Fundoplication after lung transplantation in patients with systemic sclerosis-related end-stage lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration are risk factors for chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. Patients with systemic sclerosis are at an increased risk of aspiration due to esophageal dysmotility and an ineffective lower esophageal sphincter. The aim of this study is to understand the effect of fundoplication on outcomes in systemic sclerosis recipients.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2019, 168 systemic sclerosis patients were referred for lung transplantation-51 (30.3%) were listed and 36 (21.4%) were transplanted. Recipients were stratified whether they underwent a fundoplication (n = 10, 27.8%) or not (n = 26, 72.2%). Freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction and survival were analyzed using log-rank test. Multivariable analysis for known risk factors was performed using a Cox-proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Median time to fundoplication after transplantation was 16.4 months (interquartile range: 9.6-25.1) and all were laparoscopic (Dor 50%, Nissen 40%, Toupet 10%). There were no differences in acute rejection ⩾ A1 (26.9% vs 30%), or primary graft dysfunction grades 2-3 at 72 h (42.3% vs 40%) between groups. Recipients with fundoplication had an increased freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (p = 0.035) and overall survival (p = 0.01). Fundoplication was associated with a reduced risk of mortality adjusting for other comorbidities (hazard ratio = 0.13; 95% confidence interval = 0.02-0.65; p = 0.014). Double and single lung transplant did not have different post-transplant survival.

CONCLUSION

Fundoplication in systemic sclerosis lung transplant recipients is associated with greater freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction and overall survival. Screening for reflux and aspiration followed by early fundoplication may delay graft deterioration in this population.

Lung transplantation disparities based on diagnosis for patients bridging to transplant on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly utilized as a bridge to lung transplantation, but ECMO status is not explicitly accounted for in the Lung Allocation Score (LAS). We hypothesized that among waitlist patients on ECMO, patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) would have lower transplantation rates.

METHODS

Using United Network for Organ Sharing data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who were ≥12 years old, active on the lung transplant waitlist, and required ECMO support from June 1, 2015 through June 12, 2020. Multivariable competing risk analysis was used to examine waitlist outcomes.

RESULTS

1064 waitlist subjects required ECMO support; 40 (3.8%) had obstructive lung disease (OLD), 97 (9.1%) had PAH,138 (13.0%) had cystic fibrosis (CF), and 789 (74.1%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD). Ultimately, 671 (63.1%) underwent transplant, while 334 (31.4%) died or were delisted. The transplant rate per person-years on the waitlist on ECMO was 15.41 for OLD, 6.05 for PAH, 15.66 for CF, and 15.62 for ILD. Compared to PAH patients, OLD, CF, and ILD patients were 78%, 69%, and 62% more likely to undergo transplant throughout the study period, respectively (adjusted SHRs 1.78 p = 0.007, 1.69 p = 0.002, and 1.62 p = 0.001). The median LAS at waitlist removal for transplantation, death, or delisting were 75.1 for OLD, 79.6 for PAH, 91.0 for CF, and 88.3 for ILD (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients bridging to transplant on ECMO, patients with PAH had a lower transplantation rate than patients with OLD, CF, and ILD.

Identification of Lung Transplant Recipients with a Survival Benefit after Fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and aspiration of enteric contents is associated with worse outcomes after lung transplant. The purpose of this study is to elucidate populations that benefit the most from fundoplication after lung transplant.

METHODS

Lung transplants from 2001-2019 (n=971) were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by a fundoplication before (n=128) or after (n=24) chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) development vs those who didn't. Patients with a fundoplication prior to CLAD were propensity-matched to those without a fundoplication. The primary outcome of interest was post-transplant survival. Time-to-event rates were calculated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier functions.

RESULTS

A fundoplication prior to CLAD improved post-transplant survival before and after propensity-matching, and remained a significant predictor after adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR:0.57, 95% CI:0.4-0.8, P=0.001). Recipients with a restrictive disorder (HR: 0.46, 95% CI:0.3-0.73, P=0.001), age <65 (HR:0.48, 95% CI:0.32-0.71, P<0.001), and both single (HR:0.47, 95% CI:0.28-0.79, P=0.005) or double (HR:0.55, 95% CI:0.32-0.93, P=0.027) lung transplants had a significant decrease in mortality after fundoplication. The effect was present after excluding early deaths and/or CLAD diagnoses. GERD diagnosed by pH, impedance or EGD was not associated with worse outcomes. Among patients with CLAD, a fundoplication was an independent predictor of post-CLAD survival (HR:0.27, 95% CI:0.12-0.61, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

A fundoplication before or after CLAD development is an independent predictor of survival. Younger patients with restrictive disease, independent of the type of transplant, have a survival benefit. GERD diagnosed by conventional methods was not associated with worse survival.

Geographic Differences in Lung Transplant Volume and Donor Availability During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Regional variation in lung transplantation practices due to local coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevalence may cause geographic disparities in access to lung transplantation.

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, we conducted a descriptive analysis of lung transplant volume, donor lung volume, new waitlist activations, and waiting list deaths at high-volume lung transplant centers during the first 3 months of the pandemic (March 1. 2020, to May 30, 2020) and we compared it to the same period in the preceding 5 years.

RESULTS

Lung transplant volume decreased by 10% nationally and by a median of 50% in high COVID-19 prevalence centers (range -87% to 80%) compared with a median increase of 10% (range -87% to 80%) in low prevalence centers (P-for-trend 0.006). Donation services areas with high COVID-19 prevalence experienced a greater decrease in organ availability (-28% range, -72% to -11%) compared with low prevalence areas (+7%, range -20% to + 55%, P-for-trend 0.001). Waiting list activations decreased at 18 of 22 centers. Waiting list deaths were similar to the preceding 5 years and independent of local COVID-19 prevalence (P-for-trend 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional variation in transplantation and donor availability in the early months of the pandemic varied by local COVID-19 activity.

COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A single center case series from New York City

There are limited data describing COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients. We performed a single center, retrospective case series study of lung transplant patients followed by the Columbia Lung Transplant program who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 19 and May 19, 2020. Thirty-two lung transplant patients developed mild (16%), moderate (44%), or severe (41%) COVID-19. The median age of patients was 65 years, and the median time from lung transplant was 5.6 years. Symptoms included cough (66%), dyspnea (50%), fever (47%), and gastrointestinal upset (44%). Patients received hydroxychloroquine (84%), azithromycin (75%), augmented steroids (44%), tocilizumab (19%), and remdesivir (9%). Eleven patients (34%) died at a median time of 14 days from admission. Complications during admission included: acute kidney injury (63%), transaminitis (31%), shock (31%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (25%), neurological events (25%), arrhythmias (22%), and venous thromboembolism (9%). Compared to patients with moderate COVID-19, patients with severe COVID-19 had higher peak white blood cell counts (15.8 vs 7 × 10³ /uL, P = .019), C-reactive protein (198 vs. 107 mg/L, P = .010) and D-dimer (8.6 vs. 2.1 ug/mL, P = .004) levels, and lower nadir lymphocyte counts (0.09 vs. 0.4 × 10³ /uL, P = .006). COVID-19 is associated with severe illness and a high mortality rate in lung transplant recipients.

What Awaits on the Other Side: Post-Lung Transplant Morbidity and Mortality After Pre-Transplant Hospitalization

Background

Morbidity and mortality rates after lung transplantation remain high compared to other solid organ transplants. In the lung allocation score era, patients given the highest priority on the waitlist are those with the greatest severity of illness, who often require preoperative hospitalization.

Material/Methods

To determine the association of pre-transplant hospitalization with post-transplant outcomes, we retrospectively evaluated 448 lung transplant recipients at our center between January 2010 and July 2017 (114 hospitalized; 334 outpatient).

Results

Survival was similar between the groups (hazard ratio 0.93 [95% CI 0.61 to 1.42], p=0.738). However, hospitalized patients had longer hospital and intensive care unit length of stay compared to outpatients – 25 vs. 18 days, (p<0.001) and 9.5 vs. 6 days, (p<0.001), respectively. Hospitalized patients had higher rates of Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction – 29.8% vs. 9.6%, p<0.001 – and remained mechanically ventilated longer – 6 vs. 3 days, p<0.001. A greater percentage of hospitalized patients needed a tracheostomy and a re-operation within 30 days – 39.5% vs. 15.3% (p<0.001) and 22.8% vs. 12.0% (p=0.005) – respectively. After discharge, 28% of hospitalized patients required acute rehabilitation compared with 12% of outpatients (p=0.001).

Conclusions

While pre-transplant hospitalization is not associated with mortality, it is associated with significant morbidity after transplant.

Characteristics and outcomes of lung cancer in solid organ transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer is the third most common malignancy that develops in patients following solid organ transplantation and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the general population. The aims of this study are to examine the characteristics of patients who developed lung cancer following solid organ transplantation at our institution and to compare their outcomes to those of lung cancer patients without a history of transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective study of 44 solid organ transplant recipients who developed lung cancer and compared their characteristics to a cohort of 74 lung cancer patients without a history of transplant. We performed propensity score weighted analyses to compare outcomes between the two groups, including a cox proportional hazards model of overall survival.

RESULTS

52 % of post-transplant patients who developed lung cancer were diagnosed with stage III or IV disease. In the propensity score weighted analysis that accounted for age at diagnosis, sex, lung cancer stage at diagnosis, Charlson comorbidity index score, and ECOG performance score, post-transplant patients were more likely to have squamous cell histology (p < 0.01) and had worse overall survival compared to the non-transplant cohort (HR = 1.88, 95 % CI 1.13-3.12, p = 0.02). The difference in survival remained significant after accounting for differences in lung cancer histology and treatment (HR = 2.40, 95 % CI 1.27-3.78, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to non-transplant patients with lung cancer, post-transplant patients have worse overall survival after accounting for differences in age, sex, lung cancer stage, comorbidities, and performance status. This survival difference is not solely attributable to differences in tumor histology and treatments received. This may suggest that post-transplant malignancies are more aggressive and difficult to treat.

Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Menstruating Women Has High Recurrence

BACKGROUND

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is treated on the basis of studies that have predominantly consisted of tall male subjects. Here, we determined recurrence of PSP in average-statured menstruating women and studied prevalence of catamenial pneumothorax (CP) in this population.

METHODS

Men and menstruating women, aged 18 to 55 years, without underlying lung disease or substance abuse were retrospectively studied between 2009 and 2015. A chest pathologist reviewed all specimens for thoracic endometriosis. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to determine recurrence.

RESULTS

The median age of women (n = 33) and men (n = 183) was 33.4 and 31.6 years, respectively. In women, 9 (27%) had left-sided and 24 (73%) had right-sided PSP, treated with tube thoracostomy. Recurrence occurred in 21 women (64%) with median follow-up of 14 months, and they were treated with thoracoscopic pleurodesis. Right PSP had higher recurrence (70%) than left PSP (56%, p = 0.02). Four women (12%) presented with recurrent tension pneumothorax within 6 months. Eight patients (24%) had PSP within 72 hours of menses, meeting clinical criteria of CP. All these were placed on hormonal suppression after initial episode but went on to experience recurrence that was treated with pleurodesis. Classical endometrial glands were not found in any biopsy specimens obtained during the thoracoscopy. In contrast to female subjects, only 8 average-statured men (4.4%) had recurrence (p < 0.001) with a median follow-up of 16 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PSP in healthy average-statured menstruating women has high recurrence compared with male counterparts. CP is a clinical diagnosis and often recurs despite hormonal suppression therapy.