Advances and Missteps in Diagnosing Premature Ejaculation: Analysis and Future Directions

Updating, correcting, and calibrating the narrative about premature ejaculation

INTRODUCTION

The narrative surrounding premature ejaculation (PE) has developed and solidified over the past 25 years. Unfortunately, portions of that narrative are outdated and do not reflect more recent conceptualizations or empirical findings regarding this disorder.

OBJECTIVE

In this review we sought to identify existing narratives about PE in need of updating and to provide revised narratives based on the recent research literature.

METHOD

Five PE narratives in need of revision were identified, including: the prevalence of PE, age-related differences in PE prevalence, a validated ejaculation latency (EL) for diagnosing PE, differences between lifelong and acquired PE subtypes, and the application of PE definitions beyond penile-vaginal intercourse. Extensive literature searches provided information supporting both the original narrative and the need for a revised narrative based on both consideration of more recent studies and reinterpretation of studies conducted since the establishment of the original narratives.

RESULTS

For each selected topic, the prevailing narrative based on the extant literature was first presented, followed by discussion of accumulating evidence that challenges the existing narrative. Each section ends with a suggested revised PE narrative. In 2 instances, the revised narrative required significant corrections (eg, PE prevalence, validated EL for diagnosing PE); in 2 instances, it expanded on the existing narrative (eg, PE subtype differences, inclusion of partnered sexual activities beyond penile-vaginal intercourse); and in 2 other instances, it backed off prior conclusions that have since required rethinking (eg, age-related changes in PE, PE subtype differences). Finally, a brief review of the 3-pronged criteria for PE (EL, ejaculatory control, and bother/distress) is presented and discussed.

CONCLUSION

This review reiterates the dynamic state of research on PE and demonstrates the need for and value of ongoing research that not only addresses new issues surrounding this dysfunction but also challenges and revises some of the existing narratives about PE.

Do Ejaculation Latency and Other Sexual Measures Differ Between Men With Lifelong and Acquired Premature Ejaculation?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether men with lifelong vs acquired premature ejaculation (PE) subtypes differ on their estimated ejaculation latencies (EL) and related sexual, relationship, and behavioral parameters.

METHODS

Of 2679 men who responded to an online multinational survey about sexual health and met inclusion criteria, 540 reported "probable" or "definite" PE, as assessed by the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool. Lifelong and acquired PE subtypes were compared on multiple measures related to EL, as well as on sets of demographic, diagnostic, relationship, sexual behavioral, and sexual functioning measures during both partnered sex and masturbation.

RESULTS

Nearly 73% of men with PE in this sample reported the lifelong subtype. No differences emerged in EL measures between subtypes, even when parsed according to age. Specifically, men 37years or under with either definite lifelong or acquired PE reported ELs of 1.9 minutes (SD=1.3). For men over 37, lifelong ELs were 2.0 minutes (SD=1.3), acquired ELs 2.4 minutes (SD=1.4). While the lifelong subgroup was younger and reported lower erectile functioning, these differences occurred only in the probable PE group and not the definite PE group.

CONCLUSION

Our data do not support different EL criteria for men with acquired vs lifelong PE, as suggested by several professional definitions. Furthermore, differences in age and erectile functioning between the groups, often reported in clinical samples though not in our definite PE group, may be an artifact of the general health/patient characteristics that lead such men to seek medical assistance.

Altered reward processing in patients with lifelong premature ejaculation

Given that sexual behavior is usually pleasurable and highly rewarding, it is surprising that there is as yet no known research to empirically assess how premature ejaculation (PE) patients respond to the rewarding aspect of sexual behavior. This study was designed to address this issue by evaluating how these men respond to the anticipation and hedonic experience of sexual rewards in comparison to non-sexual rewards. Thirty lifelong PE patients and thirty healthy controls (HCs) performed the incentive delay task manipulating both erotic and monetary rewards. Compared to HCs, lifelong PE patients exhibited significantly faster RTs to erotic cues than to monetary cues during reward anticipation. Meanwhile, hedonic experience ratings after obtaining the actual reward showed that erotic rewards were rated as more pleasant than monetary rewards only by lifelong PE patients, which was driven by a decreased sensitivity to experienced monetary rewards in lifelong PE patients compared to HCs. These findings indicate the existence of dysfunctional reward processing in lifelong PE patients, which is characterized by increased incentive motivation elicited by sexual cues and reduced hedonic impact of nonsexual rewards. This study may offer an insightful clue regarding how PE is related to the abnormal regulation of the rewarding aspect of sexual behavior.

Progressive arousal: a new concept and definition for premature ejaculation

Background

Premature ejaculation (PE) is a nosologic entity with issues in its conceptualization and definition.

Aim

To understand if the altered sexual response in men with PE is in the orgasm phase, as currently assumed, or the arousal phase with difficulties in modulating, regulating, or decreasing sexual arousal.

Methods

Men were recruited who looked for help for PE and met the diagnostic criteria according to clinical standards. The participants completed a sociodemographic survey and the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool. They also performed a masturbation exercise with a maximum of 5 stops, with the intention of prolonging the arousal phase. The time of the exercise was measured from the beginning of genital masturbation to ejaculation.

Outcomes

We calculated the total time of the exercise, the median time at each start, and the number of dropouts. We performed a pairwise comparison analysis between starts and made a survival curve representing the percentage of men who remained in the exercise.

Results

A total of 481 men with PE participated (mean ± SD; age, 29.25 ± 8.72 years). We found that the expected median survival time until ejaculation was 317.00 seconds (95% CI, 288.34-345.65). However, the average time during stimulation decreased as the exercise progressed, and statistically significant differences were observed in their pairwise comparison (P < .001). Also, the chances of ejaculation increased as the exercise progressed, with 62.16% of the participants ejaculating before the end of the exercise. The results indicated increasing sexual arousal, where stops in stimulation were progressively less effective at maintaining ejaculation times at starts.

Clinical Implications

We showed that the arousal phase is altered in PE, not the orgasm phase, and this could finally have implications in the diagnosis and/or treatment of this condition.

Strengths and Limitations

The analysis of the times at starts and stops in a masturbation exercise in men with PE, had been barely addressed before. In the future, it would be important to verify the effect of stops during sexual intercourse and to incorporate a control group of men without PE.

Conclusions

We propose a new conceptualization and definition for PE: progressive arousal disorder is the inability to modulate, regulate, or decrease arousal during any sexual activity, even with brief stops during sexual stimulation, causing unwanted ejaculation.

The Tenuous Role of Distress in the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Unlike the other 2 criteria for diagnosing premature ejaculation (PE), namely lack of ejaculatory control and short ejaculation latency (EL), the role of bother/distress has received only minimal consideration and investigation.

AIM

The specific aim was to determine both why distress is included in the PE diagnosis and whether such inclusion is advantageous to achieving better diagnostic outcomes. To this end, the review explored the historical and theoretical underpinnings of the inclusion of "bother/ distress" in the diagnosis of PE, with reference to the larger role that distress has played in the diagnosis of mental disorders, in an attempt to understand the utility (or lack thereof) of this construct in making a PE diagnosis.

METHODS

We reviewed the role of bother/distress across current professional definitions for PE and then expanded this discussion to include the role of distress in other sexual dysfunctions. We then included a brief historical perspective regarding the role that distress has played in the diagnosis of PE. This discussion is followed by a deeper look at 2 nosological systems, namely DSM and ICD, to allow perspective on the inclusion of the bother/distress construct in the diagnosis of mental and behavioral disorders, including the assumptions/arguments put forward to include or exclude bother/distress as an important criterion underlying various professional assumptions.

OUTCOME

Determination of the value and/or need of including bother/distress as a necessary criterion for the diagnosis of PE.

RESULTS

Based on the research literature, bother/distress does not appear to be as critical for a PE diagnosis as either the lack of ejaculatory control or short EL. It is the weakest of the differences among men with and without PE, and recent evidence suggests that its inclusion is generally redundant with the severity of the 2 other criteria for PE, ejaculatory control and EL.

CLINICAL TRANSLATION

Bother/distress appears to serve little purpose in the diagnosis of PE yet its assessment may be important for the treatment strategy and for assessing treatment effectiveness.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This review did not provide a critical analysis of the literature regarding the role of bother/distress in PE, but rather focused on its potential value in understanding and diagnosing PE.

CONCLUSION

Although bother/distress appears to add little to the improvement of accuracy for a PE diagnosis, understanding and assessing the man's or couple's experience of distress has important implications for the treatment strategy and focus, as well as for assessing treatment success. Rowland DL, Cooper SE. The Tenuous Role of Distress in the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation: A Narrative Review. Sex Med 2022;XX:XXXXXX.