The Role of Extent of Surgical Resection and Lymph Node Assessment for Clinical Stage I Pulmonary Lepidic Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis of 1991 Patients

Enhanced Survival with Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lymphadenectomy is a cornerstone in the surgical management of resectable primary lung cancer. However, its prognostic significance in early-stage metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC) remains poorly understood. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in these patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the SEER Database for patients surgically treated for stage I MSPLC between 2004 and 2015. Propensity score-matching was employed to create comparable cohorts, and the Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival after lymphadenectomy compared to non-lymphadenectomy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Among 920 identified patients with MSPLC, 574 (62.4%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Propensity score-matching yielded 255 patients in both the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Over a median follow-up of 38 months, the 5-year overall survival probability after a diagnosis of MSPLC was 58.7% in the lymphadenectomy group and 43.9% in the non-lymphadenectomy group (HR: 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.90; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, lymphadenectomy is associated with prolonged overall survival in patients with stage I MSPLC. These findings suggest the potential benefit of incorporating lymphadenectomy into the surgical management of MSPLC, providing valuable guidance for thoracic surgeons in clinical decision-making.

Prognostic Factors of Non-Predominant-Lepidic Lung Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Ground Glass Opacity: Results of a Multicenter Study

This study aims to define the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of non-predominant lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as Ground Glass Opacity (GGO) nodules. The goal is to assess statistical relationships between histology, tumor size, location, and the incidence of relapse and lymph node dissemination. A retrospective multicenter study was conducted, including patients with GGO observed on CT scans between 2003 and 2021. Anamnestic, radiological, and histological data, as well as SUV values, lymphatic and vascular invasion, pathological stage, resection type, and adjuvant treatment, were analyzed. The primary endpoints were to evaluate prognostic factors for death and recurrence using Cox regression analysis. All 388 patients, including 277 with non-predominant lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma and 161 with lepidic adenocarcinoma, underwent curative anatomical resection. Non-predominant lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma demonstrated a worse prognosis than lepidic adenocarcinoma (p = 0.001). Independent prognostic factors for death and recurrence included lymph node involvement (p = 0.002) and vascular and lymphatic invasion (p < 0.001). In conclusion, non-predominant lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma and lymphatic and vascular invasion are prognostic factors for death and recurrence in GGO patients. Results suggest adjuvant treatment in the case of pN1-N2 disease, emphasizing the necessity of lymphadenectomy (sampling or systematic) for accurate staging and subsequent therapeutic procedures.

Sub-Lobar Resection: The New Standard of Care for Early-Stage Lung Cancer

The Lung Cancer Study Group previously established lobectomy as the standard of care for treatment of clinical T1N0 NSCLC. Advances in imaging technology and refinements in staging have prompted a re-investigation to determine the non-inferiority of sub-lobar resections to lobectomies. Two recent randomized studies, JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503, are reviewed here in the context of LCSG 0821. The studies confirm non-inferiority for sub-lobar resection (wedge or segmentectomy) compared to lobectomy for peripheral T1N0 NSCLC less than or equal to 2 cm. Sub-lobar resection should therefore be considered the new standard of care in this sub-set of patients with NSCLC.

[Advances in the Study of Invasive Non-mucinous Adenocarcinoma with Different Pathological Subtypes]

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the world today, and adenocarcinoma is the most common histopathological type of lung cancer. In May 2021, World Health Organization (WHO) released the 5th edition of the WHO classification of thoracic tumors, which classifies invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA) into lepidic adenocarcinoma, acinar adenocarcinoma, papillary adenocarcinoma, solid adenocarcinoma, and micropapillary adenocarcinoma based on its histological characteristics. These five pathological subtypes differ in clinical features, treatment and prognosis. A complete understanding of the characteristics of these subtypes is essential for the clinical diagnosis, treatment options, and prognosis predictions of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, including recurrence and progression. This article will review the grading system, morphology, imaging prediction, lymph node metastasis, surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy of different pathological subtypes of INMA.
.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 2: systematic review of evidence regarding resection extent in generally healthy patients

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy, thermal ablation), weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in generally healthy patients is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In healthy patients there is no short-term benefit to sublobar resection vs. lobectomy in randomized and non-randomized comparisons. A detriment in long-term outcomes is demonstrated by adjusted non-randomized comparisons, more marked for wedge than segmentectomy. Quality-of-life data is confounded by the use of video-assisted approaches; evidence suggests the approach has more impact than the resection extent. Differences in pulmonary function tests by resection extent are not clinically meaningful in healthy patients, especially for multi-segmentectomy vs. lobectomy. The margin distance is associated with the risk of recurrence.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in healthy patients with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation on which to build a framework for individualized clinical decision-making.

Complete Lymphadenectomy for Clinical Stage I Lepidic Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: Is it justified?

The role of a systematic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing surgery for clinical stage I lung lepidic adenocarcinoma is still unclear. In the last years, some authors have advocated the possibility to avoid a complete lymph-node dissection in this setting. Results of patients who received systematic hilar-mediastinal nodal dissection for this oncologic condition are here reported. Between 2012 and March 2019, 135 consecutive patients underwent lung resection for clinical stage I lepidic adenocarcinoma, at our institution. Only patients (n=98) undergoing lobectomy or sublobar resection associated with systematic hilar-mediastinal nodal dissection were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Patients' mean age was 67.8±8.7 years (range 37-84). Three were 52 females and 46 males. Resection was lobectomy in 77.6% (n=76) and sublobar in 22.4% (n=22). All the resections were complete (R0). Histology was lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma in 85 cases and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma in 13 cases. At pathologic examination, N0 was confirmed in 78 patients (79.6%), while N+ was found in 20 cases (20.4%), (N1 in 12, 12.2% and N2 in 8, 8.2%). No mortality occurred. Complication rate was 8.2%. At a median follow-up of 45.5 months, recurrence rate was 26.5%. Disease-free 5-year survival was 98.6% for stage I, 75% for stage II and 45% for stage III, p<0.001. A complete nodal dissection can reveal occult nodal metastases in lepidic adenocarcinoma patients and can increase the accuracy of pathologic staging. N1/N2 disease is a negative prognostic factor for this histology. A systematic lymph-node dissection should be considered even in this setting.

Comparison of surgical outcomes and prognosis between wedge resection and simple Segmentectomy for GGO diameter between 2 cm and 3 cm in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter and propensity score matching analysis

Background

As segmentectomy had become commonly used for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treatment, which had the advantages of radical operation, however, it remains controversial owing to procedural complexity and risk of increased complications compared with wedge resection. We evaluated operative and postoperative outcomes of simple segmentectomy compared to wedge resection in ground-glass opacity (GGO) diameter between 2 cm and 3 cm NSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1600 clinical GGO diameter between 2 cm and 3 cm NSCLC patients who received simple segmentectomy and wedge resection between Jan 2011 and Jan 2015. Participants were matched 1:1 on their propensity score for two groups. Clinic-pathologic, operative, and postoperative results of two groups were compared.

Results

After using propensity score methods to create a matched cohort of participants with simple segmentectomy group similar to that wedge resection, there were no significant differences detected in tumor size, margin distance, histology, age, sex, preoperative comorbidities and preoperative pulmonary function. Overall complications in simple segmentectomy group were more than wedge resection group (21% vs 3%, p = 0.03). Median operative time (110.6 vs. 71.2 min; p = 0.01) and prolonged air leakage (12% vs. 3%; p = 0.02) was significantly longer in the simple segmentectomy group. There was no difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of 5-years between simple segmentectomy group and wedge resection group. Postoperative pulmonary function in simple segmentectomy group recovered more slowly than wedge resection group.

Conclusion

Wedge resection may have comparable efficacy as simple segmentectomy for GGO diameter between 2 cm and 3 cm NSCLC, but lead to less complications, less surgical procedure and faster recovery of pulmonary function.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09129-0.

Comparative analysis of the long-term outcomes of segmentectomy and lobectomy for stage IA1 lung adenocarcinoma in patients with or without previous malignancy of other organs: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

For early stage non-small cell lung cancer, whether limited resection can yield comparable outcomes to those of lobectomy hasn't been established. We compared Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) after segmentectomy or lobectomy in stage IA1 (≤10 mm) lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients who'd been diagnosed with lung cancer for the first time and treated with segmentectomy or lobectomy, with or without previous other malignancy.

RESULTS

1788 patients were included. After propensity score matching: 5-year OS were 85.6% for segmentectomy and 84.7% for lobectomy (p=0.951); 5-year LCSS were 93.5% for segmentectomy; and 93.0% for lobectomy (p=0.726). Cox regression analysis revealed segmentectomy was comparable to lobectomy in OS and LCSS. Having a second lung cancer later in life was associated with a worse LCSS for lobectomy (p<0.05) rather than segmentectomy. After patients were stratified according to malignancy history, subgroup analyses showed no significant prognosis differences between two surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

For stage IA1 LUAD patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer for the first time, with or without previous other malignancy, segmentectomy yields comparable outcomes to those of lobectomy. It may provide better outcomes for patients with multiple suspicious nodules.

Clock dial integrated positioning combined with single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a new localization method for lung tumors

Background

Preoperative localization of lung tumor mainly consisted of two methods: CT-guided percutaneous localization and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy-guided localization. However, these invasive methods could result in serious complications. In order to avoid the adverse effects of preoperative invasive localization, we propose a method of intraoperative noninvasive localization for lung tumors: clock dial integrated positioning (CDIP).

Methods

To retrospectively analyze the clinic data about the application of CDIP for 127 lung tumour patients in single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SUPVATS) between June 2017 and October 2017.

Results

One hundred and twenty-four cases (97.64%) underwent thoracoscopic surgery, which including 14 lobectomy, 107 partial resection, 2 lobectomy plus partial resection and 1 left pneumonectomy. Three cases (2.36%) underwent thoracoscopic biopsy. The mean operation time and intraoperative bleeding were 47.9±22.1 min and 70.1±40.3 mL, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay and chest drain duration were 3.9±2.2 and 3.6±1.8 days, respectively. There were 118 cases of malignant tumors, including adenocarcinoma (n=101), squamous cell carcinoma (n=9), large cell carcinoma (n=2), small cell lung carcinoma (n=3), and metastatic lung carcinoma (n=3). The remaining nine cases were benign tumors, including granuloma (n=3), intrapulmonary lymph node (n=2), sclerosing hemangioma (n=2), and hamartoma (n=2). The incidence of postoperative complications was 10.2%. There was no mortality, secondary operation, or conversion to open procedure due to massive intraoperative bleeding.

Conclusions

CDIP combined with SUPVATS is a safe, feasible, and effective method for the localization of lung tumors. This novel method can provide a reliable alternative technique when the marker is dislocated.

The effect of extent of resection on outcomes in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

There is poor understanding of the comparative effectiveness of lobar and sublobar resections for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We analyzed the National Cancer Database to examine the outcomes of patients undergoing wedge resection (WR), segmentectomy (SR), and lobectomy (LB) for limited-stage SCLC.

METHODS

Patients with cT1-2N0M0 SCLC (2004-2015) who underwent definitive surgery were identified and stratified by extent of resection: WR, SR, or LB. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were margin-positive resection (>R0) and pathologic nodal upstaging.

RESULTS

A total 1948 patients met study criteria: 619 (32%) underwent WR, 96 (5%) SR, and 1233 (63%) LB. Patients receiving LB were more likely to be younger, have fewer comorbidities, and be privately insured. The unadjusted 5-year OS of WR, SR, and LB patients was 31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27-35), 35% (95% CI, 25-49), and 45% (95% CI, 42-49), respectively. In a multivariable Cox model, WR was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.79) and SR similar OS (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.87-1.67) compared with LB. SR was associated with similar survival compared with LB in a propensity score-matched multivariable analysis as well. WR was also associated with greater odds of >R0 resection compared with LB.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, patients with limited-stage SCLC undergoing WR experienced worse survival compared with those undergoing LB; survival was similar between segmentectomy and LB.

Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy vs lobectomy in pathologic stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma: A population-based study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

For early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma, it remains unclear whether segmentectomy can yield outcomes equivalent to those of lobectomy. This study aimed to compare survival outcomes after segmentectomy and lobectomy among patients with stage IA invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We identified patients with stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2015). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 5474 patients were included. Before PSM, the 5-year OS was 78.3% for patients undergoing lobectomy vs 76.5% for patients undergoing segmentectomy (P = .166) while LCSS were 86.8% vs 83.0% (P = .015). After PSM, survival analyses showed that segmentectomy had OS (75.8% vs 76.4%; P = .694) and LCSS (82.7% vs 82.9%; P = .604) equivalent to those of lobectomy. Cox regression demonstrated that segmentectomy was equivalent to lobectomy in terms of OS and LCSS before and after PSM.

CONCLUSION

For stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma, segmentectomy may have oncologic outcomes equivalent to those of lobectomy.

Current indications and outcomes for thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early stage lung cancer

Management of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is evolving as the epidemiology of NSCLC has changed due to decreased rates of smoking in the general population, the development of screening programs and advancements in imaging modalities. Surgical technique is also evolving as a result of changes in instrumentation. Segmentectomy for early stage NSCLC has the advantage of preservation of lung function. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy is a safe option for surgeons already experienced in VATS lobectomy and offers comparable oncological benefit with better quality of life in selected patients. In this article, we will examine the role of segmentectomy and VATS for early stage NSCLC.

Bronchioalveolar carcinoma in an adult alpaca (Vicugna pacos)

BACKGROUND

This report describes a case of a bronchiolar adenocarcinoma in a 6-year old alpaca mare. For the first time in an alpaca, neoplasia was classified by histopathology as a lepidic-predominant bronchiolar adenocarcinoma.

CASE PRESENTATION

The mare was referred to the Clinic for Ruminants after a 6-week period of forced breathing and weight loss. The clinical examination included complete blood count, blood chemistry, ultrasound, radiographs and a CT-scan of the thorax. A bilateral pneumothorax and several, structures within the lung parenchyma were diagnosed. Differential diagnosis included neoplasia, tuberculosis and fungal granulomas. The owner requested euthanasia due to the mare's ongoing deterioration. At postmortem examination, the granulomatous changes in the lungs were histopathologically classified as lepidic dominant bronchiolar adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoplastic diseases are more often seen in South American camelids compared to other farm animal species. The use of a CT scan was helpful in classifying the lung lesions and give a clear prognosis.

Simplified synchronous disconnection of pulmonary arteries and veins for right upper lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy with lymphadenectomy is considered one of the most effective treatments for early non-small cell lung cancer. We developed a novel approach for lobectomy in patients with right upper lung cancer through simplified synchronous disconnection of pulmonary arteries and veins. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of this minimally invasive technique in managing right upper lobectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 2016 to September 2017, 62 patients with right upper lung cancer underwent lobectomy via simplified synchronous disconnection of pulmonary arteriovenous by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. All patients were followed up for 6-12 months after the procedure through clinic visits or telephone/e-mail interviews.

RESULTS

Of the 62 patients (mean age, 57.2 ± 8.7 years), 28 were men (45.2%) and 34 (54.8%) were women. All procedures were successfully performed by thoracoscopy, with a mean operating time of 66.2 ± 9.0 min. The mean blood loss was 40.3 ± 19.5 mL. Only 1 (1.61%) patient required blood transfusion. The mean number of endoscopic linear stapling devices used was 2.6 ± 0.7. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 16.0 ± 1.6. Postoperative pneumonia was encountered in 4 (6.45%) patients. There was no postoperative mortality. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.3 ± 1.3 days. Six-month follow-up revealed an excellent clinical result and degree of satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Simplified synchronous disconnection of pulmonary arteries and veins is a feasible, economical, safe, and effective therapeutic procedure for right upper lung carcinoma. This novel procedure shows promise as a viable surgical approach for right upper lobectomy.

Surgical Outcomes of Radiographically Noninvasive Lung Adenocarcinoma according to Surgical Strategy: Wedge Resection, Segmentectomy, and Lobectomy

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of surgical resection in patients with radiographically noninvasive lung adenocarcinoma according to the surgical strategy.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted of 128 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for ground-glass opacity (GGO)–dominant nodules measuring ≤2 cm with a consolidation/tumor ratio ≤0.25 based on computed tomography between 2008 and 2015. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate were analyzed.

Results

Among the 128 patients, wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy were performed in 40 (31.2%), 22 (17.2%), and 66 patients (51.6%), respectively. No significant differences were found among the groups in the mean size of tumors (p=0.119), the rate of pure-GGO nodules (p=0.814), the consolidation/tumor ratio (p=0.695), or the rate of invasive adenocarcinoma (p=0.378). Centrally located tumors were more common in the lobectomy group (21.2%) than in the wedge resection (0%) or segmentectomy (0%) groups (p=0.001). There were no significant differences in the 5-year DFS rate (100%, 100%, 92.7%, respectively; p=0.76) or 5-year OS rate (100%, 100%, 100%; p=0.223) among the wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy groups.

Conclusion

For radiographically noninvasive lung adenocarcinoma measuring ≤2 cm with a consolidation/tumor ratio ≤0.25, wedge resection and segmentectomy could be comparable surgical options to lobectomy.

Intraoperatively measured tumor size and frozen section results should be considered jointly to predict the final pathology for lung adenocarcinoma

Invasive adenocarcinoma intraoperatively misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma is more likely to undergo potentially insufficient resection. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of frozen section. We retrospectively reviewed 1,111 lung adenocarcinomas from January to March 2016 to evaluate the diagnostic performance of frozen section. A derivation cohort consisting of 436 cases of adenocarcinoma in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma diagnosed by frozen section in the same period were analyzed to find predictive factors for invasive adenocarcinoma as the final diagnosis. Validation cohorts (first: April to June 2016, second: January to March 2015) were included to confirm the results. The overall concordance rate between frozen section and final diagnosis was 92%. Most frozen section errors were underestimation. The sensitivity of frozen section diagnosis for minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (74%) was significantly lower than others. Intraoperatively measured tumor size was the only independent factor for invasive adenocarcinoma as the final diagnosis (<1 cm: 2%, reference; 1-1.4 cm: 15%, odds ratio, 5.678; > 1.5 cm: 18%, odds ratio, 5.878; P = 0.001) in the derivation cohort, and was confirmed by validation cohorts. Fifty-nine misdiagnosed invasive adenocarcinomas in the three cohorts consisted of 54 lepidic predominant type, 1 papillary and 4 acinar predominant type. There were no positive N1, N2 node, pleural, lymphatic and vascular invasion cases found. Thirty-seven (37/59, 63%) cases of misdiagnosis were attributed to sampling error, which was the main reason. Our study suggests that adenocarcinoma in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma ≥1 cm by frozen section were more likely to be invasive adenocarcinoma because of sampling error. Frozen section diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma should be considered cautiously for tumors ≥1 cm to avoid potentially insufficient resection.

[Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Experts Consensus on the Management of Ground-Glass Nodules Suspected as Lung Adenocarcinoma (Version 1)]

随着胸部计算机断层扫描（computed tomography, CT）检查，尤其是低剂量薄层CT筛查项目在中国的广泛开展，越来越多的无症状肺部磨玻璃结节（ground-glass nodules, GGNs）被发现。虽然国内及国际上已发布了一系列针对肺部GGNs的指南，但是这些指南的撰写者多来自呼吸、肿瘤及影像专业，可能缺乏对现代微创胸外科的充分认识，造成外科手术在肺部GGNs诊治中的作用不明确，甚至被低估；而且，肺部肿瘤相关的各学科对于早期肺癌，尤其是浸润前病变的处理也缺乏统一规范。因此，基于国内外现有文献及上海市肺科医院多年积累的经验，上海市肺科医院撰写了此诊疗共识。本共识推荐对于疑似肺腺癌的GGNs进行多学科评估，依据诊断，选择合理的处置方式。对于疑似原位腺癌，推荐进行胸部薄层CT随访，或在特定情况下进行不超过肺段切除的限制性肺切除；对于疑似微浸润腺癌，推荐进行限制性肺切除或肺叶切除；对于疑似浸润性腺癌，建议依据病灶是否含有磨玻璃成分、位置、大小、个数及患者躯体情况选择合理的手术方式；而肺多发结节的处理原则推荐为主病灶优先，兼顾次要病灶，综合选择治疗方案。