Pulmonary resections performed at hospitals with thoracic surgery residency programs have superior outcomes

Effect of General Surgery Resident Participation in Thoracic Surgery on Oncologic Outcomes: An Observational Cohort Study

Background: Despite increasing sub-specialization, general surgeons continue to perform oncologic thoracic surgeries. Our objective was to determine whether general surgery resident participation in thoracic surgery affects surgical quality or oncologic outcomes. We hypothesized that patient outcomes with and without resident participation would be similar. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of patients with stage 0-IV lung cancer undergoing oncologic pulmonary resection at BLINDED FOR REVIEW during an 11-year period (2012-2022). Patients younger than 18 years or older than 85 years were excluded, as were those who had incomplete follow-up data or were unregistered in our institutional cancer registry. Patients were divided into groups based on whether residents or staff surgeons completed >50% of the critical portions of the operation. We compared 30-day morbidity outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Three hundred thirteen patients met inclusion criteria. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups, as were types of surgical resection and median operative times. A statistical difference was found in the distribution of surgical approach. The odds of morbidity were 65% higher in the Staff group (OR=1.65; 95% CI, 1.007-2.71). Resident participation was not significantly associated with OS or DFS (P =.32 and P =.54, respectively). Discussion: General surgery resident involvement in lung cancer operations is not associated with longer operative times but is associated with a higher likelihood of a thoracotomy. General surgery resident involvement was associated with decreased postoperative morbidity and did not significantly affect OS or DFS.

Failure to rescue following anatomical lung resection. Analysis of a prospective nationwide database

Background

Rescue failure has been described as an important factor that conditions postoperative mortality after surgical interventions. The objective of this study is to determine the incidence and main determinants of failure to rescue after anatomical lung resections.

Methods

Prospective multicenter study that included all patients undergoing anatomical pulmonary resection between December 2016 and March 2018 and registered in the Spanish nationwide database GEVATS. Postoperative complications were classified as minor (grades I and II) and major (grades IIIa to V) according to the Clavien-Dindo standardized classification. Patients that died after a major complication were considered rescue failure. A stepwise logistic regression model was created to identify predictors of failure to rescue.

Results

3,533 patients were analyzed. In total, 361 cases (10.2%) had major complications, of which 59 (16.3%) could not be rescued. The variables associated with rescue failure were: ppoDLCO% (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1; p = 0.067), cardiac comorbidity (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4; p = 0.024), extended resection (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.94-5.41; p = 0.067), pneumonectomy (OR, 2.53; 95 CI, 1.07-6.03; p = 0.036) and hospital volume <120 cases per year (OR, 2.53; CI 95%, 1.26-5.07; p = 0.009). The area under the curve of the ROC curve was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64-0.79).

Conclusion

A significant percentage of patients who presented major complications after anatomical lung resection did not survive to discharge. Pneumonectomy and annual surgical volume are the risk factors most closely related to rescue failure. Complex thoracic surgical pathology should be concentrated in high-volume centers to obtain the best results in potentially high-risk patients.

Mortality predictors in complicated patients after anatomical lung resection

INTRODUCTION

Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as the mortality rate among patients suffering from postoperative complications, is considered an indicator of the quality of surgical care. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with FTR after anatomical lung resections.

METHOD

Patients undergoing anatomical lung resection at our center between 1994 and 2018 were included in the study. Postoperative complications were classified as minor (grade I and II) and major (grade IIIA to V), according to the standardized classification of postoperative morbidity. Patients who died after a major complication were considered FTR. A stepwise logistic regression model was created to identify FTR predictors. Independent variables included in the multivariate analysis were age, body mass index, cardiac, renal, and cerebrovascular comorbidity, ppoFEV1%, VATS approach, extended resection, pneumonectomy, and reintervention. A non-parametric ROC curve was constructed to estimate the predictive capacity of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 2.569 patients were included, of which 223 (8.9%) had major complications and 49 (22%) could not be rescued. Variables associated with FTR were: age (OR: 1.07), history of cerebrovascular accident (OR: 3.53), pneumonectomy (OR: 6.67), and reintervention (OR: 12.26). The area under the ROC curve was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 22% of patients with major complications following anatomical lung resection in this series did not survive until discharge. Pneumonectomy and reintervention are the most significant risk factors for FTR.

Effect of On-Site Cardiac Surgery Program on General Thoracic Surgery Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Limited data exist exploring the relationship between multispecialty surgical collaboration and outcomes in general thoracic surgery. To address this, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was analyzed to determine whether the presence of an on-site cardiac surgery program is associated with improved general thoracic surgery outcomes.

METHODS

The NIS (1999-2008) was utilized to identify 389,959 patients who had a lobectomy, pneumonectomy, or esophagectomy. Short-term outcomes of patients undergoing these procedures were compared between hospitals with and without an on-site cardiac surgery program. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine patient and hospital predictors of mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

During the study period, patients undergoing lobectomy (n = 314,130), pneumonectomy (n = 34,860), or esophagectomy (n = 40,969) were identified. Univariate analysis demonstrated lower mortality for lobectomy (P < 0.001) and esophagectomy (P < 0.001) but not pneumonectomy (P = 0.344) in hospitals with a cardiac surgery program. All-cause morbidity was significantly lower for all 3 procedures in hospitals with a cardiac surgery program. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that a cardiac surgery program was not an independent predictor when adjusted for known confounders, particularly procedure volume and hospital academic teaching status.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an on-site cardiac surgery program is not in and of itself associated with improved general thoracic surgery outcomes. The presence of a cardiac surgery program is likely a surrogate for other known predictors of improved outcomes such as hospital teaching status and procedure volume.

Mortality Predictors In Complicated Patients After Anatomical Lung Resection

INTRODUCTION

Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as the mortality rate among patients suffering from postoperative complications, is considered an indicator of the quality of surgical care. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with FTR after anatomical lung resections.

METHOD

Patients undergoing anatomical lung resection at our center between 1994 and 2018 were included in the study. Postoperative complications were classified as minor (grade I and II) and major (grade IIIA to V), according to the standardized classification of postoperative morbidity. Patients who died after a major complication were considered FTR. A stepwise logistic regression model was created to identify FTR predictors. Independent variables included in the multivariate analysis were age, body mass index, cardiac, renal, and cerebrovascular comorbidity, ppoFEV1%, VATS approach, extended resection, pneumonectomy, and reintervention. A non-parametric ROC curve was constructed to estimate the predictive capacity of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 2,569 patients were included, of which 223 (8.9%) had major complications and 49 (22%) could not be rescued. Variables associated with FTR were: age (OR: 1.07), history of cerebrovascular accident (OR: 3.53), pneumonectomy (OR: 6.67), and reintervention (OR: 12.26). The area under the ROC curve was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 22% of patients with major complications following anatomical lung resection in this series did not survive until discharge. Pneumonectomy and reintervention are the most significant risk factors for FTR.

[Evaluation of surgical practice in the treatment of lung cancer in France from the PMSI national database]

BACKGROUND

In recent years, improving the quality of care has been a concern for health professionals in France, through the certification of institutions, accreditation and continuous professional development. Evaluation of these different measures has rarely been carried out. The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of surgical management of lung cancer in different regions using hospital mortality as an indicator.

METHOD

From the national database of the Program of Medical Information Systems (PMSI), data on all patients who had undergone surgery for lung cancer were extracted as well as the characteristics of the centers. The main outcome criterion was hospital mortality. Logistic models allowed an estimation of the risk standardized mortality rate for each center.

RESULTS

From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, 10,675 patients underwent surgery for lung cancer in 158 French centers. The hospital mortality rate was 3.43% (n=366). Thirty-nine facilities (25%) performed fewer than 15 pulmonary resections. The minimum activity volume was a single pulmonary resection during the year and the maximum was 300 interventions with a coefficient of variation estimated at 147%. Hospital mortality ranged from 0 % to 50% depending on the entries with a coefficient of variation of 112%. For some regions, it is possible to count up to 5 centers per million inhabitants (Languedoc-Roussillon) or 4 centers per million inhabitants (Limousin, Pays-de-Loire). The majority of regions had 3 centers per million inhabitants. Eleven regions have no centers with a standardized mortality rate below 3%. Five regions (Languedoc-Roussillon, Pays-de-Loire, Aquitaine, Brittany and Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur) have at least two centers with a risk standardized rate of mortality above 4%. Among the academic centers, 20% have a risk standardized mortality rate of less than 3%. Among the centers with a risk standardized rate of mortality<3%, 20% performed more than 39 pulmonary resections, 7% between 39 and 15 procedures and 0% for centers with<15 interventions.

CONCLUSION

This work confirms that hospital volume is one of the components of quality of care. The number of centers should be adapted to the actual needs of the population in order to enable patients to access effective services.

Predictors of Failure to Rescue After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death after a major complication, is a metric increasingly being used to assess quality of care. Risk factors associated with FTR after esophagectomy have not been previously studied.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric conduit between 2010 and 2014. Patients with at least one major postoperative complication were grouped according to inhospital mortality (FTR group) and survival to discharge (SUR group). A stepwise logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of FTR.

RESULTS

A total of 1,730 patients comprised the study group, with 102 (5.9%) in the FTR group and 1,628 (94.1%) in the SUR group. The FTR patients were older (69.0 versus 64.0 years, p < 0.0001) compared with the SUR patients. There were no differences in sex, body mass index, preoperative weight loss, smoking status, operation type, or surgeon specialty between the two groups. Age greater than 75 years (adjusted odds ratio 2.68, p < 0.0001), black race (adjusted odds ratio 2.75, p = 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 or 5 (adjusted odds ratio 1.82, p = 0.02), and the occurrence of pneumonia, respiratory failure, acute renal failure, sepsis, or acute myocardial infarction were predictive of FTR based on multivariable logistic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 6% of patients who have a major complication after esophagectomy do not survive to discharge. Age greater than 75 years, black race, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 or 5, and complications related to major infection or organ failure predict FTR. Further research is necessary to investigate how these factors affect survival after complications in order to improve rescue efforts.

Failure-to-Rescue in Thoracic Surgery

Variability in outcomes not attributable to case mix or chance is an indicator of low-quality care. Failure-to-rescue is an outcome measure defined as death during a hospitalization among patients who experience a complication. Researchers have used this measure to better understand the determinants of an untimely death-preventing complications, rescue, or both. Studies repeatedly find that complication rates vary little, if at all, across hospitals ranked by risk-adjusted mortality rates, suggesting that hospitals are equally capable (or incapable) of preventing complications. In contrast, variation in failure-to-rescue rates seems to explain much of the variation in risk-adjusted hospital-level mortality rates. These findings suggest that system-level interventions that allow for the early detection and treatment of complications (ie, rescue) may reduce variability in hospital-level outcomes and improve the quality of thoracic surgical care.

In-hospital mortality following lung cancer resection: nationwide administrative database

Our aim was to determine the effect of a national strategy for quality improvement in cancer management (the "Plan Cancer") according to time period and to assess the influence of type and volume of hospital activity on in-hospital mortality (IHM) within a large national cohort of patients operated on for lung cancer.From January 2005 to December 2013, 76 235 patients were included in the French Administrative Database. Patient characteristics, hospital volume of activity and hospital type were analysed over three periods: 2005-2007, 2008-2010 and 2011-2013.Global crude IHM was 3.9%: 4.3% during 2005-2007, 4% during 2008-2010 and 3.5% during 2011-2013 (p<0.01). 296, 259 and 209 centres performed pulmonary resections in 2005-2007, 2008-2010 and 2011-2013, respectively (p<0.01). The risk of death was higher in centres performing <13 resections per year than in centres performing >43 resections per year (adjusted (a)OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.197-1.834). The risk of death was lower in the period 2011-2013 than in the period 2008-2010 (aOR 0.841, 95% CI 0.764-0.926). Adjustment variables (age, sex, Charlson score and type of resection) were significantly linked to IHM, whereas the type of hospital was not.The French national strategy for quality improvement seems to have induced a significant decrease in IHM.

The impact of certification of general thoracic surgeons on lung cancer mortality: a survey by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The Japanese Board of General Thoracic Surgery and the annual survey by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery (JATS) of certified hospitals began in 2005; since then, over 1300 specialists and 650 hospitals have been certified by this system. To evaluate how this system contributes to improving the outcomes of general thoracic surgery, the effects of the number of certified general thoracic surgeons (GTSs) and hospital volume on 30-day mortality or hospital mortality were evaluated.

METHODS

Using data from the annual survey of JATS from 2005 to 2012, the outcomes of 211 619 patients who underwent lung resection for lung cancer were evaluated. The patients were divided into four groups by the level of surgery: first level, partial resection; second level, segmentectomy and lobectomy; third level, sleeve segmentectomy and lobectomy; and fourth level, pneumonectomy, sleeve pneumonectomy and pleuro-pneumonectomy. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associations between operative mortality and the number of GTSs, hospital volume and level of surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day and hospital mortality rates were 0.40 and 0.77%, respectively. The 30-day and hospital mortality rates for each surgical level were 0.20 and 0.35% for the first level, 0.36 and 0.73% for the second level, 1.02 and 1.81% for the third level and 2.42 and 4.26% for the fourth level, respectively. The number of GTSs was associated with lower 30-day and hospital mortality rates (P < 0.0001). On logistic analysis, number of GTSs (<3 vs ≥3), hospital volume (<50 vs ≥50) and level of procedure (1 vs 2, 3 vs 2, 4 vs 2) were significantly associated with 30-day and hospital mortality rates. For 30-day mortality, the odds ratios were 0.688 (P < 0.0001) for higher number of GTSs and 0.856 (P = 0.0510) for higher volume hospitals. In the subgroup analysis by surgical level, low 30-day and hospital mortality rates in the second and fourth surgical levels were correlated with a higher number of GTSs.

CONCLUSIONS

The current decrease in overall 30-day mortality rates from the JATS data showed greater dependence on the number of GTSs than on the hospital volume. We believe that the certification system in Japan is useful for the establishment of GTS status.

Surgical treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Surgical resection remains the standard of care for functionally operable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and resectable stage IIIA disease. The role of invasive staging and restaging techniques is currently being debated, but they provide the largest biopsy samples which allow for precise mediastinal staging. Different types of operative procedures are currently available to the thoracic surgeon, and some of these interventions can be performed by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with the same oncological results as those by open thoracotomy. The principal aim of surgical treatment for NSCLC is to obtain a complete resection which has been precisely defined by a working group of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Intraoperative staging of lung cancer is of utmost importance to decide on the extent of resection according to the intraoperative tumour (T) and nodal (N) status. Systematic nodal dissection is generally advocated to evaluate the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes which are subdivided into seven zones according to the most recent 7th tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. Lymph-node involvement not only determines prognosis but also the administration of adjuvant therapy.

In 2011, a new multidisciplinary adenocarcinoma classification was published introducing the concepts of adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. This classification has profound surgical implications. The role of limited or sublobar resection, comprising anatomical segmentectomy and wide wedge resection, is reconsidered for early-stage lesions which are more frequently encountered with the recently introduced large screening programmes. Numerous retrospective non-randomised studies suggest that sublobar resection may be an acceptable surgical treatment for early lung cancers, also when performed by VATS.

More tailored, personalised therapy has recently been introduced. Quality-of-life parameters and surgical quality indicators become increasingly important to determine the short-term and long-term impact of a surgical procedure. International databases currently collect extensive surgical data, allowing more precise calculation of mortality and morbidity according to predefined risk factors. Centralisation of care has been shown to improve results. Evidence-based guidelines should be further developed to provide optimal staging and therapeutic algorithms.

Outcomes and Costs for Major Lung Resection in the United States: Which Patients Benefit Most From High-Volume Referral?

BACKGROUND

Accountable care organizations are designed to improve value by decreasing costs and maintaining quality. Strategies to maximize value are needed for high-risk surgery. We wanted to understand whether certain patient groups were differentially associated with better outcomes at high-volume hospitals in terms of quality and cost.

METHODS

In all, 37,746 patients underwent elective major lung resection in 1,273 hospitals in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2007 to 2011. Patients were stratified by hospital volume quartile and substratified by preoperative mortality risk, age, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status. Mortality was evaluated using clustered multivariable hierarchical logistic regression controlling for patient comorbidity, demographics, and procedure. Adjusted cost was evaluated using generalized linear models fit to a gamma distribution.

RESULTS

Patients were grouped into volume quartiles based on cases per year (less than 21, 21 to 40, 40 to 78, and more than 78). Patient characteristics and procedure mix differed across quartiles. Overall, mortality decreased across volume quartiles (lowest 1.9% versus highest 1.1%, p < 0.0001). Patients aged more than 80 years were associated with greater absolute and relative mortality rates than patients less than 60 years old in highest volume versus lowest volume hospitals (age more than 80 years, 4.2% versus 1.3%, p < 0.0001, odds ratio 3.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.89 to 5.80; age less than 60 years, 1.0% versus 0.8%, p = 0.19, odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 2.56). Patients with high preoperative risk (more than 75th percentile) were also associated with lower absolute mortality in high-volume hospitals. Adjusted costs were not significantly different across quartiles or patient strata.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients show a significantly stronger volume-outcome relationship than patients less than 60 years of age. Costs were equivalent across volume quartile and patient strata. Selective patient referral may be a strategy to improve outcomes for elderly patients undergoing lung resection.

The association between surgical volume, survival and quality of care

Improving surgical outcomes is important to the thoracic surgical community and operative mortality is often used as a benchmark to gauge the quality of lung resection. In lung cancer surgery, increasing hospital volume is associated with better survival although the categorisation of procedure volume is arbitrary. When US and UK data are scrutinised, the association holds true for increasingly higher volumes up to 150 resection per year and more. The reason may be due to better infrastructure, better-staffed units, more resources and wider specialist and technology-based services in higher volume centers. For individual surgeon volume, reports are not consistent. However, studies suggest that surgeon sub-specialty is an important consideration. The results of general thoracic surgeons and cardiac surgeons are reported to be better than general surgeons for lung resection surgery, and the effects of specialty training was also associated with an increase in the number of patients undergoing lung resection. We conclude that the current evidence strongly supports the association between increasing hospital volume with lower mortality and improved long-term survival following lung resection. Whilst the data presented supports centralization of lung cancer surgery in high volume hospitals, patient choice and the threshold of quality of improvement required to overcome travel and closure of local services need to be considered.

The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on the 30-day mortality of lung cancer surgery: A nation-based reappraisal

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to analyze the time trend variation of 30-day mortality after lung cancer surgery, and to quantify the impact of surgeon and hospital volumes over a 5-year period in France.

METHODS

We used Epithor, the French national thoracic database and benchmark tool, which catalogues more than 180,000 procedures of 89 private and public hospitals in France. From January 2005 to December 2010, 19,556 patients who underwent major lung resection (lobectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy) were included in our study. Multilevel logistic models were designed to investigate the relationship between 30-day mortality and surgeon (model 1) or hospital (model 2) volumes. The 3 levels considered were the patient, the surgeon, and the hospital.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2007, the 30-day mortality of patients who underwent major lung resection averaged 10%, and then decreased until it reached 3.8% in 2010 (P < .0001). A significant decrease in 30-day mortality was observed over time (P = .0046). During the study period, the mean annual number of procedures per surgeon was 46.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 23.6) and per hospital was 97.9 (SD = 50.8). Model 1 showed that surgeon volume had a significant impact on 30-day mortality (P = .03), whereas model 2 failed to show that hospital volume influenced 30-day mortality (P = .75).

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2007, when France's first National Cancer Plan became effective, 30-day mortality of primary lung cancer surgery has decreased and currently measures 3.8%. Low mortality was correlated with higher surgeon volume but was not influenced by hospital volume, which cannot be considered a proxy measure for determining the safety of lung cancer surgery.