Multiple arterial grafts improve survival with coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary interventions

Assessing the benefits of anaortic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Introduction

The procedure called the "aorta no-touch" (NT) or anaortic technique in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is designed to reduce the perioperative risk of stroke. We have observed an increased frequency of anaortic OPCAB procedures at our institution. The main purpose of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of anaortic OPCAB in reducing the perioperative risk of stroke.

Methods

From April 2011 to July 2023, a total of 2,236 patients underwent isolated OPCAB at our single center. The patients were divided into the anaortic group (NT, n = 762) and the aortic group (A, n = 1,474). The NT group was propensity score-matched (PSM) with the A group at a 1:1 ratio (NT n = 640; A n = 640), and matching was performed based on 26 covariates with preoperative clinical characteristics.

Results

In both the unmatched and matched cohorts of the NT and A groups, there were no significant differences observed in new stroke rates (NT vs. A; unmatched, 1.0% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.624; matched, 0.9% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.789). The univariable logistic analysis did not identify the anaortic technique as an independent factor negatively associated with new stroke events (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.35-1.86, p = 0.624).

Conclusion

The present study did not find the anaortic technique to reduce the perioperative risk of stroke in OPCAB. Hence, further large studies are needed to identify patient cohorts in which anaortic OPCAB is significantly beneficial.

Effect of right internal mammary artery versus radial artery as a second graft vessel in coronary artery bypass grafting on postoperative wound infection in patients: A meta-analysis

Few studies have shown that radial artery (RA), which is used as a secondary arterial graft, offers superior results compared with right internal thoracic artery (RIMA) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In a meta-analysis of observational studies starting in 2023, we looked at the effect of re-operation on postoperative infection and haemorrhage in CABG with RA vs. RIMA. The electronic database up to October 2023 was examined in the course of the research. Analysis was carried out on the clinical trials of postoperative wound infections and haemorrhage re-surgery. Among 912 trials associated with CABG, we selected 8 trials to be included in the final data analysis. The main results were secondary wound infection and re-operation after surgery. The odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CIs) were computed on the basis of a randomized or fixed-effect model of wound infection and re-operation. Seven trials showed a significant reduction in the risk of wound infection in RA treated as a secondary artery transplant compared with RIMA (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03, 2.47 p = 0.04); Four trials showed that RIMA was not significantly different from RA in the rate of re-operation for postoperative bleeding (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.60, 2.88 p = 0.50). In CABG, RA is used as a secondary arterial conduit graft to lower the risk of wound infection in CABG patients.

Multiple arterial coronary bypass grafting is associated with better survival compared with second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the long-term outcomes of multiarterial graft (MAG) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) to treat stable multivessel coronary artery disease.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter population-based retrospective analysis of all residents of Ontario, Canada, from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. We identified 3600 cases of elective primary isolated CABG with MAG and 2187 cases of PCI with second-generation DES.

RESULTS

After the application of propensity score-weighting using overlap weights, MAG was associated with better survival over 5 years compared with DES (96.8% vs 94.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.85). MAG was also associated with better secondary outcomes including a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (94.3% vs 88.5%; HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.65). The rate of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization (91.2% vs 70.7%; HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.20-0.30), and the individual end points of myocardial infarction (1.4% vs 6.9%; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.13-0.35), and repeat revascularization (4.1% vs 24.2%; HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.10-0.18) were lower with MAG. PCI with second-generation DES was associated with a lower rate of stroke up to 5 years (0.6% vs 1.8%; HR, 3.97; 95% CI, 1.45-10.88).

CONCLUSIONS

CABG with MAG was associated with better survival and fewer major cardiac adverse events compared with second-generation DES and might be considered the treatment of choice for patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Survival and Independent Predictors of Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in a Single-Unit Practice in the United Kingdom Over 20 Years

BACKGROUND

 The types of graft conduits and surgical techniques may impact the long-term outcomes of patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) revascularization. This study observed a long-term survival rate following CABG surgery over 20 years in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

 A total of 2979 isolated CABG patients were studied from 1999 to 2020, and postoperative data were obtained from the hospital-recorded mortality by the data quality team of the information department. Postdischarge survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was obtained with log-rank tests and the Gehan-Breslow test, and the Holm-Sidak method was used for multiple pairwise comparisons.

RESULTS

 The study observed male predominance (80%), and the median age was statistically significant (P <0.001) among the groups, 66 years (interquartile range 58-73) and 72 years (interquartile range 66-78) in survivor and non-survivor groups, respectively. In the Holm-Sidak method analysis, the best survival rate (mean 18.7 years) was observed in the total arterial group with significantly decreased survival for the mixed arterial and venous group (mean 16.12 years) and only the vein group (10.44 years). The Cox regression model observed that the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV (HR 1.57), chest re-exploration (HR 2.14), preoperative dialysis (HR 3.13), and redo surgery (HR 3.04) were potential predictors of the postoperative mortality (P ≤0.05).

CONCLUSION

 In our series over 20 years, albeit off-pump and on-pump CABG observed similar survival rates, the total arterial myocardial revascularization population has significantly better long-term survival benefits.

Single or multiple arterial bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare long-term all-cause mortality between patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using multiple (MAG) or single arterial grafting (SAG).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The current study is a post hoc analysis of the SYNTAX Extended Survival Study, which compared PCI with CABG in patients with three-vessel (3VD) and/or left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and evaluated survival with ≥10 years of follow-up. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at maximum follow-up (median 11.9 years) assessed in the as-treated population. Of the 1743 patients, 901 (51.7%) underwent PCI, 532 (30.5%) received SAG, and 310 (17.8%) had MAG. At maximum follow-up, all-cause death occurred in 305 (33.9%), 175 (32.9%), and 70 (22.6%) patients in the PCI, SAG, and MAG groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Multiple arterial grafting [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.89], but not SAG (adjusted HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67-1.03), was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with PCI. In patients with 3VD, both MAG (adjusted HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.81) and SAG (adjusted HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.91) were associated with significantly lower mortality than PCI, whereas in LMCAD patients, no significant differences between PCI and MAG (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.56-1.46) or SAG (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.81-1.53) were observed. In patients with revascularization of all three major myocardial territories, a positive correlation was observed between the number of myocardial territories receiving arterial grafts and survival (Ptrend = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that MAG might be the more desirable configuration for CABG to achieve lower long-term all-cause mortality than PCI in patients with 3VD and/or LMCAD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on clinicaltrial.gov. SYNTAXES: NCT03417050 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03417050); SYNTAX: NCT00114972 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00114972).

Survival effect of radial artery usage in addition to bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafting: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Little evidence shows whether the radial artery (RA) as third arterial graft provides superior outcomes compared with the use of the bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) and saphenous vein (SV) graft in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. A meta-analysis of propensity score-matched observational studies that compared the long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of BITA and the RA (BITA + RA) versus BITA and SV (BITA + SV) was performed.

METHODS

Electronic databases from January 2000 to November 2020 were screened. Studies that reported long-term mortality were analyzed. The primary outcome was long-term overall mortality. A secondary end point was in-hospital/30-day mortality. Pooled hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for survival and time-to-event analysis according to a random effect model. Differences were expressed as odds ratio with 95% CI for in-hospital/30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Six propensity score-matched studies that reported on 2500 matched patients (BITA + RA: 1250; BITA + SV: 1250) were identified for comparison. The use of BITA + RA was not statistically associated with early mortality (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.36-2.28; P = .83). The mean follow-up time ranged from 7.5 to 12 years. The pooled analysis of long-term survival revealed a significant difference between the 2 groups favoring BITA + RA treatment (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91; P = .031). The survival rate for BITA + RA versus BITA + SV at 5, 10, and 15 years were: 96.2% versus 94.8%, 88.9% versus 87.4%, and 83% versus 77.9%, respectively (log rank test, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, BITA + RA usage is not associated with higher rates of operative risk and is associated with superior long-term overall survival.

The impact of the radial artery or the saphenous vein in addition to the bilateral internal mammary arteries on late survival: A propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival benefits of full arterial revascularization with radial artery (RA) used in addition to bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) compared with saphenous vein (SV) used in addition to BIMA has not been clearly defined.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 660 3-vessel coronary artery disease subjects who received BIMA in addition to either RA (n = 206) or SV (n = 454) grafting in a period between June 1999 and November 2017. After propensity score matching, we obtained 190 matched pairs for analysis.

RESULTS

In the matched population, in-hospital mortality occurred in 4 patients (1%), with 2 deaths (1.1%) in the BIMA + RA group and 2 deaths (1.1%) in BIMA + SV group (P > .99). The median follow-up time was 9.2 years (interquartile range, 5.6-13 years) with a maximum follow-up time of 18.5 years. There was not a significant difference in long-term survival between the 2 groups over the follow-up period. Survival at 5, 10, and 15 years were 94.8 ± 1.7%, 83.7 ± 3.1%, and 78.6 ± 3.9% in the BIMA + RA group and 96.2 ± 1.4%, 85.1 ± 2.9%, and 80.4 ± 3.6% in the BIMA + SV group (stratified log-rank P = .78). Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate that the use of RA in addition to BIMA did not affect the late mortality (propensity score adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.79; P = .83).

CONCLUSIONS

In a relatively small population of triple-vessel coronary artery disease, the use of RA as a third arterial conduit with BIMA did not confer a long-term survival benefit.

Differential Signature of Obesity in the Relationship with Acute Kidney Injury and Mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Obesity is related to several comorbidities and mortality, but its relationship with acute kidney injury (AKI) and long-term mortality remain undetermined in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Data from 3,018 patients (age ≥ 18 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery from two tertiary referral centers were retrospectively reviewed between 2004 and 2015. Obesity was defined using the body mass index, according to the World Health Organization's recommendation. The odds and hazard ratios in post-surgical, AKI, and all-cause mortality were calculated after adjustment for multiple covariates. Patients were followed for 90 ± 40.9 months (maximum: 13 years).

RESULTS

Among the cohort, 37.4%, 2.4%, 21.1%, 35.1%, and 4.0% of patients were classified as normal weight, underweight, overweight-at-risk, obese I, and obese II, respectively. Post-surgical AKI developed in 799 patients (26.5%). Patients in the obese groups (overweight-at-risk to obese II) had a higher risk of AKI than did those in the normal-weight group. During the follow-up period, 787 patients (26.1%) died. Underweight patients had a higher risk of mortality than did normal-weight patients, whereas overweight-at-risk, obese I, and obese II patients showed better survival rates.

CONCLUSION

After coronary artery bypass graft surgery, obese patients encountered a high risk of AKI, and underweight patients exhibited a low chance of survival. Awareness of both obese and underweight statuses should be raised in these patients.

Challenges with Evidence-Based Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is a highly prevalent condition associated with increased costs, morbidity, and mortality. Management goals of SIHD can broadly be thought of in terms of improving prognosis and/or improving symptoms. Treatment options include medical therapy as well as revascularization, either with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. Herein, we will review the current evidence base for treatment of SIHD as well as its challenges and discuss ongoing studies to help address some of these knowledge gaps.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been no consistent reduction in death or myocardial infarction (MI) with revascularization vs. medical therapy in patients with SIHD in contemporary trials. Angina and quality of life have been shown to be relieved more rapidly with revascularization vs. optimal medical therapy; however, the durability of these results is uncertain. There have been challenges and limitations in several of the trials addressing the optimal treatment strategy for SIHD due to potential selection bias (due to knowledge of coronary anatomy prior to randomization), patient crossover, and advances in medical therapy and revascularization strategies since trial completion. The challenges inherent to prior trials addressing the optimal management strategy for SIHD have impacted the generalizability of results to real-world cohorts. Until the results of additional ongoing trials are available, the decision for revascularization or medical therapy should be based on patients' symptoms, weighing the risks and benefits of each approach, and patient preference.

The Surgical Treatment of Coronary Artery Occlusive Disease: Modern Treatment Strategies for an Age Old Problem

Coronary artery disease remains a formidable challenge to clinicians. Percutaneous interventions and surgical techniques for myocardial revascularization continue to improve. Concurrently, in light of emerging data, multiple practice guidelines have been published guiding clinicians in their therapeutic decisions. The multidisciplinary Heart Team concept needs to be embraced by all cardiovascular providers to optimize patient outcomes.