Safety and efficacy of prothrombin complex concentrates for the treatment of coagulopathy after cardiac surgery

Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity as First-line Therapy for Coagulopathy in Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To compare the outcomes of factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) versus fresh frozen plasma (FFP) as the primary treatment for postoperative coagulopathy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A retrospective, propensity-matched study.

SETTING

A single, tertiary hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who underwent noncoronary cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 2015 and 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We stratified patients into 2 groups based on whether they received intraoperative FFP or FEIBA; cases using both were excluded. We analyzed 434 cases, with 197 receiving FFP and 237 receiving FEIBA. After propensity matching, there was no significant difference in the proportion of the patients who required packed red blood cell transfusions (p = 0.08). However, of those who required packed red blood cell transfusions, patients in the FEIBA group required significantly fewer units of packed red blood cells (p < 0.001). Significantly fewer patients in the FEIBA group required platelet (p < 0.001) and cryoprecipitate (p < 0.001) transfusions. The FEIBA group showed decreased prolonged postoperative intubation (p = 0.05), decreased intensive care unit length of stay (p = 0.04), and lower 30-day readmission rates (p = 0.03). There were no differences in the rates of thrombotic complications between the 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In the initial treatment of postcardiopulmonary bypass coagulopathy, FEIBA may be more effective than FFP in decreasing blood product transfusions and readmission rates. Further studies are needed to explore the potential routine use of FEIBA as first-line agent in this patient population.

Comparison of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate with Activated Factor VII Use for Bleeding Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Children

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in the treatment of bleeding complications following surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in children.

DESIGN/METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of a single institution comprising patients aged 0 to 18 years old with congenital heart disease. Patients must have received either PCC or rFVIIa after coming off CPB. Our primary efficacy endpoint is time in the operating room from off-CPB to pediatric intensive care unit admission. Our primary safety endpoint is thrombosis through 30 days.

RESULTS

Our primary efficacy outcome was significantly shorter in the PCC group compared with the rFVIIa group (P < .0001). Similarly, secondary efficacy outcomes of packed red blood cell administration, chest tube output, and transfusion exposures all significantly favored PCC administration. However, CPB time was significantly longer, and body temperatures were significantly lower, in the rFVIIa group. Safety outcomes, including our primary safety outcome of thrombosis through 30 days, were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study questions whether PCC could be favored over rFVIIa for hemostasis in children with congenital heart disease following CPB surgery. In addition, this study has found no difference when comparing PCC and rFVIIa in terms of safety outcomes, particularly thrombosis events. There are several limitations to this study due to the retrospective nature of the design and the differences between the two study groups. Despite the limitations, this study suggests that relatively early administration of PCC could be favored over delayed administration of rFVIIa to control recalcitrant post-CPB bleeding in the operating room.

Prothrombin complex concentrate in cardiac surgery for the treatment of coagulopathic bleeding

BACKGROUND

Coagulopathy following cardiac surgery is associated with considerable blood product transfusion and high morbidity and mortality. The treatment of coagulopathy following cardiac surgery is challenging, with the replacement of clotting factors being based on transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCCs) is an alternative method to replace clotting factors and warrants evaluation. PCCs are also an alternative method to treat refractory ongoing bleeding post-cardiac surgery compared to recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and also warrants evaluation.   OBJECTIVES: Assess the benefits and harms of PCCs in people undergoing cardiac surgery who have coagulopathic non-surgical bleeding.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) on the Web of Science on 20 April 2021. We searched Clinicaltrials.gov (www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov), and the World Health Organisation (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP; apps.who.int/trialsearch/), for ongoing or unpublished trials. We checked the reference lists for additional references. We did not limit the searches by language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised trials (NRSs).  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.   MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included  (4993 participants). Two were RCTs (151 participants) and 16 were NRSs. Both RCTs had low risk of bias (RoB) in almost all domains. Of the 16 NRSs, 14 were retrospective cohort analyses with one prospective study and one case report. The nine studies used in quantitative analysis were judged to have critical RoB, three serious and three moderate.   1. PCC versus standard treatment Evidence from RCTs showed PCCs are likely to reduce the number of units transfused compared to standard care (MD -0.89, 95% CI -1.78 to 0.00; participants = 151; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence). Evidence from NRSs agreed with this, showing that PCCs may reduce the mean number of units transfused compared to standard care but the evidence is uncertain (MD -1.87 units, 95% CI -2.53 to -1.20; participants = 551; studies = 2; very low-quality evidence). There was no evidence from RCTs showing a difference in the incidence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion compared to standard care (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.40; participants = 101; studies = 1; low-quality evidence). Evidence from NRSs disagreed with this, showing that PCCs may reduce the mean number of units transfused compared to standard care but the evidence is uncertain (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.98; participants = 1046; studies = 4; low-quality evidence). There was no evidence from RCTs showing a difference in the number of thrombotic events with PCC compared to standard care (OR 0.68 95% CI 0.20 to 2.31; participants = 152; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence). This is supported by NRSs, showing that PCCs may have no effect on the number of thrombotic events compared to standard care but the evidence is very uncertain (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.99; participants = 1359; studies = 7; very low-quality evidence). There was no evidence from RCTs showing a difference in mortality with PCC compared to standard care  (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.35; participants = 149; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence). This is supported by evidence from NRSs, showing that PCCs may have little to no effect on mortality compared to standard care but the evidence is very uncertain (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.51; participants = 1334; studies = 6; very low-quality evidence). Evidence from RCTs indicated that there was little to no difference in postoperative bleeding (MD -107.05 mLs, 95% CI -278.92 to 64.83; participants = 151, studies = 2; low-quality evidence).  PCCs may have little to no effect on intensive care length of stay (RCT evidence: MD -0.35 hours, 95% CI -19.26 to 18.57; participants = 151; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence) (NRS evidence: MD -18.00, 95% CI -43.14 to 7.14; participants = 225; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence) or incidence of renal replacement therapy (RCT evidence: OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.14 to 3.59; participants = 50; studies = 1; low-quality evidence) (NRS evidence: OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.98; participants = 684; studies = 2; very low-quality evidence). No studies reported on additional adverse outcomes.   2. PCC versus rFVIIa For this comparison, all evidence was provided from NRSs.  PCC likely results in a large reduction of RBCs transfused intra-operatively in comparison to rFVIIa (MD-4.98 units, 95% CI -6.37 to -3.59; participants = 256; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence).  PCC may have little to no effect on the incidence of RBC units transfused comparative to rFVIIa; evidence is very uncertain (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.56; participants = 150; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence). PCC may have little to no effect on the number of thrombotic events comparative to rFVIIa; evidence is very uncertain (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.16; participants = 407; studies = 4; very low-quality evidence). PCC may have little to no effect on the incidence of mortality (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.03; participants = 278; studies = 3; very low-quality evidence) or intensive care length of stay comparative to rFVIIa (MD -40 hours, 95% CI -110.41 to 30.41; participants = 106; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence); evidence is very uncertain . PCC may reduce bleeding (MD -674.34 mLs, 95% CI -906.04 to -442.64; participants = 150; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence) and incidence of renal replacement therapy (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.71; participants = 106; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence) comparative to rFVIIa; evidence is very uncertain. No studies reported on other adverse events.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PCCs could potentially be used as an alternative to standard therapy for coagulopathic bleeding post-cardiac surgery compared to FFP as shown by moderate-quality evidence and it may be an alternative to rFVIIa in refractory non-surgical bleeding but this is based on moderate to very low quality of evidence.

Factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity for refractory bleeding in coronary artery bypass grafting: A propensity-matched analysis

Background

Perioperative bleeding and transfusion have been associated with major morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. As concerns remain regarding potential graft thrombosis following administration of a prothrombin factor concentrate, the use of factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) in managing refractory postoperative bleeding has never been evaluated in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Objectives

We aimed to examine the safety of FEIBA in patients undergoing isolated CABG, with respect to 30-day mortality, perioperative outcomes, and thrombotic complications.

Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive patients who had undergone isolated on-pump CABG between January 2015 and December 2019 at North Shore University Hospital. Patients requiring intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups, dependent upon whether they received FEIBA (n = 63) versus no FEIBA (n = 2493). A 1:5 propensity match analysis was employed, and patients were analyzed with respect to thrombotic complications, reintervention for myocardial ischemia, and short-term clinical outcomes.

Results

There was no difference in 30-day mortality between the two cohorts. There was also no significant difference in a composite of thrombotic complications (composed of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and stroke) between the two groups. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the requirement for postoperative reintervention for myocardial ischemia between patients who received FEIBA versus those who did not.

Conclusions

Factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity may be safe when used as rescue therapy for refractory bleeding following isolated CABG.

Factor eight inhibiting bypass activity for refractory bleeding in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative bleeding and transfusion have been associated with adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. The use of factor eight inhibiting bypass activity (FEIBA) in managing bleeding after repair of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) has not previously been evaluated. We report our experience in utilizing FEIBA in ATAAD repair.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive patients who underwent repair of ATAAD between July 2014 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups, dependent upon whether or not they received FEIBA intraoperatively: "FEIBA" (n = 112) versus "no FEIBA" (n = 119). From this, 53 propensity-matched pairs of patients were analyzed with respect to transfusion requirements and short-term clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality for the entire cohort was 11.7% (27 deaths), not significantly different between patient groups. Those patients who received FEIBA demonstrated reduced transfusion requirements for all types of blood products in the first 48 h after surgery as compared with the "no FEIBA" cases, including red blood cells, platelets, plasma, and cryoprecipitate (p < .0001). There was no significant difference in major postoperative morbidity between the two groups. The FEIBA cohort did not demonstrate an increased incidence of thrombotic complications (stroke, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism).

DISCUSSION

When used as rescue therapy for refractory bleeding following repair of ATAAD, FEIBA appears to be effective in decreasing postoperative transfusion requirements whilst not negatively impacting clinical outcomes. These findings should prompt further investigation and validation via larger, multi-center, randomized trials.

Immediate Higher-Dose Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Without Fresh Frozen Plasma or Fibrinogen Concentrate for Significant Coagulopathic Cardiac Surgical Field Bleeding

BACKGROUND

Treatment of significant coagulopathic cardiac surgical field bleeding with immediate higher-dose prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) without fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or fibrinogen concentrate is unexplored.

AIMS

To study characteristics, chest drainage, and clinical outcomes of patients with significant coagulopathic surgical field bleeding treated with immediate higher-dose (defined at >15 IU/kg based on factor IX) PCC without FFP or fibrinogen concentrate.

METHODS

We screened sequential cardiac surgery patients. We reviewed electronic blood bank data, Australian Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery database information and anaesthetic, intensive care unit (ICU), ward and radiological charts and electronic data. We identified patients deemed by the operating surgeon to require treatment for significant coagulopathic surgical field bleeding who underwent immediate higher-dose PCC without FFP or fibrinogen concentrate.

RESULTS

Among 168 patients, we identified 30 who underwent immediate higher-dose PCC without FFP or fibrinogen concentrate. Median age was 68 years, 23 were male, 17 underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and three underwent complex surgery (David procedure, redo mitral valve surgery, and redo thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair). Median dose of PCC was 2,500 IU. In addition, 27% underwent platelets and one underwent cryoprecipitate. Chest drainage at 24 hours was 505 ml. Survival to hospital discharge was 100%. There were no cases of pulmonary embolism, stroke, or other thrombotic events. Stage 1 AKI occurred in one patient.

CONCLUSION

In a pilot cohort of patients with significant coagulopathic surgical field bleeding, immediate higher-dose PCC without FFP or fibrinogen concentrate was feasible and had an acceptable efficacy and safety profile, which justifies future controlled studies.

The use of FEIBA for refractory bleeding in cardiac surgery - a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Significant blood loss during cardiac surgery is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA), a hemostatic bypassing agent mainly used in hemophiliac patients, has also been used for intractable surgical bleeding during cardiac surgical procedures in non-hemophiliac patients. However, concerns exist that its use may be linked to increased incidence of perioperative adverse effects including thrombotic complications.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic literature search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for all studies that reported the administration of FEIBA for treatment of bleeding during adult cardiac surgery in non-hemophiliac patients. After selecting of title and abstracts, two authors assessed the methodological quality of the full-text articles prior to final inclusion in the manuscript.

EXPERT OPINION

The safety profile of FEIBA was determined through an aggregate count of adverse events. Major complications included renal failure, re-operation for unresolved bleeding, postoperative mortality, and thromboembolic events. Overall, there is insufficient robust evidence to make a definitive conclusion about the safety or efficacy of using of FEIBA as a hemostatic agent in the setting of cardiac surgery.

Efficacy of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) versus fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in reducing perioperative blood loss in cardiac surgery: study protocol for a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is not inferior to fresh frozen plasma (FFP) with regard to reducing perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

SETTING

Fu Wai Hospital, and Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement or valvuloplasty under CPB, between 18 and 80 years old, will be included.

DESIGN

This study is a non-inferiority, randomised controlled clinical trial. A total of 594 subjects will be randomly assigned to two groups (group PCC and group FFP) and given corresponding interventions when at least one of the following criteria is met: (1) international normalised ratio >1.7 measured 20 min after CPB, (2) prolonged prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time (>1.5 times baseline) measured 20 min after CPB and (3) excessive bleeding observed. 4-factor PCC (15 IU/kg) and FFP (10 mL/kg) will be given to group PCC and group FFP, respectively. Preoperative management, anaesthetic and surgical techniques will be standardised for both groups.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome is the volume of blood loss during and within 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes include (1) the total units of allogeneic red blood cells transfused during and within 7 days after surgery, (2) re-exploration due to postoperative bleeding within 7 days after surgery, (3) adverse events and serious adverse events within 30 days after surgery and (4) length of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Registered under NCT04244981 at ClinicalTrials.gov on 28 January 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04244981?cond=NCT04244981&draw=2&rank=1.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (ZS-2242).

Factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity (FEIBA) for the reduction of transfusion in cardiac surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled bleeding after cardiac surgery can be life-threatening. Factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) is a prothrombin complex concentrate empirically used as rescue therapy for correction of refractory bleeding diathesis post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). FEIBA used as rescue therapy for bleeding diathesis after CPB has been associated with a low incidence of complications and a reduction in transfusion requirement and re-exploration. The feasibility and efficacy of early administration of FEIBA after the termination of CPB have not been studied in a prospective randomized trial.

METHODS

We designed a small randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial to determine the feasibility of a larger trial testing the hypothesis that FEIBA decreases transfusion requirements after CPB. The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of a larger pivotal trial to determine the effectiveness of FEIBA in reducing the total volume of blood products transfused perioperatively, and its safety profile. Study participants were adult patients undergoing elective major aortic cardiovascular surgery at a tertiary referral hospital, who were equally randomized to receive a single dose of either FEIBA or matched placebo intraoperatively at the end of CPB.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were screened and 12 were randomized and included in the analysis. Protocol adherence was high, and all patients received the study drug per intention-to-treat except one patient. There were no protocol deviations or events of unblinding, and adverse events were not different between groups. Patients in the FEIBA group were older and more likely to be female and had higher BMI, lower hematocrit, and longer hypothermic circulatory arrest. There were no differences in post-randomization blood product transfusions (difference FEIBA vs. placebo -899 mL; 95% CI -5206 to 3409) or in the administration of open-label FEIBA.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot trial confirmed the adequacy of the trial design that involved the early, blinded administration of FEIBA, by demonstrating excellent protocol adherence. We conclude that a larger trial establishing the effectiveness of early prothrombin complex concentrate administration to reduce the use of blood products in the setting of high-risk cardiac surgery is feasible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02577614 . Registered 16 October 2015.

The Use of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypass Activity (FEIBA) for the Treatment of Perioperative Hemorrhage in Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) can be used to control bleeding following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation without increasing the 14-day composite thrombotic outcome of pump thrombus, ischemic cerebrovascular accidents, pulmonary embolism, and deep venous thrombosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred nineteen consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation (December 1, 2009 to December 30, 2018).

INTERVENTION

FEIBA administered to control perioperative hemorrhage.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The 82 patients (25.7%) in the FEIBA cohort had more risk factors for perioperative hemorrhage, such as lower preoperative platelet count (169 ± 66 v 194 ± 68 × 10³/mL, p = 0.004), prior cardiac surgery (36.6% v 21.9%, p = 0.008), and longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (100.3 v 75.2 minutes, p = 0.001) than the 237 controls. After 16.6 units (95% CI: 14.3-18.9) of blood products were given, 992 units (95% CI: 821-1163) of FEIBA were required to control bleeding in the FEIBA cohort. Compared to the controls, there were no differences in the 14-day composite thrombotic outcome (11.0% v 7.6%, p = 0.343) or mortality rate (3.7% v 1.3%, p = 0.179). Multivariate logistical regression identified preoperative international normalized ratio (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04-1.62) and CPB time (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.20) as risk factors for 14-day thrombotic events, but FEIBA usage was not associated with an increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort study, the use of FEIBA (∼1,000 units, ∼13 units/kg) to control perioperative hemorrhage following LVAD implantation was not associated with increases in mortality or composite thrombotic outcome.

Intraoperative prothrombin complex concentrate administration and outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) administration has increased among cardiac surgery patients in recent years; however, use in LVAD implantation/exchange is not widespread due to the fear of thrombotic complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing LVAD implantation/exchange with intraoperative PCC administration versus traditional transfusion practices alone. Adult LVAD implants/exchanges at our institution between 2015 and 2018 were included. Patients were categorized as receiving intraoperative PCC or no-PCC (traditional). The primary outcome was the need for allogenic transfusion and transfusion volume at 48 hours after initial intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included metrics of morbidity and mortality. A total of 160 patients (39 PCC, 121 traditional) were analyzed. In unadjusted analysis, patients in the PCC group received lower intraoperative transfusion volumes compared to the traditional group although not statistically significant (1464 mL [IQR 796, 4876] vs. 2568 mL [IQR 1292, 3606]; P value .37). In the fully adjusted analysis, patients in the PCC group had increased odds of transfusion within 48 hours of ICU admission (OR 4.06, 95% CI: 1.35-12.20; P < .01); however, there was no significant difference in transfusion volumes (P = .09). Patients receiving PCCs had higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (10.3% vs. 0%; P  < .01) and 30-day mortality (17.9% vs. 4.1%; P < .01). LVAD pump thrombosis occurred in 2.6% versus 0.8% in the PCC and traditional groups, respectively; P = .98. Patients undergoing LVAD implantation and exchange represent a complex surgical cohort. The results of this study suggest that the intraoperative PCC use during LVAD implant/exchange was associated with reduced intraoperative transfusions. Intraoperative PCC use was, however, associated with higher odds of postoperative transfusion, although transfusion volumes were not significantly different. While the deep vein thrombosis and 30-day mortality rates were higher in the PCC group, these results are likely related to the degree of surgical and patient complexity rather than PCC use itself. Further studies are needed to assess PCC use in this surgical cohort.

Transfusion Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Unifocalization and Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot With Major Aortopulmonary Collaterals

BACKGROUND

Surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot and major aortopulmonary collaterals (TOF/MAPCAs) involves unifocalization of MAPCAs and reconstruction of the pulmonary arterial circulation. Surgical and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times are long and suture lines are extensive. Maintaining patency of the newly anastomosed vessels while achieving hemostasis is important, and assessment of transfusion practices is critical to successful outcomes.

METHODS

Clinical, surgical, and transfusion data in patients with TOF/MAPCAs repaired at our institution (2013-2018) were reviewed. Types and volumes of blood products used in the perioperative period, in addition to the use of antifibrinolytics and/or procoagulants (factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity [FEIBA]; anti-inhibitor coagulant complex), were assessed. Outcome measures included days on mechanical ventilation (DOMV), postoperative intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LoS), and incidence of thrombosis.

RESULTS

Perioperative transfusion data from 279 patients were analyzed. Surgical (879 ± 175 minutes vs 684 ± 257 minutes) and CPB times (376 ± 124 minutes vs 234 ± 122 minutes) were longer in patients who received FEIBA than those who did not. Although the indexed volume of packed red blood cells (128.4 ± 82.2 mL/kg) and fresh frozen plasma (64.2 ± 41.1 mL/kg) was similar in patients who did and did not receive FEIBA, the amounts of cryoprecipitate (5.5 ± 5.2 mL/kg vs 5.8 ± 4.8 mL/kg) and platelets (19.5 ± 20.7 mL/kg vs 20.8 ± 13 mL/kg) transfused were more in those who did receive FEIBA.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative transfusion is an important component in the overall surgical and anesthetic management of patients with TOF/MAPCAs. The intraoperative use of FEIBA was not associated with a decrease in the amount of blood products transfused, DOMV, or LoS or with an increase in thrombotic complications.

Use of Factor VIIa and Anti-inhibitor Coagulant Complex in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative bleeding is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiac patients who undergo cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Pediatric patients are especially at risk for adverse effects of surgery and CPB on the coagulation system. This can result in bleeding, transfusions, and poor outcomes. Excessive bleeding unresponsive to blood products can warrant the off-label use of recombinant activated clotting factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and/or anti-inhibitor coagulant complex (FEIBA). Several studies have shown the utility in these agents off-label in patients who have undergone cardiac bypass surgery with acute bleeding episodes that are refractory to blood products. However, data regarding use of these agents in pediatrics are sparse. The purpose of this study is to report the use of rFVIIa and FEIBA in pediatric cardiac surgery patients in our institution.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of pediatric cardiothoracic surgery patients who received rFVIIa or FEIBA at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta during the study period.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients received rFVIIa and 9 patients received FEIBA either intraoperatively or postoperatively for bleeding related to the cardiac procedure. Approximately 13% of rFVIIa patients and 55% of FEIBA patients required repeat doses. There were decreases for all blood products administered after rFVIIa and FEIBA were given. However, the doses used did not correlate with either positive or negative outcomes. Seventeen percent (n = 7) of rFVIIa patients experienced a thrombus and 22% (n = 2) of FEIBA patients experienced a thrombus.

CONCLUSIONS

Both rFVIIa and FEIBA reduced blood product usage in pediatric patients following cardiac procedures.

Prevention of Pulmonary and Venous Thromboembolism Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery - Literature Review

Objective

The current review evaluates recent literature on the different aspects of prophylaxis in postoperative pulmonary and venous thromboembolism and their main risk factors.

Methods

The literature survey was carried out based on the PubMed data using the keywords “coronary artery bypass graft” and “venous thromboembolism” as components of the search field title.

Results

Studies reported several risk factors for postoperative thromboembolism including advanced age, postoperative immobilization, type of thromboprophylaxis, obesity, and location of the surgery.

Conclusion

According to the studies, tailored prophylaxis could be easily adapted to decrease the intensity and duration of postoperative thromboembolism in a patient with several disorders and comorbidities, especially in cardiovascular disease.

Three-factor prothrombin complex concentrates for refractory bleeding after cardiovascular surgery within an algorithmic approach to haemostasis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) are increasingly administered off-label in the United States to treat bleeding in cardiovascular surgical patients and carry the potential risk for acquired thromboembolic side-effects after surgery. Therefore, we hypothesized that the use of low-dose 3-factor (3F) PCC (20-30 IU/kg), as part of a transfusion algorithm, reduces bleeding without increasing postoperative thrombotic/thromboembolic complications.

MATERIALS/METHODS

After IRB approval, we retrospectively analysed 114 consecutive, complex cardiovascular surgical patients (age > 18 years), between February 2014 and June 2015, that received low-dose 3F-PCC (Profilnine^® ), of which seven patients met established exclusion criteria. PCC was dosed according to an institutional perioperative algorithm. Allogeneic transfusions were recorded before and after PCC administration (n = 107). The incidence of postoperative thromboembolic events was determined within 30 days of surgery, and Factor II levels were measured in a subset of patients (n = 20) as a quality control measure to avoid excessive PCC dosing.

RESULTS

Total allogeneic blood product transfusion reached a mean of 12·4 ± 9·9 units before PCC and 5·0 ± 6·3 units after PCC administration (P < 0·001). The mean PCC dose was 15·8 ± 7·1 IU/kg. Four patients (3·8%) each experienced an ischaemic stroke on postoperative day 1, 2, 4 and 27. Seven patients (6·5%) had acquired venous thromboembolic disease within 10 days of surgery. Median factor II level after transfusion algorithm adherence and PCC administration was 87%.

CONCLUSIONS

3F-PCC use for refractory bleeding after cardiovascular surgery resulted in reduced transfusion of allogeneic blood and blood products. Adherence to this algorithmic approach was associated with an acceptable incidence of postoperative thrombotic/thromboembolic complications.

Utility of prothrombin complex concentrate as first-line treatment modality of coagulopathy in patients undergoing liver transplantation: A propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Transfusion management during liver transplantation (LT) is aimed at reducing blood loss and allogeneic transfusion requirements. Although prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) has been used satisfactorily in various bleeding disorders, studies on its safety, and efficacy during LT are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent living donor LT at a single institute between October 2016 and January 2018 was carried out. The safety and efficacy of PCC in reducing transfusion requirements intraoperatively in patients who received PCC were compared with patients who did not receive PCC. A propensity score-matching technique was used, at a 1:1 ratio, to remove selection bias.

RESULTS

After completing the 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis, 60 pairs of patients were identified. The use of PCC was associated with significantly decreased red blood cell transfusion requirements (6.2 ± 4.1 vs 8.23 ± 5.18, P < 0.001) and fresh frozen plasma transfusion requirements (2.6 ± 2 vs 6.18 ± 4.1, P < 0.001). The number of patients developing postoperative hemorrhagic complications was higher in the non-PCC group.

CONCLUSIONS

During LT, the use of PCC led to decreased transfusion requirements. No thromboembolic complications related to PCC were noted in this series.

Activated Factor 7 Versus 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Critical Bleeding Post–Cardiac Surgery

Background: Recombinant and plasma-derived factor products, such as activated factor seven (rFVIIa) and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-factor PCC), have been used off-label for bleeding after cardiac surgery, but little evidence has been published regarding their efficacy and safety. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in chest tube output in patients who have received 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa for critical postoperative bleeding associated with cardiovascular surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted utilizing the electronic medical record system at a 657-bed community, tertiary care hospital in Nashville, Tennessee. Nonpregnant patients ≥18 years of age experiencing significant bleeding during cardiac surgery who received either PCC or rFVIIa perioperatively or postoperatively between April 2015 through December 2016 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa for any indication other than bleeding during cardiac surgery or if they received both agents. Results: Data conclude that there is no significant difference in chest tube output 24 hours postoperatively between patients treated with 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa. There was no difference in bleeding, thromboembolic events, or re-exploration between the rFVIIa and 4-factor PCC groups, but there was a difference in units of fresh frozen plasma administered and hospital length of stay. Conclusion: 4-Factor PCC may be an equally efficacious alternative to rFVIIa for patients experiencing significant bleeding during cardiac surgery. There is no difference in chest tube output; therefore, there is no difference in bleeding—either at 24 hours postoperatively or total.

Perioperative Coagulation Management of a Hemophilia A Patient During Cardiac Surgery

Perioperative management of cardiovascular surgical procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with hemophilia A poses a clinical challenge in coagulation management. Use of CPB requires the administration of an anticoagulant, usually unfractionated heparin, and also causes dilutional coagulopathy, platelet dysfunction or platelet consumption coagulopathy. Hypothermia and activation of the inflammatory cascade also affect coagulation. The effects of CPB on circulating levels of factor VIII have not been clearly defined. In this review, the effects of CPB and hemodilution on FVIII are shown in a case presentation, and perioperative laboratory testing in patients with hemophilia A having cardiac surgery is discussed along with perioperative and postoperative coagulation management.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrates for Bleeding in the Perioperative Setting

Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) contain vitamin K-dependent clotting factors (II, VII, IX, and X) and are marketed as 3 or 4 factor-PCC formulations depending on the concentrations of factor VII. PCCs rapidly restore deficient coagulation factor concentrations to achieve hemostasis, but like with all procoagulants, the effect is balanced against thromboembolic risk. The latter is dependent on both the dose of PCCs and the individual patient prothrombotic predisposition. PCCs are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the reversal of vitamin K antagonists in the setting of coagulopathy or bleeding and, therefore, can be administered when urgent surgery is required in patients taking warfarin. However, there is growing experience with the off-label use of PCCs to treat patients with surgical coagulopathic bleeding. Despite their increasing use, there are limited prospective data related to the safety, efficacy, and dosing of PCCs for this indication. PCC administration in the perioperative setting may be tailored to the individual patient based on the laboratory and clinical variables, including point-of-care coagulation testing, to balance hemostatic benefits while minimizing the prothrombotic risk. Importantly, in patients with perioperative bleeding, other considerations should include treating additional sources of coagulopathy such as hypofibrinogenemia, thrombocytopenia, and platelet disorders or surgical sources of bleeding. Thromboembolic risk from excessive PCC dosing may be present well into the postoperative period after hemostasis is achieved owing to the relatively long half-life of prothrombin (factor II, 60-72 hours). The integration of PCCs into comprehensive perioperative coagulation treatment algorithms for refractory bleeding is increasingly reported, but further studies are needed to better evaluate the safe and effective administration of these factor concentrates.

Optimizing Thrombin Generation with 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrates in Neonatal Plasma After Cardiopulmonary Bypass

BACKGROUND

Bleeding is a serious complication after pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) that is associated with an increase in perioperative morbidity and mortality. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) have been used off-label to supplement transfusion protocols for bleeding after CPB in adults; however, data on their use in neonates are limited. In this study, we hypothesized that 4F-PCCs administered ex vivo to neonatal plasma after CPB will increase thrombin generation.

METHODS

Fifteen neonates undergoing complex cardiac repairs requiring CPB were enrolled in this prospective study. Arterial blood was obtained after anesthesia induction but before CPB (baseline), after CPB following heparin reversal, and after our standardized transfusion of a quarter of a platelet apheresis unit (approximately 20 mL·kg) and 3 units of cryoprecipitate. Kcentra (CSL Behring), a 4F-PCC with nonactivated factor VII (FVII), and factor 8 inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA; Baxter Healthcare Corporation), a 4F-PCC with activated FVII, were added ex vivo to plasma obtained after CPB to yield concentrations of 0.1 and 0.3 IU·mL. Calibrated automated thrombography was used to determine thrombin generation for each sample.

RESULTS

The addition of Kcentra to plasma obtained after CPB resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the median (99% confidence interval) peak amount of thrombin generation (42.0 [28.7-50.7] nM for Kcentra 0.1 IU·mL and 113.9 [99.0-142.1] nM for Kcentra 0.3 IU·mL). The rate of thrombin generation was also increased (15.4 [6.5-24.6] nM·min for Kcentra 0.1 IU·mL and 48.6 [29.9-66.6] nM·min for Kcentra 0.3 IU·mL). The same was true for FEIBA (increase in peak: 39.8 [27.5-49.2] nM for FEIBA 0.1 IU·mL and 104.6 [92.7-124.4] nM for FEIBA 0.3 IU·mL; increase in rate: 17.4 [7.4-28.8] nM·min FEIBA 0.1 IU·mL and 50.5 [26.7- 63.1] nM·min FEIBA 0.3 IU·mL). In the posttransfusion samples, there was a significant increase with Kcentra in the median (99% confidence interval) peak amount (41.1 [21.0-59.7] nM for Kcentra 0.1 IU·mL and 126.8 [106.6- 137.9] nM for Kcentra 0.3 IU·mL) and rate (18.1 [-6.2 to 29.2] nM·min for Kcentra 0.1 IU·mL and 53.2 [28.2-83.1] nM·min for Kcentra 0.3 IU·mL) of thrombin generation. Again, the results were similar for FEIBA (increase in peak: 43.0 [36.4-56.7] nM for FEIBA 0.1 IU·mL and 109.2 [90.3-136.1] nM for FEIBA 0.3 IU·mL; increase in rate: 25.0 [9.1-32.6] nM·min for FEIBA 0.1 IU·mL and 59.7 [38.5-68.7] nM·min for FEIBA 0.3 IU·mL). However, FEIBA produced in a greater median reduction in lag time of thrombin generation versus Kcentra in samples obtained after CPB (P = 0.003 and P = 0.0002 for FEIBA versus Kcentra at 0.1 and 0.3 IU·mL, respectively) and in samples obtained after transfusion (P < 0.0001 for FEIBA versus Kcentra at 0.1 and 0.3 IU·mL).

CONCLUSIONS

After CPB, thrombin generation in neonatal plasma was augmented by the addition of 4F-PCCs. The peak amount and rate of thrombin generation were enhanced in all conditions, whereas the lag time was shortened more with FEIBA. Our findings suggest that the use of 4F-PCCs containing activated FVII may be an effective adjunct to the initial transfusion of platelets and cryoprecipitate to augment coagulation and control bleeding in neonates after CPB.

Routine transfusion of platelet concentrates effectively reduces reoperation rate for bleeding and pericardial effusion after elective operations for ascending aortic aneurysm

Patients with ascending aortic aneurysm undergoing complex surgical procedures are at increased risk of early postoperative excessive blood loss. The aim of this study was to analyze safety and efficacy of routine transfusions of platelet (PLT) concentrates in reduction of hemorrhagic postoperative complications. The study involved 396 consecutive patients (289 males and 107 females) with the mean age of 55.9 ± 13.6 years who underwent elective operations for aortic aneurysms. They were divided retrospectively into two groups, without (group A; n = 123) or with the routine use of PLTs (group B; n = 273). PLTs were transfused intraoperatively just after completion of cardiopulmonary bypass. Twelve patients in group A (9.8%) and 10 (3.7%) in group B required re-thoracotomy due to hemorrhage (p = 0.027). Routine transfusions of PLT concentrates reduced postoperative incidence of excessive pericardial effusion from 24.1% in group A to 2.1% in group B (p = 0.002). In a consequence, significantly less units (p < 0.0001) of red blood concentrates and fresh frozen plasma were transfused in group B than in group A. The rates of other adverse events in the early postoperative period did not differ between groups. Patients with pericardial effusion required 6.3 ± 2.7 additional days of hospitalization due to surgical re-intervention. Neither blood transfusion-related infections nor adverse reactions were noted. In conclusion, routine intraoperative transfusions of PLT concentrates in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms significantly reduced a need for re-intervention due to both early bleeding and late cardiac tamponade.

Safety and efficacy of prothrombin complex concentrate as first-line treatment in bleeding after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Bleeding after cardiac surgery requiring surgical reexploration and blood component transfusion is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) has been used satisfactorily in bleeding disorders, studies on its efficacy and safety after cardiopulmonary bypass are limited.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and December 2013, 3454 consecutive cardiac surgery patients were included in an observational study aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of PCC as first-line coagulopathy treatment as a replacement for fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Starting in January 2012, PCC was introduced as solely first-line treatment for bleeding following cardiac surgery.

RESULTS

After one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis, 225 pairs of patients receiving PCC (median dose 1500 IU) and FFP (median dose 2 U) were included. The use of PCC was associated with significantly decreased 24-h post-operative blood loss (836 ± 1226 vs. 935 ± 583 ml, p < 0.0001). Propensity score-adjusted multivariate analysis showed that PCC was associated with significantly lower risk of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.80), decreased amount of RBC units (β unstandardised coefficient -1.42, 95% CI -2.06 to -0.77) and decreased risk of transfusion of more than 2 RBC units (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.73). Patients receiving PCC had an increased risk of post-operative acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02-2.05) and renal replacement therapy (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.13-9.90). Hospital mortality was unaffected by PCC (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.84-2.72).

CONCLUSIONS

In the cardiac surgery setting, the use of PCC compared with FFP was associated with decreased post-operative blood loss and RBC transfusion requirements. However, PCC administration may be associated with a higher risk of post-operative AKI.

Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Benefits and Risks of Thromboprophylaxis After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Optimal thromboprophylaxis after cardiac surgery is uncertain. This systematic review aimed to define the incidence and risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), fatal and nonfatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and assess whether venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis was effective in reducing VTE without complications after cardiac surgery.

Methods and Results

Two reviewers independently searched and assessed the quality and outcomes of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on VTE after cardiac surgery in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane controlled trial register (1966 to December 2014). Sixty‐eight studies provided data on VTE outcomes or complications related to thromboprophylaxis after cardiac surgery. The majority of the studies were observational studies (n=49), 16 studies were RCTs, and 3 were meta‐analyses. VTE prophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of PE (relative risk [RR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–0.72; P=0.0008) or symptomatic VTE (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28–0.71; P=0.0006) compared to the control without significant heterogeneity. Median incidence (interquartile range) of symptomatic DVT, PE, and fatal PE were 3.2% (0.6–8.1), 0.6% (0.3–2.9), and 0.3% (0.08–1.7), respectively. Previous history of VTE, obesity, left or right ventricular failure, and prolonged bed rest, mechanical ventilation, or use of a central venous catheter were common risk factors for VTE. Bleeding or cardiac tamponade requiring reoperation owing to pharmacological VTE prophylaxis alone, without systemic anticoagulation, was not observed.

Conclusions

Unless proven otherwise by adequately powered RCTs, initiating pharmacological VTE prophylaxis as soon as possible after cardiac surgery for patients who have no active bleeding is highly recommended.

Early postoperative management of heart transplant recipients with current ventricular assist device support in Japan: experience from a single center

PURPOSE

This study reviews our experience with the perioperative management of heart transplant (HT) recipients and explores how prior ventricular assist device (VAD) support affects the requirements for postoperative mechanical ventilation and circulatory support.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective database review was performed from 2007 to 2014. Early postoperative outcomes were compared between VAD and non-VAD groups. Forty-four patients were studied. The mean age was 38 ± 13 years, 30% were female, and 88% experienced non-ischemic heart failure. Forty patients (91%) required VAD support at the time of HT, with a mean duration of 864 ± 351 days. The median postoperative mechanical ventilation times in the VAD and non-VAD groups were 54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 42.9-297.3] and 15 (95% CI 4.8-30.0; p = 0.0199) hours, respectively. The VAD group experienced increased bleeding during the first 48 h after HT (6.7 ± 3.5 vs. 1.8 ± 0.75 l, p = 0.004). Mechanical circulatory support with intra-aortic balloon pumping or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was required in 30% of VAD group patients. Increased bleeding and primary graft failure were the main causes of prolonged mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

HT recipients with VAD support required longer mechanical ventilation periods and mechanical circulatory support in the postoperative period.

Pretransplant coagulopathy and in-hospital outcomes among heart transplant recipients: a propensity-matched nationwide inpatient sample study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and contemporary trends of pre-heart transplantation (HT) coagulopathy and associated clinical outcomes have not been studied from a national database.

HYPOTHESIS

Pre-HT coagulopathy is associated with increased in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

Among 2454 adult HT recipients from the 2003 to 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases, 707 (29%) had pre-HT coagulopathy (defined as a comorbidity variable, based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninthe Revision, Clinical Modification and Diagnosis Related Group codes). We used propensity scores for coagulopathy to assemble a matched cohort of 664 pairs of patients with and without coagulopathy balanced in 54 baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pre-HT coagulopathy increased from 17% in 2003 to 44% in 2010 (P for trend <0.001). In-hospital mortality occurred in 8.6% and 4.7% of matched HT recipients with and without coagulopathy, respectively (hazard ratio: 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-2.80; P = 0.008). Coagulopathy was not significantly associated with post-HT graft complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.95-1.52; P = 0.131) but was associated with increased blood transfusions (OR: 1.92; 95% CI, 1.54-2.41; P < 0.001). Coagulopathy and no-coagulopathy groups had no difference in median length of stay (22 days in each group, P = 0.746), but median total hospital charges were higher among patients with coagulopathy compared to those without (US$425 643 vs US$389 656; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In this national study of HT recipients, pretransplant coagulopathy was common, increased over time, and was not significantly associated with post-HT graft complications or increased hospital stay. However, it was associated with increased bleeding risk, in-hospital mortality, and total hospital charges. These findings may have implications for the selection of patients for HT.

Haemostatic management for aortic valve replacement in a patient with advanced liver disease

Redo-sternotomy and aortic valve replacement in patients with advanced liver disease is rare and associated with a prohibitive morbidity and mortality. Refractory coagulopathy is common and a consequence of intense activation of the coagulation system that can be triggered by contact of blood with the cardiopulmonary bypass circuitry, bypass-induced fibrinolysis, platelet activation and dysfunction, haemodilution, surgical trauma, hepatic decompensation and hypothermia. Management can be further complicated by right heart dysfunction, porto-pulmonary hypertension, poor myocardial protection, and hepato-renal syndrome. Complex interactions between coagulation/fibrinolysis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome reactions like “post-perfusion-syndrome” also compound haemostatic failure. Given the limited information available for the specific management and prevention of cardiopulmonary bypass-induced haemostatic failure, this report serves to guide the anaesthesia and medical management of future cases of a similar kind. We discuss our multimodal management of haemostatic failure using pharmacological strategies, thromboelastography, continuous cerebral and liver oximetry, and continuous cardiac output monitoring.