Which patients should be operated on after induction chemotherapy for N2 non-small cell lung cancer? Analysis of a 7-year experience in 175 patients

Pathological response in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy are needed to provide earlier treatment outcome indicators and accelerate drug approval. This study's main objectives were to investigate the association among pathological complete response, major pathological response, event-free survival and overall survival and to determine whether treatment effects on pathological complete response and event-free survival correlate with treatment effects on overall survival.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted to identify neoadjuvant studies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Analysis at the patient level using frequentist and Bayesian random effects (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival or event-free survival by pathological complete response or major pathological response status, yes vs no) and at the trial level using weighted least squares regressions (hazard ratio for overall survival or event-free survival vs pathological complete response, by treatment arm) were performed.

RESULTS

In both meta-analyses, pathological complete response yielded favorable overall survival compared with no pathological complete response (frequentist, 20 studies and 6530 patients: HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval = 0.42 to 0.57; Bayesian, 19 studies and 5988 patients: HR = 0.48, 95% probability interval = 0.43 to 0.55) and similarly for major pathological response (frequentist, 12 studies and 1193 patients: HR = 0.36, 95% confidence interval = 0.29 to 0.44; Bayesian, 11 studies and 1018 patients: HR = 0.33, 95% probability interval = 0.26 to 0.42). Across subgroups, estimates consistently showed better overall survival or event-free survival in pathological complete response or major pathological response compared with no pathological complete response or no major pathological response. Trial-level analyses showed a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival hazard ratios (R2 = 0.7159) but did not show a correlation between treatment effects on pathological complete response and overall survival or event-free survival.

CONCLUSION

There was a strong and consistent association between pathological response and survival and a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

A Review of the Current Approach and Treatment Landscape for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The therapeutic landscape of the management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has drastically evolved with the incorporation of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Stage III NSCLC accounts for one-third of the cases and the treatment strategy of these locally advanced presentations are diverse, ranging from surgical to non-surgical options; with the incorporation of chemo-immunotherapy, radiation, and targeted therapies wherever applicable. The staging of this disease has also changed, and it is essential to have a strong multidisciplinary approach to do justice to patient care. In this article, we aim to navigate the nuanced approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of stage III NSCLC and expand on the evolution of the management of this disease.

Select octogenarians with stage IIIa non–small cell lung cancer can benefit from trimodality therapy

Objectives

Currently, more than 36% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer are 75 years of age or older. Management of stage IIIA cancer is variable, especially for octogenarians who might not be offered surgery because of questionable benefit. In this study we investigated the outcomes of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CR) and trimodality therapy (TM) management (CR and surgery) for clinical stage IIIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients 80 years of age or older.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for stage IIIA NSCLC in patients 80 years of age or older between 2004 and 2015. Patients were divided according to treatment type: definitive CR and TM. Patient demographic characteristics, facility type, Charlson–Deyo score, final tumor pathology, and survival data were extracted. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by 3:1 propensity matching to analyze overall survival differences. Unadjusted and adjusted Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed.

Results

From the database, 6048 CR and 190 TM octogenarians were identified. Patients in the TM group were younger (82 years old [TM] vs 83 years old [CR]; P < .0001), more likely to be treated at an academic/research institution (36% [TM] vs 26% [CR]; P = .003), had greater proportion of adenocarcinoma (52% [TM] vs 34% [CR]; P < .001), and a smaller tumor size (38 mm [TM] vs 33 mm [CR]; P = .025). After 3:1 matching, the 5-year overall survival for the TM group was 29% (95% CI, 22%-38%) versus 15% (95% CI, 11%-20%) for the CR group.

Conclusions

Selected elderly patients with stage IIIa NSCLC can benefit from an aggressive TM approach.

Risk factors for pulmonary complications after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

Background

We aimed to investigate the characteristics and pretreatment risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRTx) in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of 122 patients who underwent curative resection after neoadjuvant CRTx for NSCLC between 2007 and December 2019. Clinical data, including pulmonary function and body mass index (BMI) at the time of concurrent CRTx initiation, were analyzed. We performed logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors for PPCs and built a nomogram with significant factors.

Results

Of the 122 patients included (mean age, 60.1 ± 9.7 years; 69.7% male), 27 experienced PPCs (severity grade ≥ 2). The most common PPCs were pneumonia (n = 17). Patients with PPCs had a significantly longer hospital stay (median 6.0 vs. 17 days, p < 0.001) and a higher in‐hospital mortality rate (1.1% vs. 29.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, lower BMI (odds ratio [OR] 0.796, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.628–0.987, p = 0.038), no comorbidity (OR 0.220, 95% CI: 0.059–0.819, p = 0.048), smoking history (OR 4.362, 95% CI: 1.210–15.720, p = 0.024), and %predicted DLCO <60% (OR 3.727, 95% CI: 1.319–10.530, p = 0.013) were independent risk factors for PPCs. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram built with factors was excellent (concordance index: 0.756).

Conclusions

The nomogram constructed with factors identified in multivariable analysis could serve as a reliable tool for evaluating the risk of PPCs in the patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRTx for NSCLC.

Surgical or medical strategy for locally-advanced, stage IIIA/B-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: Reproducibility of decision-making at a multidisciplinary tumor board

BACKGROUND

Stage IIIA/B-N2 is a very heterogeneous group of patients and accounts for one third of NSCLC at diagnosis. The best treatment strategy is established at a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB): surgical resection with neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy versus definitive chemoradiation with immune checkpoint inhibitors consolidation. Despite the crucial role of MTBs in this complex setting, limited data is available regarding its performances and the reproducibility of the decision-making.

METHODS

Using a large cohort of IIIA/B-N2 NSCLC patients, we described patient's characteristics and treatment strategies established at the initial MTB: with a "surgical strategy" group, for potentially resectable disease, and a "medical strategy" group for non-resectable patients. A third group consisted of patients who were not eligible for surgery after neoadjuvant treatment and switched from the surgical to the medical strategy. We randomly selected 30 cases (10 in each of the 3 groups) for a blinded re-discussion at a fictive MTB and analyzed the reproducibility and factors associated with treatment decision.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven IIIA/B-N2 NSCLC patients were enrolled between June 2017 and December 2019. The initial MTB opted for a medical or a surgical strategy in 44% and 56% of patients respectively. We identified histology, tumor size and localization, extent of lymph node involvement and the presence of bulky mediastinal nodes as key decision-making factors. Thirteen patients were not eligible for surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy and switched for a medical strategy. Overall concordance between the initial decision and the re-discussion was 70%. The kappa correlation coefficient was 0.43. Concordance was higher for patients with limited mediastinal node invasion. Survival did not appear to be impacted by conflicting decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of treatment decision-making for stage IIIA/B-N2 NSCLC patients at a MTB is moderate but does not impact survival.

Major pathologic response assessment and clinical significance of metastatic lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

For neoadjuvant therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, the major pathologic response of primary tumors may be an assessable and reliable surrogate measure of survival. Few studies have examined the pathologic evaluation of metastatic lymph node responses and their prognostic significance. This retrospective study enrolled 336 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, n = 216; adenocarcinoma, n = 120) treated with neoadjuvant therapy including chemotherapy (n = 316) and targeted therapy (adenocarcinoma, n = 20). The treatment response of the primary tumor and lymph node metastases (LNM) were pathologically assessed according to the multidisciplinary recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. The relationship of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) with the responses of the primary tumor or LNM was analyzed. The optimal cutoff value of the residual viable tumor (%RVT) of the primary tumor was 12% for both OS (P < 0.001) and DFS (P < 0.001). The pathologic assessment identified LNM in 208 patients. The optimal %RVT cutoff value in LNM was 8% for both OS (P = 0.003) and DFS (P < 0.001). The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between primary tumors and corresponding LNM was 0.487 for %RVT (P < 0.001), which indicated a positive correlation. On multivariable analysis, an RVT of the primary tumor ≤12% was an independent prognostic factor for improved OS (P = 0.024), whereas an RVT of LNM ≤ 8% was an independent prognostic factor for increased DFS (P = 0.018). Furthermore, in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, the optimal %RVT cutoff values for OS in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in the primary tumor were 12% and 58%, respectively. Considering its convenience and operability in clinical application, a 10% threshold RVT value can be used for prognostic evaluation of LNM and primary tumors of squamous cell carcinoma histology; further studies are needed to confirm the optimal cutoff value for primary tumors of adenocarcinoma.

Surgery for Locally Advanced and Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is a heterogeneous group of tumors that require multidisciplinary treatment. Although there is much debate with regard to their management, a multimodal treatment strategy for carefully selected patients that includes surgery can extend survival compared with nonoperative definitive therapy. As the role of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors for these tumors becomes better defined, practices will continue to evolve.

Significantly favourable outcome for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer stage IIIA/IIIB and single-station persistent N2 (skip or additionally N1) disease after multimodality treatment

OBJECTIVES

Persistent lymph nodes infiltration after neoadjuvant treatment remains a controversial topic in the treatment of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to identify subgroups with persistent N2 disease, who could experience survival benefit from the addition of surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-institutional study was conducted to analyse all patients with a final histopathology of NSCLC and persistent mediastinal disease after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery from January 1998 to June 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients (93 men, 52 women) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median age was 60 years (range 38-78). A total of 82 (56.5%) patients received a lobectomy, 48 (33.1%) a pneumonectomy, 11 (7.6%) a bilobectomy and 4 (2.6%) an anatomical segmentectomy; 128 (88.3%) were completely resected (R0). Operative mortality was 2.6% (4 patients), and morbidity was 35.2% (51 patients). Overall survival at 5 years was 47.3% (n = 19) for single N2 (skip), 30.2% (n = 16) for single N2 and N1 lymph nodes and under 5% (n = 1) for multiple mediastinal stations disease. Overall survival at 5 years after lobectomy/bilobectomy was not statistically different than after pneumonectomy (33.5% vs 20.5%, P = 0.082). Disease-free survival at 5 years was 30.6% (n = 6) for ypN2a1, 23.4% (n = 7) for ypN2a2 and under 5% (n = 1) for ypN2b status.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobectomy or bilobectomy has to be taken into account as a potentially curative option with promising long-term results for patients after induction treatment and persistent single-station N2 involvement (skip or additionally N1 status).

TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

14-6138-BO.

A prognostic score for non-small cell lung cancer resected after neoadjuvant therapy in comparison with the tumor-node-metastases classification and major pathological response

Studies validating the prognostic accuracy of the tumor-node-metastases (TNM) classification in patients with lung cancer treated by neoadjuvant therapy are scarce. Tumor regression, particularly major pathological response (MPR), is an acknowledged prognostic factor in this setting. We aimed to validate a novel combined prognostic score. This retrospective single-center study was conducted on 117 consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer resected after neoadjuvant treatment at a Swiss University Cancer Center between 2000 and 2016. All cases were clinicopathologically re-evaluated. We assessed the prognostic performance of a novel prognostic score (PRSC) combining T-category, lymph node status, and MPR, in comparison with the eighth edition of the TNM classification (TNM8), the size adapted TNM8 as proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) and MPR alone. The isolated ypT-category and the combined TNM8 stages accurately differentiated overall survival (OS, stage p = 0.004) and disease-free survival (DFS, stage p = 0.018). Tumor regression had a prognostic impact. Optimal cut-offs for MPR emerged as 65% for adenocarcinoma and 10% for non-adenocarcinoma and were statistically significant for survival (OS p = 0.006, DFS p < 0.001). The PRSC differentiated between three prognostic groups (OS and DFS p < 0.001), and was superior compared to the stratification using MPR alone or the TNM8 systems, visualized by lower Akaike (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) values. In the multivariate analyses, stage III tumors (HR 4.956, p = 0.003), tumors without MPR (HR 2.432, p = 0.015), and PRSC high-risk tumors (HR 5.692, p < 0.001) had significantly increased risks of occurring death. In conclusion, we support 65% as the optimal cut-off for MPR in adenocarcinomas. TNM8 and MPR were comparable regarding their prognostic significance. The novel prognostic score performed distinctly better regarding OS and DFS.

Advances in the Treatment of Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) traditionally has involved combinations of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical resection. Although the multimodality approach remains standard, only a fraction of patients with stage III lung cancer can undergo complete resection, and long-term prognosis remains poor. The PACIFIC trial generated significant enthusiasm when it demonstrated that the programmed death ligand-1 inhibitor, durvalumab, improved survival in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC after completion of definitive concurrent chemoradiation. This article reviews the indications for traditional therapies in stage III NSCLC and highlights ongoing advances that have led to the incorporation of novel therapeutic agents.

Pan-Tumor Pathologic Scoring of Response to PD-(L)1 Blockade

PURPOSE

Pathologic response assessment of tumor specimens from patients receiving systemic treatment provides an early indication of therapeutic efficacy and predicts long-term survival. Grading systems for pathologic response were first developed for chemotherapy in select tumor types. Immunotherapeutic agents have a mechanism of action distinct from chemotherapy and are being used across a broad array of tumor types. A standardized, universal scoring system for pathologic response that encompasses features characteristic for immunotherapy and spans tumor types is needed.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from neoadjuvant surgical resections and on-treatment biopsies were assessed for features of immune-related pathologic response (irPR). A total of 258 specimens from patients with 11 tumor types as part of ongoing clinical trials for anti-PD-(L)1 were evaluated. An additional 98 specimens from patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 in combination with other treatments were also reviewed, including those from three additional tumor types.

RESULTS

Common irPR features (immune activation, cell death, tissue repair, and regression bed) were present in all tumor types reviewed, including melanoma, non-small cell lung, head and neck squamous cell, Merkel cell, and renal cell carcinoma, among others. Features were consistent across primary tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastases. Specimens from patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 in combination with another agent also exhibited irPR features.

CONCLUSIONS

irPR features are consistent across tumor types and treatment settings. Standardized, pan-tumor irPR criteria (irPRC) are defined and associated specimen-handling considerations are described. Future, prospective studies are merited to validate irPRC in larger datasets and to associate pathologic features with long-term patient outcomes.

Efficacy of erlotinib as neoadjuvant regimen in EGFR-mutant locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

The optimal neoadjuvant regimen for locally advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. EGFR inhibitors have significantly improved survival in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. However, their efficacy in neoadjuvant settings, particularly for treating locally advanced NSCLC, remains unclear. We compared the clinical benefits of chemotherapy and erlotinib as neoadjuvant therapy for stage IIIA NSCLC.

Method

Thirty-one treatment-naïve Chinese patients with stage IIIA NSCLC were enrolled. Patients without EGFR mutation received cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy (n = 16; N-chemo group) while EGFR-mutant patients received erlotinib (n = 15; N-TKI group) as neoadjuvant therapy.

Results

After completing neoadjuvant treatment, 12 and 8 patients from the N-TKI and N-chemo groups underwent surgery, respectively. Our data revealed that patients who received erlotinib had a marginally better clinical objective response rate (67% vs. 19%), pathological response rate (67% vs. 38%), and overall survival (51.0 months vs. 20.9 months) compared with those who received chemotherapy. Furthermore, patients in the N-TKI group had a significantly greater reduction in tumor diameter, serum carcinoembryonic level, and maximum allelic fraction.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that erlotinib is an effective neoadjuvant regimen in patients with EGFR-mutant locally advanced NSCLC, paving the way for its extended use in neoadjuvant settings.

[ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01217619]

Salvage surgery after definitive chemo-radiotherapy for patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite all treatment advances, lung cancer is still the main cause of death worldwide. Treatment for resectable stage IIIA remains controversial including definitive chemoradiotherapy and induction treatment followed by surgery. After definitive chemoradiation up to 35% of patients will relapse locally. Experience with salvage resection after definitive chemoradiotherapy in lung cancer is limited. We present our experience in 27 patients who underwent surgical resection after definitive treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2016, 27 patients were evaluated in our department for surgical resection after receiving definitive chemoradiation treatment in different institutions. We conducted a retrospective study gathering the following data: age, gender, clinical and pathologic stage, histology, chemotherapy treatment regimen, radiotherapy dosage, surgical procedure and complications. Time between surgical resection and last follow-up was used to calculate Overall Survival (OS). Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was calculated from surgical resection to diagnosis of relapse.

RESULTS

Most of the patients were men with a median age of 56.09 years. Median follow-up time was 46.94 months. All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and high-dose radiotherapy, except for one patient who received 45 Gy. Lobectomy and bilobectomy was performed in 7 patients each, and pneumonectomy in 13. Complications appeared in 5 patients. Bronchopleural fistula appeared in two patients, and only one death in the early postoperative period. The analysis showed an OS of 75.56 months, with 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival of 74.1%, 57.8% and 53.3% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Salvage surgery in selected patients is technically feasible, with low morbidity and mortality rates and good long-term outcomes.

Reconstruction of Long Noncircumferential Tracheal or Carinal Resections With Bronchial Flaps

BACKGROUND

Removal of tumors that invade the trachea or carina often results in a massive defect that exceeds the limits of end-to-end anastomosis. The purpose of this study is to discuss the clinical value of bronchial flap for the closure of central airway defects after noncircumferential tracheal or carinal resection.

METHODS

From 1990 to 2016, 73 patients underwent noncircumferential tracheal or carinal resection. From size, location, and pulmonary function, there were six different types of bronchial flap reconstruction.

RESULTS

We performed bronchial flap upturned reconstruction with right pneumonectomy (n = 45), right upper lobectomy (n = 9), left pneumonectomy (n = 7), left upper lobectomy (n = 3), and bronchial flap downturned reconstruction with right pneumonectomy (n = 5), left pneumonectomy (n = 4). The size of airway defects that were replaced by bronchial flap ranged from 0.5 × 2 to 2.5 × 7 cm and was at most 50% of the airway circumference. Postoperative major complications occurred in 17.8% (13 of 73) of patients: four bronchopleural fistulas (5.5%), five serious postoperative infections (6.8%), two pulmonary atelectasis (2.7%), and two airway stenosis (2.7%). However, no significant differences were found in postoperative complications between resection lengths shorter than 4 cm and longer than 4 cm (p = 0.295). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 2.7%. The overall survival rate was 63.5% and 23.6% at 2 and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The six different types of bronchial flap reconstruction present an efficient therapeutic strategy to close massive central airway defects after noncircumferential tracheal or carinal resection when the patient has poor pulmonary function or when an end-to-end anastomosis is unfeasible and risky.

Pathologic Assessment After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for NSCLC: Importance and Implications of Distinguishing Adenocarcinoma From Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Major pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for NSCLC has been defined as 10% or less residual viable tumor without distinguishing between histologic types. We sought to investigate whether the optimal cutoff percentage of residual viable tumor for predicting survival differs between lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

Tumor slides from 272 patients treated with NAC and surgery for clinical stage II-III NSCLC (ADC, n = 192; SCC, n = 80) were reviewed. The optimal cutoff percentage of viable tumor for predicting lung cancer-specific cumulative incidence of death (LC-CID) was determined using maximally selected rank statistics. LC-CID was analyzed using a competing-risks approach. Overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with SCC had a better response to NAC (median percentage of viable tumor: SCC versus ADC, 40% versus 60%; p = 0.027). Major pathologic response (≤10% viable tumor) was observed in 26% of SCC cases versus 12% of ADC cases (p = 0.004). The optimal cutoff percentage of viable tumor for LC-CID was 10% for SCC and 65% for ADC. On multivariable analysis, viable tumor 10% or less was an independent factor for better LC-CID (p = 0.035) in patients with SCC; in patients with ADC, viable tumor 65% or less was a factor for better LC-CID (p = 0.033) and overall survival (p = 0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

In response to NAC, the optimal cutoff percentage of viable tumor for predicting survival differs between ADC and SCC. Our findings have implications for the pathologic assessment of resected specimens, especially in upcoming clinical trials design.

PLNR≤20% may be a benefit from PORT for patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC: a large population-based study

Purpose

Our study was to evaluate the influence of positive lymph nodes ratio (PLNR) on survival for patients with pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after receiving postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).

Patients and methods

The chi-squared test was used to compare the patient baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the influence of different variables on overall survival (OS). X-tile model was applied to determine the cutoff values of PLNR. Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare survival differences. Based on different cutoff values of PLNR, Cox proportional hazard model was also used to analyze the influence factors on OS.

Results

Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that PLNR (P=0.001) and PORT (HR=1.283; 95% CI 1.154–1.426; P<0.001) were significant independent prognostic factors for OS in patients with resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC. The X-tile model was used to screen three different cutoff values including PLNR≤20%, 20%<PLNR≤40%, PLNR>40%. Based on these different cutoff values, we found that patients with PLNR≤20% receiving PORT have a better OS (P=0.007). Further multivariable analysis showed that PORT is an independent prognostic factor of OS only for patients with PLNR≤20% (HR=1.328; 95% CI 1.139–1.549; P<0.001). Conclusion: PLNR≤20% may be a prognostic factor for patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC receiving PORT.

Role of pneumonectomy for lung cancer in current scenario: An Indian perspective

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment for lung cancer has evolved from pneumonectomy to lobectomy/sleeve resection around the world. Although condemned for poor outcomes, pneumonectomy may still be required in a select group of patients in developing countries. With the better patient selection, optimization of medical comorbidities, better perioperative care; pneumonectomy may show better results. Thus, there is a need to reconsider the role of pneumonectomy in patients with locally advanced lung cancer in the current scenario.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The aim of this study was to analyze the demographic and clinicopathologic profile of lung cancer patients and the role of pneumonectomy at a tertiary cancer center in India. The records of patients, who underwent surgery for lung cancer at our institute from January 2011 to April 2014, were analyzed retrospectively, and various parameters in pneumonectomy were compared to lobectomy patients.

RESULTS

Out of 48 patients undergoing major lung resections, nearly 80% patients were symptomatic at presentation and were mostly in advanced stages, thus requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 45.8% cases and pneumonectomy in 41.6% patients. There was no difference in morbidity and mortality in pneumonectomy (25%, 5%) versus lobectomy (21.2%, 3.5%). Disease-free survival at 1, 2, and 3 years after pneumonectomy (71.8%, 51.4%, and 42.8%) was comparable to lobectomy (73.3%, 66.1%, and 55.6%). After neoadjuvant therapy, survival was not affected by the type of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Indian scenario, as the majority of lung cancer patients present at an advanced stage, pneumonectomy still plays a major role, and the acceptable postoperative outcome can be achieved with aggressive perioperative management.

Prognosis of multi-level N2-positive non-small cell lung cancer according to lymph node staging using endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial biopsy

Background

The optimal treatment for stage IIIA‐N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial, and multidisciplinary team approaches are needed. Downstaging after induction therapy is a good prognostic factor in surgical patients; however, re‐evaluation of nodal status before surgery is challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of patients with multi‐level N2 NSCLC who received surgery or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) according to restaging using endobronchial ultrasound‐transbronchial aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA).

Methods

This was a single center, prospective study that included 16 patients with biopsy‐proven multi‐level N2 disease on initial EBUS‐TBNA that was restaged using EBUS‐TBNA after induction therapy. Cases downstaged after rebiopsy were treated surgically. Three‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and locoregional PFS were determined using Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

Of the 16 patients (median age 58 years, male 63%), eight had persistent N2 disease and eight showed N2 clearance on restaging using EBUS‐TBNA. Ten patients underwent surgery, including two patients without N2 clearance. Recurrence and locoregional recurrence occurred in eight and five patients, respectively. The three‐year PFS was longer in patients with N2 clearance than in those with N2 persistent disease (57.1% vs. 37.5%). Patients with N2 clearance also had longer three‐year locoregional PFS than those with N2 persistent disease (71.4% vs. 62.5%).

Conclusions

EBUS‐TBNA could be an effective diagnostic method for restaging in multi‐level N2 NSCLC patients after induction CRT. As this was a pilot study, further large‐scale randomized studies are needed.

Before or After: Evolving Neoadjuvant Approaches to Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most challenging and controversial areas of thoracic oncology. This heterogeneous group is characterized by varying tumor size and location, the potential for involvement of surrounding structures, and ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node spread. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, administered prior to definitive local therapy, has been found to improve survival in patients with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC. Concurrent chemoradiation has also been evaluated in phase III studies in efforts to improve control of locoregional disease. In certain instances, a tri-modality approach involving concurrent chemoradiation followed by surgery, may offer patients the best chance for cure. In this article, we provide an overview of the trials evaluating neoadjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC that have resulted in current practice strategies, and we highlight the areas of uncertainty in the management of this challenging disease. We also review the current ongoing research and future directions in the management of stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC.

Perioperative outcomes and lymph node assessment after induction therapy in patients with clinical N1 or N2 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy has been shown to benefit patients with resectable stage-2 or stage-3 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to determine if induction chemotherapy (CTx) with or without radiation therapy (± RT) for NSCLC with clinical lymph node (LN) involvement (cN1 or cN2) affects LN dissection or perioperative outcomes during robotic-assisted video thoracoscopic (RAVTS) lobectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent RAVTS lobectomy for NSCLC over 45 months. We assessed clinical LN status by CT scan, PET scan, endobronchial ultrasound, and/or mediastinoscopy. We grouped patients with cN1 or cN2 as: "no induction therapy", "induction CTx alone" (ICTx), or "induction CTx + RT" (ICTx + RT). Intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), operative times, tumor size, LN status, and restaging were noted.

RESULTS

Of 256 NSCLC patients who had lobectomy, there were 52 cN1 or cN2 patients, of whom 39 patients had "no induction", 7 had ICTx, and 6 had ICTx + RT. Higher rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, tracheal/bronchial injury, and pulmonary embolism were observed with ICTx ± RT (P=0.02, 0.04, and 0.02, respectively). Total number of complications was not significantly different, nor were perioperative outcomes, such as EBL, operative time, and in-hospital mortality. Fewer N2 LN stations were assessed after ICTx ± RT (3.7±0.2 vs. 4.2±0.2 stations; P=0.04), but total number of LNs reported were not significantly different (13.0±2.3 vs. 16.2±1.0 LNs, P=0.22). Of "no induction" patients, 15.4% were upstaged pathologically; no patients were upstaged after induction therapy. While 30.8% of ICTx ± RT patients were downstaged, 38.5% of "no induction" patients were also downstaged on final pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction CTx ± RT for cN1 or cN2 NSCLC patients did not affect EBL, operative times, or in-house mortality after RAVTS lobectomy. Patients undergoing RAVTS lobectomy after ICTx+ RT may be at greater risk for RLN injury, tracheal/bronchial injury, and pulmonary embolism. Fewer N2 LN stations, but not numbers of LNs, are assessed after ICTx ± RT. Induction therapy does not lead to increased downstaging.

Effectiveness of a thoracic multidisciplinary clinic in the treatment of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction

The Institute of Medicine, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the European Society of Medical Oncology promote a multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of cancer. Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a heterogeneous group of diseases necessitating coordination of care among medical, radiation, and surgical oncology. The optimal care of stage III NSCLC underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach.

Methods

From tumor registry data, we identified all cases of stage III NSCLC seen at Lehigh Valley Health Network between March 2010 and March 2013. The care received by patients when seen in the thoracic multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) was compared with the care received when not seen in the thoracic MDC.

Results

All patients seen in the MDC, compared to <50% of patients seen outside the MDC, were evaluated by more than one physician prior to beginning the treatment. Time to initiate treatment was shorter in MDC patients than in non-MDC patients. Patients seen in the MDC had a greater concordance with clinical pathways. A greater percentage of patients seen in the thoracic MDC had pathologic staging of their mediastinum. Patients seen in the MDC were more likely to receive all of their care at Lehigh Valley Health Network.

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary care is essential in the treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC. Greater utilization of MDCs for this complex group of patients will result in more efficient coordination of care, pretreatment evaluation, and therapy, which in turn should translate to improve patients’ outcomes.

Long-term survival following open versus thoracoscopic lobectomy after preoperative chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy is increasingly accepted for the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its role for locally advanced cancers has not been as well characterized. We compared outcomes of patients who received induction therapy followed by lobectomy, via VATS or thoracotomy.

METHODS

Perioperative complications and long-term survival of all patients with NSCLC who received induction chemotherapy (ICT) (with or without induction radiation therapy) followed by lobectomy from 1996-2012 were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis. Propensity score-matched comparisons were used to assess the potential impact of selection bias.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 2012, 272 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent lobectomy after ICT: 69 (25%) by VATS and 203 (75%) by thoracotomy. An 'intent-to-treat' analysis was performed. Compared with thoracotomy patients, VATS patients had a higher clinical stage, were older, had greater body mass index, and were more likely to have coronary disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Induction radiation was used more commonly in thoracotomy patients [VATS 28% (n = 19) vs open 72% (n = 146), P < 0.001]. Thirty-day mortality was similar between the VATS [3% (n = 2)] and open [4% (n = 8)] groups (P = 0.69). Seven (10%) of the VATS cases were converted to thoracotomy due to difficulty in dissection from fibrotic tissue and adhesions (n = 5) or bleeding (n = 2); none of these conversions led to perioperative deaths. In univariate analysis, VATS patients had improved 3-year survival compared with thoracotomy (61% vs 43%, P = 0.010). In multivariable analysis, the VATS approach showed a trend towards improved survival, but this did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-1.01; P = 0.053). Moreover, a propensity score-matched analysis balancing patient characteristics demonstrated that the VATS approach had similar survival to an open approach (P = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

VATS lobectomy in patients treated with induction therapy for locally advanced NSCLC is feasible and effective and does not appear to compromise oncologic outcomes.

Outcome of Patients With pN2 "Potentially Resectable" Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Who Underwent Surgery After Induction Chemotherapy

Patients with stage IIIA-ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represent a heterogeneous group with different clinical presentation. The aim of this study was to analyze a series of patients with "potentially resectable" stage IIIA-pathologically proven N2 (pN2) NSCLC undergoing induction chemotherapy followed by surgery to evaluate their long-term outcomes and to identify prognostic factors. Out of 287 patients who underwent induction chemotherapy for NSCLC with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement pathologically proven, we retrospectively evaluated 141 (49%) patients with no clinical evidence of progression after induction chemotherapy and candidates for surgery. Most of them (73%) underwent at least 3 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to plot survival and the log-rank test to assess the survival difference between groups. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 15 (10.6%) patients underwent explorative thoracotomy; 126 patients underwent surgical anatomical resection after a median 27 days (range: 21-30) from the last cycle of chemotherapy. A total of 113 (89.7%) patients had a radical resection. A total of 22 (17.5%) patients had a complete pathologic lymph node downstaging (pN0), and 8 (6.3%) patients had a complete pathological response (pT0N0). The median overall survival was 24 months, with a 5-year overall survival of 30%. At multivariable analysis, downstaging and number of cycles of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors (P = 0.006); downstaging benefit was mostly because of complete pathological response (hazards ratio = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.76). In conclusion, more than 3 cycles of chemotherapy and pathological downstaging could significantly improve 5-year survival in selected patients with "potentially resectable" pathologically proven N2 disease.

Which is the Role of Pneumonectomy in the Era of Parenchymal-Sparing Procedures? Early/Long-Term Survival and Functional Results of a Single-Center Experience

AIM

Despite the increasing adoption of parenchymal-sparing procedures, pneumonectomy is still necessary in several pleural and pulmonary (benign or malignant) diseases. We reviewed clinical data of a large cohort of patients treated by pneumonectomy with the aim of better define its impact on early and long-term results.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological characteristics of all consecutive patients treated by pneumonectomy between January 2005 and May 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty- and 90-day mortality, as well as long-term survival was assessed. Factors associated to long-term survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Evaluation of quality of life was carried out by a standard questionnaire (SF-12) administrated by phone to patients surviving beyond 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 398 patients (293 men; mean age 61 ± 10.9 years) were operated on in the study period. Indication was malignancy in 380 patients (350 primary lung cancers). Thirty-day mortality was 9 % (right: 12.6 % vs. left: 6.3 %, p = 0.013), significantly correlating with age (p = 0.021), comorbidities (p = 0.034), PS > 1 (p = 0.018), preoperative dyspnea (p = 0.0013), and FEV1 (p = 0.0071). Overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 76.6, 46.6, 34.4, and 29.2 %. In case of primary lung cancer, these figures were 76.8, 46.4, 34.5, and 29.7 %. At univariate analysis, a less favorable survival was associated to PS > 1 (p = 0.0078), right side (p = 0.044), occurrence of postoperative complications (p = 0.00079), and T3-4 status (p = 0.013). At multivariate analysis, PS > 1, right side, and occurrence of postoperative complications were identified as independent worse prognostic factors. SF12 physical score was 39.1 ± 9.0 and was correlated to the presence of preoperative symptoms (p = 0.013). Mental score was 50.68 ± 9.63 and was correlated to preoperative FEV1/FVC ratio (p = 0.023) and side of disease (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

In current practice, pneumonectomy is still performed for malignancy, sometimes after induction treatment. High postoperative morbidity and mortality are observed; however, at a farer interval time point, long-term survival with preserved quality of life can be observed.

Evolution of induction chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer over the last 30 years: A surgical appraisal

BACKGROUND

Induction chemotherapy (ICT) is supposed to reduce the risk of micrometastatic progression and improve resectability of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, best indications for ICT strategy remain unclear in published meta-analyses. Based on this observation, an evaluation of daily practice is of importance. Therefore, we reviewed indications and efficacy time trends in our 30-year series.

METHODS

A database including all patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection in two French centers from 1980 to 2009 (n = 5563) was prospectively set and retrospectively reviewed. The indications, clinical and pathologic response rates, and overall survival of ICT patients (n = 732) were analyzed during three successive time-periods: P1 from 1980 to 1989, P2 from 1990 to 1999, and P3 from 2000 to 2009.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients who benefited from ICT increased over time, from 2.8% (n = 35) in P1 to 12.5% (n = 274) in P2, and 20.2% (n = 423) in P3. Indications evolved over time with more N2 patients (n = 211; 49.8%) and less initially unresectable patients (n = 72; 17%) in P3. The clinical response rate between P1 and P2 increased. Five and 10-year survival rates of ICT patients were 35.2% and 21.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, time-period, age, type of resection, histology, and pathologic response to chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our report on the off-trial use of induction therapy during the last 30 years demonstrates an increased use of ICT, a progressive focus on N2 disease, and improved response rates.

The Latest in Surgical Management of Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Tumor Molecular Profiling

Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a treatment challenge and requires a multidisciplinary care team to optimize survival outcomes. Thoracic surgeons play an important role in selecting operative candidates and assisting with pathologic mediastinal staging via cervical mediastinoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound, or esophageal ultrasound with fine needle aspiration. The majority of patients with stage IIIA disease will receive induction therapy followed by repeat staging before undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy; occasionally, a patient with an incidentally found, single-station microscopic IIIA tumor will undergo resection as the primary initial therapy. Multiple large clinical trials, including SWOG-8805, EORTC-8941, INT-0139, and ANITA, have shown 5-year overall survival rates of up to 30% to 40% using triple-modality treatments, and the best outcomes repeatedly are seen among patients who respond to induction treatment or who have tumors amenable to lobectomy instead of pneumonectomy. The need for a pneumonectomy is not a reason to deny patients an operation, because current operative mortality and morbidity rates are acceptably low at 5% and 30%, respectively. In select patients with stage IIIA disease, video-assisted thoracic surgery and open resections have been shown to have comparable rates of local recurrence and long-term survival. New developments in genetic profiling and personalized medicine are exciting areas of research, and early data suggest that molecular profiling of stage IIIA NSCLC tumors can accurately stratify patients by risk within this stage and predict survival outcomes. Future advances in treating stage IIIA disease will involve developing better systemic therapies and customizing treatment plans on the basis of an individual tumor's genetic profile.

Mediastinal downstaging after induction treatment is not a significant prognostic factor to select patients who would benefit from surgery: the clinical value of the lymph node ratio

OBJECTIVES

Multimodal management of N2 non-small-cell lung cancer is still a matter of debate. In particular, the place of surgery for persistent N2 after induction treatment is controversial and surgery is usually reserved for patients experiencing a mediastinal downstaging (pN1 and pN0). We aimed to evaluate whether there might exist subgroups of pN2 according to the lymph node ratio (LNR).

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2012, we retrospectively reviewed the data from 152 potentially resectable cN2 patients who underwent an induction treatment before surgery.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 32 months (2-112). The average age at the time of diagnosis was 58.52 ± 10.47 years. In univariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was significantly influenced by extracapsular spread (32 ± 5.33 vs 24 ± 12.73 months, P = 0.01), pN after surgery (65 ± 2.45 months for pN0, 44 ± 2.14 months for pN1 and 19 ± 1.72 months for pN2, P <0.0001) and LNR ≥ 1/3 (30 ± 3.77 months vs 16 ± 1.39 months, P <0.0001). When pN0 and pN1 patients were staged according to the LNR, the OS was divided by two for pN1 patients with an LNR ≥ 1/3 (48 ± 2.64 months vs 26 ± 5.65 months, P <0.001), whereas it decreased from 26 ± 0.87 to 15 ± 1.85 months (P <0.0001) for pN2 patients. OS was significantly better with adjuvant radio-chemotherapy than with chemotherapy or radiation therapy alone (P <0.0001). In multivariate analysis, mediastinal downstaging {Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.184 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.084-0.403), P <0.0001} and LNR [HR: 0.359 (95% CI: 0.194-0.665], P = 0.001) remained significantly independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The LNR may potentially identify subgroups of pN+ patients and allow enhancement of adjuvant treatments. Because pN2 with a low LNR had an equivalent survival to pN1 with a high LNR, mediastinal downstaging does not seem to be a sufficient prognostic factor to exclude patients after induction treatment from surgery.

Predictive factors for survival in stage IIIA N2 NSCLC patients treated with neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of imaging, surgical, histopathologic and patient-related factors on the risks of recurrence and overall survival (OS) in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing definitive resection after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 104 consecutive patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC who received neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery between 2008 and 2011. While reviewing the clinical and surgical data, we also assessed histopathologic and imaging (CT and PET/CT) factors. Disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were estimated with predictors for recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

The 3-year OS for patients with and without recurrence was 37.1 and 63.3 %, respectively (p < 0.001). Size decrease of target lesion(s) ≥36 % on post-neoadjuvant CCRT CT (p = 0.048) and viable tumor size on surgical specimen <9.4 mm (p = 0.035) were related to longer OS. Regarding shorter DFS, tumor size on post-neoadjuvant CCRT CT (p = 0.046), SUV(max) of the primary tumor (p = 0.011), male gender (p = 0.023), total tumor size on surgical specimen (p = 0.041) and viable tumor size on surgical specimen (p = 0.043) were the significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

OS is prolonged with greater extent of size decrease of target lesion(s) on post-neoadjuvant CCRT CT and smaller viable tumor size on surgical specimen. Larger tumor size on post-neoadjuvant CCRT CT, higher SUV(max), male gender, larger total tumor size and larger viable tumor size on surgical specimen may herald the higher probability of recurrence and the necessity of more attention.

Phase II study of perioperative chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed in non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in many solid tumors. We evaluated pCR rate of cisplatin with pemetrexed in non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with stages IB to IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 were enrolled in this single-arm phase II trial using two-stage design with 90% power to detect pCR rate of more than or equal to 10%. Pretreatment mediastinal lymph node biopsy was required. Patients received three cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m with pemetrexed 500 mg/m (day 1 every 21 days) preoperatively and additional two cycles within 60 to 80 days after surgery. The primary end point was pCR. Polymorphisms in FPGS, GGH, SLC19A1, and TYMS genes were correlated with treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled, with median age of 62.5 years. Preoperatively, 26% had squamous histology, and 34% had biopsy-proven N2 involvement. R0 resection was achieved in 94% of the 34 patients who underwent surgery, and 54% had documented N2 clearance. There was no pCR seen. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival of these patients have not yet been reached in contrast to median of 13.8 and 24.2 months, respectively, in patients with persistent N2 disease (p = 0.3241 and p = 0.1022, respectively). There was a statistically significant association between DFS and postoperative tumor, node, metastasis stage (p = 0.0429), SLC19A1 rs3788189 TT genotype (p = 0.0821), and viable tumor defined as less than or equal to 10% of resected specimen (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

The primary end point was not met. Patients with N2 clearance, less than or equal to 10% viable tumor in the resected specimen, and SLC19A1 rs3788189 TT genotype have favorable DFS outcomes.

Multimodality treatment with surgery for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with n2 disease: a review article

Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is composed of a heterogeneous population of lesions (ie, T4N0-3, T3N1-3, and T1a-2aN2-3), which makes it difficult to establish a definitive treatment strategy. Although several retrospective and prospective studies have been conducted to investigate the significance of multimodality treatments with surgery for patients with resectable stage III NSCLC, the role of surgery still remains controversial. In this article, we review the results of retrospective and prospective studies that have investigated the significance of multimodality treatment with surgery for patients with stage III NSCLC, particularly those with mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and the implications for the treatment of this controversial subset of patients.

Survivin mRNA Level in Blood Predict the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

In a previous study, survivin mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissue had been demonstrated to be associated with unfavorable prognosis of patients treated with chemotherapy. In this study, we investigated the survivin mRNA levels in blood of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC and their association with the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Blood specimens were collected from 56 patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC before (N0) and after the complete of NCT (N1). Survivin mRNA was measured by real-time quantitative-PCR assay. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was undertaken to determine the best cutoff value for survivin mRNA. Results showed that high blood survivin mRNA levels at N0 and N1 were significantly associated with clinical (P = 0.01 and P = 0.008, respectively) and pathologic response (both P = 0.004, respectively). Moreover, the change of blood survivin mRNA levels in these NSCLC patients is associated with the clinical and pathologic response to NCT. Patients with high survivin mRNA levels at N0 and N1 had significantly shorter DFS and OS than those with low survivin mRNA levels (P = 0.021 and P = 0.014, respectively for DFS; P = 0.009 and P = 0.005, respectively for OS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high blood survivin mRNA level was an independent predictor for worse DFS and OS in the NSCLC patients receiving NCT. In conclusion, survivin mRNA level in blood from stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients receiving NCT is predictive of cancer outcome.

Selective Pulmonary Artery Perfusion With Blood Flow Occlusion Delivers Concentrated Levels of Chemotherapy to Ipsilateral Hilar and Mediastinal Lymph Nodes

BACKGROUND

Although survival is historically low for patients presenting with N2 lung cancer, patients who respond to chemotherapy have up to a 30% chance for long term survival or cure. Selective pulmonary artery perfusion (SPAP) has been examined in several animal studies as a method for delivering chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer; however, there is a paucity of data regarding the effect of SPAP on regional lymph nodes.

METHODS

Left SPAP was performed using gemcitabine on five swine and compared with standard central venous infusion in controls. Samples were taken from lung, kidney, liver, plasma, and lymph nodes. Tissue was measured for gemcitabine concentration using mass spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Left SPAP resulted in significantly higher gemcitabine concentration than standard infusion in hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes while plasma gemcitabine concentration was not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

SPAP is a viable technique for concentrating a chemotherapeutic agent in the mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. This could potentially increase the response to chemotherapy and render more patients to be surgical candidates who present with N2 disease.

What outcome after the prescription of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lung cancer?

Background

The treatment of patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is controversial. Surgery remains the gold standard, even in this group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could allow surgical resection in patients initially judged inoperable.

Methods

From January 2009 to May 2010, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was indicated in 27 patients with NSCLC (25 men, 2 women). Their mean age was 65 years. The stages were: IIB in 5, IIIA in 17 (6 in stage IIIAN2), IIIB in 2, and IV in 3.

Results

23 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 2 refused induction treatment, and 2 had impaired status. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen was gemcitabine-cisplatin in 17 patients and vinorelbine-cisplatin in 6. Only 5 patients underwent complete surgical treatment after induction: 1 in stage IIB, 1 in stage IIIAN0, 1 in IIIB, and 2 in stage IV (1 operated brain metastasis, and 1 operated adrenal metastasis). Surgical treatment was not achieved after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 18 patients because of progressive disease.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy offers several potential benefits, but it may delay surgery or eliminate eligibility as a surgical candidate. Rigorous patient selection for this type of multimodal treatment is essential.

Histopathologic response criteria predict survival of patients with resected lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the ability of histopathologic response criteria to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Tissue specimens from 358 patients with NSCLC were evaluated by pathologists blinded to the patient treatment and outcome. The surgical specimens were reviewed for various histopathologic features in the tumor including percentage of residual viable tumor cells, necrosis, and fibrosis. The relationship between the histopathologic findings and OS was assessed.

RESULTS

The percentage of residual viable tumor cells and surgical pathologic stage were associated with OS and DFS in 192 patients with NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in multivariate analysis (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively). There was no association of OS or DFS with percentage of viable tumor cells in 166 patients with NSCLC who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.31 and p = 0.45, respectively). Long-term OS and DFS were significantly prolonged in patients who had ≤10% viable tumor compared with patients with >10% viable tumor cells (5 years OS, 85% versus 40%, p < 0.0001 and 5 years DFS, 78% versus 35%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The percentages of residual viable tumor cells predict OS and DFS in patients with resected NSCLC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy even when controlled for pathologic stage. Histopathologic assessment of resected specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy could potentially have a role in addition to pathologic stage in assessing prognosis, chemotherapy response, and the need for additional adjuvant therapies.

Surgery on unfavourable persistent N2/N3 non-small-cell lung cancer after trimodal therapy: do the results justify the risk?

OBJECTIVES

Persistent mediastinal lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy is a significant negative indicator for survival. Even though there is still no consensus on the matter, some authors advocate a thorough restaging prior to surgery and deny surgery in cases of persistent N2 because of the poor outcome. We analysed our results after trimodal therapy in pN2/N3 stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and persistent mediastinal lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 167 patients who received trimodal therapy for stage III NSCLC. Progression-free interval and survival were calculated. T-stage, N-stage, ypT-stage, ypN2/3-stage and surgical procedure were tested as risk factors.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients with potentially resectable initial pN2/3 underwent 44 pneumonectomies and 76% extended resections. Thirty-five patients showed persistent mediastinal lymph node metastasis after trimodal therapy. Treatment-related comorbidity after an operative therapy was 58%. Hospital mortality was 2.4%. The ypT- and ypN2/N3 stages were significant risk factors and, in the case of persistent mediastinal lymph node metastasis, median progression-free period was 17 months and median survival time was 21 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent but resectable N2/N3 after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC is the least favourable subgroup of patients in neoadjuvant approaches. If surgery can be carried out with curative intent and low morbidity, completing trimodal therapy is justified, with an acceptable outcome.

The multimodal management of locally advanced N2 non-small cell lung cancer: is there a role for surgical resection? A single institution's experience

BACKGROUND

The management of operable locally advanced N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a controversial topic. Concurrent chemoradiation (CT-RT) is considered the standard of care for inoperable or unresectable patients, but the role of trimodality treatment remains controversial. We present our institution's experience with the management of stage III (N2) NSCLC patients, analyzing whether the addition of surgery improves survival when compared with definitive CT-RT alone.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2006, 72 N2 NSCLC patients were treated. Thirty-four patients received cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy, followed by paclitaxel-cisplatin CT-RT, and 38 patients underwent surgery preceded by induction and/or followed by adjuvant therapy. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the differences were assessed with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Most of the patients (87 %) were men. The median age was 59 years. A statistically significant association between T3-T4c and definitive CT-RT as well as between T1-T2c and surgery was noted (p < 0.0001). After a median follow-up period of 35 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 42 months for the surgery group versus 41 months for the CT-RT patients (p = 0.590). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14 months after surgery and 25 months after CT-RT (p = 0.933). Responders to radical CT-RT had a better OS than non-responders (43 vs. 17 months, respectively, p = 0.011). No significant differences were found in the OS or PFS between the pN0 [14 (37.8 %) patients] and non-pN0 patients at thoracotomy. Three treatment-related deaths (7.8 %) were observed in the surgical cohort and none in the CT-RT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of surgery did not render a median OS or PFS benefit when compared with CT-RT alone in our series of stage III-N2 NSCLC patients, in accordance with previously published data. However, responses to CT-RT had a greater impact in terms of OS and PFS. Although the patients selected for management including surgery showed a favorable T clinical staging in comparison to patients exclusively treated with definitive CT-RT, similar survival outcomes were found.

Role of surgery following induction therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Over the last 30 years neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) followed by surgical resection for stage IIIB disease has significantly improved the overall results of treatment for patients with stage III NSCLC as well as for those with locally invasive tumors. Different chemotherapy regimens have been used, although in most studies some combination of drugs that include cisplatin is the standard. Radiation when given as part of the induction protocol appears to offer a higher rate of resection and complete resection, and higher doses of radiation are associated with better nodal downstaging. Resection in patients with persistent N2 disease and pneumonectomy following induction therapy remain controversial. Resection in patients with persistent N2 disease and pneumonectomy following induction therapy remain controversial.

Multidisciplinary approach in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: standard of care and open questions

Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer death worldwide and its global incidence has been steadily increasing during recent decades. A third of patients with newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with locally advanced disease. There is not a single widely accepted standard of care for these patients because of the wide spectrum of presentation of the disease. Although feasible and safe in experienced hands, evidence that surgical resection after induction treatment improves overall survival (OS) is lacking. For resectable or potentially resectable stage III, the findings of two phase III trials suggest that surgical resection should not be considered a standard of care but rather reserved for selected patients after critical multidisciplinary assessment, in whom surgery improves survival after downstaging if pneumonectomy can be avoided or in some T4N0-1 resectable tumours. For unresectable stage III NSCLC the standard of care is a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In those patients with good performance status and minimal weight loss, the concurrent approach has resulted in a statistically significant improvement in OS rates compared with a sequential approach in randomised clinical trials, although several questions remain unresolved.

Survival of patients with clinical stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy: age, mediastinal downstaging, and extent of pulmonary resection as independent predictors

BACKGROUND

In clinical stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, the role of surgical resection, particularly pneumonectomy, after induction therapy remains controversial. Our objective was to determine factors predictive of survival after postinduction surgical resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of 136 patients who underwent surgical resection after induction chemotherapy (n = 119) or chemoradiation (n = 17) from June 1990 to January 2010.

RESULTS

One hundred five lobectomies or bilobectomies and 31 pneumonectomies were performed. There was 1 perioperative death (pneumonectomy). Seventy-one patients had downstaging to N0 or N1 nodal status (52%). There were 2 complete pathologic responses. Median follow-up was 42 months (range, 0.69-136 months). Overall 5-year survival for entire cohort was 33% (36% lobectomy, 22% pneumonectomy, P = .001). Patients with pathologic downstaging to pN0 or pN1 had improved 5-year survival (45% vs 20%, P = .003). For patients with pN0 or pN1 disease, survival after lobectomy was better than after pneumonectomy (48% vs 27%, P = .011). In patients with residual N2 disease, there was no statistically significant survival difference between lobectomy and pneumonectomy (5-year survival, 21% vs 19%; P = .136). Multivariate analysis showed as independent predictors of survival age (hazard ratio, 1.05; P = .002), extent of resection (hazard ratio, 2.01; P = .026), and presence of residual pN2 (hazard ratio, 1.60; P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

After induction therapy for patients with clinical stage IIIA disease, both pneumonectomy and lobectomy can be safely performed. Although survival after lobectomy is better, long-term survival can be accomplished after pneumonectomy for appropriately selected patients. Nodal downstaging is important determinant of survival, particularly after lobectomy.