Longer-term results, z scores, and decision nomograms for treatment of the ascending aorta in 1693 bicuspid aortic valve operations

Selective sinus replacement for aortic root repair in bicuspid aortopathy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the results after selective sinus replacement (SSR) for aortic root remodeling in bicuspid aortopathy.

METHODS

Among 662 patients who underwent root repair using SSR between 2005 and 2020, there were 114 with bicuspid aortopathy. SSR was performed either as an isolated procedure (31) or as an adjunct to aortic valve repair (83) and was adjusted to the existing aortic annulus diameter rather than a downsized diameter. In valves with asymmetrical commissural orientation, the repair aimed for the achievement of a 180°-commissural orientation.

RESULTS

Abolishment of aortic insufficiency (AI) ≥2+ using root repair alone was only possible in 2 patients with acute-dissection-related AI, yet isolated root repair was also performed in 29 further patients with no/mild AI. All remaining patients with AI ≥2+ presented cusp-related regurgitation and necessitated an additional valve repair. During the mean follow-up of 91 months (range, 13-196), a relevant valve defect (AI ≥3+ in 8, stenosis in 2) occurred in 10 patients (all after combined repair) resulting in an estimated freedom from a relevant aortic valve defect and/or reoperation of 96 ± 2%, 89 ± 4%, and 82 ± 6% at 5, 10, and 12 years, respectively. Echocardiographically, no patient revealed a considerable change of form or size of the repaired root nor was any root reintervention necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-tailored root repair using SSR is a very effective and durable valve-sparing approach for bicuspid aortopathy. Aortic cusp repair is decisive for both abolishment of AI in bicuspid aortopathy and for the functional durability of the repaired aortic valve.

Adolescents with bicuspid aortic valve: Which criteria should we use for aortic dilatation?

BACKGROUND

Criteria to define aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients are different for children and adults. The objective of this study was to find the best reference tool to define dilation of the aortic root (AR) and the ascending aorta (AA) in BAV adolescents with an adult body surface area (BSA).

METHODS

Patients recruited were ≥10-years-old with a BSA ≥1.5 m2. Three measurements of the AR and AA were compared: z-score, the BSA-indexed value (BSA-IV) and the absolute value (AV), with thresholds in +2/+3, 21 mm/m2 and 40 mm, respectively.

RESULTS

231 subjects were collected from the Pediatric REVAB database, with a median age and BSA of 14-year-old and 1.67 m2. Significant differences were reported in the AA: 109 (47%) patients had a z-score ≥2 and 67 (29%) a Z ≥ 3, but only 9 (3%) a BSA-IV ≥21 mm/m2 (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01) and 2 (0.9%) an AV ≥40 mm (p = 0.22 and p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that in the AA there are a significant number of patients in which it would be recommendable changing to BSA-IV when children are older than 10-year-old and BSA ≥1.5 m2. Regarding the AR, criteria for dilatation seems not to be influenced by the reference chosen.

Surgical management of the aorta in BAV patients

Patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) frequently develop aneurysms of the aortic root and tubular ascending aorta. Aneurysms of the aortic arch, in the absence of concomitant aortopathies, are much less common. According to the 2018 American Association of Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on BAV-related aortopathy, prophylactic surgical aortic repair / replacement is recommended starting at a maximum aortic diameter of 50 mm in patients with risk factors. Concomitant aortic surgery is also recommended at an aortic diameter of 45 mm in those patients with other indications for cardiac surgery (most commonly aortic valve procedures). The ultimate goal of prophylactic aortic surgery is the prevention of aortic catastrophes, e.g. aortic rupture or acute aortic dissection, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The surgical technique used - in elective and emergency cases - depends on the involvement and nature of the aortic valve disease, as well as the extent of aortic aneurysm formation. The current review focusses on the surgical management of the aortic root, tubular ascending aorta, and proximal aortic arch in BAV patients. Despite the abovementioned recommendations, many BAV patients develop acute aortic syndromes below the recommended aortic diameter thresholds. Further research is therefore required in order to identify high-risk BAV subgroups that would benefit from earlier surgical repair.

Surgical repair of bicuspid aortopathy at small diameters: Clinical and institutional factors

OBJECTIVE

Bicuspid aortic valve is a common risk factor for thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Guidelines for elective ascending aortic intervention (AAI) in bicuspid aortic valve are derived from limited evidence, and the extent of practice variation due to patient and provider characteristics is unknown. Using data from 2 large cardiovascular registries, we investigated factors that influence decisions for AAI.

METHODS

All bicuspid aortic valve cases with known aortic diameters and surgical status were included. We used multivariable logistic regression to profile predictors of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) or AVR+AAI, stratified by patient characteristics, surgical indications, and institution.

RESULTS

We studied 2861 subjects at 18 institutions from 1996 to 2015. The median aortic diameter of patients who underwent AVR+AAI varied widely across institutions (39-52 mm). Aortic diameters were <45 mm in 38% of patients undergoing AVR+AAI. Patients who underwent AAI at <45 mm, compared with those managed nonoperatively, were younger (54 ± 13 vs 61 ± 15 years; P < .001) with more frequent aortic stenosis (53% vs 28%; P < .001) and regurgitation (52% vs 18%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and institutional factors influence the timing of AAI and are associated with significant variability in ascending aortic diameter at AAI across institutions. More than one third of patients with a bicuspid aortic valve undergo AAI at aortic diameters <45 mm. Long-term outcomes of this subgroup of patients, who may manifest earlier and more severe disease, are needed to determine the risk-benefit ratio of routine aortic interventions at smaller diameters.

Risk Factors Associated with Ascending Aortic Aneurysms and Aortic Elasticity Parameters in Children with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Aneurysms of the ascending aorta are frequently found in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). This study assessed the risk factors of ascending aortic aneurysms and aortic elasticity in children with BAV. The study included 66 patients with no history of transcatheter intervention or surgical procedure who had been diagnosed with isolated BAV. Echocardiographic, blood pressure, and pulse measurements were obtained for all patients. The BAVs were classified as described by Sievers et al. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1226-1233, 2007), and aortic elasticity parameters were calculated using various formulas. The patients were divided into groups with and without cusp fusion, aortic stenosis (AS), aortic regurgitation (AR), or mixed lesions; the groups were then compared. The mean patient age was 10.43 ± 3.91 years; 15%he patients had no AS or AR, 33% had both AS and AR, 17% had AS alone, and 35% had AR alone. The most common type of BAV was type 5, and the ascending aorta z-scores were higher in children with mixed lesions and without a cusp fusion. Aortic distensibility (AD) was significantly higher, and the stiffness index was significantly lower, in patients with an ascending aorta z-score > 4. The ascending aortic z-scores were higher in the no-fusion and mixed lesion (AS + AR) groups, especially those originating from post-stenotic dilation due to AS. The AD was increased in patients with an ascending aorta z-score > 4. Patients should thus be monitored closely for dissection risk, and preventive medical treatment should be started early in those with AS without cusp fusion.