A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry

Development of a Simple Analytical Model to Facilitate Preoperative Surgical Planning in Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement

PURPOSE

Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) is attractive for aortic root dilation as it preserves the native aortic valve (AoV). Low effective height (eH) after reconstruction is a risk factor for repair failure and reoperation. We developed and validated a quantitative AoV repair strategy to reliably restore normal valve proportions to promote long-term function.

METHODS

Normal AoV proportions were used to derive geometric relationships for sinotubular junction diameter (DSTJ), free edge length (FEL), free edge angle, and commissure height. These relationships informed two models for predicting eH following VSRR: (1) assuming valve symmetry and (2) accounting for valve asymmetry. Porcine heart (n = 6) ex vivo validation was performed under 4 VSRR scenarios: "Ideal" (tube graft size targeting FEL/DSTJ = 1.28), "Oversized" (one graft size larger than Ideal), "Undersized" (two sizes smaller), and "Undersized + Plicated" (FEL/DSTJ = 1.28 restored with leaflet plication).

RESULTS

Our analytical models predicted eH using preoperative measurements and estimated reconstructed dimensions. The Oversized graft exhibited similar eH to Ideal but higher regurgitation in the ex vivo model, whereas the Undersized graft demonstrated lower eH and regurgitation. Plication in the Undersized graft restored valve function (regurgitation & eH) similar to Ideal in the ex vivo model and above Ideal in the analytical models. Both analytical models predicted ex vivo eH well except in the Oversized and Undersized + Plicated conditions.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing measurements from preoperative imaging and simple mathematical models, patient-specific operative plans for VSRR can be created by estimating valve dimensions necessary to achieve favorable valve features post-repair. Clinical application of this approach promises to improve consistency in achieving optimal long-term dimensions and durability.

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement-for all patients?

BACKGROUND

Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) has been associated with good survival and low rates of valve-related complications (VRCs). Whether these advantages are present irrespective of patient comorbidity or age is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze survival and frequency of VRCs in relation to patient comorbidity and age.

METHODS

Between October 1995 and December 2021, 1156 patients with a bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve were treated by root remodeling. The mean patient age was 53.3 ± 14 years, and 973 (84%) were male. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.7 ± 5.5 years (median, 5.9 years), and follow-up was 95% complete (7746 patient-years). We analyzed the population according to comorbidity and age at surgery. A discriminating cutoff for the effect of age was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Mean survival at 15 years was 74.7 ± 2.5%. Deceased patients were older (mean, 65.3 ± 12 years vs 51.6 ± 14.1 years; P < .001) at the time of surgery and had more comorbidities (coronary artery disease [CAD], 28.4% vs 9.8%; P < .001). The sole significant adjusted predictor was age (P < .001). By ROC analysis (area under the curve, 0.780), the optimal cutoff for age was 61 years. Survival was 87.1 ± 2.8% at 15 years in patients age <61 years, compared to 55.3 ± 4.3% in patients age >61 years (P < .0001). Using competing risk analysis, VRC-free survival at 15 years was 66.8% at 15 years, including 76.7% in patients age <61 years and 52.4% in those age >61 years (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

VSRR is associated with a low incidence of VRC and excellent durability. Survival is decreased in the presence of comorbidities, mainly CAD, and patient age >61 years. Despite lower survival, freedom from VRC is good.

Aortic Root Remodeling in the Tricuspid Aortic Valve

BACKGROUND

Aortic root remodeling is one of the principal forms of valve-preserving root replacement. Its value has been questioned by some, whereas others have achieved excellent valve durability. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing information to determine which factors may have contributed both to failures and to successes.

METHODS

Publications on root remodeling for aneurysm or dissection with tricuspid aortic valves with >15 patients were reviewed for specific details of preoperative and intraoperative management.

RESULTS

The series were very heterogeneous. Most operations were performed for root aneurysm, and 10 publications included type A dissection. Connective tissue disease was present in 22% of patients. Mean patient age was 52 years, and 5-year survival varied between 58% and 100%. Most series did not include an annuloplasty. Importantly, no details on quantitative assessment of valve configuration were specified in most series, especially those with suboptimal valve function and durability. The introduction of the effective height concept to control valve configuration was associated with improved results and more frequent correction of cusp prolapse. Late freedom from aortic regurgitation and freedom from reoperation are good in the larger series.

CONCLUSIONS

Root remodeling can lead to excellent valve durability if quantitative intraoperative measurement of valve configuration is performed. The addition of an annuloplasty seems to improve aortic valve competence further, even though its effect on durability is not unequivocally proven. The long-term results of root remodeling are good, also in the second postoperative decade, and it is a valid form of valve-preserving root replacement.

Prolapse repair for aortic regurgitation in tricuspid aortic valves

OBJECTIVE

Cusp prolapse is an important cause of aortic regurgitation (AR) in tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs) and can be caused by myxomatous degeneration or cusp fenestration. Long-term data for prolapse repair in TAVs are scarce. We analyzed the results of aortic valve repair in patients with TAV morphology and AR caused by prolapse and compared the results for cusp fenestration and myxomatous degeneration.

METHODS

Between October 2000 and December 2020, 237 patients (221 male; 15-83 years) underwent TAV repair for cusp prolapse. Prolapse was associated with fenestrations in 94 (group I) and myxomatous degeneration in 143 patients (group II). Fenestrations were closed using a pericardial patch (n = 75) or suture (n = 19). In myxomatous degeneration, prolapse was corrected by free margin plication (n = 132) or triangular resection (n = 11). Follow-up was 97% complete (cumulatively 1531, mean 6.5, median 5.8 years). Cardiac comorbidities were present in 111 patients (46.8%), and more frequent in group II (P = .003).

RESULTS

Ten-year survival was better in group I (I: 84.5%; II: 72.4%; P = .037), and patients without cardiac comorbidities (89.2% vs 67.0%; P = .002). Ten-year freedom from reoperation (P = .778), moderate or greater AR (P = .070), and valve-related complications (P = .977) were similar in both groups. AR at discharge was the only significant predictor for reoperation (P = .042). The type of annuloplasty did not affect repair durability.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of cusp prolapse in TAVs with preserved root dimensions can be performed with acceptable durability, even in the presence of fenestrations.

Long-term durability of valve-sparing root replacement in patients with and without connective tissue disease

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) and compare them with patients without CTD who underwent valve-sparing root replacement for root aneurysm.

METHODS

Of 487 patients, 380 (78%) did not have CTD and 107 (22%) had CTD; 97 (91%) with Marfan syndrome, 8 (7%) with Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 2 (2%) with Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Operative and long-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The CTD group was younger (36 ± 14 years vs 53 ± 12 years; P < .001), had more women (41% vs 10%; P < .001) and had less hypertension (28% vs 78%; P < .001) and bicuspid aortic valve (8% vs 28%; P < .001). Other baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. Overall operative mortality was nil (P = 1.000); the incidence of major postoperative complications was 1.2% (0.9% vs 1.3%; P = 1.000) and did not differ between groups. Residual mild aortic insufficiency (AI) was more frequent in the CTD group (9.3% vs 1.3%, P < .001) with no difference in moderate or greater AI. Ten-year survival was 97.3% (97.2% vs 97.4%; log-rank P = .801). Of the 15 patients with residual AI, 1 had none, 11 remained mild, 2 had moderate, and 1 had severe AI on follow-up. Ten-year freedom from moderate/severe AI was 89.6% (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.8-1.37; P = .750) and 10-year freedom from valve reoperation was 94.9% (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.43-3.39; P = .717).

CONCLUSIONS

The operative outcomes as well as long-term durability of valve-sparing root replacement is excellent in patients with or without CTD. Valve function and durability are not influenced by CTD.

Aortic valve performance after remodelling versus reimplantation in a propensity-matched comparison

OBJECTIVES

Both aortic root remodelling and aortic valve (AV) reimplantation have been used for valve-sparing root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm with or without aortic regurgitation. There is no clear evidence to support one technique over the another. This study aimed to compare remodelling with basal ring annuloplasty versus reimplantation on a multicentre level with the use of propensity-score matching.

METHODS

This was a retrospective international multicentre study of patients undergoing remodelling or reimplantation between 2010 and 2021. Twenty-three preoperative covariates (including root dimensions and valve characteristics) were used for propensity-score matching. Perioperative outcomes were analysed along with longer-term freedom from AV reoperation/reintervention and other major valve-related events.

RESULTS

Throughout the study period, 297 patients underwent remodelling and 281 had reimplantation. Using propensity-score matching, 112 pairs were selected and further compared. We did not find a statistically significant difference in perioperative outcomes between the matched groups. Patients after remodelling had significantly higher reintervention risk than after reimplantation over the median follow-up of 6 years (P = 0.016). The remodelling technique (P = 0.02), need for decalcification (P = 0.03) and degree of immediate postoperative AV regurgitation (P < 0.001) were defined as independent risk factors for later AV reintervention. After exclusion of patients with worse than mild AV regurgitation immediately after repair, both techniques functioned comparably (P = 0.089).

CONCLUSIONS

AV reimplantation was associated with better valve function in longer-term postoperatively than remodelling. If optimal immediate repair outcome was achieved, both techniques provided comparable AV function.

Aortic valve cusp size and shape in dilated trileaflet aortic roots

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to quantify the differences in cusp size and shape in patients with normal and dilated trileaflet aortic roots and in dilated roots with or without aortic regurgitation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of computed tomography studies in patients with normal and dilated trileaflet aortic roots was performed measuring root and cusp dimensions. Normal root size was defined as sinuses of Valsalva diameter less than 40 mm, dilated as 45 mm or greater. Root measurements normalized to basal ring diameter and cusp measurements normalized to geometric height were analyzed to assess the shape. Additionally, comparison of dilated roots with or without aortic regurgitation was made.

RESULTS

We analyzed 146 normal and 104 dilated aortic roots and 73 propensity-matched pairs. Dilated roots were larger in all dimensions and had increased ratio between commissural and basal ring diameter (1.58 ± 0.23 vs 1.11 ± 0.10, P < .001). Cusps in dilated roots were larger in all measured dimensions and were elongated with increased normalized cusp insertion length (3.64 ± 0.39 vs 3.26 ± 0.20, P < .001) and normalized free margin length (2.53 ± 0.30 vs 2.16 ± 0.19, P < .001). In patients with dilated root and no cusp prolapse (n = 83), those with moderate or severe aortic regurgitation had larger commissural diameter but similar cusp dimensions compared with those with no or mild aortic regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The cusps in dilated roots elongate transversely and to a lesser degree radially. Functional aortic regurgitation is caused by extensive commissural dilatation and not by inadequate cusp adaptation.

Comprehensive imaging evaluation of the aortic valve and root before aortic root surgery: a study comparing MDCT and TEE

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy and consistency of MDCT and TEE in the preoperative assessment of aortic root surgery.

METHODS

From January 2021 to September 2022, 118 patients who underwent aortic root surgery were included in this study. All patients underwent high-quality preoperative MDCT and TEE examinations, and the examination results were independently measured and assessed by two senior radiologists or ultrasound specialists. Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson correlation testing were employed to assess the correlation and consistency between MDCT and TEE. These analyses were then compared with actual intraoperative measurement data.

RESULTS

Among all the patients, 73 (61.86%) had tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), and 45 (38.14%) had bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). A comparison between the TEE and MDCT measurements showed that for the annulus diameter, the area-derived diameter had the best correlation and agreement. For the sinus of Valsalva diameter, the circumference-derived diameter was optimal. However, for the STJ diameter, the minimum cross-sectional diameter showed the best agreement with TEE. In contrast, measurements of geometric height showed a weaker correlation and agreement.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced MDCT can be a valuable tool for perioperative evaluation in aortic root surgery, with good correlation, consistency, and feasibility when compared to TEE. The choice of MDCT measurement methodology, specifically area-derived and circumference-derived diameter, proved to be more accurate than other methods. Further research is required to enhance the understanding of aortic valve repair and associated imaging techniques.

Safety and efficacy of aortic valvuloplasty for de novo aortic insufficiency in patients with a left-ventricular assist device

OBJECTIVES

Progression of aortic insufficiency during left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is a crucial topic. One treatment option is aortic valvuloplasty (AVP); however, there is controversy regarding its safety and efficacy. We investigated the safety and efficacy of AVP using the coaptation stitch method (Park's stitch) performed for de novo aortic insufficiency.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2020, 175 consecutive patients underwent LVAD implantation, of which 7 patients [men, 2 (28.6%); median age, 55 years] underwent late-stage AVP. Two patients underwent AVP within 2 weeks, and the remaining six patients underwent AVP 3, 19, 24, 28, 42, and 49 months, respectively, after LVAD implantation.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the degree of aortic insufficiency was moderate in 6 (85.7%) patients and severe in 1 (14.3%) patient. AVP was technically successful in 6 (85.7%) patients, while one case of failed plasty was subsequently treated with bioprosthetic valve replacement. A 1-year post-AVP right heart catheterization study revealed a median pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 10.0 mmHg. No deaths or heart failure admissions occurred during the follow-up (median, 38.0 months). There was no aortic insufficiency in 2 (28.6%) patients; however, trivial AI was observed in 3 (42.8%) patients, and mild AI was observed in 1 (14.3%) patient 2 years postoperatively. However, at the 3-year follow-up, two patients developed an increase in AI grade from trivial to mild.

CONCLUSIONS

AVP using Park's stitch was safe. It is critical to carefully observe the aortic valve during AVP surgery to ensure that AVP is appropriate.

Midterm Results of an Algorithmic 3-Pronged Approach to Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated midterm outcomes of a 3-pronged algorithm for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair. Valve-sparing root reimplantation (VSRR) was performed for patients with aortic root dilatation. In those without a root aneurysm, external subannular ring (ESAR) was performed for annuli ≥28 mm and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA) for annuli <28 mm.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 242 patients undergoing primary BAV repair from April 29, 2004, to March 1, 2023, at a single institution. Primary end points were mortality, structural valve degeneration (SVD), which was defined as a composite of more than moderate aortic insufficiency or severe aortic stenosis, and reintervention.

RESULTS

The algorithm was used to treat 201 patients; of these, 130 underwent VSRR, 35 had ESAR, and 36 underwent SCA. Most were men with mean age of 43.8 years (SD, 12.0 years), which was similar between groups. Preoperative aortic insufficiency more than moderate was more common for ESAR compared with VSRR and SCA (74.3% vs 37.7% vs 44.4%, P < .001). At 30 days, mortality was 0.8% (n = 1) for VSRR and 0% for ESAR and SCA. At 6 years, overall Kaplan-Meier survival was 98.9% (95% CI, 97.3%-100%), with no differences between groups (P = .5). The cumulative incidence of SVD was 4.7% (95% CI, 0.1%-9.2%) for VSRR, 6.4% (95% CI, 0%-14.6%) for ESAR, and 0% for SCA (P = .4). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of reintervention with all-cause mortality as a competing risk was 2.2% (95% CI, 0.4%-6.9%), 6.1% (95% CI, 1%-17.9%), and 0% for VSRR, ESAR, and SCA, respectively (P = .506).

CONCLUSIONS

A 3-pronged algorithmic approach to BAV repair results in excellent survival and freedom from reoperation at 6 years.

Twenty-five years' experience with isolated bicuspid aortic valve repair: impact of commissural orientation

OBJECTIVES

Repair of the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) has evolved in the past 25 years. The aim of this study was to review and analyse the long-term durability of isolated BAV repair with particular focus on commissural orientation (CO).

METHODS

All patients who underwent BAV repair for severe aortic regurgitation between October 1998 and December 2022 were included. The study group consists of all patients operated after 2009, i.e. since CO modification. The control group includes patients who were operated before 2009. CO was classified as symmetric, asymmetric and very asymmetric.

RESULTS

Overall, 594 adult patients (93% male; mean age 42 years) were included. At 15 years, survival was 94.8% [standard deviation (SD): 2.2]; freedom from reoperation was 86.8% (SD: 2.3). Freedom from aortic insufficiency ≥II was 70.8% (SD: 4.7) at 15 years. Modification of CO by sinus plication was performed in 200 (33.7%) instances. Using competing risks analysis, the absence of effective height measurement (P = 0.018), very asymmetric CO (P = 0.028), the presence of calcification (P < 0.001), the use of pericardial patch (P < 0.001), the use of subcommissural sutures (P < 0.001) and preoperative endocarditis (P = 0.005) were identified as independent predictors for reoperation. Follow-up was 97% complete (4228 patient-years); mean follow-up was 7 years (SD: 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated BAV repair leads to good survival and durability in all morphologic types if cusp repair is guided by effective height, suture annuloplasty is performed, and CO is modified using sinus plication in asymmetrical valves. Very asymmetrical valves may should be treated with a lower threshold for replacement.

Systematic adjustment of root dimensions to cusp size in aortic valve repair: a computer simulation

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve repair requires the creation of a normal geometry of cusps and aortic root. Of the different dimensions, geometric cusp height is the most difficult to change while annular and sinotubular dimensions can be easily modified. The objective of this study was to investigate, by computer simulation, ideal combinations of annular and sinotubular junction size for a given geometric height.

METHODS

Based on a literature review of anatomical data, a computational biomechanics model was generated for a tricuspid aortic valve. We aimed to determine the ideal relationships for the root dimensions, keeping geometric height constant and creating different combinations of the annular and sinotubular junction dimensions. Using this model, 125 virtual anatomies were created, with 25 different combinations of annulus and sinotubular junction. Effective height, coaptation height and mechanical cusp stress were calculated with the valves in closed configuration.

RESULTS

Generally, within the analysed range of geometric heights, changes to the annular diameter yielded a stronger impact than sinotubular junction diameter changes for optimal valve configuration. The best results were obtained with the sinotubular junction being 2-4 mm larger than the annulus, leading to higher effective height, normal coaptation height and lower stress. Within the range tested, stenosis did not occur due to annular reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

In tricuspid aortic valves, the geometric height can be used to predict ideal post-repair annular and sinotubular junction dimensions for optimal valve configuration. Such an ideal configuration is associated with reduced cusp stress.

Predictors of long-term stenosis in bicuspid aortic valve repair

OBJECTIVES

The use of modern techniques for bicuspid aortic valve repair has been shown to provide safe and durable results against recurrent regurgitation. However, an emerging body of evidence is indicating that aortic stenosis might be an additional late complication of these procedures. To date, the pathogenesis and clinical impact of aortic stenosis after bicuspid aortic valve repair are poorly understood.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 367 patients with bicuspid aortic valve repair was performed to identify predictors of reoperation for stenosis. Bicuspid aortic valve repair was performed using a combination of procedures on the leaflet, annulus, and aortic root.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 8 years, reoperation for stenosis was required in 33 patients (9.0%). Freedom from reoperation for stenosis was 100%, 99.6%, 91.7%, and 74.9% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. The following factors were independently associated with reoperation for aortic stenosis: Leaflet or raphe resection with shaving was a protective factor (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.71; P = .004), whereas the use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for free-edge running suture (hazard ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-5.57; P = .019), supracoronary replacement of the ascending aorta in combination with valve repair (hazard ratio, 5.41; 95% confidence interval, 2.11-13.85; P = .001), and the need for a second aortic crossclamp (hazard ratio, 10.95; 95% confidence interval, 2.80-42.80; P = .001) were associated with increased risk of reoperation for aortic stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

While confirming previous findings, our analysis suggests that the inability to restore leaflet mobility and polytetrafluoroethylene for free-edge running suture are risk factors for stenosis. The so-called ascending phenotypes are probably more prone to stenosis. If the first attempt to repair is unsuccessful, the risk of late reoperation for aortic stenosis is high.

Aortic Valve Repair with External Annuloplasty in Bicuspid versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Patients

Surgical repair for regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is promising but underutilized due to perceived complexities and lack of long-term data. This study evaluated the efficacy of valve-sparing root remodeling (VSRR) or isolated valve repair combined with calibrated external ring annuloplasty in BAV versus tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. All patients operated on for aortic regurgitation and/or aneurysm at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included and entered into the Aortic Valve Insufficiency and ascending aorta Aneurysm InternATiOnal Registry (AVIATOR). Patients with successful repair at index surgery (100% in the BAV group, 93% in the TAV group, p = 0.044) were included in a systemic follow-up with echocardiography at regular intervals. Among 132 patients, 58 were in the BAV (44%) and 74 in the TAV group (56%). There were no inter-group differences in preoperative patient characteristics, except BAV patients being significantly younger (47 ± 18 y vs. 60 ± 14 y, p < 0.001) and having narrower aortic roots at the level of sinuses (41 ± 6 mm vs. 46 ± 13 mm, p < 0.001) and sinotubular junctions (39 ± 10 mm vs. 42 ± 11, p = 0.032). No perioperative deaths were recorded. At four years, there was no significant difference in terms of overall survival (96.3% BAV vs. 97.2% TAV, p = 0.373), freedom from valve reintervention (85.2% BAV vs. 93.4% TAV, p = 0.905), and freedom from severe aortic regurgitation (94.1% BAV vs. 82.9% TAV, p = 0.222). Surgical repair of BAV combined with extra-aortic annuloplasty can be performed with low perioperative morbidity and mortality and excellent mid-term results which are comparable to TAV repair.

Bicuspid aortic valve repair-current techniques, outcomes, challenges, and future perspectives

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart condition that can lead to some valve-related complications, such as aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation, and is often associated with aortic root dilation. With the development and refinement of BAV repair techniques over the past three decades, surgical repair of BAV has emerged as an effective treatment option, offering symptomatic relief and improved outcomes. This review aims to summarize the current techniques, outcomes, and challenges of BAV repair, and to provide potential future perspectives in the field.

Aortic Valve-Sparing Operations

Aortic valve-sparing operations were developed >3 decades ago and have become part of the surgical armamentarium to treat patients with aortic root and ascending aortic aneurysms. Although remodeling of the aortic root is physiologically sounder than reimplantation of the aortic valve, most surgeons seem to prefer the latter. This review summarizes the views of one of the pioneers of aortic valve-sparing operation and includes their development, the various modifications that occurred over the years, comparative outcomes with aortic root replacement with valved conduits, outcomes from several recently reported series, and the future directions. The author argues that comparisons between aortic valve-sparing operations and aortic root replacement with valved conduits based on retrospective studies are inappropriate because these 2 types of surgery are performed in patients with different aortic valve pathology. Late outcomes after aortic valve-sparing operations have not been consistent among various reports and raise the question of surgical expertise and patients' selection. Aortic valve-sparing operations are the best treatment for young patients with aortic root aneurysm and normal aortic cusps. Further studies are needed to define their role in the management of patients with diseased aortic cusps.

Aortic valve visualization and pressurization device: a novel device for intraoperative evaluation of aortic valve repair procedures

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve repair procedures are technically challenging, and current intraoperative evaluation methods often fail to predict the final echocardiographic result. We have developed a novel intraoperative aortic valve visualization and pressurization (AVP) device, enabling valve inspection under physiological conditions, and measuring aortic valve insufficiency (AI) during cardioplegic arrest.

METHODS

The AVP device is attached to the (neo)aorta, after any type of aortic valve repair, while the heart is arrested. The root is pressurized (60-80 mmHg) using a saline solution and an endoscope is introduced. The valve is inspected, and the amount of valvular leakage is measured. Postoperative 'gold standard' transesophageal echocardiogram measurements of AI are performed and compared against regurgitation volume measured.

RESULTS

In 24 patients undergoing valve-sparing root replacement, the AVP device was used. In 22 patients, postoperative echocardiographic AI was ≤ grade 1. The median leakage was 90 ml/min, IQR 60-120 ml/min. In 3 patients, additional adjustments after visual inspection was performed. In 2 patients, with complex anatomy, the valve was replaced. In one, after evaluation with the device, there was undesirable result visually and residual AI of 330 ml/min, and in another, 260 ml/min residual AI was measured and valve restriction on visual inspection.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel AVP device enables intraoperative evaluation of the valve under physiological conditions, while still on arrested heart, and allows for targeted adjustments. The AVP device can be an important aid for intraoperative evaluation of the aortic valve, during valve repair and valve-sparing procedures, thereby making the operative result more predictable and the operation more efficient.

Expert Consensus Statement: Anatomy, Imaging, and Nomenclature of Congenital Aortic Root Malformations

Over the past 2 decades, several categorizations have been proposed for the abnormalities of the aortic root. These schemes have mostly been devoid of input from specialists of congenital cardiac disease. The aim of this review is to provide a classification, from the perspective of these specialists, based on an understanding of normal and abnormal morphogenesis and anatomy, with emphasis placed on the features of clinical and surgical relevance. We contend that the description of the congenitally malformed aortic root is simplified when approached in a fashion that recognizes the normal root to be made up of 3 leaflets, supported by their own sinuses, with the sinuses themselves separated by the interleaflet triangles. The malformed root, usually found in the setting of 3 sinuses, can also be found with 2 sinuses, and very rarely with 4 sinuses. This permits description of trisinuate, bisinuate, and quadrisinuate variants, respectively. This feature then provides the basis for classification of the anatomical and functional number of leaflets present. By offering standardized terms and definitions, we submit that our classification will be suitable for those working in all cardiac specialties, whether pediatric or adult. It is of equal value in the settings of acquired or congenital cardiac disease. Our recommendations will serve to amend and/or add to the existing International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code, along with the Eleventh iteration of the International Classification of Diseases provided by the World Health Organization.

Trileaflet Semilunar Valve Reconstruction: Acute Porcine in Vivo Evaluation

Objective: The surgical treatment of malformed semilunar valves in congenital heart defects is challenging in terms of providing both longevity and the potential to grow with the recipient. We investigated a new surgical technique "Trileaflet Semilunar Valve Reconstruction" in an acute porcine model, a technique with geometrical properties that could remain sufficient and allow for some growth with the child. Methods: An acute 60-kg porcine model was used. With echocardiography, baseline pulmonary valvular geometry and hemodynamics were investigated. On cardiopulmonary bypass, the pulmonary leaflets were explanted, and the Trileaflet Semilunar Valve Reconstruction was performed with customized homograft-treated pericardial neo-leaflets. Off bypass, hemodynamics was reassessed. Results: Twelve animals were investigated. The neo-valves were found sufficient in ten animals and with minimal regurgitation in two animals. The neo-valve had a peak gradient of 3 ± 2 mm Hg with a peak velocity of 0.8 ± 0.2 m/s. The coaptation in the neo-valve had a mean increase of 4 ± 3 mm, P < .001. The neo-valve had a windmill shape in the echocardiographic short-axis view, and the neo-leaflets billowed at the annular plane in the long-axis view. Conclusions: In this acute porcine model, the neo-valve had no clinically significant regurgitation or stenosis. The neo-valve had an increased coaptation, a windmill shape, and leaflets that billowed at the annular plane. These geometric findings may allow for sustained sufficiency as the annular and pulmonary artery dimension increase with the child's growth. Further long-term studies should be performed to evaluate the efficacy and the growth potential.

Expert Consensus Statement: Anatomy, Imaging, and Nomenclature of Congenital Aortic Root Malformations

Over the past 2 decades, several categorizations have been proposed for the abnormalities of the aortic root. These schemes have mostly been devoid of input from specialists of congenital cardiac disease. The aim of this review is to provide a classification, from the perspective of these specialists, based on an understanding of normal and abnormal morphogenesis and anatomy, with emphasis placed on the features of clinical and surgical relevance. We contend that the description of the congenitally malformed aortic root is simplified when approached in a fashion that recognizes the normal root to be made up of 3 leaflets, supported by their own sinuses, with the sinuses themselves separated by the interleaflet triangles. The malformed root, usually found in the setting of 3 sinuses, can also be found with 2 sinuses, and very rarely with 4 sinuses. This permits description of trisinuate, bisinuate, and quadrisinuate variants, respectively. This feature then provides the basis for classification of the anatomical and functional number of leaflets present. By offering standardized terms and definitions, we submit that our classification will be suitable for those working in all cardiac specialties, whether pediatric or adult. It is of equal value in the settings of acquired or congenital cardiac disease. Our recommendations will serve to amend and/or add to the existing International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code, along with the Eleventh iteration of the International Classification of Diseases provided by the World Health Organization.

Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure

OBJECTIVES

After a Ross procedure, autograft failure can occur. At reoperation, repair of the autograft preserves the advantages of the Ross procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess mid-term results after reoperation of a failed autograft.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2022, 30 consecutive patients (83% male; age 41 ± 11 years) underwent autograft reintervention between 60 days and 24 years (median 10 years) after a Ross procedure. The initial technique varied, full-root replacement (n = 25) being the most frequent. The indication for reoperation was isolated autograft regurgitation (n = 7), root dilatation (>43 mm) with (n = 17) or without (n = 2) autograft regurgitation, mixed dysfunction (n = 2) and endocarditis (n = 2). In 4 instances, the valve was replaced by valve (n = 1) or combined valve and root replacement (n = 3). Valve-sparing procedures consisted of isolated valve repair (n = 7) or root replacement (n = 19), and tubular aortic replacement. Cusp repair was performed in all but 2. Mean follow-up was 5.4 ± 6 years (35 days to 24 years).

RESULTS

Mean cross-clamp and perfusion times were 74 ± 26 and 132 ± 64 min. There were 2 perioperative deaths (7%; both valve replacement) and 2 patients died late (32 days to 1.2 years postoperatively). Freedom from cardiac death at 10 years was 96% after valve repair and 50% after replacement. Two patients required reoperation (1.68 and 16 years) following repair. One underwent valve replacement for cusp perforation, the other, root remodelling for dilatation. Freedom from autograft reintervention at 15 years was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure can be performed as valve-sparing operations in the majority of cases. With valve-sparing, long-term survival and freedom from reoperation are excellent.

Late results of aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to analyze the long-term outcomes of tricuspid aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation and the impact of different annuloplasty techniques.

METHODS

The study cohort consists of 127 consecutive patients who received aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation in the tricuspid aortic valve between 1996 and 2019 in our institution. Exclusion criteria were aorta dilatation (≥45 mm), connective tissue disease, active endocarditis, type A dissection, and rheumatic disease. Mean age of patients was 55.6 ± 16 years, and 80% were male. Median follow-up was 6.4 years. Time-to-event analysis was performed, as well as risk of death, reoperation, and aortic regurgitation recurrence.

RESULTS

Cusp repair was performed in 117 patients (92%), and annuloplasty was performed in 126 patients (99%) with Cabrol stitch (73%), reimplantation technique (19.7%), or ring annuloplasty (6.3%). There was no hospital mortality. At 10 and 14 years, overall survival was 81% ± 5% and 71% ± 6%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation was 80% ± 5% and 73% ± 6%, respectively. Age and left coronary cusp repair were independent predictors of reoperation. Freedom from recurrent severe aortic regurgitation (>2+) was 73% ± 5% and 66% ± 7% at 10 and 12 years, respectively. Age, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and patch repair were independent predictors of recurrent aortic regurgitation. Type of annuloplasty had no impact on survival or reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation in the tricuspid aortic valve is a safe procedure, and durability at 14 years is acceptable. In this study, the annuloplasty technique did not influence repair durability as was found in bicuspid aortic valve repair or aortic valve-sparing surgery. Severity of cusp pathology seems to be the main determinant of repair durability.

Current controversies in aortic valve-preserving surgery

The clinical outcome of severe aortic regurgitation (AR) remains suboptimal, but surgery has been shown to have survival benefit over medical therapy. Postoperative survival is inferior in patients with reduced left ventricular function, and therefore early surgical intervention is recommended. Aortic valvuloplasty (AVP) is an attractive option to avoid the major drawbacks of prosthetic valves but has not been widely adopted. The etiology of AR is classified functionally into three groups: normal leaflet motion (type I), cusp prolapse (type II), and restriction (type III). Type I with dilatation of the sinus of Valsalva (type Ib) can be repaired by aortic valve reimplantation or aortic root remodeling with similar valve stability. Type I with dilatation of the aortic annulus (type Ic) can be managed by annuloplasty. Type II can be corrected by plication or resuspension techniques. Pericardial patch is necessary in AVP for type Id (perforation/fenestration) and type III but is associated with risk of recurrence. Bicuspid aortic valve is classified according to commissure angle: symmetrical, asymmetrical, and very asymmetrical. Tricuspidization is recommended for repair of very asymmetrical valves to avoid postoperative stenosis. Recent progress has achieved similar reoperation rates between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve repair. For Marfan syndrome, valve-sparing root replacement is advantageous compared to Bentall operation regarding late survival, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, and endocarditis. Similar findings have been reported in acute aortic dissection. Both remodeling and reimplantation procedures provide similar favorable outcomes in these settings. Recent advances in AVP are summarized by quantitative assessment of cusp configuration (effective height and geometric height), graft size decision, use of template to cut the graft, and videoscopic assessment of post-repair cusp configuration. Due to these advances, AVP shows superior results to replacement surgery. Further concrete evidence with larger case volumes and longer observation periods are necessary to popularize AVP.

Significance of Effective Height and Mechanism of Regurgitation in Tricuspid Aortic Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

Isolated repair of the regurgitant tricuspid aortic valve has become an increasingly practiced alternative to replacement, even though durability data are scarce. We analyzed the midterm results of tricuspid aortic valve repair to determine whether the mechanism of regurgitation or operative technique influences the results.

METHODS

Between December 1997 and August 2014, 264 patients underwent isolated tricuspid aortic valve repair in our institution. The mean age was 59 ± 16 years; 77% (n = 203) were male. Clinical and operative data were recorded. The patients were observed clinically and echocardiographically.

RESULTS

Survival was 76.7% ± 3.5% after 10 years and 57.2% ± 11.5% after 15 years (median, 224 months). Intraoperative measurement of effective height was significantly associated with improved long-term survival (P = .001). Cumulative freedom from reoperation was 88.1% ± 2.1% after 5 years and 73.3% ± 4.2% after 10 years. Freedom from recurrent aortic regurgitation 2+ was 85.9% ± 5.2% after 5 years and 66.9% ± 5.2% after 10 years. Freedom from reoperation was significantly higher in patients with cusp prolapse compared with retraction as the primary regurgitation mechanism (P = .041). The use of circular annuloplasty had no significant influence on survival or durability.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival after tricuspid aortic valve repair is good, considering the age of the patients. Repair of cusp retraction has a poorer durability compared with repair of prolapse. The use of effective height in tricuspid aortic valve repair is associated with improved survival.

Aortic cusp abnormalities in patients with trileaflet aortic valve and root aneurysm

BACKGROUND

The frequency of concomitant cusp pathology in aortic root aneurysm with or without aortic regurgitation is not well known, and the sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional trans-oesophageal echocardiography (2D TEE) in its detection has not yet been specified.

OBJECTIVES

We analysed the type and frequency of concomitant cusp alterations in root aneurysm referred for surgery. Sensitivity and specificity of 2D TEE in detecting these alterations were determined.

METHODS

In 582 patients (age 56.8±15.4 years, 453 male) with trileaflet aortic valves undergoing root replacement for regurgitation (n=347) or aneurysm (n=235), details of valve morphology were analysed. In a subcohort (n=281), intraoperative TEEs were analysed retrospectively and correlated with the intraoperative findings.

RESULTS

Any cusp pathology was present in 90.9% (prolapse: n=473; retraction: n=30; calcification: n=14; fenestration: n=12), morphologically normal cusps were seen in only 52 patients (8.93%). Valve-sparing surgery was performed in 525 (90.2%) instances, composite replacement in 57 (9.8%). Preoperative TEE correctly identified any postroot repair prolapse in 70.6% and any retraction in 85%. The sensitivity of TEE in detecting any prolapse was 68.6% (specificity of 79.5%). The sensitivity was highest for the right cusp and intermediate for the non-coronary.

CONCLUSIONS

Cusp prolapse is frequent in root aneurysm and trileaflet aortic valves. Prolapse is underdiagnosed by 2D TEE in many cases because pre-existent stretching of cusp tissue is masked by the geometric effects of root dilatation.

Fifteen-year experience with the Tirone David procedure in bicuspid aortic valve: A safe option

BACKGROUND

We evaluated short and midterm outcomes with use of aortic valve-sparing root replacement to treat bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs).

METHODS

From December 2007 to January 2022, all patients with BAVs who underwent aortic root replacement using Tirone's procedure were included. This study based on department database information for retrospective and follow-up data.

RESULTS

Among 51 adults undergoing aortic root replacement using Tirone's procedure, the mean age was 47.4 ± 12.5 years, and most were men (92.2%). Three presented with a dysmorphic syndrome and one had Marfan's syndrome. All patients were alive at 30 days, and as of January 2022, 45 were alive, two were lost to follow-up, and there were four noncardiac deaths. Two patients had infectious endocarditis and needed a Bentall's procedure. One patient had a double biologic valve replacement in the context of severe mitral insufficiency with moderate aortic stenosis at 4.5 years postprocedure. Echocardiographic follow-up showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 63 ± 7% (n = 36), V_max 2 ± 0.6 m/s (n = 17), and a mean gradient of 9.4 ± 5.4 mmHg (n = 27). No patients had grade 3 or 4 aortic regurgitation, one patient had grade 2, and four had grade 1.

CONCLUSION

Tirone's procedure is an option for BAV surgery, with good safety and outcomes, especially in younger patients.

Outcomes of Valve-Sparing Surgery in Heritable Aortic Disorders: Results from the AVIATOR Registry

OBJECTIVES

Root reimplantation has been the favored approach for patients with heritable aortic disorder (HAD) requiring valve-sparring root replacement (VSRR). In the past few years, root remodelling with annuloplasty has emerged as an alternative to root reimplantation in the general population. The aim of this study was to examine the late outcomes of patients with HAD undergoing VSRR and compare different techniques.

METHODS

Using the AVIATOR registry, data were collected from 5 North American and European centers. Patients were divided in 4 groups according to the technique of valve-sparing used (root reimplantation, root remodelling with ring annuloplasty, root remodelling with suture annuloplasty and root remodelling alone). The primary end-points were freedom from aortic regurgitation (AR) ≥2 and freedom from reintervention on the aortic valve. Secondary end-points were survival and changes in annular dimensions over time.

RESULTS

A total of 237 patients were included in the study (reimplantation= 100, remodelling + ring annuloplasty= 76, remodelling + suture annuloplasty= 34, remodelling alone= 27). The majority of patients had Marfan syndrome (82%). Preoperative AR ≥ 2 was present in 41% of the patients. Operative mortality was 0.4% (n = 1). No differences were found between techniques in terms of postoperative AR ≥ 2 (p = 0.58), reintervention (p = 0.52) and survival (p = 0.59). Changes in aortic annulus dimension were significantly different at 10 years (p < 0.05), a difference that started to emerge 4 after years surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, VSRR are safe and durable procedures in patients with HAD. Nevertheless, root remodelling alone is associated with late annular dilatation. Addition of an annuloplasty, however, results in similar freedom from AR, reintervention, survival, and changes in annulus size compared to reimplantation.

Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Review

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect. Prevalence of isolated BAV in the general pediatric population is about 0.8%, but it has been reported to be as high as 85% in patients with aortic coarctation. A genetic basis has been recognized, with great heterogeneity. Standard BAV terminology, recently proposed on the basis of morpho-functional assessment by transthoracic echocardiography, may be applied also to the pediatric population. Apart from neonatal stenotic BAV, progression of valve dysfunction and/or of the associated aortic dilation seems to be slow during pediatric age and complications are reported to be much rarer in comparison with adults. When required, because of severe BAV dysfunction, surgery is most often the therapeutic choice; however, the ideal initial approach to treat severe aortic stenosis in children or adolescents is not completely defined yet, and a percutaneous approach may be considered in selected cases as a palliative option in order to postpone surgery. A comprehensive and tailored evaluation is needed to define the right intervals for cardiologic evaluation, indications for sport activity and the right timing for intervention.

Aortic valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement for root aneurysm: The CAVIAAR Multicentric Study

AIMS

Despite growing evidence that aortic valve repair improves long-term patient outcomes and quality of life, aortic valves are mostly replaced. We evaluate the effect of aortic valve repair versus replacement in patients with dystrophic aortic root aneurysm up to 4 years.

METHODS

The multicentric CAVIAAR prospective cohort study enrolled 261 patients: 130 underwent standardized aortic valve repair (REPAIR) consisting of remodelling root repair with expansible aortic ring annuloplasty, and 131 received mechanical composite valve and graft replacement (REPLACE). Primary outcome was a composite criterion of mortality, reoperation, thromboembolic or major bleeding events, endocarditis or operating site infections, pacemaker implantation and heart failure, analyzed with propensity score-weighted Cox model analysis. Secondary outcomes included Major Adverse Valve Related Events (MAVRE) and components of primary outcome.

RESULTS

Mean age was 56.1 years, valve was bicuspid in 115 patients (44.7%). Up to 4 years, REPAIR did not significantly differ from REPLACE in terms of primary outcome (HR 0.66 [0.39; 1.12]), but showed significantly less valve-related deaths (HR 0.09 [0.02; 0.34]) and major bleeding events (HR 0.37 [0.16; 0.85]) without an increased risk of valve-related reoperation (HR 2.10 [0.64; 6.96]). When accounting for occurrence of multiple events in a single patient, REPAIR group had half the occurrence of MAVRE (RR 0.51 [0.31; 0.86]).

CONCLUSION

Although primary outcome did not significantly differ between REPAIR and REPLACE group, the trend is in favour of REPAIR by a significant reduction of valve-related deaths and major bleeding events. Long-term follow-up beyond 4 years is needed to confirm these findings.

Aortic valve leaflet and root dimensions in normal tricuspid aortic valves: A computed tomography study

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study was to use coronary computed tomography in patients with normal tricuspid aortic valves to perform detailed aortic root and aortic valve geometric analysis with a focus on the asymmetry of the three leaflets.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of anonymized coronary computed tomography angiograms was performed using dedicated software, where manual aortic root segmentation and marking of several points of interest were followed by automated measurements of aortic root and leaflets. Asymmetry of the three leaflets in individual patients was assessed by calculating absolute and relative differences between the largest and the smallest of the three leaflets.

RESULTS

We analyzed 70 aortic valves, the mean patient age was 53 ± 11 years, and 50% (n = 35) of patients were female. All aortic valves were tricuspid, without calcifications and aortic roots were of normal dimensions. Some degree of asymmetry was present in all analyzed valves. Absolute and relative differences for free margin length were 3.2 ± 1.4 mm and 9.3 ± 3.8%, respectively. The largest relative difference was noted in the coaptation area (36.5 ± 16.5%) and the smallest in leaflet effective height (6.1 ± 4.8%). Using predefined cutoff criteria for absolute differences in leaflet dimensions, 86% of the valves were classified as asymmetric.

CONCLUSIONS

Most normal tricuspid aortic valves show some degree of asymmetry. Equal free margin length of the three leaflets is not needed for normal tricuspid aortic valve function. Leaflet effective height showed the least amount of asymmetry confirming its importance in keeping the aortic valve competent.

Valve-sparing versus valve-replacing aortic root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an alternative to valve-replacing aortic root replacement (VRARR) with valved-conduits based on recent guidelines for clinical practice. This study investigated outcomes of these two procedures in patients with nonstenotic valves.

METHODS

Between January 7, 2007 and June 30, 2019, 475 patients with aortic root aneurysm without aortic stenosis underwent VSARR (151) or VRARR (324) techniques. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used to alleviate confounding. Endpoints were 30-day mortality, 8-year survival and reoperation, aortic regurgitation, and valve gradients.

RESULTS

PSM created 69 pairs of patients with a mean age 52 ± 13 years (10.1% Marfan syndrome, 34.8% bicuspid aortic valve). There was no statistically significant difference in major perioperative morbidity or 30-day mortality (0% VSARR vs. 1.4% VRARR; p = 0.316). Overall survival was significantly higher (p = 0.025) in the VSARR group versus the VRARR group (8-year estimates 100% vs. 88.9%, respectively), while freedom from valve reoperation was similar (p = 0.97, 8-year estimates 90.9% vs. 96.7%, respectively). Freedom from > moderate-severe AR was not significantly different (p = 0.08, 8-year estimates 90.0% VSARR group vs. 100% VRARR), but mean valve gradients at last follow-up were better in the VSARR group (5.9 vs. 13.2 mmHg, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

VSARR is a safe operation in patients with aortic root aneurysm and nonstenotic aortic valves in the hands of experienced surgeons. Freedom from reoperation is similar and the mode of aortic valve failure differs between the two groups.

Stereogram of the Living Heart, Lung, and Adjacent Structures

Innovations in invasive cardiovascular diagnostics and therapeutics, not only limited to transcatheter approaches but also involving surgical approaches, are based on a precise appreciation of the three-dimensional living heart anatomy. Rapid advancements in three-dimensional cardiovascular imaging technologies in the 21st century have supported such innovations through the periprocedural assessment of the clinical anatomy of the living heart. However, even if high-resolution volume-rendered images are reconstructed, they cannot provide appropriate depth perception when displayed and shared on a two-dimensional display, which is widely used in clinical settings. Currently, images reconstructed from clinical datasets can visualize fine details of the cardiovascular anatomy. Therefore, this is an optimal time for cardiologists and cardiac surgeons to revisit the classic technology, stereopsis, and obtain bonus information from carefully reconstructed clinical images. Using anaglyphs or cross/uncross-fusion of paired images, striking depth perception can be readily obtained without the need for expensive equipment. This conventional technique, when applied to high-resolution volume-rendered images, may help in obtaining appropriate diagnostics, choosing optimal therapeutics, securing procedural success, and preventing complications. Furthermore, it can be used for anatomical education. In this review, we demonstrate multiple stereoscopic images reconstructed from cardiac computed tomographic datasets and discuss their clinical and educational implications.

Relationship Between Leaflets and Root in Normal Aortic Valve Based on Computed Tomography Imaging: Implication for Aortic Valve Repair

Objective: By assessing the normal dimensions and the relationship between the aortic root and leaflets in Chinese population, the objective of this three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT)-based study was to establish a matching reference for leaflets and aortic root for aortic valve (AV) repair.

Method: Electrocardiogram-gated multi-detector CT was performed on 168 Chinese participants with a normal aortic valve. Measurements of the aortic annuli and leaflets were obtained. The correlations between and the ratios of the specific root and leaflet measurements were analyzed. The references for the leaflet and root dimensions were suggested based on geometric height (gH) using a linear regression equation. The utility of the ratios was tested with CT images of 15 patients who underwent aortic valve repair.

Result: The mean annulus diameter (AD), sino-tubular junction (STJ) diameter, geometric height (gH), effective height (eH), free margin length (FML), commissural height (ComH), inter-commissural distance (ICD), and coaptation height (CH) were 22.4 ± 1.7 mm, 27.3 ± 2, 0.4 mm, 15.5 ± 1.7 mm, 8.9 ± 1.2 mm, 32.0 ± 3.4 mm, 17.9 ± 1.9 mm, 23.1 ± 2.3 mm, and 3.1 ± 0.6 mm, respectively. The gH/AD, FML/ICD, and eH/ComH ratios were 0.69 ± 0.07, 1.38 ± 0.08, and 0.50 ± 0.07, respectively. The gH correlated with all other leaflet and root measurements (P < 0.01), whereas the FML demonstrated a better correlation with ICD compared with gH (R² = 0.75, and R² = 0.37, respectively). The FML/ICD and eH/ComH ratios might be used to assess leaflet-root mismatch and post-repair leaflet billowing.

Conclusion: The normal aortic valve measurements based on 3DCT revealed a specific relationship between the root and leaflets; and this will guide the development of an objective method of aortic valve repair.

Bicuspid aortic valve repair with external or subcommissural annuloplasty-echocardiographic prospective trial

BACKGROUND

The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be repaired using various techniques. This study presents a prospective comparison of external and subcommissural aortic annuloplasty.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients (38 males, age: 43.9 ± 15.8 years) with BAV insufficiency with or without aortic dilatation underwent valve repair in a single institution. They were prospectively allocated to one of two groups based on the aortic annulus stabilization technique: 25 patients were operated on using the subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA) and 25 using the external complete annuloplasty (EA). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients before the operation and 1 and 3 years after the operation. Moreover, mortality and morbidity at 7 years were evaluated.

RESULTS

In prospective echocardiographic comparison, EA was associated with smaller diameter of the aortic annulus (24.1 ± 2.6 mm vs. 25.8±2.1 mm, p < .05) and lower mean and peak transvalvular gradients (7 ± 4 mmHg vs. 13 ± 4 mmHg, p = .02 and 15.3 ± 9.7 mmHg vs. 20.7 ± 5.6 mmHg, p = .03, respectively). No patients died or required reoperation due to recurrent insufficiency at 6,81 (interquartile range-0,17) years after the operation. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial freedom from aortic regurgitation (AR) grade ≥2 or gradient > 20 mmHg at 35.1 ± 3.6 months years was 96% (24 out of 25) for patients who had external annuloplasty and amounted to 76% (19 out of 25) for those who had SCA, p = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

External annuloplasty performed during repair of the BAV is associated with better hemodynamics at medium-term follow-up compared to SCA.

Understanding the Aortic Root Using Computed Tomographic Assessment: A Potential Pathway to Improved Customized Surgical Repair

There is continued interest in surgical repair of both the congenitally malformed aortic valve, and the valve with acquired dysfunction. Aortic valvar repair based on a geometric approach has demonstrated improved durability and outcomes. Such an approach requires a thorough comprehension of the complex 3-dimensional anatomy of both the normal and congenitally malformed aortic root. In this review, we provide an understanding of this anatomy based on the features that can accurately be revealed by contrast-enhanced computed tomographic imaging. We highlight the complimentary role that such imaging, with multiplanar reformatting and 3-dimensional reconstructions, can play in selection of patients, and subsequent presurgical planning for valvar repair. The technique compliments other established techniques for perioperative imaging, with echocardiography maintaining its central role in assessment, and enhances direct surgical evaluation. This additive morphological and functional information holds the potential for improving selection of patients, surgical planning, subsequent surgical repair, and hopefully the subsequent outcomes.

Single-Leaflet Aortic Valve Reconstruction Utilizing the Ozaki Technique in Patients With Congenital Aortic Valve Disease

Evaluate outcomes of single leaflet aortic valve reconstruction using Ozaki sizer and template. Single institute retrospective analysis between August 2015 and August 2019. Thirty-three patients, median age 9.3 years and weight 29.2 kg underwent single leaflet Ozaki repair. Preoperative indications were: AR (n = 17), AS (n = 3) or AS/AR (n = 13). Baseline anatomy was unicuspid (n = 15), bicuspid (n = 9) or tricuspid (n = 9). Two patients had endocarditis. Prior interventions included balloon valvuloplasty (n = 22) and aortic valve repair (n = 9). Pre-op average native annulus diameter was 19.6 mm and peak echo gradient was 36 mm Hg. Autologous pericardium, Photofix and CardioCel bovine pericardium were used in 26, 5, and 2 patients. Non-coronary sinus enlargement was required in 3 and aortic root reduction in 9 patients. Single leaflet reconstruction was done for the right coronary cusp (n = 25), non-coronary cusp in (n = 6) and left coronary cusp (n = 2). Additional procedures were done in 30 patients. Median ICU and hospital LOS were 2.1 and 6.3 days. There were no early re-interventions or conversions to valve replacement and one unrelated mortality.en At discharge, all patients had < moderate AR and/or AS with average peak gradients of 15 mm Hg. The median follow-up was 1.1 year, (IQR 0.7-1.8 years). Freedom from ≥ moderate AR and AS at 2 years was 76% and 86%. One patient required surgical re-intervention for severe AR 1.5 years after surgery for inflammatory infiltrate with calcification and fibrosis. Single-leaflet aortic valve leaflet reconstruction utilizing the Ozaki technique has promising early results and can be considered in patients when there are acceptable native leaflets.

Characteristics of the aortic root morphology in conotruncal anomaly of the congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Aortopathy is a well-known feature of conotruncal anomalies, but it remains unknown whether valve-sparing aortic root replacement, such as the David procedure, is feasible in young patients with severe aortic regurgitation. We assessed the aortic valve complex and aortic root morphology in patients with conotruncal anomalies using echocardiography. Furthermore, we evaluated the relevant factors associated with aortopathy in this population.

METHODS

A total of 172 adult patients with conotruncal anomalies were enrolled in this study. Dimensions of the aortic valve complex were measured at the level of the sinus of Valsalva (SV) and sinotubular junction (STJ). The geometric height (GH), effective height (EH), and coaptation length (CL) were also assessed to analyze the aortic valve complex in detail.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 172 patients were excluded due to poor imaging; 105 patients with tetralogy of Fallot, 24 with double outlet right ventricle, and 27 with transposition of the great arteries totaling 156 patients (32+/-11 years old) were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into four groups: Group 1 (98 patients) had no dilatation of SV or STJ; Group 2 (32 patients) had dilated SV and STJ; Group 3 (14 patients) had dilated SV; and Group 4 (12 patients) had dilated STJ. GH and EH in Group 2 were also highest among the four, whereas CL was not significantly shortened. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, age, and conduit repair were risk factors for aortopathy in this population.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dilated SV and STJ (Group 2) were the most common among the patients with aortopathy (Groups 2, 3, and 4). The aortic valve leaflets themselves were enlarged, and the poor coaptation of the valve tips was compensated in spite of aortic root dilatation, which plays an important role in preventing severe aortic regurgitation in this population. Overall, valve-sparing aortic valve replacement is more feasible in the young populations than we expected.

Optimal Management of Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation - How to Determine Cutoff Values for Surgical Intervention?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common valvular heart disease, but the optimal timing of surgical intervention remains controversial. In the natural history of chronic severe AR, sudden death is rare, and the annual mortality rate is comparatively low. Considering the hemodynamic features of combined volume and pressure overload and long-term compensation in patients with chronic AR, symptoms related to AR do not frequently occur. Therefore, the progression of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is a key factor in determining the timing of surgical intervention in patients with severe chronic AR. In addition to symptoms, an ejection fraction <50% and an LV endsystolic diameter (LVESD) >45 mm are appropriate cutoff values for surgical intervention in Japanese patients, whereas LV end-diastolic diameter is not a good indicator. An LVESD index of 25 mm/m²is controversial, because adjusting for body size may cause overcorrection in Japanese patients who have a small body size compared with Westerners. Accumulation of data from the Japanese population is indispensable for establishing guidelines on optimal management of patients with chronic AR.

Failures of Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement using the Root Remodeling Technique

BACKGROUND

Valve failure may occur after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Little is known about the exact mechanisms of failure. We analyzed our experience with reoperations after aortic root remodeling to determine failure modes, operative risk, and long-term outcome.

METHODS

Between 11/1995 and 12/2019, 1084 patients were treated by root remodeling. Of these, 54 (49 male, 8 to 79 years) underwent reoperation for valve failure (1 week to 16 years postoperatively). The indications for reoperation were aortic regurgitation (n=39), aortic stenosis (n=6), endocarditis (n=7), or ventricular septal defect (n=2). The main causes of valve failure were cusp repair failure (n=29), endocarditis (n=7), and cusp retraction (n=8). The patients were treated by valve replacement (n=40) or cusp repair (n=14). In 6 individuals, combined replacement of valve and root was performed. All 54 patients were followed (mean 69±54 months after reoperation), 1 patient was lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

No patient died in hospital or developed atrioventricular block; twelve patients died late with 10- and 15-year survival of 87%±5.1% and 64%±10.6%. Of the 14 patients who underwent repeat cusp repair, 7 (50%) are still alive with stable valve function, 17 months to 15 years after their reoperation. Eleven patients required a second reoperation leading to a freedom from repeat reintervention of 68%±9.7% at 15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The main causes of failure of root remodeling are cusp related. Reoperations can be performed with low morbidity and mortality. In selected patients, isolated cusp repair may be an option.

Commissural repositioning in bicuspid aortic valve repair: an in vitro acute model to explore and explain different results

OBJECTIVES

Commissural orientation <160° is a recognized risk factor for bicuspid aortic valve repair failure. Based on this observation, repairing this subtype of aortic valve by reorienting the 2 commissures at 180° has recently been proposed.

METHODS

Nine porcine hearts with aortic annulus diameters of 25 mm were selected. A pathological model of a Sievers 1 bicuspid aortic valve was obtained by suturing the coaptation line between the left and right leaflets. Each heart underwent reimplantation procedures both in the native (120°) and the reoriented (180°) configuration. After the operation, each sample was tested on a pulse duplicator at rest (heart rate 60 beats per min) and with mild exercise (heart rate 90 beats per min) conditions.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was noted in mean and peak transvalvular aortic gradients between the 2 configurations at rest (18.6 ± 5 vs 17.5 ± 4 for the mean aortic gradient; 42.8 ± 12.7 vs 36.3 ± 5.8 for the peak aortic gradient) but the group with the 120°-oriented commissures had significantly higher mean transaortic gradients compared to the group with the 180°-oriented commissures at initial exercise stress conditions (30.1 ± 9.1 vs 24.9 ± 3.8; p value 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The 180° commissural reorientation of the asymmetrical bicuspid aortic valve does not improve the transvalvular aortic gradient in an acute model at rest conditions, but it could do so under stress situations. Even if it is surgically more complex and time-consuming, this approach could be a good strategy to improve long-term results, particularly in young patients.

Two decades of valve-sparing root reimplantation in tricuspid aortic valve: impact of aortic regurgitation and cusp repair

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to analyse the influence of preoperative aortic regurgitation (AR) on the necessity of cusp repair during valve-sparing reimplantation (VSR). We focused on patients with tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) and evaluated the impact of AR and cusp repair on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

From March 1998 to December 2018, a total of 512 consecutive patients underwent VSR at our institution; of these, 303 had a TAV. The mean age was 53 ± 15 years, and the median follow-up was 6.12 years. The rate and type of cusp repair were analysed based on preoperative AR. Time-to-event analysis was performed, as well as risk of death, reoperation and AR recurrence.

RESULTS

Cusp repair was necessary in 168 (55.4%) patients; the rate rose significantly as AR grade increased (P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was 1% (n = 3). At 5 and 10 years, overall survival was 92 ± 2% and 75 ± 5%, respectively. Freedom from valve reoperation was 95 ± 2% and 90 ± 3%. Freedom from AR >2+ and AR >1+ at 10 years was 88 ± 4% and 70.4 ± 4.6%, respectively. Independent predictors of death included age, New York Heart Association functional class and type-A aortic dissection. Predictors of AR greater than mild included previous cardiac surgery and severe preoperative AR.

CONCLUSION

In patients with TAV receiving VSR, the necessity of cusp repair increased with the degree of preoperative AR. Preoperative AR and cusp repair do not impact long-term survival and aortic valve reoperation, but severe preoperative AR and multiple cusp repair increase the risk of recurrent moderate-to-severe AR. Overall, cusp repair seems to attenuate the negative impact of preoperative AR for at least 1 decade in a majority of patients.

Which Aortic Valve Can Be Surgically Reconstructed?

Purpose of Review

Preservation or repair of the aortic valve has evolved dynamically in the past 20 years. It leads to a high freedom from valve-related complications if an adequate valve durability can be achieved; it may possibly also improve survival. To date, little structured information is available about which valves can be repaired and which should better be replaced.

Recent Findings

For surgical decision-making, the size of the aortic root is important and the anatomy of the aortic valve must be considered. In the presence of root aneurysm, most tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves can be preserved. In aortic regurgitation and normal aortic dimensions, the majority of tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves can be repaired with good long-term durability. In bicuspid aortic valves, the morphologic characteristics must be taken into consideration. Unicuspid and quadricuspid aortic valves can be repaired in selected cases. Generally, cusp calcification is a sign of a poor substrate for repair; the same is true for cusp retraction and cusp destruction due to active endocarditis. They are associated with limited valve durability.

Summary

Using current concepts, many non-calcified aortic valves can be repaired. Modern imaging, in particular three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), should be able to define repairable aortic valves with a high probability.