Infection-Related Mortality in Adults and Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: An Australian Registry Report

Retrospective genome-oriented analysis reveals low transmission rate of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from contaminated toilets at a bone marrow transplant unit

BACKGROUND

Prevention of toilet-to-patient transmission of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR PA) poses management-related challenges at many bone marrow transplant units (BMTUs).

AIM

To conduct a longitudinal retrospective analysis of the toilet-to-patient transmission rate for MDR PA under existing infection control (IC) measures at a BMTU with persistent MDR PA toilet colonization.

METHODS

The local IC bundle comprised: (1) patient education regarding IC; (2) routine patient screening; (3) toilet flushing volume of 9 L; (4) bromination of toilet water tanks, and (5) toilet decontamination using hydrogen peroxide. Toilet water was sampled periodically between 2016 and 2021 (minimum every three months: 26 intervals). Upon MDR PA detection, disinfection and re-sampling were repeated until ≤3 cfu/100 mL was reached. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed retrospectively on all available MDR PA isolates (90 out of 117 positive environmental samples, 10 out of 14 patients, including nine nosocomial).

FINDINGS

WGS of patient isolates identified six sequence types (STs), with ST235/CT1352/FIM-1 and ST309/CT3049/no-carbapenemase being predominant (three isolates each). Environmental sampling consistently identified MDR PA ST235 (65.5% ST235/CT1352/FIM-1), showing low genetic diversity (difference of ≤29 alleles by core-genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST)). This indicates that direct toilet-to-patient transmission was infrequent although MDR PA was widespread (detection on 79 occasions, detection in every toilet). Only three MDR PA patient isolates can be attributed to the ST235/CT1352/FIM-1 toilet MRD PA population over six years.

CONCLUSION

Stringent targeted toilet disinfection can reduce the potential risk for MDR PA acquisition by patients.

Review of advanced practice nurse role in infection throughout the hematopoietic stem cell transplant journey

BACKGROUND

Prolonged periods of immunosuppression during hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) can result in serious infectious complications and contribute to transplant-related morbidity and mortality. Adherence to standardized pre and postinfection screening guidelines, prescribed medications, and early identification of infectious symptoms through comprehensive patient and family education are crucial to minimizing infectious complications. Advanced practice nurses (APNs) are key members of the multidisciplinary care team in the HSCT specialty, maintaining a specialized skillset and scope of practice which includes a holistic based, preventative medicine and risk mitigation approach.

METHODS

This review sought to describe the role of the APN in HSCT care and to further examine existing APN led models of care which focus on infection prevention and education throughout the HSCT treatment journey.

RESULTS

No studies specifically examined the APN role in infectious diseases risk assessment, screening, and management throughout the HSCT journey were identified throughout our review, however, there was considerable evidence to demonstrate the benefits of APN led care in the oncology and solid organ transplantation specialty which led to improvements in continuity of care, overall patient outcomes, and multidisciplinary team collaboration. The key themes identified in our review, were the role of the APN in the delivery of comprehensive patient and family education, the role of the APN in supporting, mentoring, and educating junior medical and nursing teams, the collaboration between the APN and the multidisciplinary care team, and the role of the APN in prompt recognition, triage, and management of treatment related complications, such as infection.

Pre-Transplantation Strategies for Infectious Disease Mitigation and Prevention

Pediatric Infectious Disease (ID) clinicians play a critical role in helping prevent and mitigate infectious risks in children peri- and post-transplantation. Prevention starts during the pre-transplant evaluation and persists throughout the solid organ transplant and hematopoietic cell transplant continuum. The pre-transplant evaluation is an opportunity to screen for latent infections, plan preventative strategies, optimize immunizations, and discuss risk mitigation practices. An ideal pre-transplant evaluation establishes a relationship with the family that further promotes post-transplant infectious risk reduction. This manuscript builds on shared pediatric ID prevention strategies, introduces updated ID testing recommendations for transplant donors/candidates, highlights emerging data, and identifies ongoing knowledge gaps that are potential areas of research.

Consensus position statement on advancing the standardised reporting of infection events in immunocompromised patients

Patients can be immunocompromised from a diverse range of disease and treatment factors, including malignancies, autoimmune disorders and their treatments, and organ and stem-cell transplantation. Infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, and the disease treatment landscape is continually evolving. Despite being a critical but preventable and curable adverse event, the reporting of infection events in randomised trials lacks sufficient detail while inconsistency of categorisation and definition of infections in observational and registry studies limits comparability and future pooling of data. A core reporting dataset consisting of category, site, severity, organism, and endpoints was developed as a minimum standard for reporting of infection events in immunocompromised patients across study types. Further additional information is recommended depending on study type. The standardised reporting of infectious events and attributable complications in immunocompromised patients will improve diagnostic, treatment, and prevention approaches and facilitate future research in this patient group.

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia at high risk of serious infections: Exploring pros and cons

BACKGROUND

The use of fluoroquinolones to prevent infections in neutropenic patients with cancer or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a controversial issue, with international guidelines providing conflicting recommendations. Although potential benefits are clear, concerns revolve around efficacy, potential harms, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) implications.

DISCUSSION

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduces neutropenic fever (NF) bloodstream infections and other serious bacterial infections, based on evidence from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in adults and children. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis may also reduce infection-related morbidity and healthcare costs; however, evidence is conflicting. Adverse effects of fluoroquinolones are well recognized in the general population; however, studies in the cancer cohort where it is used for a defined period of neutropenia have not reflected this. The largest concern for routine use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis remains AMR, as many, but not all, observational studies have found that fluoroquinolone prophylaxis might increase the risk of AMR, and some studies have suggested negative impacts on patient outcomes as a result.

CONCLUSIONS

The debate surrounding fluoroquinolone prophylaxis calls for individualized risk assessment based on patient characteristics and local AMR patterns, and prophylaxis should be restricted to patients at the highest risk of serious infection during the highest risk periods to ensure that the risk-benefit analysis is in favor of individual and community benefit. More research is needed to address important unanswered questions about fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with cancer or receiving HSCT.

Expanding the scope of the infectious diseases pharmacist in HCT: Beyond antimicrobial stewardship

BACKGROUND

Infectious disease (ID) pharmacists and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs are integral to the infection management of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients demonstrating effective implementation of clinical pathways, de-escalation of empirical antibiotics for febrile neutropenia (FN), allergy assessments, and use of rapid diagnostic testing. The HCT procedure is complex, dynamic, and a high risk for infectious complications. Therefore, there is an important role for an ID and AMS pharmacist to collaborate with the primary treating team, with ongoing care, involving the optimal individual patient prophylactic, pre-emptive and treatment management of infections in this high-risk population.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights key factors for consideration of ID/AMS Pharmacists in relation to HCT, including important aspects in the evaluation of infection risk prior to transplant, risk from donor sources, length of, and changes in immunosuppression, and potential drug-drug interactions from other essential supportive care therapies.

Infections and risk factors for infection-related mortality after pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Mexico: A single center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To identify the type of infections and risk factors for infection-related mortality (IRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients <16 years of age treated in 2010-2019 was conducted. Unadjusted hazard ratios (HR) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using Cox regression. Cumulative incidence was calculated.

RESULTS

Data for 99 pediatric patients were analyzed. The myeloablative conditioning was the most used regimen (78.8%) and the hematopoietic stem cell source was predominantly peripheral blood (80.8%). Primary graft failure occurred in 19.2% of patients. Frequency of acute graft-versus-host disease was 46.5%. Total of 136 infectious events was recorded, the most common of which were bacterial (76.4%) followed by viral infection (15.5%) and then fungal infection (8.1%). The best predictors for infection subtypes where the following: a) for bacterial infection (the age groups of 10.1-15 years: aHR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.62-6.85 and. >15 years: aHR = 3.34; 95% CI: 1.18-9.45); b) for viral infection (graft versus host disease: aHR = 5.36; 95% CI: 1.62-17.68), however, for fungal infection statistically significant predictors were not identified. Related mortality was 30% (n = 12). Increased risk for infection-related mortality was observed in patients with unrelated donor and umbilical cord stem cells recipients (HR = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.00-9.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Frequencies of infections and infection-related mortality appear to be similar to those reported. Unrelated donors and stem cells from umbilical cord recipients were associated with a high risk of mortality.

Mucositis and Infection in Hematology Patients

Survival in patients with hematological malignancies has improved over the years, both due to major developments in anticancer treatment, as well as in supportive care. Nevertheless, important and debilitating complications of intensive treatment regimens still frequently occur, including mucositis, fever and bloodstream infections. Exploring potential interacting mechanisms and directed therapies to counteract mucosal barrier injury is of the utmost importance if we are to continue to improve care for this increasingly growing patient population. In this perspective, I highlight recent advances in our understanding of the relation of mucositis and infection.

Infection-related mortality after HLA-identical and haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation using reduced-intensity conditioning in an outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Despite the improvements in supportive care for allogeneic-hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients, infectious complications and infection-related mortality (IRM) continue to be a major issue for transplantation centers.

METHODS

We herein report the infectious complications and IRM of 107 and 89 patients that underwent haploidentical (haplo-HCT) or HLA-identical HCT at a tertiary referral center during 2013-2020. Patients in the haplo-HCT group received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), and all received reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.

RESULTS

More haplo-HCT recipients presented severe infections in the pre-engraftment period (22.4% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.003). Viral (14.9% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.016) and fungal (12.1% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.003) etiologies were more common in this period in this group. The 100-day and 2-year cumulative incidence of IRM was 15% and 21% for the haplo-HCT and 5.6% and 17% for the HLA-identical group; no significant differences were observed between the groups. Fungal pathogens mainly contributed to IRM (33.3%). Infections were the most common cause of mortality (40/81, 49.4%). There were significant differences in donor/recipient CMV serostatus between transplant groups (0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in IRM were observed based on allo-HCT type, with more haplo-HCT patients suffering from severe infections in the pre-engraftment period. Studies to assess future prevention, diagnostic, and treatment strategies to reduce IRM are warranted.

Letermovir as Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in a Pediatric Cohort: A Retrospective Analysis

Letermovir is an attractive cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylactic agent, but published data in children are scarce. This retrospective chart review aimed to describe our experience using letermovir as CMV prophylaxis in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Pediatric patients (age <20 years) undergoing allogeneic HCT and receiving letermovir prophylaxis in the Mayo Clinic Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Program were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective chart review. Medical records were reviewed to evaluate letermovir dosing, CMV levels, laboratory values, and reports of adverse effects. Between October 2020 and April 2022, 9 patients age 4 to 19 years undergoing allogeneic HCT in the Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Program received letermovir prophylaxis, either 240 mg or 480 mg daily at a mean and median dose of 10 mg/kg/day. Letermovir was crushed and administered via nasogastric tube in 4 of 9 patients. Two patients received letermovir for secondary CMV prophylaxis after initial treatment with ganciclovir/valganciclovir, and the remaining 7 received letermovir for primary prophylaxis. One patient, a 20-kg 6-year-old female receiving 240 mg (12 mg/kg), experienced low-level CMV viremia while on letermovir. No other patients experienced CMV reactivation while on letermovir prophylaxis. In 2 patients, transient mild transaminitis was noted within the first weeks of letermovir therapy, which resolved without intervention, and its relationship to letermovir could not be clearly established. Letermovir administration was feasible and well tolerated as CMV prophylaxis in our small cohort of pediatric patients undergoing HCT. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to confirm the safety and efficacy of letermovir in children. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Optimizing antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A cohort study of two different approaches

BACKGROUND

Limited consensus exists on the optimal use of antifungal agents to prevent invasive fungal infection in the early post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) period, particularly when patients cannot tolerate oral medication administration.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective observational cohort study to assess the tolerability, efficacy, and cost of a new antifungal prophylaxis pathway at a major tertiary alloHCT centre. Patients aged ≥16 years who underwent alloHCT between February 2018 and October 2019 (cohort 1) or between April 2020 and November 2021 (cohort 2) were included. In both cohorts, first line prophylactic therapy was oral posaconazole. The second line drugs where oral therapy was unable to be administered were intravenous voriconazole (cohort 1) versus intravenous posaconazole (cohort 2).

RESULTS

There were 142 patients enrolled in the study, 71 in each cohort. The proportion of patients remaining on first-line prophylaxis or progressing to second-, third-, and fourth-line options was 22.5%, 39.4%, 29.6%, and 8.5% in cohort 1 and 39.4%, 59.2%, 1.4%, and 0% in cohort 2, respectively. The frequency of neuropsychiatric adverse events was significantly higher in cohort 1 compared to cohort 2 (49.3% vs. 19.8%, p = .0004). Occurrence of proven and probable fungal infections was not significantly different between cohorts. Antifungal drug expenditure was $359 935 (AUD) more in cohort 1 ($830 486 AUD) compared to cohort 2 ($477 149 AUD).

CONCLUSION

The antifungal prophylaxis pathway used in cohort 2 resulted in reduced antifungal-associated adverse effects, less patients requiring progression to 3rd and 4th line prophylaxis and reduced antifungal drug costs.

Insights into Modern Therapeutic Approaches in Pediatric Acute Leukemias

Pediatric cancers predominantly constitute lymphomas and leukemias. Recently, our knowledge and awareness about genetic diversities, and their consequences in these diseases, have greatly expanded. Modern solutions are focused on mobilizing and impacting a patient’s immune system. Strategies to stimulate the immune system, to prime an antitumor response, are of intense interest. Amid those types of therapies are chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody–drug conjugates (ADC), which have already been approved in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), i.e., NOD-like receptors (NLRs), Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and several kinds of therapy antibodies are well on their way to showing significant benefits for patients with these diseases. This review summarizes the current knowledge of modern methods used in selected pediatric malignancies and presents therapies that may hold promise for the future.