Chromosomal speciation: a reply

Speciation, natural selection, and networks: three historians versus theoretical population geneticists

In 1913, the geneticist William Bateson called for a halt in studies of genetic phenomena until evolutionary fundamentals had been sufficiently addressed at the molecular level. Nevertheless, in the 1960s, the theoretical population geneticists celebrated a "modern synthesis" of the teachings of Mendel and Darwin, with an exclusive role for natural selection in speciation. This was supported, albeit with minor reservations, by historians Mark Adams and William Provine, who taught it to generations of students. In subsequent decades, doubts were raised by molecular biologists and, despite the deep influence of various mentors, Adams and Provine noted serious anomalies and began to question traditional "just-so-stories." They were joined in challenging the genetic orthodoxy by a scientist-historian, Donald Forsdyke, who suggested that a "collective variation" postulated by Darwin's young research associate, George Romanes, and a mysterious "residue" postulated by Bateson, might relate to differences in short runs of DNA bases (oligonucleotides). The dispute between a small network of historians and a large network of geneticists can be understood in the context of national politics. Contrasts are drawn between democracies, where capturing the narrative makes reversal difficult, and dictatorships, where overthrow of a supportive dictator can result in rapid reversal.

When acting as a reproductive barrier for sympatric speciation, hybrid sterility can only be primary

Animal gametes unite to form a zygote that develops into an adult with gonads that, in turn, produce gametes. Interruption of this germinal cycle by prezygotic or postzygotic reproductive barriers can result in two cycles, each with the potential to evolve into a new species. When the speciation process is complete, members of each species are fully reproductively isolated from those of the other. During speciation a primary barrier may be supported and eventually superceded by a later-appearing secondary barrier. For those holding certain cases of prezygotic isolation to be primary (e.g. elephant cannot copulate with mouse), the onus is to show that they had not been preceded over evolutionary time by periods of postzygotic hybrid inviability (genically determined) or sterility (genically or chromosomally determined). Likewise, the onus is upon those holding cases of hybrid inviability to be primary (e.g. Dobzhansky–Muller epistatic incompatibilities) to show that they had not been preceded by periods, however brief, of hybrid sterility. The latter, when acting as a sympatric barrier causing reproductive isolation, can only be primary. In many cases, hybrid sterility may result from incompatibilities between parental chromosomes that attempt to pair during meiosis in the gonad of their offspring (Winge-Crowther-Bateson incompatibilities). While such incompatibilities have long been observed on a microscopic scale, there is growing evidence for a role of dispersed finer DNA sequence differences (i.e. in base k-mers).

Success of alignment-free oligonucleotide (k-mer) analysis confirms relative importance of genomes not genes in speciation and phylogeny

The utility of DNA sequence substrings (k-mers) in alignment-free phylogenetic classification, including that of bacteria and viruses, is increasingly recognized. However, its biological basis eludes many 21st century practitioners. A path from the 19th century recognition of the informational basis of heredity to the modern era can be discerned. Crick’s DNA ‘unpairing postulate’ predicted that recombinational pairing of homologous DNAs during meiosis would be mediated by short k-mers in the loops of stem-loop structures extruded from classical duplex helices. The complementary ‘kissing’ duplex loops – like tRNA anticodon–codon k-mer duplexes – would seed a more extensive pairing that would then extend until limited by lack of homology or other factors. Indeed, this became the principle behind alignment-based methods that assessed similarity by degree of DNA–DNA reassociation in vitro. These are now seen as less sensitive than alignment-free methods that are closely consistent, both theoretically and mechanistically, with chromosomal anti-recombination models for the initiation of divergence into new species. The analytical power of k-mer differences supports the theses that evolutionary advance sometimes serves the needs of nucleic acids (genomes) rather than proteins (genes), and that such differences can play a role in early speciation events.

Chromosomal polymorphisms in African vlei rats, Otomys irroratus (Muridae: Otomyini), detected by banding techniques and chromosome painting: inversions, centromeric shifts and diploid number variation

Pericentric inversions are important for evolutionary biology because of their potential role in speciation. They may result in reproductive isolation due to illegitimate pairing of homologues at meiosis which leads to the production of aneuploid gametes (containing deletions or duplications of chromosomal segments), and consequently mediate chromosomal divergence. In this study, we describe the prevalence of pericentric inversions in the African vlei rat, Otomys irroratus (OIR). The species is characterized by intraspecific chromosomal variation (2n = 23-32) across its distribution in southern Africa. Here, we analyzed 55 individuals collected from 7 localities in South Africa by G- and C-banding and chromosome painting with flow sorts of Myotomys unisulcatus. Of the 55 specimens that were analyzed, 47% contained inversions or centromeric shifts on 4 autosomes (OIR1, 4, 6 and 10) which were present singly in specimens (i.e. none of the specimens contained all 4 inversions concurrently). These inversions were found in both homozygous and heterozygous state over a wide geographic range suggesting that they are floating polymorphisms. Given the potential role of inversions in post-mating isolation (through production of aneuploid gametes), the prevalence of inversions as floating polymorphisms in the vlei rats suggests that they are probably retained in the population through suppression of recombination in the inverted regions of the chromosomes.

Molecular sex: The importance of base composition rather than homology when nucleic acids hybridize

On learning that nucleic acid hybridization had been achieved in a test tube, Huxley hailed the discovery of "molecular sex." The description was apt, since sex involves recombination, which requires hybridization that, in turn, depends on a successful homology search. Conversely, when the homology search fails, recombination fails. In yeast, this failure has been attributed to "simple sequence divergence." But sequence divergence does not impair nucleic acid hybridization simply. Most natural single-stranded nucleic acids are predisposed to adopt higher-order structures containing stem-loops. Tomizawa showed that the rate-limiting step in the hybridization of single-stranded sequences is an initial "kissing" exploration between complementary loops, which must first be appropriately extruded and aligned. Successful duplex formation requires successful synchronization of matching higher-ordered structures, which depends, not so much on the degree of similarity between their base sequences as on the closeness of their base compositions (GC%). In these terms, we can understand how the anti-recombinational effect of GC% differences supports the duplication both of genes within a genome and of genomes within a genus (speciation).

Heredity as transmission of information: Butlerian 'Intelligent Design.'

In the 1870s, Ewald Hering and Samuel Butler provided what was, for that time, a scientifically coherent foundation for the Lamarckist view that positive adaptations to the environment acquired during an individual's lifetime can be transmitted to the offspring. Observing that heredity was a form of memory (involving stored information), they distinguished what are now known as genotype and phenotype and proposed that cognitive abilities present in the the most elementary organisms might mediate a transmission of acquired adaptations. While compatible with the then-available facts of evolution, this Butlerian version of 'intelligent design' was rendered less credible by subsequent appreciations of the discrete (discontinuous) inheritance of many phenotypic characters (Mendelism) and of the separation of germ line from soma (Weismanism). However, it can now be seen that 21st-century bioinformatics has 19th-century roots.

Genomic conflict settled in favour of the species rather than the gene at extreme GC percentage values

Wada and colleagues have shown that, whether prokaryotic or eukaryotic, each gene has a "homostabilising propensity" to adopt a relatively uniform GC percentage (GC%). Accordingly, each gene can be viewed as a "microisochore" occupying a discrete GC% niche of relatively uniform base composition amongst its fellow genes. Although first, second and third codon positions usually differ in GC%, each position tends to maintain a uniform, gene-specific GC% value. Thus, within a genome, genic GC% values can cover a wide range. This is most evident at third codon positions, which are least constrained by amino acid encoding needs. In 1991, Wada and colleagues further noted that, within a phylogenetic group, genomic GC% values can also cover a wide range. This is again most evident at third codon positions. Thus, the dispersion of GC% values among genes within a genome matches the dispersion of GC% values among genomes within a phylogenetic group. Wada described the context-independence of plots of different codon position GC% values against total GC% as a "universal" characteristic. Several studies relate this to recombination. We have confirmed that third codon positions usually relate more to the genes that contain them than to the species. However, in genomes with extreme GC% values (low or high), third codon positions tend to maintain a constant GC%, thus relating more to the species than to the genes that contain them. Genes in an extreme-GC% genome collectively span a smaller GC% range, and mainly rely on first and second codon positions for differentiation as "microisochores". Our results are consistent with the view that differences in GC% serve to recombinationally isolate both genome sectors (facilitating gene duplication) and genomes (facilitating genome duplication, e.g. speciation). In intermediate-GC% genomes, conflict between the needs of the species and the needs of individual genes within that species is minimal. However, in extreme-GC% genomes there is a conflict, which is settled in favour of the species (i.e. group selection) rather than in favour of the gene (genic selection).

Coevolution of DNA-interacting proteins and genome "dialect"

Several species-specific characteristics of genome organization that are superimposed on its coding aspects were proposed earlier, including genome signature (GS), genome accent, and compositional spectrum (CS). These notions could be considered as representatives of genome dialect (GD). We measured within the Proteobacteria some GD representatives, the relative abundance of dinucleotides or GS, the profiles of occurrence of 10 nucleotide words (CS), and the profiles of occurrence of 20 nucleotide words, using a degenerate two-letter alphabet (purine-pyrimidine compositional spectra [PPCS]). Here, we show that the evolutionary distances between DNA repair and recombination orthologous enzymes (especially those of the nucleotide excision repair system) are highly correlated with PPCS and GS distances. Orthologous proteins involved in structural or metabolic processes (control group) have significantly lower correlations of their evolutionary distances with the PPCS and GS distances. We hypothesize that the high correlation of the evolutionary distances of the DNA repair orthologous enzymes with their GD is a result of the coevolution of the DNA repair enzymes' structures and GDs. Species GDs could be substantially influenced by the function of DNA polymerase I (the bacterial major DNA repair polymerase). This might cause the correlation of species GDs differentiation with evolutionary changes of species DNA polymerase I. Simultaneously, the structures of DNA repair-recombination enzymes might be evolutionarily sensitive and responsive to changes in the structure of their substrate-the DNA (including those that are represented by GD differentiation). We further discuss the rationale and mechanisms of the hypothesized coevolution. We suggest that stress might be an important cause of changes in the repair-recombination genes and the GD and the trigger of the aforementioned coevolution process. Other triggers might be massive horizontal gene transfer and ecological selection.