Fundoplication to preserve allograft function after lung transplant: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Pulmonary and esophageal function in lung transplantation: Fundamental principles and clinical application

The lungs and esophagus have a close anatomical and physiological relationship. Over the years, reflux-induced pulmonary injury has gained wider recognition, but the full effects of pulmonary disease on esophageal function are still unknown. Intrathoracic pressure dynamics potentially affect esophageal function, especially in patients with end-stage lung disease, both obstructive and restrictive. Lung transplantation is the only viable option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disease and has provided us with a unique opportunity to study these effects as transplantation restores the intrathoracic environment. Esophageal and foregut functional testing before and after transplantation provide insights into the pathophysiology of the foregut-pulmonary axis, such as how underlying pulmonary disease and intrathoracic pressure changes affect esophageal physiology. This review summarizes the available literature and shares the research experience of a lung transplant center, covering topics such as pre- and posttransplant foregut function, esophageal motility in lung transplant recipients, immune-mediated mechanisms of graft rejection associated with gastroesophageal reflux, and the role of antireflux surgery in this population.

A perspective on the clinical relevance of weak or nonacid reflux

BACKGROUND

Advances in ambulatory esophageal reflux monitoring that incorporated impedance electrodes to pH catheters have resulted in better characterization of retrograde bolus flow in the esophagus. With pH-impedance monitoring, in addition to acid reflux episodes identified by pH drops below 4.0, weakly acid reflux (WAR, pH 4-7) and nonacid reflux (NAR, pH >7.0) are also recognized, although both may be included under the umbrella term NAR. However, despite identification of ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring, data on clinical relevance and prognostic value of NAR are limited. The Lyon Consensus, an international expert review that defines conclusive metrics for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), identifies NAR as "supportive" but not conclusive for GERD.

PURPOSE

This review provides perspectives on whether NAR fulfills three criteria for clinical relevance: whether NAR sufficiently explains pathogenesis of symptoms, whether it is associated with meaningful manifestations of GERD, and whether it can predict treatment efficacy.

Laparoscopic fundoplication after lung transplantation does not appear to alter lung function trajectory

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to determine if allograft function in lung transplant (LTx) recipients improves or stabilizes after laparoscopic fundoplication (LF). The secondary aim was to examine the differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) before and after LF for various subgroups to identify patients who obtained a superior respiratory outcome after LF, and potential predictive factors for this outcome.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive LTx recipients undergoing LF at a single centre in Brisbane, Australia between 2004 and 2018. 149/431 proceeded to LF after clinical review and pH study. Regular pre- and post-fundoplication pulmonary function tests were collected from participants. Data were analyzed with linear mixed models, random intercept models, the Reliable Change Index (RCI), and graphical and visual analysis of the trajectory of FEV1.

RESULTS

There was 100% follow-up. After Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparison was performed, none of the models demonstrated statistical significance. The Reliable Change Index showed one patient had a significant improvement in lung function across that time period, while nine had a significant reduction. The rate of change before and after LF was similar for the 132/149 patients for whom the first and last pre- and post-LF FEV1 values were available. A subset of patients had a considerable reduction in their FEV1 in the peri-operative period (i.e., a large difference between the first measurement post-LF and the final measurement pre-LF).

CONCLUSION

In the largest published cohort to date, LF performed in a high-volume center did not appear to alter the reduction in allograft function seen with time.

A potential mechanism by which aspiration of duodenogastric fluid augments the risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Aspiration of duodenogastric refluxate may damage the respiratory epithelium of lung allografts in transplant recipients. We sought to define a mechanism by which aspiration of duodenogastric fluid augments the risk of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplant in a murine model.

METHODS

We analyzed the immunological effects of acute aspiration of duodenogastric fluid (0.5 mL/kg) on transplant naive (strain DBA/2J) and transplanted mice (strain B6D2F1/J to strain DBA/2J). Serum antibodies to the lung self-antigens (SAgs) K-alpha1 tubulin and collagen-V were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Exosomes were isolated from serum, and immunoblot membranes were probed for antibodies to lung SAgs. Lung sections were assessed for fibrotic burden and obliterative bronchiolitis lesions by histologic and immunohistochemical analyses, including trichrome staining.

RESULTS

Transplanted mice that received duodenogastric fluid developed higher levels of antibodies to the lung SAgs K-alpha1 tubulin and collagen-V and exosomes with lung SAgs on posttransplant days 14 and 28 than transplanted mice with sham aspiration or transplant naive mice (with and without aspiration). All lung allografts demonstrated severe grade A4 rejection on posttransplant day 14, with the highest mean fibrotic burden and mean number of obliterative bronchiolitis-like lesions per microscopic field on day 28 in recipients with aspiration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study links aspiration of duodenogastric fluid after lung transplant to higher autoimmune responses to lung SAgs and the release of circulating exosomes with lung SAgs, which together promote sustained immune responses leading to extensive lung parenchymal damage and, ultimately, severe obliterative bronchiolitis-the histologic hallmark of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease

Lung transplantation (LTx) can be a life-extending treatment option for patients with advanced and/or progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis and connective tissue disease-associated ILD. IPF is now the most common indication for LTx worldwide. Several unique features in patients with ILD can impact optimal timing of referral or listing for LTx, pre- or post-transplant risks, candidacy and post-transplant management. As the epidemiology of LTx and community practices have evolved, recent literature describes outcomes and approaches in higher-risk candidates. In this review, we discuss the unique and important clinical findings, course, monitoring and management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrotic ILDs during pre-LTx evaluation and up to the day of transplantation; the need for co-management with clinical experts in ILD and LTx is emphasised. Some post-LTx complications are unique in these patient cohorts, which require prompt detection and appropriate management by experts in multiple disciplines familiar with telomere biology disorders and infectious, haematological, oncological and cardiac complications to enhance the likelihood of improved outcomes and survival of LTx recipients with IPF and other ILDs.

Identification of Lung Transplant Recipients with a Survival Benefit after Fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and aspiration of enteric contents is associated with worse outcomes after lung transplant. The purpose of this study is to elucidate populations that benefit the most from fundoplication after lung transplant.

METHODS

Lung transplants from 2001-2019 (n=971) were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by a fundoplication before (n=128) or after (n=24) chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) development vs those who didn't. Patients with a fundoplication prior to CLAD were propensity-matched to those without a fundoplication. The primary outcome of interest was post-transplant survival. Time-to-event rates were calculated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier functions.

RESULTS

A fundoplication prior to CLAD improved post-transplant survival before and after propensity-matching, and remained a significant predictor after adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR:0.57, 95% CI:0.4-0.8, P=0.001). Recipients with a restrictive disorder (HR: 0.46, 95% CI:0.3-0.73, P=0.001), age <65 (HR:0.48, 95% CI:0.32-0.71, P<0.001), and both single (HR:0.47, 95% CI:0.28-0.79, P=0.005) or double (HR:0.55, 95% CI:0.32-0.93, P=0.027) lung transplants had a significant decrease in mortality after fundoplication. The effect was present after excluding early deaths and/or CLAD diagnoses. GERD diagnosed by pH, impedance or EGD was not associated with worse outcomes. Among patients with CLAD, a fundoplication was an independent predictor of post-CLAD survival (HR:0.27, 95% CI:0.12-0.61, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

A fundoplication before or after CLAD development is an independent predictor of survival. Younger patients with restrictive disease, independent of the type of transplant, have a survival benefit. GERD diagnosed by conventional methods was not associated with worse survival.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Evolving Concepts and Therapies

The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD.

Esophageal disease in lung transplant patients

There is a very well-established and complex interplay between gastroesophageal reflux and lung disease. This is particularly true in end-stage lung disease and post-lung transplant patients. Numerous studies have shown that in patients who are undergoing pre-lung transplant evaluations for diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), emphysema, connective tissue disease, there is a high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal dysmotility. Post-lung transplant, many of the reflux issues persist or worsen, and there is some evidence to suggest that this leads to worsened long-term allograft function and bronchiolitis obliterans. Anti-reflux operations in patients with lung disease have been shown to be safe in both the pre and post-lung transplant setting and lead to improved reflux symptoms, as well as protecting against reflux induced allograft dysfunction in the post-lung transplant patients. Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal malignancy are also not unheard of in these patients, and select patients may benefit from operative intervention. This review discusses the links between gastroesophageal reflux and lung transplant patients in both the pre and post-transplant setting. We also review the approach to the workup of esophageal disease in the pre-lung transplant setting as well as the surgical management of this unique group of patients.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Idiopathic Lung Fibrosis. From Heartburn to Lung Transplant, and Beyond

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are undoubtedly related. Even though it is not clear yet which one is the primary disease, they certainly interact increasing each other's severity. Symptoms are unreliable to diagnose GERD in patients with IPF, and objective evaluation with pH monitoring and/or bronchoalveolar lavage analysis is mandatory. Pharmacological treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may bring control of IPF in few patients, but PPIs do not control reflux but just change the pH of the gastric refluxate. Surgical therapy based on a fundoplication is safe and effective as it controls any type of reflux, independently from the pH of the gastric refluxate. In patients waiting for lung transplantation (if they can tolerate a laparoscopic operation under general anesthesia), a fundoplication before the operation might block the progression of IPF, while after transplantation it might prevent rejection by preventing the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

Challenges in the use of highly effective modulator treatment for cystic fibrosis

The last decade has seen development of oral, small molecule therapies that address the basic cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein defect. Highly effective modulator treatment (HEMT) that is efficacious for a large majority of people living with cystic fibrosis (CF) promises to change the landscape of this chronic life-limiting disease. Some people living with CF have a CFTR genotype that renders them eligible for HEMT, but also have comorbidities that excluded them from the original Phase III clinical trials that led to US Food and Drug Administration approval. The purpose of this review is to address the use of HEMT in challenging situations, including initiation for those with advanced CF lung disease, and use after solid organ transplant, during pregnancy, and for individuals with CFTR-related disorders without a definitive diagnosis of CF.

An update on current treatment strategies for managing bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a subtype of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, is quite common, with up to half of all lung recipients developing BOS within 5 years of transplantation. Preventive efforts are aimed at alleviating known risk factors of BOS development, while the primary goal of treatment is to delay the irreversible, fibrotic airway changes, and progressive loss of lung function.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review will briefly discuss the updated definition, clinical presentation, pathogenesis, risk factors, and survival after BOS while paying particular attention to the salient evidence for optimal preventive strategies and treatments based on investigations in the modern era.

EXPERT OPINION

Future translational research focused on further characterizing the complex interplay between immune and nonimmune mechanisms mediating chronic lung rejection is the first step toward mitigating risk of allograft injury, improving early disease detection with noninvasive biomarkers, and ultimately, developing an effective, targeted therapy that can extend the life of the lung allograft.