1
|
Dimarakis I, Callan P, Khorsandi M, Pal JD, Bravo CA, Mahr C, Keenan JE. Pathophysiology and management of valvular disease in patients with destination left ventricular assist devices. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1029825. [PMID: 36407458 PMCID: PMC9669306 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1029825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, implantable continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have proven to be invaluable tools for the management of selected advanced heart failure patients, improving patient longevity and quality of life. The presence of concomitant valvular pathology, including that involving the tricuspid, mitral, and aortic valve, has important implications relating to the decision to move forward with LVAD implantation. Furthermore, the presence of concomitant valvular pathology often influences the surgical strategy for LVAD implantation. Concomitant valve repair or replacement is not uncommonly required in such circumstances, which increases surgical complexity and has demonstrated prognostic implications both short and longer term following LVAD implantation. Beyond the index operation, it is also well established that certain valvular pathologies may develop or worsen over time following LVAD support. The presence of pre-existing valvular pathology or that which develops following LVAD implant is of particular importance to the destination therapy LVAD patient population. As these patients are not expected to have the opportunity for heart transplantation in the future, optimization of LVAD support including ameliorating valvular disease is critical for the maximization of patient longevity and quality of life. As collective experience has grown over time, the ability of clinicians to effectively address concomitant valvular pathology in LVAD patients has improved in the pre-implant, implant, and post-implant phase, through both medical management and procedural optimization. Nevertheless, there remains uncertainty over many facets of concomitant valvular pathology in advanced heart failure patients, and the understanding of how to best approach these conditions in the LVAD patient population continues to evolve. Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the current state of the field relating to the pathophysiology and management of valvular disease in destination LVAD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Dimarakis
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Callan
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Maziar Khorsandi
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Jay D. Pal
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Claudio A. Bravo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Claudius Mahr
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Jeffrey E. Keenan
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noly PE, Duggal N, Jiang M, Nordsletten D, Bonini M, Lei I, Ela AAE, Haft JW, Pagani FD, Cascino TM, Tang PC. Role of the mitral valve in left ventricular assist device pathophysiology. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1018295. [PMID: 36386343 PMCID: PMC9649705 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1018295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of heart failure results from progressive dilatation of the left ventricle (LV) and mitral annulus. This leads to leaflet tethering with posterior displacement. Contrary to common assumptions, MR often does not resolve with LVAD decompression of the LV alone. The negative impact of significant (moderate-severe) mitral regurgitation in the LVAD setting is becoming better recognized in terms of its harmful effect on right heart function, pulmonary vascular resistance and hospital readmissions. However, controversies remain regarding the threshold for intervention and management. At present, there are no consensus indications for the repair of significant mitral regurgitation at the time of LVAD implantation due to the conflicting data regarding potential adverse effects of MR on clinical outcomes. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of MR pathophysiology in patients supported with LVAD and potential future management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Emmanuel Noly
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Neal Duggal
- Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Mulan Jiang
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - David Nordsletten
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Cardiac Surgery, Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Mia Bonini
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Cardiac Surgery, Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Ienglam Lei
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Ashraf Abou El Ela
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jonathan W. Haft
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Francis D. Pagani
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Thomas M. Cascino
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Paul C. Tang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Cardiac Surgery, Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rajagopal K, Cheema FH, Omer S. Commentary: Heart failure and the problem of causality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021:S0022-5223(21)01300-3. [PMID: 34654558 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Keshava Rajagopal
- Houston Heart, HCA Houston Healthcare, Houston, Tex; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Faisal H Cheema
- Houston Heart, HCA Houston Healthcare, Houston, Tex; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; HCA Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Shuab Omer
- Houston Heart, HCA Houston Healthcare, Houston, Tex.
| |
Collapse
|