Gene transfer of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor improves the function of lung allografts

Creating superior lungs for transplantation with next-generation gene therapy during ex vivo lung perfusion

Engineering donor organs to better tolerate the harmful non-immunological and immunological responses inherently related to solid organ transplantation would improve transplant outcomes. Our enhanced knowledge of ischemia-reperfusion injury, alloimmune responses and pathological fibroproliferation after organ transplantation, and the advanced toolkit available for gene therapies, have brought this goal closer to clinical reality. Ex vivo organ perfusion has evolved rapidly especially in the field of lung transplantation, where clinicians routinely use ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to confirm the quality of marginal donor lungs before transplantation, enabling safe transplantation of organs originally considered unusable. EVLP would also be an attractive platform to deliver gene therapies, as treatments could be administered to an isolated organ before transplantation, thereby providing a window for sophisticated organ engineering while minimizing off-target effects to the recipient. Here, we review the status of lung transplant first-generation gene therapies that focus on inducing transgene expression in the target cells. We also highlight recent advances in next-generation gene therapies, that enable gene editing and epigenetic engineering, that could be used to permanently change the donor organ genome and to induce widespread transcriptional gene expression modulation in the donor lung. In a future vision, dedicated organ repair and engineering centers will use gene editing and epigenetic engineering, to not only increase the donor organ pool, but to create superior organs that will function better and longer in the recipient.

Gene Therapy: Will the Promise of Optimizing Lung Allografts Become Reality?

Lung transplantation is the definitive therapy for patients living with end-stage lung disease. Despite significant progress made in the field, graft survival remains the lowest of all solid organ transplants. Additionally, the lung has among the lowest of organ utilization rates-among eligible donors, only 22% of lungs from multi-organ donors were transplanted in 2019. Novel strategies are needed to rehabilitate marginal organs and improve graft survival. Gene therapy is one promising strategy in optimizing donor allografts. Over-expression or inhibition of specific genes can be achieved to target various pathways of graft injury, including ischemic-reperfusion injuries, humoral or cellular rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Experiments in animal models have historically utilized adenovirus-based vectors and the majority of literature in lung transplantation has focused on overexpression of IL-10. Although several strategies were shown to prevent rejection and prolong graft survival in preclinical models, none have led to clinical translation. The past decade has seen a renaissance in the field of gene therapy and two AAV-based in vivo gene therapies are now FDA-approved for clinical use. Concurrently, normothermic ex vivo machine perfusion technology has emerged as an alternative to traditional static cold storage. This preservation method keeps organs physiologically active during storage and thus potentially offers a platform for gene therapy. This review will explore the advantages and disadvantages of various gene therapy modalities, review various candidate genes implicated in various stages of allograft injury and summarize the recent efforts in optimizing donor lungs using gene therapy.

Bronchoalveolar lavage cytokine-based risk stratification of minimal acute rejection in clinically stable lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains the most significant risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). While clinically significant or higher-grade (≥A2) ACR is generally treated with augmented immunosuppression (IS), the management of clinically stable grade A1 ACR remains controversial. At our center, patients with clinically stable grade A1 ACR are routinely not treated with augmented IS. While the overall outcomes in this group of patients at our center are equivalent to patients with stable A0 pathology, CLAD and death rates remain overall high. We hypothesized that a distinct cytokine signature at the time of early minimal rejection state would be associated with worse outcomes. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) biomarkers at the time of first clinically stable grade A1 ACR (CSA1R) are predictive of subsequent CLAD or death.

METHODS

Among all adult, bilateral, first lung transplants, performed 2010-2016, transbronchial biopsies obtained within the first-year post-transplant were categorized as clinically stable or unstable based on the presence or absence of ≥10% concurrent drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁). We assessed BAL samples obtained at the time of CSA1R episodes, which were not preceded by another ACR (i.e., first episodes). Twenty-one proteins previously associated with ACR or CLAD were measured in the BAL using a multiplex bead assay. Association between protein levels and subsequent CLAD or death was assessed using Cox Proportional Hazards models, adjusted for relevant peri-transplant clinical covariates.

RESULTS

We identified 75 patients with first CSA1R occurring at a median time of 98 days (range 48.5-197) post-transplant. Median time from transplant to CLAD or death was 1247 (756.5-1921.5) and 1641 days (1024.5-2326.5), respectively. In multivariable models, levels of MCP1/CCL2, S100A8, IL10, TNF-receptor 1, and pentraxin 3 (PTX3) were associated with both CLAD development and death (p < 0.05 for all). PTX3 remained significantly associated with both CLAD and death after adjusting for multiple comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that a focused BAL protein signature, with PTX3 having the strongest association, may be useful in determining a subset of CSA1R patients at increased risk and may benefit from a more aggressive management strategy.

Biologics in the treatment of transplant rejection and ischemia/reperfusion injury: new applications for TNFalpha inhibitors?

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors have proven efficacy in various autoimmune diseases such as Crohn disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Indeed, some TNFalpha inhibitors have already been approved for the management of the inflammatory manifestations associated with Crohn disease and rheumatoid arthritis. These agents are increasingly used for treatment of corticosteroid-resistant graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation, and case reports have documented their efficacy in treating corticosteroid- and muromonab-resistant rejection after intestinal transplantation. Thus, the potential role of TNFalpha inhibitors in transplantation of other vascularized solid organs is worthy of investigation. Experimental evidence indicates that TNFalpha plays a key role in mediating ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury after liver, kidney, intestine, heart, lung, and pancreas transplantation. TNFalpha was also identified as a marker cytokine during organ rejection. Single-center studies evaluating the role of TNFalpha inhibitors in kidney transplantation have been initiated but the results are not yet available. TNFalpha is known to be a contributing factor in kidney allograft rejection, and may have value in predicting the onset of steroid-resistant acute rejection after liver transplantation. Experimental and preliminary clinical data have shown that circulating levels of TNFalpha are increased during cardiac graft rejection, and indicate that TNFalpha plays a role in the pathogenesis of acute cardiac allograft rejection. Anti-TNFalpha therapy was shown to prolong cardiac allograft survival when used alone or in combination with other drugs. TNFalpha genotype has been strongly associated with mortality in humans due to acute cell-mediated heart transplant rejection. In addition, there is evidence for a genetic predisposition toward acute rejection after kidney and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. TNFalpha inhibition has been used successfully as part of an induction therapy for pancreatic islet cell transplantation. Apart from IR injury and acute rejection after lung transplantation, TNFalpha was also found to be involved in the pathoimmunology of obliterative bronchiolitis. In conclusion, a substantial body of experimental evidence and preliminary clinical data suggest that TNFalpha inhibitors may play an important role in solid-organ transplantation, both in the amelioration of IR injury and in the treatment and prevention of acute rejection. Pharmacodynamic monitoring and pharmacogenetic screening may help to identify patients most likely to benefit from TNFalpha blockade. Randomized controlled trials in patients undergoing solid-organ transplantation are needed to further elucidate the clinical value of TNFalpha inhibition.