Surgery and invasive diagnostic procedures for benign disease are rare in a large low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening program

Gender-specific outcomes of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer detection: A retrospective study in Chinese never-smoker population

OBJECTIVES

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has emerged as a pivotal tool for detecting lung cancer among ever-smokers. This study aims to evaluate the gender-specific outcomes of LDCT screening within the Chinese never-smoking population.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study, which analyzed LDCT screening outcomes for 42,018 asymptomatic participants. Specifically, we focused on assessing gender-specific differences in the prevalence of pulmonary nodules, and the incidence of lung cancer diagnosis among never-smokers.

RESULTS

Among the 42,018 eligible participants, 41.50% were females and 58.50% were males. Most participants were non-smokers (77.57%), with a significantly higher proportion of non-smokers among females than males (99.33% vs. 62.14%). Pulmonary nodules were identified in 2.66% of participants, with a higher prevalence in females (2.99%) than males (2.43%) (p < 0.001). Non-smoking females had a higher incidence of positive nodules than non-smoking males (2.98% vs. 2.38%, p < 0.001). Invasive biopsies were performed in 334 individuals with nodules, confirming lung cancer in 258 cases. The majority of these cancer cases were non-smokers (212), with non-smoking females showing a higher incidence (0.85%) compared to males (0.43%) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the false-positive rates between non-smoking females (0.14%) and males (0.13%). Multivariate analysis showed that never-smoking women were more likely to undergo biopsies (OR 1.65, p = 0.0016) and had a higher, though not statistically significant, probability of lung cancer diagnosis (OR 1.84, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

This study elucidates sex-based differences within the Chinese population, revealing a higher prevalence of pulmonary nodules and lung cancers among non-smoking females. These findings offer valuable reference for both clinical practice and future research initiatives.

Lung cancer screening in Brazil: recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, Brazilian Thoracic Association, and Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging

Although lung cancer (LC) is one of the most common and lethal tumors, only 15% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. Smoking is still responsible for more than 85% of cases. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) reduces LC-related mortality by 20%, and that reduction reaches 38% when LCS by LDCT is combined with smoking cessation. In the last decade, a number of countries have adopted population-based LCS as a public health recommendation. Albeit still incipient, discussion on this topic in Brazil is becoming increasingly broad and necessary. With the aim of increasing knowledge and stimulating debate on LCS, the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, the Brazilian Thoracic Association, and the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging convened a panel of experts to prepare recommendations for LCS in Brazil. The recommendations presented here were based on a narrative review of the literature, with an emphasis on large population-based studies, systematic reviews, and the recommendations of international guidelines, and were developed after extensive discussion by the panel of experts. The following topics were reviewed: reasons for screening; general considerations about smoking; epidemiology of LC; eligibility criteria; incidental findings; granulomatous lesions; probabilistic models; minimum requirements for LDCT; volumetric acquisition; risks of screening; minimum structure and role of the multidisciplinary team; practice according to the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System; costs versus benefits of screening; and future perspectives for LCS.

Surgical Resection of Benign Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening: Incidence and Features

Introduction

Interventions and surgical procedures are common for nonmalignant lung lesions detected on lung cancer screening (LCS). Inadvertent surgical resection of benign nodules with a clinical suspicion of lung cancer can occur, can be associated with complications, and adds to the cost of screening. The objective of this study is to assess the characteristics of surgically resected benign nodules detected on LCS computed tomography which were presumed to be lung cancers.

Methods

This retrospective study included 4798 patients who underwent LCS between June 2014 and January 2021. The benign lung nodules, surgically resected with a presumed cancer diagnosis, were identified from the LCS registry. Patient demographics, imaging characteristics, and pathologic diagnoses of benign nodules were analyzed.

Results

Of the 4798 patients who underwent LCS, 148 (3.1%) underwent surgical resection of a lung nodule, and of those who had a resection, 19 of 148 (12.8%) had a benign diagnosis (median age = 64 y, range: 56-77 y; F = 12 of 19, 63.2%; M = seven of 19, 36.8%). The median nodule size was 10 mm (range: 6-31 mm). Most nodules were solid (15 of 19, 78.9%), located in the upper lobes (11 of 19; 57.9%), and were peripheral (17 of 19, 89.5%). Most nodules (13 of 17; 76.5%) had interval growth, and four of 17 (23.5%) had increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. Of the 19 patients, 17 (89.5%) underwent sublobar resection (16 wedge resection and one segmentectomy), whereas two central nodules (10.5%) had lobectomies. Pathologies identified included focal areas of fibrosis or scarring (n = 8), necrotizing granulomatous inflammation (n = 3), other nonspecific inflammatory focus (n = 3), benign tumors (n = 3), reactive lymphoid hyperplasia (n = 1), and organizing pneumonia (n = 1).

Conclusions

Surgical resections of benign nodules that were presumed malignant are infrequent and may be unavoidable given overlapping imaging features of benign and malignant nodules. Knowledge of benign pathologies that can mimic malignancy may help reduce the incidence of unnecessary surgeries.

Building a Lung Cancer Screening Program

Lung cancer screening improves lung-cancer specific and potentially overall survival; however, uptake rates are concerningly low. Several barriers to screening exist and require a systemic approach to address. The authors describe their approach toward building a centralized lung cancer screening program at an urban academic center along with lessons learned. To this end, the identification of involved stakeholders, evaluation of community barriers and needs, optimization of the electronic health system, and implementation of system of standardized follow-up for patients are processes for consideration. Perhaps most important to undertaking this endeavor is the need to customize each program and maintain adaptability.

Invasive Procedures Associated With Lung Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

The harm associated with imaging abnormalities related to lung cancer screening (LCS) is not well documented, especially outside the clinical trial and academic setting.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the frequency of invasive procedures and complications associated with a community based LCS program, including procedures for false-positive and benign, but clinically important, incidental findings?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of an LCS program at a nonuniversity teaching hospital from 2016 through 2019 to identify invasive procedures prompted by LCS results, including their indication and complications.

RESULTS

Among 2,003 LCS participants, 58 patients (2.9%) received a diagnosis of lung cancer and 71 patients (3.5%) received a diagnosis of any malignancy. Invasive procedures were performed 160 times in 103 participants (5.1%), including 1.7% of those without malignancy. Eight invasive procedures (0.4% of participants), including four surgeries (12% of diagnostic lung resections), were performed for false-positive lung nodules. Only 1% of Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4A nodules that proved benign were subject to an invasive procedure. Among those without malignancy, an invasive procedure was performed in eight participants for extrapulmonary false-positive findings (0.4%) and in 19 participants (0.9%) to evaluate incidental findings considered benign but clinically important. Procedures for the latter indication resulted in treatment, change in management, or diagnosis in 79% of individuals. Invasive procedures in those without malignancy resulted in three complications (0.15%). Seventy nonsurgical procedures (6% complication rate) and 48 thoracic surgeries (4% major complication rate) were performed in those with malignancy.

INTERPRETATION

The use of invasive procedures to resolve false-positive findings was uncommon in the clinical practice of a nonuniversity LCS program that adhered to a nodule management algorithm and used a multidisciplinary approach. Incidental findings considered benign but clinically important resulted in invasive procedure rates that were similar to those for false-positive findings and frequently had clinical value.

Outcomes of Positive and Suspicious Findings in Clinical CT Lung Cancer Screening and the Road Ahead

Rationale

Future optimization of computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening (CTLS) algorithms will depend on clinical outcomes data.

Objectives

To report the outcomes of positive and suspicious findings in a clinical CTLS program.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed results for patients from our institution undergoing lung cancer screening from January 2012 through December 2018, with follow-up through December 2019. All exams were retrospectively rescored using Lung-RADS v1.1 (LR). Metrics assessed included positive, probably benign, and suspicious exam rates, frequency/nature of care escalation, and lung cancer detection rates after a positive, probably benign, and suspicious exam result and overall. We calculated time required to resolve suspicious exams as malignant or benign. Results were broken down by subcategories, reason for positive/suspicious designation, and screening round.

Results

During the study period 4,301 individuals underwent a total of 10,897 exams. The number of positive (13.9%), suspicious (5.5%), and significant incidental (6.4%) findings was significantly higher at baseline screening. Cancer detection and false-positive rates were 2.0% and 12.3% at baseline versus 1.3% and 5.1% across subsequent screening rounds, respectively. Baseline solid nodule(s) 6 to <8 mm were the only probably benign findings resulting in lung cancer detection within 12 months. New solid nodules 6 to <8 mm were the only LR category 4A (LR4A) findings falling within the LR predicted cancer detection range of 5–15% (12.8%). 38.5% of LR4A cancers were detected within 3 months.

Conclusions

Modification of the definition and suggested workup of positive and suspicious lung cancer screening findings appears warranted.

Surgery without preoperative histological confirmation of lung cancer: what is the current clinical practice?

BACKGROUND

There are discordances in the guidelines regarding the need to acquire histological diagnosis before surgical treatment of (presumed) lung cancer. Preoperative histological confirmation is always encouraged in this setting to prevent unnecessary surgery or when sublobar resection for small-sized tumors is considered. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the proportion of patients undergoing lung cancer resection in the Netherlands without preoperative pathological confirmation, based on the intraoperative pathological diagnosis (IOD) rate, and to determine characteristics that may influence IOD frequency.

METHODS

Data on 10,226 patients, who underwent surgical treatment for lung cancer from 2010 to 2015, were retrieved from the Netherlands National Cancer Registry. We registered an IOD when the date of diagnosis equaled the date of the first surgical intervention. Tabulations and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictive parameters for IOD.

RESULTS

36% of surgical procedures were classified as IOD, and decreased with increasing tumor size and extent of surgery (57% for segmentectomy, 39% for lobectomy and 11% for pneumonectomy). IOD was more frequently observed in adenocarcinoma (41%), varied between hospitals from 13% to 66% and was less common when patients were referred from a hospital where thoracic surgery was not performed. Previous history of cancer did not affect IOD.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one-third of patients with suspected lung cancer in the Netherlands was operated without preoperative histological confirmation. There was significant variation in IOD rates between different hospitals, which deserves further detailed analysis when striving for uniform surgical quality of care for patients with lung cancer.

A Structured Program Maximizes Benefit of Lung Cancer Screening in an Area of Endemic Histoplasmosis

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography has demonstrated at least a 20% decrease in lung cancer-specific mortality, but has the potential harm of unnecessary invasive procedures due to false positive results. We report the outcomes of a structured multi-disciplinary lung cancer screening program in an area of endemic histoplasmosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing lung cancer screening from December 2012 to March 2019 was conducted. Findings suspicious for lung cancer were presented at a multidisciplinary thoracic tumor board. Patients were assigned to interval imaging follow-up, additional diagnostic imaging, or referral for an invasive procedure. Invasive procedures were then compared between benign and malignant pathologies.

RESULTS

4087 scans were done on 2129 patients. 372 (9.1%) were suspicious and presented at a multidisciplinary thoracic tumor board. Ultimately 108 procedures were done: 55 bronchoscopies, seven percutaneous biopsies, and 46 operations. 25 patients (1.2%) underwent bronchoscopy resulting in benign pathology, significantly associated with an indication of an endobronchial lesion (p=0.01). All percutaneous biopsies revealed malignancy. Five patients (0.2%) who underwent resection had benign disease. Lung cancer was diagnosed in 67 patients (3.1% of the entire cohort), 46 of which were stage I/II.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer screening in a structured, multidisciplinary program successfully identifies patients with early-stage lung cancer with limited unnecessary surgical interventions. Isolated endobronchial lesions should undergo short interval imaging follow up to avoid bronchoscopy for benign disease. Future studies to minimize unnecessary procedures could incorporate biomarkers and advanced imaging analysis into risk assessment models.

Quantifying Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening in an Underserved Population: Results From a Prospective Study

Lung cancer screening with annual low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer death by 20-26%. However, potential harms of screening include false-positive results, procedures from false positives, procedural complications and failure to adhere to follow-up recommendations. In diverse, underserved populations, it is unknown if benefits of early lung cancer detection outweigh harms. We conducted a prospective observational study of lung cancer screening participants in an urban, safety-net institution from September 2014 to June 2020. We measured benefits of screening in terms of cancer diagnosis, stage, and treatment. We measured harms of screening by calculating false-positive rate, procedures as a result of false positive screens, procedural complications, and failure to follow-up with recommended care. Of patients with 3-year follow up, we measured these same outcomes in addition to compliance with annual screening. Of 1509 participants, 55.6% were African American, 35.2% White, 8.1% Hispanic, and 0.5% Asian. Screening resulted in cancer detection and treatment in 2.8%. False positive and procedure as a result of a false positive occurred in 9.2% and 0.8% of participants, respectively with no major complications from diagnostic procedures or treatment. Adherence to annual screening was low, 18.7%, 3.7%, and 0.4% at 1, 2, and 3 years after baseline screening respectively. Multidisciplinary lung cancer screening in a safety-net institution can successfully detect and treat lung cancer with few harms of false-positive screens, procedure after false-positive screens and major complications. However, adherence to annual screening is poor.