Longitudinal Patient Reported Outcomes with CAR-T Cell Therapy Versus Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

Cellular therapy in lymphoma

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has had a dramatic impact on the natural history and survival of patients with high-risk B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Accompanying this success has been the development of new fields of medicine and investigation into toxicity risks and mitigation therapies, mechanisms of resistance and the development of novel and next generation products and strategies in order to address relapse, and issues related to global access and health care economics. This article is a survey of each of these areas as it pertains to the rapidly evolving field of CAR T-cell therapy, written by an International community of lymphoma experts, who also happen to be women.

Patient-reported outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Few studies evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients with hematologic malignancies receiving with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits of CAR-T cell therapies focused on PROs. A systematic literature searched from PubMed, Cochrane, and the Web of Science from inception to September 2023. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers based on pre-specified criteria. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias checklist was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. The random-effects model was employed to calculate the combined effect and 95% Confidence intervals. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024586706). We identified 20,110 studies. Of those, 15 studies with 16 different PRO measures (PROMs) were included in the meta-analysis. CAR-T cell therapy improved PROs in the six domains of general health status, pain, fatigue, depression, social function, and cognitive function: from the general health status (SMD: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.81) to cognitive function (SMD: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.37). The current meta-analysis shows that CAR-T cell therapy produces clinically meaningful differences in PROs. These results suggest that the professional perspective and patient values and preferences should be weighed equally when considering CAR-T cell therapy for hematologic malignancies.

In Pursuit of Optimal Outcomes: A Framework for Quality Standards in Immune Effector Cell Therapy

Immune effector cell (IEC) therapy represents a transformative advancement in oncology, leveraging the immune system to combat various malignancies. This article outlines a comprehensive framework for establishing and maintaining quality standards in IEC therapy amidst rapid scientific and clinical advancements. We emphasize the integration of structured process measures, robust quality assurance, and meticulous outcome evaluation to ensure treatment efficacy and safety. Key components include multidisciplinary expertise, stringent accreditation protocols, and advanced data management systems, which facilitate standardized reporting and continual innovation. The collaborative effort among stakeholders-ranging from patients and healthcare providers to regulatory bodies-is crucial in delivering high-quality IEC therapies. This framework aims to enhance patient outcomes and cement the role of IEC therapy as a cornerstone of modern oncology, promoting continuous improvement and adherence to high standards across the therapeutic spectrum.

Development of a conceptual framework for an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system measuring symptoms and impacts of CAR T-cell therapies in patients with haematological malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is associated with potentially severe toxicities that create a substantial burden for patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offer valuable insights into symptoms, functioning, and other complex constructs of interest. In this Review, we aimed to identify symptom and impact concepts important to patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy, construct a conceptual framework for an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system, and identify timepoints to capture PRO data for CAR T-cell therapies. We searched MEDLINE (OVID) and Web of Science (Clarivate) for articles in English published from Aug 30, 2017, to March 2, 2023. No restrictions on study design were applied. 178 symptoms or constructs were extracted from 44 articles reporting PRO collection in adults with haematological malignancies receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Six health-care professionals and 11 patients and caregiver partners verified construct relevance to clinical management and lived experience, respectively. 109 constructs were sorted according to the four domains of conceptual framework: symptom burden, impact of disease and treatment, tolerability, and health-related quality of life. The identification of concepts beyond symptom burden underscores the importance of PRO measurement for long-term monitoring, to align outcomes with patient concerns. The framework will facilitate PRO measure selection for systematic gathering of PROs from individuals with haematological malignancies receiving CAR T-cell therapies.

Prospective Assessment of Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Toxicities Over the First Year After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed survival outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), but it is associated with a variety of side effects. This study examined changes in patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and toxicities, as well as risk factors for worse QoL and toxicities, in the first year after treatment. Patients with LBCL completed questionnaires assessing QoL and toxicity severity before infusion, and 90, 180, and 360 days after infusion. Mixed models were used to examine changes in QoL and toxicities over time, and clinical moderators of change in QoL and toxicities. Patients reported improvements in physical functioning and fatigue in the year after treatment (P values <.01), but there were no changes in pain, anxiety, or depression over time. Patients with active disease at day 90 reported more physical dysfunction at all postinfusion timepoints (Ps ≤ .01) compared to patients who responded to treatment. Similarly, patients with active disease at day 90 reported worsening depression over time, such that at day 360, depressive symptoms were worse for patients with active disease than patients without active disease (P = .02). Patients treated with 4+ lines of prior therapy reported worsening pain and anxiety over time, such that at day 360, both pain and anxiety were significantly worse for patients previously treated with 4 of more lines of therapy than patients treated with fewer lines of therapy (Ps ≤ .01). Regarding toxicities, patients reported decreasing overall toxicity burden up to day 180, with subsequent worsening at day 360 (P = .02). Most patients reported at least one or two grade 2 toxicities at each timepoint. Patients demonstrated unchanging or improved QoL after treatment with CAR T-cell therapy, but active disease and greater prior lines of therapy were associated with worse QoL outcomes over time. Toxicity severity also improved during the first 6 months post-treatment, but worsened thereafter, particularly among patients with active disease after treatment.

Feasibility of collecting longitudinal patient-reported outcomes in individuals with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy

PURPOSE

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy has shown clinical efficacy in refractory and relapsed large B-cell lymphomas, but is associated with serious acute and long-term toxicities. To understand the patient perspective, we measured a patient-reported outcome (PRO), specifically, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), at multiple time points over one year.

METHODS

This was a prospective feasibility study of a cohort of patients who were eligible for standard of care CART therapy, tisagenlecleucel. Demographic data and disease characteristics were collected. HRQoL was measured using FACT-Lym at baseline, and months 1, 3, 6 and 12. FACT-Lym includes FACT-G (physical, social, emotional and functional well-being domains), plus a lymphoma subscale.

RESULTS

Thirty-four of 35 patients approached, consented to participate. Two of them did not receive their infusion due to progressive disease. 50% were female and median age was 62 (23-77). Twenty-nine patients (91%) completed baseline FACT-Lym and 20 of 21 (95%) eligible patients completed 12-month FACT-Lym. 52% completed all 4 post-baseline FACT-Lym measures. Exploratory analyses for changes in FACT-Lym scores are reported.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to measure longitudinal PROs in patients who receive CART therapy. This study will inform future studies in evaluating the patient perspective on CART therapy.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Treatment Tolerability in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

There has been a rapid expansion of novel therapeutics for hematologic malignancies, including monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and cellular therapies, which confer different treatment-related toxicities and symptomatic adverse events (AEs) than traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies. Given that patients with blood cancers are living longer with these newer treatments, with some therapies requiring indefinite or time-intensive administration, consideration of patient-reported tolerability and effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are increasingly relevant. Historically, clinical trials have focused on the efficacy and safety of therapies. While related to safety and not intended to replace it, "treatment tolerability" is a distinct construct defined as the extent to which symptomatic and nonsymptomatic AEs impact a patient's ability and desire to continue with current treatment dosing, which also encompasses how patients feel and function while undergoing anticancer therapies. Assessment of tolerability requires the systematic and rigorous measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this review, we discuss the introduction of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) into hematology clinical trials and how PROs inform the measurement of treatment tolerability, including symptomatic adverse events, physical and role functioning, and overall side effect burden. Selected PROMs for measurement of these core tolerability domains are outlined, with a focus on novel analytic tools that have been developed for the longitudinal analysis of tolerability data. Further, we outline ongoing studies to accelerate integration of PROs throughout the cancer care spectrum, from early-stage drug development to routine clinical care, with the goal of improving both HRQoL and survival.

Health-related quality of life in patients with hematologic malignancies treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: review and current progress

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the care of patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell-derived hematologic malignancies. To date, six CAR T-cell therapies, targeting either CD19 or B-cell maturation antigen, have received regulatory approval. Along with the promising survival benefit, CAR T-cell therapy is associated with potentially life-threatening adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. While clinical trials evaluating CAR T-cell therapy consistently report the incidence of these adverse events, most trials do not collect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data. As such, the impact of the CAR T-cell therapy process and related adverse events on the physical and psychological well-being of patients remains uncertain. HRQoL and other patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies are of utmost importance, as individuals may have unmet needs and a high demand for tolerable therapy if a cure is not obtained. In addition, it is important to standardize methods of data collection to better assess the impact of CAR T-cell therapy on quality of life, optimize patients' care and costs, and enable comparisons between different studies. We conducted a literature search up to June 2023 to identify the HRQoL tools used in clinical trials and in real-world studies investigating CAR T-cell therapy in patients with lymphomas or leukemias. In the present comprehensive review, we summarize the most commonly used CAR T-cell specific and non-specific HRQoL tools and discuss how the use of HRQoL and other PRO tools may be optimized.

Long-term neurocognitive effects of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: Integrating assessments into nursing practice

Chimeric antigen receptor t-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a newly evolving therapy with well-known acute neurotoxic effects. While the long-term neurotoxic effects of this therapy are under-researched, they exist in subsets of the post-treatment population. Nurses can focus on assessments before and after CAR-T therapy to determine the degree to which these neurotoxic effects progress. These assessments include subjective and objective tools, as well as an understanding of risk factors associated with a higher degree of adverse cognitive events. By utilizing current research, hematological nurses can advocate for this unmet need to be monitored and intervened upon to improve patient outcomes.

Adverse Event Reporting in Cancer Clinical Trials: Incorporating Patient-Reported Methods. A Systematic Scoping Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The history of clinical trials is fraught with unethical practices. Since 1945, robust frameworks have evolved to standardise the collection and reporting of safety data, most notably, the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) from the National Cancer Institute; used by investigators to report side effects experienced by participants. As medicine moves into the patient-centred model, interest has been growing to collect data on adverse events directly from participants (patient-reported adverse events). The aim of this systematic scoping review was to investigate the inclusion of patient-reported adverse event data within safety/tolerability analyses and explore the collection and reporting of patient-reported adverse event data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A database search was undertaken and the Covidence platform was used to manage the review; results were analysed descriptively. Sixty-eight studies were included in the analysis. An increase in the number of studies that incorporate patient-reported adverse event data was seen by year. Seventy instruments were used for the collection of patient-reported adverse event data with recall period, mode, frequency and site of administration varying across studies; the duration of data collection ranged from 28 days to 6 years. Frequently, information on these details was omitted from publications. The number of instruments used by studies to collect patient-reported adverse event data ranged from one to seven instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite growing calls for the inclusion of patient-reported adverse events, this has not yet translated into published reports. The collection and reporting of these data were variable and conducted using instruments that were not designed for purpose. To address these inconsistencies, standardisation of data collection and reporting using a purpose-built validated instrument is required.

Advanced Practice Nursing and CAR-T Cell Therapy: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions

OBJECTIVES

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a new treatment for patients with myeloma and other B cell malignancies where advanced practice nurses (APN) can make a great contribution. The aim of this review is to identify key aspects of current literature relevant to APNs working with this population.

METHODS

Discussion of selected peer-reviewed literature and best practice guidelines found through electronic database searches (CINAHL, MEDLINE).

RESULTS

Although few APN roles in CAR-T cell therapy have been published to date, recent research suggests that the APN is central to the care of these patients. They are essential for continuity of care and navigation through the treatment process, providing an important and consistent point of contact for patients' and carers' anxieties and uncertainties. APNs play a central role in symptom management, as they constantly incorporate new experience and scientific findings into the refinement of existing protocols. The continuum of care extends far beyond the inpatient stay and addresses symptoms that may persist long after cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity have resolved. The APN may therefore make a relevant contribution to patients' health-related quality of life, given its likely correlation with the dynamics and intensity of treatment-related symptoms. The APN also takes on a leadership role in the treatment team.

CONCLUSIONS

APNs use all core competencies to sustainably support and empower patients and caregivers. This is achieved through counseling and education, in addition to identifying, developing, and implementing evidence-based symptom management. They play pivotal roles in introducing new CAR-T cell products, educating teams, and advancing their role through APN networks. Finally, APNs are integral members of multiprofessional teams, supporting colleagues in ethically challenging patient situations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

APNs in the field of CAR-T cell therapy make an important contribution to the continuous care of patients, caregivers, and treatment teams.

Music Listening in Stem Cell Transplantation and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

CONTEXT

Music listening (ML) has been shown to have a beneficial effect on patients with cancer. However, novel intervention approaches are needed.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine whether ML based on the iso-principle, conducted using a mobile application (GloMus), improves symptom burden, quality of life (QoL), anxiety, and depression in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT) and intensive induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

METHODS

In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we assigned 71 patients to the ML or standard care (SC) groups, stratified by the reason for admission (AML, allogeneic-SCT, or inpatient/outpatient autologous-SCT). Upon admission, participants in the ML groups were invited to undergo daily ML sessions designed to change negative moods into positive ones (iso-principle). The intervention consisted of listening to pre-recorded classical music ordered by beats per minute and tonality. Symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised) was assessed in the ML groups before and after each session. Anxiety, depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and QoL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation/Leukemia) were measured weekly in the ML and SC groups.

RESULTS

Symptom burden in both allogeneic- and inpatient autologous-SCT ML groups reduced after the intervention. In all experimental groups, clinically important improvements were observed after ML sessions. No differences were found between the groups (ML vs. SC) at different weeks of admission regarding anxiety, depression, and QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

ML based on our innovative iso-principle strategy, conducted using GloMus, reduced the symptom burden in patients undergoing allogeneic- and inpatient autologous-SCT (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05696457).

Change in Neurocognitive Function in Patients Who Receive CAR-T Cell Therapies: A Steep Hill to Climb

Immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies has brought substantial improvement in clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell neoplasms. However, complications such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) limit the therapeutic efficacy of this treatment approach. ICANS can have a broad range of clinical manifestations, while various scoring systems have been developed for its grading. Cognitive decline is prevalent in CAR-T therapy recipients including impaired attention, difficulty in item naming, and writing, agraphia, and executive dysfunction. In this review, we aim to present the diagnostic methods and tests that have been used for the recognition of cognitive impairment in these patients. Moreover, up-to-date data about the duration of cognitive impairment symptoms after the infusion are presented. More research on the risk factors, pathogenesis, preventive measures, and therapy of neurocognitive impairment is crucial for better outcomes for our patients.

Remission after CAR T-cell therapy: Do lymphoma patients recover a normal life?

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) can induce prolonged remission in a substantial subset of patients with relapse/refractory lymphoma. However, little is known about patients' life after CAR T-cell therapy. We prospectively assessed the multidimensional recovery of lymphoma patients in remission, before leukapheresis, before CAR T-cell infusion, and 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. Validated tools were used to measure lymphoma-related and global health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma [FACT-Lym] and EQ-5D-5L), cognitive complaint (FACT-Cognition), fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue subscale), psychological status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Post-Traumatic Check List Scale), and sexuality (Relationship and Sexuality Scale). Beyond 12 months of remission, we also surveyed physical, professional, sexual, and general life status. At 3, 6, and 12 months, 53, 35, and 23 patients were evaluable, respectively. Improvement in lymphoma-related HRQoL was clinically relevant at 3, 6, and 12 months with a mean change from baseline of 10.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8; 16.1), 12.2 (95% CI: 4.2; 20.1), and 11.72 (95% CI: 2.06; 21.38), respectively. Improvement in global HRQoL, fatigue, and anxiety was clinically relevant, but 20%-40% of patients experienced persistent fatigue, psychological distress, and cognitive complaints over time. Beyond 12 months after CAR T cells, 81.8% of 22 evaluable patients were satisfied with their daily life. Physical activity, professional, sexual, and global well-being had returned to prediagnosis levels in nearly half of the patients. We found an improvement in HRQoL after CAR T-cell therapy including anxiety, depression, sexual satisfaction, and general well-being. However, not all patients recover a "normal life." Further research is needed to determine which patients are at risk of quality-of-life impairment to improve recovery after CAR T-cell infusion.

The new era of immunological treatment, last updated and future consideration of CAR T cell-based drugs

Cancer treatment is one of the fundamental challenges in clinical setting, especially in relapsed/refractory malignancies. The novel immunotherapy-based treatments bring new hope in cancer therapy and achieve various treatment successes. One of the distinguished ways of cancer immunotherapy is adoptive cell therapy, which utilizes genetically modified immune cells against cancer cells. Between different methods in ACT, the chimeric antigen receptor T cells have more investigation and introduced a promising way to treat cancer patients. This technology progressed until it introduced six US Food and Drug Administration-approved CAR T cell-based drugs. These drugs act against hematological malignancies appropriately and achieve exciting results, so they have been utilized widely in cell therapy clinics. In this review, we introduce all CAR T cells-approved drugs based on their last data and investigate them from all aspects of pharmacology, side effects, and compressional. Also, the efficacy of drugs, pre- and post-treatment steps, and expected side effects are introduced, and the challenges and new solutions in CAR T cell therapy are in the last speech.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in the age of CAR T cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the management of relapsed and refractory myeloma, with excellent outcomes and a tolerable safety profile. High dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is established as a mainstream of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) management in patients who are young and fit enough to tolerate such intensity. This standard was developed based on randomized trials comparing AHCT to chemotherapy in the era prior to novel agents. More recently, larger studies have primarily shown a progression free survival (PFS) benefit of upfront AHCT, rather than overall survival (OS) benefit. There is debate about the significance of this lack of OS, acknowledging the potential confounders of the chronic nature of the disease, study design and competing harms and benefits of exposure to AHCT. Indeed upfront AHCT may not be as uniquely beneficial as we once thought, and is not without risk. New quadruple-agent regimens are highly active and effective in achieving a deep response as quantified by measurable residual disease (MRD). The high dose chemotherapy administered with AHCT imposes a burden of short and long-term adverse effects, which may alter the disease course and patient's ability to tolerate future therapies. Some high-risk subgroups may have a more valuable benefit from AHCT, though still ultimately suffer poor outcomes. When compared to the outcomes of CAR T cell therapy, the question of whether AHCT can or indeed should be deferred has become an important topic in the field. Deferring AHCT may be a personalized decision in patients who achieve MRD negativity, which is now well established as a key prognostic factor for PFS and OS. Reserving or re-administering AHCT at relapse is feasible in many cases and holds the promise of resetting the T cell compartment and opening up options for immune reengagement. It is likely that personalized MRD-guided decision making will shape how we sequence in the future, though more studies are required to delineate when this is safe and appropriate.

High Symptom Burden Predicts Poorer Quality of Life Among Children and Adolescents Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation or Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

BACKGROUND

Children with cancer and other serious illnesses experience symptom burden during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, yet limited research has characterized how these symptoms interact with overall quality of life over time.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the longitudinal relationship between symptoms and quality of life in children receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

METHODS

A multisite study design was used to collect symptom and quality of life information at pre-cell infusion and days +30, +60, and +90 from children (N = 140) receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. A longitudinal parallel process model was used to characterize the relationship between symptoms and quality of life.

RESULTS

Children (mean age, 8.4 years) received allogeneic transplant (57.9%), autologous transplant (25.7%), or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (16.4%). Symptom prevalence was highest at baseline (>50%) for pain, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and low appetite. Quality of life scores were worse at baseline (mean [SD], 69.5 [15.8]) and improved by 10 points by day +90. The longitudinal model indicated high symptom prevalence at baseline predicted worse quality of life at both baseline and day +90.

CONCLUSIONS

Children felt worse early in the treatment trajectory and improved by day +90. The level of symptom burden predicted the overall quality of life at all time points.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Children experiencing high symptom burden should receive frequent assessment and enhanced symptom management throughout the treatment trajectory to mitigate negative impacts on quality of life.

The Patient Symptom Experience After Tisagenlecleucel and Lisocabtagene Maraleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy for Lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment is associated with several unique toxicities, and the short-term symptom trajectory in the immediately after therapy is well-documented. However, little is known about patients' long-term symptom experience. The study aimed to elicit the symptom experience of adult patients in remission after CAR T-cell therapy for B cell lymphoma.

DATA SOURCES

A qualitative descriptive design with thematic analysis was utilized. Recruitment occurred at a tertiary academic medical center using the following inclusion criteria: adult recipient of CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell lymphoma between 3 and 12 months prior to enrollment, and currently in remission. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcripts were inductively coded, and team members met weekly to ensure rigor. The final sample included 10 patients: Seven received tisagenlecleucel and three received lisocabtagene marleucel and were a median of 169 days post-infusion and 65 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants continued to report symptoms, including fatigue, neuropathy, low endurance, insomnia, memory problems, and pain. Most symptoms improved over time. Some symptoms interfered with social activities, work, driving, and physical activity, though participants reported that most symptoms existed prior to CAR T-cell therapy, and overall, found CAR T-cell therapy acceptable.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Patients in remission after CAR T-cell therapy often continue to experience symptoms. Nurses should continue to assess this growing patient population and determine if patients require additional symptom management or support. Further research is needed to understand long-term symptom trajectory and associations with prior lines of therapy and CAR T-cell therapy.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel for second-line relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: patient-reported outcomes from the PILOT study

In the single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II PILOT study, second-line treatment with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) for whom hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was not intended resulted in high response rates, durable responses, and a safety profile consistent with previous reports. Here, we analyzed changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients who received liso-cel in PILOT. Patients received liso-cel, an autologous, CD19-directed, 4-1BB CAR T-cell product administered at equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR+ T cells, for a total target dose of 100×10⁶ CAR+ T cells. HRQOL, a secondary endpoint of PILOT, was assessed as prespecified using three patient-reported outcome instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30; FACT-LymS; EQ-5D-5L). Evaluable datasets for the EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-LymS, and EQ-5D-5L health utility index, and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) included 56 (92%), 49 (80%), 55 (90%), and 54 (89%) patients, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvement was achieved across most post-treatment visits for EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue and FACT-LymS. Overall mean changes from baseline through day 545 showed significant improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue, pain, and appetite loss, FACT-LymS, and EQ VAS. In within-patient analyses, clinically meaningful improvements or maintenance in scores were observed in most patients at days 90, 180, 270, and 365. HRQOL was maintained or improved in patients who received liso-cel as second-line therapy in PILOT. These findings support liso-cel as a preferred second-line treatment in patients with R/R LBCL not intended for HSCT (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03483103).

INSPIRED Symposium Part 4A: Access to CAR T Cell Therapy in Unique Populations with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The approval of tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) for use in children with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) was based on the phase 2 ELIANA trial, a global registration study. However, the ELIANA trial excluded specific subsets of patients facing unique challenges and did not include a sufficient number of patients to adequately evaluate outcomes in rare subpopulations. Since the commercialization of tisa-cel, data have become available that support therapeutic indications beyond the specific cohorts previously eligible for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeted to CD19 (CD19 CAR-T) therapy on the registration clinical trial. Substantial real-world data and aggregate clinical trial data have addressed gaps in our understanding of response rates, longer-term efficacy, and toxicities associated with CD19 CAR-T in special populations and rare clinical scenarios. These include patients with central nervous system relapsed disease, who were excluded from ELIANA and other early CAR-T trials owing to concerns about risk of neurotoxicity that have not been born out. There is also interest in the use of CD19 CAR-T for very-high-risk patients earlier in the course of therapy, such as patients with persistent minimal residual disease after 2 cycles of upfront chemotherapy and patients with first relapse of B-ALL. However, these indications are not specified on the label for tisa-cel and historically were not included in eligibility criteria for most clinical trials; data addressing these populations are needed. Populations at high risk of relapse, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic lesions, infants with B-ALL, patients with trisomy 21, and young adults with B-ALL, also may benefit from earlier treatment with CD19 CAR-T. It is important to prospectively study patient-reported outcomes given the differential toxicity expected between CD19 CAR-T and the historic standard of care, hematopoietic cell transplantation. Now that CD19 CAR-T therapy is commercially available, studies evaluating potential access disparities created by this very expensive novel therapy are increasingly pressing.

Long-term survivorship care after CAR-T cell therapy

While cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome are well-recognized acute toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, these complications have become increasingly manageable by protocolized treatment algorithms incorporating the early administration of tocilizumab and corticosteroids. As CAR-T cell therapy expands to new disease indications and the number of long-term survivors steadily increases, there is growing recognition of the need to appropriately evaluate and manage the late effects of CAR-T cell therapy, including late-onset or persistent neurotoxicity, prolonged cytopenias, delayed immune reconstitution and infections, subsequent malignancies, organ dysfunction, psychological distress, and fertility implications. In this review, we provide a practical approach to the long-term survivorship care of the CAR-T cell recipient, with a focus on the optimal strategies to address the common and challenging late complications affecting this unique population.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Myeloma: Where Are We Now and What Is Needed to Move Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Forward to Earlier Lines of Therapy? Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Since 2021, 2 B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies-idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel)-have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after 4 or more prior lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory drug, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody. The 2 products have shown unprecedented activity in RRMM, but relapses remain common, and access to and safety of CAR-T therapy in patients with rapidly progressing advanced disease are not ideal. Sequencing CAR-T therapy with other options, including the 2 recently approved BCMA-directed T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies teclistamab and elranatamab, has become increasingly challenging owing to data showing inferior outcomes from CAR-T therapy after prior BCMA-directed therapy. This has led to the consideration of CAR-T therapy earlier in the course of disease for myeloma, when T cells are potentially healthier and the myeloma is less aggressive. To address the question of earlier use of CAR-T therapy, several trials are either ongoing or planned, and results have recently been reported for 2 randomized trials of CAR-T therapy showing improved progression-free survival compared to standard of care therapy in second-line (CARTITUDE-4) or third-line therapy (KarMMA-3). With the anticipation of the FDA possibly expanding approval of CAR-T to earlier lines of myeloma therapy, the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy convened a group of experts to provide a comprehensive review of the studies that led to the approval of CAR-T therapy in late-line therapy for myeloma, discuss the recently reported and ongoing studies designed to move CAR-T therapy to earlier lines of therapy, and share insights and considerations for sequencing therapy and optimization of patient selection for BCMA-directed therapies in current practice.

Early and Late Toxicities of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells

As chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is increasingly integrated into clinical practice across a range of malignancies, identifying and treating inflammatory toxicities will be vital to success. Early experiences with CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy identified cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity as key acute toxicities and led to unified initiatives to mitigate the influence of these complications. In this section, we provide an update on the current state of CAR T-cell-related toxicities, with an emphasis on emerging acute toxicities affecting additional organ systems and considerations for delayed toxicities and late effects.

Cognition following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed to characterise the cognitive outcomes of patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Medline, and CINAHL (February 2023). Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Checklist for Case Reports and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomised Studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 1104 participants. There was considerable methodological heterogeneity with differing study designs (e.g., cohort studies, clinical trials, case studies, a qualitative interview, and a focus group), measures of cognition (e.g., self-report, neuropsychological measures, clinician assessed/neurological examinations), and longest follow-up time points (i.e., five days to five years).

DISCUSSION

Results of the studies were heterogenous with studies demonstrating stable, improved, or reduced cognition across differing time points. Overall, cognitive symptoms are common particularly in the acute stage (<2 weeks) post-infusion. Most deficits that arise in the acute stage resolve within one to two weeks, however, there is a subset of patients who continue to experience and self-report persistent deficits in the subacute and chronic stages. Future studies are needed to comprehensively analyse cognition using a combination of self-report and psychometric measures following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the acute, subacute, and chronic settings.

Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has transformed the treatment for relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies; however, data on patient-reported outcomes in CAR-T are limited. We conducted a longitudinal study of adults with hematologic malignancies receiving CAR-T. We assessed quality of life (QOL; functional assessment of cancer therapy-general), psychological distress (hospital anxiety and depression scale, patient health questionnaire-9, posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] checklist), and physical symptoms (Edmonton symptom assessment scale-revised) at baseline, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after CAR-T. We used linear mixed models to identify factors associated with QOL trajectory. We enrolled 103 of 142 eligible patients (3 did not receive CAR-T). QOL (B = 1.96; P < .001) and depression (B = -0.32; P = .001) worsened by 1 week and improved by 6 months after CAR-T. At 6 months, 18%, 22%, and 22% reported clinically significant depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms, respectively. At 1 week, 52% reported severe physical symptoms, declining to 28% at 6 months after CAR-T. In unadjusted linear mixed models, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (B = 1.24; P = .042), receipt of tocilizumab (B = 1.54; P = .042), and receipt of corticosteroids for cytokine release syndrome and/or neurotoxicity (B = 2.05; P = .006) were associated with higher QOL trajectory. After CAR-T, QOL declined, and depression increased early, followed by improvements in QOL, psychological distress, and physical symptoms by 6 months after infusion. A significant minority of patients reported substantial psychological distress and physical symptoms longitudinally.

CAR-T Cells in Canada; Perspective on How to Ensure We Get Our Value’s Worth

New therapies in a publicly funded healthcare system are first appraised by health technology assessment agencies that provide funding recommendations to the payers. Treatment with Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy is revolutionizing the management of patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma by providing an effective alternative to the standard of care. Yet, the implementation of CAR-T treatment has a substantial impact on the healthcare system due to its high cost, complex manufacturing process, and requirement for highly specialized services and expertise. CAR-T Cells, as a “living drug”, are fundamentally different from usual medications, and their approvals and funding recommendations pose unique challenges to the health technology agency. In this paper, we explore the specific challenges that face the health technology agencies in reviewing reimbursement recommendations for CAR-T therapy. We take a Canadian perspective and use CAR-T treatment of relapse/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma as an example.

Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas in the CART era

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) has rapidly been adopted as the standard third-line therapy to treat aggressive B-cell lymphomas (ABCL) after failure of second-line therapy despite the lack of direct comparisons with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT)-based strategies. Using the Grupo Español de Trasplante y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) registry, we selected patients with the following characteristics: CART or alloHCT performed between 2016 and 2021; ≥18 years old; ABCL diagnosis; ≥2 lines of therapy; and either anti-CD19 CART or alloHCT as therapy at relapse. The analysis included a total of 316 (CART = 215, alloHCT = 101) patients. Median follow-up was 15 and 36 months for the CART and alloHCT cohorts, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, CART was confirmed to be similar to alloHCT for the primary study endpoint (progression-free survival) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, CI95%:0.56-1.51, p = 0.75). Furthermore, when the analysis was limited to only patients with chemo-sensitive diseases (complete and partial response) at infusion (CART = 26, alloHCT=93), no differences were reported (progression-free survival at month +18: 65% versus 55%, p = 0.59). However, CART had lower non-relapse mortality (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.85, p = 0.02). Given the lower toxicity and similar survival outcomes, these results suggest the use of CART before alloHCT.

Patient-reported outcomes in adoptive cell-therapy trials: mind the gap

Adoptive cell therapies (ACT) have demonstrated promise in the treatment of patients with cancer, leading to long-lasting responses and, in some cases, even cure. Technological advances have brought these individualized therapies closer to reality, establishing them as credible therapeutic option. However, to date, few efforts have been made to understand patients' experience during ACT trials. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which are instruments used to report PROs, are increasingly being used in oncology to capture patients' perspective, provide real-world data on treatment safety, and support decision-making processes, such as health economic decisions. Due to the inherent complexity of ACT, the inclusion of PROMs in this field remains limited. In this commentary, we discuss the benefit of capturing PROs in ACT trials, the challenges of PROM administration and collection, and we propose simple and actionable recommendations to promote their adoption in ACT trials.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies and Patient-reported Outcomes: A Scoping Review

The inclusion of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy research is critical for understanding the impact of this novel approach from a unique patient standpoint. We performed a scoping review to map the available literature on the use of PRO measures in CAR T-cell therapy studies of patients with hematologic malignancies published between January 2015 and July 2022. Fourteen studies were identified, of which 7 (50%) were investigational early-phase trials, 6 (42.9%) were observational studies, and 1 (7.1%) was a pilot study. The EQ-5D and the PROMIS-29 were the 2 most frequently used PRO measures, being included in 6 (42.9%) and 5 (35.7%) studies, respectively. Despite differences in study designs, there seems to be evidence of improvements over time since CAR T-cell infusion in important domains such as physical functioning and fatigue, at least in patients who respond to therapy. Overall, the studies identified in our review have shown the added value of PRO assessment in CAR T-cell therapy research by providing novel information that complements the knowledge on safety and efficacy. However, there are several questions which remain to be answered in future research. For example, limited evidence exists regarding patient experience during important phases of the disease trajectory as only 4 (28.6%) and 5 (35.7%) studies provided information on PROs during the first 2 weeks from CAR T-cell infusion and after the first year, respectively. Time is ripe for a more systematic implementation of high-quality PRO assessment in future clinical trials and in real-life settings of patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy.