.0±1.6, p=0.005; IMG: 47.3±1.7, CMG: 41.6±0.9, p=0.004). Relative to uro-oncology stations, scores were lower in andrology (p=0.010) and functional urology (p<0.001). More female residents chose pediatric (14.3% vs. 1.5%, p=0.024) and functional urology fellowships (17.9% vs. 2.9%, p=0.021). More male residents chose endourology/robotic fellowships (30.9% vs. 10.7%, p=0.042). No associations between subspecialty scores and choice of fellowship/practice were found. Oral stations and VREs were more frequent than telephone stations. Uro-oncology and pediatric urology were more frequent than other subspecialties.

CONCLUSIONS

Scores improved with higher PGY level. IMGs and male residents scored better in VREs. Scores were lower in functional urology. There was no correlation between subspecialty score and choice of fellowship/practice. Subspecialties and forms of evaluation were not equally represented.

National discrepancies in residency training of open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic enlargement: Redefining our gold standard

INTRODUCTION

In light of the recent Canadian Urological Association (CUA) and other urological associations' (America Urological Association, European Association of Urology) recommendations for the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), open simple prostatectomy (OSP) remains the recommended approach for large prostates with measured volumes over 80 cc. We sought to assess the current state of OSP and other BPH surgical training across Canadian urology residency programs and the use of guideline-recommended imagery prior to BPH surgery.

METHODS

A survey was distributed among Canadian urology program directors in June 2019. We identified the various surgical modalities available for the treatment of BPH offered by each program and obtained the annual number of OSP performed at each academic residency program. Additionally, we evaluated if preoperative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) of the prostate was routinely performed to obtain the prostate volume during patient counselling, as recommended by 2018 CUA guidelines.

RESULTS

All 13 program directors from the Canadian urology programs responded to our survey. OSP and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remain the most common across programs and are practiced in all centers. Greenlight photo-vaporization, bipolar TURP, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy were practiced in 76.8%, 69.2%, 23.1%, and 23.1% of centers, respectively. The mean number of OSP per academic training program was 4.7 cases annually. Moreover, only five (38%) academic centers routinely performed a preoperative TRUS to evaluate prostate volume for BPH counselling.

CONCLUSIONS

Although recognized and referenced as the BPH gold standard for the treatment of prostates over 80 cc, Canadian urology trainees' annual OSP exposure remains extremely limited. Considering the degree of importance given (category A) to the direct observation (of a minimum of five) of this intervention during residency training in the new Royal College's practice guidelines, it may be unrealistic to reach these national standards considering the annual case OSP volumes in Canadian academic urology faculties.