Combined proximal stent grafting plus distal bare metal stenting for management of aortic dissection: Superior to standard endovascular repair?

The Rate of Postoperative Complications in Complicated Acute, and Subacute Type B Aortic Dissections after TEVAR vs. PETTICOAT Procedures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) is suggested as being associated with a lower incidence of aorta-related events and fewer reinterventions compared to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with complicated acute, and subacute type B aortic dissections. Materials and Methods: This article is a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines. The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched, starting on 21 February 2022 and ending on 22 June 2022, to identify studies that investigated the rate of postoperative complications in patients treated with the PETTICOAT compared to the TEVAR. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. Of 2350 studies, 5 studies involving 360 patients were included: 143 patients after the PETTICOAT procedure and 217 after the TEVAR. Results: The meta-analysis of all studies showed that the rate of secondary endovascular reinterventions was smaller in patients treated with the PETTICOAT (n = 3 studies; OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.94; p = 0.04). The results of other postoperative complications (30-day mortality, mortality during follow-up, paraplegia, stroke, and occurrence of endoleak) were lower in the PETTICOAT group but were not statistically significant. The rate of postoperative renal failure was lower in patients treated with the TEVAR (n = 4; OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.46 to 2.51; p = 0.86). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that the PETTICOAT procedure is related to the lower rate of secondary endovascular reinterventions for complicated acute, and subacute type B aortic dissections.

Descending thoracic aortic emergencies: Past, present, and future

The most important descending thoracic aortic (DTA) pathologies are aneurysms, dissections, and traumatic injuries. In acute settings, these conditions can constitute a significant risk of bleeding or ischemia of vital organs, resulting in a fatal outcome. Morbidity and mortality associated with aortic pathologies remain significant, despite improvements in medical therapy and endovascular techniques. In this narrative review, we present an overview of the transitions in the management of these pathologies and discuss current challenges and future perspectives. Diagnostic challenges include differentiating between thoracic aortic pathologies and cardiac diseases. Efforts have been made to identify a blood test that can rapidly differentiate these pathologies. Computed tomography is the cornerstone of diagnosing thoracic aortic emergencies. Our understanding of DTA pathologies has improved substantially due to the significant advancement in imaging modalities in the last 2 decades. On the basis of this understanding, the treatment of these pathologies has been revolutionized. Unfortunately, robust evidence from prospective and randomized studies is still lacking for the management of most DTA diseases. Medical management plays a crucial role in achieving early stability during these life-threatening emergencies. This includes intensive care monitoring, heart rate and blood pressure control, and considering permissive hypotension for patients presenting with ruptured aneurysms. Over the years, surgical management of DTA pathologies changed from open repair to endovascular repair with dedicated stent-grafts. Techniques in both spectrums have improved substantially.

The STABILISE technique to address malperfusion on acute-subacute type B aortic dissections

Endovascular treatment is the current standard of care for complicated acute and subacute type B aortic dissection. Closure of the primary entry tear with thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) is often insufficient to induce complete false lumen thrombosis and a positive aortic remodeling. Moreover, TEVAR does not solve all the cases of malperfusion. The Provisional ExTension to Induce COmplete ATtachment (PETTICOAT) technique (deploying self-expandable bare metal stents in the true lumen in addition to TEVAR) can re-expand the true lumen, stabilize the lamella and promote aortic remodeling, but it does not recreate a single-lumen aorta and long-term aneurysmal degeneration of the aorta is frequent. Endovascular treatment by means of TEVAR + PETTICOAT does not recreate a single-lumen aorta so long-term aneurysmal degeneration of the aorta is frequent. The stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) technique may help to this purpose disrupting the intimal lamella and creating a relaminated uni-luminal aorta.

Clinical Results and Aortic Remodeling After Endovascular Treatment for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection With the “Fabulous” Stent System

Objective

To report the clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling after the implantation of a self-developed, biomechanically optimized, two-stage thoracic stent system named Fabulous.

Background

Given the efficacy of the PETTICOAT concept, the benefits of Fabulous and the behavior of remodeling in different segments need further investigation.

Methods

This is a prospective and multicenter study. From 2017 to 2019, 145 patients (mean age, 56.6 years; 88.3% male) from 14 centers were included in this cohort. The clinical results and core laboratory results were from a central electronic data capture system. Computed tomographic angiography was performed preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months and yearly thereafter and was used for volumetric analysis by 3mensio (Bilthoven, The Netherlands). After the 1-year follow-up, 97.2 and 87.6% of the clinical and imaging results of the eligible patients were available.

Results

Both stent grafts and bare stents were successfully delivered in place in 100% of the patients. The 30-day mortality and 1-year freedom from all-cause mortality were 2.1 and 96.6%, respectively. The incidence of entry flow was 11.7% at 30 days and 6.2% at 365 days. No cases of stent-induced new entry (SINE) or reintervention were observed. After the 1-year follow-up, the true lumen/overall volume ratio reached 88%. The following subdivided segment volume changes were recorded: stent graft segment TL +56%; FL −92%, bare stent segment TL +32%; FL −75%, and there were no significant changes in the visceral segment.

Conclusions

These outcomes indicated that there were favorable clinical benefits of Fabulous stent system. This device achieved a low short-term mortality and a low incidence of reintervention. In addition, patients undergoing Fabulous stent system implantation showed remodeling both on descending aorta and on the distal aorta. The volume changes in the TL and FL varied in the different segments. The long-term follow-up is still ongoing.

STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience

Purpose

To outline the process of the STABILISE technique and its use; reporting patient outcomes and midterm follow up for complicated aortic dissection.

Materials and methods

Single centre retrospective analysis from January 2011 to January 2021 using the STABILISE technique which utilises balloon assistance to facilitate intimal disruption and promote aortic relamination.

Results

Sixteen patients underwent endovascular aortic repair with the STABILISE technique for aortic dissection over the study period. Fourteen patients (14/16; 88%) had acute dissection. Two of 16 (12%) were chronic. The median age of the patient cohort was 61 years (range 32–80 years) and consisted of a male majority (n = 11; 69%). The median time from diagnosis to intervention was 5 days (1–115 days; IQR 1–17.3). More than half (56%) had surgical repair of a acute type A aortic dissection prior to radiological intervention. The procedure was technically successful with no procedural mortality. Two patients were lost to follow up and two died in the post-operative period. Twelve patients had ongoing follow up with an average number of 2.9 ± 1.6 scans performed. Follow up was available in thirteen patients (81%) with a median follow up period of 1097 days (IQR 707–1657). The rate of re-intervention (n = 2/16; 13%) requiring additional stenting was in line with published re-intervention data (15%). Follow up showed a reduction in false lumen size following treatment with total luminal dimensions remaining stable over the follow-up period.

Conclusion

The STABILISE technique as a procedure for complicated aortic dissection, either acute or chronic, appears safe with stable mid-term aortic remodelling and patient outcomes.

Level of evidence

Level 3, Retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of endovascular therapy for Stanford type B aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aorta repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS).

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2019, patients with MFS who underwent TEVAR for TBAD were enrolled. Demographic data, preoperative and perioperative clinical profiles, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. The cumulative survival and freedom from reintervention rates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 38.5 ± 10.7 (range, 24-64 years). The in-hospital mortality was 0. The cumulative survival rate was 88.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.5%-98.5%) at 5 years and 82.9% (95% CI, 60.2%-93.3%) at 10 years. Patients with a thrombosed false lumen (FL) along the length of the stent had a significantly higher cumulative survival rate (P < .05) and freedom from reintervention (P = .01) than patients with patent FL. The freedom from reintervention was 83.4% (95% CI, 61.4% to 93.4%) at 5 years and 50.3% (95% CI, 21.4%-97.3%) at 10 years. There was no significant difference freedom from reintervention in freedom from reintervention between patients with and those without a previous aortic root procedure (P = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR can be performed safely and effectively for TBAD in patients with MFS. Perioperative mortality and morbidity were low; however, lifelong close follow-up in the clinic and imaging are mandatory to prevent aortic rupture. Patients with a patent FL were at high risk of late death.

Successful repair of an arch aneurysm with acute aortic dissection in a patient with Marfan syndrome using a hybrid surgical approach and the stent-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination in aortic dissection repair technique

Endovascular management of aortic complications in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) is uncommon. We treated a patient with MFS with a diagnosis of a 75-mm aortic arch aneurysm and uncomplicated aortic type B dissection using single-stage hybrid surgery combining total arch replacement with elephant trunk and the STABILISE (stent-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination in aortic dissection repair) technique for complete aortic remodeling. The repair was successful, and the aortic true lumen was completely expanded. At 6 months after surgery, clinical evaluation confirmed the early success of the intervention. This type of surgery must be studied further before it can become routine treatment for patients with MFS but it proved safe and feasible.

Outcomes of urgent aortic wrapping for acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Standard surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection is associated with high mortality rates, especially in high-risk patients. In an attempt to improve survival in frail patients, we evaluated the outcomes after ascending aorta wrapping in a high-risk patient cohort.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients treated using ascending aorta wrapping for an acute type A aortic dissection from 2008 to 2019. The primary end points included 30-day mortality, survival during follow-up, and dissection-related mortality. Secondary end points included assessment of aortic remodeling after ascending aorta wrapping. Patients with an aortic anatomy suitable for adjunctive endografting of the ascending aorta were also identified.

RESULTS

Thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent ascending aorta wrapping were included. Their median age was 77 years (range, 46-96 years). The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 9%. Major complications occurred in 7 patients (21%), including early reinterventions in 11 (31%). Median follow-up was 36 months (range, 2.4-106.6; interquartile range, 72). The actuarial survival at 36 months was 82%. The dissection-related mortality was 11.4%. The median aortic growth of the nonwrapped descending thoracic aorta was 3.4 mm. Computed tomography scan analysis depicted that 88% of survivors were theoretical candidates for an additional endovascular procedure to exclude the primary entry tear.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic wrapping is associated with favorable early outcomes and a low rate of aortic events during follow-up. This therapeutic option should be considered for patients considered too fragile for standard surgical repair.

Full PETTICOAT in acute type B aortic dissection with patent false lumen may offer positive remodeling for the distal aorta

OBJECTIVE

The provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique is a unique thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic dissection, which consists of proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare-metal stenting. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the PETTICOAT technique in patients with acute-sub-acute complicated type B aortic dissections. In particular, we compared the remodeling effect of full PETTICOAT covering down to the abdominal aorta with that of simple entry closure.

METHODS

In this retrospective pre-post study, we compared the clinical course of consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR with the PETTICOAT technique in which proximal entry tear was excluded with a covered stent, and extension bare stents were placed down to the abdominal segment for acute-sub-acute complicated type B aortic dissections, between 2015 and 2017, with a control group treated with TEVAR with entry closure between 2011 and 2015. Outcomes included the aortic remodeling rate and the aortic diameter up to 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Subjects consisted of 47 patients (21 in full PETTICOAT group, 26 in the simple entry closure group). The remodeling rate of the abdominal aorta in the full PETTICOAT group was significantly higher than in the simple entry closure group (p < 0.05), while that of the thoracic aorta was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the full PETTICOAT technique achieves better aortic remodeling compared to entry closure alone, and might lead to less reintervention.

Distal bare metal stent implantation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair is beneficial to treat complicated type B aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) plus distal bare metal stent (BMS) implantation leads to favorable clinical outcomes compared with standard TEVAR in treating acute complicated type B aortic dissection.

METHODS

Relevant publications were found through a precise search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Count data were calculated as the odd ratio (OR)and 95% confidence interval (CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method, quantitative data were calculated as mean difference and 95% CI using Inverse Variance statistical method. When the data heterogeneity was large, with an I² > 50%, a random-effects model and sensitivity analysis were performed. The analysis tool we used was the software Revman 5.3 and G*power 3.1.

RESULTS

There were 7 publications involving 958 patients who were enrolled ultimately. The incidence of unplanned secondary intervention and postoperative adverse events in the TEVAR + BMS were lower than standard TEVAR (OR, 0.42, (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.75); OR, 0.57, (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.90)), and the pooled number needed to treat was 15 for unplanned secondary intervention and 15 for postoperative adverse events. There were no significant difference in the aortic-related or all-cause 30-day mortality (OR, 0.81, (95% CI, 0.25 to 2.61); OR, 0.47, (95% CI, 0.18 to 1.22)), aortic-related, all-cause mortality at least 6 months or incidence of the postoperative endoleak (OR, 0.47, (95% CI, 0.17 to 1.32); OR, 0.42, (95% CI, 0.17 to 1.06); OR, 0.81, (95% CI, 0.32 to 2.05)).

CONCLUSION

There is no significant outcome difference except for reduced reintervention but this does not seem to adversely affect survival. It is unclear whether this justifies the additional cost of placing it in every complicated type B aortic dissection regardless of anatomy after standard TEVAR alone. Besides, more data are needed to verify the adjunctive distal bare metal stents' performance at different dissection stages.

A meta-analysis of combined proximal stent grafting with or without adjunctive distal bare stent for the management of aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of placement of a proximal covered stent graft combined with a distal bare stent are controversial because of the lack of evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the outcomes of combined proximal covered stent grafting with distal bare stenting (BS group) and proximal covered stent grafting without distal bare stenting (non-BS group).

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases and key references were searched up to January 26, 2019. Predefined outcomes of interest were mortality, morbidity, and postoperative assessment of aortic remodeling. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) of the outcomes of interest using fixed effects model or random effects model.

RESULTS

Overall, eight observational studies involving 914 patients were included. There were no significant differences in overall aorta-related mortality (RR, 0.54; confidence interval [CI], 0.24-1.24; P = .15), complete thoracic false lumen (FL) thrombosis rate (RR, 1.23; CI, 0.83-1.81; P = .30), or complete abdominal FL thrombosis rate (RR, 1.96; CI, 0.68-5.69; P = .21) between the BS group and the non-BS group. The BS group had a lower rate of partial thoracic FL thrombosis (RR, 0.40; CI, 0.25-0.65; P = .0002), a lower stent graft-induced new entry rate (RR, 0.08; CI, 0.02-0.41; P = .003), and a lower reintervention rate (RR, 0.42; CI, 0.26-0.69; P = .0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined proximal covered stent grafting with distal adjunctive bare stenting had the potential to reduce the partial thoracic FL thrombosis rate and the rates of stent graft-induced new entry and reintervention but was not associated with lower aorta-related mortality or the complete FL thrombosis rate. Further research with a stricter methodology is needed.

Improved Remodeling With TEVAR and Distal Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Complicated Type B Dissection

BACKGROUND

The ASSIST (A multicentre Study in Survivors of type B aortic dissection undergoing Stenting) study compared both 1-year outcomes and evolution of true and false lumen (eg, remodeling) in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection subjected to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with distal true lumen scaffolding by self-expanding nitinol open stent in comparison with TEVAR alone.

METHODS

The ASSIST study was a multicenter prospective single-arm study comparing clinical and imaging data from 39 consecutive patients (59.4 ± 13 years of age) who received TEVAR and the JOTEC E-XL open stent with data from matched control subjects treated with TEVAR alone based on 1:1 propensity score matching. Clinical data were collected by an independent Contract Research Organization (CRO) and computed tomography images were subjected to blinded core-lab analysis.

RESULTS

There were no differences in baseline demographics, clinical profiles, morphological data, procedural details, and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes between groups. Differences emerged with regard to evolution of both true lumen distal to stent graft, false lumen over the entire length of dissection, and remodeling (P < .001). At 1 year, TEVAR with the E-XL stent revealed false lumen thrombosis at the level of celiac trunk in 53.8% vs 17.9% with TEVAR alone (P = .004). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated favorable clinical outcomes with the additional E-XL stent.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR for acute complicated type B aortic dissection proved to be safe and promoted remodeling of the stent grafted thoracic aorta. Additional scaffolding of the true lumen distal to TEVAR with a self-expanding stent supported distal true lumen expansion, false lumen regression, and thrombosis, with evidence of improved distal remodeling at 1 year.

Combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting (PETTICOAT technique) versus conventional proximal descending aortic stent graft repair for complicated type B aortic dissections

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection is a separation of the aortic wall, caused by blood flowing through a tear in the inner layer of the aorta. Aortic dissection is an infrequent but life-threatening condition. The incidence of aortic dissection is 3 to 6 per 10,000 per year in the Western population, and can be up to 43 per 10,000 per year in the Eastern population. Over 20% of people with an aortic dissection do not reach a hospital alive. After admission, the mortality rates for people with an aortic dissection are between 10% and 20% for those who received endovascular treatment, and between 20% and 30% for those who had open surgery. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the standard endovascular method to treat complicated type B aortic dissection (aortic dissections without involvement of the ascending aorta). Although TEVAR is less invasive than open surgery and has a better long-term aortic remodeling effect than conservative medical treatment, favourable aortic remodelling is usually limited to the thoracic aortic segment. TEVAR cannot be extended into the abdominal aorta because it could cover the ostia of the reno-visceral arteries. Thus, the abdominal aorta is still at risk of progressive aneurysmal degeneration. The PETTICOAT (provisional extension to induce complete attachment) technique, with proximal endograft and distal bare metal stent, was proposed in 2006 to address this issue. The concept of this technique was to implant a distal bare metal stent into the aortic true lumen, distal to the proximal endograft, to stabilize the distal collapsed intimal flap, while allowing blood flow to reno-visceral arteries. Therefore, the PETTICOAT technique was considered to be related to a more extensive aortic remodelling for people with type B aortic dissection, especially in the area of the abdominal aorta. However, it is still unclear whether the PETTICOAT technique is superior to standard TEVAR.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting versus conventional proximal descending aortic stent graft repair for treating complicated type B aortic dissections.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 5 November 2018. We also undertook reference checking and citation searching to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered all randomised controlled trials which compared the outcome of complicated type B aortic dissection, when treated by combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting (PETTICOAT technique) versus conventional proximal descending aortic stent graft repair.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent review authors assessed all references identified by the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist. We planned to undertake data collection and analysis in accordance with recommendations described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no trials that met the inclusion criteria for this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We identified no randomised controlled trials and therefore cannot draw any definite conclusion on this topic. Evidence from non-randomised studies appears to be favourable in the short-term, for combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting (PETTICOAT technique) to solve the problem of unfavourable distal aortic remodeling. Randomised controlled trials are warranted to provide solid evidence on this topic. Evidence from cohort studies with large sample sizes would also be helpful in guiding clinical practice.

Distal Extended Endovascular Aortic Repair PETTICOAT: A Modified Technique to Improve False Lumen Remodeling in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Data from the literature suggest that in patients with acute, complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD), initial successful treatment with thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) is not necessarily associated with favorable remodeling of the dissected aorta during follow-up, and long-term results indicate that TEVAR failed to completely suppress false lumen patency. Sealing of all relevant distal reentries, infrarenal and/or iliac, seems to be the key issue to induce total false lumen thrombosis in abdominal aorta as well as the iliac arteries, especially in complicated patients presenting with malperfusion or complete true lumen collapse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 34 consecutive patients diagnosed with cTBAD at our hospital from January 2015 to April 2018, 30 had complicated dissections receiving endovascular treatment according to the standard Provisional ExTension To Induce COmplete ATtachment (PETTICOAT) technique and were excluded from this study, whereas 4 patients with radiologic evidence of multiple reentry tears at detached lumbar arteries and iliac bifurcation with complete true lumen collapse and clinical evidence of malperfusion were treated with a modified PETTICOAT technique with distal extension of the aortic stent, balloon expansion of the stented true lumen, and use of the AFX bifurcated endograft system to preserve the natural aortic bifurcation and provide complete distal sealing of reentry tears.

RESULTS

Primary technical success was achieved in all patients. No postoperative deaths were observed, but 1 patient experienced an hemorrhagic shock on the second postoperative day. No patient suffered postoperative stroke, paraplegia, paraparesis, or acute renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an abdominal aortic bifurcated endograft with PETTICOAT to treat acute cTBAD seems to be a feasible approach in high-risk patients to improve aortic remodeling. The AFX bifurcated endograft system meets the requirements of anatomical fixation and sealing of distal tears.

Symptomatic Aortic Bare-Metal Stent Fracture after PETTICOAT Technique for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Aortic bare-metal stent rupture is an exceptional complication, associated with high risk of aorta rupture and death. We describe a successful endovascular approach for a symptomatic aortic bare-metal stent fracture after the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique.

METHODS

A 53-year-old man with a complicated type B aortic dissection (visceral malperfusion) was treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and "PETTICOAT" technique. The 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up scans showed progressive aortic remodeling. After 15 months from the initial procedure, the patient was admitted to the emergency department with severe thoracic pain and two syncopal episodes. Urgent angio-computed tomography (CT) showed bare-metal stent rupture and aortic dilatation to 45 mm at the site of stent fracture.

RESULTS

He was urgently treated with TEVAR to cover the entire length of the bare-metal stent under local anesthesia and motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. If signs of medullary ischemia are observed in the MEP register, a carotid-subclavian bypass was planned. At 12 months of follow-up, the patient remains asymptomatic. CT scan at 1 month and 12 months showed no signs of endoleak and aortic remodeling to 40 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Although unusual, this case demonstrates the possibility of material fatigue/failure and highlights the need of close imaging follow-up after TEVAR for treatment of aortic diseases.

Is TEVAR with Full Petticoat Technique Effective for Complicated Acute Type B Dissection Cases?

Treatment by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B dissection has improved outcomes. We tried the procedure named “Full Petticoat technique” in which the proximal entry tear was excluded with a covered stent and extended bare metal stents were placed to the aortic bifurcation for three complicated type B dissection cases with dynamic obstruction of the common iliac artery. Follow-up computed tomography revealed favorable aortic remodeling in which the true lumen was expanded. The short-term result of this procedure has shown acceptable aortic remodeling. The significance of this procedure is still unknown in the long term; hence long-term follow-up is necessary to completely understand the usefulness of this technique.

Fate of distal aorta after frozen elephant trunk and total arch replacement for type A aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The use of the frozen elephant trunk technique for type A aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome is limited by the lack of imaging evidence for long-term aortic remodeling. We seek to evaluate the changes of the distal aorta and late outcomes after frozen elephant trunk and total arch replacement for type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2015, we performed frozen elephant trunk + total arch replacement for 172 patients with Marfan syndrome suffering from type A aortic dissection (94 acute; 78 chronic). Mean age was 34.6 ± 9.3 years, and 121 were male (70.3%). Early mortality was 8.1% (14/172), and follow-up was complete in 98.7% (156/158) at a mean of 6.2 ± 3.3 years. Aortic dilatation was defined as a maximal diameter of greater than 50 mm or an average growth rate of greater than 5 mm/year at any segment detected by computed tomographic angiography. Temporal changes in the false and true lumens and maximal aortic size were analyzed with linear mixed modeling.

RESULTS

After surgery, false lumen obliteration occurred in 86%, 39%, 26%, and 21% at the frozen elephant trunk, unstented descending aorta, diaphragm, and renal artery, respectively. The true lumen expanded significantly over time at all segments (P < .001), whereas the false lumen shrank at the frozen elephant trunk (P < .001) and was stable at distal levels (P > .05). Maximal aortic size was stable at the frozen elephant trunk and renal artery (P > .05), but grew at the descending aorta (P = .001) and diaphragm (P < .001). Respective maximal aortic sizes before discharge were 40.2 mm, 32.1 mm, 31.6 mm, and 26.9 mm, and growth rate was 0.4 mm/year, 2.8 mm/year, 3.6 mm/year, and 2.6 mm/year. By the latest follow-up, distal maximal aortic size was stable in 63.5% (99/156), and complete remodeling down to the mid-descending aorta occurred in 28.8% (45/156). There were 22 late deaths and 23 distal reoperations. Eight-year incidence of death was 15%, reoperation rate was 20%, and event-free survival was 65%. Preoperative distal maximal aortic size (mm) predicted dilatation (hazard ratio, 1.11; P < .001) and reoperation (hazard ratio, 1.07; P < .001). A patent false lumen in the descending aorta predicted dilatation (hazard ratio, 3.88; P < .001), reoperation (hazard ratio, 3.36; P = .014), and late death (hazard ratio, 3.31; P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

The frozen elephant trunk technique can expand the true lumen across the aorta, decrease or stabilize the false lumen, and stabilize the distal aorta in patients with Marfan syndrome with type A aortic dissection, thereby inducing favorable remodeling in the distal aorta. This study adds long-term clinical and radiologic evidence supporting the use of the frozen elephant trunk technique for type A dissection in Marfan syndrome.

Early Results of the PETTICOAT Technique for the Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Conventional surgical techniques for acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) generally fail to address residual dissection in the descending aorta. The persistence of a false lumen is associated with visceral malperfusion in the acute setting and adverse aortic remodeling in the chronic setting. Hybrid aortic arch repair techniques may improve perioperative and long-term mortality by expanding the true lumen and obliterating the false lumen. However, there is a limit to the extent of aortic coverage due to the concomitant risk of spinal cord ischemia. In Type B dissection, the PETTICOAT (Provisional Extension To Induce Complete Attachment) technique, which entails stent graft coverage of the primary intimal tear followed by bare metal stent placement distally, may improve true lumen caliber and promote false lumen thrombosis without increasing the risk of spinal cord ischemia, as intercostal branches remain perfused through the bare metal stents. The technique of hybrid arch with surgical creation of a Dacron landing zone covering a stent graft in the proximal descending aorta and bare metal stents in the thoraco-abdominal aorta is a promising concept in the treatment of ATAAD.

Endovascular management of chronic symptomatic aortic dissection with the Streamliner Multilayer Flow Modulator: Twelve-month outcomes from the global registry

OBJECTIVE

Reported are initial 12-month outcomes of patients with chronic symptomatic aortic dissection managed by the Streamliner Multilayer Flow Modulator (SMFM; Cardiatis, Isnes, Belgium). Primary end points were freedom from rupture- and aortic-related death, and reduction in false lumen index. Secondary end points were patency of great vessels and visceral branches, and freedom of stroke, paraplegia, and renal failure.

METHODS

Out of 876 SMFM implanted globally, we have knowledge of 542. To date, 312 patients are maintained in the global registry, of which 38 patients were identified as having an aortic dissection (12.2%). Indications included 35 Stanford type B dissections, two Stanford type A and B dissections, and one mycotic Stanford type B dissection.

RESULTS

There were no reported ruptures or aortic-related deaths. All cause survival was 85.3% Twelve-month freedom from neurologic events was 100%, and there were no incidences of end-organ ischemia, paraplegia or renal insult. Morphologic analysis exhibited dissection remodeling by a reduction in longitudinal length of the dissected aorta, and false lumen volume. A statistically significant reduction in false lumen index (P = .016) at 12 months, and a borderline significant increase in true lumen volume (P = .053) confirmed dissection remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

The SMFM is an option in management of complex pan-aortic dissection. Results highlight SMFM implantation leads to dissection stabilization with no further aneurysm progression, and no retrograde type A dissection. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair by SMFM ensued in freedom from aortic rupture, neurologic stroke, paraplegia and renal failure. Further analysis of the global registry data will inform long-term outcomes.

The PETTICOAT Technique for Complicated Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Using a Tapered Self-Expanding Nitinol Device as Distal Uncovered Stent

BACKGROUND

Provisional Extension To Induce Complete Attachment (PETTICOAT) technique has shown good results in the treatment of acute type B aortic dissections (ABAD). Usually, uncovered tubular stainless steel stents are used to promote distal true lumen reattachment.

METHODS

We describe the Petticoat technique using a conic self-expanding nitinol device as distal uncovered stent in five cases of complicated ABAD. We used as distal uncovered stent the single-flared E-XL (Jotec-GmbH).

RESULTS

In one case, renal arteries were successfully stented through the large cells of the E-XL. No perioperative complications were reported. During follow-up (18-24 months), positive remodeling of the entire aorta occurred in 3 cases; in 1 case with associated thoracoabdominal aneurysm, false lumen thrombosis at the thoracic level with true lumen expansion at the visceral aorta was detected at the 18-month CT angiogram, and in 1 patient with Marfan syndrome, open surgical conversion with the E-XL explantation was performed after 24 months due to aneurysmal evolution at the visceral level.

CONCLUSIONS

The E-XL can be successfully used in ABAD. It adapts to different aortic diameters, and its major radial force promotes successful positive remodeling. The open cell structure allows visceral arteries stenting, and it can be removed without complications during open conversion.

A pitfall of false lumen embolization in chronic aortic dissection: intimal injury caused by the embolization device edge

We report a case of intimal injury caused by the occluder device in the false lumen (FL) after treatment of refractory chronic aortic dissection with FL embolization. We speculate that the intimal injury was due to the disproportionate stress from the FL. We covered the new entry by an additional stent graft in the true lumen. The deployment of a stent device in both lumens at the level of embolization might be indispensable for FL embolization.

Aiming at one-stage corrective surgery for extended thoracic aortic dilatation

Definitive treatment of extended thoracic aortic dilatation is a major surgical challenge. Histopathology of resected thoracic aortic wall may reveal undiagnosed aortitis affecting outcome. We sought to investigate the benefit of thorough histopathology after one-stage corrective surgery for the treatment of extended thoracic aortic dilatation. Five patients underwent one-stage corrective surgery using the hybrid open arch repair by the frozen elephant trunk together with endovascular aortic grafting. A representative sample of the resected aortic arch was procured for histology. T- and B-lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) positivity were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The mean preoperative maximum aortic diameter was 54 mm (range, 41-79 mm). The mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 1-24 months). As confirmed by computed tomography (CT) upon follow-up, complete thrombosis of the false lumen at the level of the frozen elephant trunk was achieved in all patients with dissection. One patient was operated due to atherosclerotic dilatation of the thoracic aorta, and postoperative CT showed successful exclusion of the atherosclerotic dilatation; this 75-year-old man was diagnosed with IgG4-positive aortitis and experienced unexpected blindness after surgery without evidence of emboli or long-term neurological impairment upon repeated brain CT. The hybrid open arch repair by the frozen elephant trunk and simultaneous endovascular repair is a feasible choice for one-stage surgery through sternotomy aiming at definitive treatment of extended thoracic aortic pathology. However, systematic evaluation of inflammation may reveal concealed aortitis affecting postoperative outcome and need for long-term surveillance.

Endovascular repair of acute uncomplicated aortic type B dissection promotes aortic remodelling: 1 year results of the ADSORB trial

OBJECTIVES

Uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (AD) treated conservatively has a 10% 30-day mortality and up to 25% need intervention within 4 years. In complicated AD, stent grafts have been encouraging. The aim of the present prospective randomised trial was to compare best medical treatment (BMT) with BMT and Gore TAG stent graft in patients with uncomplicated AD. The primary endpoint was a combination of incomplete/no false lumen thrombosis, aortic dilatation, or aortic rupture at 1 year.

METHODS

The AD history had to be less than 14 days, and exclusion criteria were rupture, impending rupture, malperfusion. Of the 61 patients randomised, 80% were DeBakey type IIIB.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were randomised to the BMT group and 30 to the BMT+TAG group. Mean age was 63 years for both groups. The left subclavian artery was completely covered in 47% and in part in 17% of the cases. During the first 30 days, no deaths occurred in either group, but there were three crossovers from the BMT to the BMT+TAG group, all due to progression of disease within 1 week. There were two withdrawals from the BMT+TAG group. At the 1-year follow up there had been another two failures in the BMT group: one malperfusion and one aneurysm formation (p = .056 for all). One death occurred in the BMT+TAG group. For the overall endpoint BMT+TAG was significantly different from BMT only (p < .001). Incomplete false lumen thrombosis, was found in 13 (43%) of the TAG+BMT group and 30 (97%) of the BMT group (p < .001). The false lumen reduced in size in the BMT+TAG group (p < .001) whereas in the BMT group it increased. The true lumen increased in the BMT+TAG (p < .001) whereas in the BMT group it remained unchanged. The overall transverse diameter was the same at the beginning and after 1 year in the BMT group (42.1 mm), but in the BMT+TAG it decreased (38.8 mm; p = .062).

CONCLUSIONS

Uncomplicated AD can be safely treated with the Gore TAG device. Remodelling with thrombosis of the false lumen and reduction of its diameter is induced by the stent graft, but long term results are needed.