EGFR TKIs plus WBRT Demonstrated No Survival Benefit Other Than That of TKIs Alone in Patients with NSCLC and EGFR Mutation and Brain Metastases

Combined use of radiotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review

The approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line agents has revolutionised treatment of patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring targetable mutations, adding substantial overall survival (OS) benefit, compared to chemotherapy. However, the efficacy of these agents is inevitably diminished at a point in the disease course, either because of cellular resistance-mechanisms or due to affected pharmacokinetics, like low-central nervous system penetration. The aim of this article is to review existing evidence on the combined use of EGFR (epidermal growth factor)- or ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase)-specific TKIs and radiotherapy (RT) in advanced NSCLC setting, as an attempt to delay or overcome TKI-resistance and thus, to expand the time period during which patients derive benefit from a given line of targeted therapy. At present, combining RT with EGFR- or ALK-TKIs in the management of advanced, oncodriver-mutated NSCLC has shown quite promising results, with regards to PFS and OS, rendering prolongation of the TKI-derived benefit feasible, with generally tolerable toxicity. Future studies to confirm the observed efficacy and clarify possible safety issues as well as the appropriate treatment sequence and target volumes are needed, especially in the rapidly-evolving era of newer-generation TKIs.

Central nervous system metastases in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the therapeutic landscape

Up to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Current treatments for this subgroup of patients with advanced NSCLC include local therapies (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and, less frequently, whole-brain radiotherapy), targeted therapies for oncogene-addicted NSCLC (small molecules, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (as monotherapy or combination therapy), with multiple new drugs in development. However, confirming the intracranial activity of these treatments has proven to be challenging, given that most lung cancer clinical trials exclude patients with untreated and/or progressing CNS metastases, or do not include prespecified CNS-related endpoints. Here we review progress in the treatment of patients with CNS metastases originating from NSCLC, examining local treatment options, systemic therapies, and multimodal therapeutic strategies. We also consider challenges regarding assessment of treatment response and provide thoughts around future directions for managing CNS disease in patients with advanced NSCLC.

First-line treatment with TKI plus brain radiotherapy versus TKI alone in EGFR-mutated non-small cell Lung cancer with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain whether first-line treatment with upfront brain radiotherapy (RT) in combined with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is superior to EGFR-TKIs alone for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with newly diagnosed brain metastases (BMs). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to address this issue.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for eligible studies published until February 28, 2023. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), reported as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Twenty-four retrospective studies with 3184 patients were included. First- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs were used in each study. Upfront brain RT plus EGFR-TKIs significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.88) and iPFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.52-0.72) compared to EGFR-TKIs alone. There were no significant differences in OS and iPFS benefits from the combination therapy between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, patients with exon 19 and 21 mutations, patients with 1-3 and > 3 BMs, and males and females, respectively (HRs interaction, P > 0.05 for each subgroup comparison).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line treatment with upfront brain RT plus EGFR-TKIs is likely to be more effective than EGFR-TKIs alone. The benefits of combination therapy did not appear to be significantly affected by BM-related symptoms, EGFR mutation subtype, number of BMs, or sex.

Prognostic value of cranial radiotherapy and optimal timing stratified by lung-molGPA for NSCLC patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

The updated Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (lung-molGPA) index provide more accurate survival prediction for patients diagnose with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM). Given that the value of cranial radiotherapy (CRT) is still controversial for NSCLC patients with BM, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the value of CRT and optimal timing in NSCLC patients with initial BM after stratified with lung-molGPA index.

METHODS

This study screened NSCLC patients with initial BM in our cancer center from February 2012 to July 2018. The prognosis value of CRT and optimal timing was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the patients were classified into lung-molGPA0-2 and lung-molGPA2.5-4 group. Upfront CRT was defined as received CRT within 3 months after initial diagnosis and without BM progression, other CRT was classified into deferred CRT.

RESULTS

Overall, 288 patients were enrolled in our study, 156 patients received CRT. The median follow-up time was 47 months. In the entire cohort, the median PFS and OS were 9.2 and 17.0 months, respectively. In the lung-molGPA2.5-4 group, CRT can bring significantly overall survival benefit for NSCLC patients with initial BM (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.34-0.68, P < 0.0001), and the upfront CRT can further expand this survival benefits compared with deferred CRT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.27-0.89, P = 0.0026). But this phenomenon was not observed in lung-molGPA0-2 group patients.

CONCLUSION

Upfront CRT could bring significantly overall survival benefit for these patients with lung-molGPA2.5-4 but not for patients with lung-molGPA0-2.

Outcome differences between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-based monotherapy and combination treatments in NSCLC with brain metastases

INTRODUCTION

Without the clear immunophenotyping of brain metastases (BrMs), the optimal treatment strategy based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and BrMs remains unknown.

METHODS

308 patients with NSCLC received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based monotherapy or combination therapy were retrospectively identified. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests were used to determine the treatment outcomes differences. Transcriptomic analysis of paired primary lung lesions and BrMs were performed to dissect the specific tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of BrMs.

RESULTS

The presence of BrMs was associated with significantly inferior PFS (2.5 vs. 3.7 months; P = 0.0053) and OS (8.3 vs. 15.4 months; P = 0.0122) in monotherapy group, while it was only associated with poorer PFS (4.6 vs. 7.0 months; P = 0.0009) but similar OS (22.8 vs. 21.0 months; P = 0.9808) in combination treatment group. Of patients with BrMs, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus antiangiogenic therapy was associated with longest PFS (7.7 vs. 3.2 vs. 2.5 months; P = 0.0251) and OS (29.2 vs. 15.8 vs. 8.3 months; P = 0.0001) when compared with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Multivariate analyses suggested that combination treatment was independently correlated with significantly longer PFS (P = 0.028) and OS (P < 0.001) in patients with BrMs. Transcriptomic analysis showed a suppressive TIME in BrMs with decreased CD4⁺ T cells and M1 macrophages but increased M2 macrophages infiltration.

CONCLUSION

NSCLC with BrMs obtained barely satisfactory overall benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, partly due to its immunosuppressive TIME. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination treatment, especially anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-angiogenic treatment, could significantly improve the clinical outcomes of patients with NSCLC and BrMs.

Rationale and value of consolidative cranial local therapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients with baseline brain metastasis treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs

Objectives

To explore the rationale and value of consolidative cranial local therapy (CLT) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs).

Methods

EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with baseline BMs who received first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at two academic centers from May 2015 to June 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Patterns of tumor response and treatment failure were extensively analyzed in order to explore the rationale of CLT. Cranial lesions with number ⩽3 and largest tumor size ⩽3 cm at baseline and best response to EGFR-TKIs were defined as oligo-BMs and oligo-residual cranial disease (ORCD), respectively. To provide preliminary data supporting CLT, survival outcomes were compared in patients with ORCD, stratified by CLT status.

Results

Of the 216 patients enrolled, 57.1% had oligo-BMs and 24.5% received first-line osimertinib. At best response to the first-line EGFR-TKIs, intracranial complete response, partial response, and stable disease occurred in 18.5, 31.9, and 44.4% of the whole population, respectively. For patients without CLT (n = 193), ORCD was observed in 78.1% of the 105 patients with baseline oligo-BMs and 10.2% of the 88 patients with baseline multiple-BMs. With a median follow-up of 22.8 months, 107 patients had cranial first progressive disease (PD); more than 60% developed their first PD solely from the residual tumor sites at best response to EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, among patients with ORCD (n = 108), patients who received CLT (n = 17) achieved significantly longer progression-free survival (13.4 versus 8.5 months, p = 0.001) and overall survival (58.9 versus 28.8 months, p = 0.021) than those without CLT. Meanwhile, CLT remained as an independent prognostic factor associated with improved survival after Cox regression analyses.

Conclusions

Cranial progressive disease developed mostly at the residual cranial lesions in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with baseline BMs who received first-line EGFR-TKIs. Consolidative cranial local therapy targeting the oligo-residual cranial tumor lesions may provide survival benefit, which warrants future validation.

Prognostic value of cell-free DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from lung cancer patients with brain metastases during radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

During the last decades, radiotherapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) has been developed. However, the lack of predictive biomarkers for therapeutic responses has limited the precision treatment in NSCLC-BM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In order to find the predictive biomarkers for RT, we investigated the influence of RT on the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the frequency of T cell subsets of NSCLC patients with BM. A total of 19 patients diagnosed as NSCLC with BM were enrolled. The CSF from 19 patients and matched plasma samples from 11 patients were collected before RT, during RT, and after RT. The cfDNA from CSF and plasma were extracted, and the cerebrospinal fluid tumor mutation burden (cTMB) was calculated after through next-generation sequencing. The frequency of T cell subsets in peripheral blood was using flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The detection rate of cfDNA was higher in CSF compared to plasma in the matched samples. The mutation abundance of cfDNA in CSF was decreased after RT. However, no significant difference was observed in cTMB before and after RT. Although the median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) has not yet been reached in patients with decreased or undetectable cTMB, there was a trend that these patients possessed longer iPFS compared to those with stable or increased cTMB (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-1.18, P = 0.067). The proportion of CD4⁺T cells in peripheral blood was decreased after RT.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that cTMB can serve as a prognostic biomarker in NSCLC patients with BMs.

The Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis: A Meta-Analysis

Aim

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of afatinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis based on meta-analysis.

Methods

Related literatures were searched in the following databases: EMbase, PubMed, China Knowledge Network (CNKI), Wanfang, Weipu, Google Scholar, the China Biomedical Literature Service System, and other databases. Clinical trials and observational studies that met the requirements were selected for meta-analysis using Revman 5.3. The hazard ratio (HR) was used as an indicator of the impact of afatinib.

Results

A total of 142 related literatures were acquired, but after screening, five literatures were selected for data extraction. The following indices were compared: the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and common adverse reactions (ARs) of grade 3 and above. A total of 448 patients with brain metastases were included and were divided into two groups: the control group (no afatinib treatment, with chemotherapy alone and the first-generation EGFR-TKIs) and the afatinib group. The results showed that afatinib could improve PFS (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-0.85, P < 0.05) and ORR (OR = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.45-2.57, P < 0.05), but had no benefit on OS (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.15-8.75, P > 0.05) and DCR (OR = 2.87, 95% CI: 0.97-8.48, P > 0.05). For the safety of afatinib, the incidence of grade-3-and-above ARs was low (HR: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.02, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Afatinib improves the survival of NSCLC patients with brain metastases and shows satisfactory safety.

The role of brain radiotherapy for EGFR- and ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is frequently complicated by central nervous system (CNS) metastases affecting patients' life expectancy and quality. At the present clinical trials including neurosurgery, radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments alone or in combination have provided controversial results. CNS involvement is even more frequent in NSCLC patients with EGFR activating mutations or ALK rearrangement suggesting a role of target therapy in the upfront treatment in place of loco-regionals treatments (i.e. RT and/or surgery). So far clinical research has not explored the potential role of accurate brain imaging (i.e. MRI instead of the routine total-body contrast CT and/or PET/CT staging) to identify patients that could benefit of local therapies. Moreover, for patients who require concomitant RT there are no clear guidelines on the timing of intervention with respect to innovative precision medicine approaches with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, ALK-inhibitors and/or immuno-oncological therapies. On this basis the present review describes the therapeutic strategies integrating medical and radiation oncology in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) adenocarcinoma with CNS involvement and EGFR activating mutations or ALK rearrangement.

Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy vs Gefitinib Alone in Untreated EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With Brain Metastases: The GAP BRAIN Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study

IMPORTANCE

Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the standard therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases. Several studies have shown that adding chemotherapy to EGFR-TKIs could improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC; however, the efficacy of these agents in patients with brain metastases remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed with platinum) compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This open-label prospective, multicenter, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 centers in China from January 13, 2016, to August 27, 2021. The median follow-up time was 21.1 months (IQR, 13.5-31.8 months). Patients with untreated confirmed brain metastases and EGFR-sensitive mutated NSCLC were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

The eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gefitinib plus chemotherapy or gefitinib alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was intracranial PFS; secondary end points included PFS, overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate, overall objective response rate, and safety. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients (87 [54.0%] women; mean [SD] age, 55 [9.8] years; range, 26-80 years) were enrolled and randomized to receive gefitinib (n = 81) or gefitinib plus chemotherapy (n = 80). The median intracranial PFS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 14.3-16.9 months) in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs 9.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-10.2 months) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.53; P < .001). Similarly, the median PFS was significantly longer with gefitinib plus chemotherapy than gefitinib alone (16.3; 95% CI, 14.4-18.2 months vs 9.5; 95% CI, 8.3-10.8 months; P < .001). Gefitinib plus chemotherapy had a better intracranial objective response rate (85.0%; 95% CI, 77.0%-93.0% vs 63.0%; 95% CI, 52.2%-73.7%; P = .002) and overall objective response rate (80.0%; 95% CI, 71.0%-89.0% vs 64.2%; 95% CI, 53.5%-74.9%; P = .03) than gefitinib alone. At data cutoff, the median OS was also significantly longer in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs the gefitinib group (35.0 vs 28.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.99; P = .04). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common with gefitinib plus chemotherapy, most of which were manageable.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved intracranial PFS, PFS, and OS compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases and could be an optional first-line treatment for these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01951469.

Natural history of lung squamous cell brain metastases in patients treated with radiosurgery: a thirty-year experience at a tertiary medical center

PURPOSE

In this study we report our 30-year experience in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) brain metastases (BMs). It will serve to provide detailed longitudinal outcomes and predictors of efficacy in treating LUSC-BMs with SRS.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients and 109 tumors treated with SRS at our center between 1993 and 2022. Patient demographics, PDL1 genotype, immunotherapy use and mortality cause were recorded. Radiological and clinical outcomes were followed at 1-3-month intervals post-SRS. Cox-regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were performed in statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We included 37 male and 14 female patients (median age 62.7 years at BM diagnosis). Median overall survival (OS) time was 6.9 months, 6-month OS rate was 62.1%, and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) was the only independent predictor. Median time for local control maintenance was 7.6 months, 6-month local control rate was 69.1%, with TKI as the only independent predictor. Median time to distant failure was 5.13 months, 6-month distant failure rate was 51.1%, and factors with significant impact included gender (p = 0.002), presence of extracranial metastases (p < 0.001), use of immunotherapy(p < 0.001), PDL1 genotype (p = 0.034), and total intracranial metastases number (p = 0.008). However, no definitive benefits of immunotherapy were identified in patients with higher PDL1 mutational tumors.

CONCLUSION

In this study we defined the natural history of disease progression and outcomes in SRS-treated LUSC-BM patients. We also identified predictors of OS and tumor control among these patients. The findings of this study will serve as a guide when counseling these patients for SRS.

EGFR mutant status and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors affect the GKRS outcomes for NSCLC brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the first-line treatment for EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its applicability to patients with wild-type NSCLC remains an issue of contention. This study compared the effects of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) alone versus combining GKRS and TKIs in treating two genetic forms of NSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 479 NSCLC patients with 1982 brain metastases who underwent GKRS and for whom imaging follow-up data or death records were available. All our patients were consecutive. All gene mutations were confirmed by lung biopsy. The three main endpoints in this study were overall survival (OS), local intracranial tumor control (LC), and distal intracranial tumor control (DC).

RESULTS

There were 296 NSCLC patients with EGFR positive: TKI treatment (n = 262) and without TKI treatment (n = 34). GKRS + TKIs was more effective than GKRS alone in terms of OS (HR 0.53, p = 0.085) and DC (HR 0.51, p < 0.001). There were 150 NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR: TKI treatment (n = 50) and without TKI treatment (n = 100). GKRS + TKIs was less effective than GKRS alone in terms of OS (HR 1.82, p = 0.049) and DC (HR: 1.40, p = 0.011). We observed no difference in terms of LC in both genetic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining GKRS with TKIs proved effective in EGFR positive NSCLC patients; however, we do not observe the similar results when combining GKRS with TKIs for patients with wild-type NSCLC.

Brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma: an overview of classical and novel treatment strategies

Background

The development of brain metastases is a common problem in patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Technological advances in surgery and radiotherapy have allowed greater local control. Moreover, the emergence of targeted therapies and immunotherapy with greater activity on the central nervous system than classical chemotherapy have given way to new strategies in the treatment of brain metastases. We review the current role of local treatments, surgery and radiotherapy, and the most effective combination strategies with the new systemic treatments.

Relevance for patients

Brain metastases frequently occur during the course of NSCLC. In recent years, a range of treatments have appeared, such as targeted treatments or immunotherapy, with greater activity at the brain level than classical chemotherapy. Radiotherapy treatment is also now much more conformal and ablative doses can be delivered to the volume of the metastatic area, providing greater local control and less neurological toxicity. However, surgery is still required in cases where anatomopathological specimens are needed and when compressive effects appear. An important challenge is how to combine these treatments to achieve the best control and minimise patients' neurological impairments, especially because of limited experience with the new target drugs, and the unknown toxicity of the different combinations. Future research should therefore focus on these areas in order to establish the best strategies for the treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.

Core tips

In this work, we intend to elucidate the best therapeutic options for patients diagnosed with brain metastases of NSCL, which include: surgery, WBRT, radiosurgery or systemic treatment, and the most effective combinations and timings of them, and the ones with the lowest associated toxicity.

Resistance to TKIs in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Mechanisms to New Therapeutic Strategies

Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in advanced mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) constitutes a therapeutic challenge. This review intends to summarize the existing knowledge about the mechanisms of resistance to TKIs in the context of EGFR mutant NSCLC and discuss its clinical and therapeutic implications. EGFR-dependent and independent molecular pathways have the potential to overcome or circumvent the activity of EGFR-targeted agents including the third-generation TKI, osimertinib, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. CNS metastases occur frequently in patients on EGFR-TKIs, due to the inability of first and second-generation agents to overcome both the BBB and the acquired resistance of cancer cells in the CNS. Newer-generation TKIs, TKIs targeting EGFR-independent resistance mechanisms, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates or combinations of TKIs with other TKIs or chemotherapy, immunotherapy and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors (anti-VEGFs) are currently in use or under investigation in EGFR mutant NSCLC. Liquid biopsies detecting mutant cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provide a window of opportunity to attack mutant clones before they become clinically apparent. Overall, EGFR TKIs-resistant NSCLC constitutes a multifaceted therapeutic challenge. Mapping its underlying mutational landscape, accelerating the detection of resistance mechanisms and diversifying treatment strategies are essential for the management of the disease.

Intracranial efficacy of alectinib in ALK-positive NSCLC patients with CNS metastases-a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Although alectinib had demonstrated promising intracranial efficacy in several clinical trials, data were limited on its CNS activity in real-world settings.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, ALK-positive NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM) or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from six hospitals in China were divided into three cohorts based on the treatment history before the administration of alectinib. ALK-TKI-naive patients were enrolled in cohort 1, cohort 2 included patients who experienced intracranial progression with or without extracranial progression after treatment with crizotinib, and cohort 3 included patients who developed progression only in CNS following treatment with other second-generation ALK-TKIs. The definition and evaluation of intracranial and extracranial lesions were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were eligible and included in our study (cohort 1: 20, cohort 2: 32, cohort 3: 13). For the overall population and patients with uncontrolled CNS metastases, similar intracranial response in CNS target lesions was observed: cohort 1: 81.8% and 80%; cohort 2: 76.5% and 86.7%; cohort 3: 42.8% and 33.3%. For patients in these three cohorts, 75% (6/8), 78.6% (11/14), and 83.3% (5/6) were reported to have significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms respectively. The number of patients who were in need of mannitol or corticosteroids decreased remarkably after the treatment of alectinib (p < 0.001), and there was also a steep fall-over in the number of patients with ECOG ≥2 points before and after the administration of alectinib (p = 0.003). All patients (8/8) diagnosed with LM ± BM experienced substantial alleviation in CNS-related symptoms. In cohort 1 and cohort 2, no significant difference in CNS-time to progression was found between patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic BM when treated with alectinib alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study substantiated the potent CNS activity of alectinib in real-world settings. Patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic BM could benefit from alectinib comparatively, which indicated that alectinib alone might defer the timing of local treatment. However, our results should be treated cautiously owing to limited sample size.

Integrated genomic and DNA methylation analysis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis is a common and lethal complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is mostly diagnosed only after symptoms develop, at which point very few treatment options are available. Therefore, patients who have an increased risk of developing brain metastasis need to be identified early. Our study aimed to identify genomic and epigenomic biomarkers for predicting brain metastasis risk in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

Paired primary lung tumor tissues and either brain metastatic tissues or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected from 29 patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. A control group comprising 31 patients with advanced NSCLC who died without ever developing CNS metastasis was also included. Somatic mutations and DNA methylation levels were examined through capture-based targeted sequencing with a 520-gene panel and targeted bisulfite sequencing with an 80,672 CpG panel.

RESULTS

Compared to primary lung lesions, brain metastatic tissues harbored numerous unique copy number variations. The tumor mutational burden was comparable between brain metastatic tissue (P = 0.168)/CSF (P = 0.445) and their paired primary lung tumor samples. Kelch-like ECH-associated protein (KEAP1) mutations were detected in primary lung tumor and brain metastatic tissue samples of patients with brain metastasis. KEAP1 mutation rate was significantly higher in patients with brain metastasis than those without (P = 0.031). DNA methylation analysis revealed 15 differentially methylated blocks between primary lung tumors of patients with and without CNS metastasis. A brain metastasis risk prediction model based on these 15 differentially methylated blocks had an area under the curve of 0.94, with 87.1% sensitivity and 82.8% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses revealed 15 differentially methylated blocks in primary lung tumor tissues, which can differentiate patients with and without CNS metastasis. These differentially methylated blocks may serve as predictive biomarkers for the risk of developing CNS metastasis in NSCLC. Additional larger studies are needed to validate the predictive value of these markers.

Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

Overall survival benefit of Osimertinib and clinical value of upfront cranial local therapy in untreated EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis

Osimertinib, as a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), showed more potent efficacy against brain metastasis (BM) in untreated EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the FLAURA study. However, the overall survival (OS) benefit of Osimertinib and clinical value of cranial local therapy (CLT) in these patients remain undetermined. Here we conducted a retrospective study involving untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with BMs receiving first-line osimertinib or first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Upfront CLT was defined as CLT performed before disease progression to the first-line EGFR-TKIs. Pattern of treatment failure and survival outcomes were extensively investigated. Among the 367 patients enrolled, first-generation EGFR-TKI was administered in 265, osimertinib in 102 and upfront CLT performed in 140. Patients receiving osimertinib had more (p<0.001) and larger BMs (p=0.003) than those receiving first-generation EGFR-TKIs. After propensity score matching (PSM), osimertinib was found to prolong OS (37.7 months vs. 22.2 months, p=0.027). Pattern of failure analyses found that 51.8% of the patients without upfront CLT developed their initial progressive disease (PD) in the brain and 59.0% of the cranial PD occurred at the original sites alone, suggesting potential clinical value of upfront CLT. Indeed, upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and/or surgery was associated with improved OS among those receiving first-generation EGFR-TKIs (p=0.019) and those receiving osimertinib (p=0.041). In summary, compared with first-generation EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib is associated with improved OS in untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC with BMs. Meanwhile, upfront SRS and/or surgery may provide extra survival benefit, which needs to be verified in future studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Therapeutic effect of osimertinib plus cranial radiotherapy compared to osimertinib alone in NSCLC patients with EGFR-activating mutations and brain metastases: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to compare the efficacy of osimertinib plus cranial radiotherapy (RT) with osimertinib alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

The clinical data of advanced NSCLC patients with BMs who received osimertinib were retrospectively collected. The patients were assigned to one of the two groups according to the therapeutic modality used: the osimertinib monotherapy group or the osimertinib plus RT group.

RESULTS

This was a retrospective study and 61 patients were included from December 2015 to August 2020. Forty patients received osimertinib monotherapy, and twenty-one patients received osimertinib plus RT. Radiotherapy included whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT, n = 14), WBRT with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT-SIB, n = 5) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS, n = 2). The median number of prior systemic therapies in the two groups was one. Intracranial and systemic ORR and DCR were not significantly different between the two groups. No difference in iPFS was observed between the two groups (median iPFS: 16.67 vs. 13.50 months, P = 0.836). The median OS was 29.20 months in the osimertinib plus RT group compared with 26.13 months in the osimertinib group (HR = 0.895, P = 0.826). In the L858R mutational subgroup of 31 patients, the osimertinib plus RT group had a longer OS (P = 0.046). In the exon 19 deletion mutational subgroup of 30 patients, OS in the osimertinib alone group was longer than that in the osimertinib plus RT group (P = 0.011). The incidence of any-grade adverse events was not significantly different between the osimertinib plus RT group and the osimertinib alone group (47.6% vs. 32.5%, P = 0.762). However, six patients (28.5%) experienced leukoencephalopathy in the osimertinib plus RT group, and 50% (3/6) of the leukoencephalopathy was greater than or equal to grade 3.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic effect of osimertinib with RT was similar to that of osimertinib alone in EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with BM. However, for patients with the L858R mutation, osimertinib plus RT could provide more benefit than osimertinib alone.

Effect of brain radiotherapy strategies on prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis

Purpose

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers have a high risk of developing brain metastases (BM). Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), local radiotherapy, and WBRT + Boost are frequently used for treatment of BM. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the difference in efficacy of these radiotherapy modes in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with BMs. Further, we determined the optimal radiotherapy regimen for patients based on Lung-molGPA.

Methods and materials

We retrospectively enrolled 232 patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with BMs. Patients were divided into three groups based on the different modes of brain radiotherapy: WBRT group, local radiotherapy group, and WBRT + Boost group. Graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung molGPA), overall survival (OS), and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were calculated. Kaplan–Meier was used to compare iPFS and OS in different groups.

Results

The median OS for the WBRT (n = 84), local radiotherapy (n = 65), and WBRT + Boost (n = 83) cohorts was 32.8, 59.1, and 41.7 months, respectively (P = 0.0002). After stratification according to the Lung-molGPA score, the median OS for the WBRT (n = 56), local radiotherapy (n = 19), and WBRT + Boost (n = 28) cohorts was 32.5, 30.9, and 30.8 months, respectively, in subgroup with score 1–2 (P = 0.5097). In subgroup with score 2.5–4, the median OS for the WBRT (n = 26), local radiotherapy (n = 45), and WBRT + Boost (n = 54) cohorts was 32, 68.4, and 51 months, respectively (P = 0.0041).

Conclusion

The present study showed that in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with BM, local radiotherapy and WBRT + Boost perform similarly well both in the subgroups with low and high scores of Lung-molGPA. Considering the side effect caused by whole brain radiotherapy, we recommended local radiotherapy as optimal brain radiation mode for those subtype lung cancer patients.

The Sequence of Intracranial Radiotherapy and Systemic Treatment With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Gene-Driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases in the Targeted Treatment Era: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience

Purpose

The high intracranial efficacy of targeted therapeutic agents poses a challenge in determining the optimal sequence of local radiation therapy (RT) and systemic treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM). Therefore, we conducted a cohort study to elucidate the appropriate treatment strategy, either upfront RT or deferred RT including a toxicity assessment, in these patients.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated patients with gene-driven BMs from a single institution and divided them into deferred and upfront RT groups. Survival was estimated using a log-rank test. Intracranial progression was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risks model. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed for multivariable analysis in the entire group and subgroups.

Results

Among the 198 eligible patients, 94 and 104 patients received deferred and upfront RT, respectively. The upfront RT group showed a lower intracranial progression risk with an adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratios of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.30–0.57) than did the deferred RT group (median intracranial progression-free survival [iPFS], 19.9 months vs. 11.1 months; p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS; 43.2 months vs. 49.1 months, p = 0.377) and BM-specific survival (92.1 months vs. 82.9 months, p = 0.810) after salvage therapy were not significantly different between the upfront and deferred groups. Among patients with progressed extracranial disease, the deferred RT group showed significantly better OS than did the upfront RT group (44.0 vs. 28.1 months, p = 0.022). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were rare, and similar toxicities were observed between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared to the deferred RT group, the upfront RT group achieved longer iPFS and similar survival outcomes in most patients with gene-driven NSCLC BM, although patients with progression of extracranial disease might benefit from deferred RT. Both groups showed well-tolerated toxicities.

Trial registration ID

NCT04832672.

Value and significance of brain radiation therapy during first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR sensitive mutation and synchronous brain metastasis: Appropriate timing and technique

Background

For lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitive mutation and synchronous brain metastasis (syn‐BM), when and how to apply radiotherapy (RT) during first‐line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment remains debatable.

Methods

From a real‐world multicenter database, EGFR‐mutant patients with syn‐BM diagnosed between 2010–2020 and treated with first‐line TKIs were enrolled and divided into upfront TKI + RT and upfront TKI groups. Median intracranial progression‐free survival (mIC‐PFS), median overall survival (mOS), and their risk factors were estimated.

Results

There were 60 and 186 patients in the upfront TKI + RT group and upfront TKI group, respectively. Their mIC‐PFS were 28.9 months (m) and 17.5 m (p = 0.023), and mOS were 42.7 m and 40.1 m (p = 0.51). Upfront brain RT improved mIC‐PFS in patients ≤60‐year‐old (p = 0.035), with symptomatic BM (p = 0.002), and treated with first‐generation TKIs (p = 0.012). There was no significant difference in mOS in any subgroup. Upfront brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) showed a trend of better mIC‐PFS and mOS. mIC‐PFS was independently correlated with symptomatic BM (HR = 1.54, p = 0.030), EGFR L858R mutation (HR = 1.57, p = 0.019), and upfront brain RT (HR = 0.47, p = 0.001). mOS was independently correlated with being female (HR = 0.54, p = 0.007), ECOG 3–4 (HR = 10.47, p < 0.001), BM number>3 (HR = 2.19, p = 0.002), and third‐generation TKI (HR = 0.54, p = 0.044) or antiangiogenic drugs (HR = 0.11, p = 0.005) as first/second‐line therapy.

Conclusions

Upfront brain RT based on first‐line EGFR‐TKI might improve IC‐PFS but not OS in EGFR‐mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients, indicating potential survival benefit from brain SRS and early application of drugs with higher intracranial activity.

Hype or hope - Can combination therapies with third-generation EGFR-TKIs help overcome acquired resistance and improve outcomes in EGFR-mutant advanced/metastatic NSCLC?

Three generations of epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have been developed for treating advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR-activating mutations, while a fourth generation is undergoing preclinical assessment. Although initially effective, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs usually arises within a year due to the emergence of clones harboring multiple resistance mechanisms. Therefore, the combination of EGFR-TKIs with other therapeutic agents has emerged as a potential strategy to overcome resistance and improve clinical outcomes. However, results obtained so far are ambiguous and ideal therapies for patients who experience disease progression during treatment with EGFR-TKIs remain elusive. This review provides an updated landscape of EGFR-TKIs, along with a description of the mechanisms causing resistance to these drugs. Moreover, it discusses the current knowledge, limitations, and future perspective regarding the use of EGFR-TKIs in combination with other anticancer agents, supporting the need for bench-to-bedside approaches in selected populations.

Brain Metastases in EGFR- and ALK-Positive NSCLC: Outcomes of Central Nervous System-Penetrant Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Alone Versus in Combination With Radiation

INTRODUCTION

Management of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with driver-mutated NSCLC has traditionally incorporated both tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and intracranial radiation. Whether next generation, CNS-penetrant TKIs can be used alone without upfront radiation, however, remains unknown. This multi-institutional retrospective analysis aimed to compare outcomes in patients with EGFR- or ALK-positive NSCLC who received CNS-penetrant TKI therapy alone versus in combination with radiation for new or progressing intracranial metastases.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from three academic institutions. Two treatment groups (CNS-penetrant TKI alone versus TKI + CNS radiation therapy) were compared for both EGFR- and ALK-positive cohorts. Outcome variables included time to progression, time to intracranial progression, and time to treatment failure, measured from the date of initiation of CNS-penetrant TKI therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were included (EGFR n = 94, ALK n = 52, both n = 1). In patients receiving radiation, larger metastases, neurologic symptoms, and receipt of steroids were more common. There were no significant differences between TKI and CNS radiation therapy plus TKI groups for any of the study outcomes, including time to progression (8.5 versus 6.9 mo, p = 0.13 [EFGR] and 11.4 versus 13.4 mo, p = 0.98 [ALK]), time to intracranial progression (14.8 versus 20.5 mo, p = 0.51 [EGFR] and 18.1 versus 21.8 mo, p = 0.65 [ALK]), or time to treatment failure (13.8 versus 8.6 mo, p = 0.26 [EGFR] and 13.5 versus 23.2 mo, p = 0.95 [ALK]).

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide preliminary evidence that intracranial activity of CNS-penetrant TKIs may enable local radiation to be deferred in appropriately selected patients without negatively affecting progression.

Management of Intracranial Metastases in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: A Review of Literature following an Unusual Case Report

The arrival of subsequent generations of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly broaden the EGFR-mutated lung cancer therapeutic landscape. Results from the FLAURA clinical trial have pushed osimertinib to the first-line treatment for patients with advanced-stage disease, showing outstanding control rates of intracranial metastases, considerably higher than those of the first and second-generation EGFR TKIs. A progressively better knowledge of short and long-term neurocognitive side effects of radiotherapy, as well as the lack of evidence about the benefit of its combination with TKIs, has opened a debate about its indication at diagnosis of intracranial disease, at least before the response to targeted therapy has been evaluated. However, there is a small percentage of primarily resistant cases to osimertinib, mainly due to histologic transformation, acquired EGFR mutations and off-target genetic resistances that lead to a scenery of poor clinical prognosis in which radiotherapy may have a higher relevance for the management of brain metastases. We offer a review of the current recommendations for the management of intracranial metastases in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and the resistance mechanisms to third-generation TKIs, following the report of an unusual clinical case with a rapid progression to osimertinib.

Clinical Value of Upfront Cranial Radiation Therapy in Osimertinib-Treated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

As a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), osimertinib has a powerful ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and a high potency for controlling brain metastases (BMs) from EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The clinical value of cranial radiation therapy in osimertinib-treated NSCLC with BMs remains largely unknown.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with NSCLC and BMs and receiving osimertinib treatment as the standard of care were retrospectively enrolled from 2 institutions. Cranial radiation therapy (RT; whole-brain radiation therapy [WBRT] or/and stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]) performed before disease progression (PD) to osimertinib was categorized as upfront cranial radiation therapy (ucRT group), excluding those treatments performed during prior EGFR-TKI treatment. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the time to intracranial progression (iTTP) were compared between the 2 groups, with adjustment by covariates in propensity-score matched (PSM) analyses. The state of having 1 to 3 BM lesions, with a maximal size of ≤3 cm, was defined as having oligo-BM; otherwise; the cases were defined as having multiple BMs.

RESULTS

Of the 205 patients enrolled, osimertinib was used as first-line therapy in 74 and second-line therapy in 131. There were 48 patients who received ucRTs, including WBRT in 24 and SRS in 24. All patients with oligo-BM in the ucRT group received SRS alone (n = 17), whereas most (n = 28; 90.3%) patients with multiple BMs received WBRT. Failure pattern analyses indicated that in the non-ucRT group, 40.2% of the initial PD involved the brain and 76.9% of the cranial PD involved the original sites, indicating the potential roles of ucRT. Indeed, the iTTP was significantly prolonged (P = .010) in the ucRT group among the whole population. In the PSM oligo-BM cohort, the ucRT group showed superior PFS (P = .033) and OS (P = .026) compared with the non-ucRT group, and the differences remained after multivariate Cox analyses. No such differences were observed in the subpopulation with multiple BMs.

CONCLUSIONS

In osimertinib-treated NSCLC patients with BMs, oligo-BM status could be used as a potential factor to select patients for upfront cranial RT. Further investigation by well-designed clinical trials is warranted.

The Efficacy of First-Generation EGFR-TKI Combined With Brain Radiotherapy as the First-Line Treatment for Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With Brain Metastases and EGFR Sensitive Mutations: A Retrospective study

Background:

It was controversial that whether LUAD patients with brain metastases (BMs) and EGFR sensitive mutations should be conducted using brain radiotherapy when treated with first-generation EGFR-TKI. Herein, a retrospective study was designed to compare the efficacy of first-generation EGFR-TKI combined with brain radiotherapy and EGFR-TKI alone as first-line treatment for these LUAD patients.

Patients and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed the status of patients with advanced LUAD carrying EGFR sensitive mutations who received first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment in our center. iPFS was the first time of intracranial progression or death from the diagnosis of BMs, PFS was the time of progression of any site or death from the diagnosis of BMs, and OS was the time of confirmed BMs to death or the last follow-up time. Differences in characteristics between groups were compared using the Chi-square test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the iPFS, PFS, and OS. Univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and subgroup analysis were conducted by Cox regression model.

Results:

There were 77 patients (77/134, 57.5%) in the TKI + RT group and 57 patients (57/134, 42.5%) in the TKI group. TKI + RT group had a significant higher intracranial ORR and DCR, and the combination therapy was independently significantly associated with a longer iPFS (18.9 vs. 10.5 months, P = 0.0009), systematic PFS (12.5 vs. 8.4 months, P = 0.0071) and OS (30.8 vs. 22.7 months, P = 0.0183). Females, non-smokers, and younger patients benefited more from the combination therapy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the combination therapy could improve the iPFS in patients with more than 3 BMs (P = 0.005); however, it couldn’t improve the OS for these patients.

Conclusion:

Our study confirmed the effect of the combination of EGFR-TKI and brain radiotherapy as first-line treatment for LUAD patients with BMs and EGFR sensitive mutations.

High discrepancy in thrombotic events in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different genomic alterations

Background

Acute complications, such as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are common in patients with advanced severe lung cancers. However, current VTE risk scores cannot adequately identify high-risk patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study proposed to elucidated the incidence of thromboembolism (TE) in patients with different oncogenic aberrations and the impact of these aberrations on the efficacy of targeted therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Methods

A systemic review was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to evaluate the incidence of TE in different molecular subtypes of NSCLC. Data from patients diagnosed of advanced NSCLC who harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) or ROS proto-oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) rearrangements since 2016 to 2019 were also retrospectively collected. A meta-analysis with random-effects model, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed. The principal summary measure was incidence of thrombotic events in NSCLC patients. And the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy was compared between the two subgroups.

Results

A total of 5,767 cases from 20 studies were included in the analysis of the incidence of thrombosis in patients with different oncogenic alterations. The pooled analysis showed a higher risk of thrombosis in ROS1-fusion types (41%, 95% CI: 35-47%) and ALK-fusion types (30%, 95% CI: 24-37%) than in EGFR-mutation (12%, 95% CI: 8-17%), KRAS-mutation (25%, 95% CI: 13-50%), and wild-type (14%, 95% CI: 10-20%) cases. A high prevalence of thrombosis (ALK: 24.4%; ROS1: 32.6%) was observed in the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH) cohort of 224 patients with ALK or ROS1 fusion. Furthermore, patients with embolism had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) after TKI therapy than those without embolism, both in the ALK+ cohort (5.6 vs. 12.9 months, P<0.0001) and in the ROS1+ cohort (9.6 vs. 17.6 months, P=0.0481).

Conclusions

NSCLC patients with ALK/ROS1 rearrangements are more likely to develop thrombosis than patients with other oncogenic alterations. Thrombosis may also be associated with an inferior response and PFS after TKI therapy.

Characterization of evolution trajectory and immune profiling of brain metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma

Characterizing the evolutionary trajectory and immune profiling of brain metastasis (BM) may provide insights in the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Here, we performed whole-exome sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence (MIF) of 40 samples from 12 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients with BM and compared to their paired primary tumors. We observed significantly higher intertumor heterogeneity between paired primary tumors and BMs, with only a median of 8.3% of genetic mutations identified as shared. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that BM-competent clones genetically diverged from their primary tumors at relatively early stage, suggesting that the parallel progression model is dominant. In cases with synchronous lymph node metastasis (LNM), phylogenetic analysis suggested that BM is a later event than LNM. MIF analysis found that BMs exhibited significantly lower CD8+ T cell infiltration (P = 0.048), and elevated CD4+Foxp3+ T cell infiltration (P = 0.036) and PD-1 expression (P = 0.047) in comparison to the matched primary tumors, indicating an immunosuppressive microenvironment in BMs. The current study revealed the discrepancy of mutational landscape as well as tumor immune microenvironment between BM and its primary tumor - such findings shall help us better understand the unique biological features of BM and develop innovative strategies accordingly for our patients with LUAD.

Treatment of Brain Metastases of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant neoplasms. As a result of the disease's progression, patients may develop metastases to the central nervous system. The prognosis in this location is unfavorable; untreated metastatic lesions may lead to death within one to two months. Existing therapies-neurosurgery and radiation therapy-do not improve the prognosis for every patient. The discovery of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) rearrangements in patients with non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma has allowed for the introduction of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors to the treatment of advanced-stage patients. The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane protein with tyrosine kinase-dependent activity. EGFR is present in membranes of all epithelial cells. In physiological conditions, it plays an important role in the process of cell growth and proliferation. Binding the ligand to the EGFR causes its dimerization and the activation of the intracellular signaling cascade. Signal transduction involves the activation of MAPK, AKT, and JNK, resulting in DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. In cancer cells, binding the ligand to the EGFR also leads to its dimerization and transduction of the signal to the cell interior. It has been demonstrated that activating mutations in the gene for EGFR-exon19 (deletion), L858R point mutation in exon 21, and mutation in exon 20 results in cancer cell proliferation. Continuous stimulation of the receptor inhibits apoptosis, stimulates invasion, intensifies angiogenesis, and facilitates the formation of distant metastases. As a consequence, the cancer progresses. These activating gene mutations for the EGFR are present in 10-20% of lung adenocarcinomas. Approximately 3-7% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma have the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)/ALK fusion gene. The fusion of the two genes EML4 and ALK results in a fusion gene that activates the intracellular signaling pathway, stimulates the proliferation of tumor cells, and inhibits apoptosis. A new group of drugs-small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors-has been developed; the first generation includes gefitinib and erlotinib and the ALK inhibitor crizotinib. These drugs reversibly block the EGFR by stopping the signal transmission to the cell. The second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) afatinib or ALK inhibitor alectinib block the receptor irreversibly. Clinical trials with TKI in patients with non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma with central nervous system (CNS) metastases have shown prolonged, progression-free survival, a high percentage of objective responses, and improved quality of life. Resistance to treatment with this group of drugs emerging during TKI therapy is the basis for the detection of resistance mutations. The T790M mutation, present in exon 20 of the EGFR gene, is detected in patients treated with first- and second-generation TKI and is overcome by Osimertinib, a third-generation TKI. The I117N resistance mutation in patients with the ALK mutation treated with alectinib is overcome by ceritinib. In this way, sequential therapy ensures the continuity of treatment. In patients with CNS metastases, attempts are made to simultaneously administer radiation therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients with lung adenocarcinoma with CNS metastases, without activating EGFR mutation and without ALK rearrangement, benefit from immunotherapy. This therapeutic option blocks the PD-1 receptor on the surface of T or B lymphocytes or PD-L1 located on cancer cells with an applicable antibody. Based on clinical trials, pembrolizumab and all antibodies are included in the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma with CNS metastases.

Radiotherapy in combination with systemic therapies for brain metastases: current status and progress

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common cause of intracranial neoplasms in adults with poor prognosis. Most BMs originate from lung cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma. Radiotherapy (RT), including whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS), has been widely explored and is considered a mainstay anticancer treatment for BMs. Over the past decade, the advent of novel systemic therapies has revolutionized the treatment of BMs. In this context, there is a strong rationale for using a combination of treatments based on RT, with the aim of achieving both local disease control and extracranial disease control. This review focuses on describing the latest progress in RT as well as the synergistic effects of the optimal combinations of RT and systemic treatment modalities for BMs, to provide perspectives on current treatments.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Can Improve the Survival of Patients with Multiple Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Objective

To observe whether whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can bring survival benefits to patients with multiple brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and determine the best time for WBRT intervention.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 148 patients diagnosed with EGFR gene-mutated NSCLC. All patients had multiple BM and received EGFR-TKI targeted therapy, which was performed to observe whether WBRT can bring survival benefits, and whether the choice of WBRT timing affects the survival of patients.

Results

Among the 148 patients with NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKI, 76 received WBRT; 72 were without WBRT. WBRT can reduce the intracranial progression rate in the patients (19.7% vs 33.3%, P=0.040), thus improving the intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) (median iPFS: 11.9 months versus 10.2 months, P=0.039) and overall survival (OS) (median OS: 21.0 months versus 16.7 months, P=0.043). Multivariate analysis showed that WBRT (HR=0.606; 95% CI: 0.403-0.912, P=0.016) and the low Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR=1.884; 95% CI: 1.120-3.170, P=0.017) are independent prognostic factors in all patients. Further subgroup analysis showed that the choice of WBRT time had no effect on patient survival.

Conclusion

WBRT can improve the survival of patients with multiple BM from NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI targeted therapy and is an independent prognostic factor. The choice of RT time has no effect on patient survival.

Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Initially Diagnosed With Brain Metastases in Real-World Clinical Practice

Background

This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients initially diagnosed with brain metastases (BMs) in real-world practice.

Methods

We enrolled NSCLC patients initially diagnosed with BMs between Jan 2004 and Jan 2018 in our institution. Patient demographics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were then analyzed. Brain localized treatment (BLT) included early brain radiotherapy (EBR), deferred brain radiotherapy (DBR), and surgery.

Results

A total of 954 patients were identified. Concerning initial treatment, 525 patients (55.0%) received systemic medication (SM)+BLT, 400 patients (41.9%) received SM only, and 29 patients received BLT only (3.0%). SM+BLT cohort was associated with longer median overall survival (mOS) than the SM only and the BLT only cohorts both in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative/unknown patients (15.3 months, 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.2–16.4; 11.1 months, 9.0–13.2; 7.0 months, 5.4–8.6; p<0.001) and in EGFR/ALK-positive patients (33.7 months, 28.5–38.9; 22.1 months, 17.8–26.4; 4.0 months, 3.6–4.4; p < 0.001). As for timing of radiotherapy, SM+EBR (14.1 months, 12.7–15.5) was associated with inferior mOS than SM+DBR (19.4 months, 14.2–24.6) in EGFR/ALK-negative/unknown patients. No significant difference was found in EGFR/ALK-positive patients (28.3 months, 19.1–37.5; 33.3 months, 28.1–38.5). Patients in the EGFR/ALK-negative/unknown cohort treated with first-line pemetrexed with platinum (PP) (15.8 months, 14.0–17.6, p<0.001) had longer mOS than those received non-PP regimens (13.1 months, 11.6–14.6). However, no difference was observed among EGFR/ALK-positive patients who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (29.5 months, 21.1–37.9; p = 0.140), PP (27.2 months, 21.6–32.8) and non-PP regimens (25.0 months, 16.0–34.0).

Conclusions

Our study confirmed that the use of SM+BLT is associated with superior mOS than those treated with SM only and BLT only. SM+DBR might be a better radiotherapeutic strategy for this patient population. EGFR/ALK-negative/unknown patients showed a survival benefit with PP treatment.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as a Treatment of Symptomatic CNS Metastases in Oncogene-Driven NSCLC

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases occur frequently in oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Standard treatment approaches can potentially delay systemic treatment (surgical intervention) or result in neurocognitive impairment (radiotherapy). Recently, next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated remarkable intracranial activity. However, most clinical trials did not enroll patients suffering neurological symptoms. Our study aimed to assess the CNS activity of targeted therapies in this patient population. We present a case series of nine NSCLC patients with either EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement and symptomatic CNS metastases that were treated with TKIs. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed. Most patients presented with symptomatic CNS metastases at time of metastatic disease presentation (6/9). Additionally, the majority of patients had leptomeningeal disease (6/9) and multiple parenchymal metastases. Patients presented with a variety of CNS symptoms with the most common being nausea, vomiting, headache, and confusion. Most patients (6/9) responded rapidly both clinically and radiographically to the targeted treatment, with a marked correlation between systemic and intracranial radiographic response. In conclusion, upfront use of next-generation TKIs in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC with symptomatic CNS metastases is associated with reasonable intracranial activity and represents a valuable treatment option.

[Treatment for Brain Metastases from EGFR Mutations NSCLC Patients: How Should We Choose in Clinical Practice?]

Brain metastasis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitive mutations is a hot and difficult point in targeted era of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, meanwhile it is also the central issue of controversy in the field of lung cancer treatment. Different results of different studies and different understanding of different disciplines, this field of treatment has been accompanied by different voices, patients without clinical symptoms can use targeted therapy first, and then start local radiotherapy with clinical symptoms or disease progression. It is a major model of the medical oncology. That is to say, taking symptoms and progress as indication and standard of local treatment intervention. In the absence of symptoms, local radiotherapy may increase patients' pain, which belongs to overtreatment. However, the perspective of radiotherapy is that brain metastases need to be treated clinically as early as possible, if not, it may affect the survival of patients. Early treatment of local lesions and increasing the depth of treatment are helpful to prolong the survival time of patients. This article refers to relevant literatures and summarizes the discussion from the perspective of pursuing the truth of disease treatment and problem solving in order to provide reference for patients' clinical practice.

A review of Osimertinib in NSCLC and pharmacist role in NSCLC patient care

Lung cancer is a complex, genetically heterogeneous disease. It is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the majority of the diagnosed lung cancer cases. Osimertinib is a new treatment option that demonstrated a superior efficacy over standard epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) or platinum-based chemotherapy. The safety and efficacy of osimertinib (a third generation EGFR-TKIs) were confirmed by well-designed clinical trials. Consequently, osimertinib was considered a first-line treatment option, particularly in patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC. It has been approved by FDA for the treatment of advance or metastatic NSCLC patients with specific EGFR-mutant NSCLC. As an active member of the multidisciplinary team, pharmacist has a promising role in assuring safe, effective and cost-effective treatment in patient with NSCLC. This review article aims to highlight the latest evidence about osimertinib use as a new treatment option in the clinical practice and to review the potential pharmacist key roles in NSCLC patient care.

Systemic treatment of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

Brain metastases (BrMs) are associated with significant morbidity and are found in up to 50% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most of the literature focuses on symptomatic BrMs, with a lack of baseline brain imaging in asymptomatic patients. Unfortunately, much of the data on local treatments with or without systemic treatment is retrospective. Clinical trials of systemic treatments largely exclude patients with BrMs. Chemotherapy is an active treatment for BrM with response rates in the brain similar to other sites of disease. Targeted systemic treatments in patients with driver mutations (EGFR and ALK-MET to date) have impressive central nervous system (CNS) penetrance and response rates. Unfortunately, no prospective data can currently guide the timings or modality of local therapies with systemic treatments in these patients who have a high incidence of CNS disease, but retrospective data suggest that early local therapies may give better intracranial progression-free survival (ICPFS). Recent immunotherapy trials have included patients with BrMs. These patients have largely been pre-treated with local therapies and are asymptomatic. Thus, the current standard is becoming, early local therapies before or in conjunction with immunotherapy agents. The approach seems to be safe. Prospective studies are needed in NSCLC BrMs patients to make sure any benefit from local therapies on the ICPFS and quality of life is not overlooked. Here we report what we think are reasonable conclusions from the available data and make suggestions for future clinical trials in the management of NSCLC BrMs.

Outcomes according to initial and subsequent therapies following intracranial progression in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer and brain metastasis

In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases, it remains controversial whether the use of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) alone without radiotherapy (RT) is an optimal approach. Here, we investigated the clinical outcomes according to the use of upfront RT as well as the subsequent therapy following intracranial progression. This single-centre retrospective study included a total of 173 patients who were treated with EGFR-TKI alone (TKI alone group) or with upfront whole-brain RT (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) followed by EGFR-TKI (RT plus TKI group). Clinical outcomes according to initial and subsequent therapies following intracranial progression were analysed. There was no significant difference in OS according to the use of upfront RT (TKI alone group, 24.5 months vs. WBRT group, 20.0 months vs. SRS group, 17.8 months; P = 0.186). Intracranial progression was found in 35 (32.7%) of 107 patients in the TKI alone group. Among them, 19 patients who received salvage RT had the better prognosis than others [median overall survival (OS); 28.6 vs. 11.2 months; P = 0.041]. In the RT plus TKI group, 12 (18.1%) of the 66 patients experienced intracranial progression and 3 of them received salvage RT (median OS; 37.4 vs. 20.0 months; P = 0.044). In multivariate analysis, upfront WBRT was associated with trends towards a lower probability of intracranial progression, whereas upfront SRS was found to be an independent risk factor for poor OS. In conclusion, using EGFR-TKI alone for brain metastasis in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients showed outcomes comparable to those using upfront RT followed by EGFR-TKI. Patients who could not receive salvage RT following intracranial progression had the worst survival regardless of the type of initial treatment.

Heterogeneity of neoantigen landscape between primary lesions and their matched metastases in lung cancer

Background

Personalized cancer vaccines based on tumor-derived neoantigens have shown strong and long-lasting antitumor effect in patients with some solid tumors. However, whether neoantigens identified from primary lesions could represent their metastatic lesions, and consequently the effect of vaccine therapy remained unknown.

Methods

To investigate whether neoantigens identified from primary tumors are similar to their matched metastases in lung cancer, we identified 79 samples from 24 cases. All of samples were collected before any systemic therapy. Major criteria for neoantigen identification included: derived from tumor-specific mutations, fold change >10 comparing to germline expression level, high predicted human leukocyte antigen (HLA) binding affinity and peptide of 9–11 amino acids in length.

Results

We found a wide range of tumor neoantigen burden in both primaries and metastases. The counts, overall distribution pattern and predicted HLA binding affinity of neoantigens were similar between primaries and metastases. However, only 20% of shared neoantigens (presented in both primaries and metastases) was observed, which were mainly derived from single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and fusions. A variety of corresponding HLA alleles were observed and 50.0% of cases were HLA-C*06:02. Finally, we observed the neoantigen intrametastases homogeneity in patients with sole brain metastases.

Conclusions

Neoantigen landscape in terms of the number, type and predicted HLA binding affinity was similar between primaries and metastases, but the percentage of shared neoantigens is only modest, suggesting vaccine development based solely on primary tumor neoantigen may not offer optimal therapeutic outcome, and shared neoantigen needs to be seriously considered.

Management and Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A Real-World Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are one of the strongest negative prognostic factors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecularly targeted agents are standard of care for NSCLC patients with a driver mutation; however, their efficacy in patients with BM is not fully understood because patients with BM are usually excluded from clinical studies. This study investigated the current management and outcomes of newly diagnosed NSCLC patients with BM in Japanese clinical practice, focusing on their driver mutation status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve NSCLC patients with BM between January 2012 and December 2015 from 4 institutions in Japan. The medical records of each patient were retrospectively reviewed, and the treatment details and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 203 patients with BM were enrolled in this study and 73 (36%) were neurologically symptomatic. Regarding initial treatment, 110 patients (54%) received local therapy, including radiotherapy and surgery, whereas 77 (38%) received systemic therapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.3 months for all patients, and it was significantly longer among patients with a driver mutation (28.9 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.9-41.0) than among patients without a driver mutation (9.9 months; 95% CI, 7.0-13.4) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.57; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified performance status (HR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.16-2.72; p = 0.009) and driver mutation status (HR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.17-0.44; p < 0.001) as significant prognostic factors. No significant difference in OS was noted according to the type of initial treatment, i.e., local versus systemic.

CONCLUSION

The median OS of patients with a driver mutation was longer than 2 years, even of patients with BM, and it was significantly longer than that of patients without a driver mutation. Driver mutation status, in addition to performance status, was a significant prognostic factor in NSCLC patients with BM.

Complete Remission of Multiple Brain Metastases in a Patient with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line Osimertinib without Radiotherapy

Osimertinib has demonstrated efficacy against stable or asymptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials that allowed prior CNS radiotherapy. However, the efficacy of osimertinib only or the optimal treatment combination or sequence of radiotherapy has not been investigated. A 74-year-old woman diagnosed with T4N1M1c Stage IVB lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation presented with a left upper lobe mass and multiple bilateral lung metastases. A total of more than 20 asymptomatic multiple brain metastases with a maximum diameter of 12 mm were diagnosed simultaneously. Osimertinib was administered as first-line treatment. Whole brain radiotherapy was deferred because she had no neurological symptoms. After 5 weeks, the multiple brain metastases disappeared completely, together with the response in the lung lesions. This case demonstrated that first-line treatment with osimertinib could even achieve complete remission of multiple brain metastases comprising as many as twenty lesions of EGFR-mutated NSCLC without radiation therapy. Radiation therapy for brain metastases can be deferred or even withheld. A new treatment strategy for EGFR mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases should be investigated using osimertinib, especially regarding optimal combination or sequence of radiotherapy.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance Increased the Risk of Cerebral Radiation Necrosis After Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases of Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Case-Control Study

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the timing of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) intervention and the complications of cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) in patients with brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma who received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment.

Methods: A total of 361 targets from 257 patients with brain oligometastases of lung adenocarcinoma who received CyberKnife treatment between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively collected from three CyberKnife centers. The difference in brain necrosis between patients with or without TKI application was statistically counted. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the effect of applying TKI on the occurrence of CRN in patients and the effect of SRS before and after TKI resistance on CRN.

Results: The rate of CRN in the TKI group was significantly higher than that in the non-TKI group. The incidence of brain necrosis in patients undergoing SRS after drug resistance was significantly higher than that in patients undergoing SRS before drug resistance. Regression analysis showed that combination of TKI with SRS, and SRS after TKI resistance were important influencing factors for CRN.

Conclusion: Performing the SRS for brain metastases after TKI resistance worsened the occurrence of CRN of patients treated with TKI.

Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese clinical trial registry, http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=38395&htm=4, Registration number: ChiCTR1900022750.

Glycodelin As A Biomarker Of Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Brain Metastases In Patients Treated With EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Objective

Brain metastasis (BM) is a serious complication of advanced lung adenocarcinoma and is a prominent factor leading to lung cancer mortality. In this study, the expression of the glycodelin protein was analyzed in EGFR-mutant tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitive advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

This study features a retrospective analysis of 74 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated at our hospital from January 2010 to December 2017. The expressions of glycodelin were assessed by standard immunohistochemistry and correlated with clinicopathological factors and overall survival (OS) outcomes.

Results

Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with glycodelin overexpression were prone to BM (P < 0.05), and exhibited significantly shortened OS (11.8 months vs 20.4 months, P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that overexpression of glycodelin and brain metastases were independent factors affecting the prognosis of advanced lung adenocarcinoma (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The overexpression of glycodelin is closely related to the presence of brain metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma, and can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic index for prognosis of advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

The optional approach of oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases in the new generation targeted therapies era

In recent years, the study of the molecular characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has highlighted a specific role of some genes that represent important therapeutic targets, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS-1) and v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF). Patients with oncogene-addicted cancer benefit more from therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than from chemotherapy. The brain is a preferred site for tumor spread in these patients. In addition, given greater control of extracranial disease and prolonged survival, the brain is often the first site of progression. Therefore, there is great interest in therapeutic approaches that optimize the control of intracranial disease associated with systemic drugs that, by penetrating the blood-brain barrier (BBB), may improve local control. On the latter, radiotherapy provides excellent efficacy but following the results of clinical trials with new brain penetrant drugs, the question of how and especially when to perform brain radiotherapy in patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC remains open. Prospective studies may indicate which patients are most likely to benefit from combined use or in what sequence they will undergo systemic and radiotherapy treatment. Due to the heterogeneity of patients and the introduction of new generation TKIs, a multidisciplinary assessment for the best management of therapies in NSCLC patients with molecular driver alterations and brain metastases (BM) is required.

Neurological Death is Common in Patients With EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Diagnosed With Brain Metastases

Purpose

Brain metastases (BrM) are common in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRm) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to determine the rate of neurologic death (ND) in this population.

Methods and Materials

We analyzed data from 198 patients who received a diagnosis of BrM from EGFRm NSCLC between 2004 and 2016, comparing patients whose initial treatment for BrM was stereotactic radiosurgery with or without tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with or without TKI, or TKI alone. The incidence of ND was determined using a competing risks analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify clinical variables associated with this outcome.

Results

The percentage of patients who initially received stereotactic radiosurgery, whole brain radiation therapy, or TKI alone was 22%, 61%, and 17%, respectively. Median overall survival in these subgroups was 31.1, 14.6, and 24.6 months, respectively (P = .0016). The 5-year incidence of ND among all patients was 40% and did not significantly vary according to treatment group. In a multivariable model, only leptomeningeal disease at any point in a patient’s disease course significantly correlated with ND (hazard ratio 4.75, P <.001).

Conclusions

Among our cohort of patients with BrM from EGFRm NSCLC, the incidence of ND was significantly higher than suggested by previous reports. BrM should be considered a driver of mortality in many patients with EGFRm NSCLC, and treatments providing better control of BrM, lower neurocognitive side effects, and maintenance of quality of life are needed.

Effects of different brain surveillance strategies on outcomes for patients with EGFR-mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma under targeted therapy

OBJECTIVES

Brain metastasis (BM) is common in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer. However, the brain surveillance strategy during treatment in advanced lung cancer patients varies, and the impact on clinical outcome is unclear. Here we aimed to evaluate the effect of different brain surveillance strategies on the clinical characteristics and treatment outcome in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma treated with first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study conducted in a medical center in an area with high prevalence of EGFR mutation. Patients with initially diagnosed stage IV EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma were included. Patients undergoing regular brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 3-6 months were categorized in the regular follow-up (RFU) group, and the rest were categorized in the liberal follow-up (LFU) group. Clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients were included, and 43.5% initially had brain metastases. Patients in the LFU group were significantly older than those in the RFU group (median age: 67 vs 62, p < 0.001). The overall survival and time-to-treatment failure of patients with initial EGFR-TKIs treatment showed no statistical difference between the two groups. However, the intracranial progression free survival was significantly shorter in the RFU group than in the LFU group (p = 0.009). The risk of mortality was similar in the LFU and RFU groups. There was no difference in the intracranial progression patterns and cause of death between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients who used EGFR-TKIs as the frontline therapy, regular or liberal brain MRI follow-up showed no significant impact on the outcome, irrespective of initial brain metastasis.

Therapeutic Effect Of First-Line EGFR-TKIs Combined With Concurrent Cranial Radiotherapy On NSCLC Patients With EGFR Activating Mutation And Brain Metastasis: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation are suffering from a high incidence of brain metastasis (BM). It is still controversial whether cranial radiotherapy could be delayed when the EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used as first-line therapy for EGFR-positive patients with BM. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effect of TKIs combined with concurrent cranial radiotherapy on BM.

Patients and methods

NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation and BM were retrospectively analyzed from January 2013 to December 2016 in Shandong Cancer Hospital. Identified cases were treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs with or without concurrent cranial radiation.

Results

A total of 64 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, while 35 patients received first-line EGFR-TKIs plus cranial radiotherapy (RT+TKI group) and 29 patients received first-line EGFR-TKIs only (TKI alone group). The intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) of the RT+TKI group was significantly longer than the TKI alone group (25 vs 16 months; p=0.019), but no significant differences were observed between the two groups on extracranial PFS (20 vs 17 months, p=0.660). The median overall survival was also longer in the RT+TKI group (31 vs 24 months, p=0.019).

Conclusion

Our retrospective data suggest that first-line TKIs plus concurrent cranial radiotherapy is a promising therapeutic strategy that led to remarkable intracranial PFS improvement and survival benefits for EGFR-mutant NSCLC with BM. Hence, it should be considered as a crucial treatment method during clinical management.

EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab demonstrated survival benefit than EGFR-TKIs alone in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and multiple brain metastases

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies suggested that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) plus bevacizumab could significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) than EGFR-TKI alone as first-line setting for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether this combination could benefit patients with multiple brain metastases (BrMs) remains undetermined.

METHODS

A total of 208 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and multiple BrM (number >3, at least one of lesions was measurable) were retrospectively identified. Kaplan-Meier curves with two-sided log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards model with calculated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to determine the survival difference.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 149 patients received EGFR-TKIs monotherapy and 59 received EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab as first-line setting. EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab was associated with a significantly higher intracranial objective response rate (ORR, 66.1% vs. 41.6%, P = 0.001), systemic ORR (74.6% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.019), longer intracranial PFS (14.0 vs. 8.2 months; P < 0.001) and systemic PFS (14.4 vs. 9.0 months; P < 0.001). Importantly, addition of bevacizumab also had a significantly longer overall survival (OS, 29.6 vs. 21.7 months; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis consistently revealed that addition of bevacizumab was independently associated with prolonged intracranial and systemic PFS, and OS. No unexpected serious adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab prolonged not only PFS but also OS in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and multiple BrMs when compared with EGFR-TKIs alone, indicating that this combination could be an alternative therapeutic option for those patients.

Quantitative mathematical modeling of clinical brain metastasis dynamics in non-small cell lung cancer

Brain metastases (BMs) are associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but are only visible when large enough. Therapeutic decisions such as whole brain radiation therapy would benefit from patient-specific predictions of radiologically undetectable BMs. Here, we propose a mathematical modeling approach and use it to analyze clinical data of BM from NSCLC. Primary tumor growth was best described by a gompertzian model for the pre-diagnosis history, followed by a tumor growth inhibition model during treatment. Growth parameters were estimated only from the size at diagnosis and histology, but predicted plausible individual estimates of the tumor age (2.1-5.3 years). Multiple metastatic models were further assessed from fitting either literature data of BM probability (n = 183 patients) or longitudinal measurements of visible BMs in two patients. Among the tested models, the one featuring dormancy was best able to describe the data. It predicted latency phases of 4.4-5.7 months and onset of BMs 14-19 months before diagnosis. This quantitative model paves the way for a computational tool of potential help during therapeutic management.

Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs with or without upfront brain radiotherapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with central nervous system metastases

Background

Although the clinical efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) in EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has been demonstrated, their efficacy in EGFR‐mutant NSCLCs with central nervous system (CNS) metastases and the role of radiotherapy remain unclear. This study aimed to determine if it is preferable to add upfront cranial radiotherapy to EGFR‐TKIs in patients with EGFR‐mutant NSCLC with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients with CNS metastases who received EGFR‐TKIs as a first‐line therapy.

Results

A total of 104 patients were enrolled and 39 patients received upfront brain radiotherapy, while 65 patients received first and second generation EGFR‐TKIs first. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3–9.4). The median survival time (MST) was 24.0 months (95% CI: 20.1–30.1). The overall response rate of the CNS was 37%. The median CNS progression‐free survival (PFS) was 13.2 months (95% CI: 10.0–16.2). Brain radiotherapy prior to EGFR‐TKI prolonged TTF (11.2 vs. 6.8 months, P = 0.038) and tended to prolong CNS‐PFS (15.6 vs. 11.1 months, P = 0.096) but was not significantly associated with overall survival (MST 26.1 vs. 24.0 months, P = 0.525). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that poor performance status and the presence of extracranial metastases were poor prognostic factors related to overall survival.

Conclusion

EGFR‐TKI showed a favorable effect for EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients with CNS metastases. Prolonged TTF and CNS‐PFS were observed with upfront brain radiotherapy.